sesame tree, ‘glocalisation’ and reconciliation: northern ireland according to sesame street,...
DESCRIPTION
An examination of the very first Northern Irish member of the Sesame Street global ‘family’ of Sesame Workshop television programmes, providing an insight into the programme-making processes from a global and local perspective, including some accounts and reviews from the lead editor of the Sesame Tree series, the author of this paper. This document provides an overview of the commercial pressures children’s television programmes and programme-makers face, and examines the fine balances between didacticism, cultural imperialism and protectionism in providing children’s media messages, in particular, within the Sesame Workshop international co-productions. It also provides a discourse of Glocalisation as both a globalising (proliferating) and pedagogical strategy. It also provides a socio- historical context to the Sesame Workshop’s interventionist stance of moral didacticism and multiculturalism, which has given rise to co-productions that are geared towards conflict resolution and reconciliation in conflict and post-conflict countries or failed states. Some events in American civil rights, and Northern Irish history, sectarianism and racism, are given as a backdrop; socio-historical factors that have been key to why the Sesame Tree series came about.TRANSCRIPT
Sesame Tree, ‘Glocalisation’ and Reconciliation:
Northern Ireland according to Sesame Street, and
Children’s Television in Commercial Hegemony
Wai-Lun Tsang
Module Code: MED815
Student ID: xxxxxxxxxxx
This document has been censored: Some details and/or allegedly confidential information have been omitted. This is a Masters level thesis, which attained a distinction grade. If you need to cite any part of it, it is advisable to seek the original, unmolested document, which should be freely available to students and researchers from the University of Ulster library on request.
Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Arts, School of Media, Film and Journalism,
the University of Ulster at Coleraine, in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree
of Master of Arts, Film and Television Management and Policy, 2009
i
Declaration
I hereby declare that with effect from the date on which the dissertation is
deposited in the Library of the University of Ulster I permit the Librarian of the
University to allow the dissertation to be copied in whole or in part without
reference to me on the understanding that such authority applies to the provision of
single copies made for study purposes or for inclusion within the stock of another
library. This restriction does not apply to the copying or publication of the title and
abstract of the dissertation. IT IS A CONDITION OF USE OF THIS DISSERTATION THAT
ANYONE WHO CONSULTS IT MUST RECOGNISE THAT THE COPYRIGHT RESTS WITH
THE AUTHOR AND THAT NO QUOTATION FROM THE DlSSERTATION AND NO
INFORMATION DERIVED FROM IT MAY BE PUBLISHED UNLESS THE SOURCE IS
PROPERLY ACKNOWLEDGED.
Wai-Lun Tsang
Wednesday, 16 September 2009
ii
Contents
Acknowledgements ................................................................................................iii
Abstract.................................................................................................................. iv
Preface ....................................................................................................................v
1. Introduction: the BBC, Sesame Tree and Kids’ TV in a Commercial Hegemony..... 1
2. Background: Imperialism and the Socio-Historical Conditions that Grew the
Sesame Tree ......................................................................................................... 14
3. The ‘Glocal’ Processes of the Sesame Tree Project ............................................ 27
4. Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 40
Appendix.............................................................................................................. 43
References............................................................................................................ 45
iii
Acknowledgements
My thanks go to my family and friends, advisors and peers, colleagues and
contributors, all the people at the Sesame Workshop, the University of Ulster,
Sixteen South and Inferno Productions, including the following to name just a few:
Dr. Cahal McLaughlin, Prof. Máire Messenger Davies, Ronan McCloskey, Eamonn
Murphy, Laura Mailey, Vicky Bevis, Ian McDonald, Candida Julian Jones, Ian Nugent,
Colin Williams, Nilesh Panse, Dez McCarthy, Judy Wilson, Colin Devenny, Michael
Beattie, Greg Higgins, Simon Edwards, Ripley, Stephanie Needham, Mark Casey,
Alan Jones, and Janet Allen.
iv
Abstract
An examination of the very first Northern Irish member of the Sesame Street global
‘family’ of Sesame Workshop television programmes, providing an insight into the
programme-making processes from a global and local perspective, including some
accounts and reviews from the lead editor of the Sesame Tree series, the author of
this paper. This document provides an overview of the commercial pressures
children’s television programmes and programme-makers face, and examines the
fine balances between didacticism, cultural imperialism and protectionism in
providing children’s media messages, in particular, within the Sesame Workshop
international co-productions. It also provides a discourse of Glocalisation as both a
globalising (proliferating) and pedagogical strategy. It also provides a socio-
historical context to the Sesame Workshop’s interventionist stance of moral
didacticism and multiculturalism, which has given rise to co-productions that are
geared towards conflict resolution and reconciliation in conflict and post-conflict
countries or failed states. Some events in American civil rights, and Northern Irish
history, sectarianism and racism, are given as a backdrop; socio-historical factors
that have been key to why the Sesame Tree series came about.
Keywords:
Sesame Street, Northern Ireland, Sesame Tree, Sesame Workshop, CTW, BBC,
children’s television, Globalisation, Globalization, Transnationalism, Glocalisation,
Glocalization, Multiculturalism, Ethnocentrism, British, Irish, American, cultural
imperialism, The Troubles, conflict, peace, reconciliation, civil rights, sectarianism,
racism, moral didacticism, interventionism, pedagogy, education, intellectual
property, commodification, commercial hegemony, homogeneity, neoliberalism,
Rechov Sumsum, Shara’a Simsim, Israel, Palestine
v
Preface
Like “death and taxes”1, one of those immutable certainties in life seems to be the
gaping chasm forming between academia and practice when engaging in any
discursive endeavour. But as both a Media scholar and media professional – an
editor by trade with experience in virtually all areas of preproduction, production
and postproduction – I hope I can narrow that gap a little, towards a relevant and
conscientious praxis. For the simple reasons of common sense and common
courtesy, there are certain details I must omit, work colleagues I should not
unwittingly perturb, and maybe even some litigious entities from which I must
protect others and myself. In a small way, this illustrates that there is no respite
from commercial pressure, even in academia.
The pervasiveness of commercial influences upon creativity is a well-trodden
subject, and one that often infers some sinister control and lasso over creative
freedom. Suspicion befalls the commercial world, or the world of market forces:
‘market’ is articulated with ‘force’, as if choices are manipulated and imposed upon
us by something invisible. Thus, it is easy to gravitate towards theories of
conspiracy, but I am both wary and sceptical of such ideas. The first concern of this
dissertation is not how a television production is forced to go one way or another,
but how it flows. Perhaps commercial hegemony is not defined by market forces,
but by market flow. In short, I am interested in the organisation of informal and
formal structures in the collaborative process of television development, and how
that affects creative goals. I am also interested in how such commercial structures
and hegemony proliferate and sustain themselves. Chapter one describes the
context of television as a business, examining its operation as a creative industry in
a global context, and proffers a foundation to understanding television programme
1 In a letter to Jean-Baptiste Leroy on 13 November 1789, Benjamin Franklin wrote, “… in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.”
vi
making and development, with a specific comparison of the Sesame Workshop and
BBC cultural histories.
Investigating the affects of commercialism in children’s television stirs up
some ideological questions that often perturb parents and guardians. Nevertheless,
this is the world we are born into, and one we must learn to live in. To borrow from
Carmen Luke, “[c]ommodification and consumerism are... the root logics of
everyday life at work, at home, and at play in any capitalist order” (1994, p. 313). In
short, the world of adults has an entrance fee. The market flows, diverts and
spreads, but the proliferation of capitalist ideology is not the be all and end all. It is
more often than not a means to carry other messages on top of messages. The
messages are pleural and polysemic. To cite David Buckingham writing in the
journal, Children's Geographies, “economic domination does not necessarily
translate directly into ideological or cultural domination” (2007, p. 47). Having said
that, conversely, one might also argue that although commercial hegemony can be
a conduit for and carrier of many other ideas, one could argue that its proliferation
follows a pattern more akin to a parasite, than a symbiote.
The discursive arguments that naturally follow are examined in chapter two,
providing a detailed socio-historical background to the Sesame Workshop’s
programme adaptations, their political influences, motivations and global ambitions.
It explores how a spinoff from an American non-profit franchise managed to finally
infiltrate a previously resistant British Broadcasting Corporation and public service
broadcaster. Contextualised and briefly touched upon in chapter one, to “the
astonishment of the Industry”, the original Sesame Street series was turned down by
the BBC’s Monica Sims, who found the use of filmmaking techniques common in
advertising, “offensive” (Inglis, 2003, p. 79). Chapter two explores Sesame Tree as a
paradigm of the Sesame Workshop’s ability to create spinoffs to specifically target
what they see as issues particular to a nation or country, and also how it can
proliferate its brand via ‘glocalisation’. Glocalisation, in terms of television, simply
means the processes involved in the local adaption(s) of global media messages
(Buckingham, 2007, p. 50). Some key events in American and Northern Irish civil
vii
rights histories, which seem to have mirrored each other in many vital aspects, are
given as a possible reason for the Sesame Workshop’s interventionist stance in
recent years, which has lead to more questions of American, and cultural
imperialism. Nevertheless, without this stance it is unlikely that the Sesame Tree
series would have come about. Some of the Sesame Workshops international co-
productions, such as those in Kosovo, Israel and Palestine, which are geared
towards conflict resolution, reconciliation, and mutual respect, bear strategic
resemblances to Sesame Tree, Northern Ireland.
Focusing mainly on multiculturalism in terms of sectarianism, racism and
methods of promoting tolerance, chapter three provides a review of Sesame Tree in
terms of both content and practice. Each episode has specific educational goals as
set out by the Sesame Workshop, in consultation with the Northern Ireland
curriculum. Chapter three examines a few of the episodes that are more pointedly
directed towards difference and mutual respect. As the lead editor of the series, I
hope to provide some insight into the reasons and decision-making behind some
story examples.
In closing, although examples of media messages geared toward children
will be explored, ultimately I doubt there will be any final conclusions about what
messages are best for children. To state the obvious, opinions differ infinitum. I
think it prudent to leave that debate up to the reader.
1
1. Introduction: the BBC, Sesame Tree and Kids’ TV
in a Commercial Hegemony
Understanding the way in which television is operated, financed, and controlled as a business
is essential to understanding the medium and its messages.
(Leibert & Sprafkin, 1988, p. 21)
When Robert Leibert and Joyce Sprafkin posited a key to understanding television in
The Early Window: Effects of Television on Children and Youth, their statement
tacitly acknowledged that, regardless of genre or target audience (TV intended for
adult or junior consumption), television is fundamentally a business. Ergo, as a
subset, children’s television, together with its educational content, falls within the
domain of business. This chapter proffers a brief outline of children’s television in a
global context. It explores the business of selling education, the tensions between
commercial and public service broadcasting, government policy and intellectual
property as a commodity. I think it is important to provide a brief overview of the
broadcasting climate in the United Kingdom, in particular with respect to the BBC
and its role as Britain’s public service broadcaster, and its operation within a global,
commercial hegemony. After which, the ambivalent and difficult schism in the BBC’s
desire to compete, and its desire to be independent from the influences of the
competitive, commercial broadcasting ecology can be explored. The Sesame
Workshop finally found its way to BBC National (onto BBC2 and CBBC – ‘CBeebees’),
after xxxxxx BBCNI (Northern Ireland regional) as a xxxxxxxxxxx in 2008, with
Northern Ireland’s Sesame Tree series. Sesame Street did make it to a United
Kingdom audience in the Seventies via commercial broadcaster ITV and later
Channel 4, but only after rejection by the BBC (Inglis, 2003, p. 78). The latter half of
this chapter explores the context of the rejection, and deals with the issues of
cultural barriers and biases tied up in issues of pedagogy, commerce and
globalisation.
2
In the world of commerce, education can be treated as a commodity for
trade; ‘commodified’ (Rushkoff, 2004)2 like any other intellectual property. Such
controlling parameters demand the collective acquiescence of public and private
corporations, programme-makers, managers and individual talent. They also require
legislation by the state or government: Rules must be adhered to and enforced for
the system to function. Intellectual property (IP), something that can be copied and
disseminated with great ease in the digital age, must artificially be made scarce and
protected by laws (Czerniawska & Potter, 1998, p. 7). In what has been dubbed, the
Creative Industries (DCMS, 2009, p. 4), IP is simply, yet another tradable commodity.
This alludes to a hypothesis that the structures that corral and control all creativity
in television are inescapably market driven. This includes television and indeed all
media, aimed towards children, plus their associated media messages.
The massive scale of that global, children’s media market can scarcely be
better exemplified than by the market values of the big four, “global broadcasting
powerhouses” (Havens, 2007), all of whom are American majority stake
conglomerates, namely the Cartoon Network, Nickelodeon, Fox Kids, and Disney.3
The Walt Disney Company has a current market capitalisation of 48.7 billion US
Dollars (Bloomberg, 2009), just two years after the start of the credit crisis (Authers,
2009)4. In November 2007, before the recession took a major toll, Disney had a
Market cap of 65 billion USD. A staggering “forty-six of the approximately 100
thematic television channels aimed at children were owned by one of these four
channel operators” (Havens, 2007). It is easy to see how America’s global economic
dominance is viewed with concern. That is not to say that this economic dominance
is not also a concern in the US domestically. The FCC (Federal Communications
2 ‘Commodification’ refers “to the way that market values can replace other social values, or the way a market can replace a communal system”, whereas ‘commoditization’ may refer specifically to “the way that goods that used to be distinguishable in terms of attributes end up becoming mere commodities in the eyes of the market or consumers” 3 Cartoon Network, Nickelodeon, and Fox Kids respectively belong to Turner Broadcasting, Viacom, and Fox Television Entertainment. 4 According to “Adam Applegarth, then Chief executive of the stricken UK bank Northern Rock… August 9 marked the beginning of the credit crunch when BNP Paribas froze access to a large money market fund” (Authers, 2009).
3
Commission) acts as a watchdog and safeguard against solely market-driven output,
a role akin to Ofcom in the UK. Children’s television is defined by the FCC as
“programming that furthers the positive development of children 16 years of age
and under in any respect, including the child's intellectual/cognitive or
social/emotional needs” (FCC, 2008). The FCC serves to enforce ‘The Children's
Television Act’, enacted by Congress on October 18, 1990. One of the major goals
of the Act was to increase the quantity of educational and informational broadcast
television programming for children. The FCC “makes no distinction between
general audience/entertainment programs that serve children's educational and
informational needs and programs that are specifically designed to educate and
inform children”. Echoing a concern that “conglomerates exist simply to make
money by selling light escapist entertainment” (McChesney, 2002, p. 27), congress
determined that “market forces alone had not produced an adequate amount of
children's educational and informational programming on commercial television”
(FCC, 2008).
