separately. time-lag and - shodhgangashodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/1074/8/08...all the...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 4
TIME-LAG AND COST OVERRUN OF INVESTMENTS IN KERALA:
AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
The sectoral allocation of plan expenditure during
the first to the eighth plan reveals that around 38 per
cent of the total expenditure of the state is spent on
irrigation and power projects. A study on time-lag and
cost overrun of the investment in these two sectors is
expected to represent clearly the nature and trends in
time-lag and cost overrun of Governmental investment.
Hence a census study with reference to time-lag and cost
overrun of governmental investments relating to all the
completed and ongoing HEPs and irrigation projects is
undertaken here. Along with the census study of HEPs and
irrigation projects a sample study of the time-lag and cost
overrun of industries is also worked out.
Time-lag and Cost Overrun of Irrigation Projects
In Kerala there exist 28 irrigation projects - 10
completed and 18 ongoing. The time-lag and cost overrun of
the completed and the ongoing projects are studied here
separately.
116
117
Time-lag and Cost Overrun of Completed Irrigation Projects
There are 10 completed irrigation projects in
Kerala. The details of the extent of time-lag and cost
overrun of these projects are given in Table 4.1.
The original estimated cost of these 10 projects
was Rs.1,849 lakhs. The actual cost of these projects has
increased to Rs.2,353.83 lakhs. The extent of cost overrun
is Rs.505.49 lakhs. The cost overrun comes to about 27.33
per cent over the original estimated cost.
Out of the 10 completed irrigation projects only
two have negative cost overrun and the other two have only
nominal increase in cost over the original estimate. The
other six projects resulted in considerable extent of cost
overrun, ranging from 43.10 per cent to 135.55 per cent
over the original estimated cost.
All the 10 completed irrigation projects resulted
in time-lag (Table 4.1) ranging from three years to 17
years. Time-lag over the original estimated period
fluctuates between 60 per cent to 500 per cent. The total
gestation period of all these 10 projects are 48 years.
But this has increased to 92 years which shows 191.66 per
cent increase over the original estimated period.
41
a) dp a)U1 ro
0 m ro Cto ai •H
N a U a) •H
►.^-H 0 0
^a
O H
4J 4Jm
2(1) -4 L
a 0a,U
ri
C
H 4J U)^j U)0 a, U
C•H
0,
U 0
w ^a)
U) .H
a
>, U
4Jr•,
O tW U
w0
('roN •H
ri
N 0 NU E
ri 0U) Z
ri
C0'0
0
m
0
N
ll,
N
0 0
co co 0,d' m m
0) U'1 0Q' Ip I
mIn ITN N m
p 0, ri O ri0 r-4 N I i0
v, NN If,
to co 0 ri N 'Dm co m t0 0 0
Lr)
U CD co co com co co V' 0
N0 0
O 0 .-•i m- 0 0 m
0 0ri N
0 I 0 N
^o c 0,'o N in
N0, O O inm I 0 0
0
to
Nri 0m N 0ri N 0,
in N 0C7 Ol N
N
ri a' rn0, m d'
N 03
0 0 0 0 0 10 u, 0 0 0l0d' 0 N N N l0 (N
ri (N (N in 1.4 N .--I N .--I
N N N I- ID 0,
10 i0, in
rn' -I
N M H co N0,
In t[,
N ;T a l0 i0 I- N ri (N mto 10 i0 If, In V, 10 l0 10 100, 0, m 0, 0, 0' 0) 0, 0, 0,ri r1 r-i r-i .-•I --I ri -4 -4 ri
N I- N- C NI -4 M r-i CO 10r-I -4 r-I N r•i .-i r-i .H
0, l0 '.0 m N l0 '' d' m r-IIn 10 l0 N to l0 t0 io N r-0) 0) 0) 0, 0, 0) 0) 0,r--1 .--1 ri ri .--1 ri ri •H ri .--I
N 0) Q,IT0)ri ri -4
.-I ri m m '.o N coIt, u•, Ul to Lr) (0 u,0) 0) 0) 0) 0, 0,ri r-i ••-i r--I .H . -i ri
U4 Ua ro
(a
• H X Q. I-^ C r--I ro ro- ro E ro ro (a >. .0
U ri fa >+ -C U. ro C
N (a A N C ri a)
v - Ia a^ ro ro ro vCl. 0 £ Z > £ 3 £
ri
118
N m d to ^o N 03 0,
C
4-10
Ori
•D
UH
Vrori
> U
H x_w0
ro41
a) >
11 . 1aid's E-4(a(4 4V CoU) `"ro ro
N H alO U U '
4-400
ro
U
4.40
119
Out of the 10 completed irrigation projects four
have a time lag of more than 10 years. Out of the 10
completed irrigation projects nine projects have a time-lag
of more than six years. Table 4.1 clearly brings out the
fact that time lag and cost overrun in the implementation
of commissioned irrigation projects are a common feature of
almost all projects.
