session 3: international conference "tracking the future"
TRANSCRIPT
International Conference TRACKING THE FUTURE 10 – 11 November 2010
Centro Congressi Fondazione Cariplo Via Gian Domenico Romagnosi, 8, Milan (Italy)
***
NOVEMBER 11th, 2010
Session 3 - Tracking the future: New technological research scenarios for the future agrifood chains
Objective of this session is to explore the role of S&T research in envisioning new technological approaches for improving the food chains that will supply food in the future.
Programme
9:30 Introduction:
Pier Mario Vello, Secretary General of Fondazione Cariplo Demetrio Corno, President of Tecnoalimenti
9:50 Tracking the future
Chairman: Angelo Ferro - Honorary President of Tecnoalimenti
Presentation of the Conference Declaration on “Actions for Future Food Chain Integrity” adopted by the technical sessions of this Conference - Raffaello Prugger, Director of Tecnoalimenti
Topic 1: Research as leverage for evolving the agrifood sector for the benefit of Society
Key speakers: Ciaran Mangan, Direction General Research, European Commission Daniele Rossi, Co-chairman of European Technological Platform ‘Food for Life’ Ethel De Paoli, CEO of Tecnoalimenti Tobin Robinson, Head of Unit Emerging Risks, EFSA
10:45 Coffee Break
Topic 2: Visions of the new technological scenarios for the future food chains
Key speakers: Neil Maiden, Head of Centre for Human-Computer Interaction Design, City University of
London Hannu Korhonen, Head Biomolecule Research, MTT Agrifood Research Finland Miguel Blasco, Subdirector, Asociaciòn de Investigaciòn de la Industria Agroalimentaria Carlo Mango, Director of Scientific Research Area, Fondazione Cariplo Silvio Ferrari, Delegate, Milano EXPO 2015 “Feeding The Planet, Energy For Life”
13:00 Closing remarks
A) Summaries
Welcome
• Angelo Ferro, Honorary President of Tecnoalimenti
TRACEBACK introduces the novel concept of “food chain integrity”. Under this concept the supply chain is seen as a single collaborative unit in which the product quality is interiorized in every supplier- client relation. Which is the next step: to develop a supply chain e-platform tool able to make effectively possible the management of the collaborative supply chain in Europe. TRACEBACK is the best starting point since this project realized a platform system on food chain traceability which could be implemented for this purpose with new research activities. Further, it is necessary to work on the voluntary certification involving industry and in parallel on the legal certification to guarantee in the long term a benefit for the entire economy.
• Demetrio Corno, President of Tecnoalimenti
The agrifood sector is characterised by Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) which can become active elements in the research system if involved in project contexts. The importance to do research and sustain the research of SMEs from the governments and the European Commission becomes a fundamental element to move the economy of the countries and to establish a leverage for competitiveness.
• Pier Mario Vello - Secretary General of Fondazione Cariplo
Fondazione Cariplo is deeply involved in food research. There is modification in the attitude of the industry, now dealing more with freshness, quality and other parameters of integrity. The attention to ecological features is also a recent revolution. The Fondazione is a non profit organisation for arts, culture, environment and scientific research, acting with grants, projects, investments. Italy is in a good position in scientific research in the world, but its weakness is that research is far from the market, with few patents and licences. Fondazione Cariplo tries to stimulate this aspect of research.
• Raffaello Prugger - Director of Tecnoalimenti Introduces the Conference Declaration on “Actions for Future Food Chain Integrity”
The Sessions 1 and 2 of the conference have addressed technological aspects of food chains, focusing on safety and quality, on tools and devices and informatic support. The results must bring to the exploration of new scenarios, and the declaration is the legacy of the work of 28 partners for 4 years in TRACEBACK. The text of the Declaration is read.
Topic 1: Research as leverage for evolving the agrifood sector for the benefit of Society
• Ciaran Mangan - Direction General Research, European Commission
The Direction General Research and Innovation has published the strategy for European research, characterised by sustainability, innovation, digital agenda, resource efficiency, policy for globalisation, new skills. For food research, the challenge is to provide food security in Europe and the world, adapting to the climate change and considering population growth, decline of fish stocks, deforestation, health, wastes, biotechnology. The 2020 strategy will simplify procedures and focus on knowledge transfer and involvement of SMEs. The Declaration might serve as guidance for the Framework Programme 8.
• Silvio Ferrari - representing the European Technological Platform “Food for Life”
Italy has a central role in the European food industry, with many products which are traditional. The strong points are quality, link with the territory, high safety standards, tradition coupled with innovation. The critical areas are lack of innovation, logistics, slow growth in exports, frauds and counterfeiting, reduced distribution world-wide. Innovation should focus on products and processes. The European Technological Platforms offer an occasion for joining research and industry.
Topic 2: Visions of the new technological scenarios for the future food chains
• Neil Maiden - Centre for Human-Computer Interaction Design, City University of London (UK)
The future direction of software support for traceability can refer to the emerging trends of cloud computing, mobile computing, social networks, and support to creativity. Services to consumers and companies can be removed and accessed through internet, also utilizing mobile devices with commercial applications. Social networks create virtual communities which can be used in business perspectives.
• Silvio Ferrari - Delegate, Milano EXPO 2015 “Feeding The Planet, Energy For Life”
The expos have evolved through time, from the era of industrialization, to cultural exchange, and finally nation branding performed by single countries. Italy 2015 will be centered on the territory as excellence, the high quality in tradition. The main focus will be on food, with different topics: science, security, quality, innovation, biodiversity, lifestyles and education, culture, cooperation and development.
• Hannu Korhonen - Head Biomolecule Research, MTT Agrifood Research Finland
Recent crises in the food business have evidenced some critical points to be addressed with traceability, and some of them affect the dairy chain. Animal cloning can become a controversial issue and EFSA has recently issued an opinion. Genetically modified organisms in feed give problems for tracing in milk and products. Organic production cannot be traced with objective parameters. Chemical contaminants and mycotoxins are also connected with climate change. Globalization increases risks, and new risks are emerging in the dairy chain. The concept of integrity is a platform for emerging food safety issues.
• Miguel Blasco - Subdirector, Asociaciòn de Investigaciòn de la Industria Agroalimentaria (Spain)
Traceability is a basic tool, but consumers must be take into account when working on traceability. The new calls for European Commission research programmes present many topics connected with these aspects. The question is if the demands of consumers can be satisfied by traceability. The food business has strategic opportunities, and the European food industry is central; traceability is essential, is an added value, and new tools will be key factors.
• Carlo Mango - Director of Scientific Research Area, Fondazione Cariplo (Italy)
Fondazione Cariplo together with other banking foundations have financed cooperative projects for agrifood in Italy, totaling 27 million Euro. The projects financed until now focus on cereals, fruit and vegetables, vine, apple and pear.
Conclusions
• Ethel De Paoli, CEO of Tecnoalimenti and TRACEBACK Coordinator
The Conference has provided recommendations for future project partners and for policy makers. The investment in agrifood research is an opportunity to maintain. Research must involve public and private sector. Research must be oriented towards formation of young personnel, creation of skills and interdisciplinary expertise.
