series ii no. official~twgazettegoaprintingpress.gov.in/downloads/1900/9900/9900-51-sii... ·...

SERIES II No. 51

OFFICIAL~tWGAZETTE

I REGD.GOA·5 IPanaji, 16th March, 2000 (Phalguna 26, 1921)

GOVERNMENT.OF GOANote: There is Extraordinary issue to the Official Gazette Sr. Il No. 50

dated 13·3·2000 reKardinK CorriKendum .Ii·om Department o{

Education. Art and Culture and N{iti.llcations from General

Administrution and Dpt. (){ Pallcha:iuti Ral

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

Department of Co-operation

Office of the Col[ector, North Goa District

Election Branch

Order

No.3-4-99-SCS/ELN/COL

Whereas election to the Specified Co-operative Societiesmentioned in Column No. I of schedule given below is to

be conducted under the Provisions of the Rules called GoaSpecified Co-operative Societies Elections to the Comn'iitteeRules, 1978.

And whereas it is essential to appoint Returning Officerand Assistant Returning Officers for the purpose.

Now, therefore, I, Shri Sanjeev Khirwar, Collector ofNorth Goa District, Panaji in exercise of the powers vestedin me under Sub-section (1) of Section 114 C of theMaharashtra Co-operative Societies (Goa Third AmendmentAct) 1977, read with Rule 9 and Sub Rule I of Rule 10 ofthe above said rules hereby appoint the Officer mentionedin Column No.2 of the Schedule as the Returning Officerfor election to the Specified Co-operative Societies and theOfficers mentioned in Column No.3 of the Schedule as theAs'stt. Returning Officers to assist the Returning Officerwithin the jurisdiction of area mentioned in Column No.4of the said Schedule.

SCHEDULE

Name of Specified Returning Officer Assistant Returning JurisdictionCo·operati ve Societies Officers

I 2 3 4

,

Goa Bagayatdar Sahakari ~ 1. MamlatdarTiswadi I. Tiswadi TalukaKharedi & Vikri Saunstha 2. Mamlatdar Bardez I.BardezTalukaMaryadit, Ponda.

I

2. Pernem Taluka:-.._-_. .._-- __.._ .._.._._____...._.__•.._._0.. .._, ... -

The Goan People's Urban 3. Mamlatdar Bicholim .-I---J .Bichglim Taluka ~" .. 'Co-operative BankLtd., Panaji 4. Mamlatdar Ponda I. Ponda Taluka

Dy.,Collector (Revenue) . - _._.'__. __.;-..~~_c-_ ,,'_.

The Goa State Women Co- North Goa District. 5. Mamlatdar Satari I. Satari Talukaoperative Federation ) Collectorate, Panaji.Ltd., Panaji.

...

..The Goa Rajya Sahakari Sangh 6. Mamlatdar Salcete 1. Salcete TalukaMaryadit, Panaji 2. Mormugao Taluka

, ...

-

TheBicholim Urban Co- 7. Mamlatdar Quepem I. Quepem TalukaoperativeBankLtd.,Bicholim j 2. Sapguem Taluka

"-8. MamlatdarCanacona 1. CanaconaTaluka

Sanjeev Khirwar, Collector, North Goa District.

Panaji, 6th March, 2000

886SERIES II No. 51

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOAJ6TH MARCH, 2000

Department of Housing

Corrigendum

No. 2/1-2/93-HSG (II)

Read: Government Order No. 2/1-2/93-HSG-II dated20-12-1999.

The name of Shri YeshwantB. Dhawaskar appearingat Sr. No.4 of the above referred GovenmerttOrder may;beread as "Shri Vishwanath Babani Dhawaskar".

By order and in th~ name of the Governor of Goa.

Sllbhash V. Elekar, Joint Secretary (Housing).

Panaji. 7th March, 2000.

--...--

Department of Irrigation

Notice

No. 4-6/82-CE-Irrg/Adm. 1/1424

Whereas Shri Silvester Fernandes, who was appointed asWorks Supervisor purely on ad-hoc basis and posted in theWorks Division XIV, Irrigation Department, Margao by orderNo. 1/4/81/CE-Irrg/Adm. 1II10n, dt. 27-2-91; joined theservice in the said Division w.e.r. 6-3-1991.

And whereas Shri Silvester Fernandes, Work Supervisor by application dt. 7-4-98 applied for 30 days of EarnedLeave from 15-4-98· to 14-5-98 with encashment of leave. .and the same was sanctioned to him by order No. ID/WDXIV//ADM/IF. 34-4098-99, dt. 20-4-1998 of the Executive Engineer,Works Division XIV, Irrigation Department, Gogal, Margao.

And whereas said Shri Si'lvester Fernandes, Work Supervisor who was to join his duties on 15-5-1998 after expiryof Earned Leave sanctioned to him did not report for dutiesand 'unauthorisedly remained absent from duty till this date.

And whereas the Assistant Engineer, of Sub-Div. IV,Works Division XIV, Irrigation Department, Quepem-Goa,issued letter No.ID/SDIV/WDXIV/F. 3/121/98-99, dt. 15-101998 and the Executive Engineer, Works Division XIV, Irrigation Department, Margao issued Memos. No. ID/WDXIV/F./432/98-99, dt. 11/11/98, NO.ID/WDXIV/Adm./F.C.F./9899/560. dt. 18/1/1999 and No.ID/WDXIV/Adm./F. /99-2000/1146. dt. 2-6-99 at his available address at Quepem directingI1l1n to report for duty immediately.

And whereas efforts were also made to get the memoranc1llfl) dt. 9-1 2~ I 999 of this office served on said Shri SiLvesterFernandes, Works Supervisor, through Police Inspector,Police Station, Quepem, who informed that an'fnquiry wasc.onducted and Shri Silvester Fernandes could not be traced

at his given address and that the wife of Shrt SilvesterFernandes received the said memorandum stating that herhusband Shri Silvester .Fernandys,was sick and had goneto Mumbai last 8 months for medical treatment.

,,' And whereas, in this regard, Smt. Lilia Ana MariaFernandes, wife of Shri Silvester Fernandes, WorkSupervisor, filed an affidavit dt. 24/12/1999 stating that herhusband had to suddenly leave abroad in May, 1998 in orderto attend'hi,s ailing brother, Shri Manuel Fernandes, but shedid not disclose the address either of her husband or of thebrother of Shri Silvester Fernandes, in spite of requesting herand granting time of one month upto 29-2-2000 by lettersdated 4-1-2000 and 24-1-2000;

And whereas this office received, letter dt. 17-2-2000 fromShri Silvester Fernandes, Work Supervisor giving his addresstherein as Division 14, ID, Gogal, Margao-Goa, and informingthat he is unable to join the work till May, 2000 because ofhis family problem.

And whereasitis relevant from the documents in the casefile that Shri Silvester Fernandes, Work Supervisorunauthorisedly remained absenf from duty since 15-5-1998till this date and proceeded abroad as confirmed by his wife,Smt. Lilia Ana Maria Fernandes in her affidavit dated24-12-99 referred above without prior permission of hisappointing authority and as such said Shri SilvesterFernandes, did not maintain absolute integrity and devotionto duty which is unbecoming of a Government Servant.

.Now Therefore, in pursuance of Sub-Rule (l) of Rule 5of the Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules1965, I, Shri S. D. Sayanak, Chief Engineer (Irrigation), herebygive notice to Shri Silvester Fernandes, Work Supervisor.that his services shall stand terminated with effect from thedate of expiry of a period of one month from the date ofissue of this notice.

S. D. Sayanak, Chief Engineer (Irrigation).

Panaji, 3rd March, 2000.

---...-"

De,partment of Inland Waterways

Corrigendum

No.7/21/94-IWT/178

Read:- Government Order No. 7121/94:IWT/5l61 dated2-12-99 regarding voluntary retirement of ShriShivram B. Nadkarni, Workshop Superintendent,Group 'B' Officer from Marine workshop, R. N. D.

Betim.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOASERIES II No. 51

The date of relieving from the post mentioned in para 2of the Government Order cited above shall be read as"1-1-2000 (FN)" instead of"31-12~1999 (AN)".

By order anti in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Capt. A. P. Mascarenhas, Captain of Ports and Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.

Panaji, 20th January, 2000:

--.-....--Department of Law and Judiciary

(Establishment'Division)

Order

No.I-24-84/LD

Read: Government Order No. 1-24-84/LD dated 25-6-87.

Government of Goa, is pleased to include Shri.VinojDaniel, Advocate in the panel of Advocates constituted videabove mentioned Government order dated 25-6-87 for thepurpose of appointment as Government Counsel in theDistrict Courts and Subordinate Courts in the State bf Goaunder the terms and conditions as prescribed by Governmentvide office Memorandum No. 1-24-84/LD dated 25-6-87.

He will be entitled to receive his fees as per the terms andconditions contained in Office Memorandum of even numberdated 25-6-87 and as revised from time to time on submissionof bills (in duplicate) to this Department attaching therewiththe attendance certificate issued by the respective Courts.The allotment of the briefs of the cases will be'done by thisDepartment.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Ashok N. P. Dessai, Under Secretary (Law).

Panaj i, 21 st October, 1999.

Order

No. LS/I 077/93

'The Government of Goa, is pleased to appoint AdvocatePranay Anant Kamat and Advocate Shri Sheikh Vahidulla,as Additional Government Advocates, to appear in the mattersQefore the High Court of Jii'dicature at Bombay, Panaji BenchGoa with immediate effect and until further orders.

They will be paid as per the existing terms and conditionsas contained in this Department's Office Memorandum dated

88716TH MARCH,. 2000

8-5-1989, as applicable to the Additional Government Advocates.



Panaji, 17th December 1999.

Notification

No. 5-40-2000/LD (Estt.)

In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3'of theNotaries Act, 1952 (Central Act, 53 of1952) read with Rule7 of the Notaries Rules, 1956, the Government of Goa ispleased to appoint Shri Shrikant Bhikaro Parab, as a Notaryfor a period offive years in Judicial Division of Ponda Talukawith effect from 29-2-2000.


Ashok NP. Dessai, Under Secretary (Law).

Panaji, 29th February, 2000.

Notification

No. 5-40~99/LD (ii)

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of theNotaries Act, 1952 (Central Act, 53 of 1952) read with Rule(7) of the Notaries Rules, 1956,Jhe Goverriment of Goa ispleased to appoint Shri Ashok P. Naik, as Notary fora periodof five years in Ponda Taluka with effect from 25-10-1999.



Panaji, 25th October, 1999.

-.-...--

Department of Labour

Order

No. CL/3-11/(39)/99/90

Whereas an industrial dispute is purported to exist between the management of Mis. Marmagoa Steel Limited.Curtorim, Salcete-Goa, and their workmen represented byMarmagoa Steel Employees Union (hereinafter called the'said parties'), in respect of the matter specified in the

. Schedule annexed hereto (hereinafter called the 'said dispute');

And whereas the said parties have jointly applied in theprescribed manner for a reference of the said dispute to theIndustrial Tribunal in terms of sub-section (2) of section I0

~~8

SERIES J] No. 51OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA

16TH MARCH, 2000

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947)(hereinafter called the 'said Act');

And whereas the Government of Goa is satisfied that thepersons applying represent the majority ofeach party.

