sffe may 2012 - the free market for electricity

Upload: henrikkarlstrom

Post on 04-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    1/16

    The free market for electricity

    does it work?

    SFFE Lunch seminar

    03.05.12Henrik Karlstrm

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    2/16

    Demands for interference and control have

    resurfaced lately [...] This time, too, I hopegovernment keeps a cool head and refrains from

    overzealous regulation

    - Einar Hope, 10 r med energiloven (2005)

    When you have a market failure, no amount of

    belief in the markets ability to solve problemshelps. You need political control

    - Einar Hope in interview March 2009

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    3/16

    What am I talking about?

    The questions: How do we evaluate policy, and by what criteria?

    What is good governance?

    The case: A deregulated market for electricity

    Advantages and problems

    Who does/did what, and how do they think about theelectricity market and its functions?

    Examples from interviews, surveys, official statistics,law documents, government white papers

    What can we learn from this?

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    4/16

    Evaluating policy

    What is the point of policy?

    To solve, organise, delineate, delegate. But how?

    What criteria should we use to evaluate a

    policy?

    According to what goals?

    Economic (efficiency), political (re-election, system

    reproduction), ethical (distributionary, non-discriminatory), popular (democratic, participatory)?

    Who should do the evaluation?

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    5/16

    The Norwegian electricity market

    Deregulated since 1991

    Split in two parts one competitive and one

    natural monopoly

    About 100 utilities to choose from

    Stated goals:

    More efficient use More income from forced exports

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    6/16

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    7/16

    How to evaluate this economically?

    The aim of managing the power system is to

    minimize the social-economic costs of all

    Norwegian supply of energy that may be

    covered by the electrical power system

    - NOU 1985 Energilovgivningen, p. 8

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    8/16

    Personally, I believe prices as a tool will give

    conservation effects without negative side

    effects. We know from our own households that

    there is something to be had from usingelectricity more sparingly

    - Labour MP Tom Thoresen (1975)

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    9/16

    Price development

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    10/16

    Consumption development

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    11/16

    The economists verdict: Success!

    The market has performed well in terms of economicefficiency and market functionality (Bye & Hope 2005)

    The market is working a lot better (Economist BenteHalvorsen in interview April 2009)

    When prices go up, consumption does go down

    Even if it is only 5 10 % reduction for a tripling of prices,it would have been even less without an incentive

    No actors exert market dominance

    But they do rotate

    Owners (Norwegian municipalities) are making a lotmore money

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    12/16

    However

    People arent really market oriented:

    6 % change supplier in a given year

    65 % explicitly want to keep old supplier

    2/3 want more political control over

    production and prices

    Majority thinks utilities make too much money

    Supply deficits spark intense media debate

    Missing investment incentives

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    13/16

    Points of note

    Policy makers and the public are not in sync

    This may be because they expect different thingsfrom the market policies Politicians: efficiency

    Public: reliably cheap electricity

    Legitimacy for a policy is tied up to its publicperception Which is why we see so much legitimising work done

    Income from sale of electricity is not evenlydistributed Some municipalities have become rich, others not

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    14/16

    Why the difference?

    Almost all involved in the law change were trainedeconomists The designers (obviously)

    The minister in charge, Eivind Reiten

    The opposition politician responsible, Arne yen The bureaucrats

    Politicians do not really understand economics Many thought prices would go down

    Except those who knew but chose to keep quiet Other explanations:

    People are stupid

    These are minor problems the system works!

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    15/16

    For discussion

    When a policy seems to be working but no

    one is happy, is it working?

    Who is fit to evaluate?

    The technocracy, the electorate, the average joe?

    Who is fit to make policy?

    What do we want a policy to do? Regulate, stimulate, delegate?

  • 7/30/2019 SFFE May 2012 - The Free Market for Electricity

    16/16

    Thank you!