sixth assembly 13th meeting december 6th, 2016 agendalakshman mulpuri noah betman samantha kennedy...
TRANSCRIPT
I. Call to Order
II. Opening Roll Call
III. Approval of the Agenda
IV. Approval of the Previous Minutes
a. Minutes from the 12th meeting on November 29th, 2016 (Sent via email)
V. Guest Speakers
a. Julia Fiks Salem – Development Summer Internship Program (D-SIP)
b. Jack Bernard – Associate General Counsel to the Office of the Vice President
c. Dr. Ashley Lucas – Professor of Latino(a) Theater for Social Change
VI. Community Concerns
VII. Executive Communications
VIII. Report of the Speaker
IX. Representative Reports
X. Committee Reports
a. Rules Committee
b. Finance Committee (Report Attached)
c. Communications Committee
d. Resolutions Committee (Report Attached)
XI. Election and Recall of Members
a. Election Tie-Breaker for College of Architecture and Urban Planning Representative
XII. New Business
a. A.R. 6-022: A Resolution to Allocate Funds to the Student Organization Funding
Commission
b. A.R. 6-023: A Resolution to Amend the Operating Procedures to Streamline Time
Extension Rules
c. A.R. 6-024: A Resolution to Amend the Election Code to Reduce the UEC Burden of
Persuasion
d. A.R. 6-025: A Resolution to Amend the Election Code to Require Write-In Candidates to
Consent to be Elected
e. A.R. 6-026: A Resolution to Support Moving City Council Elections From August
Primaries to During the Academic Year
XIII. Old Business
a. A.R. 6-019: A Resolution to Provide Funding for the Food Recovery Network
b. A.R. 6-020: A Resolution in Support of Printing SAPAC’s Crisis Line on Student
MCards
c. A.R. 6-021: A Resolution to Support Undocumented and DACAmented Students, as well
as the Continuation of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Program
XIV. Motions and Other Business
XV. Announcements and Matters Arising
XVI. Closing Roll Call
XVII. Adjournment
Sixth Assembly – 13th Meeting
December 6th, 2016
Agenda
Committee Report Committee: Resolutions Date/Time/Location of Meeting: 12/4/16. Location: Room G, CSG Offices. Attendance:
Caitlin Christian
Josh Martin
Lakshman Mulpuri
Noah Betman
Samantha Kennedy Business before the committee (Number & Name):
A.R. 6-020: A Resolution in Support Of Printing SAPAC’S Crisis Line On Student
A.R. 6-021: A Resolution To Support Undocumented And DACAmented Students, As Well As The Continuation Of The Continuation Of The Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Program
Notes about discussion:
No changes made.
Other things discussed:
Nothing
1
ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 6-022
A RESOLUTION TO ALLOCATE FUNDS TO THE STUDENT ORGANIZATION
FUNDING COMMISSION
WHEREAS, The Student Organization Funding commission manages a complex and
dynamic budget of about $217,000 for the Fall 2016 semester; AND 2
WHEREAS, SOFC supports the many registered student organizations of the
University of Michigan student body through the allocation of funds for 4
costs such as fundraisers, speaker events, event advertising, recreational
activities et cetera; AND 6
WHEREAS, there has been continued, increasing demand for funds, reaching nearly
$500,000 for the Fall 2016 semester as well as an unpredictable and 8
inconsistent funding request profile which makes predictive accounting
difficult over the course of the semester; AND 10
WHEREAS, additional funds allocated to SOFC from the Legislative Discretionary
account would lessen the financial risk to CSG, provide financial cushion 12
and remove the possibility of not upholding previous liabilities to student
organizations; AND THEREFORE BE IT 14
RESOLVED, that the Central Student Government Assembly authorize the transfer of
$7,000 from the Legislative Discretionary account for the Fall 2016 16
budget to the Student Organization Funding Commission account.
