session 10
DESCRIPTION
Session 10. Arguments for and against Protection. Incentive Distortions and Their Effect. Specificity Rule. If an externality is present, government policy should intervene as directly as possible on the specific source of the externality, to most enhance national economic efficiency. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Session 10
Arguments for and against Protection
Incentive Distortions and Their Effect
Specificity Rule • If an externality is present, government policy should
intervene as directly as possible on the specific source of the externality, to most enhance national economic efficiency.
• If a country has some other objective, government policy should intervene as directly as possible on the specific objective, to minimize the national economic cost of achieving the other objective (that is, to minimize the amount of economic inefficiency created).
• Key: Identify the specific problem clearly, then use a policy to attack the problem directly.
Promoting Domestic Production or Employment (Small Nation)
$30 paid by the government.
Budget for Subsidy
Producer Surplus
Deadweight LossDeadweight Loss
The Infant Industry Argument
Without tariff, produce would produce none
Producer surplus produced in the future
The Dying Industry Argument
It depends on whether area “g” is greater than areas “b+d” (or “b” ).
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Dying Industry
For instance, in the U.S. workers can petition the U.S Department of Labor for this assistance. If the departmentaccept that this group of workers is being harmed byincreased import, workers who lose their job receivean extra 12 – 18 months of unemployment compensation (in addition to 6 months for job search and moving expenses.
The Developing Government (Public Revenue ) Argument
For a developing nation with low living standards, the most serious “domestic distortion” may relate to the government’sinability to provide an adequate supply of public goods.
As argument goes, the developing government states that in poor developing nations the import tariff becomes a crucial source, not of industrial protection but of government revenue.
Other Arguments for Protection :Non-economics Objectives
National PrideThe rule of thumb is using subsidy, not import barrier.
National DefenseImport barrier would help the nation to have or to be ready to produce products that would be important in a future military emergency.
Income RedistributionImport barriers sometimes can redistribute the nation’s income.
The Politics of Protection
When are tariff unlikely ?
When are tariff likely ?