B) Presentations
Index Speaker Presentation
Introduction
Pier Mario Vello, Fondazione Cariplo
Demetrio Corno, President of Tecnoalimenti
Tracking the future
Topic 1: Research as leverage for evolving the agrifood sector for the benefit of Society
Ciaran Mangan, Direction General Research, European Commission
Silvio Ferrari, representing the European Technological Platform “Food for Life”
Tobin Robinson, Head of Unit Emerging Risks, EFSA
Topic 2: Visions of the new technological scenarios for the future food chains
Neil Maiden, City University of London
Silvio Ferrari, Delegate, Milano EXPO 2015 “Feeding The Planet, Energy For Life”
Hannu Korhonen, MTT Agrifood Research Finland
Miguel Blasco, Asociaciòn de Investigaciòn de la Industria Agroalimentaria
Carlo Mango, Fondazione Cariplo
Closing remarks
Pg. 7
---
Pg. 17
Pg. 24
Pg. 32
Pg. 43
Pg. 48
Pg. 64
Pg. 72
Pg. 80
---
“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”
Pier Mario VelloBrussels, 13 October 2010
2“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
Overview of Fondazione CariploIntervention Priorities & Tools
ACTION PLANS
Arts & Culture
Scientific Research
Social Welfare Environment
Calls forproposals
Projects
Calls for proposals
Projects
Calls for proposals
Projects
Calls for proposals
Projects
Action Plans
are multi-year documents
(medium term) that set
intervention priorities, targets
and expected results
Based on Action Plans, the 4
philanthropic areas prepare and
launch Calls for Proposals and/or
design and run directly their own
Projects
• Fondazione Cariplo acts predominantly as a grant-making foundationi.e. provides grants to non profit organizations that submit their own
projects: the most deserving initiatives are prevailingly selected
through Calls for Proposals
• In the last years the Foundation has been also furthering its own projects, designed and managed directly by the foundation’s staff and
carried out in partnership with non profit organizations and other
institutions or governmental authorities
3“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
GRANTS
Selection, prevailingly through Calls for Proposals, of the most deserving and innovative projects (submitted by non profit organizations
MISSION CONNECTED INVESTMENTSInvestments aligned with the philanthropic programmes, goals and priorities defined by the foundation
PROJECTS
FC’s own Projects are conceived and managed directly by the foundation’s staff and carried out in partnership with non profit organizations and other institutions or governmental authorities
NON PROFIT SECTOR
The Fondazione Cariplo supports the non profit sector through:
4“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
Overview of Fondazione CariploIntervention Priorities & Tools
CALLS FOR PROPOSALS
NON PROFITS
Submit project proposals
(grant requests)
Selects the best projects and awards
grants (50%)
Run projects autonomously
Project accounting
PROJECTS
Designs the project
Selects project partners
Coordinates project implementation
Funds the project
5“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
7%
40%
53%
Money market-Fixed Income tools[diversified, no Forex risk]
Equity tools[diversified, no Forex risk]
Mission Connected Investments
Mission Connected Investments in the new Benchmark
The Foundation has revised its benchmark and Mission Connected Investmentsare now an integrant part:
6“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
5Italo-chinese joint ventures“Mutual fund like” vehicle (lux Sicar)Mandarin Capital Partners
296 million €TOTAL
5Domestic venture capital Italian fund of fundsNext
4,95Italo-mediterranean joint venturesItalian PE fundEuromed
10Social HousingSocial Housing Real Estate fundSocial Housing 1
60Domestic infrastructures Italian infrastructural PE fundF2i
10Public Private PartnershipItalian fund PPP
10Technology TransferItalian fund TTVENTURE
25 Clessidra I25 Clessidra II
Non listed Italian medium-sized companiesItalian PE fundClessidra I / Clessidra II
Investment company PE sector
Italian Private Equity fund of funds
Vehicle
65,6Italian SMEs Futura Invest Spa
75Non listed Italian SMEsFondamenta
Commitment(million €)Investment Focus MCI
MCIs (Equity tools): a few examples
7“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
7“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
Technology Transfer opportunities in Italy
ITALY
Italian R&D budget exceeds 18.2 bln Eu of which nearly 4.8 bln Eu are invested in universities
Source: IPI, ISTAT - 2007
Italy is among top 4 European countries in terms of scientific production weight
Source: European Commission 2007
9.445
5.495
2.644
637
18,231 Mil Eu
Private researchcenters
Universities
Public researchcenters
Non profit institutions
Italy has strong investment opportunities in basic research which can turn into significant technology transfer opportunities
8“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
8“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
TTVenture: a fund for technology transfer
Bank Foundations:
•Cariplo•Cassa di Risparmio di Cuneo•Cassa di Risparmio di Parma
•Cassa di Risparmio di Modena•Cassa di Risparmio di Forlì
•Cassa di Risparmio di Teramo•Cassa di Risparmio de l’Aquila
•Cassa di Risparmio di Ascoli Piceno
Other Investors:
•Milan Chamber of Commerce•State Street Global Advisors
TTVenture is a private managed fund with private institutional investors ...
... focused on four main scientific and technological areas ...
... with a balanced approach within various investment stages.
AGRO-FOOD
CLEAN TECHS
MATERIAL SCIENCE
LIFE SCIENCE
TTVenture
~ 65 mln € subscribed scientific areas with highest growth potential (*)
lower risk than traditional VC funds
(*) source: Technology Foresight Report, IRER, 2002
TT Venture is a privately run and capitalised fund, focused on high growth technological areas and pursuing a balanced risk approach
9“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
9“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
TT Venture: investments in other VC funds
TTV
1
2
3
Spain- Axon
France - Sofimac
Israel - Terraventures
4
South Italy - Vertis
• Shared deal evaluation methods
• Joined investments
• Exchange scientific knowledge
• International network for portfolio
companies (suppliers, customers,
partners)
• Technology scouting in
international centres of
excellence
Small investments in other VC funds offer TTV:
Investing in other international funds is a strategy aimed at sharing knowledge and enhancing TTVenture international network
10“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
10“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
TT Venture: business – university collaboration
• Performs base research
activities in University
• Reaches a preliminary
technological validation in lab
• Seek for industrial applications
of the new technology
Researcher
• Evaluates market potential and
entrepreneur skills
• Finance proof of concept projects
• Acquires all Intellectual Property
generated
• Offers to TTVenture the IP generated
through a spin-out company
• Sells to other companies or funds all
IP not invested by TT venture
TT Seed
• Supports TT Seed in evaluating the
potential of new technologies
• Acquires IP generated with first choice
right
• Creates the new start up and invests in
it in line with fund’s investment
policies
TT Venture
TT Seed is a flexible investment vehicle which bridges research from universities into start up companies to be invested by TTVenture
11“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
PIER MARIO VELLOSecretary [email protected]
FONDAZIONE CARIPLOVia Manin, 2320121 MilanItalyT +39 02 6239.325F +39 02 6239.202
www.fondazionecariplo.it
Thank You
12“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
Prudential Investment Principles
Payout & Assets’ Preservation targets
− grants’ allocation yearly rate: 3% net assets − long term (>10 years) preservation of assets’ real value
M to M valuation
− transparent evaluation of the foundation’s management− conditio sine qua non for assessing sustainability
Sustainability (expected return vs grants, risk vs stabilization fund)
− benchmark: 40% equity / 53% money market-fixed income / 7% MCIs− stabilization fund: 488 million €
Stability of Asset Allocation
− to avoid benchmark mismatch − to avoid the risk of a procyclical investment approach
Socially Responsible Investing
− since 2008 the Foundation has adopted an evaluation system of SRI of its entire assets
13“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
13“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
Technology Transfer opportunities in Italy
Italian technology transfer indexes are still below European average
Source: our analysis on Eurostat e EVCA 2008 data Source: Balderi & Piccaluga 2009
University spin-off companies by year
Distribution of university spin-offs by turnover (Eu x 1000)
Despite the increase in their number, Italian university spin-off companies have weak economic performances
Technology transfer in Italy has significant space for improvement
14“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
14“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
TT Venture: investment sectors & geographic allocation
% of university spin offs by regionSource: Netval 2007
% of TT offices by regionSource: IPI 2005
58.6%
58.1%
55.7%
% of university spin outs by technological areaSource: Netval 2007
TT Venture is located in the most active area for technology transfer and invests in technological areas covered by the
majority of university spin offs
15“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
15“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
TT Venture network
TTVenture has established a significant network with universities, agencies and institutions and is now recognized as
a reference VC fund in the Italian research environment
National and International
Netval – Associazione Italiana UVR ■Alfred E.Mann Foundation ■MIT – Deschpande centre ■Imperial College (London) ■
Isis Innovation (Oxford) ■Aston University (Birmingham) ■
VDI/VDE Gmbh (Berlin) ■Lyon Biopole ■
Universidad de Navarra ■ZSW (Baden Württemberg) ■
University of Maryland ■Universitad Politecnica de Madrid ■
Tuscany
Università di Firenze ■Università di Pisa ■
Scuola Superiore S.Anna ■Foundazione per la Ricerca e l’Innovazione ■
Toscana Life Sciences ■
Lombardy
Università di Milano ■Università Milano Bicocca ■
Politecnico di Milano ■Incubator e Filarete ■
Università dell’Insubria ■San Raffaele Biopark ■
Camera di Commercio di Milano ■Camera di Commercio di Como■
Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori ■
Sicily
Università di Palermo ■Università di Catania ■Incubator e Catania ■
Università di Messina ■
Sardinia
Polaris Science Park ■
Friuli
Università di TriesteUniversità di UdineArea Science ParkMIB School of management
Veneto
Università di PadovaVeneto nanotechVega science park
Emilia Romagna
Università di Modena e Reggio EmiliaUniversità di BolognaUniversità di ParmaAster – Agenzia di Innovazione
RegionaleAssociazione Industriali di Bologna
Puglia
Università del Salento (Lecce)CNR Arti – network regionale UVR
Piedmont
Tecnogranda ■Università Scienze Gastronomiche ■
Politecnico di Torino ■
Abruzzo
Università de L’Aquila ■
Formal presence in TTVenture Scientific Board
Liguria
IIT ■
Marche
Università Politecnicadelle Marche
Lazio
La Sapienza ■
16“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
16“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
TT Venture operative structure
Investment Committee
Fondamenta Board of Directors Scientific Committee
STRATEGIC ADVICE
Management Team
ODORICO CIO
REDI CTO
Bonfanti Bocca Giordano
INVESTMENT SELECTION
FORMAL INVESTMENT APPROVAL
ANALYSIS, INVESTMENT PROPOSALS AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
Campanella Odorico (CIO)
Mango Redi (CTO)
Rossi
Albizzati Chiesa Freda
Team Members
Independent TBH Dini
Fund’s operative structure
17“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
17“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
TT Venture: investment process
Deal Flow
IBF
Universities
Market
Research Centres
Technological
YES
Referees
NOArchive
NOArchive
YES
Due Diligence
LegalNO
Archive
YESYES
ArchiveCo-investors
NO
ArchiveCo-investors
NO
Projects1
First Screening2
Preliminary Assessment3
Investment Committee4
5
Project’s Redefinition6
Negotiation7
Decision8
Closing
Management/ Monitoring
9
Divestment10
Investment process is well structured and uses specific selection criteria in analysis and due diligence
18“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
22 19 16 14 12 18 18 3 9 11 15 17 12 11 13 13 6 11 6
134156
175191 205 217
235253 256 265 276
291308 320 331 344 357 363 374 380
2007 2008 2009-01 2009-02 2009-03 2009-04 2009-05 2009-06 2009-07 2009-08 2009-09 2009-10 2009-11 2009-12 2010-01 2010-02 2010-03 2010-04 2010-05 2010-06 2010-07
monthly cumulated
377
246
99 72 10 1 11 1
deal flow rej. 1st screen
rej. an. analysis due dil. rej. due dil. offer rej. portfolio Std-by
18“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
TT Venture: investment selection
TTVenture selection process is aligned with industry standards
and is based on two key principles:
• Technology and IP platform
• Investment with instalments linked to scientific and development milestones
2.9%
TTVenture records a steady growing deal flow
TTVenture carefully selects a relevant deal flow (@ 31/07/2010)
19“The Role of Philanthropy in supporting Research & Innovation in Europe”, Brussels, October 2010Pier Mario Vello
PIER MARIO VELLOSecretary [email protected]
FONDAZIONE CARIPLOVia Manin, 2320121 MilanItalyT +39 02 6239.325F +39 02 6239.202
www.fondazionecariplo.it
Thank You
STRATEGIES BEHIND FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME 8
Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries, AquacultureDirectorate E: Biotechnologies, Agriculture and Food
Directorate General for Research and Innovation
European Commission
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
• DG RTD now called “DG Research and Innovation” reflecting Europe 2020 objectives and extending the brief of the new Commissioner.
