silicon photonics for data communications · caveats on silicon photonics • not cheap just...
TRANSCRIPT
ADOPT Winter School 2014 1
SILICON PHOTONICS FOR DATA COMMUNICATIONS
Gideon YoffeKaiam Corporation, California
Visitor at ICT, KTH Kista
• Introduction– Kaiam packaging technology– Data communication, Datacenters
• Silicon Photonics• Two possible commercial applications
– Multi-wavelength transmitters– Low-cost tunable lasers
• Conclusions
KAIAM: Use Si MEMS to build complex optical assemblies
4. Standard packaging and testing follows
2
1. Build a “PCB” using a silicon MEMS breadboard• simple low‐cost process, can be done
at many foundries
2. Depending on the PIC, bond components on the “PCB”• standard die‐bonding tools used for electronics
3. Micro‐machine optically connects the components • micro‐lenses move to maximize coupling,
micro‐heaters lock with solder• quick process, cheap tools, tolerant of
mechanical positioning errors and shifts
ADOPT Winter School 2014
Implementation of MEMS alignment
3
Shunt driver
Microlens
PLC upside‐down on spacer
Laser diodeMEMS bench
ADOPT Winter School 2014
4
MEMS alignment40Gb/s (4 x 10Gb/s) optical subassembly
All parts assembled using conventional tools,then aligned with MEMS and locked
PLC (upside down on spacer)
Shunt driver
laser
lens
Note: MEMS details not shown for simplicity
ADOPT Winter School 2014
5
Solder lock of MEMS structure1) On chip heater melts solder ball2) MEMS moves the lens into optimal
position. Tab is somewhere in solder ball
3) Heater is turned off, locking part in position
tab moves into solder ball
AuSn solder
buried Ni/Crheater
Air gap for thermal isolation
ADOPT Winter School 2014
6
Tolerance to die bonding error
• Lens adjustment compensates for initial non-optimal component placement
• 20um placement error ~< 0.6dB penalty
• MEMS design also demagnifiespost-solder shift
ADOPT Winter School 2014
7
Advantages of Kaiam approach
• Leverages generally available single-function components– No need to build complex monolithically integrated chips
• Much higher performance– Discrete chips can be optimized for high performance. Better than
monolithically integration, where material compromises must be made
• Very low development time and resources– For each Photonic Integrated Circuit, only a new “PCB” is needed
• Very high yield– Questionable parts can be tested / burned-in before assembly– Don’t have to reject the assembly because one part is bad
7Kaiam Corporation, ECOC 2012 WS09
Source: Independent Analyst Research and Cisco Analysis; Cisco Visual Networking IndexFrom Ori Gerstel, Cisco
Data use growing fast, but not revenue!
Telecom Revenue growth is limited (GDP based)
Internet traffic growth is high (30-100% CAGR)
0
30
60
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Exa
byt
es
pe
r mo
nth
MobilityBusiness InternetBusiness IP WANConsumer InternetConsumer IPTV/CATV
ADOPT Winter School 2014 8
Datacenters
ADOPT Winter School 2014 9
• Vast amount of data to/from datacenters
• 30000-50000 servers per datacenter
• Need power, cooling –
• Facebook set up in Luleå
Datacenter Interconnects
ADOPT Winter School 2014 10
Need layers of switches between servers
• Far more data travels within a datacenter than to/from a datacenter• A “search” might be sent to 1000+ servers• Many layers of switches required• Server-to-switch links now moving from 1Gb/s to 10Gb/s• Links between switches moving to 40Gb/s now, some to 100Gb/s
ADOPT Winter School 2014 11
Dreams for Integrated Silicon Photonics• Si electronic circuits perform switching (logic) of signals• Photonics is very appealing for, transport, routing of signals
– Fiber optics used first for long haul, now for shorter and shorter links
• Main cited application for silicon photonics is optical interconnect, chip-to-chip or on-chip
DARPAIBM
Near-term uses for Silicon Photonics• As electronics moves to 25Gb/s I/O, optical transceivers on “faceplate” will suffer.• Optics embedded on or very close to Si IC will be needed• Power dissipation from III-V’s would be a concern• Clear opportunity here for Si photonics chip, maybe with remote light source• For now, Si photonics chip likely to be separate from electronics
ADOPT Winter School 2014 12
ADOPT Winter School 2014 13
Silicon Photonics• Use CMOS line to make optical components, in silicon on insulator, 220nm thick• Foundries like imec, IME, have processes well controlled
– Offer multi-project wafers;circuits generally perform as expected!