Now, therefore, in exerC'ise of the powers conferred bysub-section (2) of section 10 of the said Act, the Governmentof Goa hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to theIndustrial Tribunal of Goa, at Panaji Goa, constituted unders~ction 7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"( I) Whether the action ofthe managementofMis. MarmagoaSteel Limited, Curtorim-Goa, in dismissingfrom the services thefollowing 6 workmen on the dat~ shown against their names,is legal and justified'?

(1) Mr. B. Besavaraj with effect from 2-9-1999

(2) Mr. Caetano J. Fernandes with effect from 2-9-1999

(3) Mr. CaetanoN. Fernandes with effect from 2-9-1999

(4) Mr. Concessao Hilario with effect from 2-9-1999

(5) Mr. Duiz Mourya with effect from 2-9-1999

(6)~r.PrakashPatil with effect from 2-9-1999

(2) If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled '?"


R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour and Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.

Panaji, 4th January, 2000,.

Order

No. CL/3-11l (40)/99/114

Whereas an industrial dispute is purported to exist between the management of Mis. Marmagoa Steel Limited,Curtorim, Salcete-Goa, and their workmen represented byMarmagoa Steel Employees" Union (hereinafter called the'said parties'), in respect of the matter specified in theSchedule annexed hereto (hereinafter called the 'said dispute');

SCHEDULE

"(1) whether the action ofthe management ofMis. MarmagoaSteel Ltd., Curtorim, in declaring lock-qut with effectfrom 20-8-99, 22-8-99 and 23-8-99 ofSMS, RM and QCdepartments, is legal and justified '?

(2) whetherthe action of the management ofMis. MarmagoaSteel Limited, in insisting upon individual workman tosign and give a request letterto the management as a precondition to allow them to resume work, is legal andjustified '?

(3) Ifthe answer to the pointe I) and q) above are in negative,what relief are the workmen entitled to ?"


R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labor and Ex-Officio JointSecretary.

Panaji, 5th January, 2000

Order

No. CLlPub-Awards/98/1 08.

The following Award dated 14-12-1999 in ReferenceNo.IT/91/94 given by the Industrial Tribunal, Panaji.-Goa, ishereby published as required under the provisions ofSection 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act14 of 1947). .

By order andin thy name of the Governor of Goa.

R. S. Mardolker, Ex-Officio Joint Secretary, Labour.

Panaji, 6th January, 2000

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Shri Ajit J. Agni, Hon'ble Presiding Officer)

Ref. No. IT/91/94

And whereas the said partie·s have jointly applied in theprescrih~d manner for a reference of the said dispute to theIndustrial Tribunal in terms of sub-section (2) of section 10of the Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947)(hereinafter called the 'said Act');

And whereas the Government of Goa is satisfied that thepersons applying represent the majority of each party.

Workmen Rep. byThe President,Hotel Employees Union,Dona Paula, Goa.

vis

M/s Cidade de Goa,Dona Paula, Goa.

. .. Workman/Party I

. .. Employer/Party II

,Now, theref'0re, in exercise of the powers conferred bysub-section (2) of section 10 of the said Act, the Governmentof Goa hereby refers the said disputl' fill' ad judication to theIndustrial Tribunal of Goa, at Panaji (i,>, .. , '''Iituted unders~ction 7-A ofthe said Act.

Workman/Party I-Represented by Shri V. Sawant.

Employer/Party II-Represented by Adv. Shri G. K.Sardessai.

Panaji, Dated. : 14-12-99.

SERIES II No. 51

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA 88916TH MARCH, 20()()

AWARD

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of subsection (1) of section. LO of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(Central Ac:t 14 of 1947) the Government ofC1oa by orderdated 10-8-94 beai'ing No. 28/25/94-LAB ~eferred the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

"Whether the demand of the workmen employed inMis Cidade de Goa, VainguinimBeacp, Dona Paula, Goa, for20% bonus for the accounting year .1992"93 is legal andjustified?

If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled ?"

2. On receipt of the re'fence a case was registered underNo. IT/91/94 and registered AID notice was issued to theparties. In pursuance to the said notice the parties put in theirappearance. The workman-Party I (for short, "Union") filedits statement of claim at Exb.3.The facts of the case in briefas pleaded by the union are that it is the sole representativeunion of the workmen of the Employer-Party II (for short,"employer") and its registration is No. 21 f/84. That theemployer paid 8.33% bonus to the confirmed workmen underthe Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 for the accounting year1991-92 as demanded by the union vide its letter ofdemanddated 27th July, 1992. That thus the employer refused to paythe balance 11.67% + 10% ex-gratia payment to the workmenthough the employer had successful and encouraging financialresults and gross profits for the accounting year 1991-92. Thatthe union raised an industrial dispute before the Labour Commissioner vide letter dated 12-12-92 demanding 20% max. annualbonus for the accounting year 1991-92 as well as 10% ex-aratiab

payment. That the 8.33% minimum bonus which the employerpaid to the workmen sometime in the 3rd week ofNovember 1992was accepted by the workmen under protest. That'in order todeprive the workmen of the said bonus and ex-gratia paymentthe employer showed in the balance sheet fictitious losses andexpenditures. The union relied upon the balance sheet and profitand loss account for the year 1991-92 of the employer as wellas the halance sheet and profit and loss accounts for theaccounting year 88-89,89-90 and 90-91. The union claimed thatthe employer should be directed to pay to the workmen-the bonus@ 20% and ex-gratia payment @ 10% for the accounting year91-92. .

3 .. The employer filed writen statement at Exb. 5. By wayof preliminary objection the employer contended that thedispute does not survive because the workmen have accepted bonus. of 8.33% for the accounting year 91-92. Theemployer also contended that the payment for bonus is notespoused by the substantial number of workmen and therefore there being no industrial dispute the reference is liableto be rejected. The employer stated that the union has noright to raise the dispute as it does not represent majorityof the workmen nor a substantial section. The employerdenied that the union is the sole representative union of allthe workmen employed with tlfe employer. The employerstated that all the workmen who were entitled to bonus underthe Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 were paid bonus @ 8.33%which was due and payable under the Act for the accountin a

. b

year 91-92 and the workmen accepted the payment without

any reservation whatsoever and in full and 'final settlementof their claim for bonus for the accountinli. year ending91-92 and thus they have no dispute wh~tsoever. Th~employer stated that the demand of the union for 20% bonusdoes not have any support from the workmen of theemployer. The employer denied that they had highly successful and encouraging financial season and gross profit for theaccounting year 91-92. The employer stated that they madealoss of 7.8 lakhs as shown in the profit and loss account.T~e employer denied any .knowledge that by letter dated12-12-92 the union raised an industrial dispu'te before theLabour Commissioner or that the said letter dated 12-12-92was sent tp the conciliation officer. The employer denied thatthe employer has shown in the balance sheet fictitious lossesand expenditure as contended by the union. The employerdenied that false, non existent and unreasonable expenditures have been deducted from the gross profit as contendedby the union. The employer stated that the expenditure isjustified, fair and proper. The employer stated that they havestrictly complied with the methodology of calculation underthe Act and there being no allocable surplus whatsoever theemployer has rightly paid the statutory bonus of 8.33%. Theemployer stated that in view of the proper and legitimatecalculations no bonus whatsoever is due and payable overand above what has been statutarilly paid in the accountingyear 91-92 and therefore the reference deserves to berejected. The Union thereafter filed rejoinder at Exb. 6.

4. On the pleadings of the parties, following issues wereframed atExb.7.

I. Whether the Party I proves that it is the sole representativeunion of the workmen employed by Party II and hence it isauthorised to raise the Industrial Dispute?

2. Whether the Party I proves that the demand for 20%bonus is espoused by substantial number of workmen andhence the reference is maintainable?

3. Whetherthe Party I proves that its demand for 20% bonusfor the accounting year 1992-93 is legal and iustifi~d ?

4. Whether the Party II proves that the dispute does notsurvive because of the acceptance of 8.33% bonus by theworkmen of the Party II for the accounting year 1991-92 ?

5. Whether the Party I is entitled to any relief?

6. What Award or order?

5. My' findings on the issues are as follows:

Issue No.1 In the negative.

Issue No.2 In the negative.

S90SERIES 1/ No. 51

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA16TH MARCH, 2000

REASONS

6. Issue Nos. 1 and 2: Both these issues are taken upl\)gether as they are interrelated since the union had contended that it is the sole. representative of the workmenl'l11ployedwith the employer and therefore it is authorisedtu raise the industrial dispute and since this contention ofthe union was denied by the employer, the burden was onthe union to prove its sole representing character. It was alsothe contention of the union that the demand for 20% bonusI, espoused by substantial number of workmen and thereforelhe reference is mail1tainable which contention was deniedh) the employer and therefore the burden was on the unionto prove this contention also. The union has examined itsGen. Secretary Shri John Rego and its President Shri Jaoquim(Jomes and their deposition is on record. E)(cept for making~l bare statement that about 240 employees are presently themembers of the union and at the time when the dispute wasraised about 180 employees of the employer were the memhers of the union, no documentary evidence in support ofits contention has been produced by the union. In the crossexamination of Shri John Rego the employer had denied the(ontention of the said witness that the employees of theemployer are the members of the said union. In the crossexamination of the witness Shri Joaquim Gomes also theemployer had denied that at the time when the demand wasmade 180 employees were the members of the said union. Inview of the stand taken by the employer as regards themembership of the union it was incumbent on the union toproduce some documentary evidence to prove that at the timewhen the demand was made 180 employees were the membersof the said union or that atleast a substantial number of theemployees of the employer were its members. The union alsohas not produced any documentary evidence to. show thatan extraordinary General Body Meeting was held on 7-11-92for demanding 20% bonus and ex-gratia payment. In theabsence of any evidence on the part of the union the issuenos. I and 2 cannot be answered in favour of the union. I,therefore hold that the union has failed to prove that it is.the sole representative union of the workmen emproyed bythe employer or that the demand for 20% bonus wasespoused by asubstantil number of workmen. I, thereforeanswer the issue nos. I and" 2 in the negative.

