site characterization reportbristol, pennsylvania 19007 submitted to: mr. bruce beitler ... mw-6 and...

Phone: (610) 279-7070

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC.500 EAST WASHINGTON STREETSUITE 375NORRISTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA 19401

SDMS DocID 2007361

Facsimile: (610)279-4334

SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT

ADDENDUM No. 1

STAINLESS INC.219 SOUTH NINTH STREET

BOROUGH OF PERKASIE, BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 18944

Prepared by:

Environmental Consulting, Inc.500 East Washington Street

Suite 375Norristown, Pennsylvania 19401

Prepared for:

Attention: Robert White, Executive DirectorThe Redevelopment Authority of the County of Bucks

One North Wilson AvenueBristol, Pennsylvania 19007

Submitted To:

Mr. Bruce BeitlerPennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Environmental Cleanup Program555 North Lane

Lee Park, Suite 6010Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428

juel J. Ku£ia,ce President

March 7, 2001

[PCHARO STANLEY WERNER'ichard S. Werner, P.O.resident

Project No. 2000.009

A R 0 0 0 3 5 I

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page

.ES-1

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

INTRODUCTION,1.1 Background.1.2 Objective

.1

.1

.3

GROUND WATER INVESTIGATION 42.1 Monitoring Well Installation Activities 42.2 December 19, 2000 Investigation 5

2.2.1 Sampling Activities 52.2.2 Discussion of Results 8

2.3 Specific Capacity Testing 102.4 January 17, 2001 Investigation 12

2.4.1 Sampling Activities 122.4.2 Discussion of Results 14

CONCLUSIONS 15

RECOMMENDATIONS 22

FIGURES

Figure 2-1 Groundwater Monitoring Well Location Plan 6Figure 2-2 Groundwater Contour Map (December 19,2000) 7Figure 2-3 Groundwater Contour Map (January 17, 2001) 13Figure 3-1 Groundwater Summary Plan 21

TABLES

Table 2-1 Summary of Groundwater Level Measurements (December 19, 2000) 8Table 2-2a Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results (December 19, 2000) 9Table 2-2b Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results (December 19, 2000) 10Table 2-3 Summary of Groundwater Level Measurements (January 17, 2001) 12Table 2-4 Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results (January 17, 2001) 14Table 3-1 MW-1 - Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results 16Table 3-2 MW-2 - Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results 16Table 3-3 MW-3 - Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results 16Table 3-4 MW-4 - Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results 16Table 3-5 MW-5 - Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results 17Table 3-6 MW-6 - Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results 17Table 3-7 MW-7 - Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results 18Table 3-8 MW-8 - Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results 18Table 3-9 MW-9 - Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results 18Table 3-10 MW-10 - Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results 19Table 3-11 MW-11 - Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results 20

i H R 0 0 0 3 5 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

APPENDICES

Appendix A Property Location MapAppendix B Borehole Logs/Monitoring Well Construction DetailsAppendix C December 19, 2000 Groundwater Sampling LogsAppendix D Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results (December 19, 2000)Appendix E Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results (January 17, 2001)

11 A R 0 0 0 3 5 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Environmental Consulting, Inc. prepared this site characterization report addendum No. 1 for theproperty known as the Stainless, Inc. property located at 219 South Ninth Street in the Borough ofPerkasie, Bucks County, Pennsylvania, referenced hereinafter as the subject property. This sitecharacterization report addendum No. 1 documents the additional groundwater investigation activitiesthat were completed on the subject property. The objective of this groundwater investigation was todetermine the vertical extent of contaminant constituents in the groundwater on the subject property andto conduct a specific capacity test on each of the three (3) newly installed bedrock groundwatermonitoring wells denoted as MW-9; MW-10; and MW-11.

From February, 2000 to June, 2000, Environmental Consulting, Inc. completed site characterizationactivities on the subject property, which included subsurface soil investigation activities andgroundwater investigation activities. The objective of these site characterization activities was toestablish the contaminant concentrations in the subsurface soil and groundwater on the subject property.

As part of the subsurface soil investigation, Environmental Consulting, Inc. advanced fifteen (15) soilborings on the subject property. One (1) subsurface soil sample was collected from each of the fifteen(15) soil borings.

Prior to initiation of the groundwater investigation activities, Environmental Consulting, Inc. concludedthat the groundwater monitoring wells denoted as MW-2; MW-5; MW-6; MW-7; and MW-8, whichwere installed as part of previous investigation activities on the subject property, were still insatisfactory condition for use as groundwater monitoring wells. As part of the groundwaterinvestigation, Environmental Consulting, Inc. installed three (3) groundwater monitoring wells, denotedas MW-1; MW-3; and MW-4, on the subject property. On April 12, 2000, Environmental Consulting,Inc. completed a groundwater sampling and analysis event which included the eight (8) groundwatermonitoring wells located on the subject property (i.e., MW-1 through MW-8).

Based on the site characterization activities completed on the subject property from February, 2000 toJune, 2000, Environmental Consulting, Inc. concluded the following:

• The subsurface soil laboratory analytical results were reported to be either not detected ("ND")above laboratory reported detection limits or less than Pennsylvania Department of EnvironmentalProtection ("PADEP") statewide health standards for soil.

• The groundwater laboratory analytical results reported concentrations of the following compoundsabove PADEP groundwater standards:

• 1,2-Dichloroethane in MW-5, which is located in the shallow water-bearing zone;• cis-l,2-Dichloroethene in MW-5, which is located in the shallow water-bearing zone;• Tetrachloroethene ("PCE") in MW-5, which is located in the shallow water-bearing zone; and• Trichloroethene ("TCE") in MW-5 and MW-6, which are located in the shallow water-bearing

zone.

Based on the groundwater laboratory analytical results, Environmental Consulting, Inc. initiatedadditional groundwater investigation activities which included the installation of three (3) bedrockgroundwater monitoring wells, denoted as MW-9; MW-10; and MW-11. These three (3) bedrockgroundwater monitoring wells were installed to determine the vertical extent of the documentedgroundwater contaminant plume on the subject property. On December 19, 2000, Environmental

FS 1A R 0 0 0 3 5 U

Consulting, Inc. completed a groundwater sampling and analysis event which included the sampling andanalysis of the eight (8) shallow water-bearing zone groundwater monitoring wells (i.e., MW-1 throughMW-8) and the three (3) newly installed bedrock aquifer groundwater monitoring wells (i.e., MW-9;MW-10; and MW-11). The eleven (11) groundwater samples were submitted to a Pennsylvania-certified laboratory for TCL VOCs analysis.

The laboratory analytical results of Environmental Consulting, Inc.'s additional groundwaterinvestigation, reported concentrations of the following compounds above PADEP (PennsylvaniaDepartment of Environmental Protection) groundwater standards:

• cis-l,2-Dichloroethene in MW-5 and MW-6, which are located in the shallow water-bearing zone;• PCE in MW-5 and MW-6, which are located in the shallow water-bearing zone and MW-10 and

MW-11, which are located in the bedrock aquifer; and• TCE in MW-5, MW-6 and MW-8, which are located in the shallow water-bearing zone and in MW-

9, MW-10 and MW-11, which are located in the bedrock aquifer.

Environmental Consulting, Inc. presents the following recommendations to address the findings of theadditional groundwater investigation activities completed on the subject property:

• Continue quarterly groundwater sampling and analysis activities of the eleven (11) groundwatermonitoring wells (i.e., MW-1 through MW-11) on the subject property.

• Prepare and submit a remedial action plan ("RAP") to address the contaminant constituentconcentrations in the groundwater on the subject property pursuant to the PADEP Land RecyclingProgram (i.e., Act 2).

ES'2 A R 0 0 0 3 5 5

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Environmental Consulting, Inc. prepared this site characterization report addendum No. 1 to determinethe vertical extent of the documented groundwater contaminant plume on the Stainless Inc. propertylocated at 219 South Ninth Street in the Borough of Perkasie, Bucks County, Pennsylvania, referencedhereinafter as the subject property. This site characterization report documents information that wasobtained through March 7,2001.

1.1 Background

The subject property is located on the Telford, Pennsylvania United States Geological Survey("USGS") 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle at N 40° 22' 24.28" latitude and W 75° 18' 1.26"longitude. A copy of a portion of the USGS quadrangle map identifying the location of thesubject property is included as Appendix A.

On February 21, 2000, Environmental Consulting, Inc. submitted a work plan to thePennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection ("PADEP") to perform initial sitecharacterization activities to establish the contaminant concentrations in the subsurface soil andgroundwater on the subject property. Environmental Consulting, Inc. received approval from thePADEP on March 6, 2000 and March 10, 2000.

In June, 1990, the Bucks County Health Department was initially notified of an apparent oil seepinto the stream along the eastern portion of the subject property. Based on this discovery, aproduct recovery trench was installed along the southeastern portion of the subject property torecover the oil. In June, 1990 GHR/Hauffler removed product lines that lead from an fuel oilaboveground storage tank ("AST") along the eastern portion of the subject property.GHR/Hauffler also removed contaminated soil that was encountered during the removal of thesefuel oil product lines.

During the installation of the product recovery trench in June, 1990, GHR/Hauffler encountereda terra cotta pipe which discharged a fluid with an apparent turpentine odor. Based on thediscovery of this terra cotta pipe, GHR/Hauffler performed investigation activities (i.e., test pitsand trench excavations) on the subject property to determine the extent of soil contamination inSeptember, 1990 and October, 1990. These investigation activities identified one (1)approximate 2,000-gallon underground storage tank ("UST") on the western portion of thesubject property and one (1) subsurface vat at the eastern portion of the subject property.GHR/Hauffler identified apparent solvent contamination in the soil adjacent to the vat.

In March, 1991, GHR/Hauffler installed three (3) groundwater monitoring wells, which weredenoted as MW-1 through MW-3, in the vicinity of the approximate 2,000-gallon UST on thewestern portion of the subject property. In April, 1991, GHR/Hauffler closed the approximate2,000-gallon UST in-place with grout.

In November, 1991, GHR/Hauffler installed five (5) additional groundwater monitoring wells,which were denoted as MW-4 through MW-8, on the eastern and southern portion of the subjectproperty. In November, 1991, GHR/Hauffler performed groundwater sampling and analysisactivities on the eight (8) groundwater monitoring wells (i.e., MW-1 through MW-8).Groundwater flow direction was determined to be to the southeast on the subject property. Thegroundwater laboratory analytical results for trichloroethene ("TCE") were reported at 6,030

1 AR000356

micrograms per liter (>g/L"), 157 ^g/L and 5,430 ng/L in MW-5, MW-6 and MW-8,respectively. In addition, cis-l,2-dichloroethene was reported at 394 (ig/L in MW-6.

In June, 1992, GHR/Hauffler completed a second round of groundwater sampling and analysisactivities. Groundwater flow direction was determined to be to the southeast on the subjectproperty. The groundwater laboratory analytical results for TCE were reported at 1,400 jig/L,1,200 jig/L, 8.2 ng/L and 4,400 jig/L in MW-5, MW-6, MW-7 and MW-8, respectively. Inaddition, cis-l,2-dichloroethene was reported at 110 ^g/L in MW-6 and 50 |ag/L in MW-8 andbenzene was reported at 300 |ig/L in MW-6.

Based on the documented contamination on the subject property, Environmental Consulting, Inc.completed site characterization activities, which included subsurface soil investigation activitiesand groundwater investigation activities. The objective of the site characterization was toestablish the contaminant concentrations in the subsurface soil and groundwater on the subjectproperty.

