sgtf-sc meeting 4 december 2015 sgtf-eg3 regulatory ... - reporting eg3 eg1 eg2 - 04.12.2… · 4...
TRANSCRIPT
EnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
SGTF-SC meeting 4 December 2015
SGTF-EG3Regulatory
recommendations
Manuel Sánchez, Ph.D.Team Leader Smart Grids
Directorate for Internal Energy MarketDirectorate General for Energy
European Commission
2/6Dr.-Ing. Manuel Sánchez Jiménez © European Commission 2015 manuel.sanchez–[email protected]
http://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/markets-and-consumers/smart-grids-and-meters
EG3 to deliver regulatory recommendations:
2014-15 EG3 report on DR framework:-Consensus on 14 recommendations (and six refinements) for a possible DR framework
2016 proposal:-Consolidate an EU forum for smart grid regulatory issues on key topics
3/6Dr.-Ing. Manuel Sánchez Jiménez © European Commission 2015 manuel.sanchez–[email protected]
Table with proposed EG3 workshopsTopic of the event When? Place Organising Committee
Market Design for Demand Response and Self-consumption
2 March
EC or
CEDEC
EC, CEDEC,CEER, EASE,ENTSO-E, ESMIG, Eurelectric, Orgalime, SEDC, COGEN (?),SunPower
Storage, incl. power to gas April EDSO EC, EASE, EDSO, ENTSO-E, Eurogas
Incentives for innovation June ENTSO-E
EC, CEER, ENTSO-E, Euroelectric, SEDC, T&D
Smart Homes/Building Sept.ESMIG & Orgalime
EC, CECED, ECOS, ESMIG, Orgalime,
4Dr. Manuel Sánchez Jiménez © European Commission manuel.sanchez–[email protected]
SGTF-SC meeting 4 December 2015
SGTF-EG1Standards and interoperability
Manuel Sánchez and Dina FiliouTeam Leader Smart Grids
Directorate for Internal Energy MarketDirectorate General for Energy
European Commission
5/6Dr.-Ing. Manuel Sánchez Jiménez © European Commission 2015 manuel.sanchez–[email protected]
Commission report of 10 October 2014Benchmarking smart metering deployment in the EU-27
6/6Dr.-Ing. Manuel Sánchez Jiménez © European Commission 2015 manuel.sanchez–[email protected]
2015 EG1 Report on interoperability:-All 17 MS plan to provide reading directly to consumers (USB, web, etc.) -14 MS frequent update readings (85% from EU)-12 MS support advance tariff systems-Majority MS intents to roll-out standardised interfaces, but not improve interoperability
2016 Proposal for work on two streamlines:-Investigate the challenges for "demand response ready"-Prepare the ground for a "Green Button at EU level" to standardised the type and format of consumer data
Positive evolution since the benchmarking study in 2014
DSF Interoperability- ESMIG position
• We agree with the recommendations of the EG1 report
• ESMIG can assist Member States with taking the right approach for reaching interoperability
• Interoperability issues related to Smart Metering standards (incl. H interfaces) SM-CG
• Overall alignment of data (format) definitions: study by experts
DSF Interoperability
I: Existing CEN/CLC/ETSI combinations
II: New developments by CLC TC205 and ETSI (SAREF)
III: New developments by IEC TC57 and openADR
Information on II needs to be provided by I and III:
Alignment needed
Action 2.1 Contribution to the French draft digital bill
Multi-Energy Data governance & European Green Button Prospective
Executive SummaryFrench Strategic Committee for Eco-Industries (COSEI)
Energy Efficiency Working Group Networks Subgroup
Réunion transversale CNI – 12 février 2015 10
COSEI Presentation COSEI Network WG Objectives & Contributors
COSEI Network Group : COSEI is an official consultation body between French State Economy Department (DGE) and Sustainable Development and Climate (DGEC). COSEI states for “Stategic Orientation Committee of Eco Industries - Grid Group”. It is dedicated to the development of the Eco Technologies and is structures around 4 big areas of which renewable energy and Energy EfficiencyObjectives of this contribution:The purpose is to make all the stakeholders and decision makers aware of the importance of the governance of energy data, in the context of legislative initiatives on the management of data and energy transition. It offers a firmly local or national multi-energy approach based on a principle of economic efficiency, based on consensus and recommendation approach.WG Contributors: The COSEI group gathers numerous stakeholders such as industrials, network operators (heat, gas electricity and hydrogen), local authorities associations, customer associations, research centers representatives, ministries
Réunion transversale CNI – 12 février 2015 11
Recommendation 1Special Status for anonymised & useful data
Recommendation title: Give energy data the status of General Interest dataRecommendation extract: Data can be considered as general interest data when making it available is justified in the interest of the general public (public policy, scientific research, new economic activities)This data should be considered as being of general interest for access conditions that would be defined according to player categories:•Anonymised energy-metering data for the residential, tertiary and industry sectors (and associated geolocation data) covered by the Articles referred to in the PLTECV (Draft Energy Transition for Green Growth Act)•Local data on the network connection capacity to integrate new producers or consumers into the network (the relevant geographical mesh will have to be specified)An additional study out of this scope could focus on peripheral data (for example data related to usage downstream of meters, energy billing data, weather forecasting data, etc.)
