six sigma case study (procurement) -...

31
22 Sep. 2017 1 Six Sigma Case Study (Procurement): Reduce COD and Improve Average Credit Period Prepared by: Salam Khader

Upload: trinhdat

Post on 10-May-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

22 Sep. 2017 1

Six Sigma Case Study (Procurement): Reduce COD and Improve Average Credit Period

Prepared by: Salam Khader

22 Sep. 2017

Salam Khader Almost 20 years of experience in Six Sigma

Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Project Leader and QA Process Control Manager

Expert in business process re-engineering

Able to solve problems that can lead to improved efficiency and reduced costs

Experienced in applying continuous improvement tools (5S, FMEA, Kaizen, KPIs, VA/ VE, SPC, etc…)

Trainer in process improvement tools and methods

2

22 Sep. 2017

Human Recourses: Repetitive Motion Injuries

Daimler Chrysler BR Line: Efficiency Improvement

BR/DR line: Excessive Free Lever Torque

General Motor GMT 800: High Pedal Parking Brake interference with the Mag-Beam

FORD VN-127Cell: Full factorial DOE to Maximize the Slippage Load

Chevrolet N -Truck: Efficiency Improvement

General Motor GMJ Line: Increase P/O/H and Reduce Overtime

Paint & Degreasing Operations : Incorrect Standard in Routing for Every Part

3

Samples of Six Sigma Projects Executed in USA

Twenty plus extremely successful Six Sigma projects in the Industrial sector such as:

22 Sep. 2017

Samples of Six Sigma Projects Executed in Kuwait

Procurement: Reduce COD and Improve Average Credit Period

Human Resources: Employees Turnover (Non-manual Regular)

Finance: Unbilled Revenue

Equipment: Cranes Downtime and Idle Time

Procurement: Just in Time Delivery of Project Material

Equipment: Earth Moving Equipment Breakdowns and Downtime

Procurement: Delivery of Materials through LPOs

Instant Access: Equipment Breakdowns and Idle Time

Fabrication: Reduce Weld Defects

4

22 Sep. 2017

Agenda

Vital Information and Project Definition

Primary & Secondary Metrics

Cause & Effect Analysis (Fish Bone Diagram)

XY Matrix and Vital X’s

Process Flowchart for Procurement

Identification of Root Causes

Primary & Secondary Metrics (After the implementation)

How to Sustain and Improve the Results?

5

22 Sep. 2017

Financial Benefits & Controller - Mohd Zaghloul (FAMC) / Philip Thomas (FAM) - Total indirect savings on bank interest @ 8.75% (estimated approx. KD 0.5 million) on the total value of procurement for the year 2007

Metric Baseline and Goal - Project start (baseline):

- % COD: 20% - Avg. credit period: 46 days

- Project completion (Goal): - % COD: < 10% - Avg. credit period: >= 60 Days

Project Name: “Reduce COD and Improve Avg Credit Period” Improve Procurement Cash Flow by reducing the % Cash On Delivery (COD) payments and increasing the average credit period for local purchase orders.

Champion Ali Sakkijha (PDM Corporate) Team Members Salam Khader (Black Belt) T. Bala (PUH - Corporate) Fayez Al Fakhoury (P&MCM – Kuwait) Sam George (Sr. Buyer) Shibu Madathil (PD Office Administrator)

Metrics - Primary: % COD Payments - Secondary: Average Credit Period

Vital Information

6

22 Sep. 2017

Goal: Percentage COD Payments <10%

Primary Metric

Week of Month 2007

Perc

enta

ge C

OD

on W

eekl

y Pr

ocur

emen

t

4th W

eek M

ar'07

3rd W

eek M

ar'07

2nd W

eek M

ar'07

1st W

eek M

ar'07

4th W

eek F

eb'07

3rd W

eek F

eb'07

2nd W

eek F

eb'07

1st W

eek F

eb'07

4th W

eek J

an'07

3rd W

eek J

an'07

2nd W

eek J

an'07

1st W

eek J

an'07

40

30

20

10

0

27

13

5

12

21

41

32

6

35

3

12

Weekly COD Payment Trend (%COD)(Jan to March 2007)

7

22 Sep. 2017

Primary Metric

Week of Month 2007

COD

Amou

nt (T

hous

ands

)

