simulated radar measurements in nwp-model validation carl fortelius

19
02/10/02 1 Simulated radar measurements in NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius Finnish Meteorological Institute

Upload: ronia

Post on 08-Jan-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Simulated radar measurements in NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius Finnish Meteorological Institute. Contents: 1. What are simulated radar measurements 2. Why are they needed 3. What do they tell. Special thanks to: Günther Haase and DWD for the RSM code Harri Hohti for radar data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Simulated radar measurements in NWP-model validation

Carl ForteliusFinnish Meteorological Institute

Page 2: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Contents:

1. What are simulated radar measurements

2. Why are they needed

3. What do they tell

Page 3: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Special thanks to:

Günther Haase and DWD for the RSM code

Harri Hohti for radar data

Sami Niemelä for Hirlam output

Page 4: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

3D NWP model output:T, q, hydrometeors

Page 5: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Volume backscatteringcoefficient (Mie)

3D NWP model output:T, q, hydrometeors

Page 6: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Radar ray propagation,extinction

Volume backscatteringcoefficient (Mie)

3D NWP model output:T, q, hydrometeors

Page 7: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Radar ray propagation,extinction

Volume backscatteringcoefficient (Mie)

Simulated measurements:PPI, RHI,statistics,...

3D NWP model output:T, q, hydrometeors

Page 8: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Example: Comparing two parameterizations of convectionand moist physics in HIRLAM

Page 9: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Example: Comparing two parameterizations of convectionand moist physics in HIRLAM

Model: HIRLAM 5.0.0Resolution: 40 levels, 5.5 kmExperiments (Sami Niemelä, Univ. Helsinki):

HHS: Reference version HHK: ''STRACO'' replaced by ''RKKF''

Boundaries & initial state: FMI operational analyses (31 levels, 22 km)

Page 10: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Example: Comparing two parameterizations of convectionand moist physics in HIRLAM

Model: HIRLAM 5.0.0Resolution: 40 levels, 5.5 kmExperiments (Sami Niemelä, Univ. Helsinki):

HHS: Reference version HHK: ''STRACO'' replaced by ''RKKF''

Boundaries & initial state: FMI operational analyses (31 levels, 22 km)

Radars: Gematronik 5.6 GHz, Sigmet signal processingVantaa, Ikaalinen, Anjalankoski

Page 11: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Analysis 25 May 2001 12 UTC

Model domain and composite area

Page 12: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Page 13: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Page 14: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Page 15: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Page 16: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Page 17: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Page 18: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Page 19: Simulated radar measurements in  NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius

02/10/02 1

Conclusions

NWP-models produce realistic(?) reflectivity distributions

RSM only (?) way to verify vertically distributed hydrometeors

RSM brings out differences between alternative model formulationswhen traditional methods fail

RSM is computationally demanding