7. Issue No.3: On this issue the union has examined itsPresident Shri J. Gomes and its General Secretary Shri JohnRego. It is the contention of the union that the workers ofthe employer are entitled to 20% bonus. As per the order Ofreference dated 10-8-84 the dispute which has been referredis as regards-the demand of the workmen for 20% bonus forthe accounting year 1992-93 and whether the said demandis legal and justified. In the statement of. claim filed by thebnJon, the union has made the pleadings 'on the legality andjustifiability of the demand for 20% bonus for the accountingyear 1991-92 and not for the accounting year 1992-93. Thewitnesses examined by the union also have deposed asregards their demand for 20% bonus for the accounting yearY1-92 and not for the accounting year 92-93. Therefore thepleadings made by the union as well as the evidence whichhas been led by the union are besides the order of referencei.e. to say that the dispu'te referred by the Government ison one issue whereas the pleadings and the evidence which

has been led by the union are on a different issue. Evenotherwise no evidence has been led by the union in supportof its claim for 20% bonus. In the light of what is discussedabove, I hold that the union has failed to prove that itsdemand for 20% bonus for the accounting year 92-93 is legaland justified. I, therefore, answer the issue no. 3 in thenegative.

8. Issue No.4: The employer had contended that the dispute does not survive in view {)f the acceptance of 8.330/<bonus by the workmen of the employer for the accountingyear 1991-92. I have already mentioned earlierthat the employerhas not led any evidence in the matter. Even otherwise, inmy view giving the finding on this issue does not arisebecause the dispute as regards payment of bonus pertainsto the accounting year 1992-93' whereas the employ~r hasreferred to the payment of bonus of 8.33% for year 1991-92.Giving the finding on this issue will amount to travellingbeyond the scope of reference which is not permissible underthe law. I, therefore hold that giving finding whether thedispute does not survive because of the acceptance of 8.33 07(;

bonus by the workmen of the employer for the accountingyear 91-92 does not arise. Hemce, I answer. the issue noAaccordingly.

9. Issue No.5: Since it has been held by me that the unionhas failed to prove that its demand for 20% bonus for theaccounting year 92-93 is legal and justified the question ofgranting any reliefto the workmen does not arise. I, thereforehold that the workmen are not entitled to any relief.

In the circumstances I pass the following order.

o.RDER

It is hereby held that the demand of the workmen employedin MlsCidade de Goa, Vainguinim Beach, Dona Paula, Goafor 20% bonus for the accounting year 1992-93 is not legaland justified. It is hereby further held that the workmen arenot entitled to any relief.

No order as to costs. Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-(AJIT1. AGNI)

Presiding OfficerIndustrial-Tribunal.

Order

No. CL/3-11 I( 10)(2)/43/99/209

Wherea1"an industrial dispute is purported to exist between the management of Mis. Marmagoa Steel Limited,Curtorim, Sa1cete-Goa, and their workman represented byMarmagoa Steel Employees Union (hereinafter called the"saiE! parties"), in respect of the matter specified in theSchedule annexed hereto (hereinafter called the 'said dispute');

And whereas of the said parties have jointly applied inthe prescribed manner for a reference of the said dispute to

SERIES II No. 51

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA 89116'TH IyJARCH, 2000

'~

the Industrial Tribunal in terms of sub-section(2) of section10 of the Industrial Disputes Act: 1947 (Central Act 14 of1947) (hereinafter called the 'said Act');

And whereas the, Government of Goa is satisfied thatthepersons applying represent the, majority of each party.

Now, therefore, in exercise oflhe powers conferred by,sub-section (2) of section 10 of the said Act, the Governmentof Goa hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to theIndustrial Tribunal of Goa, atPanaji-Goa, constituted undersection 7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"( I) Whether the action of th,e Management of Mis.Marmagoa Steel Limited, Curtorim (Employer), in dismissingfrom the services of the following 2 workmen on the datesshown against their names, is legal and justified:

(I) Shri Santaraj Prasad Jaiswal, w. e. f. 29-07-99.

(2) Shri Harischandra Yadav, with effect from29-07-99.

(2) If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled?"


R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour and Ex-officioJoint Secretary.

Panaji, 12th January, 2000.

Order

No.CL/3-11 /( I0)(2)/42/991208.

Whereas an Industrial dispute is puported to exist between the management.tof Mis. Marmagoa Steel Limited,Curtorim, Salcete-Goa and their workman represented byMarmagoa Steel Employees Uni0n (hereinafter called the'said Parties'), in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule annexed hereto (hereinafter called the 'said dispute');

And whereas the said parties have jointly applied in theprescribed manner for a reference of the said dispute .to theIndustrial Tribunal in terms of sub-section (2) of Section 10of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947)(hereinafter called the 'said Act');

And whereas the Government of Goa is satisfied that thepersons applying represent the majority of each party.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred bysub-section(2) of section 10 of the said Act, the Governmentof Goa hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to theIndustrial Tribunal of Goa, at.Panaji-Goa, constituted undersection 7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"(I) Whether the action of the Management of Mis.MarmagoaSteel Limited, Curtorim (Employer), in dismissingfrom the services of the following workman on the date shownagainst his name islegal and justified?

Mr. Alex C. Rodrigues, with effect from 01-07-1999.

(2) If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?".


R. S~ Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour and Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.


Order

No. IRM/CON-MAP/(26)/98/207

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the. opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between the management of Mis.Automobile Corporation ofGoa Limited, Honda, Sattar; G~a.

and their workman, Shri Suresh Gawas, represented by the:Goa Trade and Commercial Workers' Union, Panaji, in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule aimexed hereto(hereinafter referred to as the 'said dispute');

And whereas the Government of Goa considers it expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred byclause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the IndustrialDisputes Act, 194] (Central Act 14 of 1947) thereinafterreferred to as the 'said Act'), the Governent of Goa herebyrefers the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa, at Panaji-Goa, constituted under 7-A of thesaid Act.

SCHEDULE..

"(1) Whether the action of the management of Mis.Automobile Corporation ofGoa Limited, Honda-Sattari, Goa inrefusing employment to Shri Suresh Gawas, workman witheffect from 27-4-1998 is legal andjustified?

(2) If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?".


R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour&Ex-OfficioJointSecretary.


Order

No. IRM/CON-MAP/(4)/98/99/206

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that an,Industrial dispute exists between the manag~ment of Mis.

892SERIES 11 No. 51


Panaji, J2th January, 2000.

(2) If not, what relief the workmen are entitled to'?"

. By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner; Labour and Ex-officioJoint Secretary.

Kadamba Transport Corporation Limited, Panaji-Goa, andtheir workman Shri Sham S. Gawas, in respect of the matterspecified.in the schedule annexed hereto (hereinafter referredto as the 'said dispute');

And whereas, the Government of Goa cOnsidei's itexpedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred byclause (d) of sub-section (I) of section 1Oof the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947)(hereinafterreferred to as the 'said Act') the Government of Goa herebyrefers the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa, at Panaji-Goa, constituted under section7-A of the said Act.

J. ShriSunilNaik:

2. Shri DeepakMaakaikar.

3. Shri YeshwantNaik.

4. Shri Gurudas Mulli.

5. Mrs. Sujata Sambary.

6. Ms. Geeta Naik.

7. Ms. Sarita Raikar.

8. Ms. Yasmin Sheikh.,.

SCHEDULE

"( I)Whether the action ofthe management ofMis. KadambaTransport Corporation Limited, Panaji-Goa, in terminating theservices of Shri Sham S. Gawas, Assistant Mechanic, w.eJ.1-12-1997 is legal andjustified?'

(2) If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

By o'rder and in the ~ame of the Governor of Goa.


Panaji, 12th January. 2000.

Order

No. IRM/CON/SG/(40)/99/205

Whereas the Government of Goa is ot'the opinion that anIndustrial duspute exists between the management of MIs.Beverage Vel1'tures Limited, Arlem, Goa and their 8 workmenrepresented by the Goa Trade and Commercial Workers Unioni,n respect of the matter specified in the Schedule annexedhereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'said dispute');

"

And whereas the Government of Goa considers it expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication~

'Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred byclause (d) of sub-section (I) of sec'tion 10 of the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred to as the ''Said Act'), the Government of Goa herebyrefers the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa. at Panaji-Goa, constituted under section7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

" (I) Whether the action of the management ofM/s.Beverage Ventures Limited, Arlem-Goa, in terminatingthe services of the following 8 workmen w.e.f. 8-7-1999is legal and justified.

Order

No. IRM/CON-MAP/( 14 J )/99/743

Whereas the Government of Go~ is of the opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between the management of MIs.Goa Quality Lamp Cap's, Karaswada, Thi vim, Bardez-Goa andtheir workman Shri Digambar V. Arporkar in respect of thematter specified in the Schedule annexed hereto (hereinafterreferred to as the 'said dispute');

And whereas the Government of Goa considers it expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred byclause (d) of sub-section (]) of section ]0 of the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 (Centra] Act J4 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred to as the "said Act"), the Government of Goa herebyrefers the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa, at Paooji-Goa, constituted under section7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

" (I) Whether the action of the management of Mis. GoaQuality Lamp Cap's, Thivim Industrial Estate, Thivim, Goa, interminating the services of their workman Shri. Digambar V.Arporkar, with effect from 4-12-1988, is legal and justified?

(2) Ifnot,to what reliefthe workman is entitled'?".

By order and in the name of the Governor Goa.

R. S, Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour and Ex-officioJoint Secretary.


Corrigendum

No. CLIESIIH/97/ESI/9985

Read: Order No. CLiESI/H/97/ESII355 dated 6-1-98.

The date of issue of the above order may please be readas 6-1-99 instead of 6-1-98.


Panaji, 31st Man;h, 1999.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OFGOASERIES II No. 51

89316TH MARCH, 20()()

Addendum

No. CLlESI(PFG-27)/1 742

Read: Order No. CLiESI-H/97/ESI/866 I dtd .. 14c5-1998.

4: Saligao

2 3

Francis XavierPascoaJ.Rodrigues, 3211A, Muddavado, Saligao, Bardez.

4

III.

The following para stands added at theendof the abovementioned order.

.. Dr. (Mrs.) M. B. Bakhle shall be on probation .for aperiod of two years".


5. Saligao

6.. Sangolda

RanjanaRamakantAsvekar.Sonarbhat, Saligao,Bardez-Goa. VII.

Nilkant Anand Mahapasekar.3-1, Barroswaddo, Sangolda.Bardez. 1.

R. S. Mardolker.Commissioner ofLabour and Ex"OfficioJL Secretary.

Panaji, 19th June, 1999.

--+++--

7. Verla-Canca. Melba Olympio Marcus.44-Sonarwaddo. Verla-Canca,Bardez-Goa. N.

Ponda BlockITaluka

Departme!1t of Panchayati Raj andCommunity Development

Directorate of Panchayats

8. Panchwadi Audhut Poku Naik, Amblai,Panchawadi.

9. Tivrem-Orgao VaishaliVinayakZalmi,Tivrem-Orgao.

l.

I.

Notification

No. 19/3 1IDP/PANlElectlMemberl97

10. Wadi-Talaulim AmitaaliasBharatiNam40Naik, Kanswaddo-Taiaulim. Vi

In 'pursuance of sllb-section (8) of section 7 of the GoaPanchayat Raj Act, 1994 (Goa Act 14 of 1999) read with sub-rule(1) of Rule58 ofthe Goa Panchayat and ZillaPanchayat (ElectionProcedure) Rules, 1996, it is hereby notified for the information ofthe public that the persons specified in column No. 3 of theschedule appended hereto have been duly elected as member ofthe panchayat mentioned in corresponding entry in columnNo. 2 from the wards shown against their names in columnNo.4 ofthe said schedule in the bye-election heldon 21-11- i999.