In the pursuit of higher profit margins, children’s media producers have
tended towards homogeneity, promoting a particular brand of family values,
claiming universality: Asserting “one’s programming taps into universal themes is
first and foremost a business strategy, not a cultural analysis” (Havens, 2007). To
cite David Buckingham, “as they increasingly engage with world markets, Disney
and other cultural producers are having to suppress elements that might be
perceived to be too culturally specific in favour of those that seem to speak to some
universal, trans-cultural notion of childhood” (2007, p. 48). As a consequence live
actors are replaced with puppets and animated characters to “overcome racial and
ethnic differences among exporting and importing cultures” (Havens, 2007).
Fantasy characters can be racially indeterminate, be easily redubbed, repackaged
and marketed to other territories. Non-human characters can speak with any
language, any accent and hail from any region, country, planet or fantastic realm.
Nevertheless it is precisely this tendency towards fantasy characters and
anthropomorphic personalities that the Sesame Workshop uses, only the Muppets’
4
primary role is to educate, not solely to entertain and merchandise – although it
does all three very well. Though Jim Henson would later claim he simply liked the
sound of the name, the general consensus is that Muppets came from a
combination of the words, ‘puppet’ and ‘marionette’ (Finch, 1993, p. 18), which
helped galvanise their anthropomorphosis, providing them with a distinct identity,
even race. I recall a casual conversation with xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
whilst editing an episode some time in 2008, when xxxxxx advised never to call the
characters puppets: The Sesame people really don’t like that. This is a key
distinction. Muppets are not just puppets; they aspire to be real in the sense that
they want to engage with the real world, live and interact with real children and
adults. A Muppet may even one day be able to die. South Africa’s Takalani Sesame
(2000) engaged with the difficult subject of HIV and AIDS in 2002, with Kami, a
Muppet who is HIV positive (Sesame Workshop, 2007, pp. 3, 33). With Kami, the
Sesame Workshop identified a specific social issue and tackled it in a commendably
inventive way. Kami is not simply a fantasy character; she is a character with a
potentially fatal disease, and what is more, she is African, but she is neither black,
nor white (Goldstein Knowlton & Hawkins, 2006). The Sesame Workshop adopted
commercial techniques of for an educational agenda.
Television’s commercialism has been an ongoing global concern, and
despite the BBC’s Public Service remit, it has received the same criticism as its
commercial counterparts. In a recent report from the Centre for Policy Studies,
Martin Le Jeune lambasts the BBC as a “me-too broadcaster with a serial record of
imitation” (2009, p. 26), citing reality TV, phone vote formats from Channel 4 and
ITV, and twenty-four hour news from Sky News as examples. However, Jason Deans,
writing for the Guardian, plainly ascribes the Centre for Policy Studies as a
“rightwing thinktank [sic]” (2009), suggesting that Le Jeune’s erstwhile role as BSkyB
head of public affairs may be skewing his views towards a less than dispassionate
polemic. Deans points out that the argument is an old one, citing an unnamed BBC
spokesperson who asserts, “the most recent research shows that the public want
more, not less from the BBC, and in particular hugely value our wide range of
5
popular programming which Le Jeune would like to see given away to commercial
operators” (ibid.). Despite the riposte from the anonymous BBC representative, the
statement does not refute or even repudiate Le Jeune’s main thrust that the BBC is
using funds from the license fee to rehash commercial formats; using public money
to compete with the private sector. In the September 2001 edition of The Modern
Law Review, the BBC was praised for its “standard-setting role”, all but exonerating
it from European Community constraints and normal fair-trading practices due to its
“enormous importance for the media ecology not only culturally but economically”
(Born & Prosser, 2001, p. 687). Eight years on (at the time of this writing), scholars,
professionals and commentators have been revisiting the license fee debate as the
BBC diversifies onto other digital media in a tentative economic climate. The ‘old
arguments’ of unfair competition and commercialism versus public service have
been transposed to the BBC’s online developments:
The BBC has been given a general licence to experiment with and to deliver online services,
which are now among the most widely used Internet services. This raises the question of
whether they are acting within their public service remit, whose legal definition is based on
broadcasting under analogue conditions. (Ahlert & Ariño, 2004, p. 405)
Those sentiments were echoed by News Corp CEO, James Murdoch at the Marketing
Society’s AGM in London on 24 April 2008. Criticizing the BBC’s iPlayer, Murdoch
said, “I'm not saying it is a bad product, but I am saying it does crowd out
competition and innovation”. The BBC Trust, the BBC’s independent oversight body
promptly responded the following day stating that the “BBC Trust subjected the BBC
iPlayer to a rigorous Public Value Test that included a Market Impact Assessment
carried out by Ofcom” (Williams, 2008). Murdoch’s perspective is understandable, if
not slightly hypocritical given his father’s legacy. Commercial pressure is something
that the BBC can opt to forego. Ofcom has regularly assessed the BBC’s commercial
impact. A recent report examining the BBC’s latest attempt to future proof and
follow the wave of digital convergence by moving into ‘Local Video Services’; a
technology that, for example, can provide very localised and up-to-date news, and
6
possibly citizen journalism (reports submitted by the public) over the Internet
(mobile or fixed). Ofcom concludes that the BBC will have a significant commercial
impact, further stating that the “introduction of the BBC service could also increase
the risk of investment projects – particularly in early years, before the full impact of
the service is known” (Ofcom, 2008, p. 209). In other words, the nascent quality of
the technology makes it even more high risk, further deterring commercial
investment. It is not difficult to imagine that entrepreneurial spirit would fade when
faced with a well-funded giant like the BBC. And yet, switching back to the BBC’s
side, one could argue that its moves onto the Internet are and have been simply
provide more accessibility. Part of the organisation’s charter is to build public value,
moving toward “a future where the public have access to a treasure-house of digital
content, a store of value which spans media and platforms, develops and grows
over time, which the public own and can freely use in perpetuity” (BBC, 2004, p. 5)
The license fee and Public Service Broadcasting debate ends here however,
as one of the principal discourses of this dissertation is not to single out the BBC or
contribute to the already gargantuan pile of papers on the matter. The question of
why the BBC is compelled to compete with commercial television is somewhat
rhetorical; echoing the opening hypothesis: The structures that corral and control
all creativity in television, and also its moves into digital convergence (and new
market territory, and potential), are inescapably market driven. The BBC seems
compelled to compete, alluding to a second aspect of the hypothesis. For good or
bad, there persists a commercial culture that is so pervasive and so normalised it is,
for all intents and purposes, an invisible and inescapable hegemony – one that is
reinforced consciously and unconsciously by an aforementioned collective
acquiescence. Despite being comparatively immune to the vicissitudes of
commercial broadcasting on an economic level locally (i.e. with respect to the other
UK terrestrial broadcasters), it seems that the BBC is compelled to compete because
it is immersed in a culture of commercial competition. CBBC commissioners are
asking, “[c]an you invent a global bestseller which is not creatively compromised?”
(BBC, 2009) Subsequently, children’s television programme makers, from producers
7
and managers to developers and writers, are seeking merchandisable, saleable
products to fit the commercial aspirations of commissioners. There is a top-down
instruction to make globally competitive children’s television, passed from
commissioner to producer, producer to developer, developer to writer, and fed back
and forth to ensure that that instruction is near gospel.
Competition was not always a concern for the BBC. In 1947, children’s
television was “a small, kindly offering from a relatively minor medium” (Inglis,
2003, p. 17), with a modest budget and equally modest aims. 1947 was only two
years after the war, and radio was the dominant broadcasting medium. A specific
BBC Children’s Department only emerged in 1951. The Corporation’s first Director-
General, “Lord Reith and his subalterns felt the need to shelter and heal the young”
(ibid.) in the immediate post-war broadcasting environment. The first inkling of
commercial concern for the BBC began when ITV started transmitting in 1955; when
the corporation ceased being the sole broadcaster in the television medium. In
1956, ITV began “importing some arresting American fare, which was slick and
nowhere near as tasteless as many at the Corporation had rather superciliously
considered it to be”5 (p. 36), and in the second quarter of 1956, ITV was attracting a
staggering three times more child viewers than the BBC.
The rise in what Lord Reed called, “compulsiveness” 6 (ibid. p. 40), or
eagerness for compulsive and popular viewing, seemed to be accompanied with a
commensurate rise in suspicion of American imports – perhaps also laced with a
little jealousy. Whether stemming from xenophobia, or perhaps some sort of
commercial hypnophobia with the presumption that the audiences were young, and
thus vulnerable and passive, concern regarding children’s television becoming too
commercial emerged early on. Although opinions are divided on how and what to
provide for children in terms of media messages, adults do at least agree on the
necessity to nurture and care for young minds: “the existence of such concerns is
universal” (Davies, 2004, p. 429), of an essentially human provenance, reinforced
5 Amongst the popular imports were Popeye, Hopalong Cassidy, and Lassie 6 From a BBC meeting held on 22 November 1960
8
with “a range of institutional provisions for children, all ultimately originating in
what could be seen as a biological evolutionary need for socialization and
protection (survival) and all invoking the responsibility of adult society, whether
corporate, state or personal (parents, community), for the care and moral training
of the young” (ibid.). In other words, the reaction to protect children is a biological
imperative, an ingrained trait that has been carried through into modern society.
Media globalisation is often associated with restriction of “people’s free space for
expression and thought,” (Hamelink, 2002, p. 39) violating “their privacy through
data mining and related data collection techniques,” and undermining “their
citizenship by perceiving them primarily as consumers”. From that preconception
therefore, it is unsurprising that when Sesame Street was created in the late 1960s,
the BBC refused to buy it, “not so much on ideological grounds as on the basis of
its style of pedagogy” (Buckingham, 2007, p. 51). What was seen as “‘advertising
techniques’ for drilling children in letter and number recognition was seen as
somehow at odds with the more child-centred, play-oriented British tradition of pre-
school education” (ibid.). Nevertheless, there is something a little loaded and
unsettling about the term, “British tradition”.
The BBC has been exercising cultural and economic protectionism in varying
degrees of severity over the years, perhaps attempting to preserve that so-called
‘British tradition’ in programme-making and media messages, blockading imports
and censoring messages going to impressionable minds. The head of children’s
programming for eleven years from 1967, Monica Sims, “showed no trace of regret”
(Inglis, 2003, p. 52) from the decision to reject Sesame Street, despite its
subsequent success on ITV and Channel 4: “Why diminish the chance of producing a
successful homegrown show by spending it in an inferior foreign product?” was the
way “her thinking went”, Inglis concludes. Sims saw too much of a cultural disparity
between British children, and the American, poverty-stricken preschoolers of inner
city New York whom Sesame Street was trying to reach. In that sense, the messages
that Sesame Street was trying to proliferate were not yet globalised enough. And yet
that globalisation is very often now at the heart of debate, and “Americanness”, as
9
Buckingham puts it, has become “the default position, something so universal and
so unquestioned that it has become effectively invisible” (2007, p. 48).
However, to reiterate Buckingham as prefaced (p. vi), “economic domination
does not necessarily translate directly into ideological or cultural domination” (p.
47). The Children’s Television Workshop (CTW), which rebranded as the Sesame
Workshop in 2000, was a subsidiary of National Educational Television, the
predecessor of the America PBS (Public Broadcast Service) (Morrow, 2006, p. 5). In
the words of Malcolm Gladwell, CTW’s founding producer, Joan Ganz Cooney,
wanted to create an “educational virus… a learning epidemic to counter the
prevailing epidemics of poverty and illiteracy” (2000, p. 89). Gladwell’s biological
analogy is useful in that it suggests that Cooney was able to inject her pedagogical
ideologies into the commercial hegemony, to proliferate educational values. Her
approach was both pragmatic and guerrilla in style, exploiting the strengths of
television, the way it operates as a business, leveraging its ability to grab attention
and reach out to a large population, and to do so cheaply, transmitting educational
messages inside a colourful, commercial package. Quite simply, CTW “borrowed
techniques from children’s commercials to teach” (ibid. p. 90), hiring Jim Henson,
who already had a long career in television creating TV spots for children’s and
variety shows like The Ed Sullivan Show, producing over 300 advertisements for
Wilkins Coffee company, and much more besides (Finch, 1993, pp. 1-49). Explaining
his success, Jim Henson said,
[advertising] agencies believed that the hard sell was the only way to get their message over
on television. We took a very different approach. We tried to sell things by making people
laugh. (ibid. p. 22)
In a 1968, Sesame Street pitch film, speaking of their production approach, David
Connell said, “we’re planning to treat them the same way, essentially the same way,
a commercial enterprise would create a campaign, but we're trying to sell the
alphabet to preschool children” (Goldstein Knowlton & Hawkins, 2006). Sesame
Street successfully sold pro-learning values, making education entertaining and
10
attention grabbing, and “every time the show has been tested – and Sesame Street
has been subject to more academic scrutiny than any other television show in
history – it has been proved to increase the reading and learning skills of its viewers”
(Gladwell, 2000, p. 91).
Sesame Street is a paradigm of demographically malleable polysemy (cf.