Authors
______________________________ _____________________________
JonMarco Cloutier, Chairman SOFC Kohlton Johnson, Treasurer CSG
Attest
______________________________ _____________________________
Tania Haddad, Engineering Joe Goldberg
Speaker of the Assembly Vice Speaker of the Assembly
2
President’s Approval
____________________________
David Schafer
Presented to the Assembly for First Reads on ___________________________
Presented to the Assembly for Second Reads on _________________________
Yes: _____ No: _____ Abs: _____ Date: _______________________
Signature Necessary: ______ Signature Received By _________________: ______
18
1
ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 6-023
A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE OPERATING PROCEDURES TO STREAMLINE
TIME EXTENSION RULES
WHEREAS, The Assembly rules regarding the extension of speaking time limits, both
the total time and number of extension permitted, are mostly set on a case 2
by case basis leaving a patchwork of rules of extending time AND
WHEREAS, Having limits such as permitting a total extension of three minutes but 4
requiring it to be done in two votes for one and a half minute expansions
interrupts the flow of meetings; AND 6
WHEREAS, several other sections of the agenda do not currently have the options for
time extension or have over-restrictive time limits that, in the view of the 8
authors, need simplification; THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that the following changes be made to Chapter VII §B(5) to permit any 10
number of motions to extend time so long as the total amount of time
given in these motions does not exceed the total limit for extend time on 12
that business:
4. A motion to extend time for an order of business shall be for an 14
amount of time not exceeding half the stated time limit for that business
unless otherwise noted the remaining amount of extension time 16
permitted for that business. Given a time limit of x that can be
extended n times, the maximum allowable time with extensions for that 18
business shall be x+n*(0.5*x) a n number of motions to extend time,
the sum of all the time, tn, added by these motions including the 20
current proposed motion, c, must be less than or equal Text, the
maximum time by which an order of business can be extend: 22
∑ 𝒕𝒏 ≤ 𝑻𝒆𝒙𝒕𝒄𝒏=𝟏 .
AND BE IT FURTHER 24
RESOLVED, that the following rule be added under Chapter VII §D(5) and the
following rules be numbered accordingly to set a default time limit to 26
extended time that will be in place unless a different amount is specified
for an individual business. 28
5. Total extended time for an order of business cannot be greater
than the time originally allocated for said business, unless a different 30
limit is otherwise specifically noted.
AND BE IT FURTHER 32
2
RESOLVED, that the specific wording regarding the number of extensions each
individual time limit can have be struck from the following sections: 34
Chapter VII §K(5), §L(5), §M(2), §N(2), §O(3), §O(6), §P(3), §T(2),
Chapter XII §D(9) 36
AND BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the following text be added to Chapter VII §M(2) to specifically state 38
how long a Chair of an Executive Commission has to give a report:
2. … any Chair of an Executive Commission, or his or her designee, may 40
also make an official report to the Assembly, lasting up to 5 minutes,
and may inform the Speaker or the Vice Speaker of their intention. 42
AND BE IT FINALLY
RESOLVED, that the clause in Chapter VII §O(5) be struck and the following changes 44
be made to §O(3), §O(4):
3. A Representative may speak for up to five minutes. The Assembly may 46
extend the time allotted once by a simple majority vote. This time may
not be yielded to anyone other than a fellow Representative, except to 48
ask questions.
