single top search

35
Single Top search - Significance study using S+J B- tagging K. Nakamura Univ. of Tsukuba

Upload: duard

Post on 14-Jan-2016

18 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Single Top search. - Significance study using S+J B-tagging. K. Nakamura Univ. of Tsukuba. Motivation. |V tb |. |V tb |. Produced electroweakly coupling Direct access to W-t-b vertex s singletop ~|V tb | 2 Top-polarization study and V-A structure of EW top interaction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Single Top search

Single Top search- Significance study using S+J B-tagging

K. NakamuraUniv. of Tsukuba

Page 2: Single Top search

2

Motivation

|Vtb|

|Vtb|

t-channel

s-channel

Produced electroweakly couplingDirect access to W-t-b vertex

singletop~|Vtb|2Top-polarization study and V-A structure of EW top interaction

Background study for SM Higgs searchExactly the same final state as WH->WbbBackground of all channels to use W+njet background

Probe b-quark PDF (t-channel)Non-SM phenomena

Heavy W’ bosonAnomalous W-t-b coupling ……

But…Cross section is small (~40% of tt)Larger background cause of W+2jets bin

Not established a significant evidence yet …

Page 3: Single Top search

3

Current Study and CDF NOTE

Signal Acceptance and Monte Carlo based backgrounds (CDF 7863)Validation of single-top signal samples (CDF 7701)

Event selection and MC validation

Anlysis with 0.7 fb-1 (CDF 8112)Non-W and W+njets (n=1,2,3) background estimationNeural network b-tagger (CDF 7816)Kinematics fitter for top quark reconstruction (CDF 749)Construct discriminates with Neural network with Likelihood ratio

Unit : pbLimit : 95%CL

theory Likelihood Ratio

Neural Network

t-channel 1.98±0.21 < 3.1

s-channel 0.88±0.07 < 3.2

t+s comb. 2.86±0.28 < 5.8 < 3.4

Result

Phys. Rev. D 71, 012005 (2005)

Projections for Single Top Sensitivity

(CDF 8286)NEW

Page 4: Single Top search

4

Backgrounds

MC based background

Data based backgroundNon-W MistagsWbb Wcc Wc

Page 5: Single Top search

5

Event Selection

Standard tight lepton selection of lepton+jet group.Detail is in appendix

Lepton ID

Et>20 GeVIsolated Conversion Veto

ElectronPt>20 GeV/cIsolated Cosmic Veto

Muon

Jet Energy CorrectionLevel4 Jet Energy Correction – not to apply abs correction

Et>15 GeV, Eta < 2.8

Et>20 GeVEt is corrected with lepton and Level4 jets

MET

Page 6: Single Top search

6

Signal/Background Expectation

@1fb-1

Page 7: Single Top search

7

The 2 jets bin networks have 14 input variables. The 14 input variables for 2 jet bin networks are shown in backup slide

NN discriminants

Page 8: Single Top search

8

NN b-tagger

This NN b-tagger is applied to jets that are already tagged by SecVtx tagger.

Page 9: Single Top search

9

Likelihood Function Analysis

t-channel

s-channel

Likelihood function uses 7 variables

Likelihood function uses 6 variables

Page 10: Single Top search

10

|Vtb|

s-channel

|Vtb|

t-channel

Motivation of our analysis

CDF NOTE 8112

Large amount of Background for this channel.About half of the background comes from Mistags and Wc(c).

Double tag is the powerful method to rejectthese background for s-channel !

But, statistics of the signal is limited by low efficiency of double tag.

We plan to apply “tight” + “loose” b-tagging S+JSecVtx JetProb

Page 11: Single Top search

11

Signal Sample

Generator : Mad EventEvent : single top s-channel LO Top Mass : Mt=175 GeV Name : ttop0oNew

Background Sample

Generator : Alpgen + pythiaEvent : W(->e)+nP W(->mu)+nP (n = 0,1,2,3,4)Name : ltop0n - ltop4n ltop0m – ltop4m

Page 12: Single Top search

12

SecVtx

Use Jprob<0.05

30% events in 2-jet bin can be tagged as s+s or s+j. >>> which corresponds to 46% of at least 1 secvtx tagged events in 2-jet bin.

