setting-up a performance coe lessons from 4 stories … a performance coe lessons from 4 stories...
TRANSCRIPT
AGENDA
1. Defining ‘Performance Center of Expertise’
2. 4 Stories
3. Lessons learned.
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 2
4 Messages
• There are plenty of good BPM/Performance CoE model out there – Executing on them is a different matter.
• No fairy tale…It’s a long road paved of successes and hard leadership learnings.
• Very powerful transformational lever, even more so in these interesting days and ages!
• Success is in the eyes of the beholder!
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 4
AGENDA
1. Defining ‘Performance Center of Expertise’
2. 4 Stories
3. Lessons learned.
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 5
What is a Performance CoE?
ALL ABOUT THE WHY AND THE ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT !
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 7
A Performance CoE is…
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 8
A centralized or decentralized process driven performance experts team delivering measurable
organization wide business and customer performance improvements through strategic
transformation programs, process performance improvement projects and capability
development initiatives.
Context Driven Models
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 9
Strategy, Process Architecture, Performance Measurement, Process Management, Alignment, BPM Priorities and Planning
EnterpriseLevel
Business Process Level
Implementation Level
Process Redesign & Improvement Projects, Six Sigma, Lean, Documentation Projects
.
Human Resource Development
Projects undertaken to develop resources for processes
Job DesignTraining DevelopmentKnowledge Management
Specific Activity
Business Processes
IT Development
ERP InstallationApplication DevelopmentBusiness Activity MonitoringBusiness Process Management Applications
A Mix of IT and HR
Development
Hardware UsedPhysical Plant and
Copyright © BPTrends Associates – All Rights Reserved
Three Typical Patterns defining CoE Model Evolution
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 10
1• BPMS CoE• SAP CoE• Case Mngt CoE
TECHNOLOGY FOCUS
Three Typical Patterns defining CoE Model Evolution
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 11
2• Lean / 6 sigma CoE• BPM CoE• BA CoE
PROCESS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOCUS
Three Typical Patterns defining CoE Model Evolution
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 12
3• Transformation –Digitalization –
Modernization Office• Continuous Improvement
Program Office
CORPORATE WIDE PROGRAM FOCUS
Three Typical Patterns defining CoE Model Evolution
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 13
1
2
3• Transformation –Digitalization –
Modernization Office• Continuous Improvement
Program Office
• Lean / 6 sigma CoE• BPM CoE• BA CoE
• BPMS CoE• SAP CoE• Case Mngt CoE
TECHNOLOGY FOCUS
PROCESS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOCUS
CORPORATE WIDE PROGRAM FOCUS
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 14
They all face the same challengeCrossing the projects & short term focus chasm!
DANGER ZONE TIPPING POINT
AGENDA
1. Defining ‘Performance Center of Expertise’
2. 4 Stories
3. Lessons learned.
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 15
4 Cases in a nutshell
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 16
CASE 1 CASE 2 CASE 3 CASE 4
INDUSTRY TRAVELLING SERVICES
EXPORT FINANCIALSERVICES
INSURANCE FINANCIALSERVICES
COMPANY SIZE 9 000 YEES 1 000 YEES 3 000 YEES 30 000 YEES
CoE CREATION YR 2011 (4) 2005 (10) 2014 (1) 2009 (6)
SPONSOR (s) CIO CIO/BUS CIO VP IT & VP Performance BUs
CHAMPION (s) CONSULTANT VP IT SERVICES CONSULTANT MULTIPLE
DOMINANT MODEL 6 sigma – Lean& BPMS (2) BPM & Lean (1) Integrated
performance (1)BPMS &
Lean/BA (+s)
INITIAL FLIGHT PATH
CoE TEAM SIZE (est) 15 10 4 20+
TIPPING POINT CROSS NO YES CROSSING NO
2 3 123 21
4 Cases in a nutshell
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 17
CASE 1 (Travelling Services) CASE 2 (Export Financial Services)
CONTEXT & MAIN DRIVER
CIO high process awarenessPAIN
VP convinced CIO key to IT transformation + key bus allies (VP)
VISION & PAIN
GETTING TO YES Education, CEO aware (met with another CEO), BU exec wanted it
CIO bought it as part of the transformation, underground work, CEO/SrVP adopted model-
Lean
BUILDING CAPABILITY
Successful BPMS pilot, spreading Aris Express, from ISO to BPM to LSS, CIO process arch
Top down approach – Bus arch driven, small mid-market BPMS pilot by architecture, major
Lean program for a BU, HR lead
GETTING BUS BUY-IN One IT BU did it, still looking for CEO full buy-in, 1 BU in
Board & major clients screaming, intl consulting firm selling success to CXO, CEO+SrVP clear
leadership (top-down)
DELIVERING RESULTS Projects driven Projects driven
HURDLES
Getting CEO’s full engagementFinding the right tipping point project
Rediscovering power of the Bus architectureLeveraging existing allies, culture
Too many executives level changes, including CIO, buy-in for Lean of the Insurance value
chain
WINNING MOVES BPMS in one BU, from SS to L, IT transformation as a new locomotive, successful BPMS delivery
Using BARC as a stepping stone and influence platform, CEO-CXO buy-in
4 Story Lines
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 18
CASE 3 (Insurance Group) CASE 4 (Financial Services Group)
CONTEXT & DRIVERBPM Capability Assessment (CFO) + CIO (key to
transformation), VP BU championVISION & PAIN
Independent technology platform play & business analyst play
PAIN
GETTING TO YES BU Health at risk, CIO had money and leadership, building momentum IT transformation
Architecture foundation (BPMS)BU (Performance unit???)