Time-lag and Cost Overrun of Ongoing Irrigation Projects
There are 18 ongoing irrigation projects in
Kerala . The time-lag and cost overrun of these 18 projects
are given in Table 4 . 2. The original estimated cost of
these 17 projects ( excluding sl.no . 17) is Rs .17,661 lakh.
The latest estimated cost of (1991) these 17 projects is
(excluding sl.no .17) Rs.1,11,731 lakhs. The cost overrun
of these 17 projects amounts to Rs.94,070 lakhs
(estimated ). Thus there is 671 . 55 per cent increase over
the original estimated cost ( Table 4 . 2). As per 1991
estimate the Kallada project has the highest amount of cost
overrun of Rs.30,021 lakh showing 2 , 260 per cent increase
over the original estimated cost.
Time-lag of the Ongoing Irrigation Projects
The extent of time lag of the ongoing irrigation
project is presented in Table 4.2. The Periyar irrigation
C O (0^•''>ca) do 0 0)
° (0 N 04-) fo00 C d 0O a l+ LU W U J-)
0
co
120
ClC'
coN
Clr
DN
rco iD N N
n m Cl co 8 ini M in 0rl rr, ri .-i .-i .-i r -.q 0)
N%D Ln U')(Cl d' r)
rCIf) V'
Nru7d'
Nrn
8r
r01 0 0).i U') m
01O C 0C)cD co -
co S mN Ln '-O
OCi 0 NN m u)r rl) e'
Cla)
rr
OlCC)
ccao
0(Cl
co'C' C!) tD 0 Cl 07 NM ri ch ri d' M r r
° 11 0 8 0 0 01D [P M V ' V' l0 co N N
ri Ln -41 tn 17lqrf+) N N N N N
in l0 r '.0 %D d'
co 2 co
d 81.-i r co r co co r co w co 0
Cl rn 0) ^ rn 01% 01 rn m.-I .-I .-I 1-4 .-I .-i ,-4 1-4 ri
Iarot t
b '0 I`°+ a b as 0>. ro H -Li -.i C Ia
-W N 0) m 4J
a x a% v x a. a x a
I 4 U1 (0 N co Is
121
i7
o)cx
-
co90
N^r 0
gccrnom
U)in)n
rico (N IZT 0 m NC' '-1 to N 1 co tD
9ON
coco0)
rnC
co0)
CC)0)
Oto
m I tD 11
N to rn CC) ri to I 11 r-1
N N N O1 N 0) N 01
)
D•
^DN1
O1
0
(D
N
01
C
20
0
01
-1
a0
O
Lnto
to
M O7 to 1-1 01 d' N ri
a)
N
to
v
N
4 b N4J 1G Sa
:3 -4?C 1+ 1.+ to .lr G) c0 aS.i N 0 'O U - 1•+ -1a 1artC1 U) ro m it
x x x £ 0) >
N M V' t!1 to N CDri r-1 ri ri ri ' ri
to if N
m co m 8 co cc0 0
0 M N I ON-I m
q r-M N N N N
-1 11 01Mi 0) 01
C V V' IT
00
M
0
N
00
M
01U1M
01 I- N 01a)coN
0)M M m M N
ri M v to inC coCO C coco co 9
rn co a aco a OD fl, m fl, ma as
a d'C` O> a) 01 a) 01 0l 0) coa ri H ri H 1-1 H 1--I H r1 H ri H ri H Q1ri ^ > -> '-> -> v > v v ,> r1
in to CO 01 01 0 r-1 ri rir- r- r- r- r- co co co 0001 0) 01 01 01 01 01 01 01ri ri ri _1 r1 11 1-1 ri ri
122
project started in 1956 with a gestation period of 5 years.
