session 14, ter hoeven & verhoeven

14
Sharing is Caring: Corporate social responsibility awareness explaining the relationship of information flow with affective commitment Claartje ter Hoeven, UvA Joost Verhoeven, UvA Amsterdam, 2011

Upload: csrcomm

Post on 14-Jul-2015

157 views

Category:

Business


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Session 14, ter Hoeven & Verhoeven

Sharing is Caring:Corporate social responsibility awareness explaining the

relationship of information flow with affective commitment

Claartje ter Hoeven, UvAJoost Verhoeven, UvA

Amsterdam, 2011

Page 2: Session 14, ter Hoeven & Verhoeven

introduction Mostly, CSR activities are communicated to enhance:

• stakeholder relations (Korschun, Bhattacharya, & Sen, 2009)

• stakeholder perceptions of their organization (Bhattacharya, Korschun, & Sen, 2009; Luo & Bhattacharya, 2006)

It increases:• brand value (Luo & Bhattacharya, 2006)

• buying (Brown, 1998)

• reliable and honest reputation (McWilliams & Siegel, 2001;

Viswesvaran, Deshpande, & Milman, 1998)

2

Page 3: Session 14, ter Hoeven & Verhoeven

Previous studies CSR communication toward internal stakeholders is

scarcely studied (e.g., Bhattacharya, Sen, & Korschun, 2008; Gond et al. 2011)

Giving Commitment: Employee support programs and the

prosocial sensemaking process (Grant, Dutton, & Rosso, 2008)

– Employees interpret personal and company actions and identities as caring

3

Page 4: Session 14, ter Hoeven & Verhoeven

Question & Aim

• Does awareness about CSR activities increase affective commitment of employees?

• We will look at awareness about CSR activities aimed at:– Employees– Customers– Government– Society

(Turker, 2009)

4

Page 5: Session 14, ter Hoeven & Verhoeven

Proposed model

Page 6: Session 14, ter Hoeven & Verhoeven

Data Survey in a Dutch health-care insurance company, very

active (health-related) CSR policies

301 employees (a 25% response rate)

Sample

• 59% female (vs 67% in company population)• 44 years on average (vs 41 in company population)• 31.57 hours weekly

6

Page 7: Session 14, ter Hoeven & Verhoeven

Measures Affective Commitment (Meyer & Allen, 1993): 5 items (α =.89)

CSR to Society (Turker, 2009): 5 items (α = .86)

CSR to Government (Turker, 2009): 2 items (α = .73)

CSR to Customers (Turker, 2009): 3 items (α = .73)

CSR to Employees (Turker, 2009): 4 items (α = .83)

Information Flow (Glaser, Zamanou, & Hacker, 1987): 4 items (α = .83)

All 7-point scales

7

Page 8: Session 14, ter Hoeven & Verhoeven

Analysis

SEM AMOS (Arbuckle, 1997)

Measurement model (Anderson & Gerbing, 1988)

Bootstrapping (Preacher & Hayes, 2008; MacKinnon, Lockwood &

Williams, 2004)

8

Page 9: Session 14, ter Hoeven & Verhoeven

Results

9

Page 10: Session 14, ter Hoeven & Verhoeven

Discussion Positive effect of giving support reaches further than giving

to colleagues (employees and customers).

Social Identity Theory (in-group vs out-group members).

Important to identify aim of CSR activities.

Importance CSR communication.

10

Page 11: Session 14, ter Hoeven & Verhoeven

Limitations and future directionsLimitations

• Self reports• CSR measure• Single case study

Future directions

• Test proposed mechanism• Extend to other outcomes (e.g., other-ratings of outcomes)• Stakeholder involvement

11

Page 12: Session 14, ter Hoeven & Verhoeven

12

Thank you for your attention!

Questions?

[email protected]

[email protected]

Page 13: Session 14, ter Hoeven & Verhoeven

13

Page 14: Session 14, ter Hoeven & Verhoeven

Proposed model

14

CSR Government

CSR Society

CSR Customers

CSR Employees

Information flow Commitment