SCHEDUlE

Tiswadi BlockITaluka.

11. Chimbel Chandravati ChandrakantKunkolkar, H. No. 500/2,Goulembhat, Chimbel.

12. Corlim Alvito Jack Jose PiedadeRodrigues. H. No. 87.Volvado, Corlim-I1has-Goa.

Quepem BlockITaluka.

v.

VI.

Sr. No. Name of the Pancqayat Name and address Ward No .of the elec'ted inember

13. Caurem-Pirla Parvati Shankar GaunkarCaurem-Pirla. IV.

2 3 4

Safari -BlockITaluka

I. Queti.m Shri Rajaram ArjunMahalakar, Baheri1wada,Querim-Goa. III.

14. Fatorpa-Quitol Altone Cruz D'Costa,H.No.19,Cot~o.

Fatorpa-Goa.

Mormugao Block/Taluka

1.

Lourenco Santan Mesquita,H. No.8, Consua. Cortalim. IX.

Anastina Alfredo Colaco,H. No. 43, Odlem-Bhat,Dabolim. II.

. Bardez BlockITaluka

2. Aldona

3. Moira

Jose· Francis JoaquimD' Souza,H.No. 1040,P.O. Carona, Aldona,Bardez"Goa.

Pandurang Eknath Chari835-Bambordem, Moira,Bardez-Gqa.

1.

iII.

15. Chicalim

16. Chicalirn

17. Cor.limQuelossim

Raul Caitano D'Costa,H. No. 112, Zina,Chicalim-Goa. x

X94SERIES II No. 51

Salcete BlockITaluka


Notification

·.18.Cana-Bemlulim

19.Cannona

20. CUItorim

21. Varca.

Trevor Jolly Pinto,H.No.1278,Mazilvado,Benaulim. X

Oxler Antonio Furtado,H. No. 100, Igreja, Carmona. m.John Joaquim Rodrigues,H. No. 1152, Muxivaddo,CUItOlim. vrn.

Romy Xavier Gracias,H.No.665, IstFatrade,Varca. VII.

No. 19/32IDPIPAN/SARP-DY:SARP/98/146

In pursuance of sub-section (I) of Section 46 of the Goa

PanchayatRaj Act, 1994 (Goa Act 14 of 1994~ it is hereby notified

for the information of the public thafthe member mentioned in

column. no. 4 of the Scheduleherebelo,w ha~e been

elected as Dy. Sarpanch to the Panchayat ·mentioned in

the corresponding entry No.2 of the said schedule in the meeting'

held on 5-1-2000.

SCHEDULE

22. Verna. Tony Sebasteao D'Costa,H. No. 106. Moroa, Vermi. III.

Sr.No.

Name ofPanchayal

• 2

Name and Addressof Sarpanch

Name & Addressof Dy. Sal1ianch

4

23. Telaulim Jao Philip D'Costa,H.No. 379,Coldem, Telaulim. ill.

Sanguem BlockITaluka

24. Calay Khutikar Laximikant Sukdo,.Thorlemola, Calem. V.

G. G. Kambli, Director of Panchayats.

Panaji, 25th November, 1999.

I. Chicolna-Bogmalo. Mormugao Block

K. N. S.· Nair, Director of Panchayats.

Panaji, 21st January, 2000,

Notification

Smt. LudovinaD'Cruz, H. No.615, Palimand.Bogmalo,Mormugao.

Notification

No.19/32/DPIPAN/SARP-DY. SARP/98/145


PanchayatR<u Act, 1994 (Goa Act 140f 1994) itishereby notified

for the information of the public that the member mentioned in

c'olumn no. 3 of the Schedule herebelow have been elected as

Sarpanch to the Panctiayat mentioned in the corresponding entry

No.2 of the said schedule in the meeting held on 5-1-2000.

SCHEDULE

No. 19/32IDP/PAN/SARP-DY. SARP/981l47

In pursuance of sub-sect~on (I) of Section 46. of the Goa

Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (Goa Act 14 of 1994) it is hereby

notified for the information of the public that the member

mentioned in column no. 4 of the Schedule herebelow have

elected as Dy. Sarpanch to the .panchayat mentioned in

the corresponding entry' No.2 of the said schedule in the

meeting held on 4-1-2000.

SCHEDULE

Name ofPanchayal


Name & Addressof Dy. Sarpanch

4

Sr. Name ofNo. Panchayal

NUipe and Addressof Sarpanch

Name & Address ofDy. SarpancR

4

I. GuirimBardez Block

Shri Prakash LaximanNaik. Vancio Waddo,(itlirim, Bardez-Goa.

I. AssonoraBardezBlock

Shrl Eknath ShivaBanaulikar. H. No.115,Bhandarwada, Assonora.

.K. N. S. Nair. Director of Panchayats.

Panaji. 21st January. ~090'

K. N. S. Nai'i DirectOl: of Panchayats.

Panaji, 21st January, 2000.

SERIES II No. 51

Notification

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA 89516TH MARCH. 2000

Notifi.cation

No: 19/32/DPIPANiSARP-DY. SARP/98/148

In pursuance of sub-section (1) of Section 46. of the G~a

Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (Goa Act 140f 1994)itis hereby notified

for the information of the public that the member mentioned in

column no. 4 of the Schedule herebelow have been

elected as Dy. Sarpanch to the Panchayat mention~d in

the corresponding entry No.2 of the said schedule in the meeting

held on 4-1-2000.

SCHEDULE

No. 19/32/DPIPAN/SARP-DY. SARP/98/l50


Panchayat Raj. Act, 1994 (Goa Act 14 of 1994) it is hereby

notified fo~ the information of the public that the member

.mentioned in column no. 30f the Schedule herebelow have

been elected as Sarpanch to the Panchayat mentioned iA

the corre.sponding entry No. 2 of the said schedule in the


SCHEDULE

Sr.No.

Name ofPanchayat

2

!'!ame and A-ddressof Sarpanch

3

Name & Address ofDy. Sarpanch

4

Sr.No.

Name ofP:tnchayat

2



4

K. N. S. Nair. Director of Panchayats.

I. CavelossimSaketeBlock

Shri MirandaLazarinhoAntonio Jose,H.No,76,Igrejawaddo,Cavelossim.

I. CansarvornemPernem Block

Smt. TaramatiDattaram Gad,Bailpur Cansarvornem.

K. N. S. Nair. Director of Panchayats.

Panaji, 2.1st January, 2000.

Notification

No. 19/32/DPIPAN/SARP-DY. SARP/98/149

In pursuance of sub-section (f) of Section 46 of the Goa



mentioned in column no. 30f the Schedule herebelow have been

elected as Sarpanch to the Panchayat mentioned inI .

the corresponding entry No. 2 of the said schedule in the


SCHEDULE

Panaji, 21st January, 2000.

Notification

No. 19/32/DPIPAN/SARP-DY.·SARP/98/151

In pursua~ce of sub-section (I) of Section 46 of the Goa



mentioned in co,lumn no. 3 of the Schedule herebelow have been

elected as Sarpanch to the Panchayat mentioned in



SCHEDULE

Sr. Name ofNo. Panchayat

2


3


4


2


3


4

I. TelaulimSalceteBlock

Shri Ansusao FranciscoFerrao, H. No. 208,Cantem, Telaulim,Salcete-Goa.

I. ChimbelTiswadi Block

Smt. ChandravatiChandrakant Kunkolkar.H. No. 502,Chimhel.Tiswadi-Goa.

K. N. S. Nair. Dirct'lor of Panchayats,

Panaji, 21 st Januar). 2000.

K. N. S. /VIIi,., Director of Pam:havats.

Panaji, 21 st January. 2000.

896SERIES-ll No. 51

Notification

OFFICIAL GAZETIE~ GOVT. OF GOA16TH MARCH. 2000

Notification


In pursuance of sub-section (1) of Section 46 of the Goa.

Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (Goa Act 14 of I994)itis hereby

notified for the infOrmation of the public that the 'member

'.l1enlioned in column no. 4 of, the Schedule .herebelow havebeen elected as Dy. Sarpanch to the Panchayat mentioned in

the corresponding entry No.2 of the said schedule in the


SCHEDUlE

No. 19/32/DPIPAN/SARP-DY. SARP/98/536


Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (Ooa Act 14 of i994) it is hereby



been elected as Sarpanch to the Panchayat mentioned in

• the corresponding €ntry No. 2 of the said schedule in the


SCHEDULE

Name and Address. Name & Address ofof Sarpanch Dy. 'Sarpanch

Sr.No.

Name ofPanchayat.

2 3 4


2


3


4

I. Saligao.Bardez Block

Smt. RanjanaRarnakantAsvekar, SonarBhat, Saligao,Bardez-Goa.

I. Raia.Salcete Block

Shri Manuel Inacio

Cardozo, H. No. 6212,

Arlem, Raia

Salcete', Goa.

K. N.. S. Nair, Director of Panchayats.

Panaji, 21st Januar:5', 2000.

Notification



Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (Gba Act 14 of 1994) it is hereby




the corresponding entry No'" 2 of the said schedule in themeeting held on 19-J -2000.

SCHEDULE

G. G. Kambli, I)irector of Panchayats.

Panaji; 16th February, 2000.

Notification

No. I9/32/DPIPAN/SARP-DY. S t\RPA)8/537



notified for the information of the public tha! the member


been elected. as Sarpanch to the Panchayat. mentioned in

the cOITesponding entry No. 2 of the said schedule in the


SCHEDULE·Sr. Name ofNo. Panchayal

2

I. Fatorpa-OuittolQuepem Block


3

Shri Altone.Cruz·D'Costa,H.No.19,Cotto-Fatorpa.

Name & Address ofDy.Sarpanch

4Sr. Name of

. No. Panchayat

2

l. CurrorimSalceteBlock


3

Smt. VeenaBrunoLourenco, Batora,Curtorim, Saleete.

. Name & Address .ofDy. Sarpanch

4

G. G. Kambli, DirestorofPanchayats. G. Kambli, Director of Panchayats,.

j::

I!

Panaji, 16th February, 2000. Panaji, 16th February, :?OOO.

\.

SERIES II No. 51

Notification

OFFICIAL GAZE'FfE----:- GOY!. OFQOA 89716TH MARCH. 2000

Notificatio~

No.19/32/DP/PAN/SARP~DY. SARP/98/538

In pursuance of su.b-section (l) of Section 46 of the Goa

Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (Goa Act 14 of1994) it is hereby


mentioned in column no, 3 of the Schedule herebelow have

ljeen elected as Sarpanch and Dy .• Sarpan~h to the Panchayat

mentioned in the correspof!ding entry No.2 of the said schedule

in the meeting held on 21 cl-2000,

SCHEDur.E

NO.19/32/DP/PAN/SARP-DY. SARP/98/540

In pursuance of sub-section ( I) of Section 46 of the Goa


notified for the information of the. public that t~ ~emher


beenoelected as Sarpanch. to the Panchayat me.ntioned !n


m~eting'held on 24-1-2000.

