single subject research design (ssrd) · pdf filesingle subject research design (ssrd) bill...
TRANSCRIPT
SSRD Workshop 1
Single Subject Research Design(SSRD)
Bill Miller, PhD, OTUBC School of Rehab SciencesVCHA OT Research Scientist
SSRD Workshop 2
Objectives
• Define Single Subject Research Design (SSRD)• Rationale for using SSRD• Describe several forms of SSRD• Discuss the methods of analyses using SSRD• Discuss strengths & weaknesses of SSRD
SSRD Workshop 3
Continuum of Research
Quasi-Experimental(Groups -no random selection)
Case report Case Study (Individuals - SSRD)
Experimental(RCT)
Pre Scientific Scientific
SSRD Workshop 4
Other Names for SSRD
• Single case experimental design• Time series design• Small-N design• Single system designs• Within-subject comparison• Idiographic research• N of one trial
SSRD Workshop 5
SSRD Defined
SSRD involves studying a single individual or system by taking repeated measurements of 1 or more dependent variables and systematically applying & sometimes, withdrawing or varying the independent variable.
(Ottenbacher, 1986; Bloom & Fischer, 1982)
SSRD Workshop 6
Why Chose SSRD?
• Demonstrates individual differences• Difficulty obtaining adequate power (N)• Difficulty obtaining homogeneous group• SSRD is relatively easy to do• Helps validate practice • Demonstrate treatment (tx) effectiveness• Great pilot
SSRD Workshop 7
About SSRD
• Collection of methods (eg; AB, ABAC)• Answers research question or tests hypothesis• Involves at least one;
• Subject (individual or clinical unit/department)• Baseline or “A” Phase - series of repeated observations
or measurements with no intervention• Intervention or “B” Phase - introduction of experimental
variable with evaluation to see if change occurs • Dependent variable (quantifiable)• Independent variable (treatment / intervention)
SSRD Workshop 8
SSRD Phases
Baseline• Period of no tx - reflects natural state• Provide standard for evaluating tx effect• Measurements usually repeated until stability
demonstrated • 5 or more data points
SSRD Workshop 9
Sample Baseline Phases
89.5
90
90.5
91
91.5
92
92.5
93
93.5
1 2 3 4 5 6
Beh
avio
ur
88.5
89
89.5
90
90.5
91
91.5
92
92.5
93
1 2 3 4 5 6
Beh
avio
ur
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4 5 6
Se s s i o ns
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
1 2 3 4 5 6
Beh
avio
ur
A) B)
C) D)
SSRD Workshop 10
SSRD Phases
Intervention Phase• Introduce tx or intervention
• = independent variable
• Multiple treatments are alright • Repeated measurement of dependent variable• Phase length should be approximately same
as baseline
SSRD Workshop 11
Dependent Variable
• Variable of interest needs to be quantifiable• Does not require a standardized test
• Usually frequency, duration, magnitude• i.e. episodes of self-abuse / walk time / pain intensity
• Should assess reliability of variable» total % agreement» Point by point % agreement» kappa
SSRD Workshop 12
Simple Design
A-B– 1 baseline + 1 tx phase
Problems– Limited control over
threats to internal validity
Solution Replication– Add phases– Add other tx/interventions– Add subjects
4.5
5.5
6.5
7.5
8.5
9.5
10.5
11.5
12.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Time (session)
un
its
A B
SSRD Workshop 13
Withdrawal Designs
A-B-A– Shows intervention leads
to target behaviour (TB)– TB disappears when
intervention stopped
• Problems– Unethical to withdraw tx– Reversible target
behaviour 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Time (sesions)
Un
its
A B A
SSRD Workshop 14
Withdrawal Designs
A-B-A-B- adds an extra tx phase- ↑ confidence in tx effect
Problems- Reversible target
behaviour- Unethical to withdraw tx 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Days
# o
f h
its
A A BB
SSRD Workshop 15
Multiple Treatment Designs
Alternating– Rapid alternation of ≥ 2 txs (or tx &
placebo)– Txs alternated within same session,
session to session – Advantage = quick results, baseline
unnecessary– Sequence effect randomizing
counterbalance– Target must be clear & happen
rapidly90
91
92
93
94
95
96
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Daily sessions
Oxyg
en
sta
tura
tio
n