Fiske, 1988, p. 126), which presents advantages from a viewpoint of audience
appeal, possessing traits appealing to both children and adults. As the series has
expanded and grown, so has its audience along with it. Sesame Street has an
extensive back catalogue appreciated by children and also adults seeking some
laughs and nostalgia, or to borrow from the words of Buckingham, those seeking
“opportunities for nostalgic fantasies about their own past” (1997, p. 286). In a
display of business naivety and lack of foresight, in the Seventies, “the BBC
destroyed three-quarters of its film and video archives… they had no conception of
the rolls of cash they were almost literally burning along with the celluloid spools”
(Inglis, 2003, p. 29). At the time, the work of the Children’s Television Workshop
was years ahead of the BBC Children’s Department in every facet, from business
sense to conceptual design and pedagogical research. What the BBC’s Monica Sims
saw as “offensive”, just “jingles and repetition – the rhythm of commercial
advertising” (ibid. p. 79), was in fact “deliberately and painstakingly engineered”
(Gladwell, 2000, p. 100), using pioneering quantitative research in conjunction with
expertise from experienced television producers. Sesame Street’s key personnel
included former executive producer of Captain Kangaroo, David Connell, and
Edward L. Palmer, who headed internal research (Morrow, 2006, pp. 67-84). Captain
Kangaroo won a Peabody Award at a time of growing concern that children’s
television was becoming far too commercialised. The 1957 award lauded the
programme as “almost the only genuine children’s program on network television,
certainly the only one that puts the welfare of the children ahead of that of the
sponsor… without interrupting the serious business of entertaining them at the
same time” (ibid. pp. 20-21). The juxtaposition of the words ‘serious business’ and
‘entertaining’ is quite a telling one, and an important example of the normalised
11
articulation and equation of ‘business’ with ‘entertainment’. In other words, to
borrow from Máire Messenger Davies, “[m]any of us persist in trying to ‘improve’
our children through ‘educational’ activities, overlooking (and surely forgetting) that,
for a child, the best toy, the best game, the best story and the best programme, is
one that is fun” (1989, p. 135). The Peabody Award was not only recognising of the
value of Captain Kangaroo, but it was also tacitly acknowledging that ‘business’,
‘education’, and ‘entertainment’ could co-exist. Sesame Street took the instinctive,
television expertise of the likes of Jim Henson and David Connell, and combined it
with academic expertise.
Extensive studies in the 1960s and 70s by Elizabeth Lorch, and in particular
Daniel Anderson of the University of Massachusetts who also acted as a consultant
on Captain Kangaroo, found that children were very sophisticated and selective in
their television viewing. One study took a re-edited episode of Sesame Street with
selected key scenes out of order. “If kids were only interested in flash and dash”
(Gladwell, 2000, p. 101); the colourful action that Sims found so objectionable, then
“that shouldn’t have made a difference”. However, it did make a difference. Lorch
and Anderson found that if the children could not make sense of what they were
seeing, they stopped watching. Another study took two groups of five-year-olds in a
Sesame Street screening. One group was placed in a room with many attractive toys,
and the other without. Quite predictably they found that the former group paid less
attention to the episode, about 47% of the time to the TV, whilst the latter group
watched about 87% of the time. However, when tested for understanding of the
episode, the two groups managed the same test results; both assimilated
information equally well. Lorch and Anderson concluded that the children in the
toys group watched strategically, stating that the toy group children were
“distributing their attention between toy play and viewing so that they look at what
for them were the most informative parts of the program. This strategy was so
affective that the children could gain no more form increased attention” (ibid.). The
ramifications of both studies together, dispelled the assumption that children were
a passive audience. In television’s early history, it was not commonly held that
12
audiences are active. That is, children can pick and choose to be engaged in other
activities or thoughts during an advertisement break (Anderson, et al. 2003, p. 278).
Children look away when they were bored, and to borrow conclusions from
qualitative audience research conducted by Buckingham, Hannah and Kelly, “[b]eing
boring – while it means different things for different children... - [is] a cardinal
signifier of a lack of cultural value” (2000, p. 19). By extension, in Gladwell’s words,
“Sesame Street was built about a single, breakthrough insight: that if you can hold
the attention of children, you can educate them” (2000, p. 100). That statement
seems tautological, but it also seems to be a simple lesson often forgotten or
ignored: To reiterate Davies, “the best programme, is one that is fun” (1989, p. 135).
Albert Einstein is supposed to have once said, “[t]oo many of us look upon
Americans as dollar chasers. This is a cruel libel, even if it is reiterated
thoughtlessly by the Americans themselves” (Wikiquote, 2009). From Sims
comments, she may have shared that preconception. And to summarise on what
has already been alluded to, the major factor in the BBC’s decision to reject Sesame
Street was not solely on commercial or pedagogical grounds, it seems that it was on
what Inglis described as, “residual anti-Americanism… They [the BBC] were public
service broadcasters, after all, and proud of their non-commercial, homegrown [sic]
output” (2003, p. 80). It can be argued that the constant that has placed Sesame
Street at loggerheads with the BBC’s home-grown children’s television was, and still
is, a continued suspicion of a particular articulation of ‘Americaness’, that being
American commercialism. The connotations of the term ‘Americaness’ have been
mutable, but always derived from a position of competition – intellectual,
ideological, and commercial. From an external, non-American standpoint, there is a
governmental obligation to determine law and policy to the benefit of each nation
state. The BBC is seen as the British public service broadcaster. However, to reprise
the preface to this chapter, commercial hegemony can function as a medium in
itself, not just as a proliferator of itself, but also a conduit for, and carrier of, many
other messages. That is not to say that the tendency has not been toward a
particular effacement of diversity espoused by the dominant ‘big four’ media
13
producers. As was felt very early on by the BBC and what continues to be, “a key
issue is ‘cultural invasion’ of imported programmes, mostly of American origin,
which has actually become greater with the increase of dedicated children’s
channels” (Davies & Thornham, 2007, p. 16). The commercial threat to global
diversity as been internationally recognized and ratified by the UN Convention on
the Rights of the Child held in 1989. Articles 17 and 297, in relation to the Sesame
Workshop, are of particular focus in the following chapter. Sesame Street has
assuaged the persistent fear of homogenisation within the commercial hegemony
by adapting itself according to the curricula and perceived needs of each nation
state. Having its origins from a time of great civil and political turmoil in the United
States, it has always been multicultural. By adapting and working with local
producers, it has grown more and more multicultural. And in 2008, Sesame Street
paved its way to Northern Ireland via the Sesame Tree series.
7 See appendix.
14
2. Background: Imperialism and the Socio-Historical
Conditions that Grew the Sesame Tree
I think the question of cultural imperialism is a good one, and one that we’re contending with
all the time. And I think, what we like to think is that… we’re engaging in a model that takes
a framework that’s worked here, and worked in other places, that then other people can adapt.
Charlotte F. Cole8 (Goldstein Knowlton & Hawkins, 2006)
After narrowly averting a nuclear holocaust in 1962 during the Cuban Missile Crisis,
the late Sixties and early Seventies, were no less a tumultuous time, with the Civil
Rights Movement, anti-war protests, Cambodian Campaign and Vietnam War to
name just a few of the most prominent events in recent American history: “This was
the Sixties, and every night you would turn your television set on and the news
would tell you, cities were burning, leaders were being assassinated, riots were
being held at universities (anti-war riots), and so it was as if people were saying, ‘so
do something,’ to the television set”, recalled Joan Ganz Cooney (ibid.). In a sense,
the climate of civil unrest coupled with middle-class complaints of television’s over-
commercialism, was the catalyst that galvanised and synergised educational, public,
broadcast, charitable and government agencies (cf. Morrow, 2006, pp. 26-29). The
Sesame Street project secured over $8 million for its first two years of development
between 1968 and 1970. The top five contributors were, the Office of Education,
Research Bureau ($3,325,000), the Ford Foundation ($1,538,000), the Carnegie
Corporation ($1,500,000), the Corporation for Public Broadcasting ($625,900), and
the Office of Economic Opportunity, ‘Head Start’ ($625,000) (ibid. p. 62). With both
public and private support, Sesame Street was the most expensive children’s
television series ever televised at that time, first airing in the US in November 1969.
The resources devoted to the development of Sesame Street were testament to the
mood of desperation – a public and private consensus that action had to be taken. 8 Charlotte F. Cole, PhD. is Vice President of Education & Research at the Sesame Workshop
15
In 1964, “President Lyndon B. Johnston convened the Kerner Commission to
examine television to see if it induced violence in its viewers” (Inglis, 2003, pp. 77-
78). Its academic veracity notwithstanding, “the Commission announced in a
Surgeon-General’s report ‘that violence… on television did affect behaviour
adversely’”. This paved the way for subsequent support for more didactic and
interventionist forms of programme-making: To cite Carmen Luke, “[w]hether 17th-
century religious or secular school books, 18th-century travelogues, nursery-verse
or story books, or 1940s and 1950s comic books – the aim of children’s books and
children’s literacy has always been to tame the uncivilized, pre-literate unruly child
through pedagogical and moral didacticism” (1994, p. 308). Perhaps “1950s comic
books” are slightly inappropriate analogues given Robert Hutchins’ criticism of
television during those years: “It is as though movable type has been devoted
exclusively since Gutenberg’s time to the publication of comic books” (Inglis, 2003,
p. 77). Hutchins was not only a well-respected innovator in the field of education,
but also the associate director of the Ford Foundation, the second highest funding
contributor. Nonetheless, Luke’s argument has credence. Sesame Street was a
prototype, didactic ‘framework’ that would eventually, and very quickly in fact, be
exported and adapted to other countries across the globe, fuelling more debate
over America’s cultural imperialism.
Cooney likens the role of the Sesame Workshop producers with that of, in
her words, “old fashioned missionaries”, not disseminating religion, but spreading
the values of “learning and tolerance and love and mutual respect” (Goldstein
Knowlton & Hawkins, 2006). Although altruistic in motivation and intention,
Cooney’s statement draws parallels with an “interventionist post-colonial
imperialism” (Schiller, 2005, p. 450), which is problematic for the Sesame
Workshop’s need to disassociate itself from the cultural or American imperialism
that Charlotte Cole alludes to in the opening quotation of this chapter: In centuries
past, “missionaries served as ideological agents of imperial rule, legitimating the
right of the imperial power to transform local belief systems and impose its values,
standards, laws, and interests outside the borders of its state” (ibid. p. 449).
16
However, to reiterate Cooney, Sesame Street is not spreading religion, and is careful
to mitigate any suggestions of cultural imperialism by working closely with local
producers, writers and crew. In short, the Sesame Workshop was a pioneering
practitioner of ‘glocalism’, “characterized by the exclusive predominance of global
flows moving through localities, which have frequently broken down their structures,
bending them to their interests and to their strategies” (Bressi, 2003, p. 5).
American professor of Anthropology, Nina Glick Schiller would categorise this
strategy as a subset of Transnationalism, distinct from Globalism, where
Globalisation “refers to periods of relatively increased unequal integration of the
world through capitalist production, distribution, marketing, and consumption”,
whereas in Transnational Studies, “State actors and institutions are understood to
be important participants in shaping but not limiting the social, cultural, economic,
and political linkages of people” (2005, p. 440). This is a useful distinction in
examining the phenomenon of glocalisation, as it may cast off some of the
connotations typically articulated with older colonialist, imperialist and capitalist
models of globalisation.
The extensively researched ‘CTW Model’9 (Morrow, 2006, pp. 67-84) or
Sesame Workshop approach, with its ingrained messages of tolerance and mutual
respect, pre-empted and tapped into a global desire expressed in the principles of
the United Nations, Convention on the Rights of the Child, held in November 1989.
Article 29.1 (d) states that education should prepare “the child for responsible life in
a free society, in the spirit of understanding, peace, tolerance, equality of sexes,
and friendship among all peoples, ethnic, national and religious groups and
persons of indigenous groups” (Hamelink, 2002, p. 35). The charter was “ratified by
191 of the 193 UN member states” (von Feilitzen, 2002, p. 16), demonstrating a
consensus towards messages for a universal altruism, but also distinct from
universalism or homogeneity, acknowledging that education should also be directed
to (c) the “development of respect for the child’s parents, his or her own cultural
9 Since rebranding in 2000, Sesame Workshop literature, presentations and so on, refers to the ‘CTW model’ as the ‘Sesame Workshop model’.
17
identity, language and values, for the national values of the country in which the
child is living, the country from which he or she may originate and for civilizations
from his or her own” (Hamelink, 2002, pp. 34-35). As long as the cultural identity
and values of (c) do not contradict the ethnic and cultural inclusivity of (d), then
there is no problem. However, cultural differences are more often than not, one of
the key obstacles of reconciliation in conflict, and recent post-conflict zones.
Mirroring and partly inspired by the Civil Rights Movement in the States,
Northern Ireland’s civil rights struggles began most visibly in 1968 with the Derry
march. Killings of The Troubles had commenced two years prior and, needless to
say, escalated in more demonstrations, marches, riots and deaths10. Former head of
News and Current Affairs, and Chief Editorial Advisor at BBC Northern Ireland, Keith
Baker recalled, “through the hunger strikes, Gibraltar, Enniskillen, the Anglo-Irish
Agreement and all the loyalist protests which followed it, a particularly difficult time
for our reporting staff who were often attacked once the cameras were seen and the
letters ‘BBC’ mentioned” (1996, pp. 120-121): “‘B’ for British was a centre of
controversy” (ibid.), carrying with it the baggage of “imperialism, colonialism
sectarianism and state repression” (Rolston, 2007, p. 346). The late Keith Kyle,
former political and parliamentary correspondent for The Economist, and reporter
on the Tonight programme from 1969 to 1980, “was hardly a stranger to political
breakdown and civil strife”, having spent time as “a foreign correspondent in the
United States during the civil rights’ movement, in Africa and the Middle East” (1996,
p. 105). However, those countries were somewhat “exotic”, whereas Northern
Ireland was a domestic crisis. Conveying to the rest of the United Kingdom, that
part of the country “could involve the extensive use of violence, the burning of
houses, the expression of political views in vehemently sectarian terms” would
prove difficult. In David Butler’s words, “[t]here can be no impartial outcome where
the advance of one perspective may only be achieved at the expense of the other”
10 Due to necessary delimitation, some events are mentioned only in brief to contextualise discourse. A useful resource is the CAIN Web Service (Conflict Archive on the Internet, http://cain.ulst.ac.uk) based within the University of Ulster, containing information and source material on Northern Ireland conflict and politics.
18
(1996, p. 133). With so much history between, in and around the two traditions, and
multiple interpretations of anything said or done, a simple explanation would be
impossible. With political and logistical limitations, the “task was too huge for the
British media, so they settled on a fourth news value: ethnocentrism” (Rolston, 2007,
pp. 346-347).
As with the Civil Rights Movement in the States, Northern Ireland was not
singularly a matter of irrational hatred from some Hegelian notion of ‘otherness’
and identity affirmation, though that does play a role. “The civil rights
demonstrations were demanding full British rights, such as ending the system of
gerrymandering of local government constituencies and the unfair allocation of jobs
and housing and other resources on the basis of religion” (Kyle, 1996, p. 106).
