sirpa karjalainen

31
Sirpa Karjalainen Ministerial Advisor, MAF Co operation and innovation in RDP Mainland Finland

Upload: eriaff2014

Post on 22-Aug-2014

112 views

Category:

Food


4 download

DESCRIPTION

ERIAFF2014 Conference Seinäjoki, Finland Sirpa Karjalainen, Ministerial Advisor Ministry of Forest and Agriculture of Finland "Co-operation and innovation in RDP Mainland Finland"

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sirpa Karjalainen

Ministerial Advisor, MAF

Co operation and innovation

in RDP Mainland Finland

Page 2: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 2 18.6.2014

Some background information

How we do it now

How we would like to do it in the

future

Page 3: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 3 18.6.2014

3

Finland • Surface area 338 145 km2

- forestry land 262 700 km2 (78%)

- agricultural land 22 500 km2 (6.7%)

• Population 5 228 000 - share of rural population about 30%

• Population density 15 persons/km2

- (EU-15 120 persons/km2)

• GDP: - 149.7 billion euros (€)

- 28 600 €/person - share of agriculture and forestry 3.2%

Page 4: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 4 18.6.2014

Page 5: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 5 18.6.2014

Page 6: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 6 18.6.2014

6

Maito, osuus

Yli 0,5 % (57)

0,2 - 0,5 % (111)

0,1 - 0,2 % (107)

Alle 0,1 % (157)

Maito, muutos

Kasvanut yli 10 % (108)

Kasvanut 0 - 10 % (72)

Pienentynyt 0 - 15 % (118)

Pienentynyt yli 15 % (134)

Milk production, concentrating in some areas

Page 7: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 7 18.6.2014

Page 8: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 8 18.6.2014

rivers

lakes

sea main emphasis of the agri

environmental measure is to

reduce nutrient load from

agriculture in the watercourse

and enhance the biodiversity

Page 9: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 9 18.6.2014

9

National Quality Strategy for the Food Sector

• Joint programme of all operators in the food sector launched in 1997

→ aimed to construct a quality chain for foodstuffs from farm to

table

• Purpose of the quality chain is to guarantee safe, high-quality

foodstuffs (traceability) and efficient action all through the chain.

Input

industry

Primary

productions

Food

industry

Transportation Trade Consumer

Food services

Page 10: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 10 18.6.2014

Biotalousstrategian tavoitteena on nostaa biotaloutemme tuotos 100 miljardiin euroon

vuoteen

2025 mennessä ja luoda 100 000 uutta työpaikkaa.

1.KILPAILUKYKYINEN BIOTALOUDEN

TOIMINTAYMPÄRISTÖ Biotalouden kasvulle luodaan kilpailukykyinen

toimintaympäristö 2. UUTTA LIIKETOIMINTAA BIOTALOUDESTA Biotalouteen luodaan uutta liiketoimintaa

riskirahoituksen, rohkeiden kokeilujen ja toimialarajojen

ylittämisen avulla

3. VAHVA OSAAMISPERUSTA BIOTALOUDELLE Biotalouden osaamisperustaa kehitetään koulutusta ja

tutkimustoimintaa uudistamalla

4. BIOMASSOJEN KÄYTETTÄVYYS JA KESTÄVYYS Biomassojen saatavuus, raaka-ainemarkkinoiden

toimivuus ja käytön kestävyys turvataan

To

imeen

pan

o ja

seu

ran

ta

Str

ate

gis

et

äm

äärä

t

SUOMEN BIOTALOUSSTRATEGIA

Biotalouden

kestävät

ratkaisut ovat

Suomen

hyvinvoinnin ja

kilpailukyvyn

perusta

National Strategy for Bio-economy

Bio-economy strategy aims to increase the output of the

bio-economy € 100 billion by 2025 and to create 100 000 new jobs.

Page 11: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 11 18.6.2014

Growth in Häme –Programmatic development of the food chain 2007–2014

Growth in Häme

Information network 2

The food and drink

of Häme tomorrow

The food of

tomorrow

The food and drink

tomorrow

FIVE INTERLINKED PROJECTS

• From an actor-oriented approach to customer-oriented

- Enabling activity

- Active participation

- Successful forms of activity

- Development of production and interest in making investments

• A new way of thinking about development

- from a food chain into developing a food system

Page 12: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 12 18.6.2014

1. Implementation model: an extended development network, which has generated ideas for, implemented and managed centrally and through effective delegation over 40 thematic projects related to the dairy sector during 1997–2013. Activities began under the brand Maito-Savo (Dairy Savo), now each member of the network has its own brand

2. Innovations include extensive delegation, a cost-effective, unidirectional method of implementation that produces results, the one stop shop principle and minimising overlap in development and project work

Developing the dairy sector in North Savo

Page 13: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 13 18.6.2014

METKA: Profitable Energy from the Forest

Core of the project • Research and development project

– the goal is increased profitability and better quality in the supply chain for forest energy

– the development of the forest energy supply chain will benefit directly from the research, through e.g. correct equipment choices and logistics control

• It is necessary to get wood chip fuel to user locations at a competitive price. The forest energy supply chain must also be profitable for all parties.