SCHEDUIE

Sr. Name ofNo. . Panchayat

2

Name and' Addressof Sarpanch

3


4


2


3·

. Name & Address ofDy. Sarpanch

4

I. CalemSanguem Block

Mrs. PramilaMahabluKargutkar, CuinamolCalem, Sang!1~m, "

Mr. Injo Navlo .Yarakrio. CaryamolCalem.

I. St. Lowrence

Tiswadi Block

Shri Salvador Jose Dias

H. No. 503, Mercurim,

Agassaim, Goa.

G. G. Kambli. Director of Panchayats.


Notification

No.19/32/DP/PAN/SARP-DY. SARP/98/539

In pursuance of sub-section (1) of Section 46 of the Goa

Pan.chayat Raj Act, 1994 (Goa Act 14 of 1994) it is hereby

nqtified for the information of the public that the member



the correspond\ng entry -!NQ. 2 of the said schedule in the

. meeting held on 14-1-2000.

SCHEDUIE

. G. G. Kambli. Direc.tor of Panchayats.


Notification

NO.19/32/DP/PAN/SARP-DY. SARP/98/541

In pursuance of sub-section (I) of Section. 46 of the Goa

Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (Goa Act 14 of 1994) it.is hereby

notified for the information of the public that tIf member

mentioned in .column no. 3 of the Schedule herebelow hr}'e

been elected as SaI'panch to the Panchayat mentioned in

the.cOl'feSponding entry No. 2 of the said schedule in the

meetjng held on 4-1-2000.

Sr. Name ofNo.. Panchayat

2


3

Name & Address ofDy_ Sarpanch

4 Sr. Name ofNo. Panchayat

SCHEDUIE

Name and AddressofSarpanch

Name & Address of·Dy. Sarpanch

I. VelguemBicholim Block

Shri Dattaram DevidasShirodkarrio..Sidharth Marg,Yelguem,Gpa.

2

I. St. EstevamTiswadiBlbck

3

Shri Orlando DomingoMenezes, Fbro,St. Estevam, Tiswadi .

4

..G. G.Kambli"Pirector of Panchayats.

P'maj.i, 16th February, 2000.

G. G. KaJnbli! Director of Panchayats.

Panaj i, 16th February; 2009..

898SERIES 1/ No. 51

OFFICIAL GAZE'ITE - GOVT. OF GOA16TH MARCH. 2000

Department of Personnel

Order

No.7/2/99-PER

Shri Sanjiv Khirwar, lAS, Collector (North) shall hold thecharge of the post of Director of Vigilance in addition to hisown duties with immediate effect and until further ordersthereby relieving Shri A. Dessai of tbe additional charge.


Armando Mascarenhas. Joint Secret~ry (Personnel).

Panaji, 11th January. 2000.

Order

No.6/4/98-PER

Dr. M. Modassir. Goa Civil Service Officer is posted asJoint Secretary (Higher Education) withimmedate effectthereby relieving Shri G. J. Prabhudesai of the additionalcharge.


Armando Mascarenhas. Joint Secretary (Personnel).

Panaji, IlthJanuary. 2000.

Order

No.7/8174-PER (Vol. I)

Read: order No. 7-8-74-PER (Vol. II) dated 6-7-1999.

Government is pleased to repatriate Dr. Susanll M. L. J.De Souza, Executive Director, Sports Authority ofGoa, Panajito the post of Director of Sports and Youth Affairs withimmediate effect.

2. Shri V. M. Prabhudessai;,Deputy Director of Sports andYouth Affairs, Directorate of Sports & Youth Affairs, Panaji,is transferred and posted as Executive Director, SportsAuthority of Goa: on deputation, wi.th immediate effect.

3. The Deputation of Shri V. M. Prabhudessai shall begoverned by the standard terms of deputation as containedin O. M. No. 13/4/74-PERdated 12-2-19~9 read with O. M.·No. I3/4/74-PER dated 5-1"2000. --

4. Shri Eustaquio Pereira, Deputy DirectQr of Sports &Youth Affairs, stands relieved of the post of Director ofSports & Youth Affairs and Executive Director, SportsAuthority of Goa with immediate effect.


J. S. Monteiro, Under Secretary (Personnel).


Order

No. 5/40/84-PER

Read: i) Gov~rnment Order No. 5/40/84-PER dated27~11-1996.

ii) GovernmentOrderNo. 26/6/IIDTE/96-97/348 dated29-1-1999..

Consequent upon expiry of lien period, Government ispleased to repatriate Dr. A. R. Naik, Principal, GovernmentPolytechnic, Curchotem to his post of Professor in IndustrialEngineering .and Head of Mechanical Engineering Department in the Goa College of El}gineering, Farmagudi; withimmediate effect.

Dr. A. R. Naik' shall hand over the charge of the post ofPrincipal, Government Polytechnic, Curchorem to Shri VivekKamat, Head ofDepartment in Mechanical Engineering, GOVe .ernment Polytechnic , Curchorem, who shall officiate asPrincipal, Government Polytechnic, Curchorem in addition tohis own duties from the date of taking over charge and untilfurther orders: •




Order

No.31/8/86-PER-Vol.lI

Shri N. S. Navti, Mamlatdar, Pernem shall hold the chargeof the post of Chief Officer, Pernem Municipal Council,Pernem i.n addition to his own duties with immediate effectthereby relieving Shri A. P. Halarnkar of the additionalcharge.


Armando Mascarenhas, Joint Secretary (Personnel).


Order

No. 15/2/86:PER

The following transfers/postings of the officers in. thecadre of MamlatdarlJoint Mamlatdar are hereby ordered withimmediate effect:-

Sr. Name of the Officer Present post Posted onNo. transfer

2 3 4

1. Shri Suresh P. Joint Mamlatdar, Mamlatdar,Pilernekar Tiswadi Tiswadi.

2. Shri Gopal ~arsekar Mamlatdar, JointTiswadi Mamlatdar.

Ponda.

3. Shri Sanjeev C. Joint Mamlatdar, JointGauns Desai . Ponda Mamlatdar

Tiswadi.

SERIES II No. 51

2. Shri Pilernekar shall move first.

oFFIciAi.. GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA

Order

899J6TH MARCH, 2000

By order and in the name of the Governor of6.oa.


Panaji, 21st February, 2000.

No. 22/7J96-PER

Read: Government Order No. 2217/96-PER dated 28-1-1997.

Whereas on the recommendation of the Departmental Pro

motion Committee, the. Inspectors of police were promoted to

gradeII posts ofUoa Police Service, vide Order referred to above.

No.7112/98-PER

Order'

G,pvernor of Goa is pleased to order the transfer andposti ng of the following Dy. Conservators of Forests, withimmediate effect:-


51.No.

l.

2.

Nal'ntl of the Officer &present posting

2

Smt. Archana. Singh,Dy. Ct>nservator ofForests (South).

Shri V. T. Thomas,Dy. Conservator ofForests(Planning &Statistics).

Posted on transfer

3

Dy. Conservator ofForests (Planning& Statistics).

Dy. Conservator ofForests (South).

And whereas the recommendation in respect of Shri J. O.

D'Souza in the above Departmental Promotion Committee was

kept in sealed cover because disciplinary proceedings for major

penalty had been initiated against the said Officer.

And whereas the Government of Goa, after careful consid

eration decided to drop the proceedings and an order to that

effect was issued vide No. 22110/96-PER dated 10-2-2000.

Now, Therefore, upon dropping the disciplinary proceedings

by' the Government of Goa and opening the recommendatjon

ofthe Departmental Promotion Committee contained in the sealed

cover in respect of Shri J. O. D'Souza, Grade II Offficer of Goa

Police Service, (Ad-hoc), the Governor of Goa is pleased to

promote Shri J. O. D'Souza under Rule 30 of Goa Police Service

Rules, 1973, as amended from time to time, to the Grade II post

of the said service on regular basis in the pay scale of

Rs. 2000-3500 (pre-revised) with etlect from 28/1/1997.


Panaji, 22nd February, 2000.

qrder

No. 6/9/91-PER

Shri D. C. Sahoo, Registrar of Coopera t .ve Societies shall

hold the charge of the post of Director of Municipal Admin

istration, Panaji in addition to his own duties. with immediate

. effect there-by relieving Shri K. N. S. Nair of the additional

charge.

Shri H. C. Khan, Joint Director of Accounts, P.W.D. shall

.look after the charge of the post of Director (Admn.), P.W.D.

in addition to his own duties, until further orders thereby

relieving Shri ·D. C. Sahoo of the additional charge.




Shri J.O. D'Souza's placing in the Order dated 28-1-1997 shallbe at Sr, No.3 below Shri C. G. J. Borges, as per the meritofDepartmental Promotion Committee. The serial numbers below

. Shri J. O. D'Souza will undergo change and may be readaccordingly.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa,


Panaji, I st March, 2000.

Corrigendum

No. 22/1 4/99-PER

Read: Government Order No. 22/ 14/99-PER dated 4-1-2000.

In the Government Order No. 22/14/99-PER dated 4-1-2000,the name and designation of the Officer mentioned thereinshall be corrected to read as "Shri Hargobinder SinghDhaliwal,".



Panaji, 11th Fehruary, 2000.

900SERIES If No. 51


Village : Bordem

Addendum

No. 22/14/99-PER

Read: i) Government Order No. 22114/99-PER dated4-1-2000.

ii) Corrigendum No. 22/14/99-PER dated11-2-2000.

In the Government Corrigendum No. 22!l4/99-PER datedI 1-2-2000. after the name ShriHargobinder Singh Dhaliwal, the·words "and S.D.P.O." shal1 be added.


Armando Mascarenhas, Joint Secretary (~ersonnel).

Panaji, 22nd February, 2000.

--+++--

Department of Revenue

. Notification

4. The Government further appoints, under clause (e) ofsection 3 of- the said Act, the Deputy Collector (LA),Collectorate of North Goa, Panaji. to perform the functionsof a Collecto;'tmder the said Act in respect of the said land.

5. The Government also authorises under sub-section (2)of section 4 of the said Act, the fol1owing Officers to do theActs, specified therein in respect of the said land.

1. The Collector, North Goa District, Panaji.2. Deputy Col1ector (LA), Col1ectorate of North Goa,

Panaji.3. Executive Engineer, W. D. XXIII, PWD, 3rd floor, Town

Centre Complex, Bicholim.. ,

4. Director of Settlement & Land Records, Panaji.

6. A rough plan of the said land is available for inspectionin the Office of Deputy Collector (LA), Collectorate of North,Panaji Goa for a period of 30 days from t!:le date of publicationof this Notification in the Official Gazette.