4 th W

eek M

a r'07

3rd W

eek M

a r'07

2nd

Week M

ar'0 7

1st W

eek M

ar'0 7

4th W

eek F

eb'07

3rd W

eek F

eb'07

2nd

Week F

eb'07

1st W

eek F

eb'07

4 th W

eek Ja

n'07

3 rd W

eek J

an'07

2nd W

eek J

an'07

1st W

eek J

an'07

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

717K

260K

46K

269K

780K

23K10K

437K

85K35K22K52K

Weekly COD Payment Trend (COD in KWD Value)(Jan to March 2007)

8

22 Sep. 2017

Secondary Metric

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

January February March April May

48.25 48.5 47.5 48

50

Did not meet the Goal

Avg

Cre

dit P

erio

d (D

ays)

9

Goal: Average Credit Period >= 60 Days

22 Sep. 2017

Fish Bone Diagram

ReduceCOD AndImproveAvgCreditPeriod

Market

Measurement

Methods

Maintenance

Machines

Personnel

Delay in MRV Approv al

Lack of commitment

Lack of confidence

Poor understanding of

Lack of Experience

Lack of Training

Commercial Knowledge

Negotiation Skills

ERP/ATS breakdown

Relationship withProj ects

Supplier relationships

Low v alue for moneyTesting & comm

Material Test CertificateWarranty Certificate

3rd Party inspectionWrong receiv ed material

Material deliv eredIncomplete PO Terms

Delay in MRVDirect deliv ery to

FAD Payment cycleAmendments to PO

Lack of planning

Contract conditions

Client Specific request

Poor Quality

Sole source

Complex specs

Economies of scale

Unrealistic deliv ery time

Fluctuation in Currency

Fluctuation in Materalprice

Market demand

Lack of competition

Political Situation

Cause and Effect for Procurement Cash Flow

10

22 Sep. 2017

XY Matrix

List of Vital X’s 1. Delay in MRV preparation

2. Delay in MRV approval from PM

3. FAD payment cycle

4. Lack of planning for required material

5. Negotiation skills

6. Supplier relationships

11

22 Sep. 2017

Process Flowchart

(1) Prepare Material Requisition and forward to Procurement Department

(2) Prepare/Forward RFQ and Collect Quotation from Suppliers

(3) Evaluation of Quotation and Negotiation with qualified suppliers

Yes Check

Commercial Conditions

(4) Issue Purchase Order to Suppliers

(6) Material Receipt at Stores

Check Material as per LPO

Inspection for Material

Quality

(3a) Renegotiate with Supplier

No

(5) Supplier Delivers Material to Store

(7) Return to Supplier

No

No

(5a) Supplier Submits Invoice to FAD

(8) Store Keeper Prepares MRV

(8a) MRV Approval by PM

(8b) MRV Submission to FAD

Yes

Yes

Match LPO & MRV

& Invoice

Yes

(4b) PO Copy to FAD

(4a) PO Copy to Stores

(9) FAD to post MRV / Invoice / PO in ATS system before 25th of Every Month

(10) Payment to Supplier

(10a) Hold Payment & clarify with PD/Stores

VA VA VA VA

NVA

NVA

VA

VA

VA

NVA

VA

VA

VA NVA

VA

VA VA VA VA

NVA

No

12

22 Sep. 2017

(9) FAD to post MRV / Invoice / PO in ATS system before 25th of every month

NVA

Input:

1. FAD cycle on bi-weekly

basis. 2. Payment due date to be

calculated from actual delivery date.

Output:

1. Timely payment to Supplier

Input:

1. Supplier Relationship 2. Negotiation Skills

Output:

1. Better Credit Terms 2. Avoid PO Amendments

Input:

1. MRV to be submitted

without delay on daily basis

Output:

1. Timely payment to Supplier

(3a) Renegotiate with Supplier

NVA

(8b) MRV Submission to FAD

VA

(1) Prepare Material Requisition and forward to Procurement Department

Input:

1. Proper planning

2. Consolidation of Requirement

Output:

1. More Negotiation Leverage for Better Credit Terms

VA

Identification of Root Causes

13

22 Sep. 2017

Month

Num

ber o

f Day

s

Jun'2

007

May

'2007

Apr'2

007

Mar

'2007

Feb'2

007

Jan'2

007

18

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

MRV_Month

May'2007Jun'2007

Jan'2007Feb'2007Mar'2007Apr'2007

1413

16

1213

8

Average Delay in MRV Preperation (Jan - Jun 2007)(KN - Kuwait)

1.1 Delay in MRV Preparation

14

22 Sep. 2017

(Summary of results of a survey conducted among storekeepers)