• These changes stem from the Publication of the Europe 2020 communication
EUROPE 2020
Communication from the Commission to the European Council, (3 March 2010):
“Europe 2020 – a European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth”
3 main priorities:• Smart growth: developing an economy based on
knowledge and innovation• Sustainable growth: promoting a more resource
efficient, greener and more competitive economy• Inclusive growth: fostering a high employment
economy delivering social and territorial cohesion
EUROPE 2020
Seven flagship initiatives
1. Innovation Union2. Youth on the move3. A digital agenda for Europe4. Resource efficient Europe5. An industrial policy for a globalisation era6. An agenda for new skills and jobs7. European platform against poverty
Flagship Initiative : "Innovation Union"
Aim: to re-focus R&D and innovation policy on the challenges facing our society, such as climate change, energy and resource efficiency, health and demographic change.
Actions proposed at EU and MS levels such as Launching of 'European Innovation Partnerships'.
There is one Proposed partnership on Agriculture and innovation which covers the bioeconomy :
A DEFINITION OF THE BIOECONOMY
• The bio-economy is that part of the economy that generates growth and jobs from the development, processing and use of biological resources.
• These resources include land- and water-based inputs for use in the food and feed industry, the production of chemicals, biofuels and other products from biological resources using bio-chemically and bio-technologically based processes. It encompasses the improvement of production and processing chains of industrial sectors such as agriculture, forestry, fisheries, food and chemicals.
SCALE OF THE BIOECONOMY
FOOD & FEED TECHNOLOGIES
BIOTECHNOLOGY PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES
BIOCATALYSIS
BIOMASS PROCESSING
Productembedded knowledge
optimized biomass
FOOD
FOOD PRODUCTS
FEED GREEN CHEMICALS
BIOFUELS BIOMATERIALS
KNOWLEDGE EMPLOYMENT
BIOECONOMY
PRODUCTS CHOICE SUSTAINABILITY
AGRICULTUREFISHERIES &
AQUACULTUREFORESTRY
MICROBIAL
PRODUCTIONBIO-WASTE
BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
KNOWLEDGE
PUBLIC GOODS
BIOECONOMY Research Challenges
Providing food security in Europe and the world while adapting to climate change- Population growth to around 9 billion =>
Increase of demand for food by 50%- Retention of fish stocks => 30% fish
population outside safe biological limits
Reducing the environmental impact of agriculture and Fisheries- 9% CO2 emissions in Europe and 14%
globally- Deforestation- Soil quality- Sustainable aquaculture
BIOECONOMY Research Challenges
Making industry “greener”- Replacing petrochemical inputs with renewable biological raw
materials and bio-processes- New markets for farmers and forest owners
Providing healthy food-Sustainable and safe food production chains-Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture While increasing dietary and nutrition standards and
understanding dietary related disease.
Closing the waste loop- reducing and/or creating added value from food production and consumption waste, and its optimisation in biorefinery and new bioprocess development
Retaining the European lead in bio-sciences and technologies
Current Actions within the Framework Programme driving the bioeconomy
The European Research AreaThe Knowledge Triangle:
- Education - Research - InnovationFreedom of movement of knowledge (the “fifth” freedom)
FP7 Theme 2: ~2 billion EUR for DIRECT COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH
Networking mechanisms: ERA-nets, SCAR, KBBE-NET
New Joint Programme Initiatives (JPI): ( Agriculture, Food security and Climate change; Food and health)
9 ETPs: Farm Livestock, Fish, Plants, Food, Biofuels, …
International cooperation initiatives: SICAs, Dedicated Partnerships
Addressing Relevant policies
• EU2020 strategy
• New Commissioner’s main priorities(Finalisation of ERA; Simplification of the FP; Focus on innovation and knowledge transfer, Increase the involvement of SMEs in research projects)
• CAP, health check of CAP, Organic Farming Action Plan; Forestry Action Plan
• The Maritime policy e.g. Communication on A European Strategy for Marine and Maritime Research; Aquaculture Strategy
• Public health e.g. "A strategy for Europe on nutrition, overweight and obesity related health issues"; Food safety legislation, health claims and food labelling
Addressing Relevant policies
• Energy policy e.g. Strategic Energy Technology Plan
• Environment policy e.g. Green paper on adaptation to climate change; ETAP; Water Initiative; Industrial Emissions Directive; EU Biodiversity Strategy
• Industrial competitiveness e.g. Mid-term review of the EU Biotechnology Strategy; Lead Market in Bio-based products
• Community Animal Health Policy and Animal Welfare Plan
• Development policy e.g. Renewed Sustainable Development Strategy; EU-Africa Strategic Partnership
• Recovery plan
A Way Forward
• Building a European Bio-economy is now an intrinsic part of the Europe 2020 strategy
• Bio-economy should become a priority in EU Member States
⇒ Building wide political support⇒ Mobilising all stakeholders and the civil society⇒ Creating an “Innovation Union” (Innovation Partnerships)⇒ Linking education, research and innovation in the Bio-
economy⇒ Building stronger links to CAP, CFP, Climate change, Public
Health, Industrial competitiveness, etc.⇒ Make innovation a concern for all government departments
not just research policy
THE END OF FP7
•• CALL FP7CALL FP7--KBBEKBBE--2011 Closing date 2011 Closing date January 2011January 2011
•• CALL FP7CALL FP7--KBBEKBBE--2012 Closing date 2012 Closing date January 2012January 2012
•• CALL FP7CALL FP7--KBBEKBBE--2013 Closing date 2013 Closing date January 2013January 2013
La Ricerca dellLa Ricerca dell’’Industria Industria Alimentare oltre il 2020Alimentare oltre il 2020
SILVIO FERRARI
Consigliere incaricato di Federalimentare
per la Ricerca, gli Studi,la Ricerca EU e l’Expo 2015
Milano, 11 novembre 2010
LL’’INDUSTRIA ALIMENTARE IN EUROPA INDUSTRIA ALIMENTARE IN EUROPA (DATI 2009)(DATI 2009)
Source CIAA data and trends 2009
TURNOVER €965 billion (+3.2% compared to 2007)LARGEST MANUFACTURING SECTOR in the EU (12.9%)
EMPLOYMENT 4.4 million people (+0.8% compared to 2007)LEADING EMPLOYER in the EU (13.5%)
NUMBER OF COMPANIES 310,000FRAGMENTED INDUSTRY of which over 99% are SMEs (48.7%of F&D turnover and 63.0% of employment in the sector).
LL’’INDUSTRIA ALIMENTARE IN ITALIA (DATI 2010)INDUSTRIA ALIMENTARE IN ITALIA (DATI 2010)
Fonte: Dati e stime Federalimentare per il 2010
FATTURATO 120 Mld € di fatturato
Secondo posto dopo il settoremetalmeccanico (13%).
N. ADDETTI 400.000
N. AZIENDE 32.300 DI CUI
6.400 imprese > 9 dipendenti.
2.600 imprese > 19 dipendenti.
EXPORT 20 Mld di €L’80% dell’export alimentareitaliano è rappresentato daprodotti industriali di marca.