As part of the subsurface soil investigation, Environmental Consulting, Inc. advanced fifteen(15) soil borings on the subject property. One (1) subsurface soil sample was collected fromeach of the fifteen (15) soil borings. The fifteen (15) subsurface soil samples were submitted to aPennsylvania-certified laboratory for target compound list ("TCL") volatile organic compounds("VOCs") analysis and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons ("PAHs") analysis. The TCL VOCslaboratory analytical results and the PAHs laboratory analytical results were reported to be eithernot detected ("ND") above laboratory reported detection limits or less than PADEP statewidehealth standards for soil.

Prior to initiation of the groundwater investigation activities, Environmental Consulting, Inc.concluded that the groundwater monitoring wells denoted as MW-2; MW-5; MW-6; MW-7; andMW-8, which were installed as part of previous investigation activities on the subject property,were still in satisfactory condition for use as groundwater monitoring wells. As part of thegroundwater investigation, Environmental Consulting, Inc. installed three (3) groundwatermonitoring wells denoted as MW-1, MW-3 and MW-4 on the subject property. On April 12,2000, Environmental Consulting, Inc. completed a groundwater sampling and analysis eventwhich included the eight (8) groundwater monitoring wells located on the subject property (i.e.,MW-1 through MW-8). The eight (8) groundwater samples were submitted to a Pennsylvania-certified laboratory for TCL VOCs analysis and PAHs analysis.

Based on the subsurface soil laboratory analytical results, the soil on the subject property doesnot contain concentrations of TCL VOCs or PAHs above PADEP statewide health standards forsoil.

Based on the groundwater laboratory analytical results, the groundwater in the vicinity of MW-5and MW-6, which are located at the southeastern portion of the subject property, containsconcentrations of the following compounds above PADEP statewide health standards forgroundwater:

• 1,2-Dichloroethane in MW-5, which is located in the shallow water-bearing zone;• cis-l,2-Dichloroethene in MW-5, which is located in the shallow water-bearing zone;• Tetrachloroethene ("PCE") in MW-5, which is located in the shallow water-bearing

zone; and• TCE in MW-5 and MW-6, which are located in the shallow water-bearing zone.

2 A R 0 0 0 3 5 7

1.2 Objective

The objective of this site characterization addendum No. 1 was to determine the vertical extent ofcontaminant constituent concentrations in the groundwater on the subject property and toconduct a specific capacity test on each of the newly installed bedrock groundwater monitoringwells.

AR000358

2.0 GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION

2.1 Monitoring Well Installation Activities

Environmental Consulting, Inc. retained B.L. Myers Bros. ("B.L. Myers") of Glenmoore,Pennsylvania to install three (3) bedrock groundwater monitoring wells denoted as MW-9; MW-10; and MW-11 on the subject property. The groundwater monitoring well locations areillustrated in Figure 2-1. These three (3) groundwater monitoring wells were installed to monitorthe bedrock aquifer in an attempt to delineate the vertical extent of contaminant constituentconcentrations in the groundwater on the subject property.

On November 29, 2000, B.L. Myers advanced a 10-inch pneumatic hammer to approximately 20feet below ground surface ("bgs") in the borehole associated with the groundwater monitoringwell denoted as MW-9. Six-inch steel casing was tremie grouted into the borehole and allowedto cure overnight. The steel casing was placed into the borehole to case off the shallow water-bearing zone. On November 30, 2000, a six-inch pneumatic hammer was advanced within thesix-inch steel casing to an approximate depth of 60 feet bgs. A water-bearing fracture less than 1gallon per minute ("gpm") was encountered at approximately 29 feet bgs to 31 feet bgs. Awater-bearing fracture greater than 2 gpm was encountered at approximately 49 feet bgs to 50feet bgs. The groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-9 was constructed with 32 feet of 2-inch diameter, schedule 40, threaded PVC, machine slotted, 0.010-inch slot well screen attachedto a 2-inch diameter PVC riser pipe. The well screen was sand packed using #1 size sand in theannular space to approximately 1 foot above the screened interval. An approximate 2-foot layerof bentonite seal was added to the top of the filter pack. The remaining annular space was filledwith a portland cement/bentonite mixture and a flush-mounted protective cover was installed atthe surface. The location of the groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-9 is illustrated onFigure 2-1. The borehole log/monitoring well construction detail is included in Appendix B.

On November 29, 2000, B.L. Myers advanced a 10-inch pneumatic hammer to approximately 20feet bgs in the borehole associated with the groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-10.Six-inch steel casing was tremie grouted into the borehole and allowed to cure overnight. Thesteel casing was placed into the borehole to case off the shallow water-bearing zone. OnNovember 30, 2000, a six-inch pneumatic hammer was advanced within the six-inch steel casingto an approximate depth of 80 feet bgs. No water-bearing fractures greater than 2 gpm wereencountered within the borehole to a depth of 80 feet bgs. Upon completion of the borehole toapproximately 80 feet bgs, Environmental Consulting, Inc. "blew-out" approximately 5 gallonsof water from the borehole. The groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-10 wasconstructed with 30 feet of 2-inch diameter, schedule 40, threaded PVC, machine slotted, 0.010-inch slot well screen attached to a 2-inch diameter PVC riser pipe. The well screen was sandpacked using #1 size sand in the annular space to approximately 2 feet above the screenedinterval. An approximate 4-foot layer of bentonite seal was added to the top of the filter pack.The remaining annular space was filled with a portland cement/bentonite mixture and a flush-mounted protective cover was installed at the surface. The location of the groundwatermonitoring well denoted as MW-10 is illustrated on Figure 2-1. The borehole log/monitoringwell construction detail is included in Appendix B.

On November 29, 2000, B.L. Myers advanced a 10-inch pneumatic hammer to approximately 20feet bgs in the borehole associated with the groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-11.Six-inch steel casing was tremie grouted into the borehole and allowed to cure overnight. Thesteel casing was placed into the borehole to case off the shallow water-bearing zone. On

AR000359

November 30, 2000, a six-inch pneumatic hammer was advanced within the six-inch steel casingto an approximate depth of 60 feet bgs. A water-bearing fracture greater than 2 gpm wasencountered at approximately 53 feet bgs to 54 feet bgs. No evidence of groundwater wasencountered above 53 feet bgs within the cased-off borehole. The groundwater monitoring welldenoted as MW-11 was constructed with 15 feet of 2-inch diameter, schedule 40, threaded PVC,machine slotted, 0.010-inch slot well screen attached to a 2-inch diameter PVC riser pipe. Thewell screen was sand packed using #1 size sand in the annular space to approximately 1 footabove the screened interval. An approximate 6-foot layer of bentonite seal was added to the topof the filter pack. The remaining annular space was filled with a portland cement/bentonitemixture and a flush-mounted protective cover was installed at the surface. The location of thegroundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-11 is illustrated on Figure 2-1. The boreholelog/monitoring well construction detail is included in Appendix B.

2.2 December 19,2000 Investigation

2.2.1 Sampling Activities

On December 19, 2000, Environmental Consulting, Inc. completed a groundwatersampling and analysis event utilizing PADEP approved procedures. Groundwatersamples were collected from the eleven (11) groundwater monitoring wells (i.e., MW-1through MW-11) located on the subject property (see Figure 2-1). Prior to sampling,depth to groundwater readings were obtained from the eleven (11) groundwatermonitoring wells using a Solinst Model 122 Interface Meter ("interface meter"). Theinterface meter has an infra-red circuit that detects the presence of a liquid. Aconductivity circuit differentiates between a conductive liquid, such as water, and a non-conductive liquid, such as floating petroleum product. Floating petroleum product wasnot encountered during the groundwater level measurements on December 19, 2000.Groundwater levels before purging in groundwater monitoring wells MW-1 throughMW-11 are summarized in Table 2-1.

Utilizing the groundwater elevation data from December 19, 2000, EnvironmentalConsulting, Inc. developed a groundwater contour map presented as Figure 2-2. Basedupon Figure 2-2, the inferred shallow water-bearing zone groundwater flow direction onDecember 19, 2000 is generally to the east/southeast with a hydraulic gradient of 0.025feet/foot on the eastern portion of the subject property. Based upon Figure 2-2, theinferred bedrock aquifer groundwater flow direction on December 19, 2000 is generallyto the south/southeast with a hydraulic gradient of 0.028 feet/foot on the subject property.

Environmental Consulting, Inc. collected groundwater samples from the eleven (11)groundwater monitoring wells utilizing PADEP approved procedures. These eleven (11)groundwater samples were poured into pre-labeled bottles from dedicated PVC bailers.Copies of the groundwater sampling logs for the eleven (11) groundwater monitoringwells are included in Appendix C.

The eleven (11) groundwater samples were submitted to a Pennsylvania-certifiedlaboratory for analysis of TCL VOCs. The eleven (11) groundwater samples were storedin an ice-filled cooler with an ambient temperature of 4°C until laboratory analysis.

A R 0 0 0 3 6 0

CO

£

PROPERTY LINE

AST

MW-4

/I

MW-9 <p'ti i5' if 1 1Inji I(I III I

I 1

'ACE VAT

81 .'

2-STORY BUILDINGW/ BASEMENT UNDER WOOD FLOOR

SLAB ON GRADE

Mtf-.< :,' . / 4 _V

-UST ABANDONED IN-PUCE

/ MW-10

MW-6

MW-1!

MW-5

BASEMENT W/CONCRETE FLOOR

MW-1

LEGENDU$Li - SHALLOW WATER-BEARING ZONE GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND NUMBER

- BEDROCK AQUIFER GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND NUMBER A R 0 0 0 3 6 I

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING. INC.500 EAST WASHINGTON STREETSUITE 375NORRISTOWN. PENNSYLVANIA 19401

JOB No.

2000.009DATE:

4/18/00

DRAWN BY!

ADHCHECKED BY:

SJK

STAINLESS, INC.219 SOUTH NINTH STREET

PERKASIE. BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

SCALE:

1"=40'FIGURE No.:

TITLE:

GROUNDWATERMONITORING WELL

LOCATION PLANNORTH

Groandwiter L*bontoi7 Analytical ResultsStainless Inc.

219 South NIB Hi StreetBorough of Ptrkasie, Backs County, Pennsylvania 18944

December 19,2000

Benzene

Bromomethane

Carbon Tetnchlofide

Chlorofoim

1,1-Dichlorodhane

1,2-Dichloroethane

1,1-Dichloroethene

cu-1,2-Dichloroethene

tram-1,2-Dichloroethene

1,2-Dichloropropane

Methylene Chloiide

1,1,2,2-TetrachloroeHiarie

Tetrachloroethene (PCS)

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

Trichloroethene (TCE)

Vinyl Chloride

Xylena (total)

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

<2.0

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

11.5

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

<2.0

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

<2.0

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

<25

ND

ND

ND

ND

4.4 J

ND

ND

<50

ND

10

27

70

100

0.74

10.000

BenzeneBromomethane

Carbon Tetrachloride

Chlorofonn

U-Dichloroothane

1,2-Dichloroethane

1,1-Dichloroethene

as-1,2-Dichloroethene

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

1 ,2-Dichloropropane

Methylene Chloride

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene (PCE)


Trichloroetfaene (TCE)

Vinyl Chloride

Xylenei (total)

NDND

NDND

ND

1.8 J

NDND

<4.0

NDND

ND

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

0.71 J

<2.0

ND

60.6

NDNDNDNDNDNDND

NDND

0.85 J

<2.0

ND

NDND

ND

ND

NDND1.4 J

5.3NDND

<2.0

NDND

NDND

<20

ND

<100

<40

1861

ND

<40

<40

ND

<20

ND

<100

<40

11.51

ND

ND

<40

ND

100

27

100

0.74

10,000

CO

IOnly Ihoee coenpovnde with detected concentretione an pnsmted.All viloei an expnaeed in units of mtcrognmi per liter (-pg/L").J indicate! an Mtimated vatae below the labomory reported detection limiti.ND deiMea IKX detected above laboratory reported detection limiti when the reported detection hnuu an leu than the PADEP mndardi.Vanw wth the < rymbol denote not detected f ND") above laboratory reported detection limits when the reported detection limiu angreater than PADEP atandarda.Shaded concentratione denote concentratione detected above PADEP grovndwater itendarde.1. PADEP Standardr. 25 PA. CODE CH. 250 (iti. Act 2 Regvlattone). Appendix A, Table 1. Medium-Specinc Concentralione

f MSCf) for Organic Regulated Snbatancee in Groundwater, need aqmfer. TDS $2,900 mg/L, reeidential valnee

LEGEND

/W-

i

i

- SHALLOW WATER-BEARING ZONE GROUNDWATER UONITORING WELL LOCATION AND NUMBER(Number In porenthealt represent* relative groundwater elevation)

- BEDROCK AQUIFER GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND NUMBER(Number In parenthesl* represents relative groundwater elevation)

- SHALLOW WATER-BEARING ZONE GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (hi feet)

= SHALLOW WATER-BEARING ZONE GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION

- BEDROCK AQUIFER GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (In feet)

- BEDROCK AQUIFER GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION

PROPERTY UNE (APPROXIMATE)

-STORY BUILDINGMENT UNDER WOOD FLOOR


SLAB ON GRADE

A R 0 0 0 3 6 2


JOB No.