Ratin

gReasons for Delay

Count17.1 16.6 16.0 14.9 14.9 11.4 9.1

Cum % 17.1 33.7

3.0

49.7 64.6 79.4 90.9 100.0

2.9 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.0 1.6Percent

Lack of M

anpower

Project Manager la

te approval

Supplier Q

uality problems

Delay in In

spectio

n

Missing documents fro

m Suppliers

IT Net W

ork

Non availability o

f LPO at

Stores

5

4

3

2

1

0 0

1.62

2.62.62.82.93

Analysis on Reason for MRV Delay From Stores

1.2 Delay in MRV Preparation

15

22 Sep. 2017

Based on the results of the Survey conducted among Store Keepers, It has been concluded that “Delay in MRV Approval from PM” is not effecting the COD Payments.

16

2. Delay in MRV Approval from PM

22 Sep. 2017

3. FAD Payment Cycle

Months

Num

ber o

f Day

s

Jun'20

07

May'200

7

Apr'200

7

Mar'200

7

Feb'200

7

25

20

15

10

5

0

2624

21

1616

Average Delay in Payment From Due Date - 2007(KN- Kuwait)

17

22 Sep. 2017

4.1 Lack of planning for required material per Cost Center

Nu

mb

er

of

Ite

ms

Pe

rce

nt

Cost Center

Count 464

72747678808183848586

457

87888989909191929293

451

939494959595100

4464463873643633623442886 3032932551901701671611601321252191 118108100989591897971631112 6261805Percent 1713 6 4 4 4

7683 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2

6682 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1

6511 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0

5990 0 0 0 5

Cum % 17293640

496

44485154576062656770

Oth

er12

7312

8413

0612

1113

0413

4210

1113

4410

4313

1613

3812

8612

4013

0512

8512

7912

9213

2513

2412

2012

8012

1212

3911

9913

0713

1512

6312

8812

7813

0012

6712

6512

7291

9591

1212

6413

33A

BJW

S91

4091

85

5500

5000

4500

4000

3500

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

805

616263717989919598100

108

118

125

132

160

161

167

170

190

255

293

303

344

362

363

364

387

446

446

451

457

464

49659

9

651

66876

8

1112

2191

2886

Total Items Ordered (Jan to June 2007)

Nu

mb

er

of

Ite

ms

Pe

rce

nt

Cost Center

Count 25

9191 9292 9393 9494 9595

24

95100

21 2020 1313 1211 11336 9 8 8 7 6 6 6 6 6 5165 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 53Percent 30

8015 7 5 4 4 3 2 2 2 2

612 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

461 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

390 0 0 0 5

Cum % 304552 58

37

62 6569 7173 7577 7981 82

26

83 8485 8687 8889 8990 90O

ther

1255

1246

1211

1316

1300

1275

1256

1039

1333

1315

1304

1280

1036

1279

1342

1324

1306

1272

1043

1239

1325

1292

1265

1199

9112

1278

1212

1288

1264

9195

1267

1263

AB

JWS

9140

9185

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

53444555556666678891111121313202021242526373946

6180

165

336

Items Reordered Within Two Weeks Period(Jan to June 2007)

18

22 Sep. 2017

4.2 Lack of planning for required material per Business Lines

Nu

mb

er

of

Ite

ms

Pe

rce

nt

Business Lines

Count28.9 23.6 17.9 10.5 8.6 6.6 3.9

Cum % 28.9 52.5

5077

70.4 80.9 89.5 96.1 100.0

4147 3142 1842 1519 1153 683Percent

Oth

er

AB

J F

ab

Wo

rksh

op

Op

era

tio

ns

E&

FM

In

du

stri

al

Ma

int

(Po

we

r)

Pe

tro

leu

m &

Ch

em

ica

l

E&

FM

Fa

cili

tie

s M

an

ag

em

en

t

EP

C O

pe

rati

on

s (B

uil

din

g S

erv

ice

s)

Eq

uip

me

nt

Div

isio

n

20000

15000

10000

5000

0

100

80

60

40

20

0683115315191842314241475077

Total Items Ordered(Jan 2007 to June)

Nu

mb

er

of

Ite

ms

Pe

rce

nt

Business Lines

Count52.3 21.3 9.2 5.3 5.1 3.6 3.2

Cum % 52.3 73.6

388

82.7 88.0 93.1 96.8 100.0

158 68 39 38 27 24Percent

Oth

er

E&

FM

In

du

stri

al

Ma

int

(Po

we

r)

