singapore property weekly issue 142

Upload: propwisesg

Post on 04-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 142

    1/14

    Issue 142Copyright 2011-2013 www.Propwise.sg. All Rights Reserved.

    http://www.propwise.sg/http://www.propwise.sg/
  • 8/13/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 142

    2/14

    ContributeDo you have articles and insights and articles that youd like to share

    with thousands of readers interested in the Singapore property

    market? Send them to us at [email protected] , and if theyre good

    enough, well publish them here, on our blog and even on Yahoo!

    News.

    AdvertiseWant to get your brand, product, service or property listing out to

    thousands of Singapore property investors at a very reasonable

    cost? Head over to www.propwise.sg/advertise/ to find out more.

    CONTENTS

    p2 6 Reasons Why Property Curbs

    Should NOT Be Removed

    p9 Singapore Property News This Week

    p13 Resale Property Transactions

    (January 22January 28)

    Welcome to the 142thedition of the

    Singapore Property Weekly.

    Hope you like it!

    Mr. Propwise

    FROM THE

    EDITOR

    mailto:[email protected]://www.propwise.sg/advertise/http://www.propwise.sg/advertise/mailto:[email protected]
  • 8/13/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 142

    3/14

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

    Page | 2Back to Contents

    By Gerald Tay (guest contributor)

    There have been recent calls to the

    government asking to relax some of its

    property-cooling measures as demand for

    real estate wanes. MrGetty Goh, director at

    Ascendant Assets voiced his view on this,

    speaking at a Business Outlook Forumrecently.

    He said the government should consider

    repealing the Seller Stamp Duty (SSD) for

    residential properties introduced in January

    2011, because sellers who are keen to

    dispose their properties may find themselvestied down by it.

    Many people I have met who want you to

    invest in property dontcare two hoots if you

    6 Reasons Why Property Curbs Should NOT Be Removed

  • 8/13/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 142

    4/14

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

    Page | 3Back to Contents

    make money or not, as long as they profit

    from your investment. And the same group of

    people are now calling for property curbs to

    be removed because of a so-call lacklustre

    property market.

    Mr Getty Goh is one of the few respected

    voices I listen to among the many industry

    players, and therefore I believe he does not

    fall into the category of those Please invest

    in property so WE can get rich group. His

    view on relaxing some property rules may be

    a personal view of his own and not for profit

    interests.

    Here are six reasons why property curbs

    should NOT be removed today at least till a

    correction happens.

    1. Itstoo early

    Private home prices registered their first drop

    in seven quarters in the October-December

    period, falling 0.9 percent quarter-on-quarter.

    Meanwhile, public housing prices posted their

    second consecutive quarterly drop, down 1.5

    percent - the worst reading in eight years.

    Unwinding existing tightening policies for

    property simply because of a slight drop?

    This may be too premature as prices in both

    private homes and public housing are still

    very much elevated.

    For the government to roll back its policiesthat took four years to have an impact, a

    major correction has to happen. And I believe

    the government will continue its stand on

    existing measures till that happens.

    2. The market is not ready psychological ly

    Market psychology plays a huge part in rising

    asset prices and Singapores economy was

    resting more and more on asset based

    inflation supported by cheap liquidity in

  • 8/13/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 142

    5/14

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

    Page | 4Back to Contents

    recent years.

    Credit growth and bank financing drive up

    asset prices, causing lenders and borrowers

    to believe that even more credit growth isboth safe and desirable.

    The last four years of rapid property price

    escalation has been played out, not by real

    estate or economic fundamentals, but simply

    because everyone believes in the fallacy of

    an illusionary demand/supply dominated bythe market psychology of lemmings following

    the crowd.

    An even more vicious inflationary cycle will

    happen. If the government begins to unwind

    its policies, buyers want to buy, sellers want

    to sell, banks want to lend, developers see

    demand and want to buy more land and

    build more, the government sells and

    releases more landthe whole cycle will turn

    on itself.

    This will cause more supply in future and if

    theres a correction, the results will be

    distastrous to the economy.3. Still plenty of liquidity

    Even with the recent Fed tapering, the world

    is still awash with cash and developed-market

    interest rates are close to zero. Liquidity

    factors still have the ability to push real estate

    markets to new highs and to crazy

    overvaluation.

    The dire consequences and outcome of

    removing Sellers Stamp Duties (SSD) and

    other property measures in a bullish real

    estate market is unthinkable.

