site assessment proforma - harvingtonplan.uk · site assessment proforma . general information ....
TRANSCRIPT
1
Site Assessment Proforma General information
Site Reference / name A
Site Address (or brief description of broad location)
Land to the South of Village Street, Harvington. (Opposite Golden Cross PH)
Current use Western half of site is agricultural farmland; Eastern half of site is overgrown /vacant / horse paddock / water storage tanks (agricultural irrigation)
Proposed use Housing
Gross area (Ha) Total area of the site in hectares
1.76 hectares
SHLAA site reference (if applicable)
46-09
Method of site identification (e.g. proposed by landowner etc.)
2016 call for sites
Context
Is the site: Greenfield: land (farmland, or open space, that has not previously been developed) Brownfield: Previously developed land which is or was occupied by a permanent structure,
Greenfield
Brownfield
Mixture
Unknown
2
including the curtilage of the developed land and any associated infrastructure.
Site planning history Have there been any previous applications for development on this land? What was the outcome?
Application No: W/16/01485/OU (Land to the East of Evesham Road, Harvington) – Outline planning application for 155 dwellings (demolition of existing outbuildings). Application refused. Registered 10/06/2017. Application No: W/14/02434/OU (Land to East of Evesham Road, Harvington) – Outline application for 190 dwellings and demolition of existing outbuildings. Application refused. Registered. Appeal withdrawn. 05/11/2014. Application No: W/16/00322/OU (Land to East of Evesham Road, Harvington) – Outline application for 155 dwellings (demolition of existing outbuildings). Application refused. Appeal withdrawn. Registered 05/02/2016.
Suitability
Site Characteristics
Is the current access adequate for the proposed development? If not, is there potential for access to be provided?
There is an existing narrow road/walkway running through the site. There is a potential for upgrade of site entrance onto Village St.
Is the site accessible? Provide details of site’s connectivity
The site is currently accessible from Village Street and in close proximity to the B4088. The site is approximately 4km from the A44. The site is in close proximity to public transport bus route providing half hourly service to Stratford Upon Avon. The nearest train station is in Evasham.
Environmental Considerations
Questions Assessment guidelines
Observations and comments
Is the site within or adjacent to the following policy or environmental designations:
• Green Belt • Ancient Woodland • Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
(AONB) • National Park • European nature site (Special Area of
Conservation or Special Protection Area) • SSSI Impact Risk Zone • Site of Importance for Nature
Conservation • Site of Geological Importance • Flood Zones 2 or 3
Site lies within Impact Risk Zone of one/two
SSSIs
The site lies within the far outer impact risk zone of Windmill Hill SSSI, which is considered distant enough for this to be only a minor constraint; Natural England should nevertheless be consulted with respect to any planning applications.
Ecological value? Could the site be home to protected species such as bats, great crested newts, badgers etc.?
Unknown
There could be potential for protected species; ecological survey would be required ahead of any planning
3
application.
Landscape and Visual Impact Is the site low, medium or high sensitivity in terms of landscape and visual impact? Low sensitivity: site not visible or less visible from surrounding locations, existing landscape or townscape character is poor quality, existing features could be retained Medium sensitivity: development of the site would lead to a moderate impact on landscape or townscape character due to visibility from surrounding locations and/or impacts on the character of the location. (e.g. in built up area); High sensitivity: Development would be within an area of high quality landscape or townscape character, and/or would significantly detract from local character. Development would lead to the loss of important features of local distinctiveness- without the possibility of mitigation. Low landscape
sensitivity
Low visual impact
The Worcestershire County Council Landscape Character Assessment classifies the site as ‘village farmlands with orchards’.
While there are views out of the site, these views are not as prominent due to screening of hedgerows and trees.
Proposed development of the site will integrate into the natural urban envelope of the village, with the site entrance and northern edge of the site being within the settlement boundary and village confines.
Views into the site are from adjacent residential dwellings, views into the site are otherwise negligible due to hedgerow screening.
Site is in the Environmental Character Area (ECA) of Lenches Ridge. The strategic Green Infrastructure approach for the Lenches Ridge ECA is to protect and enhance the hedgerow field boundaries and tree cover pattern, while respecting the characteristic local enclosure pattern. Development of the site would have to accord with Local Plan Policy SWDP 5: Green Infrastructure, where Housing development proposals (including mixed-use schemes) are required to contribute towards the provision, maintenance, improvement and connectivity of Green Infrastructure.
Agricultural Land Land classified as the best and most versatile agricultural land (Grades 1,2 or 3a) None
Development of the site will lead to loss of agricultural land. However, the land is not designated within the agricultural land classification.
Heritage considerations
Question Assessment Comments
4
guidelines
Is the site within or adjacent to one or more of the following heritage designations or assets?
• Conservation area • Scheduled monument • Registered Park and Garden • Registered Battlefield • Listed building • Known archaeology • Locally listed building
Limited or no impact or no requirement for
mitigation
The site is located near the Harvington conservation area. The development will have limited to no impact upon the character of the conservation area as the site is located a sufficient distance away.
Community facilities and services
Is the site, in general terms, close/accessible to local amenities such as (but not limited to):
• Town centre/local centre/shop • Employment location • Public transport • School(s) • Open space/recreation/ leisure
facilities • Health facilities • Cycle route(s)
Where a site is poorly located if > 800m, moderately located if 400m to 800m, and favourably located if < 400m from services.
Favourably Located
Observations and comments
The site is located in an accessible location to local village amenities and services.
The area provides bus services to Stratford Upon Avon from the nearest bus stop on village road, 100m away from the site.
There is a primary school in the village, recreational and open space, and health facilities nearby.
Harvington also provides bus services into the town of Evesham, providing locals with town centre shopping and services within a 30 minute journey. The nearest health centre is located in Evesham. From Evesham, Worcester is accessible by rail, providing city centre services and attractions.
Other key considerations
Are there any Tree Preservation Orders on the site?
None
Would development lead to the loss of habitats with the potential to support protected species, for example mature trees, woodland, hedgerows and waterbodies?