IMPORT 16 Mld €
ATTIVO COMMERCIALE 4 Mld €
LE PRINCIPALI VOCI LE PRINCIPALI VOCI DIDI SPESA 2010SPESA 2010
Alimentari e bevande17%
Abbigliamento e calzature
9%
Abitazione (Acqua,
Riparaz. En. Elett. e
combust.)10%
Mobili, articoli e servizi per la
casa 9%
Spese per la salute8%
Trasporti15%
Comunicazioni3%
Istruzione, ricreazione spettacolo e cultura
7%
Servizi ricettivi e ristorazione
11%
Altri beni e servizi11%
Fonte: elaborazione dati Federalimentare
EXPORT 2009 EXPORT 2009 ‐‐ LA COMPOSIZIONE LA COMPOSIZIONE
Fonte: Dati e stime Federalimentare
Riso3%
Molitorio1% Pasta
10%
Dolciario12%
Zucchero1%
Carni preparat5%
Ittico1%
Trasfor. Ortaggi9%
Trasfor. Frutta4%Lattiero‐Caseario
8%
Oli e Grassi7%
Alim. Animale1%
Vini, Mosti, Aceto20%
Acquaviti e Liquori3%
Acque Minerali e gassose
2%
Caffè4%
Altre Ind. Alimentari
8%
INDUSTRIA ALIMENTARE ITALIANA:INDUSTRIA ALIMENTARE ITALIANA:FATTURATO PER TIPOLOGIA DI PRODOTTOFATTURATO PER TIPOLOGIA DI PRODOTTO
Tradizionale classico66%
Biologico0,7%
Tradizionale evoluto16%
Nuovi prodotti8%
Denominazioni protette9,3%
Fonte: Elaborazioni e stime Federalimentare
TRADIZIONALE CLASSICO 79,2 MLD € 66%
TRADIZIONALE EVOLUTO 19,2 MLD € 16%
DENOMINAZIONI PROTETTE 11,16 MLD € 9,3% (DI CUI 3 MLD € DI EXPORT)
NUOVI PRODOTTI 9,6 MLD € 8%
BIOLOGICO O.84 MLD € 0,7%
TOTALE 120 MLD € 100% (DI CUI 20 MLD € DI EXPORT)
LL’’INDUSTRIA ALIMENTARE ITALIANA: INDUSTRIA ALIMENTARE ITALIANA: PUNTI PUNTI DIDI FORZAFORZA
ampia offerta di prodotti di alta qualità; prodotti DOP al “top” dei mercati internazionali;
legami col territorio e col patrimonio culturale del Paese;
alti standard di sicurezza;
capacità di unire tradizione e innovazione costante di processo e di prodotto;
settore con doti anticicliche e calmieratrici.
LL’’INDUSTRIA ALIMENTARE ITALIANA: CRITICITAINDUSTRIA ALIMENTARE ITALIANA: CRITICITA’’
settore polverizzato;innovazione insufficiente (soprattutto tra le PMI);logistica che risente sfavorevolmente degli alti costi (servizi,energia, rete infrastrutturale);
crescita lenta dell’export vs Paesi concorrenti europei come la Germania e la Francia;contraffazione e imitazione, soprattutto verso i mercati ricchi ed esigenti - stimati 52 Mld €;assenza di catene distributive italiane nel mondo.
ATTRAVERSOATTRAVERSOLA CREAZIONE DI VALORE, IL SERVIZIOLA CREAZIONE DI VALORE, IL SERVIZIO
LA RICERCA, LA RICERCA, LL’’INNOVAZIONE INNOVAZIONE
IL TRASFERIMENTO IL TRASFERIMENTO DI NUOVE TECNOLOGIE ALLE PMI.DI NUOVE TECNOLOGIE ALLE PMI.
COME AUMENTARE LA COMPETITIVITCOME AUMENTARE LA COMPETITIVITÀÀEE
VINCERE LE SFIDE DELLA GLOBALIZZAZIONEVINCERE LE SFIDE DELLA GLOBALIZZAZIONE��
IMPRESE CHE INNOVANO IMPRESE CHE INNOVANO ‐‐ EUROPAEUROPA
Processmajor
innovation23%
Productmajor
innovation: 31%
Major innovators: 41%
Improvers who did notintroduced major innovations:
44%
Only15%of all
F&D firmsdid not
introduceinnovations
in the last three
years
Both: 13%
Fonte: SSA “SMEs-NET”
Processmajor
innovation20%
Productmajor
innovation: 23%
Major innovators: 34%
Improvers who did notintroduced major innovations:
42%
24%of all
F&D firmsdid not
introduceinnovations
in the last three
years
Both: 12%
IMPRESE CHE INNOVANO IMPRESE CHE INNOVANO ‐‐ ITALIAITALIA
Fonte: SSA “SMEs-NET”
fonda e coordina il Gruppo Europeo di Interesse Economico “SPES GEIE”(12 Federazioni europee del food & drink) per participare ai Programmi QuadroEU (aprile 2003).
ha partecipato ai progetti EU: SMEs-NET, TRUEFOOD, ENFFI, ICARE, TRACEBACK, BASEFOOD, FRISBEE, AFTER, NUAGE. TRUEFOOD è il maggiorefra quelli coordinati da SPES (21 mln €, di cui 15,5 finanziati UE).
rappresenta l'Industria alimentare italiana nel Comitato Ricerca e Innovazione di Confindustria (giugno 2004).
è Chairman del Research Group della CIAA (marzo 2005).
partecipa alla costituzione della Piattaforma tecnologica europea “Food for Life”, ne è Vice-chairman (D. Rossi) e membro del Board (luglio 2005).
costituisce con l'INRAN, UNIBO ed ENEA la Piattaforma tecnologica nazionale“Italian Food for Life” che coordina (Chair: D. Rossi) (luglio 2006) .
partecipa alla piattaforma tecnologica nazionale “IT – Plants for the Future”(Chair: S. Ferrari).
è tra i promotori del programma “Industria 2015 – Nuove Tecnologie per ilMade in Italy “ del MISE. Partecipa ai progetti @BILITA e MIA Over-50.
RICERCA e INNOVAZIONE: IL NOSTRO IMPEGNORICERCA e INNOVAZIONE: IL NOSTRO IMPEGNO
AREE PRIORITARIE IN CUI SI STRUTTURA LAAREE PRIORITARIE IN CUI SI STRUTTURA LAPIATTAFORMA ITALIAN FOOD FOR LIFEPIATTAFORMA ITALIAN FOOD FOR LIFE
1. Rendere la scelta sana la piùsemplice.
2. Ideare e promuovere una dieta salutare.
3. Offrire al consumatore cibi di qualità, adatti alle piùsvariate occasioni di consumo, con un alto valore aggiunto in termini di confezionamento e di servizio.
4. Garantire ai consumatori alimenti sicuri di cui possano fidarsi.
5. Raggiungere la sostenibilitàdella produzione alimentare.
6. Gestione della filiera alimentare.
7. Comunicazione, formazione e trasferimento tecnologico.
-
FoodQuality &
Manu-facturing
Food &Health
Food Safety
SustainableFood Production
Food &Consumer
Communication,Training &
Technology Transfer
Food Chain Management
Fonte: “Food for Life” SRA 2007-2020
CHAIRMANSHIP CO- CHAIRMANSHIP
OLTRE 300 STAKEHOLDERS: PRODUZIONE PRIMARIA, INDUSTRIA (PMI), DISTRIBUZIONE, CONSUMATORI
COMMUNICATION TRAINING TECHNOLOGY
TRANSFER
E. DE PAOLI (TECNOALIMENTI),M. CONTEL (NEXEN)S. TOFFANIN (EURIS)
G. SCOLA (AGRICONSULTING)
KEY – THRUST 1 IMPROVING HEALTH WELLBEING & LONGEVITY
INRAN (C. CANNELLA) – GRANAROLO (A. BORSARI)– UNILEVER (R. NARDI)
ISTI
TUZI
ON
I M
IRR
OR
GR
OU
P
KEY – THRUST 3 SUSTAINABLE &
ETHICAL PRODUCTION
ENEA (M. IANNETTA) SAPLO PERONI (G. ZASIO)
INALCA CREMONINI (G. SORLINI)
KEY – THRUST 2CONSUMER
TRUST IN THE FOOD CHAIN
UNIBO (R. FANFANI)BARILLA (R. CIATI)
M. FONTANA (FERRERO)
DANIELE ROSSI: FEDERALIMENTAREACHILLE FRANCHINI: UNIBOCARLO CANNELLA: INRANLUIGI ROSSI: ENEA
GRAZIE PER L'ATTENZIONE!
The use of trade/traceability data in riskassessment and the identification of
emerging risks
Tobin Robinson, Head of Unit, Emerging Risks
What EFSA does
EFSA is the keystone of EU risk assessmentregarding food and feed safety. In close co-operation with national authorities and in open consultation with its stakeholders, EFSA provides independent scientific advice and clear communication on existing and emerging risks
Mission
What EFSA does
1. Provide scientific advice, opinions, information, and technical support for Community legislation and policies
2. Collect and analyse data to allow characterisation and monitoring of risks
3. Promote and coordinate development of uniform risk assessment methodologies
4. Communicate risks related to all aspects of EFSA’smandate
EFSA’s tasks
What EFSA does
• Be responsible for food safety legislation• Take charge of food safety/quality controls,
labelling or other such issues• Act as a substitute for national authorities
What EFSA cannot do
Risk assesment
General Opinions
Urgent requests
Identification of emerging risks
HowHow doesdoes traceabilitytraceability impact on impact on EFSAEFSA’’ss workwork ??
Trade data is important for :
Exposure scenarios;- (see urgent requests …..)-e.g. Data on intra-EU trade is being used in an opinion on public health risks due to Salmonella in meat products.