    4. Gamblers dontdeserve sympathy

    On the removal of the Sellers Stamp Duty

    (SSD), Mr Getty Goh explained this move

  • 8/13/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 142

    6/14

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

    Page | 5Back to Contents

    would help property owners offload their

    properties.

    He said, Theseowners in the event that they

    own two or three properties, giving risin

    interest rates and their inability to do a

    refinancing because of the Total Debt

    Servicing Ratio (TDSR), may be compelled to

    slash their prices to offload their property.

    This could snowball into a longer term

    problem when sellers flood the market aftethe Seller Stamp Duty expires in four years

    time, precipitating a crash in prices.

    Should we protect the interest of these

    property buyers whose finances are not built

    on solid foundations?

    The owners who buy and sell properties

    hoping to make a quick buck in a bullish

    market, either during a sub-sale or when the

    property T.O.Ps is gaming the property

    market like a casino. When the Sellers Stamp

    Duty and other property measures were

    implemented, they got stuck and hope for

    some form of salvation.

    Removal of SSD by the government will only

    send a negative message to more

    speculators that flipping in a bullish market is

    the right thing to do.

    An analogy to the above:

    Should we remove all casino regulations to

    help more gamblers gamble?

    Should we extend credit to gamblers to help

    them recover when they incur bad gambling

    debts?

    Will the casinos in Singapore go under

    because a bunch of gamblers lost money?

    Professional gamblers understand risk and

    protect the downsides to prevent losses

  • 8/13/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 142

    7/14

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

    Page | 6Back to Contents

    before they step into a casino. Shrewd

    property buyers are the same.

    The only downside protection ignorant

    gamblers have is buyand pray. So let them

    pray for now.

    5. Higher Cost of Living for Most

    Singaporeans

    Removal of property measures at current

    bullish levels will cause a further spike in land

    prices (See Reason 2), adding inflation to all

    asset prices. And this may result in a higher

    cost of living for most Singaporeans.

    6. Protect Genuine Home Buyers and

    Conservative Investors

    If Sellers Stamp Duty (SSD) and other

    property measures are removed at current

    point, property prices may continue to rise

    given the above reasons. This certainly does

    not bode well for many genuine home buyers

    in both private residential and HDB.

    Though most of the property measures are

    targeted to the private residential market,

    rising land prices have collateral effects on

    the HDB BTO market as well.

    Shouldnt the implementation of property

    measures to curb rising prices be meant for

    the majority of Singaporeans to afford and

    buy a decent home at decent prices?

    Or should the removal of the SSD and other

    property measures be meant to protect

    property speculators, and those with vested

    interests?

    Conservative investors can also help support

    the vibrancy of a stable property market wheninvesting with decent yields. Todays yields

    have been molested by current the indecent

    high prices.

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY I 142

  • 8/13/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 142

    8/14

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

    Page | 7Back to Contents

    Moving Forward

    On the contrary, more cooling measures are

    needed as prices have not come down to

    acceptable and reasonable levels.

    Removing property curbs is supposed to

    allow more sellers and buyers to come into

    the market, but in todays climate where

    prices are still adamantly high, will only add

    oil to the fire.

    Historically, property curbs are removed

    whenever there is a major price correction.

    This removal and correction will bode well for

    many genuine buyers and investors.

    Property prices climb up by the escalator and

    come down by the lift. A combination of risinginterest rates and increased supply in the

    market could trigger a correction in 2014 to

    2015, according to Barclays. The bank

    estimates home prices will fall 5 percent this

    year and between 5 and 15 percent next year

    and maybe more.

    For genuine buyers and investors, my advice

    to you is be patient and avoid buying with the

    lemmings, as the next eventual major

    correction may just be around the corner.

    Debt and leverage caused the 2008 crisis and

    now debt and leverage are greater than at

    any point in history. History always repeatsitself and this will end in tears.

    As for the speculators, their turn is soon over.

    By guest contributor Gerald Tay, CEO of

    CREI Academy Group, who exposes widely-

    held property investment myths that haveproven highly ineffective in creating wealth,

    and prevent a comfortable retirement for the

    ordinary investor.

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY I 142

    http://www.crei-academy.com/http://www.crei-academy.com/http://www.crei-academy.com/http://www.crei-academy.com/http://www.crei-academy.com/http://www.crei-academy.com/
  • 8/13/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 142

    9/14

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

    Page | 8Back to Contents

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

    https://www.coassets.com/https://www.coassets.com/
  • 8/13/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 142

    10/14

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

    Singapore Property This Week

    Page | 9Back to Contents

    Residential

    Opt imist ic out look for Riverbank @

    Fernvale

    Sale of units at UOL Group's 99-year

    leasehold 555-unit private condominium

    Riverbank @ Fernvale will begin next week.