Low/ Unknown
There are no designated nature assets, wildlife sites, dedicated woodlands, or tree protection orders that would constrain development on the site. A detailed ecological assessment however should be carried out before the submission of any planning application.
Public Right of Way Yes There is a public access route through the site.
Existing social or community value (provide details) No The site has a public right of way that could be used as a
recreational amenity by villagers.
Is the site likely to be affected by any of the following?
Yes No Comments
5
Ground Contamination
Unknown. An assessment would need to be
undertaken; however it is unlikely that there is significant ground contamination given that the land is greenfield.
Significant infrastructure crossing the site i.e. power lines/ pipe lines, or in close proximity to hazardous installations
Telegraph poles cross the site.
Characteristics
Characteristics which may affect development on the site:
Comments
Topography: Flat/ gentle slope/ steep gradient
Flat, with the western half of the site sloping gently from east to west
Coalescence Development would result in neighbouring settlements merging into one another.
No
Scale and nature of development would be large enough to significantly change size and character of settlement
No. Development of site will integrate into centre of village and has potential to infill the natural settlement
boundary.
Any other comments? While access to Site A is within the Harvington Settlement Boundary, the remainder of the site is outside the settlement boundary and so proposed development would conflict with Policy SWDP 2 with regard to permitting residential development in open countryside.
3.0. Availability Assessing the suitability of the site will give an indication of whether the site has any constraints to development. It should consider aspects such as infrastructure, planning policy, local services, heritage and other considerations.
Availability
Yes No Comments
Is the site available for sale or development (if known)? Please provide supporting evidence.
Are there any known legal or ownership problems such as unresolved multiple ownerships, ransom strips, covenants, tenancies, or operational requirements of landowners?
Unknown.
Is there a known time frame for availability? 0-5 /6-10 / 11-15 years.
Unknown.
4.0. Summary Assessing the suitability of the site will give an indication of whether the site has any constraints to development. It should consider aspects such as infrastructure, planning policy, local services, heritage and other considerations.
6
Conclusions
Please tick a box
The site is appropriate for allocation
This site has minor constraints
The site has significant constraints
The site is not appropriate for allocation
Potential housing development capacity at 30 dph in accordance with Policy SWDP 13: 53
Key evidence (3-4 bullet points) for decision to accept or discount site.
• Site is located in favourable and central location to village amenities and bus stop;
• Site is outside the settlement boundary, whereby the principal of development is not permitted in accordance with Policy SWDP 2. A settlement boundary review would have to be undertaken to allocate Site A within the Neighbourhood Plan.
1
Site Assessment Proforma General information
Site Reference / name B
Site Address (or brief description of broad location)
Land South of Crest Hill
Current use Agricultural
Proposed use Housing
Gross area (Ha) Total area of the site in hectares
2.13
SHLAA site reference (if applicable)
46-23, and Refs. 46-02 + 46-11 make up Site B
Method of site identification (e.g. proposed by landowner etc.)
2016 call for sites
Context
Is the site: Greenfield: land (farmland, or open space, that has not previously been developed) Brownfield: Previously developed land which is or was occupied by a permanent structure, including the curtilage of the developed land and any associated infrastructure.
Greenfield
Brownfield
Mixture
Unknown
Site planning history Have there been any previous applications for development on this land? What was the outcome?
Application No: W/15/02114/OU (Land to the South of Crest Hill) Outline planning application for 67 dwellings. Application refused. Registered 17/08/2015
Application No: W/14/01788/OU (Land to South of Crest Hill) – Outline application for 85 dwellings. Application withdrawn. Registered 24/09/2014
Suitability
Site Characteristics
Is the current access adequate for the proposed development? If not, is there potential for access to be provided?
Current access from site to Crest Hill is not adequate for proposed development, as access has potential to cause issues with road safety, the access being on the crest of a hill and on bus route. Potential site access would have to be through the site allocated for development to the east of Site B.
Is the site accessible? Provide details of site’s connectivity
Site is directly accessible from Crest Hill. Site is approximately 4km from the A46. Site is 200m from nearest bus stop, and half hourly bus route to Four Pools and Stratford-upon-Avon.
2
Environmental Considerations
Questions Assessment guidelines
Observations and comments
Is the site within or adjacent to the following policy or environmental designations:
• Green Belt • Ancient Woodland • Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
(AONB) • National Park • European nature site (Special Area of
Conservation or Special Protection Area) • SSSI Impact Risk Zone • Site of Importance for Nature
Conservation • Site of Geological Importance • Flood Zones 2 or 3
Site lies within Impact Risk Zone of one/two
SSSIs
The site lies within the far outer impact risk zone of Windmill Hill SSSI, which is considered distant enough for this to be only a minor constraint; Natural England should nevertheless be consulted with respect to any planning applications.
Eastern edge of site is within Flood Zone 3.
Ecological value? Could the site be home to protected species such as bats, great crested newts, badgers etc.? Unknown
There could be potential for protected species; ecological survey would be required ahead of any planning application.
Landscape and Visual Impact Is the site low, medium or high sensitivity in terms of landscape and visual impact? Low sensitivity: site not visible or less visible from surrounding locations, existing landscape or townscape character is poor quality, existing features could be retained Medium sensitivity: development of the site would lead to a moderate impact on landscape or townscape character due to visibility from surrounding locations and/or impacts on the character of the location. (e.g. in built up area); High sensitivity: Development would be within an area of high quality landscape or townscape character, and/or would significantly detract from local character. Development would lead to the loss of important features of local distinctiveness- without the possibility of mitigation.
High landscape sensitivity
High visual impact
The Worcestershire County Council Landscape Character Assessment classifies the site as ‘village farmlands with orchards’.
