sipm for meg2
DESCRIPTION
SiPM for MEG2. On behalf of the italianTC group Fukuoka 23 Oct 2013. Current TC time resolution Intrinsic TC resolution at BTF is ~40 ps In MEG degradation due to B and to large dynamic range 40 ps → 50 ps expected Additional degradation due - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
SiPM for MEG2
On behalf of the italianTC group Fukuoka 23 Oct 2013
Current TC time resolution
Intrinsic TC resolution at BTF is ~40 psIn MEG degradation due to B and to large dynamic range 40 ps → 50 ps expectedAdditional degradation due to DRS (DrS(t) ~30-50ps) → 60 ps (measured with triple, 65 ps is anoverestimation)
Current te resolution
Dominant contribution from t
(TC+DRS) = (BTF)(1+ (MEG))+ (DRS) =
40x(1 + 0.25) + 40 = 60 ps
(BTF) intrinsec (from BTF)
(MEG) relative degradation due to B (low G), large signal dynamic range(DRS) due to DRS
Upgrade TC time resolutionResolution s(t
TC) = 30 (33) ps measured
MEG Additional error (B, extra dynamic range): 1.1
Reduced DRS error: 25 ps
Calibration: 30 ps(???)
Upgrade te resolution
MEG MEG2(my) MEG2(proposal) Intrinsec 40 ps → 30 ps 35 ps MEG factor 0.25 0.1 DRS 40 ps 25 ps TC calib 40 ps 30 ps Le/c 75 ps 35 ps 11 ps--------------------------------------------------- t
e 107 ps 63 ps 37
ps t 67 ps → 64 ps
76 ps ---------------------------------------------------- t
e 122 ps 90 ps 84 ps
te in alternative scenarios
• tTC
intrinsic = 20 ps -> te = 87 ps
• tTC
intrinsic = 30 ps -> te = 90 ps (Hamamatsu)
• tTC
intrinsic = 33 ps -> te = 91 ps (AdvanSId)
• tTC
intrinsic = 40 ps -> te = 93 ps
• s(calibration) = 30ps • The change are tiny.• Limit on->e scales linearly with resolution• But 1 more week/y per extra calibration or commissioning would waste a 3% gain
Calibration and (te
Relative calibration between TC counter(and with XEC) can strongly influence (t
e) Stability of the SiPM is of importantIn particular the thermal coefficients dV/dT should be as small as possible
That is a relevant parameter for deviceswith comparable s(t
TC)
dV/dT = 50 mV/oC for (Hamamatsu) dV/dT = 25 mV/oC for (AdvanSid)
Conclusion
Hamamatsu and AdvanSid are equivalent from the point of view of the effect on t
e time resolution
AdvanSid offers better performance from the point of view of stability that may allow precise calibration
AdvanSid is our preferred choice for MEG2