SCHEDULE

(Description of the said land)

Taluka : Bicholim

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa., .D. M. Borkar, Under Secretary (Revenue).


14114part 1. Shripad Damodar Kadkade. 10

2. Vinayak Damodar Kadkade.

3. Shridhar Bhikaji Sanzagiri.

4. Dattaram alias Indirabai

Giri Shankhawalkar.

5. Ramchandra Giri Kamat Shankhawalkar.

6. Pandurang Giri Kamat Shankhawalkar.

7. Pradip Giri Kamat Shankhawalkar.

8. Ajit Giri Kamat Shankhawalkar.

9. Yesubai Giri Kamat Shankhawalkar.•10. Rekha Giri Kamat Shankhawalkar.

Other rights : Gurunath Vishnu Fageri.-

141/3 part 1. Shashikant Jaiwant Sardessai. 200

2. Espy P. O.

142/1 part \.. Armando D'Souza. 100

Boundaries

North : S. No. 141/4, 3, 142/l.

South: S: No. 141/1, 6, 142/1.

East: S. No. 141/l,road, 142/1.

West: S. No. 141/4, 1 and road

No. 22/66/99-RD

Whereas if appears to the Government of Goa (hereinafterreferred to as "the Government") that the land specified inthe Schedule hereto (hereinafter referred to' as the "saidland") is likely to be needed for public purpose viz. for thework of re-alignment of S. H. No. I from Shantadurga HighSchool to Bicholim Bridge in Bicholim Taluka.

Now, Therefore, the Government hereby notifies, undersub-section (1') of section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894(Central Act 1 of 1894) (hereinafter referred to as the "saidAct") that the said land is likely to be needed for the purposespecified abqve.·

2. All persons interested in the said land are herebywarned not to obstruct or interfere with any surveyor or otherpersons employed upon the said land for the purpose of thesaid acquisition. Any contract for the disposal of the saidland by sale, lease, mortgage: assignment, exchange or otherwise, or any outlay commenced or improvements madethereon without the sanction of' the Collector appointedunder paragraph 4 below, ~fter the date of the publicationof this· Notification, will under clause (seventh) of section24 of the said Act, be disregarded by him while ass.essingcompensation for such parts of the said hnd as may be finallyacquired. .

3. If the Government is satisfied that the said land.is

needed for the aforesaid purpose, a declaration to that effect

under section 6 of the said Act will be published in the

Official Gazette and in two daily newspapers and public

notice thereof s~all be given in due course. If the acquisition

is abandoned wholly or in part, the fact will also be notified

in the same manner.

Survey No.1Sub-Div. No.

Names of the persons believedto be intereste<'l

2

Approx. Areain sq. mts.

3

Total: 310

SERIES II No. 51OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA 901

J6TH MARCH, 20jJO

Notification 'SCHEDULE

No. 22/52/99-RD(Description of the said land)

Total: 1900

By order an~ in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Boundaries :

North: Sy. No. 204.

South: Sy. No. 204, 20711.

East : S. No. 204.

West: Road.

204 part Q Marto Sukado Parwar. 1550Vishnu Ganesh Parwar.Shanu Pundalik Parwar.Narayan Dhakto Parwar.Apa Shiva Parwar.Anant Sadashiv Sinai Pilgaonkar.Namdev Narayan Porob.Shanu Narayan Porob Gaonkar.

T: Shanu Pundalik Parwar.Narayan Dhaktu Parwar.Apa Shiva Parwar.Vishnu Ganesh Parwar.Marto Sukado Parwar.Sarvagenik well.Shanll Gaonkar hut.

250

100

3.

Appx. areaIn sq. mts.

Village: PiligaoTaluka: Bicholim

206 pai"t Q Vasudev Shamba Shet Verlekar.T: Vaman Gangaram Pednekar.

207 part-l Q Government.T: Primary School.

2

•Survey No.1 Names of the persons believed

.Sub-Div. No. to be interested

2. All persons interested in the said land are hereby

warned not to obstruct or in'terfere with any surveyor or other

persons employed upon the said land for the purpose of the

said acquisition. 'Any contract for the disposal of the s"aid

land by sale, lease, mortgage, assignment, exchange or oth

erwise, or any outlay commenced or improvements made

thereon without the sanction of the Collector appointed

under paragraph 4 below, after the date of the publication

of this Notification, will under clause (seventh) of section

24 of the said Act, be disregared by him while assessing,., it.

compensation for such parts of the s~id land as may be finally

acquired.

Whereas it appears tothe Government of Goa (hereinafter,

referred to as "the Government") that tlieland 'specified In

the Schedule hereto (hereinafter referred to as tht:_ "said

land") is likely to be needed for public purpose viz. for

construction of road to Harijanwada in V. P. Piligao Bicholim.

Now, Therefore, the GovernmL'nl herehy notifies, under

sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894

(Central Act 1 of 1894) (ltereinafter referred to as the "said

Act") that the said land islikely to be needed for the purpose

specified above.

3. If the Government is satisfied that the said. land isneeded for the aforesaid purpose, a declaration to that effectunder section 6 of the said Act will be published in the

'OHicial Gazette and in two daily newspapers and publicnotice thereof shall be given in due course. If the acquisitionis abandoned wholly or in part, the fact will also be notifiedin the same manner.

"

4. The Government further appoints, under clause (c) of

section 3 of the said Act, the Dy. CollectorlSDO, Mapusa

'to perform the functions ()f a Collector under the said Act

in respect of the said land.

D. M. Borkar, Under Secretary (Revenue).


5. The Government also authorises under sub-section (2) of

section 4 of the said Act, the following Officers to do the Acts,

specified therein in respect of the said land.

Notification

No. 22/74/99-RD

I..The C9l1ector, N.orth Goa District, Panaji.

2. Deputy CollectorISDO,. Mapusa.

3. Executive Engineer, Div. XXIII, P.W.D., Bicholim..


Whereas it appears to the Government of Goa (hereinafterreferred to as "the Government") that the land specified inthe Schedule hereto (hereinafter referred to as the "saidland") is likely to be needed for public purpose viz. forconstruction and BIT of road from Vazem to MandleshwarTemple at Karai in V. P. Shiroda in Ponda Taluka.

6. A rough plan of the said land is available for inspection

in the Office of Deputy ColleCi.orISDO, Mapusa for a period.

of 30 days from the date of publication of this Notification

in the Official Gazette.

Now, Therefore, the Government hereby notifies, undersub-section (1) of section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894(Central Act I of 1894) (hereinafter referred to as the "saidAct") that the said land is Ii kely to be needed for the purposespecified above. .

~;

I'cf

902SERIES II No. 51


2. All persons interersted in the said land are herebywarned not to obstruct or interfere with any.surveyor or other

. persons employed upon the sa,id land for the purpose of thesaid acquisition: Any contract for the disposal of the saidland by sale, lease, mortgage, assignment, exchange orotherwise, or any outlay commenced or improvements madethereon without the sanction of the Collector appointedunder paragraph 4 below, after the date of the publicationof this Notification, will under clause (seventh) of section24 of the said Act, be disregarded by hiin while assessingcompensation for such parts ofthe said land as may be finallyacquired.

3. If the Government is satisfied that the said land isneeded for the aforesaid purpose, a declaration to that effectunder section 6 of the said Act will be published in theOfficial Gazette and in two daily newspapers an'd publicnotice thereof shall be given in due course. If the acquisitionis abandoned wholly or in part, the fact will also ,be notifiedin the same- manner.

4. The Government further appoints, under clause (c) ofsection 3 of the said Act, the Dy. c:ollector/SDO, Ponda toperform the functions of a Collector under the said Act inrespect of the said land.

5. ·The Government also authorises under sub-section (2)of section 4 of the said Act, the following Officers to do theActs, 'specified therein in respect of the said land,

I. The Collector, North Goa District, Panaji.

2 Deputy Collector/SDO, Ponda.

3. Executive Engineer, Div. XVIII (R), P.W.D., Ponda.


6. A rough plan of the said land is available for inspectionin the Office of Deputy Collector/SDO, Ponda for a periodof 30 days ti'om the date of publication of this Notificationin the Official Gazette.

2 3

29311 part H ShivaGanba Prabhudessai. 2025

287 part H Gopal Shenai Hede. ]875

T Gajanan Mortu Naik.

Tulshi Krishna Naik.

286/2 part H Gopinath Vaman Prabhu Sawkar. 355

LaximibaiNarayan Prabhu Sawkar.

Subash NarayanPrabhu SawkaI'.

Yeshwant Narayan Prabhu Sawkar.

T: Shanu Kamu Vaidya.

286/5 part H -do.,.- 255

T: Shane Gopi Vaidya.

286110 part H -do- 355

T: Rohidas Sadashiv Vaidya.

28511 part H -do- 300282/1 part H Ba1krishna Purushottam P. Gaonkar. 300

282/3 part Mand1eshwar Devasthan. 35

282/4 part Mand]eshwar Devasthan. 205

282/5 part Mand1eshwar Devasthan. 45

T: Shrikant Ramchandra Paranjape.

28011 part Comunidade of Shiroda. 365

Boundaries:

North: S.No.300,Road,S.No.287,

296/4, 7, 2., 2801l.

South; S. No. 296/6, 7, 286/1, 2,

2811l,280/1.

East: S.· No. 295/2, Nala, 2851l,

296/2,29911,298/2,292/3,

293/1.

West: S. No. 2931l ,299/l, 298/2, Nala

287/l, 286/2, 5,10, 285/l,

280/l, 3, 28214.

Total: I] 085

SCHEDULE

(Description at; the said land)

Survey No.1 Names of the persons believed Appx. areaSub-Div. No. to be interested in sq. mts.

1 2 3

29911 part H Joao Domingo Rodrigues. 1435

T: Tukoba Raghoba Naik.

298/2 'part Shantadurga Devasthan of Keu1a. 565

295/2 part H Mohan Vishwanath Shirodkar. 425

296/4 patt H Shiva Gunba Prabhudessai. 118~

T: Rama Bairu Naik.

296/5 part H: Shiva Gunba Prabhudessai. 250296n part H Narshiv Pandhati Shet Nagvekar. .485

T: RamaBairuNaik.

294/2 part H Mohan Vish,wanath Shirodkar. 625

T: Nanda Kamu Naik.


D.M. Bork,ar, Under Secretary (Reve'nue).

Panaji, 18th January,.2000.

Whereas it appears to the Government of Goa (hereinafterreferred to as "the Government") that the land specified inthe Schedule hereto (hereinafter referred to as the "saidland") is likely to be needed for public purpose viz. construction and B/T of Coddeawada to Saicowada, Tolleaband,Dandeawado road in V. P. Chinchinim Deussua, Salcete.

