simulation project organization update & review of recommendations gabriele cosmo, cern/ph-sft ...

11
Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT http://lcgapp.cern.ch/project/simu Application Area Internal Review September 19 th , 2006

Upload: juliet-carr

Post on 23-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT  Application Area Internal

Simulation ProjectOrganization update & review of recommendations

Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT

http://lcgapp.cern.ch/project/simu

Application Area Internal Review

September 19th, 2006

Page 2: Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT  Application Area Internal

AA Internal Review , Sep 2006 Slide 2

Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT

Simulation Project

Simulation framework Interface to multiple simulation engines (Geant4, Fluka) and geometry

models exchange (GDML), MC truth handling, Python interfaces Geant4 team participating

Aligned with and responding to needs from LHC experiments, physics validation, simulation framework

Fluka team participating Framework integration, physics validation

Garfield team participating Garfield package integration and support in LCG - SPI

Simulation physics validation Assess adequacy of simulation and physics environment for LHC and

provide the feedback to drive needed improvements Generator services

Generator libraries; validation/test suite; development when needed (HepMC, etc.); common event files

WitoldPokorski

JohnApostolakis

AlfredoFerrari

AlbertoRibon

WitoldPokorskias of 15-Sep-06

RobVeenhof

Page 3: Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT  Application Area Internal

AA Internal Review , Sep 2006 Slide 3

Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT

Project Organization

Simulation Project Leader

Framework

WPWP

WP

Geant4

WPWP

WP

Fluka

WPWP

PhysicsValidation

WPWP

WP

GeneratorServices

WPWP

Subprojects

Work packages

Geant4Project

FlukaProject

ExperimentValidation MC4LHC

Garfield

WPWP

Page 4: Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT  Application Area Internal

AA Internal Review , Sep 2006 Slide 4

Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT

Recommendations 2005 review – generator services

“The size of the complete GENSER package is becoming too big to be handled efficiently. Therefore the review recommends introducing more granular packaging options for distribution”

A modular way for downloading also individual MC packages has been introduced since release 1.2.0 of GENSER. A Python script allows for the selection and automatic download from the Web

“The situation with HepMC is still unclear and needs to be re-evaluated once the new release is used in production by all experiments”

HepMC has been agreed as the file format for the production of common generator particle-level event files. It is also adopted for later stages in simulation and reconstruction

Since January 2006 the HepMC package is released and maintained among the external packages in the LCG AFS area, now released and distributed independently. Lynn Garren (FNAL) has joined the effort undertaking the support for HepMC. HepMC is now organised in the context of LCG and a dedicated Savannah portal is set

From the future version of HepMC (2.X), the package will become a standalone product with no external dependencies

Agreement among experiments to consider the standalone HepMC as the reference version

Page 5: Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT  Application Area Internal

AA Internal Review , Sep 2006 Slide 5

Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT

Recommendations 2005 review – physics validation - 1

“A continuing common effort together with the experiments to validate the packages against test beam data and simple benchmark processes ”

Results from test-beam setups of 2004 have been obtained and presented (ATLAS, CMS) others are expected soon (ATLAS)

New releases of Geant4 are promptly validated against test-beam data (ATLAS-HEC); such process has been established since 2005

“Continuation of the Fluka validation, especially of the hadronic physics” Milestones for simple benchmarks and test-beam setups are defined and

in advanced state. Fluka and Geant4 are the MC engines being verified “To install a central repository for the validation results”

The code repository for the simple benchmarks is in place and populated. For the test-beam setups, work is in progress for correcting the data from instrumental effects and allow their use for standalone validation

Page 6: Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT  Application Area Internal

AA Internal Review , Sep 2006 Slide 6

Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT

Recommendations 2005 review – physics validation - 2

“To revisit together with the experiments the effect on systematic uncertainties for future measurements, due to the present simulation uncertainties, as observed by the ongoing validation studies”

These evaluations are undergoing in the experiments. Considerable effort has been put and is still ongoing for understanding, improving and verifying the hadronic shower shapes

Concern: “The reduction in manpower of 2.3 to 0.8 FTE in the physics validation of Geant4 is very worrying. If Geant4 can argue that this is essentially a CERN responsibility we recommend that the LCG tries to improve the manpower situation”

The average manpower in the last 12 months has been of 2.3 FTE, which corresponds to the current figure

Manpower projection for the next 6 months: 1.9 FTE

Page 7: Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT  Application Area Internal