    The average price indication is slightly over

    $1,000 psf. Prices of a 495 sq ft one-bedroom

    unit start from $476,000, or around $962 psf.

    A 947 sq ft three-bedroom unit starts from

    $878,000 or $927 psf. UOL Groupsproperty

    president Liam Wee Sin remains optimistic

    about buyer response, despite falling resale

    prices recently. Mr Liam says that their pricing

    is realistic because the tender bid last year

    was $489 psf ppr, and with the total debt

    servicing ratio (TDSR), underlying demand to

    upgrade is strong.

    (Source: Business Times)

    Savi l ls : pr ivate proper ty pr ices to r ise by

    2%

    The global real estate services providerSavills has forecast that overall prices of

    private property could increase by 2 percent

    in 2014, contrary to market expectations of

    decreasing prices which are not supported by

    the facts. In fact, Alan Cheong, the senior

    director at Savills Research, Singapore, saidthat many mass-market and mid-tier projects

    are in the hands of strong developers, who

    are unlikely to lower prices below comparable

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

  • 8/13/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 142

    11/14

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

    Page | 10Back to Contents

    benchmarks just to clear their stock.

    (Source: Business Times)

    Property sector hopes for the curb s to be

    tweaked or remo ved

    Property players are reported to hope that

    some of the cooling measures introduced -

    the total debt servicing ratio (TDSR) and

    additional buyers' stamp duty (ABSD) - might

    be tweaked or even rolled back. Donald Han,

    managing director at Chesterton Singaporesaid that such measures could be loosened

    up because they have had the desired

    results. In addition, sub-sales and foreigners'

    participation rates are now at a new low

    compared to two years ago thanks to the

    sellers' stamp duty (SSD) and ABSD, whilethe TDSR framework has significant influence

    on escalating property prices and transaction

    volumes.

    (Source: Business Times)

    Redas-NUS index s ends m ixed sign als

    The latest Real Estate Sentiment Index

    (RESI) survey, developed by the Real Estate

    Developers' Association of Singapore (Redas)

    and the National University of Singapore,

    shows that the Composite Sentiment Index

    capturing the overall market sentiment of

    property developers increased to 4.0 in Q4

    2013, from 3.9 in Q3 2013. Similarly, the

    Future Sentiment Index reached 4.0 from 3.9.

    However, 62 percent of the developerssurveyed anticipate a moderate decrease in

    residential property prices in the next six

    months, compared with 51.3 percent in Q3

    2013. Ku Swee Yong, chief executive of

    property consultancy Century21, said that

    such mixed signals in the survey reflectmarket uncertainties.

    (Source: Business Times)

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

  • 8/13/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 142

    12/14

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

    Page | 11Back to Contents

    Resale f lat COV hits 2009 cr isis low mark

    Median cash-over-valuation (COV) premiums

    for Housing and Development Board (HDB)

    resale units decreased from $5,000 in

    December 2013 to $3,000 January 2014

    similar to the previous low in the Global

    Financial Crisis in June 2009. Eight out of the

    28 HDB towns saw zero or negative median

    COV. Nicholas Mak, executive director at SLP

    International, said that HDB resale prices are

    stabilizing, and need to be read in light of the

    low transaction volumes in the same period

    which could translate to a wide range of COV

    figures. The flash report by the Singapore

    Real Estate Exchange (SRX) shows that

    Sengkang and Punggol had negative overall

    COVs in January; while Bishan, Geylang,

    Jurong West, Sembawang, Woodlands, and

    Yishun recorded zero overall median COV.

    Ong Kah Seng, director at R'ST Research,

    expects that prices may fall about 5 percent in

    the first half of this year, despite a small

    increase of 0.3 percent in January 2014.

    (Source: Business Times)

    Commercial

    Anso n House up for sale

    Anson Houses current owner, CBRE Global

    Investors, is reported to have put the 13-

    storey office block up for sale with an

    indicative pricing of $175-180 million, or$2,292-2,357 psf on net lettable area (NLA) of

    76,362 sq ft. 20 percent of the building, which

    is on a site with about 82 years of remaining

    lease, is currently vacant, which suits

    potential occupier who seeks to partly occupy

    the building as well as provision for signage

    and naming rights. The average passing rent

    is about $8 psf per month with recent rent

    standing at $8.50-$9.50 psf per month.

