shall we sing? lau hang yu. do you know… that there are 10,000,000 customers that went to a...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
My Presentation
• Part1: The market structure of the karaoke
service industry• Part2: Phenomenon: why it is hard to find
vacancies for karaoke in Sundays lunchtime…
Market structure
• Oligopoly• small no of firms • Large firm size• Products : close or perfect
substitutes• Frequent advertising
Note that in lunch time a serving of lunch is provided without additional cost, while additional food or snack in happy hours requires additional charge.
Neway California Red
Lunch time 40 36-44
Happy Hour 55 79
Prime time 69+59+69 79+49(29)
Overnight 55+59 69+49
Assumption…
• Mary is willing to pay a maximum of $30 for an hour to enjoy singing karaoke.
• She must have lunch for one hour since she is a healthy girl
• She values a lunch quality as good as the one provided by the shop as $28.
• Assume that no diminishing marginal utility applies to the four hours of her singing.
Going to lunch karaoke for three hours…You must have
lunch for one hour since you are a healthy guy
Cost= price of the services(44)+ alternative use of time(2 hours)(18*2)=(44+18*2)=80
You value a lunch quality as good as the one provided by the shop as $28.
Benefit=the enjoyment of the services=30*2+28=88
B(x)>c(x)
Going for karaoke in happy hours for four hours..
C(x)=cost you pay for the service+ alternative use of time=55+18*4=127
B(x)= benefit for singing four hours=30*4=120
B(x)<c(x)
Conclusion…
• Singing in different timeslot would generate different cost and different benefit
• Incentive does matter!• Providing catering together with karaoke
services increases consumers’ benefits thus increases their incentive for singing.
• Diversity of services provided by karaoke shops increases consumers’ incentive.