Univ Delaware / Opsis /IME
Silicon Waveguide
• Very small optical mode, <0.5um• Very high refractive index contrast
– Silicon n=3.46– SiO2 n=1.46
• Very tight bends, tiny circuits possible• Output beam at facet very divergent, hard
to couple
ADOPT Winter School 2014 14
“High delta” Silica waveguide4um mode diameter
Single-mode fiber9um mode diameter
Waveguide Couplers, Splitters
ADOPT Winter School 2014 15
Y-branch
Multi-mode interference (MMI) device
Directional coupler, tap
1X2 2X2
Ring Resonators• Resonant coupling of light into a ring• Can resonantly couple out into a second waveguide
ADOPT Winter School 2014 16
B. Little MIT1997
Imec
through
drop
ADOPT Winter School 2014 17
AWG Arrayed Waveguide Gratings• Integrated optics device in silica or
other waveguides
• Used as mux or demux, channel spacing as low as 50GHz (0.4nm)
input guide
free-space regions
waveguide array, different lengths
output guides
ADOPT Winter School 2014 18
Silica, Silicon AWGSilica AWGTypically 20 X 30mm
Silicon AWG0.2 X 0.35mm
• Bend radius for silica ~few mm• Bend radius for silicon ~10um• Problem for Silicon – wavelength accuracy
– Thickness tolerance gives 10nm uncertainty
NTT
Optical Coupling - Edge• Direct attachment of single-mode fiber would give 20dB loss• Need to expand optical mode• Inverse taper, coupling to waveguide with effective index ~ 1.6, often polymer• Obtain 2-3um spot size, <1dB loss to lensed fiber or via a lens to SMF
– similar to coupling a laser diode to fiber
ADOPT Winter School 2014 19
U Gent
IBM
“CMOS compatible” edge coupler
• Some labs insist on only using CMOS processes – no polymer
• Can get good results with inverse taper alone, etched facet to control position of tip.
• But what does “CMOS compatible” really mean?
ADOPT Winter School 2014 20
Optical Coupling - Grating
• Grating couplers couple light out of a waveguide, into a fiber• Generally 10 degrees off vertical to break backward-forward symmetry and to
minimize back-reflections• Waveguide tapers out to 10um width to match single-mode fiber• Basic grating coupler gives about 25-30% coupling efficiency to fiber
ADOPT Winter School 2014 21
Advanced Grating Couplers
• With added complexity, still CMOS compatible, can achieve up to 70% coupling at peak, fairly broad spectrum
• Add poly-silicon overlay to break up-down symmetry
• “Apodize”, vary grating duty-cycle, to try to match output beam profile to fiber mode
ADOPT Winter School 2014 22
Luxtera
U Gent / Imec
Choice, Grating vs Edge Coupler?
ADOPT Winter School 2014 23
Parameter Grating Edge ChoiceCoupling efficiency
1.5dB loss to SMF 1dB to lensed fiber Edge
Optical Bandwidth
Typically 60nm 3dB, higher to smaller spot.
>100nm Edge
Back Reflections
~2%, very hard to eliminate. May require isolator.
<0.1% with good design Edge
Convenience Place coupler anywhere on chip. Full-wafer testing.
At edge only. Dicing and extra steps required.
Grating
CMOS compatibility
Standard process throughout
Non-standard steps required. Breaks metal guard ring.
Grating
Package cost /complexity
Low-cost custom component to turn beam.Large/selected spot size for easy alignment.
Standard geometry.Smaller spotsize requires more precise alignment.