4. There shall be an additional three minutes allotted for questions 50
following the Report of a Representative. This time may be yielded to
anyone. 52
Authors
_______________________________ _______________________________
Jared Ferguson, Rackham Ramon Martinez, Rackham
Chair, Rules Committee Vice Chair, Rules Committee
Attest
______________________________ _____________________________
Tania Haddad, Engineering Joe Goldberg, LSA
Speaker of the Assembly Vice Speaker of the Assembly
3
President’s Approval
____________________________
Bobby Dishell
Presented to the Assembly for First Reads on ___________________________
Presented to the Assembly for Second Reads on _________________________
Yes: _____ No: _____ Abs: _____ Date: _______________________
Signature Necessary: ______ Signature Received By _________________: ______
1
ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 6-024
RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE ELECTION CODE TO REDUCE THE UEC BURDEN
OF PERSUASION
WHEREAS, The University Election Committee is charged with hearing assessing
elections complaints and determining if demerits ought to be issued AND 2
WHEREAS, the burden of proof threshold beyond a reasonable doubt is very difficult
to prove and is typically only applied in criminal proceedings and has 4
been shown to be very difficult to arrive at in regards to election
complaints, while the threshold of clear and convincing evidence is less 6
strict but still a greater degree of believability must be met than the
common standard of proof in civil actions, a preponderance of the 8
evidence; THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that Article VI. § C(4) of the Compiled Code be amended to state: 10
Burden of Persuasion. At all stages of the complaint process, the UEC
and the CSJ shall assume that the allegations set forth in the complaint 12
are not true. At all stages, the petitioner shall have the burden of proof of
showing that the allegations set forth in the complaint are true beyond a 14
reasonable doubt with clear and convincing evidence. If a UEC decision
is appealed to the CSJ, questions of fact are reviewed using a clearly 16
erroneous standard and questions of law are reviewed using a de novo
standard. 18
Authors
_______________________________ _______________________________
Jared Ferguson, Rackham Ramon Martinez, Rackham
Chair, Rules Committee Vice Chair, Rules Committee
Attest
______________________________ _____________________________
Tania Haddad Joe Goldberg
Speaker of the Assembly Vice Speaker of the Assembly
2
President’s Approval
____________________________
Michael Proppe
Presented to the Assembly for First Reads on ___________________________
Presented to the Assembly for Second Reads on _________________________
Yes: _____ No: _____ Abs: _____ Date: _______________________
Signature Necessary: ______ Signature Received By _________________: ______
1
ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 6-025
A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE ELECTION CODE TO REQUIRE WRITE-IN
CANDIDATES TO CONSENT TO BE ELECTED
WHEREAS, Currently, successful write-in candidates automatically take their
positions regardless of whether they express acceptance of taking that 2
position or not; AND
WHEREAS, It is the opinion of the author that a person should not forced to hold a 4
position they do not want to and write-in candidates should be required to
willingly accept their election and confirm they want to take the position 6
rather than be automatically given it; THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that Article VI. § G(2)b of the Complied Code be amended to state: 8
b. Once unofficial results have been released the Election Director shall
notify via email elected write-in candidates of their election to their CSG 10
position pending certification of the election results, and stated that
written acceptance of their election to said CSG position is required if 12
the candidate wants to said position.
AND BE IT FINALLY 14
RESOLVED that the following text be added as Article VI. § G(2)c of the Complied
Code: 16
c. After being notified by the Election Director of their successful
election, write-in candidates must provide written acceptance of their 18
elected position to the Election Director via email or other
appropriate method. If the candidate declines the position or does 20
not provide written acceptance within 10 days of the UEC certifying
the results, the seat will be left vacant. 22
Authors
_______________________________ _______________________________
Jared Ferguson, Rackham Ramon Martinez, Rackham
Chair, Rules Committee Vice Chair, Rules Committee
Attest
2
______________________________ _____________________________
Tania Haddad Joe Goldberg
Speaker of the Assembly Vice Speaker of the Assembly
President’s Approval
____________________________
Michael Proppe
Presented to the Assembly for First Reads on ___________________________
Presented to the Assembly for Second Reads on _________________________
Yes: _____ No: _____ Abs: _____ Date: _______________________
Signature Necessary: ______ Signature Received By _________________: ______
24
1
ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 6-026
A RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT MOVING CITY COUNCIL ELECTIONS FROM
AUGUST PRIMARIES TO DURING THE ACADEMIC YEAR
WHEREAS, 44,718 students were enrolled at the University of Michigan in Fall
20161, making them a key constituency in Ann Arbor; AND 2
WHEREAS, the United States Census Bureau estimates the population of Ann Arbor
to be 117,070 as of 20152; AND 4
WHEREAS, turnout in the 2016 Presidential election at the four precincts that feature
many student voters ranged from 42.8% to 49.71%3; AND 6
WHEREAS, Ann Arbor is one of only three cities in the state of Michigan that has
partisan primary elections and general elections in November, Ionia and 8
Ypsilanti being the other two,4 AND
WHEREAS, students, one of the largest constituencies in Ann Arbor, are largely 10
unable to vote in the August Primary elections as most students are not
on campus during the summer; AND 12
WHEREAS, turnout in the City Council primary elections is exceptionally low,
ranging from 10.43% in 2013 to 10.46% in 20154; AND 14
WHEREAS, the Ann Arbor City Council rejected a proposal to move their elections to
a nonpartisan November election on July 7, 2016 by a vote of 7-45, 16
THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, CSG supports the city of Ann Arbor switching to non-partisan November 18
elections; AND BE IT FINALLY
RESOLVED, that the authors of this resolution will present this resolution to the Ann 20
Arbor City Council.
