sim4life & functionalized anatomical modelssim4life & functionalized anatomical models: mri...
TRANSCRIPT
Sim4Life & Functionalized Anatomical Models:MRI Safety, Thermal Therapies, and Neurostimulation
IT’IS Computational Life Sciences Group
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Introduction
• advances in imaging and simulation technology permit the generation of functionalized (personalized) patient models
• this opens novel and powerful possibilities in:- device & therapy innovation- personalized medicine & treatment
planning- in silico clinical trials
(safety & effectivity assessment)- …
• Sim4Life is a computational life sciences platform optimized for the modeling physical and physiological/biological process in and around the human body
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Solvers
physics
• electro-magnetics
• thermodynamics
• acoustics
• fluid dynamics
• CRD
• (mechanics
tissue models
• neuronal dynamics
• perfusion models
• tissue damage / growth models
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
High Performance Computing
• (multi-)GPU HW
acceleration
• MPI/OMP parallelization
(clusters, supercomp.…)
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
FUNCTIONALIZED ANATOMICAL MODELS
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Medical Image Data (MRI)
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Virtual Population
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Parameterization for Comprehensive Coverage
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Morphing for Personalization
Thelonious TheloniousObese ChildObese Child
• surface-based (ICP) / image-based (registration) / physics-based (biomechanical)
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Images Provide more than Anatomy: MHD
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Images Provide more than Anatomy: MHD
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
High Resolution MIDA Head Model (0.5mm, 160 struct.)
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Images Provide more than Anatomy : TACS
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Images Provide more than Anatomy : TACS
Multiscale: Top-Down
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Neuronal Excitability: Anysotropy, Timing, Location
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
30
210
60
240
90
270
120
300
150
330
180 0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
30
210
60
240
90
270
120
300
150
330
180 0
-5
0
5
-6-4-202460
1
2
3
4
5
6
-5
0
5
-6-4-202460
1
2
3
4
5
6
Monopolar Pulse
Bipolar Pulse
q
𝐸
q
𝐸
q
q
-4
-2
0
2
4
-5-4
-3-2
-10
1
-1
0
1
2
3
4
-4
-2
0
2
4
-4-2
02
4
-1
0
1
2
3
4
𝐸q
φ
φ
φ
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Multiscale Modeling
Single-Cell In-Situ
Monophasic
Biphasic
10 Hz
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Neuronal Excitability: Anysotropy, Timing, Location
Complete Tr<0,75 0,75<Tr<1,25 Tr>1,25
Complete Tr<0,75 0,75<Tr<1,25 Tr>1,25
Biphasic
Monophasic
Cathodic
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Stimulation Localization & Timing
Monophasic Biphasic
1,8
[ms]
0,5
100
[ms]
0
Exci
tabi
lity
0,5 [ms]
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Field / Stimulation: Correlation
Ba
ll a
nd
Sti
ck
CA
1
R2=0,9998
R2=0,9997
R2=0,6859
R2=0,7478
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Image-Based Functionalization: Neurons with DTI
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
MRI Gradient Coil Safety
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
EM Induced Neuron Stimulation – Results
SENN22 SENN37 & SENN(T)
end-node center-type
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
EM Induced Neuron Stimulation – Results • calculated peak gradient coil E-field (in fat & overall), dB/dt comparable to
previously reported values [Turk2012, So2004];slightly higher as expected due to increased resolution & detail [So2004]
• onset of stimulation slightly above realistically occurring switching rates
• end- and center-type stimulation occur at similar thresholds
‣ E-field not sole criterium
• potential distribution along nerve has influence on stimulation threshold
• local foci occur and matter
• detailed motor neuron model has in some cases lower threshold than SENN
• temperature strongly affects dynamics, but only minimally threshold (<20% except for very short pulses)
• neuron trajectory should be smoothed to avoid falsely lowering predicted stimulation onset, but
• field smoothing should be avoided
• dielectric contrast at tissue interfaces related issues are naturally handled (sampling by nodes)
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
PERSONALIZED MEDICINE: THERMAL THERAPIES
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Thermal Therapies
• hyperthermic oncology (aims at >42C, benefits shown at 40-42C)
• ablation (55 - >100C)
Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Personalized Treatment Planning
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Novel Applicator, Design&QA&TP by Modeling
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Superparamagnetic Nano-Particle HT
Multiscale:
Bottom-Up
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Thermal Modeling: From Physics to Physiology
• based on widely employed Pennes Bioheat Equation
• extensions:- coupling to 1D vessel networks to account for directivity & discreteness of
blood flow (increased accuracy & x100 acceleration)- local thermoregulation (vasodilation & vascular shut-down)- coupling to whole body thermoregulation model- accounting for body core temperature increase- supporting MR perfusion maps & MR flow field
maps (personalization)
• for high T (ablation): evaporation, rehydration, coagulation
Multiscale:
Hybrid/Parallel
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Treatment Effect on Tumor Evolution
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
IN SILICO CLINICAL TRIALS:MRI IMPLANTATE SICHERHEIT
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
The Problem: MRI Implant Safety
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
AIMD Expositionssicherheitsabklärung
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
in vivo RF Feldverteilung: Populationsabdeckung
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Trajektorienabdeckung
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Kombination
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Kombination
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Statistische Auswertung
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Auszug aus der Unsicherheitsanalyse
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Auszug aus der Unsicherheitsanalyse
Neufeld, et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 54 (2009) 4151–4169
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Verification & Validation
Method of Manufactured Solutions, benchmarks, published data, measurements
- sharp contrasts
- anisotropic tensorial conductivity
- conductivity inhomogeneity
- source term inhomogeneity
- pulse shape
- stimulation thresholds(center-type and end-node stimulation)
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Patch Clamp Measurements
ax
on
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Neuroprosthetics: Selective Muscle Activation
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Verification & Quality Assurance• documented solver&algorithm verification (available for regulatory purposes)
- following standards where available (e.g., IEC/IEEE 62704-1 for EM FDTD)
• automated test suit running nightly on large number of systems, unit tests
• quality assurance measures:- e.g., cross-checking & external expert review for ViP models, - automated checks (e.g., change of tissue property values, organ weight)- requirements & checklists & guidance documents
• bug & feature tracking system, version control
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Torso Phantom and Model
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Generic (FDA) Implant
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
In Vivo Heating
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Validation: Gamma Method & GUM
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
CONCLUSIONS
Visit, Prof. Snedeker November 24th,.2016
Conclusions• advances in imaging, HPC, and computational life sciences permit
computable, functionalized anatomical phantoms
• these have been successfully applied for:- device & therapy innovation- personalized medicine & treatment planning- in silico clinical trials
(safety & effectivity assessment)
• requires:
- image-based generation of personalized / population-covering models
- (image-based) functionalization (properties, BC, dynamics)
- simulating physical interactions with living tissue within complex, inhomogeneous anatomy
- modeling induced physiological/biological impact
- identification of optimal therapy, worst-case configuration
- quantification of confidence interval & V&V