• The large forest management associations Kanta-Häme and Päijät-Häme, TTS (Työtehoseura), and the Finnish Forest Research Institute (Metla) are all involved in the cooperation project as research institutes

• The results will be immediately put into use in the forest energy supply chain

The project created an operational model for forest energy based on the research results

Page 14: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 14 18.6.2014

3

23

0

Events and tests

Size of the farmer

network

IMPLEMENTED BY:

FRAMI OY

Seinäjoki University of Applied

Sciences, Ilmajoki

University of Helsinki, Ruralia

Institute

FUNDED BY:

ELY CENTRE FOR SOUTH OSTROBOTHNIA

(EUROPEAN AGRICULTURAL FUND FOR

RURAL DEVELOPMENT (EAFRD))

Agricultural technology companies

www.agrolivinglab.fi

43 Implementers

Agro Living Lab – developing cooperation in product development

between farmers and companies producing agricultural

machinery.

Size of the farmer

network

Events and tests

230

3

Page 15: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 15 18.6.2014

120 27

100

EVENTS

LESSONS

PARTICIPANTS

IMPLEMENTED BY:

FRAMI OY

VOCATIONAL ADULT

EDUCATION SEDU

FUNDED BY:

ELY CENTRE FOR SOUTH OSTROBOTHNIA

(EUROPEAN AGRICULTURAL FUND FOR RURAL

DEVELOPMENT (EAFRD))

LÄHITAPIOLA

NICEKONE – training in agricultural technology for women

farmers.

Contact education, theme nights and study trips.

Page 16: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 16 18.6.2014

The development project of the food chain

of Southwest Finland (VARRU) • The project is implemented by the Functional Foods Forum, the Finland Futures Research

Centre, and the Brahea Centre for Training and Development, which are units of the University of Turku.

• Project period 2011–2014 (extension granted)

• Funding by the ELY Centre for Southwest Finland, Rural Development Programme for Mainland Finland 2007–2013

• Target group: food chain actors from the field to the table and back

• Goals and innovations: - Developing a cooperation network

responding to the challenges of today by strengthening networks

- Developing the food chain in Southwest Finland and new opportunities

Implementing the future process

Including the forecasting of future as a part of business activities

- Increasing the strategic role of the food sector

Effectiveness of the food chain in the language of the decision-makers

(€/GDP/employment)

Making the food chain seen and heard by the consumers

Page 17: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 17 18.6.2014

1. Poor quality of surface water in agricultural areas was a

challenge; a pilot area was selected in the municipality of

Urjala.

2. Drainage basin -specific, farm-oriented design: a complete

information package on cultivation and the environment

shown on maps is tailored to the farmer by taking advantage

of e.g. GIS data. Financial and environmentally sustainable

solutions for developing cultivation and managing the

agricultural environment are found through farm-specific

guidance. The goal is to find practical solutions and actions

through cooperation between experts from different fields.

Public events are also organised in participatory planning.

Environmental management and water protection in

agriculture in Pirkanmaa “Environment compass”

YMPÄRISTÖKOMPASSI PROJECT 2012–2014

Riikka Söyrinki

ProAgria Etelä-Suomi,

Finnish Rural Women’s

Advisory Organisation

Page 18: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 18 18.6.2014

The Responsible Pork Production project

is a development project implemented in

Varsinais-Suomi and Satakunta.

The areas' pork producers form the target

group for this project.

The project is divided into entities, the goals

of which are to improve feeding, spend fixed

costs more efficiently and improve

documentation as well as the sections of

production responsibility.

The project has utilized its own experts, HK

Agri's experts, MTT's researchers as well as

other expert services.

The website was created in order for the

-producer to achieve an competitive cost level

-pig to receive good care

-consumer to receive high-quality products

It will bring the highest level of success if all

stakeholders in the pork industry have a common

vision on the best practices of production.