It was originally planned to get it commissioned in 1961.
But even today it is not yet commissioned. Todate it has
registered a time-lag of 32 years. There is 620 per cent
increase over the original estimated period of completion.
All the ongoing projects have experienced a terrible extent
of time-lag and cost overrun (Table 4.2). When compared
with the completed irrigation projects the extent of time-
lag and cost overrun is very high in the case of ongoing
irrigation projects.
Since all these 18 irrigation projects are in the
implementing stage, if this trend of time-lag and cost
overrun continues the magnitude of time-lag and cost
overrun will increase further. Thus the extent of time-lag
and cost overrun of the irrigation projects is not only
high but also of an increasing trend.
These 17 ongoing projects have an original
estimated cost of Rs.17,661 lakhs. But a total expenditure
of Rs.65,226.25 lakhs have gone into these 17 projects so
far, but no project is completed yet.
Time-lag and Cost Overrun of Hydro-electric Projects in
Kerala
In Kerala there exist 28 hydro-electric projects
123
of which 12 projects are completed and 16 projects still
Time-lag and Cost Overrun of Completed Hydro-electric
Project
The extent of time-lag and cost overrun of
completed hydro-electric projects is given in Table 4.3.
I
I
The original estimated cost of the 12 commissioned
hydro-electric projects is Rs .17,476.01 lakhs. But the
actual cost of these has increased to Rs .37,730. 54 lakhs
incurring a cost overrun of Rs .20,254.53 lakhs. Thus there
is an increase in cost of 115.89 per cent over the original
estimated amount . These figures reveal that cost overrun
amount is even higher than the original estimated cost of
these 12 projects. This means that the excess expenditure,
in the form of cost overrun on these 12 hydro-electric
projects is even sufficient enough to construct an equal
number of additional projects.
The Idamalayar HEP started in 1973 has an original
estimated cost of Rs.2,340 lakhs. But the cost of the
project has increased to Rs.9,003 lakhs, causing a cost
overun of Rs.6,663 lakhs. This comes to be about 284.74
per cent increase over the original estimated cost.
>'p roaitroO b N a'
to C U N •'0
OO
1)
U OQ U
0
124
O] N
ci' Cy
N
C
LnCOM
M
N
M c'r- co0
N N r
D 00
In 0r O
I, 0 rn rM r c' r
M N
OM M 0N M 0 0
.D 0 O 0 0 00M 01 d' l0 M 1D
M M M 10 ID
^p M rr r N
O r iDr p
p In Op N O
O O '--4rn 0N N M
M In N V'
z
r
co O.1
OD ^TIn IDI II
O ^ r M M co^' Lr) k.0
rn rnrn rn rn rn -4 -
O- d
I II 1
r_4
E
In £ £ E £ £
r C N In 0 31M V M c' M In
a
4-J
.-1 aIa Xro E r+ C fJro ro ro ro s^ ro> r^ rn E cc m.,4 a c ro Cr-Irl C U 5-i C 0(a a) a) a) a .Ca cn a z
mz
125rn
0 r u,aoip
r
r
co'ITCD
00 0m
1.- r N N N N
0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 00 M
., Lt 0 4N
^
ko
mN
0N
kD 0 co.--1 u N
I
to 0N
0 0 0 0 00
I
0 o O0 O O
0 0 m 0 Oco 0 0 0 0N u') 0 0 ul O r
";r '4 0 i OD rM
.--t x00 0 0 0 0 O 0 wO O o
0 0 .m
O
LLD 0 0 0 rroO
V'^pm
N
/N^o
0r m
N
Il
to
St^1 N r
'-i
r
OO M
4J
0
^'aOro
trLr) 0 0
to N MCC) M 4-1
roa -
M M
O N Od'
41 co
0-upp
r co S' tf1 pp0N
I fi
31 U)'-I r-i
0
0) rG
cokD
r ioio rrn -
LnO
N rr co0 0
0
0)
m 0O r0 0 0
Lf)to
M [r>+ LDro 0 O)
. { .-i
M Ul Olr r ra\
E Z
o rn N Lom m r r
a) 0)
CD Oro ro4-t JJEn to
ti -4x xx x
roH H
N' -I
^
ro
Hxw
b O(0
N Ox4 0wO 'O
.ro>0'O0 r_
c >.,-4 .,,'D Cro roOma-4OC 41 O
co
m Cr(tltl t
a o
Ernaro-1^ r 'n
126
All the completed hydro-electric projects of the
state resulted in cost overrun and the extent of the same
is very high (Table 4.3).