Development on the site may affect the area’s existing village and rural character. Views of the rural character and conservation area landmarks from the Evesham Road and approach to the village gateway at Crest Hill, and from the southern banks of River Avon and Hill to Cleeve Prior have potential to be impacted by proposed development. Site is at prominent gateway to village with views of the conservation area and church. An appeal for development proposals for Site B and field to north was rejected by inspector due to impact of housing on views towards the church (local landmark in the CA) from the Evesham Road eastwards. It was found that development would change the character of setting of the village, especially as this is one of three gateways into Harvington.
3
Likewise there are views out of the village through Site B of the River Avon corridor and Cotswolds escarpment.
Site is in the Environmental Character Area (ECA) of Lenches Ridge. The strategic Green Infrastructure approach for the Lenches Ridge ECA is to protect and enhance the hedgerow field boundaries and tree cover pattern, while respecting the characteristic local enclosure pattern. Development of the site would have to accord with Local Plan Policy SWDP 5: Green Infrastructure, where Housing development proposals (including mixed-use schemes) are required to contribute towards the provision, maintenance, improvement and connectivity of Green Infrastructure.
Agricultural Land Land classified as the best and most versatile agricultural land (Grades 1,2 or 3a) None
Development of the site will lead to loss of agricultural land. However, the land is not designated within the agricultural land classification.
Heritage considerations
Question Assessment guidelines
Comments
Is the site within or adjacent to one or more of the following heritage designations or assets?
• Conservation area • Scheduled monument • Registered Park and Garden • Registered Battlefield • Listed buildings • Known archaeology • Locally listed building
Adjacent/nearby
The site is located adjacent to the Harvington conservation area, whereby development would have to consider the sensitivities of the built heritage setting of the area in line with Local Plan Policy. An increase of traffic coming from Site B would have potential impacts on CA and Grade II listed buildings.
Community facilities and services
4
Is the site, in general terms, close/accessible to local amenities such as (but not limited to):
• Town centre/local centre/shop • Employment location • Public transport • School(s) • Open space/recreation/ leisure
facilities • Health facilities • Cycle route(s)
Where a site is poorly located if > 800m, moderately located if 400m to 800m, and favourably located if < 400m from services. Moderately
Located
Observations and comments
The site is located in an accessible location to local village amenities and services.
The area provides bus services to surrounding towns and cities from the nearest bus stop on Station Road, 120m away from the site.
There is a primary school in the village, recreational and open space, and health facilities nearby.
There is no significant recreational and open space in the village, and no major shopping facilities or local centre providing community facilities.
Harvington also provides bus services into the town of Evesham, providing locals with town centre shopping and services within a 30 minute journey. The nearest health centre is located in Evesham. From Evesham, Worcester is accessible by rail, providing city centre services and attractions.
Other key considerations
Are there any Tree Preservation Orders on the site?
None
Would development lead to the loss of habitats with the potential to support protected species, for example mature trees, woodland, hedgerows and waterbodies?
Low / Unknown
There are no designated nature assets, wildlife sites, dedicated woodlands, or tree protection orders that would constrain development on the site. A detailed ecological assessment however should be carried out before the submission of any planning application.
Public Right of Way No
Existing social or community value (provide details) No
Is the site likely to be affected by any of the following?
Yes No Comments
Ground Contamination
Unknown. An assessment would need to be
undertaken; however it is unlikely that there is significant ground contamination given that the land is greenfield.
Significant infrastructure crossing the site i.e. power lines/ pipe lines, or in close proximity to hazardous installations
5
Characteristics
Characteristics which may affect development on the site:
Comments
Topography: Flat/ gentle slope/ steep gradient
Site slopes from west to east
Coalescence Development would result in neighbouring settlements merging into one another.
No
Scale and nature of development would be large enough to significantly change size and character of settlement
No
Any other comments? The site is outside the settlement boundary and so proposed development would conflict with Policy SWDP 2 with regard to permitting residential development in open countryside.
3.0. Availability Assessing the suitability of the site will give an indication of whether the site has any constraints to development. It should consider aspects such as infrastructure, planning policy, local services, heritage and other considerations.
Availability
Yes No Comments
Is the site available for sale or development (if known)? Please provide supporting evidence.
Are there any known legal or ownership problems such as unresolved multiple ownerships, ransom strips, covenants, tenancies, or operational requirements of landowners?
Unknown.
Is there a known time frame for availability? 0-5 /6-10 / 11-15 years.
Unknown.
4.0. Summary Assessing the suitability of the site will give an indication of whether the site has any constraints to development. It should consider aspects such as infrastructure, planning policy, local services, heritage and other considerations.
Conclusions
Please tick a box
The site is appropriate for allocation
This site has minor constraints
The site has significant constraints
The site is not appropriate for allocation
6
Potential housing development capacity - 30 dph in accordance with Policy SWDP 13: 64
Key evidence (3-4 bullet points) for decision to accept or discount site.
• Site is moderately located on eastern edge of the village, however within walking distance of village amenities;
• Views of the site from surrounds would impact on character of village, it’s rural setting and views of landmarks within Conservation Area;
• The site is adjacent to the Harvington Conservation area. Proposed development would have to consider sensitive design to mitigate impacts on built heritage in accordance with Local Plan policy;
• Eastern edge of site is within Flood Zone 3, whereby the developable area of the site would potentially have to be reduced and flood risk assessment undertaken for proposed development;
• Site is outside the settlement boundary, whereby the principal of development is not permitted in accordance with Policy SWDP 2. A settlement boundary review would have to be undertaken to allocate Site A within the Neighbourhood Plan.
1
Site Assessment Proforma General information
Site Reference / name C
Site Address (or brief description of broad location)
Land to the North of Crest Hill, Harvington
Current use Agricultural
Proposed use Housing
Gross area (Ha) Total area of the site in hectares
0.70
SHLAA site reference (if applicable)
46-03
Method of site identification (e.g. proposed by landowner etc.)
2016 call for sites
Context
Is the site: Greenfield: land (farmland, or open space, that has not previously been developed) Brownfield: Previously developed land which is or was occupied by a permanent structure, including the curtilage of the developed land and any associated infrastructure.
Greenfield
Brownfield
Mixture
Unknown
Site planning history Have there been any previous applications for development on this land? What was the outcome?