The target groups and ideas of the project

We hope that the manual is read and used by:

pork producers

workforce employed by piggeries

veterinarians

the meat production industry

the feed industry and other input producers

and input marketers

agricultural experts

banks and financiers

educational institutes

agricultural lobbyists

other people interested in production

http://www.vastuullinensikatalous.fi/en/project

On the website, you will find a handbook that

describes the best practices of pork production

in terms of feeding, care, construction and

ventilation. Russian and English translations

have been created for feeding and care. Their

aim is to describe the best Finnish practices also

to foreign piggery employees.

Page 19: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 19 18.6.2014

Page 20: Sirpa Karjalainen

Rural Innovation Camps

Summary

Main Activities

Innovation Camps are a tool to encourage the development of new ideas,

products and services and also different ways of working in rural areas. Finnish

NSU has arranged both national and regional camps. They have brought

together specialists and entrepreneurs to develop innovative solutions to the

threats and opportunities apparent in Finnish rural areas. Over three days and

two nights the ideas are developed in to new products, services and methods.

Finnish NSU organized with its partners a

national Innovation Camp in 2012. An open

call for rural innovation ideas was

launched. 47 different ideas were identified

and 8 of these were developed further in

the Camp. In 2013 the Innovation Cams

were taken to regional level. Through open

call 5 areas were selected where regional

camps are organized.

Key Success

A new model for developing innovation was

launched and it has been disseminated at a

regional level. New actors took part in the process -

even urban actors were interested in participating.

We have built new innovations and ways of doing

things and promoted the potential of rural areas for

new growth.

Innovation camps

Page 21: Sirpa Karjalainen

Innovation camps

Conclusion

Innovation Camps are an excellent tool to develop the rural ‘innovation environment’ in

order to increase and improve co-operation between experts and develop and share a

new method of working. It works both on national and regional level. Innovation

Camps showcase the strengths of the countryside, develop new rural innovations in

product development and service provision and raise awareness of the opportunities

provided by the RDP's.

Innovation Camps can also be used as tool to build and develop EIPs, European

Innovation Parnerships.

Innovation Camps:

very practical but intensive way to develop new ideas in to innovations

build the local "innovation environment": can change the processes

good tool to attract new actors in rural development

the initial idea was received from Sweden - benchmarking works in ENRD

good way to receive publicity for the strengths of rural areas and the RDP

can be used as a tool in the EIP-processes

Page 22: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 22 18.6.2014

We would like to see co

operation projects in:

Page 23: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 23 18.6.2014

LOCAL

(by over 50 Leader –groups

covering all rural areas in FI)

Page 24: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 24 18.6.2014

REGIONAL

(big differences between the reality

and strategies)

Page 25: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 25 18.6.2014

INTER REGIONAL

(e.g. covering Eastern Finland)

Page 26: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 26 18.6.2014

NATIONAL

(common interest or special

innovation)

Page 27: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 27 18.6.2014

EUROPEAN

Context

-as with connection to

H2020 research –projects

but also between individual

partners

Page 28: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 28 18.6.2014

Rural innovation group (EIP/OG) -working for a certain innovation

- selected nationally (business potential etc.)

• Co operation group for rural livelihood e.g.:

- tourism (micro only)

- energy

- metal and machinery

EIP/OG -if fulfilling the requirements

• Co operation group for agriculture, forestry,

• bio economy

• EIP/OG -if fulfilling the requirements

Need-based, goal-oriented projects: not planning for planning or coffee trinking:

Innovation clusters, horizontal and vertical groups, pilot projects,

demonstration projects combined with training measure and other EU –funds

also.

Page 29: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 29 18.6.2014

All are following same rules

according the type of project: (PRELIMINARY) • GBER:

- ”fundamental research” (up to 90 %)

- ”industrial research” (up to 80%)

• De minimis (max 200 000 / 3 year):

- innovation cluster

- pilot project

• Investments for demonstration project (Art 14 ?)

• Investments connected to innovation groups: - art 18 or 19 +20 %

• Leader groups: max 180 000 € / project.

• International projects follow the procedure of Leader

• Flat rate max 25 % for the overhead cost. Lump sum if suitable.

Page 30: Sirpa Karjalainen

Sivu 30 18.6.2014

160 B to use >>>>> 10

300

All potential in use, diversification, competitiveness and

employment in sustainable way. Local food, food chain,

organic production, tourism, metal and machinery, services.

New clusters (bio-economy), pilot projects, demonstrations,

new co operation between producers

Page 31: Sirpa Karjalainen

Thank you!

For more information please visit

www.rural.fi