sffe may 2012 - the free market for electricity
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
1/16
The free market for electricity
does it work?
SFFE Lunch seminar
03.05.12Henrik Karlstrm
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
2/16
Demands for interference and control have
resurfaced lately [...] This time, too, I hopegovernment keeps a cool head and refrains from
overzealous regulation
- Einar Hope, 10 r med energiloven (2005)
When you have a market failure, no amount of
belief in the markets ability to solve problemshelps. You need political control
- Einar Hope in interview March 2009
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
3/16
What am I talking about?
The questions: How do we evaluate policy, and by what criteria?
What is good governance?
The case: A deregulated market for electricity
Advantages and problems
Who does/did what, and how do they think about theelectricity market and its functions?
Examples from interviews, surveys, official statistics,law documents, government white papers
What can we learn from this?
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
4/16
Evaluating policy
What is the point of policy?
To solve, organise, delineate, delegate. But how?
What criteria should we use to evaluate a
policy?
According to what goals?
Economic (efficiency), political (re-election, system
reproduction), ethical (distributionary, non-discriminatory), popular (democratic, participatory)?
Who should do the evaluation?
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
5/16
The Norwegian electricity market
Deregulated since 1991
Split in two parts one competitive and one
natural monopoly
About 100 utilities to choose from
Stated goals:
More efficient use More income from forced exports
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
6/16
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
7/16
How to evaluate this economically?
The aim of managing the power system is to
minimize the social-economic costs of all
Norwegian supply of energy that may be
covered by the electrical power system
- NOU 1985 Energilovgivningen, p. 8
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
8/16
Personally, I believe prices as a tool will give
conservation effects without negative side
effects. We know from our own households that
there is something to be had from usingelectricity more sparingly
- Labour MP Tom Thoresen (1975)
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
9/16
Price development
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
10/16
Consumption development
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
11/16
The economists verdict: Success!
The market has performed well in terms of economicefficiency and market functionality (Bye & Hope 2005)
The market is working a lot better (Economist BenteHalvorsen in interview April 2009)
When prices go up, consumption does go down
Even if it is only 5 10 % reduction for a tripling of prices,it would have been even less without an incentive
No actors exert market dominance
But they do rotate
Owners (Norwegian municipalities) are making a lotmore money
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
12/16
However
People arent really market oriented:
6 % change supplier in a given year
65 % explicitly want to keep old supplier
2/3 want more political control over
production and prices
Majority thinks utilities make too much money
Supply deficits spark intense media debate
Missing investment incentives
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
13/16
Points of note
Policy makers and the public are not in sync
This may be because they expect different thingsfrom the market policies Politicians: efficiency
Public: reliably cheap electricity
Legitimacy for a policy is tied up to its publicperception Which is why we see so much legitimising work done
Income from sale of electricity is not evenlydistributed Some municipalities have become rich, others not
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
14/16
Why the difference?
Almost all involved in the law change were trainedeconomists The designers (obviously)
The minister in charge, Eivind Reiten
The opposition politician responsible, Arne yen The bureaucrats
Politicians do not really understand economics Many thought prices would go down
Except those who knew but chose to keep quiet Other explanations:
People are stupid
These are minor problems the system works!
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
15/16
For discussion
When a policy seems to be working but no
one is happy, is it working?
Who is fit to evaluate?
The technocracy, the electorate, the average joe?
Who is fit to make policy?
What do we want a policy to do? Regulate, stimulate, delegate?
-
7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity
16/16
Thank you!