-Need to link products to primary production methods (but also slaughter and subsequent processing)-Data is vital for realistic modelling (flow of live animals, carcasses, meat products ……)
Assessing risk of spread of plant and animal diseases;- e.g. Common and durum wheat, EU production, cultivated area and imports- e.g. Oyster trade and production- e.g. Live fish and products
GeneralGeneral OpinionsOpinions
IllegalIllegal//unregisteredunregistered tradetrade
Chaber et al., (2010) Conservation Letters, p 1-7
The scale of illegal meat importation from Africa to Europe via Paris
Sanitary inspections at Roissy-Charles de Gaulle airport, Paris, between 3 and 20 June 2008. 29 Air France flights from Central and West Africa were checked. Passengers carrying iceboxes were targeted for inspection, and other passengers chosen at random.
Most bushmeat was recovered fresh, having been slaughtered shortly before boarding. About half the meat had sanitary certificates, certifying that the meat was fit for human consumption (but not legally valid).
134 passengers were inspected, of which almost half were carrying meat or fish (note that part of the inspection was targeted).
446 kg of fish were found, 131 kg of livestock and 188 kg of bushmeat. For bushmeat, average individual consignments were over 20 kg.
The authors estimate that for the Air France routes checked, 63.2 tonnes of meat and fish were imported per week, of which 5.25 tonnes was bushmeat. (3287 and 273 tonnes per year, repectively, if these figures are representative).
Dioxins in pig meat
Melmaine in milk
Urgent Urgent requestsrequests
Background
During routine monitoring of Irish pork, elevated levels of PCBs were found.
(Later traced to electronic transformer oil contaminating pig feed)
Ireland’s farms produce over 3 million pigs per annum, almost 50% of which are consumed within the Republic. The remainder is exported, heavily to the neighboring territories of Northern Ireland and Britain, but also throughout Europe and Asia. In 2007, Ireland exported 113,000 tons of pig meat and over 500,000 live pigs were also shipped to the UK for slaughter and processing in that country.
DioxinsDioxins in in IrishIrish porkpork (2008)(2008)
ESFA received a request for a rapid assessment (2 days) ofthe public health risks due to the presence of dioxins in pork from Ireland.
DioxinsDioxins in in IrishIrish porkpork
Exposure scenarios were the main challenge;
Export volumes for pork from Ireland to other EU Member states was used in combination with production figures for each MS to arrive at a percentage of potentially contaminted pork in different EU countries.
Consumption data on pork was used, and an assumption that 50% of meat/offal consumed is pork was employed.
PCBs accumulate in fat, an assumption that 20% of porkmeat/products is fat was used.
For the risk manager, the traceability situation was rather more complex ………….
DioxinsDioxins in in IrishIrish porkpork
Conclusion:
To cut a long and complex story short;
No concern for « average » consumers
For consumers, consuming large quantities of Irish pig fat duringthe period of risk (90 days) their protection would be reduced but not neccessarily leading to adverse health effects.
DioxinsDioxins in in IrishIrish porkpork
Background
Melamine is a raw material used in the production of some plastic products (and many other items) – its use as a monomer and additive in plastics in contact with food is approved in the EU.
(waste) Melamine was fraudulently added to milk in China, in order to increase its value (gives an exaggerated apparent protein content) or ensure it complied to quality standards.
In 2008, high levels of melamine in infant milk and other milk products led to severe health effects in Chinese children (>290 000 people affected, mostly under 2 years old, at least 6 babiesdied, potential long-term complications).
MelamineMelamine in in milkmilk productsproducts fromfromChina (2008)China (2008)
EFSA received a request from the EC for a rapid assesment (5 days) of the public health risks due to melamine in infant milk and other milk products from China.
•Import into the EU of milk and milk products originating from China is prohibited under EU legislation
•Composite food products imported into the EU could contain milk or milk products. In particular, biscuits and confectionary were identified as being potentially of concern.
MelamineMelamine in in milkmilk productsproducts fromfromChina (2008)China (2008)
Exposure limits already established (due to potential for migration from food contact materials) (TDI of 0.5mg/kg body weight).
The main challenge was developing realistic exposure scenarios:
•Typical (and high) consumption of products (biscuits, toffee, chocolate)•Typical (and high) milk content of such products•Typical (and maximal) melamine contamination of dried milk
Detailed trade/traceability data would have assisted in more accuracy
MelamineMelamine in in milkmilk productsproducts fromfromChina (2008)China (2008)
Conclusion:
Estimated exposure (through biscuits and confectionary) not a concern for adults, or for children with an average consumption.
For the worst case scenario (children with high daily consumption, eating products with high content and highly contaminated milk powder), the TDI could be exceeded by three times.
MelamineMelamine in in milkmilk productsproducts fromfromChina (2008)China (2008)
Exposure scenarios rely on accurately reported trade figures
TakeTake home home ……..
Identification of emerging risks
DefinitionDefinition ofof EmergingEmerging RiskRisk
ESFA, 2007. Definition and description of « emerging risks » within the EFSA’s mandate. Statementof the Scientific Committee, 10 July 2007.
Emerging Risk
Overall strategy being developedat EFSA• Relies on three steps:
– Data collection • Soft – media, grey literature• Regulatory – RASFF, trade data, compulsory
monitoring/surveillance• Scientific literature• Expert judgement – Panels, Units, Networks, Stakeholders
– Data analysis, signal detection and filtering– Exchange of information
• Progressive implementation– 2009-10 Food and feed– 2011: Plant Health– 2012: Animal Health
Changes in trade
•New trading partners (countries)Co-risks (plant and animal pests)InexperienceDifferent production practices – new risks
•Increase in trade volumeExposure levelsPossible indicator of new uses/exposure routesIndicator of new production practices (Increased trade due to decreased price, due to ………)
•Trade in new commodities
TradeTrade andand emergingemerging risksrisks
Grazie per la vostra attenzione!
Software Technology TrendsFuture Consequences for Food Chains
Professor Neil MaidenCity University London
@NeilMaiden
Software-related innovationsWhere TRACEBACK is
– A service-oriented solution– Emerging need for service-level
agreementsImportant future directions – a
personal view– Cloud computing– Mobile computing– Social computing– Supporting creativity and
innovation in food chains
TRACEBACK – an Adaptable SolutionSoftware services
– For tracing and tracking, quality analysis, alerting..
– Assemble services within reference architecture
– Limited consumer focusHow adaptation happens
– Monitor qualities of invoked services
– Invoke and re-bind different services to maintain delivery
Well-known barrier to scale– Integrating services is hard
Service-Level Agreements (SLAs)Negotiated agreement between two parties
– Service consumer and provider– Defines expectations about
services, responsibilities, priorities, guarantees, and warranties
Monitoring software services– Specifies required service
qualities (performance, reliability etc) over periods of time
But agreements along chains?– Reinforces organizational barriers– Less flexible food chains
SLA
SLA
SLA
Cloud Computing
Whole food chain cloud
Now mainstream– Offer software-as-a-service– Large server farms– Advantages include
cheaper, quicker, up-to-date, inter-operable
Cloud services– Cloud services from email
to calculating payroll taxes to complex 3-D modeling
Cloud-based food tracing– Single players in a cloud?– Whole chains in a cloud?
Directions in Mobile ComputingApp stores
– Apps to download from commercial sites for iPhone, iPad and Android devices
– 7 billion downloads by Oct 10Consumer-led food apps
– Motivated single developers– HarvestMark app provides
food information to consumersEnterprise apps
– Increasingly available on mobile devices
– Offer powerful business applications to mobile workers
Social ComputingEmergence of new technologies
– Enabling virtual communitiesConvergence with enterprise
– Use social media internally as organizational processes
– Exploit social media externally for markets and outreach
Opportunities for food chains– Twitter as very simple tool to
enact workflows– Consumer-led blogging about
food provenance, inside or outside existing traceability structures
Creative and Innovative TracingKey for economic success
– Organizations with more creative people
– More innovative workforcesOpportunities for food traceability
– Information discovery by players in a food chain, e.g. new patterns of traced information, consumer-led product innovation
– Support for collaborative creative problem solving up-and-down food chains
Future Traceability DirectionsTechnological backbone in place
– Expect rapid growth in different directions
Food traceability
technologies
Uno sguardo sui nuovi scenari tecnologici per il futuro della filiera
agroalimentare e lo sviluppo EXPO 2015
Silvio FerrariCoordinatore
GdL Expo 2015 Confindustria “Nutrizione”
La crescita della popolazione mondiale continua
0.0
3.0
6.0
9.0
12.0
1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050
Tota
l pop
ulat
ion
(bill
ions
)
00.1
0.20.30.4
0.50.60.7
0.80.9
Ann
ual i
ncre
men
ts (b
illio
ns)
BRUTAL FACTS: nel mondo
• La produzione di derrate alimentari non cresce più del 2% annuo
La popolazione mondiale aumenta ad un ritmo del 3% annuo
Stime ONU e FAO
Status Quo : siamo 6,8 miliardi
Nel 2025 saremo 8 miliardi e la produzione
- di cereali deve aumentare del 41%- di carne deve aumentare del 63%- di tuberi deve aumentare del 40%
• Nel mondo ci sono:• 1 miliardo di persone denutrite• 2 miliardi di persone con deficienze nutritive
Status Quo 2010
2025
6,8
Scorte mondiali di cereali
NEL 2000 BASTAVANO AD
ALIMENTARE L’UMANITÀ PER
115 GIORNI
OGGI BASTANO PER
72 GIORNI
Scorte mondiali di cereali
Maggiore efficienza Maggiore efficienza produttiva per Haproduttiva per Ha
• Gestione e utilizzo del territorio
• Emissione di Gas ad Effetto Serra
• Utilizzo e disponibilità dell’acqua
• Salute e benessere animale
Sostenibilità:
Piattaforme Tecnologiche
• Le Piattaforme Tecnologiche (Europee e nazionali) sono partnership pubblico-private che coinvolgono industrie, istituzioni di ricerca e autorità di regolamentazione
• Indirizzate dall’industria (“industry-driven”)• Focalizzate sulle aree tematiche prioritarie del FP7
(significativo impatto economico e alta rilevanza sociale)• Strumento di lobbying istituzionalizzato per coinvolgere le
industrie nella definizione dei programmi di R&D a livello nazionale ed Europeo
Piattaforme KBBE
Plants for the Future si pone a monte della altre PT della KBBE con l’obiettivo di innovare la produzione primaria di materie prime di origine vegetale.