Sesame Street first broadcast after American federal and government legislature
with the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Immigration and Nationality Services Act of
1965, and the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and ’68 (The National Archives, 2009). In
Northern Ireland, the discrimination and inequality was still flagrantly ingrained
within the Repressive State Apparatus, the events of the Derry March in October
1968 just one of the more visible examples among many. RTÉ (Raidió Teilifís
Éireann), the Republic of Irelands’ public service broadcaster, was present at the
march to film the RUC’s (Royal Ulster Constabulary’s) heavy-handed use of force11.
Immediately following the demonstration, “there were two days of serious rioting in
Derry between the Catholic residents of the city and the RUC” (CAIN, 2009).
Coverage was worldwide. To cite Keith Kyle, violence is an “indispensable part of
the technique of non-violence… it becomes exceedingly difficult for television to be
both impartial and responsible, two ideals that usually run together” (1996, p. 108).
11 The NMNI (National Museums Northern Ireland) Ulster Museum in Belfast will be opening about forty new installations at the end of October 2009. I had the privilege to edit the archive footage for the museums audio-visual installations, which includes a montage of the Civil Rights March in Derry, 1968. Opening with the song ‘We Shall Overcome’, which became the anthem for the American Civil Rights Movement, the montage shows the RUC baton charge on peaceful but nevertheless deemed illegal demonstrators, intercut with interviews of MP Gerry Fitt after the march. The actual bloodied shirt that he wore on the march will also be on display (cf. http://www.nmni.com; cf. CAIN)
19
With the deployment of British soldiers in 1969, whom were initially
welcomed by the Catholic community since the RUC were so distrusted, followed by
the introduction of internment in 1971, relations between public and state rapidly
deteriorated. Of course, events have been drastically condensed to expedite and
delimit discourse, but the focal point for the moment is that “the state has a
definitive authority in establishing the limits of broadcasting in Britain” (Butler,
1996, p. 128), and as such, can be seen as one aspect and reflection of state policy.
As an example of the increasingly authoritarian stance of the state, leaping ahead
to October 1988, “objectivity… was dealt a severe blow” (Baker, 1996, p. 122) when
the Thatcher government introduced the ‘Broadcasting Ban’. “The ban affected 11
loyalist and republican organisations but Sinn Fein, the political wing of the IRA,
was the main target” (Welch, 2005). The BBC audaciously circumvented this by using
voice actors to overdub Sinn Féin statements.
Sesame Tree would not come about until a decade after the April 1998, Good
Friday Agreement12, which itself would not be drafted until after a thirty-year period
of violence, obfuscation, collusion between police and paramilitaries, secret
negotiations, and espionage (e.g. cf. CAIN 2009; cf. Police Ombudsman for
Northern Ireland, 1998). Belligerence would not be tamed “through pedagogical and
moral didacticism” (Luke, 1994, p. 308), as it was clear that the state was in need of
some reformations, and that the history, culture and politics were far more complex.
Northern Ireland’s Troubles were not simply result of ignorance and ethnocentrism.
From its inception, Sesame Street was inclusive and multicultural, “has aired for
nearly 40 years in the United States and now in over 120 other countries, [and] was
designed to promote respect and understanding among children of different
backgrounds” (Cole, et al. p. 359). Although, built on decades of pedagogical
research and testing with child audiences, it is ill equipped to deal with the
complexities of political and civil conflict. War is an adult game. Nevertheless, the
Sesame Workshop has aspirations to extend its remit to encompass issues of
12 cf. http://www.nio.gov.uk/the-agreement
20
conflict, if not conflict resolution, which can be seen as a natural progression for
the show that Cooney described as “a perpetual experiment” (Morrow, 2006, p. 161).
It has, however, run into difficulty because of it, a little over a decade ago with its
Middle Eastern adaptation of Sesame Street, Shara’a Simsim.
The Republican and Sinn Féin stance on Gaza, Palestine and Israel has been
to express solidarity with Palestinians, seeing parallels between Irish history and
that of the Middle East. It has in the past and more recently, left Sinn Féin open to
criticism of “stoking the fires of terrorism across the globe” (News Letter, 2009). In
the late Nineties, the Sesame Workshop “came to grief” with Shara'a Simsim, which
attempted to appeal to both Israeli and Palestinian children simultaneously “and
thus become a force for peace and reconciliation” (Inglis, 2003, p. 170). Combining
Arabic and Hebrew narration was highly problematic, as “each side tends to regard
the other’s language as the ‘language of death’”. However, Sesame Workshop’s
main misstep was the introduction of “a new character in the form of a thoughtful
Israeli soldier, designed to humanize the Israelis in the eyes of Palestinian viewers”.
It “was hastily scrapped when CTW’s own rulebook was found to forbid military
plotlines of any kind” (ibid. pp. 170-171). Dehumanisation is one of the inherent
qualities of wearing a uniform, especially a military one. Employing a “counter-
stereotypic” (Cole, et al. p. 411), humanising strategy to a figure of war and state
(oppressive or otherwise) can be construed, at best as bias, and worse, as
propaganda. In the case of Rechov Sumsum or Shara’a Simsim (Sesame Street in
Hebrew and Arabic respectively), and similar co-productions, the Sesame
Workshop’s plan is to support the process of peace at a “person-to-person level,
rather than at a political one” (ibid. p. 410). The didactic and pedagogical dilemma
confronted with each co-production is summed up by Sesame Workshop director of
international research, Elizabeth Nisbet’s consideration that, “[politics] has
everything to do with what we’re doing, but it also has nothing to do with what
we’re doing” (Goldstein Knowlton & Hawkins, 2006). Noam Chomsky would be less
kind. From a libertarian standpoint, Shara’a Simsim could be seen as neoliberal
propaganda, under a banner of a “so-called 'right' of humanitarian intervention”
21
(Chomsky, 2003, p. 14). Media activist and “Palestinian executive producer, Daoud
Kuttab, whose studio in Ramallah was damaged by Israeli soldiers” was sceptical of
the programme having any positive action: “‘You're telling them to be tolerant to
Israelis when Israeli tanks are outside their homes’” (Younge, 2002).
Without going into the intricacies of Jewish-American connections, reciprocal
voting at UN Security and General Council assemblies, financial and military aid,
America has a long-standing, ‘special relationship’ with Israel (Chomsky, 1999, pp.
48-53). To cite only a few examples of many, from “fiscal years 1978 through 1982,
Israel received 48% of all U.S. military aid and 35% of U.S. economic aid, worldwide”
and for fiscal year “1983, the Reagan administration requested almost $2.5 billion
for Israel out of a total aid budget of $8.1 billion, including $500 million in outright
grants and $1.2 billion in low-interest loans”. Chomsky sees Israel like the modern
equivalent of Sparta; “performing dirty work that the U.S. is unable to undertake
itself because of popular opposition or other costs” (ibid. p. 20); it is an important
geographical and military foothold in the Middle East. The point of these figures is
not solely to critique American foreign policy, but also to illustrate the United States’
transnational connections. America has had another ‘special relationship’ with
Britain since at least 1946, when Winston Churchill coined the term in a speech at
Westminster College, Fulton, Missouri (NATO Online Library, 2001). The Anglo-
American ‘special relationship’ has seen through many administrations, from
Churchill and Roosevelt, Macmillan and Kennedy, Reagan and Thatcher, Clinton and
Major, to Blair, Clinton and Bush to name just a handful. Today we have Gordon
Brown and Barack Obama.
America also has connections with Ireland that run far and deep. The Irish-
American emigrants could be described as a “global tribe”; what Giovanni Bressi
describes as “‘diasporas’ of emigrants (or former emigrants) from all continents of
the world to all the continents of the world [whom] constitute very important
bridges of glocalization” (2003, p. 11). One such family of Irish Diasporas of great
significance were the Kennedys, who were probably the most famous of Irish-
American families. In 1963, the same year as his assassination, on his visit to
22
Ireland, “President John F. Kennedy joined with Irish President Eamonn de Valera to
form The American Irish Foundation” (The Ireland Funds, 2008). A little over four
decades on, the fund raised $1 million for the Sesame Workshop to help develop
Sesame Tree, Northern Ireland. Another Kennedy with direct significance to the Irish
peace process was the late Senator Edward M. ‘Ted’ Kennedy, who died from brain
cancer on August 25, 2009. In 1994, Ted Kennedy had lobbied Bill Clinton to ignore
objections from the John Major, Conservative government regarding Gerry Adams
being granted a US visa. The Senator was convinced that Adams and the Sinn Féin
leadership were “serious about steering the IRA away from the ‘armed struggle’ cul-
de-sac and into constitutional politics… seven months after Adams was finally
granted his US visa, the IRA declared its ceasefire on 31 August” (McDonald, 2009).
In November 1995, President William J. ‘Bill’ Clinton appointed George J. Mitchell as
special advisor to the president of the United States, and secretary of state for
economic initiatives in Ireland. His reports called for “phasing-out guerrilla weapons
in Northern Ireland” (Bowdoin College, 2004) and his role as mediator were
instrumental in the peace negotiations and the Good Friday Agreement of 1998.
Mitchell described the Act as necessarily imperfect, in his words, “not in a sense a
final act but an important step in a process toward achieving the objective” (Watt,
2009). Probably of minute significance, but worth a mention as a curious
coincidental connection to children’s media, George Mitchell was a company
director of the Walt Disney Company from 1995, and Chairman of the Board from
2004 (The Walt Disney Company, 2009), up until 2007 (Holson, 2006). In 1999, he
received the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian honour, for his work
in Northern Ireland (Altman, 2009) as well as an honorary knighthood from the
Queen. Appointed as special envoy to the Middle East by President Barack Obama, it
is hoped that he will “bring the same quiet determination to negotiations on the
Israeli-Arab front that he did as Bill Clinton's intermediary in the Troubles” (Watt,
2009).
Drawing parallels between Israeli-Palestinian and British-Irish relations,
Chomsky writes, “Northern Ireland… is far from a paradise but vastly improved over
23
the days when Britain ignored legitimate grievances in favor of force” (2003, p. 115).
In November 1990, the then Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Peter Brooke
stated, “Britain had no ‘strategic or economic interest’ in Northern Ireland and
would accept unification of Ireland if that were the wish of the people of Northern
Ireland” (Rolston & McVeigh, 2007, p. 2). Taoiseach Bertie Ahern and Prime Minister
Tony Blair’s New Labour government worked towards establishing a devolved,
power-sharing government in the North, eventually leading to the Good Friday
Agreement and “the Republic abandoning its claim to the whole island of Ireland by
dropping Articles 2 and 3 of the Constitution” (ibid.). It seems that neither British
nor Irish states want the burden of Northern Ireland. In 2006, the St. Andrews
Agreement13 dealing with amendments to the original 1998 Good Friday Agreement
and, among other goals, the contentious issue of policing was incentivised with a
“pounds-for-powersharing package” worth £1 billion (McDonald, 2009). The
financial rewards would not be available without cross party unanimity: A simple
demonstration that the consequence or “result of self-centered localism is a lack of
development, the non-entrance or the exit from processes of modernization, and
the failure to grasp the opportunities offered by the scientific and technological
revolution underlying globalization” (Bressi, 2003, p. 7). Smaller, local examples of
incentivising gentrification are Social Development, Arts Council, and Community
Arts grants, some of which have been made available to paint over loyalist murals,
with the rationale being “that loyalism is to be killed with kindness” (Rolston &
McVeigh, 2007, p. 19). Sesame Tree is part of the same rationale, effectively a
Sesame Workshop donation to BBC Northern Ireland, and a provision of work for
local programme developers and television crew.
However, to reprise a now familiar theme of commercial hegemony, the
market can ebb as quickly as it can flow. During the frenzied UK housing market
boom that massively inflated in Belfast in particular, on a Nationalist-Loyalist
interface between Ardoyne and Glenbryn once dubbed “murder mile”, one four-
13 http://www.nio.gov.uk/northern_ireland_(_st_andrews_agreement)_bill.pdf
24
bedroom property placed on the market for an already turgid £285,000, reached a
ridiculous £800,000 at auction (Bowcott, 2007), presumably to redevelop as luxury
apartments. Then came the ‘credit crunch’ and house price crash, and the
worldwide economic downturn has demonstrated that “Northern Ireland remains
umbilically linked to the British subvention”; a “life-support machine reliance on the
UK Treasury” (McDonald, 2009), which is hardly an incentive for Irish reunification
and only goes to reinforce Peter Brooke’s statement that Britain has ‘no strategic or
economic interest’ in Northern Ireland. In the UK broadcasting ecology, the
recession has resulted in an “increasingly perilous state of investment in UK public
service programming” (Sweney, 2009) with children’s television hit the hardest. BBC
spending on children's programming fell from £97 million in 2004, to £77 million
by 2008, nearly a 21% drop. ITV, Channel 4 and Channel Five spending on
homegrown children's programming in the same period fell by 70% (ibid.).
Nevertheless, or perhaps increasingly because of recession, Glocalism and
the “glocal approach... appears to have gained global recognition to an increasing
extent, particularly after the Twin Towers, the collapse of the new economy, the
crisis in international financial markets,” according to Bressi (2003, p. 9).
Prophetically writing in 2003, Bressi was concerned with “the emergence of a
serious risk of a world recession, and the prospect of potentially destabilizing
military conflict” (ibid.). Evidently, his concerns were predominantly due to the Bush
administration at that time, when “fear of the United States had reached remarkable
heights throughout the world, along with distrust of the political leadership”
(Chomsky, 2003, p. 4). President George W. Bush’s foreign policy stance had
become unapologetically interventionist after 9-11, which had a profound affect on
America’s world outlook. To quote Barbara (Basia) Nikonorow, Sesame Workshop
producer assigned to the Kosovo Co-Production: “After September 11th, we've seen
our company sort of take a new direction to embrace mutual respect and
understanding as a core curriculum in an even more apparent manner than we have
in the past” (Goldstein Knowlton & Hawkins, 2006). Sesame Street has even made
its way to Afghanistan with Koche Simsim, a redeveloped and redubbed version of
25
Alam Simsim, the Egyptian Sesame (USA Today, 2008). “The best thing parents who
want their children to grow up with liberal values can do is make sure there is a
liberal world for them to grow up in”, writes Gary Younge, who signs off his article
for the Guardian with, “[t]his column was brought to you by the letters P, E, A, C
and E, tragically complicated by the numbers 9 and 11” (2002).