2000.009DATE:

1/15/01

DRAWN BY!

ADHCHECKED BY:

RSW

STAINLESS, INC.219 SOUTH NINTH STREET

PERKASLE. BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

SCALE: FIGURE No.: 2-2TITLE:

GROUNDWATERCONTOUR MAP

(DECEMBER 19, 2000)NORTH

Table 2-1

Summary of Groundwater Level MeasurementsStainless Inc.

219 South Ninth StreetBorough of Perkasie, Bucks County, Pennsylvania 18944

December 19,2000

Wettnjf

MW-1MW-2

MW-3

MW-4

MW-5

MW-6

MW-7

MW-8

MW-9

MW-10

MW-11

I Total WettDeritnfI (^t) "£„'

9.7813.4311.34

12.13

13.05

13.27

12.96

12.58

59.99

79.98

59.59

f*"^^^"111.15107.11

99.14

99.51

98.65

97.29

99.52

97.63

102.72

97.69

97.91

Depth to Groundwater(feet)

4.836.58

2.71

2.91

4.40

3.12

2.33

2.44

5.84

3.95

7.13

Groundwater Elevation"x^a^tuM^S:

106.32100.53

96.43

96.60

94.25

94.17

97.19

95.19

96.8893.74

90.78Vertical datum for monitoring well control is approximate U.S.G.S. datum.Elevations correspond to the top of the PVC inner casing.Depth to Groundwater readings measured from top of the PVC inner casing (in feet).

2.2.2 Discussion of Results

The groundwater laboratory analytical results for the groundwater samples collected onDecember 19, 2000 are summarized in Table 2-2a and Table 2-2b. A copy of thegroundwater laboratory analytical results is included in Appendix D.

flR000363

Table 2-2a

Groundwater Laboratory Analytical ResultsStainless Inc.


December 19, 2000

'•J|| Parameter t », %>

Benzene

Bromomethane


Chloroform

1,1-Dichloroethane

1 ,2-Dichloroethane

1 , 1 -Dichloroethene

cis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene

trans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene


Methylene Chloride

1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachIoroethane


1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane


Vinyl Chloride

Xylenes (total)

&»$f£"ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

<2.0ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

L'JWfcLND

ND

ND

11.5ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

<2.0ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

" »4w-3ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

<2.0

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

RiW-4^

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

<2.0

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

MW-5

ND

<25

ND

ND

ND

<10

ND

t: 2<J5:H\.4.4 J

ND

ND

<10

i'--"'.-M:Cf%'<15

1,320

<5.0

ND

PADEP Standard1!;* "* J»v •

5

10

5

100

27

5

7

70

100

5

5

0.74

5

5

5

2

10,000

A R 0 0 0 3 6 U

Table 2-2b



December 19,2000

" :v<^i|aineter

BenzeneBromomethaneCarbon TetrachlorideChloroform1 , 1 -Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-DichloropropaneMethylene Chloride1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroethene (PCE)1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroethene (TCE)Vinyl ChlorideXylenes (total)

MW-fr

NDND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

• ":-85&.v1.8 JND

ND

<4.0

6.5<6.0

•5ijK£-.NDND

•i^7*NDND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

ND

0.71 J<2.0ND

ND

ND

ND60.6

MW-8

NDND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

7.1

NDND

0.85 J<2.0ND

ND

- 10.0NDND

;; MW%NDND

ND

ND

ND

ND

1.4 J5.3

NDND

ND

<2.0ND

ND

•:'v"l2;2S3:NDND

-MW-10

<20<100<20

ND

<100

<40

<40

18.6 JND<20

<40

<40

:- 47.3'-";:<60

E 6,550<20

ND

, MW-11

<20<100<20

ND

<100<40

<40

11.5JND

<20

ND

<40

32.4<60

X 3,920<20ND

PADEP Standard1v->:r-:v t»-.-;-:- •.-•••; . .

5105

100

27

5

7

70

1005

5

0.74

5

5

52

10,000Only those compounds with detected concentrations are presented.All values are expressed in units of micrograms per liter ("u.g/L")-J indicates an estimated value below the laboratory reported detection limits.ND denotes not detected above laboratory reported detection limits where the reported detection limits are less than the PADEP standards.Values with the < symbol denote not detected ("ND") above laboratory reported detection limits where the reported detection limits aregreater than PADEP standards.Shaded concentrations denote concentrations detected above PADEP groundwater standards.1. PADEP Standards: 25 PA. CODE CH. 250 (a.k.a., Act 2 Regulations), Appendix A, Table 1, Medium-Specific Concentrations

("MSCs") for Organic Regulated Substances in Groundwater, used aquifer, TDS <2,500 mg/L, residential values.

2.3 Specific Capacity Testing

Environmental Consulting, Inc. conducted a specific capacity test on each of the three (3)bedrock groundwater monitoring wells (i.e., MW-9, MW-10, and MW-11) on January 17, 2001.During a specific capacity test, a well is typically pumped for a few hours and the yield and themaximum drawdown are recorded. Specific capacity is defined as the yield of the well (e.g.,units of cubic feet per day) divided by the measured drawdown (e.g., units of feet) in the wellduring the test. Each well was pumped for approximately 3 hours with the exception of thegroundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-10. The groundwater monitoring well denoted asMW-10 could not sustain a yield of 1 gpm (i.e., dried-up after 30 minutes), therefore, no specificcapacity data was generated for MW-10.

The groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-9 was pumped at 2.8 gpm for 3 hours. Themaximum recorded drawdown at the end of the test was 28.92 feet. Based on this information,the specific capacity of the groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-9 was estimated at18.57 ft3/day/ft of drawdown.

10AR000365

The groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-11 was pumped at 2.8 gpm for 3 hours. Themaximum recorded drawdown at the end of the test was 31.99 feet. Based on this information,the specific capacity of the groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-11 was estimated at16.79 ft3/day/ft of drawdown.

During the specific capacity testing activities, Environmental Consulting, Inc. monitored thewater levels in the groundwater monitoring wells located in the shallow water-bearing zone.There were two objectives in monitoring the shallow water-bearing zone while pumping thebedrock aquifer. The first objective was to determine if there was a hydraulic connectionbetween the shallow water-bearing zone and the bedrock aquifer (i.e., drawdown in the shallowwater-bearing zone during pumping of the bedrock aquifer). The second objective was todetermine directional responses to the pumping if there was drawdown in the shallow water-bearing zone.

Groundwater in the Brunswick Formation occurs in interconnecting fractures that have resultedmainly from jointing. Systematic fractures, both near-vertical joints and partings along thebedding planes, are generally believed to provide principal passages for groundwater flowthrough the Brunswick Formation. Even in the conglomeratic facies at the basin margins, thefracture permeability appears to dominate the bulk of formation permeability, despite sandstonematrix porosity values of up to 20 percent.

Regionally, the dominant strike of the Brunswick Formation is to the northeast with the bedsdipping gently to the northwest. A review of geologic maps and references describing thestructure of the Brunswick Formation in the Perkasie area revealed a northeast strike with a dipof 11 degrees to the northwest. One of the well-documented features of the BrunswickFormation is the directional, anisotropic response to a pumping center. Typically, groundwatermonitoring wells aligned along strike of the formation react faster and show much greaterdrawdown than wells situated perpendicular to strike. Although the specific capacity tests werenot performed for a significant time period, such as a 48-hour aquifer test, the data collected byEnvironmental Consulting, Inc. indicates that this situation may exist on the subject property.

During the specific capacity test of the groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-9,Environmental Consulting, Inc. monitored the following groundwater monitoring wells locatedin the shallow water-bearing zone: MW-1, MW-2, MW-4 and MW-7. A decrease in the waterlevel in the groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-4 was measured after approximately25 minutes of pumping. Upon completion of the specific capacity test for the groundwatermonitoring well denoted as MW-9, the water level in the groundwater monitoring well denotedas MW-4 decreased approximately 0.25 feet. No measurable decrease was observed in the waterlevels in the groundwater monitoring wells denoted as MW-1, MW-2 and MW-7 which arelocated in the shallow water-bearing zone. Based on the investigation on the subject property,there is a hydraulic connection between the shallow water-bearing zone and the bedrock aquifer.It also appears that groundwater flow may be controlled by partings along bedding planes alongstrike based on the drawdown data collected from the groundwater monitoring well denoted asMW-4. The groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-4 is located somewhat along strikerelative to the groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-9. In contrast, the groundwatermonitoring well denoted as MW-2, which is located closer in proximity to the groundwatermonitoring well denoted as MW-9 than the groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-4 andis perpendicular to strike, did not exhibit a measurable decrease in water level.

11 A R 0 0 0 3 6 6

2.4 January 17,2001 Investigation

2.4.1 Sampling Activities

On January 17, 2001, Environmental Consulting, Inc. completed a groundwater samplingand analysis event utilizing PADEP approved procedures. Groundwater samples werecollected from the three (3) bedrock groundwater monitoring wells (i.e., MW-9, MW-10,and MW-11) located on the subject property (see Figure 2-1) at the completion of eachspecific capacity test. Prior to the specific capacity testing activities, depth togroundwater readings were obtained from the eleven (11) groundwater monitoring wellsusing an interface meter. Floating petroleum product was not encountered during thegroundwater level measurements on January 17, 2001. Groundwater levels beforeconducting the specific capacity testing activities are summarized in Table 2-3.

Table 2-3

Summary of Groundwater Level MeasurementsStainless Inc.


January 17,2001

wdiil|MW-1MW-2

MW-3MW-4

MW-5

MW-6

MW-7

MW-8

MW-9MW-10MW-11

Total W?lt]TJep«j'f&*i'fatt^nvieciJPV j.9.7813.4311.34

12.13

13.05

13.27

12.96

12.58

59.9979.9859.59

Topi of Casing Elevation""(fefet datum) -

111.15107.11

99.1499.51

98.65

97.2999.52

97.63102.7297.6997.91

Depth, to Groundwater'* f ? (ftetj «

5.59

6.78

2.88

3.01

4.21

3.90

3.02

2.81

6.07

3.74

7.54

105.56

100.33

96.26

96.50

94.44

93.39

96.50

94.82

96.65

93.95

90.37

Vertical datum for monitoring well control is approximate U.S.G.S. datum.Elevations correspond to the top of the PVC inner casing.Depth to Groundwater readings measured from top of the PVC inner casing (in feet).