A B
SSRD Workshop 16
Multiple Treatment Designs
Interactive (A-B-BC-B-BC)– Assess separate & joint
effects of 2 or more txs– Best to replicate tx– Interactions can be tested
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Days
Weig
ht
(Kg
) an
d C
alo
ries
A B BC B BC
SSRD Workshop 17
Multiple Baseline Designs
Across Subjects/Conditions /Behaviors
• Useful when:– Behaviours non-replicable– Unethical to withdraw tx
• Uses basic A-B phase design– Measure baseline in all– Establish stability– Intro tx to 1st
subject/condition…– Intro next tx when previous tx
stabilizes
0
5
10
15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
0
5
10
15
20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Eye Fixation
Facial Posturing
0
5
10
15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Diaphragmatic Breathing
SSRD Workshop 18
SSRD Analysis
• Visual analysis most common• Assess trends & levels between adjacent phases
– Level – refers to change in value or magnitude of dependent variable after intervention
– Trend – refers to change in direction– Described as accelerating, decelerating, stable or variable
• Another technique Split middle Difference– Uses celeration line to which statistical significance can be
explored– Also 2 standard deviation method
SSRD Workshop 19
Visual Analysis
4.5
5.5
6.5
7.5
8.5
9.5
10.5
11.5
12.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Time (session)
un
its
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Time (sesion)
Un
its
Change in level Change in trendA) B)
SSRD Workshop 20
Sample Visual Analyses
4.5
5.5
6.5
7.5
8.5
9.5
10.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sessions
Beha
viou
rs
How would you describe the following changes?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Time (sesion)
Units
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Time (sesion)
Units
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Time (sesion)
Units
SSRD Workshop 21
Split-Middle Technique
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
A B
SSRD Workshop 22
SSRD Case Study Between Groups
Subject Own control No control Group control
Hypothesis Test Generate Test Extraneous variable Controls Describes May control
Design flexibility Permits change Permits change No changeDifferences Individual Individual Group
Generalizability Limited None Similar to groups
Measurement Repeated freq Through-out Few
Cost Low Low Can be high
Statistics Limited None Significance bt grps
SSRD, Case Study & Group Designs: Contrast and Comparison
SSRD Workshop 23
Useful References1. Backman CL, Harris SR. Case studies, single-subject research, and N of 1 randomized trials:
comparisons and contrasts. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1999;78:170-6.2. Backman CL, Harris SR, Chisholm JM, Monette AD. Single-subject research in rehabilitation: a review
of studies using AB, withdrawal, multiple baseline and alternating treatments designs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:1145-53.
3. Harris SR. Research techniques for the clinician. In B Connolly & P Montgomery (Eds). Therapeutic Exercise in Developmental Disabilities, Hixson, TX: Chattanooga Group.
4. Gonnella C. Single-subject experimental paradigm as a clinical decision tool. Phys Ther 1989;69:601-9.5. Guyatt G, Sackett D, Taylor W, Chong J, Roberts R, Pugsley S: Determining optimal therapy:
randomized trials in individual patients. N Engl J Med 1986;314:889-8926. Kazidin AE. Single-case research designs. New York: Oxford University, 1982.7. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Single-case experimental designs. Foundations of clinical research:
applications to practice (2nd ed). Appleton & Lange, 1993.8. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P: Deciding on the best therapy, in Clinical Epidemiology:
A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine, ed 2. Boston, Little, Brown & Co., 1991, pp 187-2489. Wolery M, Harris SR. Interpreting results of single-subject research designs. Phys Ther 1982;4:445.10. Zhan S, Ottenbacher KJ. Single subject research designs for disability research. Disabil Rehabil
2001;23:1-8.
SSRD Workshop 24