Now, Therefore, the Government hereby notifies, undersub-section (lrof section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894(Central Act 1 of 1894) (hereinafter referred to as the "saidAct") that the said land is likely'to be needed for the purposespecified above. .

No. 22/1 15/96-RD

Notification

Village : ShirodaTaluka : Ponda

SERIES II No. 51OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA 903

J6TH MARCH, 2000

ie Taluka Salcete Village : Chinchinim

Survey No..! Names of the persons believed App;c areaSub-Div. No. to be interested in sq. mts.

3 " I2

18/22 part 0: Arsenio Furtado. 30 Chinchinim

Maria S. Rebello. 27]/3 "., 24 " 0: Fhilipinia Vaz. (j)

Inocenio Gomes. " I" 26 " 0: Arsenio Furtado. 75 " 2 "

273/10 "Maria B. Rebello.55/29 "., 27 " Q Manuel Furtado. 30

" 30 " Q Ubelina Pereira. 100" 25 " 0: Not known 1523/8 " 0: Agostinho M. S. Laards. 100" 6 " 0 Maria S. Rebello. 35

" 10 " 0: Antonio C. V. Laards. 125

2311 I part 0:" 13 0:" 15 0:" 16 0:" 17 0:

" 18 0:" 19. 0:24/5 " 0:" 8 0:

" 10 0:25/15 0:

" 9 0:" II 0:" 12 Q" 13 0:" 18 0:

-" 20 0:

26/22 part 0" 25 " 0:

Deussua

58/11 0:" 10 0:" 9 0:" 8 0:" 5 0:

2. All persons interested in the said land are herebywarned not to obstruct or interfere w.ith any surveyor'or otherpersons employed upon the said Iand for the purpose of thesaid acquisition. Any contract for the disposal of the saidland by sale, lease, mortgage, assignment, exchange or otherwise, or any outlay commenced or improvements madethereon without the sanction of the Collector appointedunder paragraph 4 below, after thedat.e of the publicationof this Notification, will under clause (seventh) of section24 of the said Act, be disregarded by· him while assessingcompensation for such parts of the said land as may be finallyacquired.

3. If the Government is satisfied that the said land isneeded for the aforesaid purpose, a declaration to that effectunder section 6 of the said Act will. be published in theOfficial Gazette and in two daily newspapers and publicnotice thereof shall be given in due course. If the acquisition

. is abandoned wholly or in part, the fact will also be notifiedin the same manner.

4. The Government further appoints, under clause (c) ofsection 3 of the said Act, the Land Acquisition Officer, PWD(Cell), Altinho, Panaji to perform the functions of a Collectorunder the said Act in respect of the said land.

5. The Government also authorises under sub-section (2) ofsection 4 of the said Act, the following Officers to do the Acts,specified therein in respect of the said land.

I. The Collector, South Goa District, Margao.

2. Land Acquisition Officer, PWD (Cell), Altinho, Panaji.

3. ExecutiveEngineer, W. Div. VI, P.W.D., Fatorda, Margao.


6. A rough plan of the said land is available for inspectionin the Office of the Land Acquisition Officer PWD (Cell),Altinho, Panaji for a period of 30 days from the date ofpublication of this Notification in the Official Gazette.

SCHEDULE

(Descriptioil' of the said land)

26/126/3

26/426/8

2

Francisco Gonsalves.Valeriano F. X. Gonsalves.Francisco F. X. Gonsalves.Agostinho Gonsalves.Francisco GonsalvesAgostinho Gonsalves.FranGisco· X. A. Gonsalves.Julie Rebello.Rita P. Dias.Not -knownJose Antonio Ferrao.Teobaldo J. Ferrao.Saraficox Ferrao.Alvaro Ferrao.Lina Ferrao.

0: Anto.nio R Coutinho.o Antonio Furtado.

Minguel Furtado.Roque Furtado.Valagio Furtado.Cristaxao A. Furtado.

0: Joaquim M. De R Ferrao.0: Teobaldo J. Ferrao.

Seraficox Ferrao.Alvaro Ferrao.Lina Ferrao.Alexandre Ferrao.Cristo Furtado.Sebastiao R Leitao.Seraficox X. Ferrao.DomingQ Correia.Dr. Manuel Lopes.'Remedios Fernandes.Dr. Manuel Lopes.Prisonio Furtado.

Pandurang B. Raul.Maria C. I.ui,.Crizon Leit~lll.

RemiraLeilao.J. P. Furtado.Y. M. Furtado.Ruigned Furtado.C. A. Furtado.Roque C. Furtado.Valerio Furtado.

0: Joaquilll C. Leitao.

0: Max Loyala Furtado.Rosario. Leitao.

0: Corina Cotta.0: Pedro Joaquilll Leitao."0 COlllunidade of ChinchiQim.Q Locio L. Cotta.

GuilennaLeitao.Roque A. R. Leitao.Candida P. Cardozo.Benedita Leitao.Constacio Vaz.Felicidade Leitao S.

75(j)

1512575

75350200I(j)

2001]5

4540

2258

2')408

12')6

(j)

80315

215210340100975

272

225

92')6

l.'i625

904SERIES l! No. 51

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOAJ6TH MARCH, 2000

No. 22176/99-RD


D. M. Borkar, Under Secretary (Revenue).

88

150

3502075304035251010

5530

200

:;

Total: 16203

2

0: Domingos Almeida.0: Thomas P. Furtado.0: Jose Vardes.

Antonio Vardes.0: Jose E. 1: Feimindes.o Roquezino Veigas.o Luizinha Dias. .o LOUl'dina Veigas.0: Eusebio Dias.0: Ida Barreto.0: Macano E. L. Moraes.0: L,adislao Moraes.0: Aninha Loyala Furtado.

Rajendra Da L. Furtado.Minguel De Loyala furtado.Juida De L. Furtado.

0: Josin Pereira.Lourenco Pereira.Mariano Pereira.

0: Antonio A. Pinheiro."3 "

"7 "

"~ ""4 ""5 ""6 "

"4 "

4/8 "4/9 "

4/1 "

"26 "

"15 "

28/2 "

Notification

Whereas it appears to the Government of Goa (hereinafterreferred to as "the Government") that the land specified inthe Schedule hereto (hereinafter referred to as the "saidland") is likely to be needed for public purpose V1Z. forconstruction of o.0vernment Primary School Building atParwada, lJsgao in Ponda Taluka.

Now, Therefore, the Government hereby notifies, under

sub-section (I )of section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act,

1894 (Central Act I of 1894) (hereinafter referred to q's the

"said Act") th.at the said land is likely to be needed for the

purpose specified above .


2. All persons interersted In the said land are herebywarned not to obstruct or interfere with any surveyor or otherpersons employed upon the said land for the purpose ofthe said acquisition. Any contract for the disposal of the saidland by sale, lease, mortgage, assignment, exchange or otherwise, or any outlay commenced or improvements madethereon without the sanction of the Collector appointedunder paragraph 4 below, after the date of the publicationof this Notification, will under clause (seventh) of section'24 of the said Act, be disregarded by him while assessingcompensation fQr such parts of the said land as !Ray be finally

. acquired. . '\

. .417/22 "

j)

ill2575

120400260200125ill75

4159)

3001259)

751001509)

255509)

175425

20175305

175140425

100500

10050704052

1025

1150

0: Rosalin Cardozo.0: Sancia Cardozo.0: Alberto Cotta.T: Santimano Leitao.0: Alberto Cotta;

Estefana Dias E. Pereira.Inacio Pereira.

0: Mathous Viegas.0: Seby Pereira.

Milagrina Pereira.0: Inasi J. Viegas.0: Ubaldino Viegas. <

0: Comunidade of Deussua.0: Ubaldino Viegas.0: Agelista Viegas.0: Dr. Alvaro Loyala Furtado.

Rajendra Furtado.Loyala Furtado.Rahul Furtado.Did L. Furmdo.Camil Leitao.Baptista Moraes.Mary Barretto.

0: Sabestino X. Veigas.0: Comunidade of Chinchinim.0: Ubaldina Pereira.0: Antonio P. Laarda.0: Sabestiao Rebello.0: Sabestiao Rebello.0: Sapercia Lam'de.0: Francisco X. L. B. Pereira.0: Inacio Joao Furtado.

Maria S. Rebello.Arsencio Furtado.

0: Antonio C. Furtado.0: Arsencio Furtado.o Caitano Maticus.0: Eliza Menezes.

Vincy Dias.0: Francisco D. ~Imeida.

0: Alvaro Loyala Furtado.0: Joaquim C. Rehello.0: Joaquim C. Rebello.0: Joaquim C. Rebello.o Conceicao T. Rebello.

. 0 Sabestiao Rebello.Pascal A. Rebello.Pascal P. Rebello.Kasari Rebello.Patricina Rebello.

o Joaquim C. Rebello.o Fabric De Igreja de Chinchinim.0: Aninha Loyala Furtado.o Caitano Fernandes.0: Jose E. James Fernandes.0: Ignes Cota P. H. C. Rebello.0: Comunidade of Chinchinim.OCumilda P.·Colac().o Alvaro Loyab Furtado.

" 6 "" 7 "

53/8 "

"10 .."11 .."37 ..

"9 "

"·5 ."

" 6 ""17 "

n 3 "

" 3 .,.

"16 ""15 ""21 "

4/12 ..

"13 "III "1/3 "1/2 "

2/6 "

"14 .."22 "

20/8 "

" 7 "

59/2 "" 8 "

"} "

"3 ""') .."7 ..

57/4 "57n "

57/3 "

18/19 "

53/1 "274/6 "21/4 "

54/1 part54/5 "57/5 "

Chinchinim

SERIES II No. .51OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA 905

16TH MARCH, 2000

3. If the Government is satisfied that the said land is

needed for the aforesaid purpose, a declaration to that effect

under section 6 of the said Act will be published in the

'Official Gazette and in two daily newspapers and public

notice thereof shall be given in due course-.If the acquisition

is abandoned wholly or in part, the fact will also be'notified

in the same manner.

4. The Government furth,erappoints, under clause (c) of

section 3 of the said A:ct: the Deputy Collector (Rev),

Collectorate of North Goa Panaji to perform the functions of

a Collector under the said Act in respect of the said land.

5. The Gov'hntnent also authorises under sub-section (2) of

section 4 of the said Act, the following Officers to do the Acts,

specified therein in respect of the said land.

I. The Colle~tor, North Goa District, Panaji.

2. Dy. Collector, (Rev), Collectorate of North Go~ District,

Panaji.

3. Asstt.DirectorofEducation,EducationDepartInent,Panaji.


6. A rough plan of the said land is available for inspection

in the Office of the Deputy Collector (Rev), Collectorate of

North Goa, Panaji for a period of 30 days from the date of

publication of this Notification in the Official Gazette.