None apparent
Suitability
Site Characteristics
Is the current access adequate for the proposed development? If not, is there potential for access to be provided?
No. It is not apparent where access to the site is or potential access to the site could be.
Is the site accessible? Provide details of site’s connectivity
Site is on edge of village. Site is approximately 3.5km from the A46. Site is 450m from nearest bus stop.
Environmental Considerations
Questions Assessment guidelines
Observations and comments
Is the site within or adjacent to the following
2
policy or environmental designations:
• Green Belt • Ancient Woodland • Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
(AONB) • National Park • European nature site (Special Area of
Conservation or Special Protection Area) • SSSI Impact Risk Zone • Site of Importance for Nature
Conservation • Site of Geological Importance • Flood Zones 2 or 3
Site lies within Impact Risk Zone of one/two
SSSIs
The site lies within the far outer impact risk zone of Windmill Hill SSSI, which is considered distant enough for this to be only a minor constraint; Natural England should nevertheless be consulted with respect to any planning applications.
Ecological value? Could the site be home to protected species such as bats, great crested newts, badgers etc.? Unknown
There could be potential for protected species; ecological survey would be required ahead of any planning application.
Landscape and Visual Impact Is the site low, medium or high sensitivity in terms of landscape and visual impact? Low sensitivity: site not visible or less visible from surrounding locations, existing landscape or townscape character is poor quality, existing features could be retained Medium sensitivity: development of the site would lead to a moderate impact on landscape or townscape character due to visibility from surrounding locations and/or impacts on the character of the location. (e.g. in built up area); High sensitivity: Development would be within an area of high quality landscape or townscape character, and/or would significantly detract from local character. Development would lead to the loss of important features of local distinctiveness- without the possibility of mitigation.
Medium landscape sensitivity
Medium visual impact
The Worcestershire County Council Landscape Character Assessment classifies the site as ‘village farmlands with orchards’.
Development of the farmland at the site can be classified as medium sensitivity as development would have a moderate impact on the existing land and views from neighbouring housing across the site.
Development on the site may affect the area’s existing rural character.
Agricultural Land Land classified as the best and most versatile agricultural land (Grades 1,2 or 3a) None
Developing on the site will lead to loss of agricultural land. However, the land is not designated within the agricultural land classification.
Heritage considerations
Question Assessment guidelines
Comments
Is the site within or adjacent to one or more of the following heritage designations or assets?
• Conservation area
Limited or no impact or no requirement for
mitigation
The site is located near the Harvington conservation area.
3
• Scheduled monument • Registered Park and Garden • Registered Battlefield • Listed building • Known archaeology • Locally listed building
Community facilities and services
Is the site, in general terms, close/accessible to local amenities such as (but not limited to):
• Town centre/local centre/shop • Employment location • Public transport • School(s) • Open space/recreation/ leisure
facilities • Health facilities • Cycle route(s)
Where a site is poorly located if > 800m, moderately located if 400m to 800m, and favourably located if < 400m from services.
Moderately Located
Observations and comments
The site is located on the eastern edge of the village, but in a moderately accessible location to local village amenities and services.
The area provides bus services to surrounding towns and cities from the nearest bus stop on Station Road, 450m away from the site.
There is a primary school in the village, recreational and open space, and health facilities nearby.
Harvington also provides bus services to the town of Evesham, providing locals with town centre shopping and services within a 30 minute journey. The nearest health centre is located in Evesham. From Evesham, Worcester is accessible by rail, providing city centre services and attractions.
Other key considerations
Are there any Tree Preservation Orders on the site?
None
Would development lead to the loss of habitats with the potential to support protected species, for example mature trees, woodland, hedgerows and waterbodies?
Low / Unknown
There are no designated nature assets, wildlife sites, dedicated woodlands, or tree protection orders that would constrain development on the site. A detailed ecological assessment however should be carried out before the submission of any planning application.
Public Right of Way Yes There is a public right of way along the northern boundary of the site.
Existing social or community value (provide details) No The site has a public right of way that could be used as a
recreational amenity by villagers.
Is the site likely to be affected by any of the following?
Yes No Comments
Ground Contamination
Unknown. An assessment would need to be
undertaken; however it is unlikely that there is significant ground contamination given that the land is greenfield.
4
Significant infrastructure crossing the site i.e. power lines/ pipe lines, or in close proximity to hazardous installations
Unknown.
Characteristics
Characteristics which may affect development on the site:
Comments
Topography: Flat/ gentle slope/ steep gradient
Site slopes steeply downward from west to east.
Coalescence Development would result in neighbouring settlements merging into one another.
No
Scale and nature of development would be large enough to significantly change size and character of settlement
No
Any other comments? The site is outside the settlement boundary and so proposed development would conflict with Policy SWDP 2 with regard to permitting residential development in open countryside.
3.0. Availability Assessing the suitability of the site will give an indication of whether the site has any constraints to development. It should consider aspects such as infrastructure, planning policy, local services, heritage and other considerations.
Availability
Yes No Comments
Is the site available for sale or development (if known)? Please provide supporting evidence.
Are there any known legal or ownership problems such as unresolved multiple ownerships, ransom strips, covenants, tenancies, or operational requirements of landowners?
Unknown
Is there a known time frame for availability? 0-5 /6-10 / 11-15 years.
Unknown
4.0. Summary Assessing the suitability of the site will give an indication of whether the site has any constraints to development. It should consider aspects such as infrastructure, planning policy, local services, heritage and other considerations.
Conclusions
Please tick a box
The site is appropriate for allocation
5
This site has minor constraints
The site has significant constraints
The site is not appropriate for allocation
Potential housing development capacity - 30 dph in accordance with Policy SWDP 13: 21
Key evidence (3-4 bullet points) for decision to accept or discount site.
• Site is located on eastern edge of the village, however within walking distance of village amenities;
• Site is located on a sloping gradient downward from west to east;
• Site is outside the settlement boundary, whereby the principal of development is not permitted in accordance with Policy SWDP 2. A settlement boundary review would have to be undertaken to allocate Site A within the Neighbourhood Plan.
