sil thbarcelona, june 11 , 2015 - · pdf filesil — thbarcelona, june 11 , 2015 w ork s...
TRANSCRIPT
Physical Internet
Pr. Eric Ballot
SIL — Barcelona, June 11th, 2015
workshop on e-Freight “Secure information based collaboration”
Venue day 1: SIL International Logistics & Material Handling Exhibition, Recinto de Montjuic - Plaza España, Fira de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Day 1: Thursday 11th June 2015
Time Cluster Workshop – Opening sessions
09:30 10:00 Registration and reception
10:00 11:00 Welcome speeches - Ramón García, CITET
- Marcel Huschebeck, PTV
11:00 11:40 Key note speeches:
Physical Internet
From CO2 to CO3:
making supply chain collaboration sustainable
Eric Ballot, MINES ParisTech
Frans Cruijsen, Argusi
Cluster Workshop – First session moderated by Dolores Herrero, ITENE
11:40 11:50 Introductions to BESTFACT cluster on e-Freight Roland Frindik, MARLO, cluster leader
11:50 12:50 How to get a successful shopping experience
Processes in mobility. The collaborative last mile
ICT and Electric Vehicles for Last Mile
Enrique Sánchez-Prieto, CRAMBO
Raico Luis, FIELDEAS
Arturo Pérez de Lucia, AEDIVE
12:50 14:20 Lunch
14:20 15:20 Palletways – Technology POD and PASS
Building Blocks Logistics
B2MOS – The Business to Motorways of the Sea
Jose Miguel Garcia, Palletways Iberia
Pieter van den Bold, Innovatrain
Adriana Diaz Alonso,
Escola Europea de Short Sea Shipping
15:20 15:40 Coffee and Tea Break
15:40 16.20 FREIGHT 4ALL Project - Italy-Spain Demonstrator
LogiCon: Improving service quality by involving small
transport operators in the electronic information exchange
Sean Deehan, Fundación Valenciaport
David Quesada, ENIDE
16:20 17:00 Panel Diskussion moderated by Dolores Herrero, ITENE
17:00 end of 1. day of the e-Freight workshop
17:00 19:00 possibility to visit the SIL Exhibition
20:30 Common dinner at Ca la Nuri Restaurant, Barcelona (directions below)
Agenda
2
• Efficiency and trends
• The Physical Internet concept
• Stakes and perspectives
E. Ballot June 11th 2015
Source: Centre for sustainable
transportation Canada
3
• Trends…
• Flow exponential growth
(even if they will not reach the sky)
• Shipments fragmentation
• Shipment median weight divided by 4,5
from 160 kg in 1988 to 30 kg in 2004 Source IFSTTAR 2013
• A no cost illusion for the consumers
• Expectations: better services and economic support to growth
E. Ballot June 11th 2015
Efficiency, trends and innovations
Efficiency, trends and innovations
How to take advantage of economy of scale when each shipment is going smaller?
How to mitigate the environmental effects? Decoupling / economic activity?
How to cope with the demand without new physical infrastructure?
4
• Huge dominance of freight road transport
• Fill rate and empty trip ratio difficult to improve
• Challenging goals
E. Ballot June 11th 2015
An incredible performance but with contradictions
Challenges and the Physical Internet concept
A call for new logistics
solutions
Truck overall efficiency (Food UK)
McKinnon, A., Y. Ge, and D. Leuchars, Analysis of
Transport Efficiency in the UK Food Supply Chain, L.R.
Centre and S.o.M.a. Languages, Editors. 2003:
Edinburgh. p. 38.
EU CO2
emissions targets
Challenges and the Physical Internet concept
5
Exemple de la superposition de deux réseaux
Definition
E. Ballot June 11th 2015
The Physical Internet is a hyperconnected
global logistics system enabling
seamless asset sharing and flow consolidation.
The Physical Internet is founded on
universal physical, digital, operational, business and legal interconnectivity
achieved through
standard open protocols, encapsulation, interfaces, certification,
performance assessment and monitoring.
B. Montreuil, R. D. Meller & E. Ballot, June 9th, 2015
www.physicalinternetinitiative.org
Physical trend A generalization of containerization: small and modular boxes, pallets footprint free
6
Montreuil, B., Meller, R. D. and Ballot, E. (2010). Towards a Physical Internet : the impact on logistics facilities and