1 http://www.ro.umich.edu/report/16enrollmentsummary.pdf 2 http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/2603000 3 https://www.michigandaily.com/section/election/greater-student-turnout-could-shifted-state-
towards-clinton-narrow-michigan-race 4 https://electionresults.ewashtenaw.org/electionreporting/aug2015/index.jsp 4 http://annarborchronicle.com/2012/06/17/column-lets-put-life-into-city-elections/ 5 http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2015/07/ann_arbor_officials_vote_down.html
2
Authors
____________________________ ____________________________
Nadine Jawad, Public Policy Noah Betman, LSA
Attest
______________________________ _____________________________
Tania Haddad, Engineering Joe Goldberg
Speaker of the Assembly Vice Speaker of the Assembly
President’s Approval
____________________________
David Schafer
Presented to the Assembly for First Reads on ___________________________
Presented to the Assembly for Second Reads on _________________________
Yes: _____ No: _____ Abs: _____ Date: _______________________
Signature Necessary: ______ Signature Received By _________________: ______
ASSEMBLYRESOLUTION 6-019
A RESOLUTION TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE FOOD RECOVERY NETWORK
WHEREAS, FRN is committed to fighting unnecessary food waste and preventing hunger in the greater Ann Arbor community ; AND 1
WHEREAS, Food Recovery Network (FRN) at University of Michigan is a student volunteer organization that goes into dining halls to recover surplus perishable food and donate it to local food banks, including Ann Arbor’s Food Gatherers ; AND 2
WHEREAS, As a student organization, FRN is additionally committed to providing education to students on the issues of community hunger and food waste through hands-on opportunities and educational outreach; AND
WHEREAS, Since FRN’s founding in Fall of 2012, they have recovered over 20,000 lbs (10 tons) of food from Bursley Dining Hall, South Quad Dining Hall, East Quad Dining Hall, The Hill Dining Center, Martha Cook, the Law Quad, Dance Marathon at U-M, Michigan athletics, and other campus and off-campus events; AND
WHEREAS, FRN engages with the community, on and off campus, through volunteer work days with Food Gatherers and community education events like our annual Food for thought Dinner. The Food for Thought dinner serves recovered food from local restaurants and invites local leaders involved in sustainability and hunger to speak about the impact of food waste and food insecurity; AND
http://www.foodgatherers.org/?module=Page&sID=hunger-facts1
The left over food is perfectly good food that the dining hall isn't intending to use anymore. It is frozen within food 2
safety regulations, and delivered in coolers that prevent thawing (potential for bacteria growth). Any food in packaging that we deem "unsafe" is composted at Food Gatherers (this is very rare as Michigan Dining is fantastic about complying to food safety procedures, but I mention it to assure you of the quality of food we deliver). The food we get is what the dining hall can't repurpose. Think of prepared dishes like lo mein, fried rice, or curry. While this food is still good and makes a great contribution to a small soup kitchens offerings, the dining halls don't want to serve their customers repeat dishes within a week and the quantities of food we save are not enough for them to save for themselves for reuse. For example, two or three full pans of curry chicken could not begin to serve a crowd at a large dining hall like Bursley, but could make a great contribution to a small soup kitchen that doesn't have facilities to cook full meals each night. Where as the dining hall might reuse left over baked chicken to repurpose into soups or chicken salad. Another note on safety: we get the recipe and ingredient information from the dining halls to ensure that all allergens or preparation considerations (Kosher/Halal) are accounted for.