Utilizing the groundwater elevation data from January 17, 2001, EnvironmentalConsulting, Inc. developed a groundwater contour map presented as Figure 2-3. Basedupon Figure 2-3, the inferred shallow water-bearing zone groundwater flow direction onJanuary 17, 2001 is generally to the east with a hydraulic gradient of 0.026 feet/foot onthe eastern portion of the subject property. Based upon Figure 2-3, the inferred bedrockaquifer groundwater flow direction on January 17, 2001 is generally to thesouth/southeast with a hydraulic gradient of 0.026 feet/foot on the subject property.

Environmental Consulting, Inc. collected groundwater samples from the three (3)bedrock groundwater monitoring wells (i.e., MW-9, MW-10, and MW-11) utilizingPADEP approved procedures. These three (3) groundwater samples were poured directlyinto pre-labeled bottles from the hose attached to the pump at the conclusion of eachspecific capacity test.

12 A R 0 0 0 3 6 7



January 17,2001

.^t#i*t**e IBenzene

Bromom ethane

Carbon Tetrachkmde

Chlorobcnzene

Chloroform

1, 1-Dichloroethane

1 ,2-Dkhloroethane

1,1-Dichloroethenc

cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene

trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene

1,2-Dichloropropane

4-Methyl-2-pentanone

Methylene Chloride

Styrene

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane



1,1,2-Trichloroethanc


Vinyl Chloride

MW-9

NDND

ND

NDND

NDND

ND3.9 J

NDND

NDND

ND<2.0

NDND

ND

2!fMsv

ND

- -wny-i«.v;<50<250

<50

<100<250

<250

<100

<100<250

<250

<50

<250

<100

<250

<100

<50<250

<150

:,'Ai%-;4$<50

-**iti

ND<25ND

NDND

ND<10

<109.0

NDND

ND

<10

ND<10

^•mm-10.8 J

<15

^•$ffi%&<5.0

:ljj^s*0j!^5105

55

10027

5

770

100

5

220

5

1000.74

5200

55

2Only those compounds with detected concentrations are presentedAll values are expressed in units of micrograms per liter ("ug/L").J indicates an estimated value below the laboratory reported detection limit.ND denotes not detected above laboratory reported detection limits where the reported detection limits are less thanthe PADEP standards.Values with the < symbol denote not detected ("ND") above laboratory reported detection limits where the reporteddetection limits are greater than PADEP standards.Shaded concentrations denote concentrations detected above PADEP groundwater standards.1. PADEP Standards: 25 PA. CODE CH. 250 (a.k a, Act 2 Regulations), Appendix A, Table 1, Medium-Specific

Concentrations ("MSCs") for Organic Regulated Substances in Groundwater, used aquifer, IDS S2.500 mg/L,residential values

£I

LEGEND~ SHALLOW WATER-BEARING ZONE GROUNDWATER UONITORING WELL LOCATION AND NUMBER

(Number In parenthesis represents relative groundwater elevation)

- BEDROCK AQUIFER GROUNDWATER UONITORING WELL LOCATION AND NUMBER(Number In porentheatt repretent* relative groundwater elevation)

- SHALLOW WATER-BEARING ZONE GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (In feet)

- SHALLOW WATER-BEARING ZONE GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION

- BEDROCK AQUIFER GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (In feet)

- BEDROCK AQUIFER GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION

PROPERTY LINE (APPROXIUATE)

MW-9(96.65)

2-STORY BUILDINGW A BASEMENT UNDER WOOD FLOOR


SLAB ON GRADE

JOB No.

2000.009DRAWN BY:

ADHSCALE:

r=4ofENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING. INC.

500 EAST WASHINGTON STREET

SUITE 375NORRISTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA 19401

CHECKED BY:

RSW

DATE:

1/18/01

A R 0 0 0 3 6 8STAINLESS, INC.

219 SOUTH NINTH STREETPERKASIE. BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

GROUNDWATERCONTOUR MAP

(JANUARY 17, 2001)NORTH

The three (3) groundwater samples were submitted to a Pennsylvania-certified laboratoryfor analysis of TCL VOCs. The three (3) groundwater samples were stored in an ice-filled cooler with an ambient temperature of 4°C until laboratory analysis

2.4.2 Discussion of Results

The groundwater laboratory analytical results for the groundwater samples collected onJanuary 17, 2001 are summarized in Table 2-4. A copy of the groundwater laboratoryanalytical results is included in Appendix E.

Table 2-4



January 17, 2001

I Parameter ' ^JlSi- '* &**r\ <&. r*f

Benzene

Bromomethane


Chlorobenzene

Chloroform

1 , 1 -Dichloroethane

1 ,2-Dichloroethane





4-Methyl-2-pentanone

Methylene Chloride

Styrene

1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane


1,1,1 -Trichloroethane



Vinyl Chloride

JMHV-9 :<•,;••.

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

3.9 J

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

<2.0

ND

ND

ND

99.5

ND

•?:•' -¥.-^-;*s.'^-,v.;-" "<••"

':''.'•'*£#£$•:••.•<50

<250

<50

<100

<250

<250

<100

<100

<250

<250

<50

<250

<100

<250

<100

<50

<250

<150

4,720

<50

MW-11 / > . - .

ND

<25

ND

ND

ND

ND

<10

<10

9.0

ND

ND

ND

<10

ND

<10

41.1

10.8 J

<15

4,590

<5.0

^^P^Dialstaiidini^"' :!"-; ..':>% stei^;.'- !"~""a'»;r-i»l

5

10

5

55

100

27

5

7

70

100

5

220

5

100

0.74

5

200

5

5

2Only those compounds with detected concentrations are presented.All values are expressed in units of micrograms per liter ("iag/L").J indicates an estimated value below the laboratory reported detection limit.ND denotes not detected above laboratory reported detection limits where the reported detection limits are less thanPADEP standards.Values with the < symbol denote not detected ("ND") above laboratory reported detection limits where the reporteddetection limits are greater than PADEP standards.Shaded concentrations denote concentrations detected above PADEP groundwater standards.1. PADEP Standards: 25 PA. CODE CH. 250 (a.k.a., Act 2 Regulations), Appendix A, Table 1, Medium-Specific

Concentrations ("MSCs") for Organic Regulated Substances in Groundwater, used aquifer, TDS <2,500 mg/L,residential values.

14A R 0 0 0 3 6 9

3.0 CONCLUSIONS

Table 3-1 through Table 3-11 document the groundwater laboratory analytical results in the eleven (11)groundwater monitoring wells (i.e., MW-1 through MW-11). Figure 3-1 depicts the locations of theeleven (11) groundwater monitoring wells on the subject property and a summary of the groundwaterlaboratory analytical results associated with each groundwater monitoring well. Based on the datacollected during these further site characterization activities, Environmental Consulting, Inc presents thefollowing conclusions:

1. Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene, PCE and TCE have been consistently detected above their respectivePADEP groundwater standards in groundwater monitoring wells MW-5 and MW-6 located in theshallow water-bearing zone on the subject property.

2. PCE was detected above the PADEP groundwater standard for PCE in groundwater monitoringwells MW-10 and MW-11 located in the bedrock aquifer.

3. TCE was detected above the PADEP groundwater standard for TCE in the groundwatermonitoring well denoted as MW-8 located in the shallow water-bearing zone and the groundwatermonitoring wells denoted as MW-9; MW-10; and MW-11, located in the bedrock aquifer.

4. The inferred shallow water-bearing zone groundwater flow direction on December 19, 2000 wasdetermined to be generally to the east/southeast with a hydraulic gradient of 0.025 feet/foot on theeastern portion of the subject property. The inferred bedrock aquifer groundwater flow direction onDecember 19, 2000 was determined to be generally to the south/southeast with a hydraulicgradient of 0.028 feet/foot on the subject property.

5. The specific capacity of the groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-9 was estimated at18.57 ft3/day/ft of drawdown.

6. The specific capacity of the groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-11 was estimated at16.79 ft3/day/ft of drawdown

7. Based on the investigation on the subject property, there is a hydraulic connection between theshallow water-bearing zone and the bedrock aquifer. It also appears that groundwater flow may becontrolled by partings along bedding planes along strike based on the drawdown data collectedfrom the groundwater monitoring well denoted as MW-4.

8. The inferred shallow water-bearing zone groundwater flow direction on January 17, 2001 wasdetermined to be generally to the east with a hydraulic gradient of 0.026 feet/foot on the easternportion of the subject property. The inferred bedrock aquifer groundwater flow direction onJanuary 17, 2001 was determined to be generally to the south/southeast with a hydraulic gradientof 0.026 feet/foot on the subject property.

15 A R 0 0 0 3 7 0

Table 3-1

MW-1Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results

Stainless Inc.219 South Ninth Street

Borough of Perkasie, Bucks County, Pennsylvania 18944

;.";.;; .;far'k^eter:.; ' \


4^112^2^00

<2.0

Dec. 19, 2000

<2.0

PADEP Standards1

0.74

Table 3-2




; • ' - - • , . > Parameter • ' • ':~'*^v- ,-.'. ' ;v-;.,;aij;.i?,uj '•'., ';-'• • -.•••%:

Chloroform


ND

<2.0

Dec.l9,26Wx

11.5

<2.0

PADEP Standards1

• .'"'.rVir'^tf -.'(. '•••- ;j'i".- - • •

100

0.74

Table 3-3




^v/:yliii^^;,-..;^1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <2.0

I)ec.l9;id0b-,->»;••>-•- * v -••••- : - :VN

<2.0

. PADEP Standards1

0.74

Table 3-4




&jjfl' Parametei%,:;;;



Trichlorofluoromethane

Nov. 22, 1991-

ND

4.1 J

ND

April 12, 2000

<2.0

ND

6.0

Dec. 19^2000

<2.0

ND

ND

PADEP Standards1

0.74

5

2,000

16A R 0 0 0 3 7 I

Table 3-5




' • ' • • ' 1"lli'ilne*er' "

1 ,2-Dichloroethane








Xylenes (total)

Nbv. 22, 1991<

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

•^..:m^M

ND

ND

; .Juntf 4, 1992

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

-îôQ*:;ND

ND

April 12, 2000,

25 *? "170

2.8

<2.0

.-. J'^,^-2.6

i;5bo- ;->5.5

5.5

Dec. 19, 2000

<10

, 205

4.4 J

<10

::''V--I*0^r.ND

• -;';:; l;32p;ND

ND

-. PADEP âjidaifts*

5

70

100

0.74

5

200

5

2,000

10,000

Table 3-6




!!:.''.3ffl&meterv •

Benzene







Nov. 22, 1991

ND

394

ND

ND

ND

ND

<\: .. isf S;;;|-.

. June 4, 1992"f ey ***• -*,

3QO

' ' - ' 110ND

ND

ND

ND

•'-"•£'?#%;•:

April 12i ibo|;

ND

46

ND

<2.0

4.4

ND

310 :;;

Dec. 19j 2000itt".-'-i \ :'•-.- '••*:-.

ND

:" :*-:85.4:; .1.8J<4.0

'•^'•'Kiffv?^•...--••••'s. -??y .-••-:<6.0

520^

PADEP Standai-ds1

5

70

100

0.74

5

5

5

17A R 0 0 0 3 7 2

Table 3-7




jOTjarneter

EthylbenzeneMethylene Chloride



Xylenes (total)

•«**«#144

ND

ND

ND

2,070

Jiine4, 1992

ND

ND

NDt'-'^A •'&.-)• ' • :".-• A,l; O.4 .