AB

J F

ab

Wo

rksh

op

Op

era

tio

ns

Pe

tro

leu

m &

Ch

em

ica

l

EP

C O

pe

rati

on

s (B

uil

din

g S

erv

ice

s)

E&

FM

Fa

cili

tie

s M

an

ag

em

en

t

Eq

uip

me

nt

Div

isio

n800700600500400300200100

0

1008060

4020

02427383968

158

388

Items Reordered Within One Week Period(Jan 2007 to June)

19

22 Sep. 2017

5. Negotiation Skills

Payment Terms for Credit Period

Num

ber o

f Sup

plie

rs

9 0 Day

s

75 Day

s

60 Day

s

45 Day

s

30 Day

s

15 Day

sCOD

400

300

200

100

0

VariableAfter NegotiationBefore Negotiation

75

1

263

21

178

6

98

00

97

0

427

5

113

Payment Terms Before & After Negotiations - 2007

Before Negotiation

After Negotiation

20

22 Sep. 2017

% B

usin

ess

Line

Perc

ent

Business Line

Count45.5 24.2 11.1 7.1 5.1 4.0 3.0

Cum % 45.5 69.7

45

80.8 87.9 92.9 97.0 100.0

24 11 7 5 4 3Percent

Othe r

E& FM- In

dus tri

al M

aint

(Pow

er)

Fabric

ation

Wor

ksho

p Ope

rati o

ns

E& FM

- I ndu

s trial

Ma in

t

Petrol e

um &

Che

mical

EPC Ope

ratio

ns (B

uildi

ng Ser

v ices)

E& F

M- Fac

ili ties

Man

agem

ent

100

80

60

40

20

0

100

80

60

40

20

0345711

24

45

PO Cancellations Summary Per Business Line(Jan 2007 to June)

6.1 Supplier Relationships

21

22 Sep. 2017

% P

O C

ance

llatio

ns

Perc

ent

Reasons for PO Cancellation

Count12.0 7.0 6.0 3.0 5.0

Cum % 67.0 79.0 86.0 92.0

67

95.0 100.0

12 7 6 3 5Percent 67.0

Oth

er

Wro

ng M

ater

ial S

uppl

y

Item

Spe

cific

atio

n C

hang

ed

PO P

rice

Dis

crep

ancy

Item

Not

Ava

ilabl

e w

ith S

uppl

ier

Mat

eria

l Not

Req

uire

d

100

80

60

40

20

0

100

80

60

40

20

02367

12

67

236712

67

PO Cancellation Summary Per Reasons(Jan 2007 to June)

6.2 Supplier Relationships

22

22 Sep. 2017

Results

23

22 Sep. 2017

Goal: Percentage COD Payments <10%

Primary Metric

Week of Month 2007

Perc

enta

ge C

OD

on W

eekl

y Pr

ocur

emen

t

2nd Week A

ug'07

1st Week

Aug'07

4th Week

July'07

3rd Wee

k July'0

7

2nd W

eek J

ul y'07

1st Wee

k Jul y

'07

4th Week J

une'07

3rd Week J

une'07

2nd W

eek June'07

1st Week J

une'07

4th Week M

ay'07

3rd Week M

ay'07

2nd Week M

ay'07

1st W

eek May'0

7

4th W

eek A

pr'07

3rd W

eek A

pr'07

2nd Week

Apr'

07

1st Week

Apr'0

7

4th W

eek M

ar'07

3rd W

eek M

ar'07

2nd W

eek M

ar'07

1st Wee

k Mar'0

7

4th Week F

eb'07

3rd Week F

eb'07

2nd Week F

eb'07

1st Week F

eb'07

4t h W

eek Jan'07

3rd W

eek Jan'0

7

2nd Week

Jan'07

1st Week

Jan'07

40

30

20

10

0

2110

5

0114

0.34

21

8

1

656

27

13

5

12

21

41

32

6

35

3

12

Weekly COD Payment Trend (%COD)(Jan 2007 To Present)

GoalPrimary Metric: % COD Payments < 10%

24

22 Sep. 2017

Primary Metric

Week of Month 2007

COD

Amou

nt (T

hous

ands

)

