setting the stage for interaction

36
Drew Harry MIT Media Lab Setting the Stage for Interaction a tablet application to augment group discussion in a seminar class Eric Gordon Emerson College Chris Schmandt MIT Media Lab

Upload: drewww

Post on 05-Dec-2014

724 views

Category:

Design


3 download

DESCRIPTION

CSCW 2012 Presentation Full paper available here: http://web.media.mit.edu/~dharry/tincan.pdf We present a tablet-based system to collaboratively track discussion topics and ideas in a seminar-style discussion classroom. Each student uses his or her own tablet to share text ideas in a synchronized, visual environment. The system is designed to promote diverse participation and increase engagement. Our findings are based on observations of twelve class sessions and interviews with participating students. Instead of simply introducing an additional text-based communication channel into the classroom, we find that the system creates a new “stage” (in the Goffman sense) on which students could perform in ways that the main spoken stage could not support. This stage coexists with spoken communication, and augments how students attend to the material and each other. We conclude that spoken participation alone poses barriers for some participants and the addition of a non-oral, textbased stage can help establish equitable and engaging discussions in the class

TRANSCRIPT

Drew HarryMIT Media Lab

Setting the Stage for Interactiona tablet application to augment group discussion in a seminar class

Eric GordonEmerson College

Chris SchmandtMIT Media Lab

flickr / eston

flickr / Tommy Huynh

EM

AIL

TE

XT

ME

SSA

GE

INST

AN

T M

ESSA

GE

TW

ITT

ER

Front Channel

Back Channel

Front Channel

Back Channel

Back Stage

Front Stage

Back Stage

Front Stage

Side Stage

Main Stage

Tin Can

Not everyone is equally comfortable participating.

People talk one-at-a-time; simultaneous speaking is viewed as impolite.

Power dynamics can diminish participation.

Ideas Topics

Time

Participation

Presence

Archival Artifacts

Ideas Topics

Time

Participation

Presence

Archival Artifacts

19 Students

22 Hours

119 Topics

839 Ideas

Attention

Promotion

Prioritizing Stages

Tablets

Intro

Design

Con

clusio

nStu

dy

Intro

Design

Con

clusio

nStu

dy

Attention

Intro

Design

Con

clusio

nStu

dy

Intro

Design

Con

clusio

nStu

dy

Promotion

Intro

Design

Con

clusio

nStu

dy

Promotion

“I feel like [the professor] would be a speaker for people who couldn’t speak, you know. The fact that he was really into Tin Can, so he would read something that [a student] had written and be like oh, I want to quote this or talk about it and [act] as a spokesman for people who aren’t really comfortable speaking”

Intro

Design

Con

clusio

nStu

dy

Intro

Design

Con

clusio

nStu

dy

Prioritizing Stages

Intro

Design

Con

clusio

nStu

dy

Prioritizing Stages

“I can remember a particular ... presentation that he was doing a lot of PowerPoint, I think he was completely oblivious to the Tin Can conversation and [the Tin Can conversation] ended up going in a very good direction ... as a result, I do not remember anything he said, because ... the conversation on Tin Can was a little more engaging”

Intro

Design

Con

clusio

nStu

dy

Intro

Design

Con

clusio

nStu

dy

Tablets

Intro

Design

Con

clusio

nStu

dy

“[I like to] organize my language a lot before I actually talk because I want my thoughts to be systematical and clear, I want people to get it.”

Intro

Design

Con

clusio

nStu

dy

“gave more people a chance to say things that they wouldn’t say”

Intro

Design

Con

clusio

nStu

dy

“something that was on my side, so to speak. You know what I mean? ... Like it was a resource.”

Questions?Drew HarryMIT Media Lab

Eric GordonEmerson College

Chris SchmandtMIT Media Lab

tincan.it

[email protected]

@drewwww

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Google and TrustGoogle China

Public versus Private InternetLife as a game

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Power of repression Truth about sexConfession

Time since class start (m)

Logic of censorshipArs Erotica

Discussion