Per “bio-economy” si intendono le industrie e i settori economici (es. agricoltura, industria alimentare, selvicoltura, agroindustria, ecc.), che producono, gestiscono e utilizzano le risorse biologiche, i relativi servizi, nonche’ le industrie di trasformazione e di consumo.
In Europa queste industrie hanno un indotto annuale di 1.5 miliardi di Euro.
EXPO 2015, MilanFeeding the Planet,
Energy for Life
Expo 2015 sarà uno straordinario eventouniversale che mostrerà la tradizione, la
creatività e l’innovazione nell’alimentazione�
Origini dei World Expo
• 1844: 1° Esposizione Industriale Francese, Parigi• 1851: 1° International Exhibition, Londra
Evoluzione World Expotre direttive principali:
La torre Eiffel , Expo 1889
IndustrializzazioneIndustrializzazione(1851(1851--1938)1938)Expo come esposizioni universali delle invenzioni, che celebrano i successi dell’umanità e contemplano il progresso
ScambioScambio culturaleculturale(1939(1939--1991)1991)Expo basati su un temaspecifico di significatoculturaleOrientamento al futuro
Space Needle , Seattle 1962.
““Nation BrandingNation Branding””(1991- ad oggi)I paesi usano l’Expoper migliorare la loroimmagine attraversoi padiglioni, pormuovendo ilterritorio
World Expo – Shanghai1° maggio – 31 ottobre 2010
Insieme alle Olimpiadi di Pechino, city brandingElemento innovativo, tema molto specifico, momentodi riflessione per il futuro (Trattato di Shanghai- tipoProtocollo di Kyoto per la qualità della vita nelle città)
Perché l’Italia?
• L’EXPO volano per l’economia del territorio e rappresentare al meglio le eccellenze nel settore dell’alimentazione italiana.
• L’alta qualità della tradizione alimentare italiana è nota e apprezzata in tutto il mondo, frutto di secoli di affinamento delle competenze di tutti gli operatori della filiera, ed in particolare delle scelte dell’Industria alimentare.
• L’EXPO rappresenta un’opportunità di promozione di tutto il comparto dell’Industria alimentare italiana e di valorizzazione di tutte le eccellenze imprenditoriali, produttive e scientifiche situate sul territorio italiano nel comparto alimentare.
I numeri significativi di Expo Milano
• Periodo: 1 maggio – 31 ottobre 2015• 20 Milioni di ingressi nei 6 mesi di Esposizione
– (14 Milioni dall’Italia, 4 Milioni dai Paesi Europei e 2 Milioni dal resto del mondo) • Investimenti infrastrutturali sul territorio per oltre € 14 Miliardi:
– Opere infrastrutturali dirette per € 3,2 Miliardi– Opere infrastrutturali già previste per € 10,2 Miliardi
• 1,7 million m² in area (RHO Pero) • Ricadute economiche per oltre € 3,7 Miliardi • 70.000 nuovi posti di lavoro• 7.000 eventi• Coinvolgimento di oltre 36.000 volontari • 5 anni di progetti nazionali e internazionali nella filiera dell’alimentazione, della sostenibilità e dell’uso razionale dell’energia
Expo 2015“Feeding the Planet, Energy for Life”
• L’EXPO - volano per l’economia del territorio per rappresentare al meglio le eccellenze nel settore dell’alimentazione italiana.
• L’alta qualità della tradizione alimentare italiana, frutto di secoli di affinamento delle competenze di tutti gli operatori della filiera, e delle scelte dell’Industria alimentare, è nota e apprezzata in tutto il mondo.
• L’EXPO opportunità di promozione di tutto il comparto dell’Industria alimentare italiana e di valorizzazione di tutte le eccellenze italiane nel comparto alimentare.
Fonte: Candidatura Expo 2015
Il Tema: Nutrire il Pianeta, Energia per la Vita
I 7 Sottotemi
Progetto Speciale Expo 2015 di Confindustria- Gruppi di Lavoro
GdL “NUTRIZIONE” Confindustria: composizione e mission
Coordinato dal Dr. SILVIO FERRARI (FEDERALIMENTARE)
COMPOSIZIONE
Membri del Comitato Tecnico “PROGETTO SPECIALE EXPO 2015”;
Esperti di Associazioni di categoria e territoriali;
Aziende industriali.
MISSION
Valorizzare le ECCELLENZE ITALIANE, anche e livello
TERRITORIALE, sul piano della QUALITÀ, della SICUREZZA
ALIMENTARE, delle INNOVAZIONI nella filiera e nella ricerca in campo
AGRO-ALIMENTARE, delle BIODIVERSITÀ e della SOSTENIBILITÀ
Sviluppo del posizionamento di eccellenza dell’industria agro-alimentare Italiana
Criteri di identificazione delle eccellenze
EXPO 2015: un’OPPORTUNITÀ unica per l’INDUSTRIA ALIMENTARE ITALIANA
Il SETTORE AGROALIMENTARE ITALIANO rappresenta una vera ECCELLENZA che primeggia sul piano della QUALITÀ, della
SICUREZZA ALIMENTARE, dell’INNOVAZIONE TECNOLOGICAd’avanguardia, della SOSTENIBILITÀ, della BIODIVERSITÀ e del
RISPETTO DELLA TRADIZIONE.
1 TEMAMODELLO ALIMENTARE ITALIANO
TURISMO TURISMO CULTURALE, CULTURALE,
ATTRATTIVITATTRATTIVITÀÀ E E RICETTIVITRICETTIVITÀÀ
SICUREZZASICUREZZAALIMENTAREALIMENTARE
RISPETTO RISPETTO DELLA DELLA
TRADIZIONETRADIZIONE
INNOVAZIONE TECNOLOGICA
D’AVANGUARDIA
COMPETITIVITÀE NUOVI MERCATI
TRASFERIMENTO DI KNOW HOW / TECNOLOGIE
BEST PRACTICES
DIETA DIETA EQUILIBRATAEQUILIBRATA
SVILUPPO EQUILIBRATO DEI SISTEMI SVILUPPO EQUILIBRATO DEI SISTEMI AGROINDUSTRIALI DEI PAESI EMERGENTI AGROINDUSTRIALI DEI PAESI EMERGENTI
2 TEMA SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
EDUCAZIONE ALIMENTARE E
STILI DI VITA
DIRITTI DEL LAVORO
TRASPARENZA E INFORMAZIONE
DEL CONSUMATORE
COME LE ECONOMIE PIU’ SVILUPPATE
POSSONO PROMUOVERE LA
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY NEI PAESI EMERGENTI
3 TEMASOSTENIBILITA’ & BIODIVERSITA’
INTERDIPENDENZASICUREZZA
ALIMENTARE /AMBIENTE
RIDUZIONE DEGLI IMPATTI & GESTIONE SOSTENIBILE DELLE
RISORSE (ACQUA, SUOLO, ENERGIA)
ADATTAMENTO AL CAMBIAMENTO
CLIMATICO E TUTELA DELLA BIODIVERSITA’
SOLO ATTRAVERSO LO SVILUPPO E SOLO ATTRAVERSO LO SVILUPPO E LL’’INNOVAZIONE SARAINNOVAZIONE SARA’’ POSSIBILE POSSIBILE
AFFRONTARE E VINCERE LE SFIDE AFFRONTARE E VINCERE LE SFIDE DEL FUTURO: LA CRESCENTE DEL FUTURO: LA CRESCENTE
DOMANDA ALIMENTARE MONDIALE E DOMANDA ALIMENTARE MONDIALE E LO SVILUPPO DEMOGRAFICO IN ATTO.LO SVILUPPO DEMOGRAFICO IN ATTO.
4 TEMARICERCA INNOVAZIONE, FORMAZIONE
RUOLO DELLE PIATTAFORME
KNOWLEDGE – BASED -BIO - ECONOMY
FORMAZIONE / NUOVE PROFESSIONALITA’’EXPO GENERATION
INNOVAZIONE E SVILUPPO DI NUOVI
PRODOTTI / PROCESSI
INNOVAZIONE DI FILIERA A SERVIZIO DELLA
SICUREZZA E DELLA QUALITA’
Road Map del GdL “NUTRIZIONE”
ISSUES:Eventi sul territorio;Eccellenze alimentari;“Sistema Italia” vs “Made in Italy”;Connettività con altri gruppi.