material handling systems design and innovation. In: AL.,
K. G. E. (ed.) Progress in Material Handling Research.
Material Handling Industry of America
E. Ballot June 11th 2015
Expected physical impact
7
Cost evolution Source The
Box, HAROPA & JB Hunt
The benefit of handling standard: the twist lock example
E. Ballot June 11th 2015
8 E. Ballot June 11th 2015
Information could be more independent of logistics operators
Information management trend
• Information captured and exploited mainly locally in silos
• Structured information communication across organizations thanks to the Internet of
Things and new norms
Information management expected impact
9
Information flow
Be part of the Internet of Things
E. Ballot June 11th 2015
• All logistics assets could be
connected soon… thanks to the IoT
• We need
• communications technologies
• Standard to structure the data
• Workflows and applications
Logistics networks trend
10
Actual supply networks design
E. Ballot June 11th 2015
+
=
Two dedicated supply chains:
overlapping each other
DC of retail chain 1
DC of retail chain 2
Plant of manufacturer 1
WH of manufacturer 1
DC of retail chain 1
DC of retail chain 2
Plant of manufacturer 2
WH of manufacturer 2
Another supplier with 3
factories distributes via
2 warehouses to 10
regional distribution
centers of two
customers
A supplier with 3
factories distributes
via a central
warehouse 10
regional distribution
centers of two
customers
Expected impact on networks
11
Interconnected networks
E. Ballot June 11th 2015
+
=DC of retail chain 1
DC of retail chain 2
Plant of manufacturer 1
WH of manufacturer 1
DC of retail chain 1
DC of retail chain 2
Plant of manufacturer 2
WH of manufacturer 2
Another supplier with 3
factories distributes via
2 warehouses to 10
regional distribution
centers of two
customers
A supplier with 3
factories distributes
via a central
warehouse 10
regional distribution
centers of two
customers
An interconnected
network
Stakes and perspectives
12
“What if” we transfer shipments from supply networks to a “basic” version of the Physical Internet?
• Actual supply networks
Physical Internet Network
• A network of 47 hubs with hundreds
of transportation services
E. Ballot June 11th 2015
Stakes and perspectives
13
Cost reduction from -12% to -36% without changing inventory management
A simulation of a FMCG supply network in France
M€
E. Ballot June 11th 2015
An innovation platform
14
• Not a single warehouse… spread containers!
• 50 hubs in France with storage accessible to all
• And yet less inventory and transportation
• No shortage on the Internet!
• So many products stored and yet so often unavailable…
• A physical internet access provider for all
• It groups my deliveries, my shipments and knows me!
• A bonus when I announce my car journey
• I becomes a carrier of… goods containers!
• Invent your app!
E. Ballot June 11th 2015
Towards a consistent and standardized framework
15
Many dimensions to coordinate
E. Ballot June 11th 2015
• Logistics ecosystem components integration pitfalls
• The ITRS example
How to make Moore’s law?
An example of collaboration in the
semiconductor sector
Lack of physical interconnectivity
Heterogeneous pallet without
modular dimension
5
scaling. Technical progress was of course a key ingredient of this industry ability, but it
was not the only one: another key factor was the high degree of confidence, shared by the
industry players, that achieving Moore’s law was possible AND would bring the
expected benefits.
Fig. 1: The virtuous circle of the semiconductor industry
The ITRS is based on this industry-wide shared confidence of both the technical
feasibility and the economic validity of this virtuous cycle, as it is clearly stated in the
introduction to the ITRS executive summary: “a basic premise of the Roadmap has been that continued scaling of electronics would further reduce the cost per function […] and promote market growth for integrated circuits”.
Of course the ITRS is not the only mechanism that has been at work to achieve that
virtuous cycle. Nevertheless, it has had a strong prescriptive effect: not a single PhD
thesis in the field is written without positioning its research vs. the ITRS acknowledged
“roadblocks”. Likewise, funding agencies are also referring to the roadmap. The ITRS
has therefore been able to provide research guidance for the many actors of the
semiconductor ecosystem (semiconductor companies, equipment and material providers,
public and private research laboratories and institutes, and funding agencies), thereby
significantly contributing to technology exploration and at the same time increase resource efficiency in the very fast technological development of the industry. It should
also be stressed that the ITRS helped to synchronize the technology development and the
timely availability of manufacturing equipments and methods.
The literature on innovation management supports this view of the key role of a
global roadmapping process for the industry innovation capabilities. This literature
stresses that the success of an individual company depends critically on the “collective health of the organizations that influence the creation and delivery” of the firm
Better Performance/Cost
Transistor Scaling
Investment
Market Growth
European perspective: ALICE ETP
16
• The goal
• Efficiency gain by a factor 2 or 3!
• A more resilient network
• A better use of infrastructure
and means
• A call for innovation
• Obstacles
• Not urgent
• Too many standards
• New business models
• A lot of investments
Create a framework for a more consistent approach of logistics issues
E. Ballot June 2nd 2015
How to know more about it?
17
Recently published
• Research papers
• (E)-Books
– In English
• YouTube movies
E. Ballot June 11th 2015
Next time…
18
Efficacité global des camions
(Food UK)
A research center in China… Pr. George Q. Huang, end 2014
E. Ballot June 2nd 2015
19
Thank you
Québec, 2012-11-28, 76/76
Physical Internet Manifesto, version 1.11.1 Professor Benoit Montreuil, CIRRELT, Université Laval
Questions and comments are welcome,
and especially collaborative project avenues
www.physicalinternetinitiative.org
Twitter: @physicinternet
Pr. Eric Ballot
Mines ParisTech
60, boulevard Saint-Michel
75006 Paris – France
Tel: +33 1 40 51 90 97
Email: [email protected]
E. Ballot June 11th 2015