shehorn letter to the editor re: kcspca

2
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your comments by clicking on "Reply." The county vs. KCSPA I just wanted to toss out my two cents on the recent developments between Kent County and the Kent County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals over the contract for dog-control services. Many readers are not going to like what I have to say, but here goes anyway: the KCSPCA should have no business doing animal control for Kent County. It is evident, from what I have witnessed and experienced in dealing with the KCSPCA, that this is an organization that has no regard for the people of Kent County. Keep in mind that, for years, whether intentional or not, the KCSPCA has been misleading the people of Kent County. Most people think that Animal Control and the KCSPCA are two separate entities, when, in fact, they are one and the same. In addition to that is the fact that although they investigate (and I use this word loosely here) complaints of animal neglect and abuse, and issue citations and fines for violations of the county’s code regarding animals, they are not, despite the conception of most people, official code enforcement for the county. Despite the fact that animal-control officers hold rank and issue and collect fines, they are not law enforcement, and so far as I can tell, are not required to take any form of law-enforcement training. No matter what any of the ACOs from the KCSPCA may say about vicious dogs and no matter how many animals have been put down because an ACO has deemed them vicious, in Kent County, no ACO has the authority to deem a dog vicious. That authority lies in the hands of a panel established in the state code. The power of the KCSPCA has gone unfettered, unchecked and unbalanced for far too long. Now, they are claiming that, although the organization has been poorly managed for several years now, it is the county government here inKentCountyand the government of the State ofDelawarethat caused them to go bankrupt last year because the two governments didn’t give them all the money they wanted. [“Kent SPCA spars with county over money, role – Agency seeks more funds while questions grow over its business performance,” article, June 10] To me, this is much akin to a child that spends all his weekly allowance on candy, then begs his parents for more money to

Upload: tacia-mcilvaine

Post on 18-Dec-2015

15 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Disgruntled and dishonest citizens with a "negative history" (the director's classic response) with Kent County SPCA/First State Animal Center/Delaware Animal Care & Control? Or patterns of behavior by the pound, also known as KCSPCA/FSAC/DEACC?

TRANSCRIPT

  • Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your comments by clicking on "Reply."

    The county vs. KCSPA I just wanted to toss out my two cents on the recent developments between Kent County and the Kent County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals over the contract for dog-control services. Many readers are not going to like what I have to say, but here goes anyway: the KCSPCA should have no business doing animal control for Kent County. It is evident, from what I have witnessed and experienced in dealing with the KCSPCA, that this is an organization that has no regard for the people of Kent County.

    Keep in mind that, for years, whether intentional or not, the KCSPCA has been misleading the people of Kent County. Most people think that Animal Control and the KCSPCA are two separate entities, when, in fact, they are one and the same. In addition to that is the fact that although they investigate (and I use this word loosely here) complaints of animal neglect and abuse, and issue citations and fines for violations of the countys code regarding animals, they are not, despite the conception of most people, official code enforcement for the county. Despite the fact that animal-control officers hold rank and issue and collect fines, they are not law enforcement, and so far as I can tell, are not required to take any form of law-enforcement training.

    No matter what any of the ACOs from the KCSPCA may say about vicious dogs and no matter how many animals have been put down because an ACO has deemed them vicious, in Kent County, no ACO has the authority to deem a dog vicious. That authority lies in the hands of a panel established in the state code.

    The power of the KCSPCA has gone unfettered, unchecked and unbalanced for far too long. Now, they are claiming that, although the organization has been poorly managed for several years now, it is the county government here inKentCountyand the government of the State ofDelawarethat caused them to go bankrupt last year because the two governments didnt give them all the money they wanted. [Kent SPCA spars with county over money, role Agency seeks more funds while questions grow over its business performance, article, June 10] To me, this is much akin to a child that spends all his weekly allowance on candy, then begs his parents for more money to

  • buy something else. At what point is it time to put the foot down and say, Enough is enough? I say, now is the time. If any of our county commissioners happen to read this, I beg you, please DO NOT renew the KCSPCAs contract for dog control; tell them enough is enough.

    Ricky Shehorn

    Hartly