shute, mihaly & weinberger for save laurel way the city of redwood city planning commission...

13
Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Save Laurel Way The City of Redwood City Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013 Comments in Opposition to the Laurel Way Joint Venture Project

Upload: nickolas-hawkins

Post on 13-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Save Laurel Way The City of Redwood City Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013 Comments in Opposition to the Laurel

Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for

Save Laurel Way

The City of Redwood City

Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013

Comments in Opposition

to the

Laurel Way Joint

Venture Project

Page 2: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Save Laurel Way The City of Redwood City Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013 Comments in Opposition to the Laurel

Save Laurel Way

Page 3: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Save Laurel Way The City of Redwood City Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013 Comments in Opposition to the Laurel

Save Laurel Way

Page 4: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Save Laurel Way The City of Redwood City Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013 Comments in Opposition to the Laurel

Save Laurel Way

Cut down 90 mature trees

o “Individual lot owners may require the removal of additional trees as the residences are developed” DEIR 3.3-20

o “unknown number of trees may be incidentally and adversely affected by various

activities during site construction” which may “result in the death of trees well after project completion” DEIR 3.3-20

Massive grading and filling

o More than 15,000 cubic yards of earth moved=1,500 dump trucks

o 6,000 cubic yards taken off-site=600 dump trucks

Page 5: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Save Laurel Way The City of Redwood City Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013 Comments in Opposition to the Laurel

Save Laurel Way

Convert 10-foot-wide dirt road into a 28-foot-wide, bi-level street + 16-foot retaining wall + 50-foot-wide cul-de-sac

Cover more than 50% of site with impervious surfaceso “Creating impervious area over approximately 50 percent of the

site will almost certainly decrease ground water recharge, reducing base flows in the stream channel within and downstream of the site. Ground-water flow paths may also be altered by the extensive cut and fill proposed, and by placement of subterranean structures. These issues will be assessed

at a later date in the CEQA document.” Storm Drainage Peer Review at 2.

At a minimum, five years of constant construction

Page 6: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Save Laurel Way The City of Redwood City Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013 Comments in Opposition to the Laurel

Save Laurel Way

The Project will convert this . . .

Page 7: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Save Laurel Way The City of Redwood City Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013 Comments in Opposition to the Laurel

. . . to this.

Save Laurel Way

Page 8: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Save Laurel Way The City of Redwood City Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013 Comments in Opposition to the Laurel

Save Laurel Way

Page 9: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Save Laurel Way The City of Redwood City Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013 Comments in Opposition to the Laurel

Save Laurel Way

Page 10: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Save Laurel Way The City of Redwood City Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013 Comments in Opposition to the Laurel

Save Laurel Way

Page 11: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Save Laurel Way The City of Redwood City Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013 Comments in Opposition to the Laurel

Save Laurel Way

Proposed Lots Are Steeply Sloped and Too Small

Page 12: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Save Laurel Way The City of Redwood City Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013 Comments in Opposition to the Laurel

Save Laurel Way

Commonly Owned Lots Must Be Merged

Page 13: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Save Laurel Way The City of Redwood City Planning Commission Hearing March 26, 2013 Comments in Opposition to the Laurel

Save Laurel Way