BUILDING CAPABILITY
Bus. Arch. Of value streams to value chains, Kaizens in BU & IT, Integrated CoE & BPMS as foundational piece, integrated governance
BPMS in // with Performance Teams in each Bus, massive green belt training
GETTING BUS BUY-INImpacts PPM
CIO engaged in BU exercise – IT buy-inTop-down
Very uneven, many locomotives but short termism blinds decision makers,Adding LSS/Bus leader in IT helps
DELIVERING RESULTS Starting – Kaizen/Governance First big projects for slow clock speed
HURDLESLeadership and culture of a BU, new Group CEO,
Establishing strong collaboration with existing performance team, budget, BU culture
Repositioning performance team, connecting to back office transformation initiatives, delivery
time/costs, solution delivery cycle time, reconnecting to business architecture, culture
WINNING MOVESBus architecture, finding business champion and
delivering, Integrated model, getting CIO in, Bimodal IT key
Integrating business performance specialist (relationship management) in BPMS CoE
AGENDA
1. Defining ‘Performance Center of Expertise’
2. 4 Stories
3. Lessons learned.
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 19
So…What does the previous stories tell you?Would you qualify them as successful?
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 20
Successful?...It depends!
• It depends what were the drivers, expectations and targeted outcomes.
• None of them came to a halt or was abandoned – marathon continues.
• Few went from CoE status to integrated business service units into BUs.
• Mix of highly successful projects and painful high learning projects.• Very few successfully switched to an enterprise wide (multi BUs)
strategic program status.• Capability build-up & project delivery led, culture shift lagged
without the Lean ingredient.• Governance & business architecture made a difference.• Does not matter where they started from, they are all still evolving.
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 21
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 22
Lesson 1 – No unique and linearpath
FROM LEAN TO BPM GOVERNANCE & ARCH. TO BPMS
FROM BPMS TO PROJECTS, TO SYSTEMATIC MONITORING, TO BPM GOVERNANCE TO
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 23
Source: BPTrends Associates
Lesson 2 – Try to stay in the sweet spot
1:Initial 2:Basic 3:Competent 4:Mastery 5:Innovative
BUSI
NES
S PE
RFO
RMA
NC
E &
PRO
CES
S M
GN
T C
APA
BILI
TY &
MA
TURI
TY
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT& PROCESS CULTURE MATURITY
BUSINESS PROJECTSVALUE CREATION
SWEET SPOT
Discrete Performance Improvement & Process ProjectsFew Capability Development – Acquisition Projects
Transversal Process & Performance Improvement Projects & Major CapabilityConsolidation Projects
Lesson 3 – Be ready to worksystemically on multiple capabilities
05/10/2015 24BBC Conference USA 2015
Decision making Accountability Let’s build it and they will come Fuzzy « why » No KPIs or clear outcomes Lack of data to measure project
outcomes Execution leadership Weak executive sponsorship No bimodal IT Overplaying Technology Lack of standards HR levers misaligned Lack of capacity & misaligned
competencies Unrealistic expectations Misaligned model and execution
strategy with context & maturity
Lesson 4: Get the Right Mix of Expertise
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 25
Placeholder
BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE
TRANSFORMATION & CHANGE MANAGEMENT
PROCESS/BUSINESS ANALYSIS
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENTINDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
BUSINESS SOLUTION DELIVERY & MGNT PLATFORM
CORPORATE PERFORMANCE MGNT & MEASUREMENT
BPM
Lesson 5 – Get the right services portfolio mix
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 26
Business ArchitectureServices
Governance & Project Office
servicesProcess Performance
Improvement Services
Process ManagementServices
Corporate Performance& Change Management Services
Business ProcessSolutions Delivery
Lesson 6 – Balance 3 key levers
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 27
PERFORMANCE PROJECTS DELIVERY
Business Consulting Services
Project Management Services
Pilot/War Room
GOVERNANCE ENHANCEMENT
Process Governance support
Lean Governance support
Performance Projects Governance support
Process management
CORE CAPABILITIES DEV ACCELERATION
Coaching, training, education Methodology, tools &
standards Process culture development HR Levers Alignment Audit & QA Technical-User Support Practitionners’portal
MEASURED & SIGNIFICANT PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
Few parting thoughts
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 28
Start with the END (PURPOSE) in mind
Execution leadership and competencies are key
Find the right accelerators & deliver results in short cycles
Aim for a bush fire strategy
Sponsor needs the right champion … vice et versa
Few parting thoughts
05/10/2015 BBC Conference USA 2015 29
Don‘t mix means and ends – Beware of dogmatism
Tech. is not the issue, execution & change mgnt are
Align capability and expectations with maturiy
Change decision makers SEE first
Bus. Arch. & governance are key to cross the chasm