840

Aprili2y2qO§

ND

ND

<2.0

ND

480

Dec. 19, 2000

ND

0.71 J

<2.0

ND

60.6

•• PADEP^lia^^- 5«Wft «f&53safc, -«*:.:• :•• •••

700

5

0.74

5

10,000

Table 3-8




V * J|ameter

cis- 1 ,2-DichloroetheneMethylene Chloride




Nqy-tt, jUJ«*

ND

ND

ND• :#•**-; f -•:,* [•• '

5,430;;ND

June*4vl992

50

ND

ND

"4,400ND

April 12, 2000

ND

ND

<2.0

ND

6.4

'', Dec. 19} 2000

7.1

0.85 J

<2.0

mO

ND

PADE* |a i|

70

5

0.74

5

2,000

Table 3-9




- • - . ;..: . •:: •'•' - ' :*Parameter ^ v, -• •• •-.-•: '*..-•:-,-:•..•> - ,.^-jii-w.-

1 , 1 -Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene



|pic. I9i20(00

1.4 J

5.3

<2.0

122-

Jan. 17, 2Ql)l

ND

3.9 J

<2.0

99.5 ?:

PADEP Standard1

7

70

0.74

5

18A R 0 0 0 3 7 3

Table 3-10




:^:^^fcPt:BenzeneBromomethane

Carbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzene

Chloroform1,1-Dichloroethane

1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethene

cis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene

1 ,2-Dichloropropane4-Methyl-2-pentanoneMethylene ChlorideStyrene

1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroethene (PCE)


1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroethene (TCE)Vinyl Chloride

|rDlcil9!20,Q<h.•~ I*. "" "X** -t *

<20<100

<20

ND

ND

<100

<40

<40

18.6 J

ND

<20ND

<40

ND

<40

- . > 47.3

ND

<60VJ 6,550:

<20

,JanU7,fJpl'<50<250

<50

<100

<250<250

<100

<100

<250<250<50

<250<100

<250<100

<50

<250

<150

r^/:4,72$^ - :

<50

* PADEP Standard1

510

5

55

100

27

5

7

70

100

5

220

5

1000.74

5

200

5

5

2

19 AR000371*

Table 3-11




Parameter >i -> **•Benzene

Bromomethane


1,1-Dichloroethane

1 ,2-Dichloroethane




Methylene Chloride






Vinyl Chloride

Dec. 19, 2000

<20

<100

<20

<100

<40

<40

11.5 J

<20

ND

<40

32.4 " *

ND

<60

3,920

<20

Jap5li;fobl

ND

<25

ND

ND

<10

<10

9.0

ND

<10

<10

vtf.g '10.8 J

<15

,-4,5901

<5.0

PADEP Standard1

5

10

5

27

5

7

70

5

5

0.74

5

200

5

5

2Only those compounds with detected concentrations are presented.All values are expressed in units of micrograms per liter ("ng/L").J indicates an estimated value below the laboratory reported detection limits.ND denotes not detected above laboratory reported detection limits where the reported detectionlimits are less than the PADEP standards.Values with the < symbol denote not detected ("ND") above laboratory reported detection limitswhere the reported detection limits are greater than the PADEP groundwater standards.Shaded concentrations denote concentrations detected above the PADEP groundwater standards.1. PADEP Standards: 25 PA. CODE CH. 250 (a.k.a., Act 2 Regulations), Appendix A, Table 1,

Medium-Specific Concentrations ("MSCs") for Organic Regulated Substances in Groundwater,used aquifer, TDS <2,500 mg/L, residential values.

20 A R 0 0 0 3 7 5

$••••17 if Gn«4w>Hr UtonHi; Anlpkd bndti

Smui; «f CrauAtttr Uk.ri.orv Aulytkil ttnttt

CO

s1

LEGENDSHALLOW WATER-BEARING ZONE GROUNDWATERMONITORING WELL LOCATION AND NUMBER

BEDROCK AQUIFER GROUNDWATER MONITORINGWELL LOCATION AND NUMBER

2-STORY BUILDINGW/ BASEMENT UNDER WOOD FLOOR


SLAB ON GRADE

DRAWN BY:

ADHJOB No.

2000.009ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC.

500 EAST WASHINGTON STREET

SUITE 375NORRISTOWN. PENNSYLVANIA 19401

CHECKED BIT:

SJK

DATE:

3/7/01

A R 0 0 0 3 7 6STAINLESS, INC.

219 SOUTH NINTH STREETPERKASIE, BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

GROUNDWATERSUMMARY PLAN

NORTH

4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the conclusions documented in Section 3.0 of this report, Environmental Consulting, Incsuggests the following recommendations:

1. Continue quarterly groundwater sampling and analysis activities of the eight (8) shallow water-bearing zone groundwater monitoring wells (i.e., MW-1 through MW-8) and the three (3) bedrockaquifer groundwater monitoring wells (i.e., MW-9; MW-10; and MW-11).

2. Prepare and submit a remedial action plan ("RAP") to remediate the contaminant constituentconcentrations in the groundwater on the subject property pursuant to the PADEP Land RecyclingProgram (i.e., Act 2).

22 A R 0 0 0 3 7 7

APPENDIX A x

PROPERTY LOCATION MAP

A R 0 0 0 3 7 8

SUBJECT PROPERTY

Stainless, Inc.219 South Ninth Street

Perkasie, Bucks County, Pennsylvania 18944Project No. 2000.009

PROPERTYLOCATION MAP


TELFORD, PAUSGS QUADRANGLEPhotoinspected 1980

SCALE: 1 inch = 2,000 feet

APPENDIX B

BOREHOLE LOGS/MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION DETAILS

A R 0 0 0 3 8 0

Project No: 2000.009

Project: Stainless, Inc.

Client: Bucks County Redeveloment Authority

Location: Perkasie Borough, Bucks County

Monitor Wdl MW-9

Geologist: Richard S. Werner, P.O.

SUBSURFACE PROFILE

Description

iRemarks

15-

Ground Surface

Reddish-brown clayey SILT,trace fine Sand

Reddish-brown SILTSTONE,weathered

Reddish-brown SILTSTONE,hard

10" borehole to 20'bgs

6" steel casing grouted to 20' bgscasing let to set overnight 11/29/00

6" hole to 60' bgs on 11/30/00

2" PVC well constructed inside borehole

32' of screen with 28' of riser

Grayish-white SANDSTONE,fine-grained

_LDrilled By: B.L. Myers Bros., Inc.

DrOI Method: Air Rotary

Drill Date: November 29-30,2000



Sheet: 1 of 2

A R 0 0 0 3 8 I





Monitor Wdl MW-9


35-

45-

55-

SUBSURFACE PROFILE

Description

Reddish-brown SILTSTONE,alternating with reddish-brown Sandstone layers

Remarks

small fracture @ 30' bgs, makinglittle water (<lgpm)

water-bearing fracture @ 50' bgs(>3gpm)

Drilled By: B.L. Myers Bros., Inc.

Drill Method: Air Rotary




Sheet: 2 of 2

A R 0 0 0 3 8 2

T; ' V : ; ' SUBSURFACE PROFILE :

. ..

-

V-

• ,-l•"*

Description

-

• • j=5•s

. Remarks

- ; - . - . - • • : - - • _/





Monitor Well MW-10


Ground Surface


10" borehole to 20'bgs


6" hole to 80' bgs on 11/30/00




15-

Reddish-brown SILTSTONE,hard

25- dry and dusty



Drill Date: November 29-30, 2000



Sheet: 1 of 3

A R 0 0 0 3 8 3





Monitor Well MW-10

Geologist: Richard S. Werner, P.G.

SUBSURFACE PROFILE ;

Description

35-

40-

45- Reddish-brown SILTSTONE,alternating with reddish-brown Sandstone layers

55-

... Remarks

dry and dusrv

dry and dusty

dry and dusty

cuttings moist

DriOed By: B.L. Myers Bros., Inc.





Sheet: 2 of 3

A R 0 0 0 3 8 U





Monitor Well MW-10

Geologist: Richard S. Werner, P.G.

SUBSURFACE PROFILE

Description

65-

Reddish-brown SILTSTONE,alternating with reddish-brown Sandstone layers

75-

85-

90-

End of Borehole

3i

Remarks

dusty, no evidence of significant water

making little water(<lgpm)





Suite 375Norrbtown, Pennsylvania 19401

Sheet: 3 of 3

A R 0 0 0 3 8 5

^v SUBSURFACE PROFILE '

:M

§••'"I'it;

-.-•••••"- ' - / : : •"•:••'••• - l ';• "

:' : : / Description

. - . ; . . • . • • . • - • - - . •' . •• . - 'i

"1 ''

1

I

Remarks

, - ' • - . .•••-',- V ..-.' - . - - . - ' - . - : • • • : : - • - • - '-^4V"





Monitor Well MW-11

Ground Surface



15-

Reddbh-brown SILTSTONE,hard

25-

Geotogist: Richard S. Werner, P.O.

10" borehole to 20' bgs


6" hole to 60' bgs on 11/30/00



dry and dusty

dry and dusty



Drffl Date: November 29-30,2000



Sheet: 1 of 2

A R 0 0 0 3 8 6





Monitor WeU MW-11

Geologist: Richard S Werner, P.G.

SUBSURFACE PROFILE -

Description

45- Reddish-brown SILTSTONE,alternating with reddish-brown Sandstone layers

55-

Remarks

dry and dusty

dry and dusty

water-bearing fracture @ 53' bgs(>3gpm)






Sheet: 2 of 2

A R 0 0 0 3 8 7

APPENDIX C

DECEMBER 19, 2000GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOGS

A R 0 0 0 3 8 8


Telephone: (610) 279-7070 Facsimile: (610)279-4334

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG

PROJECT NO. 2fjC& • CO t DATE

PROJECT NAME

PROJECT LOCATION ?AWELL NO. /V\\\' ~~

CASING DIAMETER (inches)

TOTAL WELL DEPTH (feet) C\ . 73

DEPTH TO WATER (before purging) *T . ^ DEPTH TO PRODUCT

(2-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.1632)(4-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.6528)(6-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 1.4689)

WELL VOLUME (gallons)

VOLUME TO BE PURGED (well volume *3) - VOLUME PURGED (gallons)

BEFORE PURGING

Temp.

MONITORING DATA

Temp.

pH

DEPTH TO WATER (before sampling) ^ ^ i"')

SAMPLING TIME 2 : 33

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS T£.i-, \CC.S

AFTER PURGING

NOTES: :M

A R 0 0 0 3 8 9


Telephone: (SiO) 279-7070 Facsimile: (610) 279-4334


PROJECT NO. 2&LO-CG°\ DATE 42-

PROJECT NAME

PROJECT LOCATION

WELL NO. M\\' ~~


TOTAL WELL DEPTH (feet) _

DEPTH TO WATER (before purging) U DEPTH TO PRODUCT



VOLUME TO BE PURGED (well volume *3) VOLUME PURGED (gal lons)

Temp.

pH

BEFORE PURGING

- '1, t

MONITORING DATA

Temp.

pH

DEPTH TO WATER (before sampling) 6

SAMPLING TIME 2 ^6"

TT^v—ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS

NOTES:

AFTER PURGING

= jr.

A R 0 0 0 3 9 0


Telephone: (610) 279-7070 Facs.rr.iie: (510) 279-4334


PROJECT NO. _ ynC_U • UU f DATE

PROJECT NAME

PROJECT LOCATION \^(l\<. S v i

WELL NO. AA\\' ~~ 3)

CASING DIAMETER (inches) ~

TOTAL WELL DEPTH (feet) I \ .