WHEREAS, FRN operates exclusively off of 15-20 student volunteers and their gas money to gather the food and deliver it to Food Gatherers who distribute it around Washtenaw County; AND
WHEREAS, FRN runs two cars, five days a week, two our of every three weeks; AND
WHEREAS, the pans and coolers used by FRN are from 2012 and have accumulated wear and tear; AND
WHEREAS, FRN needs 100 pans and matching lids per dining hall per semester, and pans are $43.77/100 pans and matching lids are $24.98/100 lids ; AND 3 4
WHEREAS, FRN plans to begin recovering food this fall in North Quad Dining Hall and university cafes on a more regular basis (ie. Beansters, Berts, Ugos, Fields), IF they receive funding for an additional freezer; AND
WHEREAS, FRN’s requests are not eligible for SOFC funding because they are capital goods; THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that in total the Central Student Government Legislative Fund allocates up to $4,012.50 to the Food Recovery Network, based on the amounts that follow; AND BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the Central Student Government Legislative Fund allocates $200 to FRN with the intention of subsidizing gas of volunteers in order for them to attract more volunteers; AND BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the Central Student Government Legislative Fund allocates $412.50 to FRN with the intention of providing pans and lids for storage in dining halls; AND BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the Central Student Government Legislative Fund allocates up to $400 to FRN to provide supplies for community engagement and education events such as the “Food for Thought” dinner; AND BE IT FURTHER
http://www.supplycity.com/thanksgiving/steam-pans-and-lids/1-2-size-deep-aluminum-steam-pan-100-per-case?3
gclid=COeX6ZntoNACFQiQaQodC90F2w
http://www.supplycity.com/thanksgiving/steam-pans-and-lids/aluminum-flat-lid-for-1-2-steam-table-100-per-case?4
gclid=CNKN76ftoNACFQWpaQodh-4FQw
RESOLVED, that the Central Student Government Legislative Fund allocates up to$3,000 to purchase a freezer to store food in one of the dining halls that FRN hopes to expand to; AND BE IT FINALLY
RESOLVED, that FRN will report to the Central Student Government Assembly in the Winter 2017 semester about the status of the applicable funds.
Authors
_______________________________ _______________________________
Joseph Goldberg, LSA Anne Grech, Communications Director FRN
Attest
______________________________ _____________________________
Tania Haddad, Engineering Joe Goldberg
Speaker of the Assembly Vice Speaker of the Assembly
President’s Approval
Item Quantity Price Total
gas 1 $200 $200
pans 6 $43.77 $262.62
lids 6 $24.98 $149.88
community engagement 1 $400 $400
freezer 1 $3,000 $3,000
TOTAL $4,012.50
____________________________
David Schafer
Presented to the Assembly for First Reads on ___________________________
Presented to the Assembly for Second Reads on _________________________
Yes: _____ No: _____ Abs: _____ Date: _______________________
Signature Necessary: ______ Signature Received By _________________: ______
1
ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 6-020
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF PRINTING SAPAC’S CRISIS LINE ON STUDENT
MCARDS
WHEREAS, The Central Student Government at the University of Michigan is
dedicated to campus safety and promotion of campus resources; AND 2
WHEREAS, Mcards are a student’s main identification and are used frequently by
nearly all students; AND 4
WHEREAS, the Sexual Assault Prevention and Awareness Center (hereafter SAPAC)
and its crisis line are valuable educational and supportive resources for 6
survivors of sexual assault and misconduct as well as all students; AND
WHEREAS, 53.6% of survivors on campus have never told anyone about their 8
experience and only 3.6% have reported their experience or used any
university resource1; AND 10
WHEREAS, SAPAC’s crisis line “…is available 24-hours a day and is staffed by
professionals, who provide confidential crisis intervention, information 12
and referral services to survivors of sexual assault, dating/domestic
violence, sexual harassment and stalking. 24-hours-a-day information and 14
support is also available for the friends, partners, and family members of
survivors”2; AND 16
WHEREAS, SAPAC student co-coordinators have shown support for the addition of
SAPAC’s crisis line on student Mcards as a way to promote awareness of 18
the resource and demonstrate that sexual misconduct is not tolerated and
survivors are supported; THEREFORE BE IT 20
RESOLVED, The Central Student Government supports the initiative to print SAPAC’s
crisis line on the back of student Mcards, as follows: “SAPAC 24-Hour 22
Crisis Line: (734) 764-7771”; AND BE IT FURTHER
1 U-M 2015 Campus Climate Surveys Regarding Sexual Misconduct
2 https://sapac.umich.edu/article/182
2
RESOLVED, The Central Student Government will work with LSA Student 24
Government and any other interested student governments on this
project; AND BE IT FINALLY 26
RESOLVED, The Central Student Government shall work with SAPAC and the
University of Michigan Treasurer’s Office to lobby for the addition of the 28
SAPAC crisis line to the back of student Mcards.