SCHEDULE

(Description of the said land)

Notification

No. 22/32/99-RD

Whereas by Government Notification No. 22/32/99/-RD

dated 24/9/99 published on page - of Series II, No. 28 of the

Official Gazette dated 7-10-99 and in two newspapers (I)

Sunaparant dated 4-10-99 (2) Tarun Bharat dated 5-10-99. it

was notified under section 4 of the ,Land Acquisition Act.

1894 (hereinafter referred to as the "said Act") that the land

specified in the schedule appended to the said notification

(hereinafter referred to as the "said land") was needed for

public purpose viz for construction of road at Nerul, Bardez.

And whereas in the opinion of the appropriate Govern

ment (hereinafter referred to as the "Government") the said

land is not Tequired for the aforesaid purpose.

Now, therefore, the Government is' pleased to declare

under sub-section (l) of section 48 of the said Act that it

has withdrawn from acquisition of the said land for the

aforesaid public purpose and that the aforesaid Government

notification shall be deemed to be cancelled so far as it relates

to the said land. Th~ persons interested in the said land,

may lodge to the Deputy Collector/SDO, Mapusa, within a

period of thirty days from the date of this notification claims

under sub-section ,(2) of section 48 of the said Act, for the

damages suffered by them in consequence of the notice or

of any proceedings thereunder and for costs reasonably

incurred by them in prosecution of the proceedings under

the said Act relating to the said land.

Taluka : Ponda

Survey No.1Sub-Div. No.

Names of the personsbelieved to be interested

2

Village : Usgao

Approx areain sq .. m.

3

A pian of the land shall be available for inspection in the

office of the Deputy Collector/SDO, Mapusa for a period of

thirty days from the date of this notification.

283/4 part Shri Jagadis!l Chandra Mahadev. ' !

Sinai Khandeparkar.

Camil Fefnandes.

Boundaries

North: S. No. 283/1.

South: S, No. 283/4.

East: S. No.283/5.

West: Road.

Total

2250

2250


D, M. Borkar, Under Secretary (Revenue).

Panaji, 6th March, 2000,

--+++--

Department of .Sports & Youth Affairs

Order


D. M. B'orkar, Under Secretary (Revenue).

Panaji, 31st January, 2000:"

No. 8/39i87/Sports (Part file)/3665

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for the

re-.eonstitution of the General Body and Governing Council

of the Sports Authorit:1 of Goa comprising of the following

members:-

906SERIES II No. 51

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA/6TH MARCH, 2000

GENERAL BODY OF THE SPORTS AUTHORITY OF GOA

l. The Hon'ble Chief Minister

of Goa. President Ex-officio

2. The Hon'ble Minist~r for Sports

& Youth Affairs. Vice ~ President

Ex-officio

3. Shri Ramkrishna Dhavlikar,

M.L.A. Member

4. Shri Vinay Tendulkar, M:L.A. Member.

5. Secretary (Finance) Ex-officio Member.

6. Secretary (Sports) Ex-officio Member.

7. Director of Education. Ex-officio Member.

8. Chief Engineer, PWD. Ex-officio Member.

9. Director of Accounts Ex-officio Member.

10. Director of Sports &

Youth Affairs Ex-officio Member.

Il. Executive Director,

Sports Authority of Goa. Member.

12. Chairman, Goa Board of

Secondary and Higher

Secondary Education. Member.

e) Goa Badminton Association

f) Goa Cricket Association.

g) Goa Chess Association.

h) Goa Footbal Association

g) Goa Swimming Association.

i) Goa Handball Association.

j) Goa Judo Association.

k) Goa Kabaddi Association.

I) Goa Kho-Kho Association.

m) Goa Taekwando Association.

n) Goa Table Tennis Association.

0) Goa Voll~yball Association.

p) Goa Wrestling Association.

q) Goa Yatching Association.

r) Goa Sports Medicine Association.

s) President/Principals' Forum of Higher

Secondary Schools.

t) President Goa Headmasters'

Association.

u) Registrar/Director of Sports, Goa

University.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

13. Seniormost Officer/Coach of

Sports Authority of India (SAl)

in Goa

14. President/SecretarY,

Goa Olympic Association.

Member.

Member.

20. Managing Director, IndustrialDevelopment Corporation. Special Invitee' Member.

21. Secretary - SAG. (To be brought ondeputation from the. Directorate ofSports & Youth Affairs) Member Secretary.

Governing Council of the Sports Authority of Goa

1. Hon'ble Minister for Sports & Youth Affairs& Vice President, SAG (Ex. Officio) Chairman.

8. Presidents/Secretaries of 6 (Six) Sports Associations.

a) Goa Fotball Association Member.

b) Goa Amateur Athletic Association Member.

c) Goa Cri~ket Asso'ciati~m Member.

d) Goa Table Tennis Association Member.

e) Goa Volleyball Association Member.

f) Goa Swimming Association Member.

2. Shri Ramkrishna Dhavlikar, M.L:A.

Member.

Member.

Ex-officio Member.

Member.

Ex-officio Member.

Ex-officio Member.

7. Executive Director, SAG

6. Director of Sports & YouthAffairs.

4. Secretary (Finance)

3. Shri Vinay Tendulkar, M.L.A.

5. Secretary (Sports)

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.

Member.·

a) Goa Amateur Athletic Association

b) Goa Basketball Association.

c) Goa Body Building Association.

d) Goa Boxing Association.

19. Presidents! Secretaries of 22

(Twenty Two) Sports Associations.

16. President, Sports Journalists

Association of Goa.

17. OutstandingSportswoman

Smt. Angela Naik de Abreu.

18. OutstandingSportsman

Shri Camilo Gonsalves.

15. 8 (Eight) ExportslPromoters in the

field of Sports.

Shri Agnelo Alcacoas

Shri Noel de Lima Leitao

Shri Alberto Colaco

Shri Shivanand Salgaonkar

Shri Philip Valla~ates

Shri Santosh Ghat,wal.

Shri Brahamanand Sancoalcar

Shri Nandan Kudchadkar

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

9. Two Experts/Promoters in the field of Sports.

907

16TH MARCH, 2000

Noti.f i cation

12. Managing Director, IndustrialDevelopment Corporation Special Invitee Member.

I) Shri Alberto Colaco.

2) Shri Nandan Kudchadkar

10. One Outstanding SportspersonShri Camilo Gonsalves .

II. Treasurer (To be elected in the firstmeeting of the General Body).

Member.

Member.

Member.

Memqer.

No. 5/9/90-TPT1217

In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (xii) of Subrule (1) of Rule 22 of the Goa, Daman & Diu Motor VehiclesTax Rules 1974, the Government of Goa hereby exemptsMotor Vehicle i.e. Mobile Science Exhibition Bus, Tata make,bearing Chasis No. 344068360389 and engine No. 692 D23372277 and bearing registration No. GA-01/T-4412. ownedby Goa Science Centre, Marine Highway Miramar. Panaji frompayment' of Tax due to this State, being used as MobileScience Exhibition Bus solely for educational purpose.

!~

13. Secretary, SAG (To be Qroughton deputation from the Directorateof Sports & Youth Affairs) Member Secretary,

The President of the General Body and the Chairman of theGoverning Council may co-opt or invite any additional membersfrom time to time, not exceeding five at a time, to attend anyof the meetings of the Authority depending on the Agendaof the meeting,

The tenure of both the Committees will be for a period ofthree years from the date of the issue of the order. The officialmembers will be entitled to claim TAIDA for attending the meetingas Grade I Officers as and when they attend the meeting.


Dr. Susana de Sousa, Director of Sports & YouthAffairs/It. Secretary (Ex-officio).

Panaji. 4th February, 2000.

---...---

Department of Transport

Director"!-te of Transport

Notification

No. 5/9/90-Tpt (part)/84

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (xii) of sub-. rule (1) of Rule 22 of the Goa, Daman and l?iu Motor Vehicles

Tax Rules, 1974, the Government of Goa hereby exemptsmotor vehicle bearing No. GA-0I/R-387 owned by International Animal Rescue, Sangolda, Bardez, Goa from paymentof tax due to this State. being used for a charitable purpose.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.\.

A. T. Kamat, Director of Transport & Ex-Officio JointSecretary.



A. T. Kamat, Director of Transport & Ex-Officio JointSecretary.

Panaji, 3rd February, 2000.

Notification

No. 5/9/90-TPT (P.F. )1296

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (XII) ofSub Rule (1) of Rule 22 of the Goa, Daman & Diu MotorVehicle Tax Rules, 1974 . the Government of Goa hcrebyexempts Two Wheeler Bajaj Vehicle bearing RegistrationNo. GA-02-L-1949 and registered at the office ofAsst. Director of Transport, Vasco, owned by the NationalCentre for Antarctic and Oce~ln Research DevelopmentVasco from payment of road Ta\ dll": ttl this State, the vehiclebeing used for National Develtll'lll<.'nt and Ocean research.

By order and in the namc or the Governor of Goa.

A. T. Kamat. Director of Transport & Ex-Officio JointSecretary.

Panaji, 17th February~ 2000.

Government Printing Press

Notice

The subscribers to the Official Gazette are kindly reminded

that their present subscription term ends on the 31st March.

2000, being the end of financial year.

In case they wi~h to continue to be subscribers for the ensuing

financial year of 2000·2001 they have to renew their subscrip

tions from 1st April, 2000.

Subscriptions also can be opened for half year i.e. from 1st

April, 1st July or 1st October or for any quarter, beginning

on 1st April, 1st July, 1st October or 1st January.

908SERIES II No. 51


SUBSCRIPTION RATES

The r~vised subscription rates, with effect from 1-1-2000 are

as follows:

Rs. P. Rs. P. Rs. P.

Renewal .of subscription from 1st April should be effected on

or before 31st March, 2000 in order to avoid· interruption in the

despatch of copies of the Gazette. It should be noted that, in

case the subscription is .not opened/renewed before the

commencement of the period to which it r:efers, the subSl;ribers

will be entitled to receive copies .of the Gazette only from the

date the subscription is actually opened/renewed.

(Within the Union ()f India)

All 3 . SeriesSeries

SeriesII

S edesIII

Rs. P.

The postal charges indicated above are provisional and maybe changed at any time during the subscription period.

The subscription charges are' accepted either in cash, postal

order or demand draft only on State Bank of India, Panaji, in

favour of the Director, Printing and Stationery, Panaji-Goa.

Remittances by cheques or any other form of payment will not

be accepted.

The payment of sUbscription~ will also be accepted at the

Margao Branch of this Office situated in the Comunidade

Building at Margao.

For any quarter .(Postage) .: .

For half year .•......, .(Postage) .

For any period exceeding6 months. upto one year ..

(Postage) .

220.0020.00

300.0040.00

480.0080.00

120.0010.00

150.0020.00

240.0040.00

100.0010.00

120.0020.00

200,0040.00

120.0010.00

150.0020.00

240.0'040.00

GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS.PANAJI - GOA.

PRICE - Rs. 12.00

series ii no. official~twgazettegoaprintingpress.gov.in/downloads/1900/9900/9900-51-sii... ·...

Documents