AA Internal Review , Sep 2006 Slide 7

Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT

Concerns 2005 review – simulation framework

“Concern that the subproject is carried by less than one FTE. In the long run this may be insufficient ”

The project has been reinvigorated with new manpower during 2006 reaching an average of 1.3 FTE in the past 12 months and currently at 1.8 FTE

Helped to successfully achieve most of the milestones assigned to the Project

Manpower projection for the next 9 months: 1.4 FTE

Page 8: Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT  Application Area Internal

AA Internal Review , Sep 2006 Slide 8

Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT

Recommendations 2005 review – Fluka

“FLUKA installation together with source code should be made available very soon”

“Distribution of FLUKA should make use of the SPI tools, like other AA related software products”

The source code of Fluka is available to CERN and INFN researchers since July 2005. The source of the most recent release (fluka2006.3) will be open to all scientific Institutions

AFS space has been setup for the installation of the Fluka package in the LCG area

The most recent version of Fluka (2006.3) will be soon installed

Page 9: Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT  Application Area Internal

AA Internal Review , Sep 2006 Slide 9

Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT

Recommendations 2005 review – Geant4

“Any concerns on the validity of the physics results should be brought forward in the validation subproject ”

Feedback for validation studies done in the experiments is reported in the Physics Validation meetings monthly organised by the Physics Validation subproject in coordination with the physics validation responsibles in the experiments

Page 10: Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT  Application Area Internal

AA Internal Review , Sep 2006 Slide 10

Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT

Simulation Project major Milestones : 2005-2007 2005/02: VD502 - Review/prioritization os simple benchmarks for physics validation 2005/05: VD508 - First results of background radiation studies in Geant4 2005/06: VD512 - New validation results on longitudinal shower shapes in Geant4 2005/06: SF515 - GDML schema extension to support divisions and reflections 2005/06: SF516 - Feasibility study of Pool/Root-based geometry persistency in Geant4 2005/06: SF517 - Python implementation of GDML writers for Geant4 and Root 2005/06: G4518 - Geant4 7.1 public release 2005/07: G4519 - Tutorial on Geant4 at CERN and move of Geant4 code repository to IT service 2005/09: VD522 - 3rd simple benchmark completed 2005/09: VD524 - Validation of Fluka against ATLAS TileCal test-beam 2005/09: GS527 - Procedure for light GENSER releases 2005/09: SF530 - Flugg application to ATLAS TileCal test-beam simulation 2005/10: G4531 - Improved Geant4 regression suite for release validation and testing infrastructure 2005/10: VD532 - First results of ATLAS combined and 2004 test-beams data comparisons 2005/12: GS535 - Generator level production framework: production quality release 2005/12: GS536 - Evaluation of possible migration of HepMC to LCG 2005/12: SF537 - Introduction of modularization of GDML files 2005/12: SF538 - Proposal for universal handling of Monte Carlo truth 2005/12: GF540 - Interface in Garfield with new version of Magboltz 2005/12: GF541 - Interface in Garfield with new version of Heed 2005/12: G4542 - Geant4 8.0 public release 2006/03: GS602 - Introduction of MCDB GRID certificates and management of large files 2006/05: G4606 - Developments for Geant4 8.1 public release 2006/06: SF608 - Refinements to GDML schema to support user extensions of elements 2006/06: VD617 - Investigation of corrections to test-beam data for validation of stand-alone simulation engines 2006/12: G4618 - Report on the main physics effects responsible for hadronic shower development in Geant4 2007/06: VD703 - Application of corrections to test-beam data to the LHC calorimeter test-beam simulations 2007/06: GS701 - Generator level validation framework production version 2007/09: GS702 - Pythia 8 production release

Page 11: Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT  Application Area Internal

AA Internal Review , Sep 2006 Slide 11

Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT

Current LCG simulation manpower

Simulation framework 1.80 (1.40)

Geant4 7.20 (7.70)

Infrastructure, performance, management (approx) 2.05

EM / Hadronic physics effort (approx) 3.90

Tracking, biasing, geometry (approx) 1.25

CERN staff (3.80), CERN fell./assoc. (3.40)

Physics validation 2.30 (1.90)

Validation specific to experiments 1.50

Generator services 3.30 (3.50)

management, documentation/release (LCG CERN, Florida U.) 1.20

GENSER dev., Validation, MCDB (LCG Russia, Italy) 1.85

Production Framework (LCG Spain) 0.25

Fluka 0.00

Garfield 1.00 (0.80)

Management 0.25

Total   15.85

As of Sep 15