single-phase transformer design
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 Single-Phase Transformer Design
1/7
3/9/20
Single-phaseTransformer DesignEE 181 Maintainability Engineering
1
Outline
Common criteria for design
Heating issues
Current density and heat transfer
Electrical aspect of design: E-I transformer
example
2
Real transformer criteria
Core and winding losses
Economy
Performance
Reliability
Environmental impact
Location of use: (V/Hz ratio)
3
Examples of Insulations
Organic: up to 105o C
Cotton
Wax paper
Polyester film
Varnish
Inorganic
Mica
Asbestos
Fiberglass
Silicon Varnish (most used) 4
Insulation Classes
Class Maximum allowable
temperature (C)
Maximum allowable
temperature (F)
A 105 221
B 130 266
F 155 311
H 180 356
5
Source: Standard NEMA Classifications (retrieved from engineeringtoolbox.com)
Heating effect on windings
Increase in heat = reduction of flux (because of
thermal motion interfering with alignment ofmagnetic moments)
Reduction of flux = loss in magnetism
Loss of magnetism = loss of torque (rotation)
and of course, electrical production
6
-
8/2/2019 Single-Phase Transformer Design
2/7
3/9/20
Curie temperature
Also known as curie point
The temperature at which a ferromagnetic
material becomes paramagnetic; that is, loses
ALL magnetic ability (important for ferrite
core use)
7
Material Curie Temperature (C)
Iron 770
Cobalt 1130
Nickel 358
Oxidation
If metals insulation is insufficient, excessive
increase in temperature may cause oxidation
Oxidation = chemical reaction, breaking up of
molecular chains
End result: Rust
8
Managing heating effects
Electrically, most of the temperature drop is in
the form ofi2R losses in the iron core and
conductors
Dissipated heat must be transferred to the
cooling medium
Commonly used transformer cooling
mechanisms: air (natural cooling)
For larger units: Transformer oil (askarel)
H+ cooling (gaseous hydrogen), water9
Heat transfer coefficient
The amount of heat that can be removed from a
surface of areaA with a temperature difference T
Denoted by the symbol h , unit W/m2C
Typical range: 20 < h < 80 (air cooling)
For oil or water cooled (i.e. forced cooling), maximum
level ofh is around 250 W/m2C.
10
Current density (JC) and heat
transfer
Define currentdensity asampere/square meter
d
-
8/2/2019 Single-Phase Transformer Design
3/7
3/9/20
By definition of current density (A/m2)
Substituting conductor area considered:
Therefore, power loss equation becomes:
13
AJI C
SC KdyJI
S
SCKdy
lKdyJP
2
Cancelling common terms leaves us with:
Or, using conductor volume:
Design considerations:
we want low resistivity/high conductivity
wires
l,y,d dependent on wirings/number of turns
14
SC KdylJP 2
CC VJP 2
Current density and surface area
Surface area, in m2:
Taking the power dissipated per surface area:
Simplifying:
15
ylAS 2
ly
KdylJ
A
P SC
S
L
2
2
22watts/m,
2SC
S
L KdJ
A
P
Equate this to heat transfer coefficient by
Heat Balance Equation:
LHS: heat as dissipated from copper wiring
RHS: heat that the cooling medium cantransfer16
match)(units22
m
WxC
Cm
WTh
ThKdJ SC 2
2
Wire ampacity
Wire ampacity can be chosen by rearranging
the heat balance equation and isolatingJC:
17
S
CKd
ThJ
2
Example:
Consider the following section of transformer where
the ambient temperature is 40 degrees C and the coiltemperature is currently 135 degrees C. The coils are
insulated by a material which provides a 15 C drop.
The resistivity of the coil material is 2.5 x 10-8-m.
The heat transfer coefficient is 25 W/m2C. If the coil
parameters are given to be 10 mm with a spacing
factor of 0.5, solve for the required ampacity of the
wire.
18
-
8/2/2019 Single-Phase Transformer Design
4/7
3/9/20
Solution
Using the formula:
19
S
C Kd
Th
J
2
)5.0)(01.0)(105.2(
)80)(/25)(2(8
2
mmx
CCmWJC
80)1540(135 T
2A/m249.854,656,5CJ
2A/mm656.5CJ
Circular Mil and current
density 1 CM = area of a circular cross section with diameter =
1 mil.
1000 mil = 1inch
1 CM = (0.001)2/4 inches2
1 CM = (/4) x 10-6 in2
20
Converting Jc unit
Example: JC = 2.52 A/mm2
A higher value means greater area for the samecurrent, and thus less power loss.
21
AmmJC
/3952.01 2
2622
22
10)4/(
1*
)4.25(
in1*3952.0
inx
CM
mmA
mm
AmpCM/783
Design of 1 Transformer:
Electrical Aspect Faradays law:
Amperes law:
Also,
22
B
A
B
A
V
V
N
N
BBAA ININ
BA
By Faradays law of EM induction:
Assuming the flux density, B, to be sinusoidal
(since we assume the source is sinusoidal),
23
dt
dNV AA
dt
dBANV iAA
)sin()( max tBtB
Therefore,
The above expression for VA is in terms of peak
values, we take RMS equivalent as
We can now derive an expression for the core
area, Ai :
24
tBdt
tdBcos
)(max
tBANV iAA cosmax
2
maxBANV iAARMS
max
2
BN
VA
A
A
iRMS
-
8/2/2019 Single-Phase Transformer Design
5/7
3/9/20
Laminates
E-I transformer
utilizes laminations;
thin sheets of E-Isections are stacked,
with each sheet
insulated.
