serrano vs gallant

47
Republic of the Philippines Supreme Court Manila EN BANC ANTONIO M. SERRANO, G.R. No. 167614 Petitioner, Present: PUNO, C.J., QUISUMBING, YNARES-SANTIAGO, CARPIO, AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, - versus - CORONA, CARPIO MORALES, TINGA, CHICO-NAZARIO, VELASCO, Jr., NACHURA, LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, BRION, and GALLANT MARITIME SERVICES, PERALTA, JJ. INC. and MARLOW NAVIGATION CO., INC., Promulgated: Respondents. March 24, 2009 x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

Upload: maechmedina

Post on 18-Aug-2015

237 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

In relation to RA 8042 of the Overseas Migrant Act. In this case, it was alleged that section 10 of the said statute is unconstitutional for violating equal protection clause.

TRANSCRIPT

Republic of the PhilippinesSupreme CourtManila EN BANC ANTONIO M. SERRANO, .R. No. !"#"!$Petitioner,Present: PUNO, C.J.,QUISUMBING,YNARES-SANTIAGO,CARPIO,AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ,- versus - CORONA,CARPIO MORAES,TINGA,C!ICO-NAZARIO,"EASCO, #r.,NAC!URA,EONAR$O-$E CASTRO,BRION, andA%%ANT MARITIME SER&ICES, PERATA, JJ.INC. an' MAR%O( NA&IATIONCO., INC., Pro%u&'(te):Res*on)ents. M(r+, -., -//01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 ) E C I S I O N A*STRIA+MARTINE,, J.: 2or )e+()es, t,e toi& o3 so&it(r4 %i'r(nts ,(s ,e&*e) &i3t entire 3(%i&ies(n) +o%%unities out o3 *overt4. T,eir e(rnin's ,(ve 5ui&t ,ouses, *rovi)e),e(&t, +(re, e6ui**e) s+,oo&s (n) *&(nte) t,e see)s o3 5usinesses. T,e4 ,(ve7oven to'et,er t,e 7or&) 54 tr(ns%ittin' i)e(s (n) 8no7&e)'e 3ro% +ountr4 to+ountr4. T,e4,(ve*rovi)e)t,e)4n(%i+ ,u%(n&in85et7een+u&tures,so+ieties (n) e+ono%ies. Yet, only recently have we begun to understand notonly how much international migration impacts development, but how smartpublic policies can magnify this effect. Unite) N(tions Se+ret(r4-Gener(& B(n 9i-MoonG&o5(& 2oru% on Mi'r(tion (n) $eve&o*%entBrusse&s, #u&4 :/, -//;*etitioner?, ( 2i&i*ino se(3(rer, t,e &(st +&(use in t,e@t, *(r('r(*, o3 Se+tion :/, Re*u5&i+ A+t >R.A.? No. A/.-,:-D? *er (nnu%, *&us ,is s(&(ries 3or t,eune1*ire) *ortion o3 ,is e%*&o4%ent +ontr(+t or for three (3) months for everyyear of the unexpired term, whichever is less. 1 1 1 1 >E%*,(sis (n) un)ers+orin' su**&ie)? )oesnot %('ni34t,e+ontri5utionso3overse(s2i&i*ino7or8ers>O2Es?ton(tion(&)eve&o*%ent, 5ut e1(+er5(test,e,(r)s,i*s5orne54t,e%54un)u&4&i%itin't,eirentit&e%ent in +(se o3 i&&e'(& )is%iss(& to t,eir &u%*-su% s(&(r4 eit,er 3or t,e une1*ire)*ortion o3 t,eir e%*&o4%ent +ontr(+t or 3or t,ree %ont,s 3or ever4 4e(r o3 t,e une1*ire)ter%, 7,i+,ever is &ess >su5Be+t +&(use?. Petitioner +&(i%s t,(t t,e &(st +&(use vio&(tes t,eO2EsF +onstitution(& ri',ts in t,(t it i%*(irs t,e ter%s o3 t,eir +ontr(+t, )e*rives t,e% o3e6u(& *rote+tion (n) )enies t,e% )ue *ro+ess. B4 7(4 o3 Petition 3or Revie7 un)er Ru&e .@ o3 t,e Ru&es o3 Court, *etitioner(ss(i&s t,e $e+e%5er A, -//. $e+isionres*on)ents? un)er ( P,i&i**ine Overse(s E%*&o4%ent A)%inistr(tion >POEA?-(**rove) Contr(+t o3 E%*&o4%ent 7it, t,e 3o&&o7in' ter%s (n) +on)itions:$ur(tion o3 +ontr(+t :- %ont,sPosition C,ie3 O33i+erB(si+ %ont,&4 s(&(r4 USH:,.//.//!ours o3 7or8 .A./ ,ours *er 7ee8Overti%e USH;//.// *er %ont,"(+(tion &e(ve 7it, *(4 ;.// )(4s *er %ont,0? %ont,s (n) t7ent4-t,ree >-G? )(4s. Petitioner 3i&e) 7it, t,e (5or Ar5iter >A? ( Co%*&(int:0 )(4s? in+&. &e(ve *(4 :,I././/---------------------------------------------------------------------------------@,GA-.-GA%ount ()Buste) to +,ie3 %(teFs s(&(r4>M(r+, :0JG:, :00A to A*ri& :JG/, :00A? K :,/I/.@/USH.@.//?,