Out of the nine completed hydro-electric projects
all the projects met with time-lag. The extent of time-lag
veries from 2 years to 10 years (Table 4.3). In the case
of Idukki Stage III, the extent of time-lag is 10 years.
This is 200 per cent increase over the original estimated
period for completion. The total gestation period of these
nine projects are 62.5 years which has increased to 102
years causing a time-lag of 40 years which comes to be
about 61.27 per cent over the original estimated period.
Time-lag and Cost Overrun of the Ongoing HEPs
There are 15 ongoing HEPs in Kerala, started during
the period 1972 to 1989. The latest cost estimates of
these projects show that all these projects resulted in
cost overrun (Table 4.4). The original estimated cost of
these projects is Rs .16,079 lakhs. As per the latest
estimate this has increased to Rs.25,689 lakhs, resulting
in a cost overrun of Rs.13,741 lakhs. This shows an
increase of 85.46 per cent in cost over the original
estimated amount.
127
The extent of cost overrun is very high in the
case of ongoing HEPs . In the case of Lower Periyar Hydro-
Electric Project, the original estimated cost of the
project is Rs.8,843 lakhs. As per 1990 revised estimate
this has increased to Rs.14,500 lakhs. Thus a sum of
Rs.5,657 lakhs in addition has to be spent on the project
to meet the cost overrun (Table 4.4).
Since these are ongoing projects, and if this
trend in cost overrun is maintained , the extent of cost
overrun will increase further.
Even before reaching the commissioning stage, all
the projects resulted in time-lag. The extent of time-lag
varies from 2 to 10 years as per the 1990 revised estimate
(Table 4 . 4). And if this trend of time- lag is maintained,
the extent of time-lag will increase further. The projects
started in 1972 with a gestation period of 9 years remain
incomplete even today after 20 years of project work. The
extent of time-lag of the ongoing projects is very high.
According to the original time schedule the total period
for the completion of these 15 projects is 58 years. As
per the 1990 time schedule it will take 129 years to
N 01 -4c intro
4-) C
m 0) U a) •^0 > m c > 0() 0 ro •ri 0 0
In
12801
N -1 0r- 1--i CO CN
co OD <T C) 0^D ri r♦ r-I r-( N co C'
m.--I N 00 CC M
'-)'IT r) r4d' N r-1 0 In d ' rn -Ico r+) N - N d' C) .--1
r`-) 0 (-
lD N rn N o ri m I
I _
0 0 N
4-i -J-) 'D ICI)ro V) N O m.7 0) L U
r 08 g'T m C)(N° g
ro
roro tc ro
E4-1
r1.r-4 L 170
00) 0 .--I
440 C
N41Ua)
7ari N J-) C
}Q) >•+ dP ro 0 rnE al N N •r+
E O N U 0 0
0
^-1
•n0 U)0 C 14aU
Orov
N ) > rnm0
4
ri•. CE 0 -rr
4)U0) 0
0 010) N I W C
001 C••NU (
V -ii L FeN 1
0
a)N
UOS 0C ro•rl E0
)
^
0 mC N aa 0.>, U N
1 -rC•1
N
0)c rHi)a, 0C 0
04J J J 4-) • ri
0m
J¢ 0I0 U C
0
4-1 ro0
C.-•I Q'ro CC I •ri.r1 m -r1 C
•^ (00 L.i E •- 0)0)
O >4144 UOU to0
L'V)
0to
0 I •- ObiU -°1.^a^ CVCrornro-I
NE
H
toU N
w o c0 •ri •
yri
^► U ►+
a, 5 I N0)
a) ro.i
rt1h
N
E
NW J) r-1
00 0 (Y) 0
ri ri co N N N N N
0 --4 N 00 1-1 ^.0 C' I
- 01 to In In M I` II
(3) N r-I OD co OD 0) 1r-i r-•1 r-1
CD n' u') ^' d' In IDON 0)
In r) c r''-) m C' In0) 0) 0) 0) rn 0)
co d' %D r") M N
ri
ID a co1o 0) co00
01 OD ODco
l+ OD co co ODto 0) 0) 01 0 mE r-1 r-( -4 r-i . 1-1
C) r1