Réunion transversale CNI – 12 février 2015 12
Recommendation 2A Common Green Button for “Trusted Third Parties”
Recommendation title: Standardise data streams and procedures for obtaining consent based on internationally recognised protocols, and strengthen the role of trusted third parties (New Green Button)
Recommendation extract: Existing US Green Button seems not appropriate for Europe (proprietary standard, limitations)Grid operators (trusted third parties in France) should be asked to define a common standard for creating a New Green Button model that could also be proposed as a European model. This format would thus support "personal" and "anonymised" exchanges of data and its geolocation for all types of energies, which would considerably simplify cross-use, both for downloadable data but also streamed data on a predefined period.It would also allow the procedures used to obtain agreement to be standardised, bearing in mind that the two tasks (standardisation of data on the one hand and end-user managing consent on the other) are different, but mutually enhancing. It is in fact the combination of the two tasks that makes the "Green Button" initiative effective. Some French grid operators are already (but independently) in the process of defining and testing a standard for the New Green Button model, based on the CIM international standard that is widely used in the energy sector.
Réunion transversale CNI – 12 février 2015 13
Recommendation 3Open this Green Button Label to Private Sector
Recommendation title: Promote the extension of the “New Green Button" model downstream of the meterRecommendation extract: Model be extended to private systems and services generating data downstream of energy meters for the purposes of simplifying the emergence of energy services that would cross metering data and downstream metering data. This could be done by creating an open label allowing the model to be extended to voluntary players in the downstream sector.
Réunion transversale CNI – 12 février 2015 14
Recommendation 4Support local multi energy platform initiatives
Recommendation title: Support and assist local authorities wishing to develop multi-energy data platforms on their own behalf and also allowing third parties (economic players or academic researchers) to access them. Recommendation extract: A need for centralisation on a single platform seems desirable for consumers. This would make it easier for them to find their data for all the energies they use, the consents they have granted and their history - all in an identical format. Similarly, centralising data from different energy flows, and also heritage data, will enable local authorities to optimise their energy planning, allowing, for example, arbitrage from one type of energy to another. It is therefore recommended that local authorities be given support and assistance in setting up such multi-energy data platforms for themselves or on behalf of individuals and companies in their region, should they so wish. This recommendation is close to consensus, but economic interest of such structures needs to be demonstrated and proven, as well as associated governance rules.
Réunion transversale CNI – 12 février 2015 15
Prospect Vision and ambition to be clarified by Authorities
Prospective extract: The measures described above (and particularly the consensus on recommendations 1, 2 and 3) are likely to create a clear data publication architecture that can be controlled by users and individuals. For Recommendation 4, several options were identified within the working group that wanted to highlight them to assist the legislator in his choice and encourage him to take action to give visibility to the sector: •Market activity: consider that beyond the "third-party" public service delegation role for each type of energy, the management of multi-energy platforms is a free competition activity reserved for private parties or for a local public initiative, such as for a city or a town. •Local public service: consider that energy-management meta-platforms are a public service in the energy sector and come under the same level of local governance as that described in the French Energy Transition Act (Local Authorities) to ensure public confidence in their subsequent use.•National public service: consider that a single government-regulated meta-platform within the framework of a public service delegation contract should assume this role to ensure public confidence in its subsequent use.