By entering into conflict zones and failed states that are barely at the first
stages of peace processes, the Sesame Workshop runs the risk of inadvertently
making alliances with authoritarian, often American, repressive power. Sesame
Workshop’s extension of its remit to include media messages against belligerence
may be unconsciously ignorant of genuine struggles against oppression, distracting
attention from political grievance, reducing social injustices to ethnocentrism. By
blending pedagogy and moral didacticism with the commercial hegemony, using
the strengths of Transnationalism for altruistic media messages, the global ‘family’
of Sesame Street programmes may have unwittingly contributed to the evolution of
even more invisible and possibly insidious forms of commercial hegemony and
neoliberal imperialism. Gary E. Knell, president and CEO of Sesame Workshop said,
“Even hardened revolutionaries who have fought and been involved in difficult
political struggles don’t want to raise their children in that kind of environment”
(Goldstein Knowlton & Hawkins, 2006). Perhaps the surrender of self-determination
really is the lesser of evils.
In the case of Sesame Tree Northern Ireland, by the time the series was
first aired in 2008, much of the major political squabbles had reached accord.
Additionally, Western, Anglophonic, First World Northern Ireland has much more of
a common heritage with Britain and America, than Kosovo, Palestine or Afghanistan:
“Internationally, the Six Counties has shifted from being a key symbol of anti-
imperialist struggle to one of the success stories of the new Anglo-American
imperial orthodoxy” (Rolston & McVeigh, 2007, p. 20). The BBC, during Monica Sims’
years, may have expressed an anti-American sentiment a form of cultural
protectionism, but such “[s]elf-centered localism remains essentially a ‘temptation,’
but in concrete terms it is becoming both less frequent and less possible in today's
26
world” (Bressi, 2003, p. 8). Sesame Tree is a poster child of the peace dividend as
much as Northern Ireland is a poster child for Anglo-American co-operation – “a
shining example of the new imperialism – a foretaste of what was to be achieved in
Iraq and proof that Bush and Blair were not ‘warmongers’ but rather peacemakers”
(Rolston & McVeigh, 2007, p. 20). In 2003, a simultaneously bizarre, ominous and
ironic news report described the use of “culturally offensive” music to “break” Iraqi
prisoners of war (BBC News, 2003). The US military’s Psychological Operations
Company deprived prisoners of sleep by repeatedly playing music such as those
from the band Metallica, music from the children’s television show Barney, and of
course, the Sesame Street theme song. Sesame Tree, being Anglophonic, though
later dubbed into Irish Gaelic, has a differing theme song, written and performed by
local band, Duke Special, helping to (g)localise and distinguish it from the American
original. As Northern Ireland has become increasingly multicultural, more attractive
to migrant workers due to the peace dividend, racism has become much more of a
focus in recent times. One of the major discourses of the following chapter is
Sesame Tree in the context of sectarianism and racism, and the Sesame Workshop
model of dealing with learning and complex emotions, and promoting mutual
respect.
27
3. The ‘Glocal’ Processes of the Sesame Tree Project
“The raison d’être of Northern Ireland was sectarianism” (McVeigh, 2001, p. 631).
Sectarianism has been so long established and so ingrained; it might even be called
a tradition. “In few places elsewhere in the world, I think, is a historical event three
hundred years before”, wrote Keith Kyle in 1996, “kept perpetually in the people’s
eye as having only happened yesterday in the way that the Battle of the Boyne is for
Unionists a triumphalist occasion” (p. 107). Despite the historic Good Friday
Agreement of 1998, and Northern Ireland becoming the poster child for peace (cf.
chapter 2, p. 26), “[s]ectarianism continues to profoundly structure where people
are born, where they go to school, where they live, where they work, where they
socialise, what sports teams they support and where they are buried” (Rolston &
McVeigh, 2007, p. 16). The term ‘sectarian’ has been “so routinely used by
politicians and the media” (McVeigh, 2001, p. 622), as a general adjective, and as a
prefix to words like ‘violence’, ‘act’, ‘killing’, ‘rioting’ and so on, it became the
“elephant in the living room” (Rolston & McVeigh, 2007, p. 16); impossible to deny,
difficult to talk about, and rarely defined. Rolston, after McVeigh, posits that “it is
necessary to attempt to overcome the under-theorisation of sectarianism by naming
it as what it in fact is, a form of racism” (ibid. p. 3).
As well as being an exploration of Sesame Tree’s didacticism and
methodology, this chapter is as much about what is not there as what is. Literature,
music, the visual arts, editing, are as much about the unoccupied spaces, as that
which occupies it, the silence and the sound, the things left in and the things cut
out, what is visible and what is invisible. Aspects of discourses in imperialism and
commercial hegemony, examined in the previous chapters, are analogous to that of
sectarianism and racism, in how each can become so pervasive that, for all intents
and purposes, they become the norm; “the default position, something so universal
and so unquestioned that it has become effectively invisible”, to reprise Buckingham
(2007, p. 48). Stuart Hall explains the insidiousness of ‘the default position’, and
28
the difficulties faced by those represented “only by their eloquent absence… or
refracted through the glance or gaze of others”:
If you are white, male, a businessman or a politician or a professional or a celebrity, your
chances of getting represented will be very high. If you are black, or a woman without social
status, or poor or working class or gay or powerless because you are marginal, you will
always have to fight to get heard or seen. This does not mean that no one from the latter
groups will ever find their way into the media. But it does mean that the structure of access to
the media is systematically skewed in relation to certain social categories. (1988, p. 9)
“Culture and race are not the same thing” but they are “intimately intertwined” (Lull,
1996, p. 67). This chapter is also about the ‘glocalisation’ process as applied to the
Sesame Tree project, and its efforts to open up a transnational worldview
encouraging inclusivity, tolerance and multiculturalism. Northern Ireland must look
outward if it is to have greater self-determination, to turn away from the “self-
centered localism” (2003, p. 7), that Bressi warned of, and sever its ‘umbilical’, state
and economic dependency on the rest of the United Kingdom (cf. chapter 1. p. 23-
24). To do this, the Sesame Tree series draws upon forty years of pedagogical
heritage of Sesame Street, which was designed to be inclusive and multicultural
from its inception.
Recently, it appears that, media coverage of the Troubles has been usurped
by reports of racial abuse. Racism in Northern Ireland has become of greater focus
since the Good Friday Agreement, with ominous headlines such as “Northern Ireland,
which is 99% white, is fast becoming the race-hate capital of Europe” (Chrisafis,
2004). In June 2009, over one hundred Romanian Gypsies were intimidated and
ousted from Belfast, and eventually flown home at the expense of the government:
“Over the past decade of peace and prosperity in Belfast, several thousand Asian,
African and Eastern European immigrants have settled in the roughest Protestant
districts of the city, where rents are lowest and empty properties plentiful”
(Pogatchnik, 2009). The peace process has “revealed a new raw nerve”, recession
augmented xenophobia of economic migrants, “workers mainly from Poland,
29
Lithuania and Romania” (Gergely, 2009).
Racism in its most basic terms may be defined as “a predisposition to
respond in an unfavourable manner to members of a racial group,” and according to
Aboud and Doyle, racial “prejudice appears to be high in children as young as 5
years of age" (2000, pp. 257-258). Concurrently, a recent University of Ulster study,
taking a sample of children in Northern Ireland, found that “children as young as
three can hold strong, prejudiced views" (University of Ulster, 2002). Paul Connolly’s
report for Barnardo’s and the Save the Children Fund also contained some
interesting comments. A six-year-old girl stated, ‘A Protestant is a bad person…
because they want to kill all Catholics’. A four-year-old girl stated, ‘Catholics are the
same as masked men, they smash windows’. An older, fourteen-year-old boy asserts,
‘Gypsies - they're all tramps, whores’, and a twelve-year-old boy stated, ‘If you sit on
a Chinese [person’s] wall they come out with knives… they sit and stare at you and
you’re waiting for them to turn on you”. According to the report, “1 in 3 NI
schoolchildren face sectarian threats, 2 in 3 ethnic minority children experience
racism” (ibid.). The need for projects promoting tolerance, such as Sesame Tree,
could scarcely be more salient and timely. Over four decades ago, aside from
literacy and pro-learning values, the second predominant function of the original
Sesame Street project was to promote racial inclusivity and mutual respect. As Joan
Ganz Cooney recalled, it did so by providing minority representation, allowing
human protagonists to interact with Muppets in a ‘real world’ setting:
We decided that the show would be completely integrated in terms of races and eventually in
terms of disabilities, and we set it in an urban street. Children's shows were always placed in
‘magic rooms’ or in suburbs, or somewhere not urban, so this was quite shocking.
(Goldstein Knowlton & Hawkins, 2006)
Much of Sesame Tree takes place within the hollow of a ‘question tree’, where
questions are brought and eventually answered, and where the series takes its
name. The attractive and colourful mise-en-scène is somewhat more fantastical, and
even more stylised than the urban derived settings of the original US, Sesame Street
30
series. Financial Times correspondent, Sarah Richards suggests, “it's easier to have
children hanging around a tree than decide if the street is in a Catholic or Protestant
neighbourhood” (2008).
Nevertheless, Muppets provide the framework to encourage children’s
curiosity of others and the world around them. One of two main protagonists, Potto,
is an agoraphobic, purple, monster inventor Muppet, who is never seen outside the
confines of the Sesame Tree (bar in the title sequence). He explores the world
vicariously, with help from Hilda, the inquisitive Irish hare Muppet. Through the use
of the ‘Pottoscope’, a sort of binocular video system allowing Potto to see Hilda’s
adventures, we get to see what children are up to from around Northern Ireland.
The narrative device allows children to see other local children from differing
backgrounds, utilising elementary drama to provide “paths to the understanding of
personal experience”, counterbalancing the predominant, global tendency to solely
employ non-human characters14 and fiction that “only digs deeper channels to
fantasy” (Kline, 1993, p. 314). However, there are only two episodes out of twenty in
which the Sesame Tree Muppets actually interact with human characters – the
penultimate episode and series finale. Nevertheless, there are advantages to being
non-human and racially indistinct, as seen with Takalani Sesame, and Kami (cf.
chapter 1. p. 4). Having a Muppet as a surrogate to explore difficult social questions
can be an advantage, as I will expand upon later. For the moment, the lack of
human and Muppet character interaction is not a didactic failure, but a mainly
logistical constraint, where budget and time were largely to factor. To once more
reprise Liebert and Sprafkin, “[u]nderstanding the way in which television is
operated, financed, and controlled as a business is essential to understanding the
medium and its messages” (1988, p. 21). And as a general rule, a project is never
perfect, never finished; it only runs out of time and money.
As is common with many television serials, each episode of Sesame Tree
follows a common, narrative framework, which helps audiences familiarise with the
14 cf. chapter 1, pp. 3-4
31
format of the programme. It is also a basic television, programme-making practice,
employing Fordian techniques for economy of scale, and utilising conveyor-belt-like
processes for efficiency, where each crewmember specialises and is responsible for
a specific area. To provide a brief guide, each fifteen-minute, ‘magazine style’
episode typically abides by the following sequence of events and structure: The title
sequence featuring specially composed music by Duke Special with lyrics by Ian
McDonald (writer and head of development for the show), transitions to an interior
scene of the Sesame Tree. Lead Muppets, Potto and Hilda banter briefly with a
scenario that follows particular educational goals, which become the narrative
themes that carry throughout the rest of the show segments. The ‘Big Whizzy
Machine’ (BWM), a kind of communications system, sounds its alarm, interrupting
Potto and Hilda’s banter. Alerted, the two Muppets operate the machine, and a child,
or sometimes a group of kids, asks a question that follows the educational theme of
the programme via the BWM screen. The Muppets ponder before going to consult
the resident Bookworm Muppets, whom provide information on where they can find
an answer to the question. Hilda consults the Weatherberries, berry-like Muppets
that also inhabit the Sesame Tree, on what the weather will be like on location. The
Weatherberries sing, but sometimes just give their answer, dependant on whether
the particular episode duration is running too long, in which case, the songs are
where most time can be cut without removing elements of script and dialogue.
Hilda exits to go to the location and the Weatherberries tell a joke. Potto, who is
beside his computer, reacts to their joke, and then consults ‘Monster Earth’, which
is an Internet-like application that allows us to see other films from around the
world, from a huge library of Sesame Workshop international co-production, ‘live
action films’ (International LAFs – although some are animation-based films, despite
the nomenclature). Potto then checks ‘Monster Babble’, to see what other Muppets
are up to, which allows us to tap into the library of sketches, or ‘limbo’ pieces, from
the original Sesame Street series, helping to further associate, and endorse the
Sesame Street brand. Potto then receives a phone call from Hilda indicating that she
has arrived at the location. He then uses the ‘Pottoscope’ to see Hilda introduce the
32
‘on location’ report or local ‘live action film’ (LAF). After the local LAF, we return to
Potto in the Sesame Tree, Hilda shortly returns, having found the answer. They
enter the answer into the ‘Big Whizzy Machine’ or BWM. The children, who asked the
question at the beginning of the show, thank the Sesame Tree through the BWM for
providing the answer, and the Muppets do a short recap before signing off. Finally,
the credits roll.
The magazine style structure of the programme, in short, is a mise-en-abîme
or ‘framing device’ that allows each Sesame Street co-production to cross-pollinate
media messages that are culturally distinct, but commonly themed, using each co-
production’s specific local Muppets to provide a framework for VT (video tape)
inserts. In the case of the Northern Ireland Sesame Tree co-production, Potto and
Hilda are our main Muppet presenters, performing the role of neutral, trustworthy
and entertaining guides to stories around and about Northern Ireland, and the
world. To recapitulate Timothy Havens, they are protagonists that “overcome racial
and ethnic differences” (2007; cf. chapter 1. p. 3), ‘glocalised’ non-human
characters, who have no religion or race bar that of being Muppet-kind, who
nonetheless come from Northern Ireland. They speak with Northern Irish regional
accents, use local dialect words like “beezer” instead of ‘great’ or ‘cool’, and
“gutties” in place of ‘trainers’ or ’sneakers’, and as Hilda is always leaving the
Sesame Tree to investigate different places around the country, then deductively,
the Sesame Tree must be a real place and a real tree, standing tall somewhere in
Northern Ireland, just like it does in the title sequence.