1
Site Assessment Proforma General information
Site Reference / name D
Site Address (or brief description of broad location)
Land between Crest Hill and Station Road, Harvington
Current use Overgrown former pear orchard
Proposed use Housing
Gross area (Ha) Total area of the site in hectares
1.46
SHLAA site reference (if applicable)
46-03
Method of site identification (e.g. proposed by landowner etc.)
Unknown – did not come forward in the call for sites.
Context
Is the site: Greenfield: land (farmland, or open space, that has not previously been developed) Brownfield: Previously developed land which is or was occupied by a permanent structure, including the curtilage of the developed land and any associated infrastructure.
Greenfield
Brownfield
Mixture
Unknown
2
Site planning history Have there been any previous applications for development on this land? What was the outcome?
None
Suitability
Site Characteristics
Is the current access adequate for the proposed development? If not, is there potential for access to be provided?
Access to the site is not adequate. Access is through a single carriageway laneway off Station Road. This laneway services two other sites currently under construction and a private residence.
Is the site accessible? Provide details of site’s connectivity
Site is approximately 4km from the A46. Site is in close proximity to a bus stop.
Environmental Considerations
Questions Assessment guidelines
Observations and comments
Is the site within or adjacent to the following policy or environmental designations:
• Green Belt • Ancient Woodland • Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
(AONB) • National Park • European nature site (Special Area of
Conservation or Special Protection Area) • SSSI Impact Risk Zone • Site of Importance for Nature
Conservation • Site of Geological Importance • Flood Zones 2 or 3
Site lies within Impact Risk Zone of one/two
SSSIs
The site is classified within The site lies within the far outer impact risk zone of Windmill Hill SSSI, which is considered distant enough for this to be only a minor constraint; Natural England should nevertheless be consulted with respect to any planning applications.
Ecological value? Could the site be home to protected species such as bats, great crested newts, badgers etc.? Unknown
There could be potential for protected species; ecological survey would be required ahead of any planning application.
Landscape and Visual Impact Is the site low, medium or high sensitivity in terms of landscape and visual impact? Low sensitivity: site not visible or less visible from surrounding locations, existing landscape or townscape character is poor quality, existing features could be retained Medium sensitivity: development of the site would lead to a moderate impact on landscape or townscape character due to visibility from surrounding locations
Medium landscape sensitivity
Medium visual impact
The Worcestershire County Council Landscape Character Assessment classifies the site as ‘village farmlands with orchards’.
Site is on higher ground than Crest Hill road and so proposed development has potential to be seen from the village. Views of the site from north of the village are screened by trees, however
3
and/or impacts on the character of the location. (e.g. in built up area); High sensitivity: Development would be within an area of high quality landscape or townscape character, and/or would significantly detract from local character. Development would lead to the loss of important features of local distinctiveness- without the possibility of mitigation.
site is adjacent to common area used by community as a walking amenity.
Development on the site may affect the area’s existing rural character.
Site is in the Environmental Character Area (ECA) of Lenches Ridge. The strategic Green Infrastructure approach for the Lenches Ridge ECA is to protect and enhance the hedgerow field boundaries and tree cover pattern, while respecting the characteristic local enclosure pattern. Development of the site would have to accord with Local Plan Policy SWDP 5: Green Infrastructure, where Housing development proposals (including mixed-use schemes) are required to contribute towards the provision, maintenance, improvement and connectivity of Green Infrastructure.
Agricultural Land Land classified as the best and most versatile agricultural land (Grades 1,2 or 3a) None
Development of the site will lead to loss of agricultural land. However, the land is not designated within the agricultural land classification.
Heritage considerations
Question Assessment guidelines
Comments
Is the site within or adjacent to one or more of the following heritage designations or assets?
• Conservation area • Scheduled monument • Registered Park and Garden • Registered Battlefield • Listed building • Known archaeology • Locally listed building
Limited or no impact or no requirement for
mitigation
The site is located near the Harvington conservation area.
Community facilities and services
Is the site, in general terms, close/accessible to local amenities such as (but not limited to):
• Town centre/local centre/shop
Moderately Located
Observations and comments
The site is located in an accessible location to local village amenities and
4
• Employment location • Public transport • School(s) • Open space/recreation/ leisure
facilities • Health facilities • Cycle route(s)
Where a site is poorly located if > 800m, moderately located if 400m to 800m, and favourably located if < 400m from services.
services.
The area provides bus services to surrounding towns and cities from the nearest bus stop on Station Road, 190 away from the site.
There is a primary school in the village, recreational and open space, and health facilities nearby.
Harvington also provides bus services into the town of Evesham, providing locals with town centre shopping and services within a 30 minute journey. The nearest health centre is located in Evesham. From Evesham, Worcester is accessible by rail, providing city centre services and attractions.
Other key considerations
Are there any Tree Preservation Orders on the site?
None
Would development lead to the loss of habitats with the potential to support protected species, for example mature trees, woodland, hedgerows and waterbodies?
Low / Unknown
There are no designated nature assets, wildlife sites, dedicated woodlands, or tree protection orders that would constrain development on the site, however is overgrown with trees and vegetation and so a detailed ecological assessment should be carried out before the submission of any planning application.
Public Right of Way No
Existing social or community value (provide details) No
Is the site likely to be affected by any of the following?
Yes No Comments
Ground Contamination
Unknown. An assessment would need to be
undertaken; however it is unlikely that there is significant ground contamination given that the land is greenfield.
Significant infrastructure crossing the site i.e. power lines/ pipe lines, or in close proximity to hazardous installations
Powerlines cross the site.
Characteristics
Characteristics which may affect development on the site:
Comments
Topography: Flat/ gentle slope/ steep gradient
Flat plateau
5
Coalescence Development would result in neighbouring settlements merging into one another.