0)-I -4 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0)
r-1 .•-I ri r•i r .^
Cl QQ^,la pL) pL) C 0) p)
0) V) Q 0 0 h Q
£ £ a
CD u1 6- EN 10 C' CO
E
lD Inr- CN 'ITIn 'T iD
aWx
1J
0H
A
00 (4/)
2 IP
129
N In 1 1.0 l0 I 1
In m o 0 Inrn m 1i 1: co
0f'm') N 0• - -4
0
M 00)OD 01 N N m inr-I rl N -4 .-i in -4
N
co - N N C N
N '.0 .i .i N r to1 M M 0 a' co
0
N0 8 ° 8 8
In l0 m m m N m
r c0 a In 1.0 In ID
0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0)- .-11-1 .-1 .-1 r1 -1
N N 1`') N (') M M
co co 0) 0)
N N Nco co0) 0) 0) 0)
m 0) m 0)0) 0) 0)
coko to co m 0', 0) m
co 0) 0) co 0) co- rl .-1 r1 .4 . 1 .4
7 a 8 W N 7 aQ Q 1 E h h
Q0 X:tf1
N ^D c0 tf1M ri
Wx
N
MON
01In
ON
co0U-1
M
0)0
N
co
3
m4)C
14N r4 4L1
u0t+
0
130
complete the work. This shows a time-lag of 71 years which
is 122.41 per cent increase over the original estimate.
The Extent of Time-lag and Cost Overrun
As mentioned earlier there are 10 completed
irrigation projects in Kerala. These 10 projects have an
estimated cost of Rs.1,849 lakhs. But the actual cost of
the project is Rs.2,353.83 lakhs. The cost overrun is
Rs.505 lakhs.
I There are 12 completed HEPs in Kerala. The
estimated cost of these projects is Rs.17,476.01 lakhs.
But as seen earlier (Table 4.3) the actual cost has
increased to Rs.37,730.54 lakhs. The cost overrun is
Rs.20,254.53 lakhs.
PF The total expenditure on completed irrigation
projects and hydro-electric projects is Rs.40,084.37 lakhs.
The total amount of cost overrun is Rs.20,760 lakhs. Out
of the total investment of Rs.40,084 lakhs on completed
irrigation and HEPs, Rs.20,760 lakhs, just about half of the
total, is consumed away by cost overrun. As per the
original estimate, the project could have been commissioned
without this additional amount of investment. As such the
131
amount of Rs.20,760 lakhs brings out zero output. This
shows that cost overrun contributes to capital wastage.
Again the 12 completed hydro-electric projects
have a total time-lag of 37 years. This means that these
12 HEPsof the state could have been completed without this
additional time, had it been completed as per original
schedule. This implies that the employment, output, and
income that could have been generated by these projects in
these 37 year's are lost.
Tables 4.2 and 4.4 reveal the very large extent of
time lag and cost overrun that has led to capital wastage
and capital loss in the ongoing hydro-electric and
irrigation projects of Kerala.
Time-lag and Cost Overrun: A Study of Industries in Kerala
State
In Kerala, the phenomenon of time-lag and cost
overrun is not only confined to projects in the primary and
infrastructural sectors but is also found in the case of
projects in the secondary sector. To analyse and identify
the extent of time-lag and cost overrun in the projects of
secondary sector, a sample study of the time-lag and cost
132
overrun of five public sector industrial undertakings is
carried out. The samples are selected on the basis of the
year of starting. The other criteria of selecting the
samples are spatial consideration and the availability and
accessibility of data. A sample study of time-lag and cost
overrun of two private sector industrial undertakings is
also carried out alongwith the five public sector
industries.