DEPTH TO WATER (before purging) /,-T! DEPTH TO PRODUCT N/A

(2-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.1632)(0-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.6528) J.('6-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 1.4689)


VOLUME TO BE PURGED (well volume *3) __^__ VOLUME PURGED (gallons)

MONITORING DATABEFORE PURGING AFTER PURGING

Temp. = -"? <T~ Temp. = " " ? . " >

pH = ' ••? -7 pH it LsO

DEPTH TO WATER (before sampling) 2 . ~7 J>

SAMPLING TIME ~ • 53

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS TT,v_ '

NOTES: fl.-;^ (' 7 Q^JU-j • J

A R 0 0 0 3 9 I


Telephone: (610) 279-7070 Facs.rriie. (610) 279-4334


~ x- /--, O

PROJECT NO. 2DC& • ^ ' DATE -I :

PROJECT NAMEi ,

PROJECT LOCATION

WELL NO. AA\N/ "

CASING DIAMETER (inches) ^

TOTAL WELL DEPTH (feet) \ 2 . >3

DEPTH TO WATER (before purging) 'j-'-\\ DEPTH TO PRODUCT MA(1-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.1632) ,

v(4-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.6528) Ll *- **(6-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 1.4689)


VOLUME TO BE PURGED (well volume *3) / ?' t?6 VOLUME PURGED (gallons) /


Temp. = i I • •'', Temp. = %.

PH = / --/y PH = 6: is*,DEPTH TO WATER (before sampling) 2. 6? 2.

SAMPLING TIME ^ ^ J

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS TT.\—.

NOTES: P. , A* A_4r_ \ 2.

A R 0 0 0 3 9 2


Telephone: (610) 279-7070 Facs f<\a- .'510) 279-4334


PROJECT NO. 2&C& • £-<-- ' DATE

PROJECT NAME T ;K \ rvj IN3C-

PROJECT LOCATION \^:&\C kS v C ?A

WELL NO. /V\\\j ~~ ^S"

CASING DIAMETER (inches) ^

TOTAL WELL DEPTH (feet) \ 3. O-S"

DEPTH TO WATER (before purging) >-: ~" DEPTH TO PRODUCT Ni) A

(2-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.1632)(4-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.6528) J •</>(6-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 1.4689)


VOLUME TO BE PURGED (well volume *3) Id;, VOLUME PURGED (gallons)


Temp. = "/. 2 Temp. = ~* • <•

pH = / f ^ pH 1. - f

DEPTH TO WATER (before sampling) I ( °

SAMPLING TIME ^ •^'

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS TC.\-.

NOTES: £--v~ Jr-i

A R 0 0 0 3 9 3


Telephone: (6iO) 279-7070 .=acs,rr.iie. (510) 279-4334


PROJECT NO. DATE

PROJECT NAME

PROJECT LOCATION ?A

WELL NO. AA\\J -~~


TOTAL WELL DEPTH (feet)

DEPTH TO WATER (before purging) DEPTH TO PRODUCT



VOLUME TO BE PURGED (well volume *3) 'j %$ VOLUME PURGED (gallons)

BEFORE PURGING

Temp. = / «£_

pH - (V -It

DEPTH TO WATER (before sampling)

SAMPLING TIME ^ • 5^

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS TC

MONITORING DATA

Temp.

pH

NOTES:

AFTER PLTIGING

• ? 4-

A R 0 0 0 3 9 t *


Telephone: (610) 279-7070 Facs.miie: (510) 27S-4334


PROJECT NO.

PROJECT NAME

• CC t DATE

\ No \ NS <T_

PROJECT LOCATION

WELL NO. AAVW^ 7

v £.


TOTAL WELL DEPTH (feet) \ 2. 7 tp

DEPTH TO WATER (before purging) ^.^ DEPTH TO PRODUCT

(2-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.1632)'(4-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.6528) <C(6-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 1.4689)


VOLUME TO BE PURGED (well volume *3) 2Q i'l- VOLUME PURGED (gallons)

MONITORING DATABEFORE PURGING

Temp.


SAMPLING TIME ^ 2-

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS T"r.\

NOTES:

AFTER PURGING

Temp. = 7, Z_

PH = / A- I

A R 0 0 0 3 9 5


Telephone: (610) 279-7070 Facs.mle: (510) 279-4334


PROJECT NO. DATE '/ 2 \

PROJECT NAME NJ

PROJECT LOCATION

WELL NO. A'\\N/ ~

i £. ?A


TOTAL WELL DEPTH (feet) \ *2

DEPTH TO WATER (before purging) DEPTH TO PRODUCT N/A(2-inch diameter— multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.1632)(4-inch diameter— multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.6528)(6-inch diameter— multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 1.4689)


VOLUME TO BE PURGED (well volume *3) VOLUME PURGED (gallons) ; £

BEFORE PURGING

Temp. = J; 'i,C

MONITORING DATA

Temp.

pH


SAMPLING TIME ^ ' -^

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS "TC

AFTER PURGING

NOTES:

R R 0 0 0 3 9 6

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC.500 EAST WASHINGTON STREETSUITE 37 5NORRISTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA 19401

Telephone: (610) 279-7070 Facsimile: (510) 279-4334


PROJECT NO. DATE ;l Z-;l ' Z-/J

P RO JECT NAME i\ \ K) < I N3 C^ .

PROJECT LOCATION

WELL NO. AA\\' "

CASING DIAMETER (inches) .'-

TOTAL WELL DEPTH (feet) S 1 11


(2-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.1632) 5If- '">'(4-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.6528)(6-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DT\V by 1.4689)


VOLUME TO BE PURGED (well volume *3) 2-6. "f 2. VOLUME PURGED (gallons)

MONITORING DATABEFORE PURGING

Temp.

pH • /-37DEPTH TO WATER (before sampling) .> A

SAMPLING TIME ^ " C '

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS TCi— \OC«

NOTES:

TemP-

pH

AFTER PURGING

V V. v „ Cl\ Vt,. f' I A k v v , i \ ' j iA'.A \A L.-\ V U A Ajf •/

1

A R 0 0 0 3 9 7

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC..500 EAST WASHINGTON STREETSUITE 375NORRISTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA 19401

Telephone: (610) 279-7070 facsimile: (510) 279-4334


PROJECT NO. 2£>C£> -&C°\ _ DATE 4 ZJ\ '

PROJECT NAME <5'T Ao NJ i-^=6> { N3 f- .

PROJECT LOCATION Y

WELL NO. /VNN^ \O



DEPTH TO WATER (before purging) -• v > DEPTH TO PRODUCT M/A

(2-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.1632) 'Id. c>(4-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.6528)(6-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 1.4689)

WELL VOLUME (gallons) /"2

VOLUME TO BE PURGED (well volume *3) " - VOLUME PURGED (gallons)


Temp. = 75": (^- Temp. = / C

pH = ^ ^ , pH = 7. 5

DEPTH TO WATER (before sampling) I Cf , 3

SAMPLING TIME 3 ^ 7

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS Tr.\_ V j .-S

NOTES: K

A R 0 0 0 3 9 8

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC.500 EAST WASHINGTON STREETSUITE 37 5NORRISTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA 19401

Telephone: (610) 279-7070


: ;6iO) 279-4334

PROJECT NO. - CO DATE J

PROJECT NAME K \

PROJECT LOCATION \i

WELL NO. A/V\\; " \ \



C ?A


v13-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.1632) 52(4-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 0.6528)(6-inch diameter—multiply difference of TWD-DTW by 1.4689)


VOLUME TO BE PURGED (well volume *3) VOLUME PURGED (gallons)

Temp.

pH

BEFORE PURGING

= (f>,

MONITORING DATA

Temp.

pH

DEPTH TO WATER (before sampling) _

SAMPLING TIME ~> 4i

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS TCi-

AFTER PURGING

NOTES:

QV// 4-

7,17

A R 0 0 0 3 9 9

APPENDIX D

GROUNDWATER LABORATORYANALYTICAL RESULTS

(DECEMBER: 19, 2000)

A R O O O l t O O

ACCLJTE5T 01/05/01

Technical Report for

Environmental Consulting, Inc.

Perkasie, PA

2000.009

Accutest Job Number: E82965

Report to:

Environmental Consulting, Inc.500 East Washington StreetSuite 375Norristown, PA 19401

ATTN: Samuel Kucia

Total number of pages in report: 24

Vinc:n\ J. PugliesePres

Certifications: NJ(1212<». NY(L0983>. CA. CT. DE. FL. KS. MA. MD. NC. PA. RI. SC. VA

Results relate only 10 the items tested.

This report shall not he reproduced, except in its entirety, without the wri t ten approval of Acculest Laboratories.

A R O O O i t O I

In -.-\ • Fti'sh Po"'1s ;>rm:ntR ViK-'/in • Builiiintj 3 • 2235 Route 130 • Da-.ton NJ 08810 • tel. T32 329 0200 • lav 732 329 3-199 - h|tp VA-.-.V ic::u!esl com

Sample Summary


Perkasie, PAProject No: 2000.009

Job No: E82965

Sample Collected MatrixNumber Date Time By Received Code Type

ClientSample ED

E82965-1 12/19/00 14:38 ADH 12/20/00 AQ Ground Water MW1











A R O O O U 0 2

Report of Analysis Page 1 of 2

Client Sample ID: MW1Lab Sample ID: E82965-1Matrix: AQ - Ground WaterMethod: SW846 8260BProject: Perkasie, PA

File ID DF Analyzed ByRun#l D37684.D 1 12/27/00 NMRun #2

Date Sampled: 12/19/00Date Received: 12/20/00Percent Solids: n/a

Prep Date Prep Batchn/a n/a

f

Analytical BatchVD1680

VGA TCL List

CAS No. Compound Result RL Units Q

67-64-171-43-275-27-475-25-274-83-978-93-375-15-056-23-5108-90-775-00-367-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-275-35-4156-59-2156-60-578-87-510061-01-510061-02-6100-41-4591-78-6108-10-175-09-2100-42-579-34-5127-18-4108-88-371-55-679-00-579-01-675-01-41330-20-7

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneDibromochloromethane1 , 1 -Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene2-Hexanone4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1 -Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl chlorideXylene (total)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

5.01.01.04.05.05.05.01.02.05.05.05.05.05.02.02.05.05.01.01.01.01.05.05.02.05.02.01.01.05.03.01.01.05.0

ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1

ND = Not detectedRL = Reporting LimitE = Indicates value exceeds calibration range

J = Indicates an estimated valueB = Indicates analyte found in associated method blankN = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound

A R O O O t * 0 3


Client Sample ID: MW1Lab Sample ID:Matrix:Method:Project:

E82965-1AQ - Ground WaterSW846 8260BPerkasie, PA


VGA TCL List

CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries

1868-53-717060-07-02037-26-5460-00-4

Dibromofluoromethane1,2-Dichloroethane-D4Toluene-D84-Bromofluorobenzene

Run# 1 Run# 2 Limits

106% 81-122%110% 69-122%103% 87-116%102% 81-125%





File ED DF Analyzed ByRun#l D37685.D 1 12/27/00 NMRun #2



'


VOA TCL List


67-64-171-43-275-27-475-25-274-83-978-93-375-15-056-23-5108-90-775-00-367-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-275-35-4156-59-2156-60-578-87-510061-01-510061-02-6100-41-4591-78-6108-10-175-09-2100-42-579-34-5127-18-4108-88-371-55-679-00-579-01-675-01-41330-20-7

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneDibromochloromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropenetrans-1 ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene2-Hexanone4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1, 1-Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl chlorideXylene (total)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND11.5NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

5.01.01.04.05.05.05.01.02.05.05.05.05.05.02.02.05.05.01.01.01.01.05.05.02.05.02.01.01.05.03.01.01.05.0

ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/Iug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1



A R O O O U 0 5


Client Sample ED: MW2Lab Sample ID:Matrix:Method:Project:



VOA TCL List


1868-53-717060-07-02037-26-5460-00-4



108% 81-122%112% 69-122%103% 87-116%105% 81-125%



A R O O O U 0 6

Report of Analysis Pagel of 2





'


VOA TCL List


67-64-171-43-275-27-475-25-274-83-978-93-375-15-056-23-5108-90-775-00-367-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-275-35-4156-59-2156-60-578-87-510061-01-510061-02-6100-41-4591-78-6108-10-175-09-2100-42-579-34-5127-18-4108-88-371-55-679-00-579-01-675-01-41330-20-7

