sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Presented By: DUDBC Assessment Group
![Page 2: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
To access the damage induced by the 2068/6/1 Taplejung Earthquake.
To evaluate the overall approximate cost of damage caused by the Earthquake.
To study about the damage patterns for the formulation of the trainings concerning Earthquake Resistant Construction of Buildings.
![Page 3: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Study Area
Team 1Location:
Dhankuta, Tehrathum, Bhojpur, Sankhuwasabha
Team 2Location:
Jhapa,Ilam,Taplejung,Panchthar
Team Member:(Ilam)S.D.E. Binay Charan ShresthaMahesh SinghHimal K.C.Parikshit P. KadariyaBinod Shrestha (PulchowkCampus)Bhim Paudel (Home Ministry)
Team Member: (Dhankuta)S.D.E. Sagar Krishna JoshiNabin MalakarRam Chandra ThapaGovinda ThapaBishow Kumar Shrestha(Pulchowk Campus)Maiya Kandel (Home Ministry)
![Page 6: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Secondary data was taken from Home Ministry.
The data was verified from the respective CDOOffice.
Field Visits were conducted with co-ordination from CDO Office, Municipality, VDC's, Police, Red Cross and other NGOs.
Sample buildings were selected in such a way that it covers all the Damage Grades according to the data of Home Ministry.
![Page 7: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Data was collected according to the approved format of MoPPW.
Two types of forms were used.
Rapid Evaluation Form
Detailed Evaluation Form
![Page 8: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Data was organized to get the real picture of the damage.
Data was divided according to the damage grade of buildings.
The Data was sorted out to find the types of construction as well as types of occupancy.
![Page 9: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Grade 1: Negligible to slight damage
(no structural damage,
slight non-structural damage)
Hair-line cracks in very few walls.
Fall of small pieces of plaster only.
Fall of loose stones from upper parts of buildings in
very few cases.
Grade 2: Moderate damage
(slight structural damage, moderate
non-structural damage)
Cracks in many walls.
Fall of fairly large pieces of plaster.
Partial collapse of chimneys.
Classification of damage to masonry buildings
![Page 10: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Grade 3: Substantial to heavy
damage (moderate structural damage, heavy non-structural damage)
Large and extensive cracks in most walls.Roof tiles detach. Chimneys fracture at the roof line; failure of individual non-structural elements (partitions, gable walls).
Grade 4: Very heavy damage
(heavy structural damage,very heavy non-structural damage)
Serious failure of walls; partial structural failure of roofs and floors.
Classification of damage to masonry buildings
![Page 11: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Grade 5: Destruction
(very heavy structural damage)
Total or near total collapse.
Classification of damage to masonry buildings
![Page 12: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
All grades of damage were seen.
The data of Home Ministry was correlated with the damage grades as follows
Home Ministry Damage Grade
Minor Damage DG-1
Partial Damage DG-2 & DG-3
Total Damage (Collapse) DG-4 & DG-5
![Page 13: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Ilam Panchthar Taplejung Dhankuta Terhathum
G1
G2
G3
G4
G5
![Page 14: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Stone in Mud RC Frame Stone in Cement Brick in Mud Brick in Cement Others
G1
G2
G3
G4
G5
![Page 15: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
0
5
10
15
20
25
Residential Educational Office Building Police Station Community Building
Others
G1
G2
G3
G4
G5
![Page 16: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Corner Failures/Cracks
Shear Failures and Diagonal Cracks.
Cracks at Openings.
Gable fall down and cracks.
De-lamination of wall
Bulging / Falling of unsupported long walls.
Damage / Falling of Free Standing Walls.
Improper Load Path
Soft Storey Problems.
Torsion
Complete Collapse
Rocking Failure
Floor Separation
Out of Plane Failure
Settlement / Slope Failure
Floor Drift/ Slide
![Page 17: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Lack of Through Stones
Lack of Bands(Sill, Lintel and Gable)and Stitches
Slenderness Ratio Exceeded
Improper Opening Positions and Sizes.
Lack of Better Bonding Between Masonry unit.
Irregular Configuration
Improper Site Selection
Wrong Load Path
Lack of Integrity between Ground Floor and First Floor.
Lack of Vertical Reinforcement at Junction.
![Page 18: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
![Page 26: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
![Page 29: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
![Page 33: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
![Page 36: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
![Page 37: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
![Page 38: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
![Page 39: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
The following recovery measures were suggested for different damage grades.
For DG-1 and other unaffected buildings, it is suggested to retrofit them to cope with the upcoming Earthquakes.
Damage Grade Suggested Recovery Measures
DG-2 Repair + Retrofit
DG-3 Repair, Retrofit + Partial Demolish.
DG-4 & DG-5 Demolish
![Page 40: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
![Page 41: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
![Page 42: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
![Page 43: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Amount in Rs.
Retrofitting with wood members
63226
Retrofitting with Concrete members
289693.20
Repair of cracked wall per meter length
997.60
Cost of new construction 500000
Cost of new construction with using usable existingmaterials ( 60% of New Construction Cost)
300000
![Page 45: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Damage Grade
Total House No.
Unit Cost in Rs. Total Cost
G1 1111 997*20=19,940 = 2,21,53,340
G2 & G3 9749 63226+19940=83,166 =81,07,85,334
G4 & G5 5293 5,00,000 =2,64,65,00,000
Total =3,47,94,38,674
![Page 46: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052508/559890001a28ab4b578b45d7/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Damage Grade
School Building
Other Government Building
G2 & G3 608 362
G4 & G5 350 115