Data relating to time-lag and cost overrun of
seven industries are given in Table 4.5. Kerala Metals and
Minerals Ltd., a public sector industrial project, started
in 1978 with a gestation period of four years resulted in a
time-lag of about 3 years making 72.34 per cent increase
over the original scheduled period. This project with an
original estimated cost, of Rs.6,499.88 lakhs resulted in a
cost overrun of Rs.3,340 lakhs. Here is a 51.38 per cent
increase in cost over the original estimate (Table 4.5).
Out of the five public sector industrial units
studied, four resulted in considerable extent of time-lag
and cost overrun. But only one unit ie., the KSWIL unit
was completed without any time-lag and cost overrun. This
has happened so because its work has the technical and
s~(1) dP a) .-i> C roo Ul 41 c
(a .iJ 0, C)al CC a) •.4
U 0 0 0
0 Ula)aO C
Ul r_0
roa iJ4-J V)L) 0
8
E.UWh0aa
133
CO N 0) NM r '•1 rn
W '4to co ID
Nl0
0 CM̂y' 0
M 0 NM N to
8 8 0
co mrn .4
co 0 0 0C9 0 0 0
8Ln (n N
M '-1
v toM
N M N tor '-i ' a r
to 0 cor '1 M N
0 0 O)
0 0
'T to 0
N r0 Ln
MlD ID
LID
(N N
r cv ^Lr) u) 0 0 c g
_4 -
C) W 0W0 Coto to to c 0to r r to toto to d' N '•-1 0
M N -1
0 0 0
M M M -1 0 0
to M C' d' M (0 toco co co co co co mrn 6D GD GD rn rn rn
" m a a aD 0 0 h a a a
r a' a' 0 N ID NN N N .--1 r-1 r1
N rl N N M to to
Obi rn a) co rn rn rn
E h a 0 a a E
Nr m CID0 W co
r-jto to
m m 0-1 0', m 00 CD
a Q £ Q , Iq
Ulrito4Ja)E
Croal
'-1
j) U E V a 41J --i^ HaNC '-7 ro i.) a) 'U H (0 U) 0 .-) C
iJ O U CO u a, oa a roUl a) ro Q CD •.^ W
a
2 . -4 to .0 C rl '-t'%1 v
0'O 0 a) - 0'D 0'O .1'6 0 4%la) iJ a ) L (0 (C JJ a) c (D it ro 0 0xa xa E Ua x4F) Ea E El El
a ro aa o 4J E
'U x - H - 0
1610 U)''o '0 ro w 4-3
U) 00rn a a -0 '8-- ro0 '-1 4JJ 4E) 3 'O C 'aN
-1 0to z
134
managerial advice from a private sector unit of similar
nature.
The extent of time-lag is high in the case of
public sector industries. The overall time overrun of the
five projects as percentage increase over the original is
88.1 per cent.
An analysis of the two private sector industries
reveals that one project has no time lag and cost overrun
while the other unit has a negative time-lag and no cost
overrun (Table 4.5). Though one cannot generalise the
findings by studying just two samples, this points to the
fact that time-lag and cost overrun in project
implementation in the private sector is generally very
negligible and sometimes even negative.
The five industrial undertakings of Government of
Kerala have an estimated cost of Rs.12,154.88 lakhs. But
the actual cost has increased to Rs.18,512.62 lakhs. The
cost overrun over the estimated expenditure of Rs.12,154.88
lakhs amounted to Rs.6,357 lakhs making an increase of
52.30 per cent over the original estimated amount (Table
4.5).
135
The cost overrun as percentage increase over the
original estimated cost of all the completed HE1b comes to
115 per cent (Table 4.3), and that of all the completed
irrigation projects to 27.33 per cent,and that of the five
completed public sector industries to 52.30 per cent, and
that of the two completed private sector industries to only
0.428 per cent (Table 4.6).