    (Source: Business Times)

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

  • 8/13/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 142

    13/14

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

    Page | 12Back to Contents

    Westgate Tower back on the leasing

    market

    Westgate Tower, the 20-storey office block

    next to Jurong East MRT Station, is back on

    the leasing market. A Sun Venture-Low Keng

    Huat (LKH) consortium has appointed Jones

    Lang LaSalle (JLL) and CBRE as joint sole

    leasing agents. Just last month, Sun Venture-

    LKH was granted options to buy the office

    tower at $579.4 million, or $1,900 psf, from

    the developers of the Westgate mixed-

    development project CapitaLand,

    CapitaMalls Asia and CapitaMall Trust. Sun

    Venture managing director Alvin Teo said that

    the new owners' asking rent is around $6.50

    psf, compared with the previous ownerssindicating office rents of $8 psf a month.

    (Source: Business Times)

    Tuas South lo ng- lease indus tr ial site for

    sale

    A long-lease 34,189 sq ft industrial site in 17

    Tuas South Street 5 has been launched for

    sale by Expression of Interest for $8.9 million.

    The site has a two-storey building with

    production and storage space, a mezzanine

    office with a GFA of approximately 39,795 sq

    ft. The lease tenure is about 45 years.

    Nicholas Ng, local director of investments at

    Jones Lang LaSalle the sites exclusive

    marketing agent, said factories with lease

    tenures of more than 40 years are rare, and

    that this site would be attractive to

    industrialists with huge upfront costs or

    leases expiring in the next few years.(Source: Business Times)

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

  • 8/13/2019 Singapore Property Weekly Issue 142

    14/14

    SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 142

    Page | 13Back to Contents

    Non-Landed Residential Resale Property Transactions for the Week of Jan 22 Jan 28

    NOTE: This data only covers non-landed residential resale propertytransactions with caveats lodged with the Singapore LandAuthority. Typically, caveats are lodged at least 2-3 weeks after apurchaser signs an OTP, hence the lagged nature of the data.

    Postal

    District

    Project NameArea

    (sqft)

    Transacted

    Price ($)

    Price

    ($ psf)

    Tenure

    4 CARIBBEAN AT KEPPEL BAY 2,583 2,715,000 1,051 99

    5 REGENT PARK 1,152 1,295,000 1,124 99

    8 KERRISDALE 1,485 1,700,000 1,144 99

    8 KENTISH GREEN 1,076 1,070,000 994 99

    10 8 NAPIER 2,777 8,608,700 3,100 FH

    10 8 NAPIER 2,777 8,391,300 3,022 FH

    10 GOODWOOD GARDENS 1,044 2,125,000 2,035 FH

    10 THE MONTANA 775 1,533,690 1,979 FH

    10 GALLOP GABLES 2,842 4,800,000 1,689 FH

    10 CASA JERVOIS 1,227 1,925,000 1,569 FH

    11 STRATA 1,066 1,750,000 1,642 FH

    14 STARVILLE 1,270 1,220,000 961 FH

    14 ASTOR 1,119 1,000,000 893 99

    15 PEBBLE BAY 1,894 2,620,000 1,383 99

    15 CELESTIA 646 855,000 1,324 FH

    15 RIVEREDGE 1,593 2,060,000 1,293 99

    16 COSTA DEL SOL 1,755 2,550,000 1,453 99

    16 CHANGI GREEN 904 988,000 1,093 FH

    16 EAST MEADOWS 1,216 1,200,000 987 99

    17 COASTAL BREEZE RESIDENCES 1,173 1,080,000 920 99

    20 SIN MING PLAZA 1,593 1,755,000 1,102 FH

    20 FAR HORIZON GARDENS 1,389 1,100,000 792 99

    Postal

    District

    Project NameArea

    (sqft)

    Transacted

    Price ($)

    Price

    ($ psf)

    Tenure

    21 1 KING ALBERT PARK 1,012 1,385,000 1,369 FH

    21 BEAUTY WORLD CENTRE 1,873 1,615,000 862 99

    23 THE MADEIRA 936 970,000 1,036 99

    23 PARKVIEW APARTMENTS 1,087 850,000 782 99

    23 PARKVIEW APARTMENTS 2,002 1,200,000 599 99

    25 CASABLANCA 936 900,000 961 99

    25 CASABLANCA 1,184 1,018,000 860 99

    25 THE WOODGROVE 893 755,000 845 99

    26 FOREST HILLS CONDOMINIUM 1,894 1,395,000 736 99