GdL Nutrizione Confindustria - attività
L’Industria Alimentare Italiana e gli Alimenti Funzionali:
la Tradizione presenta il Benessere:MILANO, 11 GIUGNO 2009
ROMA, 15 DICEMBRE 2009PARMA, 12 MAGGIO 2010
TERZO EVENTO DEL GDL NUTRIZIONE DI CONFINDUSTRIA IN VISTA DELL’EXPO 2015
PARMA & PIACENZA, 12 MAGGIO 20101. TERRITORIO/DISTRETTO
2 PARMA TEATRO REGIO“EXPO 2015 - FEEDING THE PLANET.
NUTRITION, WELL-BEING, BIODIVERSITY & SUSTAINABILITY”
“CULTURA DEL FARE E DEL SAPERE”PER LA VALORIZZAZIONE DELLE
ECCELLENZE
International Conference Tracking the Future 10-11 November 2010, Milano
Future challenges of the feed-dairy chain-focus on safety and traceability
Prof. Hannu Korhonen
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Jokioinen, Finland
Determinants of food supply chain-need to compile and analyze data
Determinants of food supply chain-need to compile and analyze data
FARMFarmer
Socio-Economic Landscape
Feed modelsNutrient
management
Bio-Physical Landscape
Soil Vegetation Water Biodiversity
MARKETConsumer
BioactivesFood safetyBio-energy
Value chain
Carbon Finance
Traceability
Recent food safety crisesRecent food safety crises
BSE“Mad Cow Disease”
Salmonella Melamine Salmonella
Aflatoxin E.coli O157:H7
Website identification of dairy farms- tracing via numerical code on package label- authentic information about farm and milk production - limited applicability
Geographic tracing of cheese, e.g.- analytical tracing of Swiss Emmental or Parmesan for
Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) e.g peptides,volatile compounds- RFID tagging of Parmesan cheese
Adulteration of milk with melamine- serious health risk to infants- case for the need of a rapid global alert system ( e.g.RASFF in EU)
Examples of traceability applications in the feed –dairy chainExamples of traceability applications in the feed –dairy chain
TAG and ‘‘tagged whole wheel of Parmesan cheese
Melamine caseMelamine case
BBC News 17.09.2008
• Animal cloning• Feed GMOs• Environmental issues, incl. climate change• Microbial and chemical contaminants• Nanotechnology• Emerging zoonoses • Corporate responsibility
Current and future issues related to the safetyof the feed-dairy chain
Current and future issues related to the safetyof the feed-dairy chain
• SCNT (Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer) technology expanding globally to produce progeny with good production traits
• Cloned animals registered and ear-tagged• No statistical differences found in milk from cloned or uncloned
cows. • EGE opinion 2008: No convincing arguments to justify the production of
food from clones and their offspring.• EFSA opinion 2008: No indication that differences exist in terms of food
safety between food products from healthy cattle and pig clones and their progeny, compared with those from healthy conventionally-bred animals.
• Animal cloning for food production has the potential to become acontroversial public issue like GMOs
Animal cloningAnimal cloning
• EC Reg 1829/03 on GMOs in foods and consumer info• EC Reg 1830/03 on GMOs traceability• Few GMOs: maize, soy, rapeseed and potato approved by
EC for cultivation in EU• National authorisation proposed by EU• GMO feeds traded globally• Tracing with approved DNA based methods (PCR), max
limit set by EU• Traceability problem: Tracing of milk from cows fed with
GMO feed not possible ?
GMOGMO
• EU-Eco Regulation in 1992 • Food label mandatory in EU since July 2010. • From July 2010 the EU organic logo is obligatory for all organic pre-
packaged food products within the European Union. It is also possible to use the logo on a voluntary basis for non pre-packaged organic goods produced within the EU or any organic products imported from third countries.
• No definite difference found in composition and quality incomparison to conventional production
• No biomarkers available to identify organic milk• Documentation requested to verify organic production
• Problem in tracing as no specific biomarker identified
Organic productionOrganic production
Chemical contaminants in the feed-dairy chainChemical contaminants in the feed-dairy chain
• Mycotoxins are toxic metabolites produced by certain fungi/moulds (Aspergillus, Fusarium, Penicillium) in foods and feeds, especially tree nuts, peanuts, maize, and cottonseed.
• More than 300 different mycotoxins have been identified.
• Climate change is considered to increase the potential for fungigrowth and toxin formation
• Aflatoxin B1, the most toxic and carcinogenic mycotoxin, can be metabolized in cattle digestion and shows up as M1 in milk.
Mycotoxins 1Mycotoxins 1
• Aflatoxin carry-over from feeds to milk is 1-6 %, on average 2,5%.
• In European countries small occurrence (o.o6% of milk samples), In tropical countries high occurrence.
• EC Regulations 1881/06, amended EC 165/10 and WHO/FAO:maximum levels of aflatoxins (B1, B2, G1, G2, M1) in feeds and raw milk - 5 ppb (µg/kg) in feed (B1),- 0.05 ppb in milk (M1)
• Problems in traceability: Accuracy of rapid tests, different maxlimits globally
• Serious public health risk, difficult to identify and communicate to producers and consumers
Mycotoxins 2Mycotoxins 2
PRODUCT SAFETYENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY
NUTRITIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
OCCUPATIONAL WELFARELOCAL MARKET
PRESENCE ANIMAL WELFARE
ECONOMIC RESPONSIBILITY FOOD CHAIN (CSR)
DIMENSIONS
Forsman-Hugg, S., et al. 2008.
Corporate social responsibility dimensions in food chain
• Globalization, modern biotechnology and climate change will increase risks in food safety
• In the feed-dairy chain several new health risks are emerging
• Safety in the feed-dairy chain can be improved by well-functioning traceability systems covering the entire chain
• Social responsibility is considered as a new approach to add value tothe food supply chain
• The concept “Food Chain Integrity” could provide a suitable platform for dealing with emerging food safety issues
ConclusionsConclusions
Thank you for attention!
ThanksThanks
The new marketplace is the w o rld
ainiaTHE NEW MARKETPLACE IS THE WORLDM. Blasco, N. Vidal, J.M. Pinazo
The new marketplace is the w o rld
GLOBALISATION
Source – Confederation of the food and drink industries of the EU (CIAA, 2010)
The new marketplace is the w o rld
CONSUMERSFOOD
INDUSTRY
Legislation
Technology
Products
Food industry trends:
Products premium products, GMO, tailored food, genomics …
Technologies biotechnology, nanotechnology, intelligent packaging,…
Traceability – Basic Tool
The new marketplace is the w o rld
Activity 2.2 Fork to farm: Food (including seafood), health and well being
Area 2.2.1 - ConsumersMain line 2: Communication and education strategies in the food chain
KBBE.2011.2.1-01: Strategies for improving communication between social and consumer scientists, food technology developers and consumers (CSA-S)
Area 2.2.2 - NutritionMain line 3: New tools and concepts to support nutrition scienceExpected Impact: Better assessment of the nutritional status of the general population and specific subgroups. Common tools and methodologies (SOPs), which would allow compara-bility of data in Europe. Support to monitor, refine, and adjust dietary recommendations and interventions.
KBBE.2011.2.2-02: New technologies and tools and their potential application to nutrition research (CP-IP)
FP7 Reflection paper "Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, and Biotechnology"
Strategic Research Agenda 2007-2020 ETPFFL
The new marketplace is the w o rld
Activity 2.2 Fork to farm: Food (including seafood), health and well being
Area 2.2.3 - Food processingMain line 1: Process designExpected impact: Bridging scientific fields for spreading the excellence and for an innovation-driven increase of the competitiveness of food/feed producers and food/feed equipment manufacturers. Development of sustainable processes for new and innovative foods, supporting the competitiveness of European industries, in particular SMEs. Increased number of patents in the area and new market opportunities.
KBBE.2011.2.3-01: Sustainable cleaning and disinfection technologies (CP-FP)
KBBE.2011.2.3-02: Food Factory of the Future — Design Study (CSA-S)
Main line 2: PackagingExpected impact: Bridging scientific fields for spreading the excellence and for an innovation-driven increase of the competitiveness of food producers and food equipment manufacturers, measurable increase of food safety and quality, reinforcement of consumer trust in food. Increased number of patents in the area and new market opportunities. Novel food packaging technologies and novel tools for risk-benefit assessment of these technologies, including the potential use of recycled materials. Results would provide a basis for a risk management tool and address policy needs in the area of food contact materials.
KBBE.2011.2.3-03: Advanced and flexible technologies for active, intelligent and sustainable food packaging (CP-FP)
Strategic Research Agenda 2007-2020 ETPFFL
The new marketplace is the w o rld
Activity 2.2 Fork to farm: Food (including seafood), health and well being
Area 2.2.4 - Food quality and safetyMain line 1: Safety, quality and traceability along the whole food chain
Expected impact: Improved quality and safety of the food supply will contribute to the reduction of undesirable agents in food and feed, the prevention of adverse health effects, and the reduction of post-harvest losses and adulteration. Furthermore, science-based policy making for the benefit of European consumers will be supported.