Table 4.6
Time Lag and Cost Overrun of Completed Projects in
Kerala
(Time lag and cost overrun as percentage increase overthe original estimated amount)
S1. Particulars Time- Cost
No. lag overrun
1. 12 Completed hydroelectricprojects of Kerala
62.71% 115.89%
2. 10 Completed irrigation projects 191.66% 27.33%
3. 5 Industries (Public Sector) 88.1% 52.30
4. 2 Industries ( Private Sector ) 20% 0.428
5. 15 Ongoing hydroelectric projects 127.47 85.46
6. 17 Ongoing irrigation projects 359 532.64
Source: Compiled from Tables 4.1, 4.3 and 4.5.
136
The item-wise split-up of cost overrun of
industries (Table 4.7) reveals that the pre-operative
expenses is the single largest contributor of cost overrun
in most of the industries studied.
Time-lag and Cost Overrun--A Comparative Analysis
Time-lag of the 10 completed irrigation projects
shows 191 . 66 per cent increase over the original schedule
(Table 4.1). Time-lag of the 12 completed hydroelectric
projects amounts to 62.71 per cent increase over the
original scheduled period (Table 4.3). The 15 ongoing
hydroelectric projects resulted in a cost overrun of 127.47
per cent of the original estimate ( Table 4 . 4). The four
industrial units also have an 88.1 per cent increase in
time over the original time schedule.
A comparative study of time-lag of completed HEP
and ongoing HEP shows that time -lag is very high in the
case of ongoing HEP and it increased from 62 .71 per cent to
127.47 per cent ( Table 4.6 ) and is expected to increase
further since the projects are not yet completed. So a
project wise study of time-lag and cost overrun of HEP is
carried out in chapter five.
137
mI f+ c
L ()•^UOM r
U 0 Q
mco
N Urm .-1
r
Uo r 'OC
U) o MO) m rI 01 1 I I-O
I 01U]
.-1HJJ
co r U
U) U) Q' CO NM
r-I 0 a7L a U r ^o
N LX U) M U
7c I rI I I U) I
UlV'
UN
' -1 C
c r1ro
..I m4)0)•NC >
m M U) co t- coL^ r
1
C
'-Ia 0 ••+ M • N
a)a
aU
a) Oa 1o 0)
U
Q L4 1U .
01 01M. 1 0
N O d N V COO
a r • r rn r U10 to aD N t0 I
N
m m' -1 Is^C JJ
CA UD co M
co 01 O1 N may' l0 r M Ea) U 0
►+ a) o
'
-4 U) U) N U) U)° 8 8 U
c•r1 U
a rt vM .-1 N M I!•1 I r-I I ri r•1
2U1
E JJ
m ) 0co 8
a)m
`7
00
O
M
N N
r •
to
U')
0
N D COm
co
L^O
m N N N .--1 r•I i r- 0J-) " U1 V' '-i N I U) 'V' M NUE
H1 $4 C
wM cot0 N
1O
mm
0 0 0 •^ .-1 U
C1J a
a) 0a (0 a)
rnN r-I
rV'
U)a'
U) O 1-10r m
f.+ 0 aJ0) 1n
Q ^ 0000 m10
0
JJU)0
U)
U' -1
J.)UW•n0
C) CJJ > •.i
U) 0 -Q
U)v Or
n[I
om
coN m vrn N
•SJ L a) O ' MLn -I
a
a)U)
wma,L
U 1 '-1 M 1-1 r N N
Ea)aJH
a)E
NcG
CO IT
I ' r1
O
001
m
01
m-I
N N
M N .-1
r
O 0)
0 U. II r I
rO
01 I
C arn U) a u b 4JJ-j $1
U co a aUi rn e a,w rq UI C Sa U1
fi cx D, a u. mC)
•.Ci N u 0 o v m 1
U t a v U) o> U ro y.4 a 0
v >v L C C. So .1 Io m c Q o - ro0
c ro U -1 •.C•1 Q .' .U) E
••-{ 10 U U7 a) d 0 8 E 41 x Iai
M - E- £ a CW a E U F I E
•aJJU) z° .-i cv a U; io r CO M.
081