The glocalisation process takes advantage of local expertise to adapt media
messages for local reception, adopting cultural nuances in mise-en-scène, language
and expression. Sesame Workshop business development manager, and Bangladesh
co-production producer, Sean Love, summarises the Sesame process of local
adaptation, which involves “identifying what the needs are, and then coming up
with some sort of curriculum that addresses those needs, and then bringing
together researchers and creative people to produce a show… we rely very heavily
on local people” (Goldstein Knowlton & Hawkins, 2006). The local ‘live action films’
33
are particularly culturally sensitive, as they are an opportunity for each co-
production to express their unique identities. Ronan McCloskey recalls the process
from a local perspective, as Sesame Tree LAF director:
Once we had settled on the theme or goal of each film, it didn’t take that much further time to
get suitable contributors and locations. This was largely because Laura [Mailey]15 and myself
have a lot of experience making programmes like Children in Need for the BBC, which had
brought us into contact with a lot of schools and groups around Northern Ireland. I think
being local meant that we more or less knew instinctively how and where to get suitable
contributors. For instance I live close to Botanic Primary School and was aware that they
have a very diverse student body. (2009)
Glenda Walsh, an educational consultant with expertise in early childhood education,
care and policy (cf. Walsh, 2007), oversaw the development of the shows goals, to
ensure they were “in line with the government's new educational curriculum, which
includes a component on ‘mutual understanding’” (Richards, 2008). Researchers
from the Queen’s University Centre for Effective Education were also involved in
consultation. Having been present at Sesame Workshop presentations, meetings
and discussions, Ronan McCloskey, as LAF director was “conscious of the Sesame
message throughout the filming and editing” (2009). The ‘Sesame model’ of
pedagogical consultation provided the objectives of each LAF, “and without the
goals the films would have been purposeless”, nevertheless McCloskey
diplomatically recalls, “I think there was a tension between myself and the
educationalists at the outset as I didn’t want people interfering with my films and
they I guess wanted to have their input”. One of the best assets of an editor is
dispassionate objectivity, providing a second set of eyes, and a second chance at
directing without the pressures on location: “Once we got into editing that all
evaporated” (ibid.).
Nevertheless, the tension between education (i.e. the eagerness for moral
didacticism) and the business of making television is something that merits further
15 Sesame Tree, local LAF associate producer
34
discourse. To paraphrase Máire Messenger Davies, there is a tendency to forget,
that children have the need to be entertained as well as to be educated (1989, p.
135; cf. chapter 1. p. 11). Concurrently, David Buckingham et al. highlight, “very few
critics seem prepared to stand up for children’s right to just ‘have a laugh’ –
although, it should be noted, programme-makers certainly have” (2000, p. 17):
Television is a “serious business of entertaining” (Morrow, 2006, p. 21). Decades of
Sesame Workshop research has demonstrated, being educational and being
entertaining are not mutually exclusive. Even the simplest television narratives have
educational value, as interpreting audiovisual grammar of television is not
something we are born with. At the very least, ‘children must have an ability to
understand the underlying logic of events’ (Davies 1989, p.23), and that is a skill
that must be learned. Sesame Tree’s production company, Sixteen South’s
understanding of the ‘Sesame model’ was not to “push messages”, in the words of
executive producer Colin Williams, but to show “the broadest range of life kids have
here” (Richards, 2008). In other words, Sesame Tree was to be inherently but tacitly
multicultural, as was the consensus with those experienced in making programmes.
In one case, some xxxxxxxxxxxx were eager to push didactic messages by making
LAF contributors (the on-screen talent) more apparently xxxxxx I will refrain from
citing examples, but instead defer to the words of Pat Loughrey, former controller
of BBC Northern Ireland, who warned that, a “media shorthand of easy symbols can
be damaging and dangerous” (1996, p. 71). Citing William Crain’s 2003 book,
‘Reclaiming Childhood’, Gail Ringel suggests, “‘[i]nstead of thinking about our own
goals, we should consider the children’s interests and needs’” (2005, p. 6),
… children aged 4–6 are just beginning to develop their own ethnic identity and they have an
interest in how and why people do things. They are able to elaborate on group differences
and, curiously enough, they believe they can change their ethnic identity – sometimes by
changing their clothes. They begin to self identify as a group member, and they have clear
feelings towards different groups. (ibid.)
Ringel is not critical of didacticism per se, but simply wary of children’s capacity for
35
abstract understanding at such early stages in their lives. Research and pre-
production is an indispensible and vital part of the filmmaking process, but it is
important to remain grounded within the limits of achievable goals and practice.
As aforementioned, television is a collaborative process, with many creative
people assigned to specific tasks and specialisms. Experienced personnel
understand their respective roles and avoid the temptation to over-contribute.
‘Direction by committee’ is highly undesirable, and can hinder processes, cause
friction, and negatively impact efficiency. Clear demarcation helps ensure that
external pressures and distractions do not divert overall objectives and direction,
although external pressures can never really be completely evaded:
We did think about how the adult audiences would receive them, probably more so the
Orange Order and the Irish language films. I wanted to keep them simple and visual and I
think these films worked the best. The emphasis was on the children enjoying them and not
the adults thankfully. (McCloskey, 2009)
For the most part the “Orange Order” films were referred to internally as, the
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a mild tone of incredulity, as no one was under any
illusions that the LAF would not be seen as anything but an xxxxxxxxxxxx
Nevertheless, reflecting Stephen Kline’s concerns about the predominance of
fantasy and the effacement of reality in children’s media messages, the emphasis of
the LAFs was on allowing “children [to] see other youngsters in real-life situations”
(Richards, 2008): “The little drummer boy just happens to be at a band parade that
just happens to have a violent history” or certainly ‘just happens to have’
connotations of sectarianism and conflict. “The real story is that the boy learns to
persevere in his drum practice and is rewarded with an ice-cream” (ibid.). From an
American perspective, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and colleagues in xxxxxx
had perhaps forgotten or were more or less oblivious to the ideological implications
of the iconography until reminded by xxxxxxxxxxxx instead, delighted with the
family values of the LAF, as it showed a caring, older brother, helping his younger
brother with his very first uniform, the same uniform that big brother wore when he
36
was little: “It makes me feel good that he wore it”, the little boy ‘says’16 in voice over,
“now I’m going to wear it too!” (Sesame Tree: Episode 5, “Big Hare Day”, 2008)
Much of the filmmaking process involved rendering innocuous, potentially
contentious narratives and iconography. The LAFs “were aimed at pre-school
children and subsequently the images were always going to be the key in terms of
how they were understood by such a young audience” (McCloskey, 2009). In other
words, the films would necessarily contain simple, linear and visual narratives. The
acquisition of those visuals was under severe budget and logistical constraint, with
most LAFs shot “within one short filming period of about eight days” in advance of
the studio segments. The hours that young children are available to be filmed are
also restricted, resulting in ‘run and gun’, or “real in and out filming” in McCloskey’s
words. Another subsequence of such limited filming time would be difficulty in
preplanning. Filming conditions would be very fluid, and thus rigid scripting and
rehearsal would be near impossible. A basic scenario with educational objectives
would have been in mind for each shoot, but much of the voiceover was written
during editing, with a ‘writing to pictures’ process. Editing would be a second
opportunity to construct a story, if the original concept during the shoot was
proving problematic.
In episode eleven, “Turn and Turn About” (Nugent17, 2008), Potto and Hilda
learn about taking turns. The episode features an LAF from xxxxxx Primary, an
integrated school in North Belfast. Eager to help, the children, with the aid of their
teachers, created a playground scenario where a girl of East Asian ethnicity decided
to queue jump instead of waiting her turn to skip rope. All in all, it was a well-filmed
sequence with children very actively involved in acting performances and dialogue,
making piecing together the story very straightforward. However, xxxxxx preview
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subsequently,
the LAF was re-edited into a simplified narrative with voiceover explaining why it is
16 Through necessity, actors performed some (only a few) of the LAF voiceovers. 17 By convention, the producer’s name appears before writers in the reference page. See under Julian-Jones, C.
37
good to take turns and to play together. The act of queue jumping and dialogue
that xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx were cut out, transforming the story
from a misbehaving girl who eventually learns how to play in a group, into a very
ordinary girl’s basic account of all the different type of group games they like to
play at break time, at a harmonious xxxxxx Primary. By ‘ordinary’ I mean a girl that
‘just happens’ to not be Caucasian.
The flagship Sesame Tree episode, in the sense that it is the programme
most publicised as promoting tolerance and understanding, and resolving conflict,
was “The Share Necessities” (Nugent, 2008). The episode was used to “launch the
programme” (Sesame Workshop, 2008) at the Ulster American Society’s ‘Northern
Ireland Film Festival’, and it won the series a CINE ‘Golden Eagle’ in the autumn of
2008 (CINE, 2009). The plotline involves Potto and Hilda splitting up the tree after
an argument, when Potto neglects to share a bunch of grapes. Skirting over the fact
that they were Hilda’s grapes, and Potto ate them without even asking her, the show
provides children with “the opportunity to look at their responsibilities for
themselves and others as well as learning how to respond appropriately in conflict
situations and how to live as a member of the community” (Sesame Workshop,
2009). It features an LAF with the xxxxxx quintuplets from xxxxxx, Conan, Aaron,
Caitlin, Alanna and Aine, sharing their fifth birthday celebrations. “Though we are
similar, we are also very different from each other,” says ‘Conan’ in voice over and
concludes, “it’s good fun sharing things with your brothers and sisters”.
The lesson may be a moot one however, as “[m]ost Protestant and Catholic
children tend to go to separate schools and live in separate neighbourhoods”
(Richards, 2008). Interviewed in Sarah Richards’ Financial Times column, Belfast
Telegraph contributor Eamonn McCann suggests that Sesame Tree “will do some
good but its impact will be minimal... Other factors will continue to create a
separate consciousness” (ibid.), for example, lacklustre support for integrated
schools. The Catholic Church is opposed to integrated education, moreover,
segregation still dominates teacher training: “A Catholic or Protestant can… be
schooled at primary and secondary level, attend training college and get a job as a
38
teacher for life without having left the comfortable company of their own religious
affiliates” (Rolston & McVeigh, 2007, pp. 17-18).
Perhaps as a tacit acknowledgment of the limitations of television as a
teaching medium, Sesame Tree is not described as just a TV series, but “a
multimedia project”, serving “as a valuable resource for children, parents and those
working with children” (Sesame Workshop, 2008). By aligning with the Northern
Ireland curriculum for Primary children, as set out by CEA (the Council for the
Curriculum Examinations and Assessment) (cf. Sesame Workshop, 2007, p. 52) in
tandem with BBC Northern Ireland, the Sesame Workshop tapped into a local
framework of researchers and professionals, including broadcast specialists,
teachers, pedagogists, and multimedia designers. The Sesame Tree series is part of
a ‘media ecology’ (cf. Theall, 2001, pp. 62-63), supported by the BBC NI Schools
website, which incorporates teaching resources, downloadable guides, and ‘Print
and Do’ sheets with cutting out and colouring in activities to name a few. The
website also features an interactive Sesame Tree, where users can access games as
well as a full library of local LAFs and some international LAFs, and featured original
Sesame Street ‘limbo’ sketches, via an animated ‘Big Whizzy Machine’18. BBC NI
outsourced the website creation to Belfast-based company, Front19, with design
headed by company director, Jamie Neely. “BBC NI had a very clear vision for the
games and activities which were to be included in the ‘Sesame Tree’ website”, Front
designer, Eamonn Murphy recalled, “[t]hey had the general idea for what an activity
should be and what the outcome would be and how that relates to a learning
experience for the set age range” (2008). Front worked “in partnership with the
uber-talented [sic] Atto20… to create a complimentary learning resource” (Neely,
2008), one that is advertised at the end of each Sesame Tree episode.
If television is a “window on the world… a vehicle for providing children and
18 http://www.bbc.co.uk/northernireland/schools/sesame/fun_and_games/big_whizzing_machine.shtml 19 http://www.designbyfront.com/ 20 http://blog.helloatto.com/
39
youth with experiences and information otherwise not available to them, their
families or communities” (Graves, 1999, p. 707), with the ability to “break down the
distinctions between here and there, live and mediated, and personal and public”
(Meyrowitz, 1985, p. 308), then that power is likely magnified through the
imagination, ‘suspension of disbelief’ and inexperienced perception of the
preschool child. The multimedia aspect of Sesame Tree potentially places that
magnified power directly into the hands, eyes and ears of the child, granting them
on-demand access to a near instant, interactive ‘window on the world’, like
everyday magic. If they can “believe they can change their ethnic identity” (Ringel,
2005, p. 6), to reiterate Crain, then perhaps that, coupled with the collapsing of the
worldview through the Sesame Tree, would help integrate the “separate
consciousness” (Richards, 2008) that Eamonn McCann mentioned. Of course, access
to a virtual Sesame Tree may allow children to have their very own ‘Big Whizzy
Machine’ to explore, but the site is not quite the undiluted World Wide Web, and
lack of motor skills and inexperience will likely mean the website will be mediated
with the aid of a parent, teacher or guardian as prescribed. Nevertheless, it does
make ‘everyday’ one of the greatest ever, world-changing inventions of our time,
providing children an introduction to the thing that will probably shape their
perceptions of the world to adulthood and throughout the rest of their lives.
40
4. Conclusion
In modern societies, there is a range of institutional provisions for children, all ultimately
originating in what could be seen as a biological evolutionary need for socialization and
protection (survival) and all invoking the responsibility of adult society, whether corporate,
state or personal (parents, community), for the care and moral training of the young.
(Davies, 2004, p. 429; cf. chapter 1. pp. 7-8)
Reflected in our institutions, from the FCC to Ofcom, the BBC to Sesame Workshop,
from the individual nation state to the United Nations, there persists a biologically
motivated, human consensus to do the best for children, to raise them well and
raise them to be ‘good’. But, as James Lull points out, all institutions are social
institutions, and social institutions are precisely “social institutions… in the sense
that they are perpetually constituted by human beings”, and “just as individual lives
and the memberships and agendas of any social group change over time, whatever
ideological structures institutions articulate are social inventions which, like their
authors and interpreters, are not static (Lull, 1996, p. 122). The question of what
media messages are ‘good’ for children is coloured by the “positionality and
situatedness” (Aitkin, 2001, p. 119) of the individual or institution. At the heart of
every discourse throughout this dissertation have been the dilemmas faced by
professionals in contemporary child research, the potential influences of ideological
and political biases and agendas: “Although powerful and well-intended questions,”
writes Stuart Aitkin, “they trace adultist research agendas onto the lives of young
people... we now recognize that our knowledge is perched on precarious and
unsteady ideological foundations” (ibid.). In such a way, media messages, especially
those motivated by moral didacticism often raise questions of cultural imperialism;
of where those messages originated, and for what purpose. Those questions are
further complicated by the fact that the experience of watching television “is highly
mediated not only in terms of technical determinants” but also, “in terms of the
41
complex set of semiotic codes, conventions, formats and production values that it
employs” (Tomlinson, 1999, p. 155). From preproduction, production and
postproduction, through to transmission, reception and interpretation, “[t]here is
clearly massive intervention at all levels” (ibid.). Making television requires
communication and logistics, management and infrastructure working towards a
single endeavour. It demands many skills, the collaboration of many people, and
the keeping and passing of many promises to meet delivery standards and
deadlines, which highlights the commercial nature and influences of the business of
making media messages.