Tie
ADOPT Winter School 2014 24
Active Devices: Refractive index Change
• Index change through free-carriers, “plasma effect”, known since 1987• ∆n can be 0.001 for doping 1E18/cm^3, but depletion region width small compared
to waveguide so effect on mode is small– very weak effect for micron-scale waveguides
• Holes give bigger effect than electrons, with lower loss• Some accompanying free-carrier absorption
Carrier density change:reverse biased pn diode
• Change depletion region size in pn diode• For given reverse bias V, doping density N,
very roughly:• Depletion region width ~ 1/√N• No. of carriers moved, modal index change ~ √N• Length for pi phase shift ~ 1/√N• Capacitance/unit length ~ √N• Absorption/unit length ~N
• Higher N gives:• Shorter modulator for pi phase shift• Little change in capacitance• Higher absorption loss
• Tradeoff length for loss through doping, little effect on speed ~0.4um
Depletion region at pn junction, due to drift/diffusion
ADOPT Winter School 2014 25
ADOPT Winter School 2014 26
Silicon Modulators - Ring• Shift transmission resonance by applied signal
• Very compact, fast
• Very temperature-sensitive, 0.07nm/deg C
• Need active tuning
• Not suitable for low-cost uncooled applications
Sun/ Kotura
ADOPT Winter School 2014 27
Silicon Mach-Zehnder Modulators• Amplitude modulation through refractive
index change in one path of an interferometer
• Operates over wide wavelength range
• Not too sensitive to temperature
• Doesn’t need active tuning
• Better suited to communications, but bigger than ring resonator From IMEC
ADOPT Winter School 2014 28
Depletion width, Capacitance vs Voltage
• Index change ~N (doping level), depletion width ~1/sqrt(N)• Higher doping gives bigger modal index change, phase shift, but higher capacitance• Note depletion region, where action takes place, ~0.1um wide
Capacitance, Depletion Width vs Voltage3mm long, doping level 1E18/cm^3
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Reverse bias (Volts)
Junc
tion
capa
cita
nce,
pF
0
0.025
0.05
0.075
0.1
0.125
0.15
Dep
letio
n re
gion
wid
th,
umcapacitance
IMEC data
depletion w idth
From S. Sze, “Semiconductor Devices”
ADOPT Winter School 2014 29
Phase shift vs Voltage
• Calculate change of mode effective index with voltage, through overlap of changing depletion region width
• Calculate phase shift
• Vpi = 9.7V
• Vpi.L = 14.5V.mm
• Capacitance at 0V = 0.7pF
• Simulations, data agree, despite simple 1-D model
Phase Shift, Capacitance vs Voltage1.5mm long, doping 1E18/cm^3
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Reverse bias (Volts)
Phas
e sh
ift (r
adia
ns)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Cap
acita
nce
(pF)
Phase shift
Capacitance
ADOPT Winter School 2014 30
Mach-Zehnder Modulator Operation• The available refractive index change in silicon is fairly small, so modulation is not
very efficient.
• Vπ.L product around 26V.mm for good high-speed devices
• With 3mm long device, push-pull, can get decent extinction ratio with 2-3V swing
MZM output, Vpi.L=26Vmm, L=3mm, push-pull
0
0.020.04
0.06
0.080.1
0.12
0.140.16
0.18
0 1 2 3 4 5 6V
Out
put i
nten
sity
2Vp-p
ADOPT Winter School 2014 31
Modulator Performance• With “lumped” electrodes, speed limited to about 10Gb/s for good extinction ratio
– direct tradeoff of phase shift and capacitance with doping
• Traveling-wave electrodes get past RC limitations, used for all 25Gb/s applications
• But electrode characteristic impedance typically ~30 ohms, due to capacitance
• On-chip modulator insertion loss typically ~5dB– Mostly due to P/N doping in phase-shifters
• All published data has been at 1550nm. IMEC, Opsis/IME, now starting 1310nm
From IMEC modulator multi-project wafer run announcement.
ADOPT Winter School 2014 32
Integrated Light Source for Silicon• Silicon diodes do not emit
light, unlike GaAs, InP
• No easy integrated light source
• Some hero experiments showing light emission without III-V:– “Porous silicon”, 1990’s
– Strained Ge, GeSn, on Si
– Thulium Silicates
optically-pumped lasing of strained Ge on SiMIT, Gp IV Photonics Meeting 2012
ADOPT Winter School 2014 33
Hybrid-Integrated Light Source• Wafer bonding
– UCSB, Intel– Inefficient laser, poor confinement in
gain region– Thermal problems – SiO2
• 40 deg/W for 800um laser– Yield questions
• Epitaxial InP on Silicon– S. Lourdudoss, KTH– Very appealing– Looks very difficult
passive
active
ADOPT Winter School 2014 34
Caveats on Silicon Photonics
• Not cheap just because it’s silicon– Expensive mask set, process, don’t have volume
• Performance of devices is mediocre– Losses higher than SiO2, InP– Electro-optic effects weaker than in InP, simpler physics– Detector (Ge) efficiency 0.5 to 0.7A/W, while InGaAs is close to 1A/W
• No easy light source• Optical coupling is difficult• Real benefits expected when integrated with electronic circuitry
– But generally photonics not made on same CMOS line as top-end electronics– Beware power consumption/heating
Application 1: 4 wavelength transmitter design exercise• 10Gb/s datacenter links moving to 40Gb/s, QSFP package, 4 lanes at 10Gb/s each• Short reach using 850nm VCSEL’s, 4 parallel multimode fibers, up to 100~300m• For longer reach use 4 wavelengths multiplexed onto single-mode fiber• Use directly-modulated semiconductor lasers, uncooled to save power• Standard is 20nm channel spacing: 1270, 1290, 1310, 1330nm.