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneD ibromochloromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-l,3-Dichloropropenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene2-Hexanone4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1 -Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl chlorideXylene (total)


5.01.01.04.05.05.05.01.02.05.05.05.05.05.02.02.05.05.01.01.01.01.05.05.02.05.02.01.01.05.03.01.01.05.0

ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/Iug/1ug/1



A R O O O U 0 7


Client Sample ED: MW3Lab Sample ID:Matrix:Method:Project:



VGA TCL List


1868-53-717060-07-02037-26-5460-00-4

Dibromofluoromethane1,2-Dichloroethane-D4Toluene-084-Bromofluorobenzene


110% 81-122%115% 69-122%103% 87-116%102% 81-125%



A R O O O U 0 8



File ID DF Analyzed ByRun#l D37687.D 1 12/27/00 NMRun n



'


VGA TCL List


67-64-171-43-275-27-475-25-274-83-978-93-375-15-056-23-5108-90-775-00-367-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-275-35-4156-59-2156-60-578-87-510061-01-510061-02-6100-41-4591-78-6108-10-175-09-2100-42-579-34-5127-18-4108-88-371-55-679-00-579-01-675-01-41330-20-7

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneDibromochloromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis-1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-l,3-Dichloropropenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneEmylbenzene2-Hexanone4-MethyI-2-pentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl chlorideXylene (total)


5.01.01.04.05.05.05.01.02.05.05.05.05.05.02.02.05.05.01.01.01.01.05.05.02.05.02.01.01.05.03.01.01.05.0




A R O O C H 0 9





VGA TCL List


1868-53-717060-07-02037-26-5460-00-4

Dibromofluoromethane1,2-Dichloroethane-D4Toluene-DS4-Bromofluorobenzene


109% 81-122%108% 69-122%102% 87-116%108% 81-125%



A R O O O U O


Client Sample ID: MW5Lab Sample ED: E82965-5Matrix: AQ - Ground WaterMethod: SW846 8260BProject: Perkasie, PA

File ED DF Analyzed ByRuntfl D37688.D 5 12/27/00 NMRun #2



*


VGA TCL List


67-64-171-43-275-27-475-25-274-83-978-93-375-15-056-23-5108-90-775-00-367-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-275-35-4156-59-2156-60-578-87-510061-01-510061-02-6100-41-4591-78-6108-10-175-09-2100-42-579-34-5127-18-4108-88-371-55-679-00-579-01-675-01-41330-20-7

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneDibromochloromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-l,3-Dichloropropenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene2-Hexanone4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1 -Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl chlorideXylene (total)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND2054.4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND14.0NDNDND1320NDND

255.05.0202525255.0102525252525101025255.05.05.05.025251025105.05.025155.05.025

ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1 Jug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1



A R O O O M I





VGA TCL List


1868-53-717060-07-02037-26-5460-00-4


Run# 1 Runl 2 Limits

107% 81-122%107% 69-122%103% 87-116%105% 81-125%



A R O O O U 2


Client Sample ED:Lab Sample ID:Matrix:Method:Project:

File IDRun#l D37689Run #2

MW6E82965-6AQ - Ground WaterSW846 8260BPerkasie, PA

DF Analyzed ByD 2 12/27/00 NM



t


VGA TCL List


67-64-171-43-275-27-475-25-274-83-978-93-375-15-056-23-5108-90-775-00-367-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-275-35-4156-59-2156-60-578-87-510061-01-510061-02-6100-41-4591-78-6108-10-175-09-2100-42-579-34-5127-18-4108-88-371-55-679-00-579-01-675-01-41330-20-7

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneDibromochloromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene2-Hexanone4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1.1, 1-Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl chlorideXylene (total)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND85.41.8NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND6.5NDNDND520NDND

102.02.08.01010102.04.010101010104.04.010102.02.02.02.010104.0104.02.02.0106.02.02.010

ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1 Jug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1



A R O O O U 3


Client Sample ID: MW6Lab Sample ED:Matrix:Method:Project:



VGA TCL List


1868-53-717060-07-02037-26-5460-00-4



108% 81-122%111% 69-122%104% 87-116%106% 81-125%



A R O O O M U




Date SampledDate ReceivedPercent Solids

Prep Daten/a

: 12/19/00: 12/20/00: n/a

'

Prep Batch Analytical Batchn/a VD1680

VGA TCL List


67-64-171-43-275-27-475-25-274-83-978-93-375-15-056-23-5108-90-775-00-367-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-275-35-4156-59-2156-60-578-87-510061-01-510061-02-6100-41-4591-78-6108-10-175-09-2100-42-579-34-5127-18-4108-88-371-55-679-00-579-01-675-01-41330-20-7

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneDibromochloromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene2-Hexanone4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1 -Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl chlorideXylene (total)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.71NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND60.6

5.01.01.04.05.05.05.01.02.05.05.05.05.05.02.02.05.05.01.01.01.01.05.05.02.05.02.01.01.05.03.01.01.05.0

ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1 Jug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1



A R O O O M 5





VGA TCL List


1868-53-717060-07-02037-26-5460-00-4



106% 81-122%112% 69-122%103% 87-116%107% 81-125%



A R O O O M 6


Client Sample ID: MW8Lab Sample ED: E82965-8Matrix: AQ - Ground WaterMethod: SW846 8260BProject: Perkasie, PA

File ED DF Analyzed ByRun#l D37691.D 1 12/27/00 NMRun #2



Y


VGA TCL List


67-64-171-43-275-27-475-25-274-83-978-93-375-15-056-23-5108-90-775-00-367-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-275-35-4156-59-2156-60-578-87-510061-01-510061-02-6100-41-4591-78-6108-10-175-09-2100-42-579-34-5127-18-4108-88-371-55-679-00-579-01-675-01-41330-20-7

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroe thaneChloroformChloromethaneDibromochloromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene2-Hexanone4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1 -Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl chlorideXylene (total)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND7.1NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.85NDNDNDNDNDND10.0NDND

5.01.01.04.05.05.05.01.02.05.05.05.05.05.02.02.05.05.01.01.01.01.05.05.02.05.02.01.01.05.03.01.01.05.0

ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1 Jug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1



A R O O O M 7





VGA TCL List


1868-53-717060-07-02037-26-5460-00-4


Run# 1 Run* 2 Limits

109% 81-122%110% 69-122%103% 87-116%106% 81-125%



A R O O O U 8


Client Sample ED: MW9Lab Sample ID: E82965-9Matrix: AQ - Ground WaterMethod: SW846 8260BProject: Perkasie, PA




'


VGA TCL List


67-64-171-43-275-27-475-25-274-83-978-93-375-15-056-23-5108-90-775-00-367-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-275-35-4156-59-2156-60-578-87-510061-01-510061-02-6100-41-4591-78-6108-10-175-09-2100-42-579-34-5127-18-4108-88-371-55-679-00-579-01-675-01-41330-20-7

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneDibromochloromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-l,3-Dichloropropenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene2-Hexanone4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1 -Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl chlorideXylene (total)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.45.3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND122NDND

5.01.01.04.05.05.05.01.02.05.05.05.05.05.02.02.05.05.01.01.01.01.05.05.02.05.02.01.01.05.03.01.01.05.0

ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1 Jug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1



A R O O O M 9





VGA TCL List


1868-53-717060-07-02037-26-5460-00-4



106% 81-122%110% 69-122%102% 87-116%105% 81-125%



A R O O O l * 2 0






'


VGA TCL List


67-64-171-43-275-27-475-25-274-83-978-93-375-15-056-23-5108-90-775-00-367-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-275-35-4156-59-2156-60-578-87-510061-01-510061-02-6100-41-4591-78-6108-10-175-09-2100-42-579-34-5127-18-4108-88-371-55-679-00-579-01-675-01-41330-20-7

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneDibromochloromethane1 , 1 -Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene2-Hexanone4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1 -Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl chlorideXylene (total)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND18.6NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND47.3NDNDND6550NDND

100202080100100100204010010010010010040401001002020202010010040100402020100602020100

ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1 Jug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1



A R O O C H 2 I


Client Sample ID: MW10Lab Sample ED:Matrix:Method:Project:



VGA TCL List

CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries Run# 1 Run# 2 Limits

1868-53-717060-07-02037-26-5460-00-4


107%109%107%104%

81-122%69-122%87-116%81-125%



A R O O I H 2 2


Client Sample ED: MW11Lab Sample ID: E82965- 1 1Matrix: AQ - Ground WaterMethod: SW846 8260BProject: Perkasie, PA

File ID DF Analyzed ByRun#l D37697.D 20 12/27/00 NMRun n



-


VGA TCL List


67-64-171-43-275-27-475-25-274-83-978-93-375-15-056-23-5108-90-775-00-367-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-275-35-4156-59-2156-60-578-87-510061-01-510061-02-6100-41-4591-78-6108-10-175-09-2100-42-579-34-5127-18-4108-88-371-55-679-00-579-01-675-01-41330-20-7

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneDibromochloromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropenetrans-1 ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene2-Hexanone4-Methy 1 -2-pentanone(M IBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl chlorideXylene (total)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND11.5NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND32.4NDNDND3920NDND

100202080100100100204010010010010010040401001002020202010010040100402020100602020100




A R O O O U 2 3





VGA TCL List

CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries Run# 1 Run# 2 Limits

1868-53-717060-07-02037-26-5460-00-4

Dibromofluoromethane1,2-Dichloroethane-D4Toluene-084-Bromofluorobenzene

106%105%104%109%

81-122%69-122%87-116%81-125%



AROOCH2I*

\

.— /

~% -

im9

u>Ull-0o<

*HMK

3*3*<^s" -J

/5;vzr-»=jD^Ûj

id£zr£DO^^ 0

CO

Sf^ to

^^13E

4•

(iur••

3<IB

*UJ

O

8MUl

Oo<

c>

si§ ii; °55 S< pp

^ Csjo &£- /v1

>- ^^ <Q V|g

35 R

OU

TE

2-3

29-0

200

«i ;TC\) N.

e•

1J

t

9

| M

AT

RIX

CO

DE

S

5acg_j<O

h<7<

—

ZU

UZccu.

Io<u.

RM

AT

ION

SZ

UlIjO

OW

- D

F.-M

KIN

GIA

/LT

PC

3

v;— ~ -

;^

i<i^^^2-5

iP

4\jfj$\r

\«u.•-1r»

1

. 0

•cu

^^c, -•

10•S<-.>

u111occa.

U

n

I2^~\P

*Lj

I'v

i s

<

-^^cc,

^zo5oo

_^

' C

*2

viI*-

\fi

rC/

c A

li

1U

i in O

O

OUl

Ea

a.N

3

^

^

(V

U

a el_i </>

- !-

rT>

r°

T~~

O

*Xu.

SJp^

1

S^

Q..O0

SEN

D R

EPO

RP

HO

NE

*

s

~V2zp a

1"ft

c

8* ho.

sailJO

XldJ

it

i

LLE

CT

ION

OU

i

\

(

i<ti

I

tt

I

AC

CU

TE

S-

OUJin

CD

i *

NON

OSZH

ONH

O«N

OH

inn»

iVW

3u

iJir0

UJSt-

UJ

0

z

uJJ

JL

iL

2ajL

JJ_l3L

<J)

'&^^.

Qj

y

Xt^r\ ' /~?

*r^f

N

Cj*• •.

- • ^

1

^

I

t

:xJ

^<

y

\2

\

X

H

r,

N

Kî

^

'

IX

%~y^

0

û.T

-^-3-

i

^VC

tc

•

^

D

X

'I

z

»><3»$<

QQJ U

X

?<

W-

r-i

1-<

r\\U*fl

^^

^0.