30
Authors
_______________________________ _______________________________
Samantha Kennedy, LSA Yong-Joon Kim
Attest
______________________________ _____________________________
Noah Betman, LSA Tania Haddad, Engineering
Speaker of the Assembly Vice Speaker of the Assembly
President’s Approval
____________________________
David Schafer
Presented to the Assembly for First Reads on ___________________________
Presented to the Assembly for Second Reads on _________________________
Yes: _____ No: _____ Abs: _____ Date: _______________________
Signature Necessary: ______ Signature Received By _________________: ______
1
ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 6-021
A RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT UNDOCUMENTED AND DACAMENTED
STUDENTS, AS WELL AS THE CONTINUATION OF THE DEFERRED ACTION FOR
CHILDHOOD ARRIVALS (DACA) PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, established in 2012,
provides eligible undocumented immigrants with the ability to “apply for 2
temporary deferrals of deportations and [for] work permits”1; AND
WHEREAS, DACA has enabled more than 700,000 individuals brought to the United 4
States before their 16th birthday to stay in the United States2; AND
WHEREAS, some the beneficiaries of this program include students previously or 6
currently enrolled in postsecondary educational institutions, such as the
University of Michigan; AND 8
WHEREAS in a recent national survey, conducted in June 2015 to analyze the impact
of DACA, 92% of respondents who were then enrolled in school noted 10
that DACA allowed them to “pursue educational opportunities [they]
previously could not” have pursued3; AND 12
WHEREAS, recently there has been a serious discussion about ending the DACA
program4; AND 14
WHEREAS, in light of such discussions, University of Michigan President Mark
Schlissel and more than 250 other college and university presidents 16
across the United States signed a letter, which called the need to uphold
and continue the DACA program a “moral imperative” and “national 18
necessity”5; THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that Central Student Government joins President Schlissel and other 20
higher education leaders in their call to uphold and continue the DACA
program; AND BE IT FINALLY 22
1 https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/immigration/news/2015/07/09/117054/results-from-
a-nationwide-survey-of-daca-recipients-illustrate-the-programs-impact/ 2 Ibid. 1. 3 Ibid. 1. 4 http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/us/immigrants-donald-trump-daca.html. 5 https://www.pomona.edu/news/2016/11/21-college-university-presidents-call-us-uphold-and-
continue-daca.
2
RESOLVED, that Central Student Government reaffirms its support of undocumented
and DACAmented students at the University of Michigan and across the 24
country.
Authors
______________________________ _____________________________
David Schafer, LSA Micah Griggs, LSA
President Vice President
_____________________________
Noah Betman, LSA
Chief of Staff
Attest
______________________________ _____________________________
Tania Haddad, Engineering Joe Goldberg
Speaker of the Assembly Vice Speaker of the Assembly
President’s Approval
____________________________
David Schafer
Presented to the Assembly for First Reads on ___________________________
Presented to the Assembly for Second Reads on _________________________
Yes: _____ No: _____ Abs: _____ Date: _______________________
Signature Necessary: ______ Signature Received By _________________: ______