ADOPT Winter School 2014 35
PLC (upside down on spacer)
Shunt driver
laser
lens
Note: MEMS details not shown for simplicity
Existing Kaiam 4X10Gb/s optical sub-assembly for QSFP transceiver for 10km link
ADOPT Winter School 2014 36
4 channel eyes from QSFP TOSA
Luxtera Silicon short-reach version
ADOPT Winter School 2014 37
• Single laser diode as light source, split between 4 modulators• Silicon photonics integrated with drivers – nice for distributed travelling wave drive• Sold in “Active Optical Cable”, short links, 4 single-mode optical fibers, 10Gb/s each.• Maybe cheap in volume for short distance, but ribbon fiber, termination expensive• Customers often prefer connectorized transceivers.
Silicon for Next-Gen 100Gb/s• Now we need to plan for 4X25Gb/s, for 100Gb/s link.• Strong preference for uncooled operation to save electric power• Not clear that directly modulated semiconductor lasers can give 25Gb/s at high T• Interest in using Silicon Photonics to generate the 25Gb/s signals
– Modulators + Multiplexer, tap waveguides to monitor laser power• How good a chip can we make in a multi-project wafer run, e.g. at IMEC?
ADOPT Winter School 2014 38
Si Chip
Mux
Mod
Mod
Mod
Mod
CW Lasers
Output fiber
det
det
det
det
ADOPT Winter School 2014 39
Modulators with MMI splittersLayout in “Fimmprop”
apply index modulation
zero modulation: quadrature
pi/2 modulation: output high
-pi/2 modulation: output low
MZM output, Vpi.L=26Vmm, L=3mm, push-pull
0
0.020.04
0.06
0.080.1
0.12
0.140.16
0.18
0 1 2 3 4 5 6V
Out
put i
nten
sity
quadrature
Estimated Loss Budget• Estimate losses from foundry guidance, to see how much laser power we need• We want about 0dBm, or 1mW average power per wavelength in the output fiber• For the current design, we need laser power 27dBm,=500mW!!!• Totally impractical. Need to be able to run off 30mW lasers, maximum• Output grating coupler is a big contributor because of 60+nm wavelength range
– Good edge couplers will save up to 8dB, but we still need more savings elsewhere.
ADOPT Winter School 2014 40
Item Loss dB Comments
Input coupler 4
Grating coupler specified 2.5dB loss to SMF;additional loss transforming laser mode to SMF. Use edge coupler when available
MZM insertion loss 5 Mostly due to doping of phase shifters
MZM modulation loss 4For low voltage operation will need to bias with some loss at "1" level
Passive waveguide loss 1 Loss is 1.5 to 2.5dB/cm in undoped waveguideMux loss 4 AWGTaps 1 Taps on input guides to monitor optical powerOutput coupler 8 Limited bandwidth of grating. Want edge coupler!Total losses 27
Feasibility of Si Photonics
• Well-characterized building blocks through most of the design• Modulators should give about 15GHz bandwidth, able to achieve 6dB extinction
ratio• Uncertainty of precise silicon thickness leads to wavelength uncertainty
– Multiplexer, grating wavelengths can easily be wrong by up to 10nm
• Losses will be quite high, over 20dB from laser chip to output fiber– Would need an optical amplifier in order to measure “eye diagrams”
• Chip would not be good enough to make a product• Could be used for lab demonstrations and investigations of silicon photonics• Performance is always improving as the foundries tune their processes and designs• Maybe the concept can be practical in 2-3 years.