No
Scale and nature of development would be large enough to significantly change size and character of settlement
No
Any other comments? The site is outside the settlement boundary and so proposed development would conflict with Policy SWDP 2 with regard to permitting residential development in open countryside.
3.0. Availability Assessing the suitability of the site will give an indication of whether the site has any constraints to development. It should consider aspects such as infrastructure, planning policy, local services, heritage and other considerations.
Availability
Yes No Comments
Is the site available for sale or development (if known)? Please provide supporting evidence.
Unknown
Are there any known legal or ownership problems such as unresolved multiple ownerships, ransom strips, covenants, tenancies, or operational requirements of landowners?
Unknown
Is there a known time frame for availability? 0-5 /6-10 / 11-15 years.
Unknown
4.0. Summary Assessing the suitability of the site will give an indication of whether the site has any constraints to development. It should consider aspects such as infrastructure, planning policy, local services, heritage and other considerations.
Conclusions
Please tick a box
The site is appropriate for allocation
This site has minor constraints
The site has significant constraints
The site is not appropriate for allocation
Potential housing development capacity - 30 dph in accordance with Policy SWDP 13: 44
Key evidence (3-4 bullet points) for decision to accept or discount site.
• Site is favourably located on northern edge of the village, and within walking distance of village amenities;
• Site is outside the settlement boundary, whereby the principal of development is not permitted in accordance with Policy SWDP 2. A settlement boundary review would
6
have to be undertaken to allocate Site A within the Neighbourhood Plan;
• The site is close to the Harvington Conservation area and would have to consider sensitive design proposals in accordance with Local Plan policy;
• Site is heavily vegetated and would require an ecological assessment;
• The 2015 South Worcestershire SHLAA indicates the site is available
1
Site Assessment Proforma General information
Site Reference / name J
Site Address (or brief description of broad location)
Land to the East of Evesham Road, Harvington
Current use Agricultural
Proposed use Housing
Gross area (Ha) Total area of the site in hectares
3.62
SHLAA site reference (if applicable)
46-09a
Method of site identification (e.g. proposed by landowner etc.)
NP Steering Group
Context
Is the site: Greenfield: land (farmland, or open space, that has not previously been developed) Brownfield: Previously developed land which is or was occupied by a permanent structure, including the curtilage of the developed land and any associated infrastructure.
Greenfield
Brownfield
Mixture
Unknown
2
Site planning history Have there been any previous applications for development on this land? What was the outcome?
Application No: W/16/01485/OU (Land to the East of Evesham Road, Harvington) – Outline planning application for 155 dwellings (demolition of existing outbuildings). Application refused. Registered 10/06/2017. Application No: W/14/02434/OU (Land to East of Evesham Road, Harvington) – Outline application for 190 dwellings and demolition of existing outbuildings. Application refused. Registered. Appeal withdrawn. 05/11/2014. Application No: W/16/00322/OU (Land to East of Evesham Road, Harvington) – Outline application for 155 dwellings (demolition of existing outbuildings). Application refused. Appeal withdrawn. Registered 05/02/2016.
Suitability
Site Characteristics
Is the current access adequate for the proposed development? If not, is there potential for access to be provided?
There is an access point to the site from Evesham Road, which would require further consultation with the highways authority. There is also potential for access through Site A, should Site A come forward for development.
Is the site accessible? Provide details of site’s connectivity
The site is accessible from Evesham Road (B4088) through the existing farm entrance. There is also potential to create an new access point closer to the village on Evesham Rd. The site is 3.5km from the A44.
Environmental Considerations
Questions Assessment guidelines
Observations and comments
Is the site within or adjacent to the following policy or environmental designations:
• Green Belt • Ancient Woodland • Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
(AONB) • National Park • European nature site (Special Area of
Conservation or Special Protection Area) • SSSI Impact Risk Zone • Site of Importance for Nature
Conservation • Site of Geological Importance • Flood Zones 2 or 3
Site lies within Impact Risk Zone of one/two
SSSIs
The site is classified within The site lies within the far outer impact risk zone of Windmill Hill SSSI, which is considered distant enough for this to be only a minor constraint; Natural England should nevertheless be consulted with respect to any planning applications.
Ecological value? Could the site be home to protected species such as bats, great crested newts, badgers etc.? Unknown
There could be potential for protected species; ecological survey would be required ahead of any planning application.
Landscape and Visual Impact
High landscape sensitivity
The Worcestershire County Council Landscape Character
3
Is the site low, medium or high sensitivity in terms of landscape and visual impact? Low sensitivity: site not visible or less visible from surrounding locations, existing landscape or townscape character is poor quality, existing features could be retained Medium sensitivity: development of the site would lead to a moderate impact on landscape or townscape character due to visibility from surrounding locations and/or impacts on the character of the location. (e.g. in built up area); High sensitivity: Development would be within an area of high quality landscape or townscape character, and/or would significantly detract from local character. Development would lead to the loss of important features of local distinctiveness- without the possibility of mitigation.
High visual impact
Assessment classifies the site as ‘village farmlands with orchards’.
Development of site would have an impact on views from Evesham Road into and across the site towards the church spire of the CA, and views further south and southeast towards the Cotswolds escarpment. From within the site there are panoramic views out of the site to the west, south-west and south towards the Malvern Hills and Cotswolds.
Site is in the Environmental Character Area (ECA) of Lenches Ridge. The strategic Green Infrastructure approach for the Lenches Ridge ECA is to protect and enhance the hedgerow field boundaries and tree cover pattern, while respecting the characteristic local enclosure pattern. Development of the site would have to accord with Local Plan Policy SWDP 5: Green Infrastructure, where Housing development proposals (including mixed-use schemes) are required to contribute towards the provision, maintenance, improvement and connectivity of Green Infrastructure.
Agricultural Land Land classified as the best and most versatile agricultural land (Grades 1,2 or 3a) None
Development of the site will lead to loss of agricultural land. However, the land is not designated as best and most versatile agricultural land.
Heritage considerations
Question Assessment guidelines
Comments
Is the site within or adjacent to one or more of the following heritage designations or assets?