TSO-DSO cooperation – electricity
DSOs•CEDEC•EDSO4SG•EURELECTRIC•GEODE
TSOs
•ENTSO-E
Regular high-level meetings (+/- 4 meetings per year)
of TSOs and DSOson different electricity topics
CommissionDG Ener
(2/3 meetings per year) on TSO-DSO interface/cooperation
Meetings on 26 January and on 7 July 2015
• Memorandum of understanding (MoU) between ENTSO-E and Associations representing DSOs (signed 2/4/2015) :
Main goals: –Exchange of policy and communication papers (before their publication)–Joint activities in areas of common interest (besides existing cooperation on network codes):
• Roles and responsibilities of TSOs and DSOs• Coordinated planning of network development• Active and reactive power management• Data management
• First workshops (WS) (TSO & DSO experts - DG ENER as observer)
– General TSO-DSO interface (2 days: 17 and 18 March 2015)• Roles and responsibilities• Flexibility and congestion management• Active and reactive power management & exchange
OUTCOME: • Paper was presented to DG ENER on 7 July 2015• Officially published on 9 November 2015
– TSO – DSO Data management (3 days : 20 May and 11 & 12 June 2015)• DSO-TSO data needs• Exchange of data between DSO – TSO• Data collection / storage & governance• Data delivery and market facilitation
OUTCOME: Paper started, but not finalized (need for additional information)
EnergyEnergy
SGTF-SC meeting 4 December 2015
SGTF-EG2DPIA Template
Valerie Lorgé and Manuel SánchezDirectorate for Internal Energy Market
Directorate General for EnergyEuropean Commission
EnergyEnergy
Commission Recommendation 2014/724/EU: DPIA Template
EnergyEnergy
Activities performed so farDate Action Objective
5.3.2015 Kick-off Meeting by DG ENER Member States, National Data Protection Authorities, National Energy Regulators, the industry and civil society representatives
17.04.2015 Alliander/EDP Workshop – NL Alliander and EDP Distribuição initiative
29.04.2015 Alliander/EDP Workshop – PT Alliander and EDP Distribuição initiative
22.5.2015 DG ENER's Experience Sharing Workshop
Share experiences of the Alliander and EDP initiative with other utilities and encourage more DSOs.
24.09.2015 EDSO workshop. Incentivize/test the DPIA template with EDSO members.
EnergyEnergy
Activities planned for 2016Date Action Objective
22.01.2016 ENER Workshop with Betatesters Confirmed: ENEL, RWE and Oesterreichsenergie, and Alliander/EdP Not confirmed: ERDF, CEZ, Iberdrola
Febr. 2016 Mid Term Assessment Analysis of the recommendations and definition of actions
May 2016 ENER workshop Additional input from industry
Oct 2016 End of the Test Phase Final input and consensus
Dec. 2016 EC feedback to WP29 Report back on the test phase
EnergyEnergy
SGTF-SC meeting 4 December 2015
SGTF-EG2Energy Expert Cybersecurity
Platform – Expert Group
Michaela Kollau and Manuel SánchezDirectorate for Internal Energy Market
Directorate General for EnergyEuropean Commission
EnergyEnergy
Energy Expert Cyber Security Platform (EECSP)
EECSP –Expert Group (quartly)Analysis of energy specific needs and fill the gapsDevelop short to long term strategyRegular monitoring
Stakeholder Forum (annual)Sharing information and best practices in line with implementation of
legislation and evolution of risks, threats, etc.
Advise the Commission on policy and regulatory directions on cybersecurity for the whole energy sector
at European level
EnergyEnergy
EECSP – Expert Group
EnergyEnergy
EECSP – Expert GroupInitial Roadmap 2016-2017
Date Action Objective
16.12.2015 Kick-off meeting Set up the group, procedures and start gap analysis of legislation, incl. SoS, NIS, GDPR
22.04.2016 Draft analysis and draft report Draft for 1st deliverable
22.06.2016 Final report of gap analysis 1st deliverable and start strategy27.10.2016 Draft for the energy strategy Consolidate a 1st draft for the strategy 17.02.2017 Conclusion of the strategy Consensus and deliver the strategy17.05.2017 Final Strategy Deliver the final report & recommendations02.10.2017 Monitoring Monitoring report
EnergyEnergy
EECSP – Forum Meetings (under discussion)Date Action Objective
Q1/Q2 2016 CNECT-ENER Roundtable &1st EECSP Forum
High-level roundtable on cyber security in the energy sector in combination with the 1st
Forum Meeting to monitor/steer the progress achieved within the Expert Group meetings
18.10.2016 2nd EECSP Forum Meeting • to monitor the progress achieved within the Expert Group meetings
• steer their activity towards most desirable/useful outcomes from the energy sector perspective
• to validate the sector-wide relevance and applicability of the Expert Group outputs.
18.02.2017 3rd EESCP Forum Meeting • See above
29/6Dr.-Ing. Manuel Sánchez Jiménez © European Commission 2015 manuel.sanchez–[email protected]