shankaraiah n :naik sir ppt thesis
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
AN ANALYSIS OF AN ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT FARMING DIFFERENT FARMING SYSTEMS IN HASSAN SYSTEMS IN HASSAN
DISTRICTDISTRICT
BY: THEERTHA PRASAD
PRESENTED BY: SHANKARAIAH, N
PAK-9120 Jr.M.Sc. Agril.Extn
INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION
• Agriculture has been the major source of livelihood in the country
• Indian agriculture is characterized by mixed farming
• Small and marginal farmers are unable to meet the need with the income from crop husbandry
Conti…Conti…
• In the recent years, integrated farming system gave scientific touch to the existing practices
• The main aim of the farming system are to improve rapidly the socio economic condition of the individual families
OBJECTIVESOBJECTIVES• To identify the existing farming systems
• To study the socio economic and personal characteristic of the farmers association with the farming systems
• To find out the adoption of improved practices in different farming systems
• To compare the profitability of the different farming systems based on the production activity.
• To document the constraints faced by farmers in adoption of different farming systems
REVIEW OF LITERATURE• Concept of farming system
• socio economic and personal characteristic of the farmers association with the farming systems
• Adoption of improved farm practices by farmers
Conti…Conti…
• Profitability of different farming systems
• Constraints faced by farmers in different farming systems
MATERIAL AND METHODSMATERIAL AND METHODS
• Locale of the studyLocale of the study Hassan district
Sl. No.
Types of farming system
Taluks
Number of respondentAlur Hassan
1. Rain cultivation system
15 28 43
2. Irrigated cultivation system
45 32 77
Total 120
Research design: “Ex-post facto”
Variables used in the studyVariables used in the studySl.No Variables Measurement
Dependent Variables
1. Adoption Procedure
2. Profitability Schedule
Independent variables
1. Age Procedure developed
2. Education Procedure developed
3. landholding Procedure developed
4. Mass media, extension contact and participation
Scale developed
5. Economic motivation Procedure developed
• Data collectionData collection Personal interview method- pre tested schedule
• Statistical tools usedStatistical tools used• Mean• Percentage• Standard deviation • Chi-square test• Correlation Coefficient• Multiple Regression Analysis
RESULTSRESULTS
Sl No.
Systems Number of farmers
percent
1. Crop production only 15 34.89
2. Crop production + animal husbandry
12 27.90
3. Crop production + coconut garden
3 06.97
4. Crop production + coconut garden+ animal husbandry
6 13.96
5. Crop production + animal husbandry + poultry
7 16.28
Total 43 100.00
Farming system identify based on the type of production activity in rainfed cultivation system n=43
RESULTSRESULTS
Sl No.
Systems Number of farmers
Percent
1. Crop production only 9 11.60
2. Crop production + animal husbandry
11 14.28
3. Crop production + coconut garden
24 31.17
4. Crop production + coconut garden+ animal husbandry
18 23.38
5. Crop production + animal husbandry + poultry
9 11.69
6 Crop production + animal husbandry + Fishery
6 7.79
Total 43 100.00
Farming system identify based on the type of production activity in irrigated cultivation systemn=77
Sl.No
Source of irrigation No. of farmers
Percent Net area irrigated(Acre)
Average area irrigated (Acre)
1. Canal only 10 12.99 15.0 1.50
2. Tank only 23 29.87 19.2 0.83
3. Open well only 3 03.89 08.0 2.60
4. Tube well 5 6.50 17.0 3.40
5. Canal +tank 21 27.28 21.5 1.02
6. Canal +tank + tube well
8 10.38 65.0 8.12
7 Canal +tank + tube well+ open well
7 09.09 69.0 9.85
Total 77 100.00 214.0 -
Water source in Irrigated Farming Systems
Water source in Irrigated Farming SystemsWater source in Irrigated Farming Systems
Overall adoption Scores of the Farming for Selected Overall adoption Scores of the Farming for Selected crops Under Different Farming System crops Under Different Farming System
SL.No.
Farming system
Adoption quotient Overall adoption
Ragi Paddy Maize Potato Ginger
1.Rainfed cultivation system
34.45 -------- 50.83 57.92 ------- 47.73
2. Irrigated cultivation system
41.19 70.65 59.16 69.08 43.07 56.63
Adoption Quotient of the Farmers for selected crops grown under different farming system
Crops
Ad
op
tio
n q
uo
tien
tA
do
pti
on
qu
oti
ent
Constraints faced by Farmers Under Constraints faced by Farmers Under Rainfed FarmingRainfed Farming
SL. No.
Constraints No. of farmers
Percent Rank
1. Lack of water resources 43 100.00 I
2. High cost of cultivation 42 97.67 II
3. Non availability of skilled labourers 41 95.34 III
4. High cost of input 38 88.33 IV
5. Occurance of pest and diseases 34 79.06 V
6. Non availability of loans 34 79.06 VI
7. Lack of improved breeds 24 55.81 VII
8. Lack of high yielding varieties 20 46.51 VIII
9. Non availability of quality seeds 18 41.86 IX
Constraints faced by Farmers Under Constraints faced by Farmers Under Rainfed FarmingRainfed Farming
SL. No.
Constraints No. of farmers
Percent Rank
10. Lack of mass media participation 18 41.86 X
11. Lack of veterinary hospital facility 16 37.02 XI
12. Lack of improved farm implements 19 42.55 XII
13. Lack of training 14 32.55 XIII
14. Illiteracy 14 32.55 XIV
15. Lack of Dairy Cooperative Societies 13 30.23 XV
16. Non availability of fertilizers and manures
12 27.90 XVI
17. Lack of profitable marketing system 10 23.25 XVII
18. Lack of transportation facilities 7 16.27 XVIII
IMPLICATION OF THE IMPLICATION OF THE STUDYSTUDY
• As the combination of enterprises gives more profit to the farmers ,its always better to follow more than one enterprise.
• Some small and marginal farmers who have vegetarian food habit, hesitate to adopt enterprises like poultry, sheep , goat etc.
• Instead of following monocropping, it is better to carry out mixed or intercropping to avoid loss and get more income.
IMPLICATION OF THE IMPLICATION OF THE STUDYSTUDY
• The constraints such as middleman problem, lack of storage facilities , electricity problem, non availability of soil testing report could be minimize by the concerned efforts of the concerned department.
• There is a tendency among farmers to grow specific crops like potato, ginger extensively that fetch more market prices.
THANK YOUTHANK YOU