• Conservation area • Scheduled monument • Registered Park and Garden • Registered Battlefield
Limited impact or no requirement for
mitigation
The site is located near the Harvington conservation area, and would impact on views of the CA from Evesham Road.
4
• Listed building • Known archaeology • Locally listed building
Community facilities and services
Is the site, in general terms, close/accessible to local amenities such as (but not limited to):
• Town centre/local centre/shop • Employment location • Public transport • School(s) • Open space/recreation/ leisure
facilities • Health facilities • Cycle route(s)
Where a site is poorly located if > 800m, moderately located if 400m to 800m, and favourably located if < 400m from services.
Moderately Located
Observations and comments
The site is located in a less accessible location to local village amenities and services.
The area provides bus services to Stratford Upon Avon from the nearest bus stop on Village Road. The bus stop is located over 300m away from the site through a public right of way.
There is a primary school in the village, recreational and open space, and health facilities nearby.
Harvington also provides bus services to the town of Evesham, providing locals with town centre shopping and services within a 30 minute journey. The nearest health centre is located in Evesham. From Evesham, Worcester is accessible by rail, providing city centre services and attractions.
Other key considerations
Are there any Tree Preservation Orders on the site?
None
Would development lead to the loss of habitats with the potential to support protected species, for example mature trees, woodland, hedgerows and waterbodies?
Low/ Unknown
There are no designated natural assets, wildlife sites, dedicated woodlands, or tree protection orders that would constrain development on the site. A detailed ecological assessment should be carried out before the submission of any planning application.
Public Right of Way None
Existing social or community value (provide details) No
Is the site likely to be affected by any of the following?
Yes No Comments
Ground Contamination
Unknown. An assessment would need to be
undertaken; however it is unlikely that there is significant ground contamination given that the land is greenfield.
Significant infrastructure crossing the site i.e. power lines/ pipe lines, or in close proximity to hazardous installations
Powerlines run along the southern boundary of the site.
5
Characteristics
Characteristics which may affect development on the site:
Comments
Topography: Flat/ gentle slope/ steep gradient
Gentle undulation
Coalescence Development would result in neighbouring settlements merging into one another.
No
Scale and nature of development would be large enough to significantly change size and character of settlement
Yes
Any other comments? The site is outside the settlement boundary and so proposed development would conflict with Policy SWDP 2 with regard to permitting residential development in open countryside.
3.0. Availability Assessing the suitability of the site will give an indication of whether the site has any constraints to development. It should consider aspects such as infrastructure, planning policy, local services, heritage and other considerations.
Availability
Yes No Comments
Is the site available for sale or development (if known)? Please provide supporting evidence.
Are there any known legal or ownership problems such as unresolved multiple ownerships, ransom strips, covenants, tenancies, or operational requirements of landowners?
Unknown
Is there a known time frame for availability? 0-5 /6-10 / 11-15 years.
Unknown
4.0. Summary Assessing the suitability of the site will give an indication of whether the site has any constraints to development. It should consider aspects such as infrastructure, planning policy, local services, heritage and other considerations.
Conclusions
Please tick a box
The site is appropriate for allocation
This site has minor constraints
The site has significant constraints
The site is not appropriate for allocation
6
Potential housing development capacity - 30 dph in accordance with Policy SWDP 13: 109
Key evidence (3-4 bullet points) for decision to accept or discount site.
• The site is not appropriate for development for growth of the village as the site would change the character of the village considerably at a scenic gateway to the village, expecially when there are other sites on urban edge that can integrate more readily with the size and character of settlement;
• Site would have impacts on views in, out and across the site of the natural assets of the Malvern Hills and Cotswold enscarpment, views that are synonymous with the area;
• Site is outside the settlement boundary, whereby the principal of development is not permitted in accordance with Policy SWDP 2. A settlement boundary review would have to be undertaken to allocate Site A within the Neighbourhood Plan.
1
Site Assessment Proforma General information
Site Reference / name K
Site Address (or brief description of broad location)
Land to the East of Evesham Road, Harvington
Current use Agricultural
Proposed use Housing
Gross area (Ha) Total area of the site in hectares
2.47
SHLAA site reference (if applicable)
46-09a
Method of site identification (e.g. proposed by landowner etc.)
Unknown
Context
Is the site: Greenfield: land (farmland, or open space, that has not previously been developed) Brownfield: Previously developed land which is or was occupied by a permanent structure, including the curtilage of the developed land and any associated infrastructure.
Greenfield
Brownfield
Mixture
Unknown
2
Site planning history Have there been any previous applications for development on this land? What was the outcome?
Application No: W/16/01485/OU (Land to the East of Evesham Road, Harvington) – Outline planning application for 155 dwellings (demolition of existing outbuildings). Application refused. Registered 10/06/2017. Application No: W/14/02434/OU (Land to East of Evesham Road, Harvington) – Outline application for 190 dwellings and demolition of existing outbuildings. Application refused. Registered. Appeal withdrawn. 05/11/2014. Application No: W/16/00322/OU (Land to East of Evesham Road, Harvington) – Outline application for 155 dwellings (demolition of existing outbuildings). Application refused. Appeal withdrawn. Registered 05/02/2016.
Suitability
Site Characteristics
Is the current access adequate for the proposed development? If not, is there potential for access to be provided?
Access can be provided in the southeast corner of the site from Hughes Close, however this would result in a considerable amount of traffic congestion coming through the residential area of Hughes Close. As the site is otherwise isolated from the village, access could be provided through Site A and/or Site J if they came forward for prior development.
Is the site accessible? Provide details of site’s connectivity
The site is within 300m of the nearest bus stop, with bus routes providing services to Stratford Upon Avon. The site is approximately 4km from the A44.