^ -,(yj

§

v-

S *

-•><

0

/*—W

k•*£.

„__

f

V

+•

•***

r

**

0

i^

•

.:?<^^

^

f

•^

i.i

(A:cc<Ula:?zUl

Oo

p<2CCuu.z

_lm<Ul

_iUlQ

Q

^^

O

D IN

FO

RM

A1

z-)occ

A T

UR

NA

5

S 3

< a

-J -< <

O"™ P

cc aUl U,2 sS 2OCoc^,

aUl0

Ul ;DC U.

5^

G C

molu

AP

PR

OV

IA

ND

AR

CS

H

S5g««

IIS?X:

i1 WC 2i cc•81 "•' II

iS>p1 Ul

: -

a.o

• _l• _gC

>.

ER

GE

NC

gCO

5Qr>-

C

I

ua<aif

uciur

u3

C

C

'

J 1

(SP

EC

IFY

j tt«I2?

]n

Xifa

atco

yusu

u>-a.

8

UN

D H

AR

E

o1. z

! f> 1J «

aUl>

ff

S

EV

IOU

SLY

(Co.(OCA

DA

TA U

NLE

>DCUl

UJaccUl

c3OOo

o

2<A

U)

O

UlO

<

enUl

a.

-15<nUl2

Xofi

D B

ELO

W

Ul

Ul

Uon

MU

ST

BE

o

£uUl

a.

\rj

V?\^MV.

010

>

uDC CM

d

( V

T> ^

I SQ r

•> ,

1~T>

> iiiO ^

Ul X

®~~d

U .

r

'•* (**. .

i.

V - "l

REC

EIVE

D B

i-;'\

L

?,

S47

> âv^

tc

>

ao>Su(C ^

UJ

<O

J

>m

s-42o

L

»

REC

EIVE

D 6

3.

ui

I^

•\>a

ilih<

u U

1

Ul'-av,§

Ul

3

*.i-2 \oer\WLJ5Ul>52CL

i

>

REC

EIVE

D B

DAT

E TI

ME:

>

a

1RE

LIN

QU

ISH

E

5.

,_.•<C^

APPENDIX E

GROUNDWATER LABORATORYANALYTICAL RESULTS

(JANUARY 17, 2001)

ftROOOl*26

02/02/01

Technical Report for


Perkasie, PA

98029

Accutest Job Number: E84494

Report to:

Environmental Consulting, Inc.500 East Washington StreetSuite 375Norristown, PA 19401

ATTN: Samuel Kucia

Total number of pages in report: 75

Vincent J'. PugliesePresident

Certifications: NJ(12129), NY(10983). CA. CT, DE. FL. KS, MA, MD, NC, PA. Rl, SC, VA

Results relate only to the items tested.

This report shall noi be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Accutesl Laboratories.

N.-w .|..r«-y • Fresh Ponds Corporate Village • Building B • 2235 Route 130 - Dayton, NJ 08810 • tel: 732 329 0200 • fax: 732 329 3499 <

Sample Summary


Perkasie, PAProject No: 98029

Job No: E84494

Sample Collected MatrixNumber Date Time By Received Code Type

ClientSample ID

E84494-1 01/17/01 11:50 ADH 01/18/01 AQ Ground Water MW-9



N,-» J.TSI-V • Fresh Ponds Corporate Village • Building B • 2235 Route 130 • Dayton, NJ 08810 • lei: 732 329 0200 • lax: 732 329 3499- hnpMwWacKitesuorn


Client Sample ID:Lab Sample ID:Matrix:Method:Project:

File IDRun#l SI 5633Run #2

MW-9E84494-1AQ - Ground WaterSW846 8260BPerkasie, PA

DF Analyzed ByD 1 01/25/01 YL



Analytical BatchVS522

VGA TCL List


67-64-171-43-275-27-475-25-274-83-978-93-375-15-056-23-5108-90-775-00-367-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-275-35-4156-59-2156-60-578-87-510061-01-510061-02-6100-41-4591-78-6108-10-175-09-2100-42-579-34-5127-18-4108-88-371-55-679-00-579-01-675-01-41330-20-7

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneDibromochloromethane1 , 1 -Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1 , 1-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene2-Hexanone4- Methy l-2-pentanone(M IBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1 -Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl chlorideXylene (total)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.9NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND99.5NDND

5.01.01.04.05.05.05.01.02.05.05.05.05.05.02.02.05.05.01.01.01.01.05.05.02.05.02.01.01.05.03.01.01.05.0


o-y 3ND = Not detectedRL = Reporting LimitE = Indicates value exceeds calibration range


A R O O O l * 2 9


Client Sample ID: MW-9Lab Sample ID:Matrix:Method:Project:



VGA TCL List


1868-53-717060-07-02037-26-5460-00-4


Run#l

96%91%

Run# 2 Limits

81-118%68-124%85-119%75-127%

0 "'ND = Not detectedRL = Reporting LimitE = Indicates value exceeds calibration range


A R O O O U S O


Client Sample ID:Lab Sample ID:Matrix:Method:Project:

File IDRun #1 U5037.Run #2

MW-10E84494-2AQ - Ground WaterSW846 8260BPerkasie, PA

DF Analyzed ByD 50 01/26/01 KNV



Analytical BatchVU160

VGA TCL List


67-64-171-43-275-27-475-25-274-83-978-93-375-15-056-23-5108-90-775-00-367-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-275-35-4156-59-2156-60-578-87-510061-01-510061-02-6100-41-4591-78-6108-10-175-09-2100-42-579-34-5127-18-4108-88-371-55-679-00-579-01-675-01-41330-20-7

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneDibromochloromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene2-Hexanone4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl chlorideXylene (total)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND4720NDND

2505050200250250250501002502502502502501001002502505050505025025010025010050502501505050250



J = Indicates an estimated valueB = Indicates analyte found in associated method blankN = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound/idence ot a compound

H R O O O I 4 3 I





VGA TCL List


1868-53-717060-07-02037-26-5460-00-4

Dibromofluoromethane1,2-Dichloroethane-D4Toluene-DS4- Bromo fluorobenzene

Run# 1 Runff 2 Limits

101% 81-118%101% 68-124%97% 85-119%96% 75-127%

OND = Not detectedRL = Reporting LimitE = Indicates value exceeds calibration range


A R O O O U 3 2


Client Sample ID: MW-11Lab Sample ID: E84494-3Matrix: AQ - Ground WaterMethod: SW846 8260BProject: Perkasie, PA

File ID DFRun#l U5038.D 5Run if 2 U5042.D 50

Analyzed01/26/0101/26/01

ByKNVKNV


Prep Date Prep Batchn/a n/an/a n/a

Analytical BatchVU160VU160

VGA TCL List


67-64-171-43-275-27-475-25-274-83-978-93-375-15-056-23-5108-90-775-00-367-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-275-35-4156-59-2156-60-578-87-510061-01-510061-02-6100-41-4591-78-6108-10-175-09-2100-42-579-34-5127-18-4108-88-371-55-679-00-579-01-675-01-41330-20-7

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneDibromochloromethane1 , 1-Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1 , 1 -Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropenetrans-1 ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene2-Hexanone4- Methyl-2-pentanone(M IBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1 -Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl chlorideXylene (total)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND9.0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND41.1ND10.8ND4590 a

NDND

255.05.0202525255.0102525252525101025255.05.05.05.025251025105.05.02515505.025

ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1 Jug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1

IV' 7ND = Not detectedRL = Reporting LimitE = Indicates value exceeds calibration range


A R O O O I 4 3 3





VGA TCL List


1868-53-717060-07-02037-26-5

Dibromofluoromethane1,2-Dichloroethane-D4Toluene-DS

Run#l

100%102%

Run# 2 Limits

100%100%96%

460-00-4 4-Bromofluorobenzene

(a) Result is from Run# 2

94%

81-118%68-124%85-119%75-127%



A R O O O U 3 1 *

AC

CU

TES

T J

OB

»:

fim<\

Hya

iLj

(r^

in/\irN

vjr ^u

aiv

ji^i

•Tl /\

ff

' »f

»l

IH

EIC

S"

F

RE

SH

PO

ND

S C

OR

PO

RA

TE

VIL

LAG

E.

BU

ILD

ING B

AC

CU

TES

T Q

UO

TE •

:£g£

*' **

Bl

•*•'*

*

•""T

nrI '•

2235

RO

UT

E 1

30,

DA

YT

ON

, N

J 0

8810

. 732-3

29-0

200

FA

X:

732-

329-

3499

/348

0

| M

AT

RIX

CO

DE

AN

ALY

TIC

AL

INFO

RM

ATIO

NF

AC

ILIT

Y IN

FO

RM

AT

ION

| C

LIE

NT

IN

FO

RM

ATIO

N

S o c z o c i u c c o cote/-,* m 3 uj t- m Q S ^ S Q

5 * ? o.j-2 oo u f tn a> o -t u>

OUlU)

m_i

^~3OA T3J-

jV-

j* ••

0

6

\l

Ci

0-V

v

PR

OJE

CT

NA

k

c/

^

z

" (JJ

a

LOC

AT

ION

|

<=>

\

1U ^^

Q v^

PR

OJE

CT

NO

.

a.N

O

iu

T

Oo

*u.

SEND

REP

ORT

TO

:P

HO

NE

* £,IC

> P

"?S

"7

O~

jir>

zP

Ul(AUlfl-at

3NON

»OSZH

CONH

HO"N

OH

5311109

XKUVW

LLE

CTIO

N

SA

MP

LED

BY

:

UJZt-

Ul

o

FIE

LD ID

/ P

OIN

T O

F C

OLL

EC

TIO

NA

CC

UT

ES

TS

AM

PLE

#

-o

X

V

/<

CO

33

10

r

cr

\

^ —

K

'x(V)

o

.0t

S

.,-£

—

X

>1

ft

N,r"

^

2

<

5

-r>

A R O O O

CO

MM

EN

TS

/RE

MA

RK

S

i

E IN

FO

RM

*D

AT

A D

ELIV

ER

AB

L>A

TA T

UR

NA

RO

UN

D IN

FO

RM

ATIO

N

1

D

NJ

RE

DU

CE

D

D

CO

MM

ER

CIA

L "A

"D

N

JF

ull

D

CO

MM

ER

CIA

L'S

"D

FU

LL

CLP

D

S

TA

TE

FO

RM

SD

D

ISK

DE

LIV

ER

AB

LE

D

OT

HE

R (

SP

EC

IFY

) .

O

21

DA

YS

ST

AN

DA

RD

A

PP

RO

VE

D B

Y:

n 14

DA

YS

RU

SH

AO

N30U

3N

3 S

AV

a L

U

21 D

AY

Tlfa

fcA

RO

UN

D H

AR

DC

OP

Y.

EM

ER

GE

NC

Y O

R R

US

H IS

FA

XD

ATA

UN

LES

S P

RE

VIO

US

LY A

PP

RO

VE

D

IU

3cc\accooos1z'

Ul(0

OS-

ur

oT

P

o

i

m

IoIUa.

(0

•'if

T

UJU

Soi

1

^^^^v

^s

^ /

jN^

1§ -c4 t

SVA-

am

inte r

•*H\L

}UQ

j

RELI

NQUI

SHED

ffY

: f

4.

|

\

-\

S

f ri

'

tB

jc <n

SE

AL

f P

RE

SE

RV

E W

HE

RE

AP

PLI

CA

BLE

O

NtC

/f^

TE

MP

ER

AT

UR

a/'

r-T

y. r

RECE

IVED

BY:

5.

DATE

TIM

E:

O

S in

f35 r

site characterization reportbristol, pennsylvania 19007 submitted to: mr. bruce beitler ... mw-6 and...

Documents