Glocalisation is a two-way process, which further complicates and convolves
discourses of cultural imperialism, in terms of reception and denotation of media
messages. When David Buckingham surveyed a group of six-year-olds about where
Disney films came from, “they opted for France, on the grounds that one of them
had been to Disneyland Paris” (2007, p. 48). And, when first developing Sesame
Street, Joan Ganz Cooney believed “that the Muppets were quintessentially American,
and it turned out that they're the most international characters ever created"
(Goldstein Knowlton & Hawkins, 2006). Glocalisation not only applies to the
adaptation of products to local tastes and requirements, but also in terms of how
they are used. Davies states that “‘racism’ is a function of the interaction between
audience and text, not an inherent which texts either do or do not possess” (1989,
p.106), therefore in terms of polysemy and denotation, moral didacticism and
“education in general” may be in “serious trouble, trying to communicate a body of
knowledge that may be irrelevant to students who may be hostile, fearful, and
unreceptive” (Hesse, 1974, p. 659). The success of those media messages could be
determined by how well they relate socio-politically, as explored in chapter two, or
how congruent those messages are to the target audience, for example in the Uses
and Gratifications model, “racial/ethnic viewers would be expected to want to see
same-race characteristics” (Graves, 1999, p. 713). However, to reprise Giovanni
Bressi, such introverted perspectives may have a limited lifespan, as “[s]elf-centered
localism remains essentially a ‘temptation,’ but in concrete terms it is becoming
42
both less frequent and less possible in today's world” (2003, pp. 7-8; cf. chapter 2,
pp. 25-26). Resistance to Transnationalism, or globalisation may be impossible, but
glocalism may permit some leeway for subversion. Ultimately, culture “can never be
managed by any society’s political-economic power brokers, including its mass
media image makers” (Lull, 1996, p. 114). To a certain extent, we may contribute,
appropriate, adapt and make judgements on the kinds of media messages we make
and receive.
It may be futile to apply the moral judgements of the present to the didactic
standards of the past. Finding universal, altruistic messages is a difficult prospect,
when faced with the vicissitudes of society. That is not to say that discourse in
media messages or exploring ideological aspirations is pointless because the future
will always have different standards, quite the opposite in fact. After all, in the end,
it will be our children who will judge us.
43
Appendix
Below is a pertinent list of UN Articles as examined in ‘Media Globalisation: Consequences for the Rights of Children’ by Cees J. Hamelink (2002, pp. 33-35):
Article 12.1. “States Parties shall assure to the child who is capable of forming his or
her own views the right to express those views freely in all matters affecting
the child…”
Article 13.1. “The child shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall
include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds,
regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art,
or through any other media of the child’s choice.”
Article 14.1. “States Parties shall respect the right of the child to freedom of
thought…”
Article 16.1. “No child shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with
his or her privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on
his or her honour and reputation.”
Article 16.2. “The child has the right to protection of the law against such
interference or attacks.”
Article 17. “States parties recognize the important function performed by the mass
media and shall ensure that he child has access to information and material
from a diversity of national and international sources, especially those aimed
at the promotion of his of her social, spiritual and moral well-being and
physical and mental health. To this end, States Parties shall:
(a) Encourage the mass media to disseminate information and material of
social and cultural benefit to the child and in accordance with the spirit
of article 29;
44
(b) Encourage international co-operation in the production, exchange and
dissemination of such information and material from a diversity of
cultural, national and international sources;
(c) Encourage the production and dissemination of children’s books;
(d) Encourage the mass media to have particular regard to the linguistic needs
of the child who belongs to a minority group or who is indigenous;
(e) Encourage the development of appropriate guidelines for the protection of
the child from information and material injurious to his or her well-being,
bearing in mind the provisions of articles 13 and 18.”
Article 29.1. “States parties agree that the education of the child shall be directed
to:
(a) The development of the child’s personality, talents and mental and
physical abilities to their fullest potential;
(b) The development of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms,
and for the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations;
(c) The development of respect for the child’s parents, his or her own cultural
identity, language and values, for the national values of the country in
which the child is living, the country from which he or she may originate
and for civilizations from his or her own;
(d) The preparation of the child for responsible life in a free society, in the
spirit of understanding, peace, tolerance, equality of sexes, and
friendship among all peoples, ethnic, national and religious groups and
persons of indigenous groups.”
45
References
Aboud, F. E. & Doyle, A. B. (2000). Does Talk of Race Foster Prejudice or Tolerance
in Children? In P. K. Smith, & A. D. Pellegrini, Psychology of Education: Major
Themes, Volume 4 (pp. 257-270). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Ahlert, C. & Ariño, M. (2004, December). Beyond broadcasting: the digital future of
public service broadcasting. Prometheus , 22 (4), pp. 393-410.
Aidman, A., Götz, M., Lemish, D., & Moon, H. (2003). The Role of Media in
Children’s Make-believe Worlds: A Cultural Comparison of Germany, Israel,
the USA and South Korea. 16 (1).
Aitkin, S. C. (2001). Global crises in childhood: rights, justice and the unchildlike
child. Area , 33 (2), 119-127.
Aitkin, S. C. (1994). Putting Children in their Place. Washington DC: Association of
American Geographers/Edwards Brothers.
Altman, A. (2009, 22-January). Time: 2-MIN. BIO Middle East Envoy George Mitchell.
Retrieved 2009, 1-September from Time.com:
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1873532,00.html
Anderson, D. R.; Schmitt, K. L. & Woolf, K. D. (2003, June). Viewing the Views:
Viewing Behaviours by Children and Adults During Television Programs and
Commercials. Journal of Communication .
Authers, J. (2009, 10-August). ft.com, "Short View: Credit markets". Retrieved 2009,
13-August from Financial Times Online:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0d12f4fc-85e3-11de-98de-
00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1
Baker, K. (1996). Reporting the Conflict. In M. McLoone (Ed.), Broadcasting in a
Divided Community: Seventy Years of the BBC in Northern Ireland (pp. 118-
126). Belfast: Institute of Irish Studies, The Queen's University of Belfast.
Barbrook, R. (1998, December). The High-Tech Gift Economy. First Monday , 3 (12).
Barnett, C. (2002). More Than Just TV: Educational Broadcasting and Popular Culture
in South Africa. In U. Carlsson, & C. von Feilitzen (Eds.), Children, Young
People and Media Globalisation (Yearbook 2002) (pp. 95-110). Sweden: The
UNESCO International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media.
BBC. (2009, 4-June). BBC Homepage. Retrieved 2009, 4-June from Commissioning:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/commissioning/tv/network/genres/cbbc.shtml
BBC. (2004). Building public value: Renewing the BBC for a digital world . London:
BBC.
BBC News. (2003, 20-May). BBC World News: Sesame Street breaks Iraqi POWs.
Retrieved 2003, 3-September from BBC News Channel:
46
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3042907.stm
BBC Northern Ireland. (2008). BBC Northern Ireland: Schools. Retrieved 2008, April
from Sesame Tree: http://www.bbc.co.uk/northernireland/schools/sesame/
Bearne, E. (2003). Rethinking Literacy: Communication, Representation and Text.
Children and Society , 2, 98-103.
Bickham, D. S. & Vandewater, E. A. (2004). The impact of educational television on
young children’s reading in the context of family stress. Applied
Developmental Psychology , 25, 717–728.
Bloomberg. (2009, 13-August). Bloomberg.com. Retrieved 2009, 13-August from
Bloomberg.com: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=DIS%3AUS
Born, G. & Prosser, T. (2001). Culture and Consumerism: Citizenship, Public Service
Broadcasting and the BBC's Fair Trading Obligations. The Modern Law
Review , 64 (5), 657-687.
Bowcott, O. (2007, 30-March). UK News: Peace dividend feeds Belfast's house price
boom. Retrieved 2009, 2-September from the Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/mar/30/northernireland.northernirelan
d1
Bowdoin College. (2004). Bowdoin: The George J. Mitchell Papers. (B. C. Library,
Editor) Retrieved 2009, 2-September from Bowdoin:
http://library.bowdoin.edu/arch/mitchell/research/bio.htm
Bressi, G. (2003, 22-March). The Impact of Globalization: Opportunities and
Challenges for Glocal Development in Europe, Latin America and The
Caribbean. Global and Local: Confronting the Challenges of Regional
Development in Latin America and the Caribbean . Milan, Western Lombard,
Italy: University of Turin.
Britten, N.; Gibbs, S.; Maxwell, K. & Morgan, M. (2002). Hearing children’s voices:
methodological issues in conducting focus groups. Qualitative Research , 2
(5).
Buckingham, D. (2007). Childhood in the Age of Global Media. Children's
Geographies , 5 (1-2), 43-54.
Buckingham, D. (1997). Dissin' Disney: critical perspectives on children's media
culture. Media, Culture & Society , 19, 285-293.
Buckingham, D. (1996). Moving Images: Understanding Children's Emotional
Responses to Television. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Buckingham, D.; Davies, H. & Kelley, P. (2000). In the worst possible taste: children,
television and cultural value. European Journal of Cultural Studies , 3 (5), 2-
25.
Buckingham, D.; Davies, H. & Kelley, P. (1999). Talking Dirty: Children, Sexual
Knowledge and Television. Childhood , 6 (2), 221-242.
47
Butler, D. (1996). The Trouble with Reporting Northern Ireland. In M. McLoone, & M.
McLoone (Ed.), Broadcasting in a Divided Community: Seventy Years of the
BBC in Northern Ireland. Belfast: The Institute of Irish Studies, The Queen's
University, Belfast.
CAIN. (2009, 1-June). The Civil Rights Campaign - A Chronology of Main Events.
Retrieved 2009, 27-August from CAIN Web Service:
http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/events/crights/chron.htm
Chomsky, N. (1999). Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinians.
London: Pluto Press.
Chomsky, N. (2003). Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance.
New York: Henry Holt and Company, LLC.
Chrisafis, A. (2004, 10-January). Racist war of the loyalist street gangs: Orchestrated
attacks on minorities raise fears of ethnic cleansing. the Guardian .
CINE. (2009). Fall 2008 CINE Golden Eagle Recipients. Retrieved 2009, 9-September
from CINE: Celebrating Excellence in Film, Video and Media Arts:
http://www.cine.org/w-fall-08.php
CNN. (2009, 22-January). CNN: George Mitchell named special envoy for the Middle
East. Retrieved 2009, 1-Sept from CNN Politics:
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/22/obama.mitchell/index.html
Cole, C. F.; Labin, D. B. & del Roc Galarza, M. (2008). Begin with the children: What
research on Sesame Street's international coproductions reveals about using
media to promote a new more peaceful world. International Journal of
Behavioral Development , 32 (4), 359-366.
Connolly, P. (2006, 7-11-April). Constructing and Deconstructing Masculinity in the
Early Years: Mediations of Social Class, ‘Race’ and Ethnicity. Retrieved 2009,
9-September from paulconnolly.net:
http://www.paulconnolly.net/publications/pdf_files/aera_paper_2006.pdf
Cormack, M. J. (1992). Ideology. London: B. T. Batsford Ltd.
Czerniawska, F. & Potter, G. (1998). Business in a Virtual World. London: MacMillan
Business .
Davies, M. M. (2004). Mickey and Mr. Gumpy: The Global and the Universal in
Children's Media. European Journal of Cultural Studies , 7, 425-440.
Davies, M. M. (1989). Television is Good for Your Kids. London: Hilary Shipman.
Davies, M. M. & Thornham, H. (2007). Academic Literature Review: The future of
children's programming. Ofcom. London: Ofcom.
DCMS. (2009, 15-May). About Us: Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS).
Retrieved 2009, 15-May from Department for Culture, Media and Sport
(DCMS) Website:
http://www.culture.gov.uk/about_us/our_priorities_and_targets/default.aspx
48
Deans, J. (2009, 31-March). the Guardian. Retrieved 2009, 31-March from
guardian.co.uk: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/mar/31/bbc-
centre-for-policy-studies
Department of Culture, Media and Sport. (2001). Creative Industries Mapping
Document 2001. London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport.
Diduck, A. (1999). Justice and childhood: reflections on refashioning boundaries
London: Routledge. In M. King (Ed.), Moral Agendas for Children’s Welfare
(pp. 120-137). London: Routledge.
Drotner, K. (2002). Domesticating Disney: On Danish Children’s Reception of a
Global Media Giant. In U. Carlsson & C. von Feilitzen (Eds.), Children, Young
People and Media Globalisation (Yearbook 2002) (pp. 111-124). Sweden: The
UNESCO International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media.
FCC. (2008, 15-November). FCC Homepage. Retrieved 2009, 13-August from FCC
Mass Media Factsheets: Kids TV:
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Factsheets/kidstv.txt
Finch, C. ( 1993). Jim Henson: The Works—The Art, the Magic, the Imagination. New
York: Random House.
Fiske, J. (1988). Television Culture. London: Methuen.
Gardam, T. (2006). What's Good on Television? The Political Quarterly , 46-57.
Gergely, A. (2009, 18-August). International News: Battle for jobs feeds Northern
Ireland xenophobia. Retrieved 2009, 6-September from Reuters:
http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE57I00M20090819
Gladwell, M. (2000). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference.
London: Little, Brown and Company.
Goldstein Knowlton, L. & Hawkins, L. (Directors). (2006). The World According to
Sesame Street [Motion Picture].
Graves, S. B. (1999). Television and Prejudice Reduction: When Does Television as a
Vicarious Experience Make a Difference? Journal of Social Issues , 55 (4),
707-725.
Gunter, B. & Harrison, J. (1997). Violence in Children's Programmes on British
Television. Children & Society , 11, 143-156.