Environmental Considerations
Questions Assessment guidelines
Observations and comments
Is the site within or adjacent to the following policy or environmental designations:
• Green Belt • Ancient Woodland • Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
(AONB) • National Park • European nature site (Special Area of
Conservation or Special Protection Area) • SSSI Impact Risk Zone • Site of Importance for Nature
Conservation • Site of Geological Importance • Flood Zones 2 or 3
Site lies within Impact Risk Zone of one/two
SSSIs
The site is classified within The site lies within the far outer impact risk zone of Windmill Hill SSSI, which is considered distant enough for this to be only a minor constraint; Natural England should nevertheless be consulted with respect to any planning applications.
Ecological value? Could the site be home to protected species such as bats, great crested newts, badgers etc.? Unknown
There could be potential for protected species; ecological survey would be required ahead of any planning application.
3
Landscape and Visual Impact Is the site low, medium or high sensitivity in terms of landscape and visual impact? Low sensitivity: site not visible or less visible from surrounding locations, existing landscape or townscape character is poor quality, existing features could be retained Medium sensitivity: development of the site would lead to a moderate impact on landscape or townscape character due to visibility from surrounding locations and/or impacts on the character of the location. (e.g. in built up area); High sensitivity: Development would be within an area of high quality landscape or townscape character, and/or would significantly detract from local character. Development would lead to the loss of important features of local distinctiveness- without the possibility of mitigation.
Medium landscape sensitivity
Medium visual impact
The Worcestershire County Council Landscape Character Assessment classifies the site as ‘village farmlands with orchards’.
Development of the site would have a moderate impact on views from neighbouring housing and public right of way amenity users of surrounding hills west of the site.
Site is in the Environmental Character Area (ECA) of Lenches Ridge. The strategic Green Infrastructure approach for the Lenches Ridge ECA is to protect and enhance the hedgerow field boundaries and tree cover pattern, while respecting the characteristic local enclosure pattern. Development of the site would have to accord with Local Plan Policy SWDP 5: Green Infrastructure, where Housing development proposals (including mixed-use schemes) are required to contribute towards the provision, maintenance, improvement and connectivity of Green Infrastructure.
Agricultural Land Land classified as the best and most versatile agricultural land (Grades 1,2 or 3a) None
Developing on the site will lead to loss of agricultural land. However, the land is not designated as best and most versatile agricultural land.
Heritage considerations
Question Assessment guidelines
Comments
Is the site within or adjacent to one or more of the following heritage designations or assets?
• Conservation area • Scheduled monument • Registered Park and Garden • Registered Battlefield • Listed building • Known archaeology • Locally listed building
Limited impact or no requirement for
mitigation
The site is located near the Harvington conservation area, and adjacent to a street that has potential to be included as an extension of the conservation area.
4
Community facilities and services
Is the site, in general terms, close/accessible to local amenities such as (but not limited to):
• Town centre/local centre/shop • Employment location • Public transport • School(s) • Open space/recreation/ leisure
facilities • Health facilities • Cycle route(s)
Where a site is poorly located if > 800m, moderately located if 400m to 800m, and favourably located if < 400m from services.
Moderately Located
Observations and comments
The site is located in an accessible location to local village amenities and services.
The area provides bus services to Stratford Upon Avon from the nearest bus stop on village road, 300m away from the site.
There is a primary school in the village, recreational and open space, and health facilities nearby.
Harvington also provides bus services into the town of Evesham, providing locals with town centre shopping and services within a 30 minute journey. The nearest health centre is located in Evesham. From Evesham, Worcester is accessible by rail, providing city centre services and attractions.
Other key considerations
Are there any Tree Preservation Orders on the site?
None
Would development lead to the loss of habitats with the potential to support protected species, for example mature trees, woodland, hedgerows and waterbodies?
Low / Unknown
There are no designated nature assets, wildlife sites, dedicated woodlands, or tree protection orders that would constrain development on the site. A detailed ecological assessment should be carried out before the submission of any planning application.
Public Right of Way Yes There is a public access route along most of the boundary of the site.
Existing social or community value (provide details) No The site has a public right of way that could be used as a
recreational amenity by villagers.
Is the site likely to be affected by any of the following?
Yes No Comments
Ground Contamination
Unknown. An assessment would need to be undertaken; however it is unlikely that there is significant ground contamination given that the land is greenfield.
Significant infrastructure crossing the site i.e. power lines/ pipe lines, or in close proximity to hazardous installations
Powerlines run across the site.
Characteristics
5
Characteristics which may affect development on the site:
Comments
Topography: Flat/ gentle slope/ steep gradient
Flat
Coalescence Development would result in neighbouring settlements merging into one another.
No
Scale and nature of development would be large enough to significantly change size and character of settlement
No
Any other comments? The site is outside the settlement boundary and so proposed development would conflict with Policy SWDP 2 with regard to permitting residential development in open countryside.
3.0. Availability Assessing the suitability of the site will give an indication of whether the site has any constraints to development. It should consider aspects such as infrastructure, planning policy, local services, heritage and other considerations.
Availability
Yes No Comments
Is the site available for sale or development (if known)? Please provide supporting evidence.
Unknown
Are there any known legal or ownership problems such as unresolved multiple ownerships, ransom strips, covenants, tenancies, or operational requirements of landowners?
Unknown
Is there a known time frame for availability? 0-5 /6-10 / 11-15 years.
Unknown
4.0. Summary Assessing the suitability of the site will give an indication of whether the site has any constraints to development. It should consider aspects such as infrastructure, planning policy, local services, heritage and other considerations.
Conclusions
Please tick a box
The site is appropriate for allocation
This site has minor constraints
The site has significant constraints
The site is not appropriate for allocation
Potential housing development capacity - 30 74
6
dph in accordance with Policy SWDP 13:
Key evidence (3-4 bullet points) for decision to accept or discount site.
• Access issues exist due to potential likelihood of small residential roads been impacted by increased traffic congestion; Otherwise Site K is isolated from access to village Street, and would need Site A and/or Site J to come forward to provide access.
• Site is outside the settlement boundary, whereby the principal of development is not permitted in accordance with Policy SWDP 2. A settlement boundary review would have to be undertaken to allocate Site A within the Neighbourhood Plan..