ADOPT Winter School 2014 41
ADOPT Winter School 2014 42
Example 2: Tunable laser for WDM fiber-to-the-home
• Bandwidth demand in the “last mile” is pushing interest in WDM fiber-to-the-home
• Many architectures use tunable transceiver at end user
• Requires very low-cost tunable laser
TX/RX 32
TX/RX 5
TX/RX 4
TX/RX 3
TX/RX 2
TX/RX 1
Central Office
Homes,
Labs,
Companies
Commercial Tunable Lasers
• Integrated devices dominate in compact tunable transmitter market
• Complex, large InP chips – too expensive
ADOPT Winter School 2014 43
Syntune
JDSU
ADOPT Winter School 2014 44
Kaiam Tunable Laser• Exploit silicon photonics: integrate tunable filter function into silicon
• Couple to external InP gain chip
• Package can be very compact, cheap
• Kaiam performed proof-of-concept demonstration, reported at OFC 2012.Silicon PLC prism lens InP gain chip
Proposed TO-style package
ADOPT Winter School 2014 45
PLC tunable reflectors
• Vernier tuning of two sets of reflection peaks
• Silicon tuning ~ 0.07nm per deg C
• Thermally tuned micro-ring resonators, diameter ~50um
Vernier tuning with ring resonators
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1530 1535 1540 1545 1550
wavelength
inte
nsity Ring 1
Ring 2
gain chip
PLC reflector with micro‐ring resonators
grating coupler
heaters
ADOPT Winter School 2014 46
Custom PLC’s in Sub-Micron SOI• PLC’s, 900X300um, were fabricated to our design on 193nm 8-inch CMOS line
– SOI 0.25um thick, waveguide width ~0.5um
– Near-normal incidence grating couplers for 70% coupling
Bragg grating
grating coupler heater electrodes
1. Rings in loop configuration
2. Rings in series, Bragg mirror for return path
Kaiam, OFC 2012
ADOPT Winter School 2014 47
Tunable Reflection spectra• Measured using broadband SLD source and a fiber-optic circulator
• Envelope of spectrum corresponds to grating coupler and SLD, each 40-50nm FWHM
Thermally tuned reflection spectra Heat applied to one ring only
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1510 1520 1530 1540 1550
Wavelength (nm)
Ref
lect
ed p
ower
(a.u
.)
0mw5mw11mw18mw
ADOPT Winter School 2014 48
Lasing Results 1. Spectra
• Lab bench external-cavity laser using ring-resonator PLC coupled via lens to AR/cleaved gain chip (Alphion)
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
1520 1530 1540 1550 1560 1570 1580
Wavelength (nm)
dB
ADOPT Winter School 2014 49
Lasing Results 2. Fine tuning
• Align two rings by heating one, then apply heat to both to tune the whole spectrum
• Lasing mode stays on aligned peaks
Fine tuning
00.20.40.60.8
11.21.4
0 25 50 75 100 125
Thermal tuning power (mW)
Wav
elen
gth
shift
(nm
)
ADOPT Winter School 2014 50
Lasing Results 3. L-I
• Rings tuned for efficient lasing on one peak
• Achieve desired 5mW facet power
Output power
01234567
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
SOA current (mA)
Out
put p
ower
(mW
)
ADOPT Winter School 2014 51
Lasing Results 4. Modulation
• Directly modulate gain chip with square-wave
• Rise/fall times 200-250ps, adequate for 1.25Gb/s
• Speed limited by gain chip design – intended for DC drive
ADOPT Winter School 2014 52
Path Forward• Efficiency can be improved by optimization of gain chip for application:
– Threshold - MQW BH vs wide ridge with bulk active
– Slope efficiency - Low-reflectance front facet vs as-cleaved
• Improvements also from optimization of PLC, coupling
Simulated Efficiency Improvements
02
468
10
121416
1820
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
Current (mA)
Pow
er (m
W)
presentOptimize gain chip onlyImprove PLC also
ADOPT Winter School 2014 53
Conclusions
• Silicon photonics offer possible path to low-cost optical data links
• Many functions available – modulators, detectors, filters, multiplexers …
• Chips are made in well-characterized CMOS fabs, so they generally behave as expected
• Light source needs to be in another material
• Challenges – optical coupling, high loss
• Commercial possibilities for datacenter interconnect and fiber-to-the-home
• Not easy, even if it is Silicon!