Gunter, B.; Oates, C. & Blades, M. (2005). Advertising to Children on TV: Content,
Impact and Regulation. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hall, S. (1988). Media Power and Class Power. In J. Curran (Ed.), Bending Reality: The
State of Media (p. 242). London: Pluto Press.
Hall, S. (1994). The rediscovery of ‘Ideology’: return to the repressed in media
studies. (M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett, & J. Curran, Eds.) Culture, Society and the
Media .
Hamelink, C. J. (2002). Media Globalisation: Consequences for the Rights of
49
Children. In U. Carlsson, & C. von Feilitzen (Eds.), Children, Young People and
Media Globalisation (Yearbook 2002) (pp. 33-42). Sweden: The UNESCO
International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media.
Havens, T. (2007). Universal Childhood: The Global Trade in Chidren's Television
and Changing Ideals of Childhood. Global Media Journal , 6 (10).
Hesse, R. (1974). Sesame Street for Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences , 5 (4), 654-
663.
Holson, L. M. (2006, 29-June). Media & Advertising: Former P. & G. Chief Named
Disney Chairman. Retrieved 2009, 26-August from The New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/29/business/media/29disney.html?_r=2
&scp=2&sq=Mitchell%20Pepper&st=cse
Inglis, R. (2003). The Window in the Corner: A Half-Century of Children's Television.
London: Peter Owen.
Janssen, S. C. & Valkenburg, P. M. (1999, Spring). What Do Children Value in
Entertainment Programs? A Cross-Cultural Investigation. Journal of
Communication , 3-21.
Katz, E.; Blumler J. G. & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research.
Public Opinion Quarterly , 37, 509-523.
Kline, S. (1993). Out of the Garden: Toys, TV and Children’s Culture in the Age of
Marketing. Toronto: Garamond Press.
Kyle, K. (1996). The Media and Northern Ireland: Some Personal Recollections,
1969-80. In M. McLoone (Ed.), Broadcasting in a Divided Community: Seventy
years of the BBC in Northern Ireland (pp. 105-117). Belfast: The Institute of
Irish Studies, The Queen's University of Belfast.
Le Jeune, M. (2009). To inform, educate and entertain?: British broadcasting in the
twenty-first century. London: Centre for Policy Studies.
Leibert, R. M., & Sprafkin, J. (1988). The Early Window: Effects of Television on
Children and Youth (3rd Edition ed.). (A. P. Goldstein, & L. Krasner, Eds.)
Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Lemish, D. (2002). Between Here and There: Israeli Children Living Cultural
Globalization. In U. Carlsson, & C. von Feilitzen (Eds.), Children, Young
People and Media Globalisation (Yearbook 2002) (pp. 125-134). Sweden: The
UNESCO International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media.
Lennon, J. (Composer). (1971). Happy Xmas (War is Over). [J. Lennon, Harlem
Community Choir, & Y. Ono, Performers] [7" Single]. New York City, New
York, USA: P. Spector, J. Lennon, & Y. Ono.
Loughrey, P. (1996). Broadcasting in a Divided Community: Seventy Years of the
BBC in Northern Ireland. (M. McLoone, Ed.) Belfast, Northern Ireland: The
Institute of Irish Studies, Queens University.
50
Luke, C. (1994). Out of the Garden and Into the Mall. Canadian Journal of
Education , 19 (3).
Lull, J. (1996). Media Communication Culture: A Global Approach. Cambridge: Polity
Press.
McChesney, R. W. (2002). Children, Globalisation, and Media Policy. In U. Carlsson,
& C. von Feilitzen (Eds.), Children, Young People and Media Globalisation
(Yearbook 2002) (pp. 23-32). Sweden: The UNESCO International
Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media.
McCloskey, R. (2009, 10-September). Sesame Tree, Local Live Action Film Director.
(W-L. Tsang, Interviewer) Belfast, Co Antrim.
McDonald, H. (2009, 24-April). Politics Blog: Hey Gordon, whatever happened to
Northern Ireland's peace dividend? Retrieved 2009, 2-September from the
Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2009/apr/24/northern-
ireland-peace-dividend
McDonald, H. (2009, 26-August). the Guardian: Ted Kennedy helped steer Northern
Ireland toward peace. Retrieved 2009, 1-September from the Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/aug/26/edward-kennedy-northern-
ireland
Julian-Jones, C. (Producer), McDonald, I. (Writer), McCarthy, D. (Studio Director), &
McCloskey, R. (LAF Director). (2008). Sesame Tree: Series 1, Episode 5 (Script
106), "Big Hare Day" [TV Series]. Northern Ireland: BBC.
Julian-Jones, C. (Producer), Nugent, I. (Writer), McCarthy, D. (Studio Director) &
McCloskey, R. (LAF Director). (2008). Sesame Tree: Episode 11 (Script 111)
"Turn and Turn About" [TV Series]. Northern Ireland: BBC.
Julian-Jones, C. (Producer), Nugent, I. (Writer), McCarthy, D. (Studio Director) &
McCloskey, R. (LAF Director). (2008). Sesame Tree: Episode 4 (Script 103),
"The Share Necessities" [TV Series]. BBC.
McVeigh, R. (2001). Cherishing the Children of the Nation Unequally: Sectarianism
in Ireland. In P. Clancy, S. Drudy, K. Lynch & L. O'Dowd (Eds.), Irish society:
sociological perspectives (pp. 620-650). Sociological Association of Ireland.
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social
Behaviour. New York: Oxford University Press.
Montgomery, K. C. (2002). Digital Kids: The New On-Line Children’s Consumer
Culture. In U. Carlsson, & C. von Feilitzen (Eds.), Children, Young People and
Media Globalisation (Yearbook 2002) (pp. 189-208). Sweden: The UNESCO
International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media.
Morrow, R. W. (2006). Sesame Street and the Reform of Children's Television.
Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Murphy, E. (2008, 23-April). Designer. (W-L. Tsang, Interviewer) Belfast, Northern
51
Ireland.
NATO Online Library. (2001, 26-November). NATO Online Library. Retrieved 2009,
31-August from NATO Online Library: The Sinews of Peace by Winston S.
Churchill: http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/1946/S460305a_e.htm
Neely, J. (2008, 15-April). Fun with the BBC Sesame Tree. Retrieved 2008, 28-April
from FRONT:
http://www.designbyfront.com/workinprogress/article/fun_with_the_bbc_se
same_tree
News Letter. (2009, 13-January). News Letter. Retrieved 2009, 28-August from News
Letter: Sinn Fein's Gaza stance slammed as 'blinkered':
http://www.newsletter.co.uk/politics/Sinn-Fein39s-Gaza-stance-
slammed.4868061.jp?articlepage=1
Northern Ireland Office. (2006, 16-November). Northern Ireland (St Andrews
Agreement) Bill. London: The Stationary Office.
Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2002). Children, Media and Globalisation: A Research Agenda for
Africa. In U. Carlsson & C. von Feilitzen (Eds.), Children, Young People and
Media Globalisation (Yearbook 2002) (pp. 43-52). Sweden: The UNESCO
International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media.
Ó Brolcháin, C. (2009, 02-January). IndiMedia.ie. Retrieved 2009, 28-August from
IndiMedia.ie: Palestine mural updated in Belfast:
http://www.indymedia.ie/article/90391
Oakley, K. (2004). Not so cool Britannia: The role of the creative industries in
economic development. International Journal of Cultural Studies , 7 (1), 67–
77.
Ofcom. (2008). Market Impact Assessment of the BBC’s Local Video Service. London:
Ofcom.
Pogatchnik, S. (2009, 23-June). Nation and World: Most Romanians intimidated in
Belfast leaving city. Retrieved 2009, 6-September from The Seattle Times:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2009348521_apeunirel
andromanians.html
Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland. (1998). Statement by the Police
Ombudsman for Northern Ireland on her investigation into the
circumstances surrounding the death of Raymond McCort Junior and related
matters. Belfast: NIO (Northern Ireland Office).
Richards, S. (2008, 5-April). FT Home: UK: Muppets on a peace mission. Retrieved
2009, 11-September from Financial Times:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7cffc450-02ab-11dd-9388-
000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1
Ringel, G. (2005, 4-5-June). Designing Exhibits for Kids: What Are We Thinking?
52
Retrieved 2009, 8-September from The J. Paul Getty Trust:
http://www.getty.edu/education/symposium/Ringel.pdf
Rolston, B. (2007). Facing reality: The media, the past and conflict transformation in
Northern Ireland. Crime, Media, Culture , 3 (3), 345-364.
Rolston, B. & McVeigh, R. (2007). From Good Friday to Good Relations: sectarianism,
racism and the Northern Ireland state. Race & Class , 48 (4), 1-23.
Ruddick, S. (2003). The Politics of Aging: Globalization and the Restructuring of
Youth and Childhood. Antipode , 334-362.
Rushkoff, D. (2004, 04-September). Technology, Media, and Popular Culture.
Retrieved 2009, 14-May from Technology, Media, and Popular Culture:
http://rushkoff.com/2005/09/04/commodified-vs-commoditized/
Schiller, N. G. (2005). Transnational social fields and imperialism: Bringing a theory
of power to Transnational Studies. Anthropological Theory , 5 (4), 439-461.
Sesame Workshop. (2008, 11-March). Muppets Arrive In Belfast As Part Of New
Children’s Television Series, Sesame Tree, Debuting On Bbc Northern Ireland
Television This Month. Retrieved 2008, 12-April from Sesame Workshop
hompage:
http://www.sesameworkshop.org/newsandevents/pressrelease/sesame_tree
_debut
Sesame Workshop. (2009, 15-January). Press Room: Sesame Workshop Receives Four
CINE Awards. Retrieved 2009, 14-September from Sesame Workshop:
http://www.sesameworkshop.org/inside/pressroom?p_p_id=PRESS_ROOM&p
_p_lifecycle=0&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&p_p_col_id=column-
5&p_p_col_count=1&_PRESS_ROOM_struts_action=%2Fext%2FpressRoom%2Fv
iew&_PRESS_ROOM_groupId=10174&_PRESS_ROOM_articleId=56578&_PRESS_
ROOM_version=1.0
Sesame Workshop. (2006). Sesame Workshop 2006 Annual Report. New York:
Sesame Workshop.
Sesame Workshop. (2007). Sesame Workshop 2007 Annual Report. New York:
Sesame Workshop.
Sesame Workshop. (2008). Sesame Workshop 2008 Annual Report. New York:
Sesame Workshop.
Sweney, M. (2009, 21-July). Media: Spending on UK children's shows 'down 70%' at
ITV, Channel 4 and Five. Retrieved 2009, 13-August from the Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/21/childrens-television-uk-
produced-spending-ofcom
The Ireland Funds. (2008). History of the Ireland Funds. Retrieved 2009, 1-
September from The Ireland Funds:
http://www.irlfunds.org/who_we_are/history.html
53
The National Archives. (2009, 27-August). The National Archives. Retrieved 2009,
27-August from The National Archives: http://www.archives.gov/
The Sydney Morning Herald. (2009, 12-March). 1, 2, 3 ... Sesame Street jobs go.
Retrieved 2009, 3-August from The Sydney Morning Herald:
http://business.smh.com.au/business/world-business/1-2-3--sesame-street-
jobs-go-20090312-8vhg.html
The Walt Disney Company. (2009). Disney Corporate. Retrieved 2009, 26-August
from Disney Corporate: Board of Directors:
http://corporate.disney.go.com/corporate/bios/george_mitchell.html
Theall, D. F. (2001). The Virtual Marshall McLuhan. Kingston, Ontario, Canada:
McGill-Queen's University Press.
Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
UNESCO. (2002). Children, Young People and Media Globalisation (Yearbook 2002).
In U. Carlsson & C. von Feilitzen (Eds.). Sweden: The UNESCO International
Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media.
University of Ulster. (2002, 7-June). 1 in 3 NI schoolchildren face sectarian threats,
2 in 3 ethnic minority children experience racism. From University of Ulster:
Press Release: http://news.ulster.ac.uk/releases/2002/505.html
USA Today. (2008). TV: How to get to 'Sesame Street' in Afghanistan. Retrieved
2009, 1-September from USA Today:
http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2004-04-30-sesame-street-
afghan_x.htm
von Feilitzen, C. (2002). Children, Young People and Media Globalisation:
Introduction. In U. Carlsson & C. von Feilitzen (Eds.), Children, Young People
and Media Globalisation (Yearbook 2002) (pp. 13-22). Sweden: The UNESCO
International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media.
Wait, J. H., & Welch, A. J. (1982). Visual Complexity and Young Children's Learning
from Television. Human Communication Research , 8 (2), 133-145.
Walker, S. F. (2002). Jung and the Jungians on Myth (Theories of Myth). London:
Routledge.
Walsh, G. (2007). Early Childhood Education & Care: Northern Ireland. In M. M.
Clarke, & T. Waller (Eds.), Early Childhood Education & Care (pp. 51-82).
SAGE Puclications Litd.
Watt, N. (2009, 23-January). Politics Blog: George Mitchell's patient diplomacy
shepherded Northern Ireland to peace. Now for the Middle East ... Retrieved
2009, 2-September from the Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2009/jan/23/george-mitchell-
interview
Welch, F. (2005, 5-April). BBC News. Retrieved 2009, 26-August from BBC News: The
54
'broadcast ban' on Sinn Fein.
Wescott, T. (2002). Globalisation of Children's TV and Strategies of the 'Big Three'.
In U. Carlsson, & C. von Feilitzen (Eds.), Children, Young People and Media
Globalisation (Yearbook 2002) (pp. 69-76). Sweden: The UNESCO
International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media.
Wikiquote. (2009, 4-July). Wikiquote.org. Retrieved 2009, 11-August from Wikiquote:
United States: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/United_States
Williams, C. (2008, 25-April). BBC defends iPlayer against Murdoch Jr's 'anti-
competitive' claims. Retrieved 2008, 26-April from The Register:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/25/murdoch_bbc_iplayer_competitio
n
Younge, G. (2002, 14-October). the Guardian: Sesame sans frontiers. Retrieved
2009, 21-August from the Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/oct/14/usa.northernireland
Zanker, R. (2002). Tracking the Global in the Local: On Children’s Culture in a Small
National Media Market. In U. Carlsson & C. von Feilitzen (Eds.), Children,
Young People and Media Globalisation (Yearbook 2002) (pp. 77-94). Sweden:
The UNESCO International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media.