shelda debowski, the university of notre dame: advocacy and leadership for learning innovation
DESCRIPTION
Shelda Debowski, Senior Consultant, Higher Education Development and former Deputy Vice Chancellor, The University of Notre Dame, Australia delivered this presentation at the 2014 Future of Learning conference. This two-day national forum focuses on new approaches, technologies, environments and best practices in post-secondary education. For more information about the annual event, please visit the conference website: http://www.informa.com.au/futurelearningconferenceTRANSCRIPT
Shelda Debowski
Senior Consultant, Higher Education Development
Shelda.Debowski.com.au
Advocacy and leadership for learning innovation
Learning Innovation & Reform
� Graduate Success � Flexible learning options / MOOCs � Industry connections /Work integrated learning � International focus � Engaged learners � Reflective practice � Lifelong learners � Learner focused …..
Leading innovation
New and different Undoing past practices Requiring new ways of thinking, doing, being….
fineartamerica.com
Engaging academics
What we need: Academics who are
� Knowledgeable about the proposed innovation / reforms
� Engaged in developing / embedding the new ideas
� Committed to changing their practices and values to reflect the innovations
� Committed to learning new skills and capabilities to support the innovations
� Strong advocates of the changes � Keen and able to contribute
Academic Identity
Academics and innovation
Innovation Barriers
� Strategy impediments (Kanter, 2006): � Hurdles too high, scope too narrow � Key contributors marginalised � Avoidance of failure / risk taking � Too many avenues being pursued
� Process: � Controls too tight � Planning, budgeting, reviews,
performance management, focused on meeting short-term KPIs and accountabilities
Innovation Barriers (2)
� Structure � Weak connectedness; strong segregation of possible
collaborators � Silos limit exchange, dialogue � Limited knowledge of relevant technologies
� Skills � Weak / dispersed leadership � Communication across the group is weak � Relevant skills for innovation not nurtured / encouraged.
Innovation Enablers
� Idea Generation and Creativity Process � Innovation culture � Strategy � Structure and organisation � Human Resources � Financial Resources � Information and Technology
Adapted from:
Typology of Innovation Enablers. Impactscan: a policy intelligence tools for regional innovation policy. Accessed at: http://extra.iwt.be/impactscan/tool/typology_of_innovation_enablers.htm
Innovation—the heart of the knowledge economy—is fundamentally social. Malcolm Gladwell
Creating the context for innovation: our challenge
� Innovative hotspots (Gratton, 2007) � Cooperative mindset
� Collective intelligence, insights, wisdom, learning, enjoyment, intellectual challenge
� Boundary spanning � Depths of relationships, trust, shared expertise, experimentation
and merging of knowledge � Igniting purpose
� Common and collective mission and purpose
� Productive capacity � Best use of talent; effective work context; productive work
flows, relationships managed, interdependencies and rhythms co-ordinated,
Who’s on your team?
Professionals
Other Stakeholders
Academic leaders
Academics?
Building your innovative vision
VISION � Do your academics have a clear sense of
priorities and purpose? � Do they match your set of priorities? � Will this really make a difference?
How?
http://www.ashpfoundation.org
Leaders, Models and Advocates
� Who is championing the push / initiatives? � Who are your models and advocates? Do they
have good standing with your academics? � How strong is the culture of support? � What do newcomers hear? � What are the rewards for being involved?
Implementation
� Are the initiatives feasible, practicable, achievable, well-considered and researched?
� Are your systems and infrastructure well set up and supportive?
� How much time and effort will individuals need to devote to the initiative?
Leading transitions
� Endings, losing, letting go � Neutral zone � New beginnings (Bridges, W. Leading Transitions)
Leading Learning Innovations
� Informed and credible � Articulate and present � Persuasive / passionate � Big picture and details � Leading the Change and the Transition � Generous and adaptable � Courageous
Universities: prepared & able?
� Understanding whole of institution reform � Preparation for leadership � Supportive professional / development staff � Consultative processes and expert facilitation � Project management as a change tool � Support during change and transitions � Sustainability of change agendas � System and process ready � Culturally disposed to innovation
Reflections:
� How would you rate your leadership of innovation?
� Is your university well
set up to support you?