Estimated b-tag performance of each method for s-channel

Page 13: Single Top search

13

W+nP Background with MC sampleMistag Matrix

12

3

4

12

3

4

12

3

4

12

3

4

Over estimate SS+SJ

2 S

Under estimate SS+SJ

i

Siε

ji

Sj

Si εε

At least 1 S

ji

Sj

Si

Sj

Ji

Jj

Si εεεεεε

ji

Sj

Ji

Jj

Si εεεε

Null-corr 100%-corr

Page 14: Single Top search

14

W(->e)+nP Background n=0,1,2,3,4over

under

Page 15: Single Top search

15

overunder

W+nP Normalized to 0.7 fb-1

~1/40

Page 16: Single Top search

16

0.022BS

0.59B

S

4.8 (2.5%)

s-channel significance

7.3 (46%) s-channel26.0 (46%)

0.74 (25%)

26.7

99.7 (46%)

2.2 (2.5%)

11.4 (14%)

113.3

0.56(2.5%)0.050B

S

0.61B

S

Page 17: Single Top search

17

Summary Double tag including s+j tagging has a potential to improve the s/n ratio and significance.

30% events in 2-jet bin can be tagged as s+s or s+j tag The fraction of s+s or s+j tagged events is 46% of at least 1 tag events According to very rough estimation,

Detail of signal selection will be confirmed. We will examine some kinematics variables for background rejection. We will estimate the sensitivity for single-top production as a function of integrated luminosity……

Plan

0.022BS

0.59B

S

0.050BS

0.61B

S improveCDFNOTE Double tag

Page 18: Single Top search

Backup

Page 19: Single Top search

19

CEM ele ID PHX ele ID

Page 20: Single Top search

20

Page 21: Single Top search

21

ID

Page 22: Single Top search

22

MC based background

Page 23: Single Top search

23

Non-W background

Page 24: Single Top search

24

Mistag background

Page 25: Single Top search

25

W+HF background

Page 26: Single Top search

26

NN input

Page 27: Single Top search

27

Page 28: Single Top search

28

t-channel Likelihood valuables

Page 29: Single Top search

29

Lepton IDStandard tight lepton selection of lepton+jet group.

Detail is in appendix

Et>20 GeVIsolated Conversion Veto

Electron

Pt>20 GeV/cIsolated Cosmic Veto

Muon

Page 30: Single Top search

30

Jet Energy CorrectionLevel4 Jet Energy Correction – not to apply abs correction

Et>15 GeV, Eta < 2.8

MET

Et>20 GeV

Et is corrected with lepton and Level4 jets

Et

Phi

Et/Pt()

L4 Jet … 0.8L5 Jet … ~1

Phi/Phi()

Page 31: Single Top search

31

Gen info after geometrical cuts

muonelectronlepton

L5 MET correction

Page 32: Single Top search

32

Event Selection

(96%)(90%)(25%)(24%)(24%)(24%)(23%)(21%)

Cross checkThis is t-channell result but…

Page 33: Single Top search

33

B-taggingPerformance of SecVtx and JetProb b-tagging

Number of events of under histogram include W+njet (n>0) final state

For the statistics of the signal double SecVtx tag is applied, about 70% statistics are increased to use S+J tagging.

Page 34: Single Top search

34

Jet multiplicity distribution of b-tag performanceSecVtx JetProb

Cross checkJet multiplicity distribution after b tag (CDF 7863)

19.2% 64.7% 13.6% 2.1% 0.3%

Good agreement !?

Use Jprob<0.05 cuts for Jet Prob.

Page 35: Single Top search

35

overunder

W(->)+nP Background n=0,1,2,3,4