2nd W

eek A

ug'0

7

1st W

eek A

ug'07

4th W

eek Ju

ly'07

3rd W

eek Ju

ly'07

2nd W

eek Ju

ly'07

1st W

eek Ju

ly'07

4th W

eek J

une'0

7

3rd W

eek J

une'0

7

2nd W

eek J

une'0

7

1st W

eek J

une'0

7

4th W

eek May

'07

3rd W

eek May

'07

2nd W

eek May

'07

1st W

eek May

'07

4th W

eek A

pr'07

3rd W

eek A

pr'07

2nd W

eek A

pr'07

1st W

eek A

pr '07

4th W

eek M

ar'07

3rd W

eek M

ar'07

2nd W

eek M

ar'07

1st W

eek M

ar'07

4th W

eek F

eb'07

3rd W

eek F

eb'0

7

2nd W

eek F

eb'0

7

1st W

eek F

eb'07

4th W

eek J

an'07

3rd W

eek J

an'07

2nd W

eek J

an'07

1st W

eek J

an'07

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

023K18K13K5K

108K

3K12K12K

92K

4K

91K

18K10K

166K

23K42K37K86K

717K

260K

46K

269K

780K

23K10K

437K

85K

35K22K52K

Weekly COD Payment Trend (COD in KWD Value)(Jan 2007 To Present)

25

22 Sep. 2017

Secondary Metric

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

January February March April May June July August

48.25 48.5 47.5 48

50

64.75

69 70.5

Did not meet the Goal Exceeded the Goal

Avg

Cre

dit P

erio

d (D

ays)

26

Goal: Average Credit Period >= 60 Days

22 Sep. 2017

Week of Month 2007

Avg

Cred

it/LP

O

2nd W

eek A

ug'07

3rd W

eek J

uly'07

4th W

eek J

une'0

7

1st W

eek J

une'0

7

2nd W

eek M

ay'07

3rd W

eek A

pr'07

4th W

eek M

ar'07

1st W

eek M

ar'07

2nd W

eek F

eb'07

3rd W

eek J

an'07

75

70

65

60

55

50

45

72

69

71

696969

676768

59

55

51

4847

49

474848

4647

48494949

484847

50

47

49

(Jan 2007 to Present)

Time Series Plot of Avg Credit/ LPO

Goal Avg. Credit Period >= 60 Days

Weekly Average Credit/ LPO

27

22 Sep. 2017

Week of Month 2007

Valu

e in

Sav

ings

(Tho

usan

ds K

WD)

2nd W

eek Au

g'07

3rd W

eek July'07

4th W

eek Ju

n e'07

1st W

eek J

une'07

2nd Wee

k May

'07

3rd W

eek Ap

r'07

4th W

eek M

ar'07

1st W

eek M

ar'07

2nd Wee

k Feb

'07

3rd W

eek Ja

n'07

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

570K

548K

520K

0.49

9

461K

428K

404K

378K

365K

327K

312K

285K

271K

250K

229K

204K

197K

188K

173K

152K

132K

123K

101K

67K

59K

47K

36K

21K

13K

5K

(Jan 2007 to Present)

Time Series Plot of Savings on Credit

Goal.5 Million KWD

Weekly Cumulative Savings on Credit Terms

28

22 Sep. 2017

How to sustain and improve the results? Procurement:

1. Develop and implement a checklist to monitor the negotiation process.

2. Maintain a log (by storekeeper) to monitor the receipt of LPOs on site prior to material receipt.

Material Control:

1. Discuss with IT to amend the software generated Material Receipt Voucher (MRV) form to reflect the “Actual Date of Receipt” entered in the system.

2. MRVs to be prepared & submitted to Finance Department within 2 days from the date of material receipt at stores.

3. Establish and implement a system for continuously monitoring delays in MRV preparation.

4. Add delays in MRV preparation as a KPI in the performance of the Material Control Unit.

29

22 Sep. 2017

How to sustain and improve the results? Finance:

1. Calculate the “Effective Due Date” of payment from the actual date of material receipt at stores.

2. Consider bi-weekly payment processing cycle instead of monthly payment cycle (25th of every month).

Operations: 1. Enhance day to day material planning to achieve Negotiation Leverage.

2. Reduce frequent PO cancellations to avoid conflicts with Suppliers. 3. Ensure timely completion of Material Inspection. 4. Instruct respective Project staff not to collect Supplier invoices at Project site.

Six Sigma: 1. Training of Senior Management (Champions Training) 2. Implement Six Sigma concept in selective areas of concern across the company for

continuous improvement.

30

22 Sep. 2017

Questions?

31