Introduce stacking
factor Ki(usually
0.9 or higher)
25
Estimate of core area, Ai
Taking into account the stacking factor,
Parameter observations
Ai estimated core area, for a certain voltage VArms,
Bmax how much flux can be produced at a certainfrequency ; also, hysteresis loss is dependent on
NA number of turns => resistance
For same core area, Bmax decreases as NA increases;hysteresis and core losses are minimized at the cost ofincreasing resistance
26
iA
A
i KBN
V
ARMS
max
2
Window Area
Total MMF:
Also,
27
Aw, JcAABBAA INININ 2
Ai
SwCenclosed KAJI
Combining the two equations yields the
estimate ofwindow area:
Current density JC is calculated depending on
coil thickness; resulting estimate may be
recalculated (i.e. iteration) depending on
result of design28
AASwC INKAJ 2
SC
AAw
KJ
INA
2
Area-window product
Product of Ai and Aw estimates:
Area-window product a function of magnetic
capability of material, stack and space factors,
frequency, and power (VI product)29
iA
A
SC
AAwi
KBN
V
KJ
INAA rms
max
22
siC
ArmsAwi
KKBJ
VIAA
max
22
Design Criteria
Energy conservation: requires high quality core for
peak flux density Thickness: chosen for lower core loss
Less conductor current density = less winding losses
If transformer is operated at rated load: max efficiency
equates winding (Cu) and core loss
30
PCu increases with turns
PCore core loss goes down with dB/dt
(where dB/dt decreases with NA)
NA
Plosses
-
8/2/2019 Single-Phase Transformer Design
6/7
3/9/20
Example: Transformer Design Design a single-phase transformer with the following given
requirements:
Voltage: 115 V pri / 24 V sec; Ks = 0.4, Ki = 0.9
60 Hz, 50 W; JC = 4 A/mm2 = 493 CM/Ampere
Total core loss (eddy + hysteresis) : 4.2 W/kg @ Bmax = 1.5 T
Core density = 7600 kg/m3, wire resistivity 2 x 10 -8-m
EI dimensions:
31
a3a
3a
3a
a/2
a/2
a/2
a/2
a/2
a/2
Solution
Calculate area-window product (core property):
32
siC
ArmsAwi
KKBJVIAAmax
22
)4.0(9.0)60(25.1104
5022
2
6 Tm
Ax
WAA wi
46m101736.0
xAAwi
From the E-I lamination figure:
Estimating using a square core area assumption,
Solving for the value ofa,
33
25.1)2/)(3( aaaAw
62 101736.05.1 xaAAA iwi
2
2
6
5.1
101736.0a
a
xAi
mmmmma 1944.18or01844.0
Window area is calculated as:
Core area estimate:
Stacking depth (adjusting for the rounded a)
34
222 5.541)19(5.15.1 mmmmaAw
2
2
6
5.3205.541
101736.0mm
mm
xAi
mmmm
mm
mm
a
Ai1786.16
19
5.320 2
Assuming a standard laminate (individual sheet)
thickness, Lt, of0.35 mm
35
thicknesslaminate
depthstackpiecesof#
piecesI-E497.480.35mm
17mmpiecesof#
Number of primary turns, NA (or NP)
Number of secondary turns:
36
ii
A
AKBA
VN RMS
max
2
)9.0()/377()5.1()10320(2)115(
26
sradTmx
V
997turns03.997 AN
24115
997xV
V
NN S
P
PS
turns209208.6 SN
-
8/2/2019 Single-Phase Transformer Design
7/7
3/9/20
Core loss: consider core material density and volume
We need to calculate volume using E-I dimensions and
calculated value ofa. First we take total area of each
laminate
37
CuVolumemasscore Cu
3a3a
3a
a/2
a/2
a
a/2
a/2
A1A2
A3
A4
A5
Area calculations:
A1 = (3a)(a/2)=1.5a2 A2 = (3a)(a/2)=1.5a2
A3 = (3a)(a/2)=1.5a2 A4 = (3a)(a) = 3a2
A5 = (3a)(a/2) = 1.5a2
ATOTAL = A1+A2+A3+A4+A5 = 9a2
Total Volume = ATx (stack depth) x (stacking factor)
Multiply this by volume density to obtain mass:
38
)9.0()017.0()019.0(9 2 mmVT
)9.0()017.0()019.0(97600 23
mmm
kgMass
kg0.377masstotal
Core loss computation:
For copper loss, consider the amount of winding
involved:
l = 4 quarter arcs (1 circle) + straight wire segments
= (2*19/4) + 2(19+17)l= 101.84 mm (mean length per turn) 39
WkgkgWPCore 586.1377.0/2.4
windings
r
19mm
17mm
ra/2
Define copper loss as a function of volume, current
density, and resistivity: (conductor volume is the
window area multiplied by the mean length)
lKaJVJPSCCCCu
22
)(
2
)( 5.1
mmmAxmxPCu 10184.04.0019.05.1/10410222268
WPCu
05.7
%25.8505.7586.150
50
WWW
W
Wire sizing
Different for primary and secondary windings
Calculated using the following formula:
In the example:
41
sec/
*1
(CM)sizewirepri
out
V
P
J
115V
W50*)
Amp
CM(493.38CMpri
CM/Amp38.4934
112
A
mm
J
24V
W50*)
Amp
CM(493.38CMsec
#27AWGCM5.214CMpri
#20AWGCM027.871CMsec
Adjustments/Approximations
Maximum efficiency happens when core = copper loss
(or at least as close as possible; i.e. around 5% diff) Current density was done on a coil dimension
estimate (may vary with the actual temperatures
involved)
Core loss factor (Watts/kg)
Note that core loss is composed of eddy+hysteresis;
hysteresis loss is frequency dependent
Copper loss is calculated on mean length per turn l,
may also vary depending on operating temperature
(i.e. resistance variation with T) 42