KBBE.2011.2.4-01: Safety and quality of ready-to-eat foods (CP-FP)
Strategic Research Agenda 2007-2020 ETPFFL
The new marketplace is the w o rld
Area 2.2.5 - Environmental impacts and total food chainMain line 2: Sustainable food production and supply managementExpected impact: Development of dynamic modelling tools to demonstrate the sustainability frontiers of various food chains. Improved environmental performance of food products and processes and uptake of eco-efficient innovations by business and consumers. Promoting sustainable consumption and production patterns within the carrying capacity of ecosystems, mindful of requirements of conservation and management of natural resources, inter alia by avoiding overexploitation and pollution of renewable natural resources such as water, air and soil as well as waste generation.
KBBE.2011.2.5-01: Environmental sustainability in the European food and drink chain (CP-FP)KBBE.2011.2.5-02: Reducing post-harvest losses for increased food security —SICA (CP-FP SICA)
Main line 3: Food chain organisation and innovationExpected impact: Increased transparency of the food chain resulting in advancements in chain governance, efficiency and building trust with the consumer. The emergence of dynamic and sustainable SME networks capable of promoting and sustaining innovation in the food sector. Serving sector needs –cost/benefit and economic performance analysis. Serving consumer needs for affordable food of quality and diversity.
KBBE.2011.2.5-03: Food science and the retail sector: a platform for preparingthe effective integration of research findings within innovative concepts and applications (CSA-S)
Strategic Research Agenda 2007-2020 ETPFFL
The new marketplace is the w o rld
Food Technology future
Technologies for manufacturing higher quality, safer, more natural products
Technologies to achieve food with out contamination risks and with a farm-to-fork traceability
The new marketplace is the w o rld
UP TO DATE
•An implementation of intelligent monitoring system for food processing using neural networks (College of Automation, Chongqing University, China)
•RFID chips will help industry "gain insight into the total supply chain and enhance supply chain efficiencies” (Dan Vache, vice president of Supply Chain Management with the United Fresh Produce Association)
•A nano sensor to detect Salmonella bacteria has been developed which could enhance food safety and security (US Department of Agriculture’s Research Service)
•Edible nano-sensors made from silk could alert consumers to potential contamination of food produce through a hologram-like indicator embedded in the pack (US researchers)
•Active and intelligent (A&I) packaging has shifted from manufacturer concerns such as shelf-life and spoilage to consumer concerns such as freshness, quality and information (http://www.foodproductiondaily.com)
•A framework for early warning and proactive control systems in food supply chain networks (ITGroup, Wageningen University)
•Canadian food safety audit finds ‘deficiencies’ in tracking imports (http://www.foodproductiondaily.com)
The new marketplace is the w o rld
Global opportunities to remain competitive
New scenarios identification
Globalisation
New markets
Stakeholders alliance
Traceability – consumer information
- Quality & Security
Cheap labourGlobalisation
Outsourcing
Legislation, features…
Traceability – Quality & Security
Growth Trend - Shortage
Product reputationInternational Conference Perspectives for Food 2030Estudio Prospectiva OPTI
The new marketplace is the w o rld
Innovative products
CONSUMER DEMAND &
WISHES
Ageing population – quality of life
HEALTH & WELL-BEING
Lifestyle changes
Reverse Traceability – consumer information
Dietary patterns – from calories to nutrition
Traceability – Quality & Safety
Environment impact
GREEN
ENVIRONMENTTraceability – Added value information
Sustainable production
Global opportunities to remain competitive
International Conference Perspectives for Food 2030Estudio Prospectiva OPTI
The new marketplace is the w o rld
Food chain vision: strategic opportunities
Collaborative work
Resource optimization
Internationalization challenges
Cooperation among companies
Compete by service and added valueinstead of price: coopetition, co-innovation networks
From consumable products towardstechnological products (ubiquitousservices and products)
Consumer-oriented innovation
FOOD CHAIN INTEGRITY
ISO 22000 food chain
CONCLUSIONS
The new marketplace is the w o rld
Global food market concerns
•EU food industry plays a fundamental role worldwide, so traceability is a crucial tool both now and in the future in such a global market
→ need for more “Added value”
• New traceability-related tools and methodologies will become key factors for answering main trends during the following years (globalisation and consumer) and supporting new technological developments
→ need for “Food & health”, “ Add life to years”, “Environmentalissues”, etc.
• The constant evolution of the supply chain is the highest value, since the marketplace is the world
The new marketplace is the w o rld
The new marketplace is the w o rld
Thank you very much for you attention!!!
Cooperation between Grant-making foundations:
The AGER Project
The project overall philosophy
AGER is a cooperative research project between grant-making foundations designed through a shared creative path
AGER it’s an open initiative based on cooperation and networking
AGER main objective is to make the difference in the agrofood sector by supporting leading-edge research projects
Project background
• Agro-food is a key sector in the Italian economy
• The Agro-food sector needs to boost R&D
• Increasing demand for safety and product traceability
• Public understanding
the need of clustering excellent public and private research centres and universities against the dispersionof competences
the need of a dedicated national funding scheme forAgroofood R&D
to act as a system matching general needs with a particular attention to local impacts
to test in a concrete way a new cooperativeapproach in R&D programme management
Opportunities
The AGER partnership
The R&D targets
Ager, during the first 3 years of activity, will focus R&Dfunding on:
Cereals: durum wheat, riceFruit & vegetables (apples, pears and fresh-cutproduce)Vine growing and Wine producingPig’s chain
The Budget
FOUNDATIONAnnual subscriptions TOTAL
Fondazione Cariplo 2.000.000 6.000.000 Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Bologna 1.000.000 3.000.000Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze 1.000.000 3.000.000Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Parma 1.000.000 3.000.000Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Cuneo 500.000 1.500.000Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Modena 500.000 1.500.000Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Teramo 500.000 1.500.000Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Trento e Rovereto 500.000 1.500.000Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Udine e Pordenone 500.000 1.500.000Fondazione di Venezia 250.000 750.000Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Ferrara 200.000 600.000 Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Vercelli 50.000 150.000Fondazione cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo 1.000.000 3.000.000
TOTAL 9.000.000 27.000.000
The Project’s governance
Management Committee Scientific Steering Committee
In 2007 the consortium agreement has been designed and negotiatedwith the potential partners
In January 2008 the consortium agreement was signed and the AGER association constituted (5 years temporary association)
THE DURUM WHEAT PRODUCTION CHAIN
-15,6 Ml23,4 Ml8Received
Merits evaluation by a panel composed by 4 international referees
3,6 Ml4,2 Ml6,3 Ml1Aknowledged tocontribution
5,6 Ml
Contributionrequired
17,4 Ml
19,2 Ml
Contributionrequired
1,2 Ml8,7 Ml2Partially aknowledged
Contributionassigned
Total costNumberProject detail
23,4 Ml9Allowed
25,7 Ml13Received
Total costNumberProject idea
Budget available € 5.000.000
VINE GROWING
Budget available € 5.000.000
-18,8 Ml27,7 Ml20Received
Merits evaluation by a panel composed by 9 international referees
0,4 Ml0,4 Ml0,6 Ml1Aknowledged tocontribution
4,3 Ml
Contributionrequired
19,4 Ml
19,9 Ml
Contributionrequired
3,9 Ml6,4 Ml2Partially aknowledged
Contributionassigned
Total costNumberProject detail
26,3 Ml21Allowed
27,0 Ml24Received
Total costNumberProject idea
APPLE PRODUCTION CHAIN
Budget available € 3.000.000
-8,9 Ml13,7 Ml4Received
Merits evaluation by a panel composed by 8 international referees
3,0 Ml3,6 Ml5,1 Ml1Aknowledged tocontribution
Contributionrequired
8,9 Ml
10,0 Ml
Contributionrequired
Contributionassigned
Total costNumberProject detail
13,7 Ml4Allowed
15,4 Ml6Received
Total costNumberProject idea
PEAR PRODUCTION CHAIN
Budget available € 2.500.000
-3,1 Ml4,4 Ml2Received
Merits evaluation by a panel composed by 4 international referees
2,5 Ml2,5 Ml3,5 Ml1Aknowledged tocontribution
Contributionrequired
4,0 Ml
4,0 Ml
Contributionrequired
Contributionassigned
Total costNumberProject detail
5,8 Ml2Allowed
5,8 Ml2Received
Total costNumberProject idea
OENOLOGY
13,9 Ml20,6 Ml11Received
Yet to evaluate
Contributionrequired
15,0 Ml
15,0 Ml
Contributionrequired
Total costNumberProject detail
22,1 Ml13Allowed
22,1 Ml13Received
Total costNumberProject idea
Budget available € 2.000.000
PIG PRODUCTION CHAIN
Budget available € 4.500.000
15,6 Ml22,9 Ml10Received
Yet to evaluate
Contributionrequired
16,0 Ml
17,8 Ml
Contributionrequired
Total costNumberProject detail
23,9 Ml11Allowed
26,6 Ml17Received
Total costNumberProject idea
RICE PRODUCTION CHAIN
Budget available € 2.700.000
9,6 Ml14,0 Ml7Received
Yet to evaluate
Contributionrequired
11,3Ml
11,8 Ml
Contributionrequired
Total costNumberProject detail
16,2 Ml8Allowed
17,3 Ml9Received
Total costNumberProject idea
FRESH-CUT FRUIT&VEG
Budget available € 1.300.000
7,9 Ml11,5 Ml7Received
Yet to evaluate
Contributionrequired
10,2 Ml
10,4 Ml
Contributionrequired
Total costNumberProject detail
15,0 Ml7Allowed
15,4 Ml8Received
Total costNumberProject idea