silvia ochesanu thomas maes, hans van havermaet university of antwerpen october 26, 2007
DESCRIPTION
CASTOR TRIGGER STUDY. Silvia Ochesanu Thomas Maes, Hans Van Havermaet University of Antwerpen October 26, 2007. Outline. Background rate and signal efficiency Drell –Yan process Forward jets Rapidity Gap with CASTOR/HF. Conclusions. Generator study. Why a generator study? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu1
Silvia OchesanuThomas Maes, Hans Van Havermaet
University of Antwerpen October 26, 2007
CASTOR TRIGGER STUDY
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu2
Outline
• Background rate and signal efficiency
– Drell –Yan process
– Forward jets
• Rapidity Gap with CASTOR/HF.
• Conclusions
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu3
Generator studyWhy a generator study?
• CASTOR simulation in CMSSW was completed October 9th, 2007
and was not available for this study
Is a generator level study good enough?
– the jet rate obtained by a generator level version of the L1 jet finding
algorithm is very similar to that presented in the CMS L1 Trigger TDR
→we can rely on the additional rate reduction provided by rapidity gap
conditions
– the CASTOR energy resolution is very good:
• resolution of 1 readout unit: σE ≈ 10 → 20 GeV for E = 0 → 5000 GeV
→the effect of smearing across the trigger threshold will be limited
– problem: electromagnetic/hadronic energy separation
→a simulation study is still needed
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu4
if x- ≪ x+ → access to low-xBjorken proton structure;
→ at LHC (for Q 1 GeV and ≳ η = 8): xBjorken 10-8≳
→ xBjorken decreases by factor 10 for each 2 units in rapidity
Drell Yan Process
p
p
l+
l-
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu5
CASTOR cherenkov calorimeter● Electromagnetic and hadronic sections● 16-fold segmentation in φ● 2(em)+12(had)-fold segmentation in z(readout units within one φ-sector will be grouped together for the trigger)● No segmentation in η
CASTOR Detector
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu6
Monte Carlo Generator
• PYTHIA(6.402) used in standard mode (CTEQ 5M1 pdf)
– background: minimum bias QCD (MSEL = 2)
= 101.4 mb
– signal:
● select Drell Yan process (electron –positron pairs) channel, switching off gamma decays to anything except e+e-;
= 88.19 nb (2.6 nb with e+e- in CASTOR)
~ 26 million events for 10 fb-
● QCD jets (MSEL = 1)
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu7
Level 1 Trigger variables
Definition of the variables:• Electromagnetic energy :e+, e- and • Hadronic energy :energy sum of other particles• Hits (yes/no): charged particles present
All variables calculated in 16 azimuthal segments
Additional variables can be used (HLT/offline) to reduces the background:• charged multiplicity• theta , phi of charged particles• invariant mass of lepton pair
Trigger :
Ask for energy deposit in the electromagnetic part of CASTOR above threshold in combination with a veto for energy deposits in the hadronic part of the calorimeter.
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu8
Drell Yan :background rate (L=1032cm-2s-1)
L1 condition:• 2 φ-sector with Eem>E0● Eem > 300 GeV ~ 30kHz● Eem > 600 GeV ~ 0.6 kHz
Additional conditions:• + hadronic energy <5 GeV; ~ 3kHz ~ 0.07kHz• +At least one charged particle (hits) in T2 in front of electromagnetic segment <0.01kHz
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu9
Drell Yan :background rate (L=1033cm-2s-1)
L1 condition:• 2 φ-sector with Eem>E0
● Eem > 300 GeV ~ 3000kHz
● Eem > 600 GeV ~ 80 kHz
Additional conditions:• + hadronic energy <5 GeV;
~60kHz
~1kHz• At least one charged particle
(hits) in T2 in front of
electromagnetic segment
<0.01kHz
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu10
Drell Yan :signal efficiency
-> 20% efficienty in xBj< 5 x 10-7 for DY (no pile -up)-> lower efficiency in xBj for pile –up events
L1 condition:2 φ-sector with Eem>E0
● Eem > 300 GeV ● Ehad < 5 GeV
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu11
Lower threshold to study thenature of background processes (-> high rates)
• Elastic and diffractive processes hardly contribute
• Background comes from QCD 2->2 processes, mostly gg ->gg
• Background consist of forward
energetic π0 in coincidence with acharged hadron
Background study
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu12
qg → qg gg → gg
Forward jets are mainly produced through:
● Total cross section for events withhighest ET jet in CASTOR (from PYTHIA):
465 μb
● Trigger: ask for large hadronic energy deposit
Forward jets
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu13
Forward jets: background rate
● L1 condition:
− 1 calorimeter with Etot>E0
− 2-3 adjacent φ-sectors with Etot>E0
● O(1kHz) rate possible for Etot > 3000 GeV
(corresponding to ET 15GeV)≳● further strategies to be
studied (e.g. For HLT)
− require highest ET jet to be in CASTOR
− cut on maximum ET of central jets
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu14
Forward jets: signal rangexBj distribution for events with highest ET jet (ET>5 GeV) in CASTOR:
● Weak correlation between highest ET jet rapidity and xBj● Efficiency study suffers from low statistics
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu15
Rapidity Gap
● Diffractive production of jets:
pp → p jet jet p
→ possible to trigger on ET >40 GeV
dijets with proton tag in L1 trigger
[CMS Note-2007/002]
● No proton tags available on L1 in 2008
→ need for single/double gap triggers
with CASTOR and/or HF
→ check L1 jet rates on
generator level 2.4 kHz for dijets
with |η| < 2.5 and ET > 40 GeV
( 2.6 kHz CMS Note-2007/002)
L = 1032 cm-2 s-1
→ multiply rate by 10!
1-jet
2-jet
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu16
Level 1 condition:• 2 jets with |η| < 2.5 and ET > 40 GeV) ;• Etot (single sided HF/CASTOR) < E0);
Single Rapidity Gap (dijet+gap)
with CASTOR/HF
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu17
Level 1 condition:• 2 jets with |η| < 2.5 and ET > 40 GeV) ;• Etot (single sided HF/CASTOR) < E0);
Double Rapidity Gap with CASTOR/HFgap+dijet+gap
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu18
Conclusions• generator study of L1 rate and efficiencies for Drell –Yan , forward jets at
large Δη, single and double hard diffraction
• Several trigger strategies are feasible using CASTOR alone• Additional information from T2 can reduce L1 trigger rates
• Still a lot of problem with background• Full simulation study is need it
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu19
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu20
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu21