sj figure1 location02 - santa clara county, california -...

24
· | } þ 87 · | } þ 17 · | } þ 237 § ¨ ¦ 880 § ¨ ¦ 680 § ¨ ¦ 680 § ¨ ¦ 280 t u 101 San Jose International Airport Location Map Figure 1

Upload: doxuyen

Post on 23-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

·|}þ87

·|}þ17

·|}þ237

§̈¦880

§̈¦680

§̈¦680

§̈¦280

tu101

San Jose International AirportLocation Map

Figure 1

SAN JOSE

MILPITAS

SAN JOSE

SAR

ATOG

A

SAN JOSE

CAMPBELL

SAN JOSE

SAN

TA C

LAR

ASU

NN

YVA

LE

SANTA CLARASAN JOSE

SUNNYVALE

§̈¦680

§̈¦280

§̈¦880

EL CAMINO REAL

BERRYESSA RD

HEDDING ST

ALM

ADEN

EXPY

SIERRA RD

LAW

RE

NC

E E

XP

Y

MONTEREY RD

PIEDMONT RD

CENTRAL EXPY

CALAVERAS BLVD

SAN

TOM

AS EX

PY1ST

ST

QU

ITO R

D

·|}þ85

·|}þ17

·|}þ87

·|}þ237

(/101

FlightpathsFlightpath

Runway

±0 5,000 10,0002,500Feet

This map created by Santa Clara County Planning Office. The GIS data was compiledfrom various sources. While deemed reliable, the Planning Office assumes no liability.

4/7/2009 - Y:\Matt\ALUC\projects\SJ\SJ_figure3a_flights_v1.mxd

San Jose International Airport

Aircraft Flight TracksFigure 3a

§̈¦680

§̈¦880

§̈¦280

1ST ST

MARKET ST

BERRYESSA RD

ALM

ADEN

EXPY

SIERRA RD

HEDDING

ST

MONTAGUE EXPY

STEVENS CREEK BLVD

LAW

REN

CE

EXPY

CENTRAL EXPY

SAN

TOM

AS EX

PY

EL CAMINO REAL

(/101

·|}þ237

·|}þ17

·|}þ87

MILPITAS

SAN JOSE

CAMPBELL

SA

N JOSE

SAN

TA C

LAR

ASU

NN

YVA

LE

SANTA CLARA

SAN JOSE

FlightpathsFlightpath

Runway

±0 5,000 10,0002,500Feet

This map created by Santa Clara County Planning Office. The GIS data was compiledfrom various sources. While deemed reliable, the Planning Office assumes no liability.

4/7/2009 - Y:\Matt\ALUC\projects\SJ\SJ_figure3b_flights_v1.mxd

San Jose International Airport

Aircraft Flight TracksFigure 3b

SANTA CLARA

SAN

JOSE

±0 4,000 8,0002,000

Feet

This map created by Santa Clara County Planning Office. The GIS data was compiledfrom various sources. While deemed reliable, the Planning Office assumes no liability.

1/25/2010 - Y:\Matt\ALUC\projects\SJ\SJC_figure4a_landuse_SJ04.mxd

San Jose International Airport

General Plan Land UseCity of San Jose

Figure 4a

General Plan Land Use Designations

" " " " "

" " " " "

" " " " " Industrial Park

Industrial Park/General Commercial

Industrial Park/Preferred Hotel Site

No Underlying Designation

XW XW XW

XW XW XWPublic Park and Open Space

XW XW XW

XW XW XW

XW XW XW

XW XW XWXW XW XWXW XW XW

Public/Quasi-Public

General Commercial

) ) ) )

) ) ) )

) ) ) )

Neighborhood/Community Commercial

Medium Low Density Residential (8.0 DU/AC)

" " " " "

" " " " "

" " " " "

Medium Density Residential (8-16 DU/AC)

Medium High Density Residential (12-25 DU/AC)

High Density Residential (25-50 DU/AC)

Residential Support for the Core Area (30+ DU/AC)

Transit Corridor Residential (30+ DU/AC)

Transit Corridor Residential (25-65 DU/AC)

Transit Corridor Residential (25-65 DU/AC)/General Commercial

Office

Core Area

Industrial Core Area

Combined Industrial/Commercial

Light Industrial

" " " " "

" " " " "

" " " " "

Heavy Industrial

§̈¦8

·|}þ87

STEN

CE

EX

PY

CENTRAL EXPY

EL CAMINO REAL

THE ALAMEDA

SAN

TOM

AS EX

PY

HEDDING ST

MONTAGUE EXPY

LAW

RE

NC

E E

XP

Y

MILPITAS

SAN JOSE SAN JOSE

SAN

TA C

LAR

ASU

NN

YVA

LE

SAN

TA C

LARA SA

N JO

SE

SUNNYVALE

§̈¦880

(/101

·|}þ237

·|}þ87

±0 4,000 8,0002,000

Feet

This map created by Santa Clara County Planning Office. The GIS data was compiledfrom various sources. While deemed reliable, the Planning Office assumes no liability.

4/15/2009 - Y:\Matt\ALUC\projects\SJ\SJC_figure4b_landuse_SC02.mxd

San Jose International Airport

General Plan Land UseCity of Santa Clara

Figure 4b

General Plan Land Use Designations

YYYYYYYYY

Education

((((((((Gateway Thoroughfare

) ) )

) ) )

Community & Regional Shopping

Y Y YY Y YY Y YY Y YMixed Use

Single Family Detached (8 DU/Acre Max)

" " " "

" " " " Single Family Attached (16 DU/Acre Max)

Moderate Density Residential (25 DU/Acre Max)

High Density Residential

Institutional

Industrial Transition

Light Industrial

" " " "

" " " " Heavy Industrial

None

Office/Research & Development

Open Space

XW XW

XW XW XWParks & Recreation

Tourist Commercial

" "

" "

" "

" "

" " Transit-Oriented Mixed Use

X XX X X

X X X

Transit/Station/Airport

MATHEW ST

CLI

FTO

N AV

E

PALM DR

RIO

CT

PAG

E S

T

THEO

DR

2ND ST

BAS

CO

M AV

EJAZZ

CT

COLE PL

LAKESIDE

DR

MO

NR

OE

ST

JILL

AVE

LYLE CT

IRENE ST

FISK

PL

KIEL

Y BL

VD

FAIRWAY GLEN DR

ALTA C

T

POST STTAFT CT

REED ST

KING RD

TRIM

BLE

RD

TAIDA ST

ROSA CT

26TH ST

BETH CT

ALDO AVE

SARA

TOGA

AVE

KOLB

PL

19TH ST

OLGA DR

AUTOMATION PKW

Y

BIKE PATH

MAI

N ST

ALVISO ST

AMETHYST DR

ORI AVE

DE

LA C

RU

Z BLVD

2ND ST

TULIP RD

ON

YX

CT

OLIVE AVE

DUANE AVE

CAPITOL AVE

CIR

O AV

E

MC

CARTHY BLVD

HARRISON ST

REED ST

SC

OTT

BLV

D

CALABAZAS BLVD

CENTRAL EXPY

GREAT MALL PKWY

WOZ WAY

BENTON ST

OAK ST

PATR

ICK

HE

NR

Y D

R

BARBER LN

LEON DR

GIN

GER

LN

TASMAN DR

VIA PISA

PAULA ST

21ST ST

RUTH CT

WACO

ST

SIERRA

RD

FOX LN

EDW

ARD

AVE

SPRING ST

TAYLOR ST

OLIN AVE

ELM ST

PLUM ST

JURY CT

OLSEN DR

GISH RD

DR

AKE

ST

SN

ELL

PL

AGNEW RD

FORD AVE

RUFF DR

COOK ST

MIL

AN D

R

COE AVE

VIC

AR

LN

FUMIA CT

24TH ST

BAH

RF LN

ANNA DR

15TH ST

MORSE ST

AND

REA

PL

OAK

LAN

D R

D

AVIS DR

8TH ST

ALAM

O DR

LICK AVE

UNION ST

HIKI

DO DR

GO

RD

Y D

R

ANZA RD

ZAR

ICK

DR

CER

A D

R

ASH ST

OYAMA DR

CURCI DR

7TH ST

14TH ST

12TH ST

LIS

A LN

COLEMAN AVE

OPA

L D

RCORY AVE

LELONG

ST

FOX AVE

LEO

DR

PARKER ST

KESEY LN

LA

NE F

RIVER STDANA

AVE

23RD

STO

LD IR

ON

SID

ES D

R

KAY DR

MOORPARK AVE

EMORY ST

VINE ST

SUSAN DR

FATJO PL

EWER

T R

D

16TH ST

3RD ST

20TH ST17TH

ST4TH ST

18TH ST

13TH ST

15TH ST

11TH ST

22ND ST

6TH ST

TISCH WAY

LEIG

H AV

E

PARK AVE

VILLA AVE

CATALA

CT

CLARK ST

AU

TUM

N S

T

ZANKER RD

BIRD

AVE

PEDRO ST

BLA

KE AV

E

TRIMBLE RD

SU

NLI

TE D

R

T IM

OTH

Y DR

TOPEKA AVE

WALSH AVE

TASMAN DR

GEO

RGE ST

ARROYO

DR

CUCIZ LN

DANIEL W

AY

9TH ST

7TH ST

5TH ST

DAVI

S ST

5TH

ST

LESTER AVE

GATEWAY PL

DON

AVE

HOOVE

R DR

KOLL CIR

JAY

ST

MAIN ST

VIA

DEL SOL

QU

ME

DR

MARIA

ST

HULL AVE

KIFER RD

BROKAW RD

LAIRD CIR

LINCO

LN ST

WYATT DR

CO

AKLEY D

R

BERING DR

MEAD AVE

ROYAL DR

CECIL AVE

GAR

RET

T DR

BUCKEYE DRCHEENEY

ST

BUTTE ST

OLC

OTT

ST

VICTOR

ST

ELLI

OT

ST

LAFAYETTE ST

CROPLEY AVE

O'TO

OLE

AVE

JULIETTE

LN

MAG

NOLIA

AVE

NORMAN AVE

LUNDY AVE

NE

WH

ALL

ST

BU

CH

AN

AN

DR

10TH ST

FOREST AVE

WO

OD

HAM

S R

D

BERG

ER DR

AVIATION AVE

BRENNAN ST

ORCHAR

D PKW

Y

SPACE PARK DR

REEVE ST

ROSI

TA AV

E

JUNCTION AVE

ROGERS AVE

EASTWOOD CIR

RICHARD AVE

BRAY AVE

CIS

CO

WAY

MONROE ST

PARK AVE

ORTHELLO WAY

AGATE DR SOUTH D

R

AIRPORT BLVDMARTIN AVE

WILLOWLEAF DR

SOUTHWEST EXPY

PAR

AG

ON

DRD

ADO

ST

STARLITE DR

HOPE DR

STEVENS CREEK BLVD

CENTRAL EXPY

HEDDING ST

THE ALAMEDA

1ST ST

MONTAGUE EXPYSA

RAT

OG

A AV

E

EL CAMINO REAL

HEDDING ST

BERRYESSA RD

MONTAGUE EXPY

SAN

TOM

AS

EXPY

1ST ST

SAN CARLOS ST

1ST ST

SantaClara

SanJose

Milpitas

tu101

tu101

·|}þ237

·|}þ87

·|}þ87

·|}þ17

§̈¦880

§̈¦280

§̈¦680

CNEL (dB)Runway

65

70

75

City Limits

Unincorporated_Areas

±0 4,000 8,0002,000Feet

This map created by Santa Clara County Planning Office. The GIS data was compiledfrom various sources. While deemed reliable, the Planning Office assumes no liability.

02/18/2010 - Y:\Matt\ALUC\projects\SJ\SJ_figure5v3_sound.mxd

San Jose International Airport

2022 Aircraft Noise ContoursFigure 5

62

112

112

612

162

612

162

212

212262

239

312262

312

362

362

412

412

562

562

512

512

462

62

462

112

162212

212262312362412

tu101

·|}þ17

·|}þ237

·|}þ87

·|}þ87

§̈¦680§̈¦880

§̈¦280

Maximum Structure Height (feet above MSL)Runway

Ground Level

62

112

162

212

239

262

266

312

362

412

462

512

562

612

±0 4,000 8,0002,000Feet

This map created by Santa Clara County Planning Office. The GIS data was compiledfrom various sources. While deemed reliable, the Planning Office assumes no liability.

12/30/2009 - Y:\Matt\ALUC\projects\SJ\SJ_figure6_part77_v4.mxd

San Jose International Airport

FAR Part 77 SurfacesFigure 6

SAN JOSE

SANTA CLARA

MARTIN AVE

PAR

AG

ON

DR

PALM DR

ALVISO ST

BURTON DR

DADO ST

CHESTNUT ST

MATHEW STLIN

DEN

DR

AIRPORT BLVD

GUADALUPE PKW

Y

COMSTOCK ST

BELLOMY ST

MO

NR

OE

ST

MARKET ST

CABRILLO AVE

LAU

RIE

AVE

JACKSON

ST

MAD

ISON

ST

OAKLAN

D R

D

LAN

E B

REED ST

LAURELWOOD RD

SARA

TOGA

AVE

BURR

ELL CT

CENTRAL EXPY

ALDO AVE

MAIN ST

JEFFERSON

ST

FREMONT ST

VIS

O C

T

FOX LN

DON CT

LEWIS ST

CIVIC CENTER DR

DUANE AVE

RITA

CT

WARBURTON AVE

HARRISON ST

BENTON ST

YOUNGER AVE

JULIAN ST

THE

ALAMEDA

GIS

H RD

CARL

ST

HAIG ST

DAVIS ST

PARK AVE

EDWARD

AVE

SPRING ST

TAYLOR ST

CHAPMAN ST

MORSE ST

RUFF DR

ELM ST

AYER AVE

AVIL

A AV

E

LANE E

MILLER

ST

AZA DR

FINLEY PL

COOK ST

FUMIA CT

IDAH

O ST

BROKA

W RD

BAHR

F LN

ARM

ANIN

I AVE

SC

OTT

BLV

D

FUMIA DR

ASBURY ST

KEITH LN

2ND ST

ANNA DR

ASH ST

MISSION ST

BEL AIR AVE

7TH ST

5TH ST2ND

ST4TH

ST6TH

ST

ROCK AVEAU

TUM

N ST

KINGS ROW

FOX AVE

PARKER ST

MO

NTY

CIRLA

NE F

ALIC

E D

R

RIVER ST

SHERMAN

ST

RYLAND ST

CAR

MEL

WAY

NELO ST

DEVCON DR

BELICK ST

BASSETT ST

EWERT RD

NAGLEE AVE

DAHLIA LOOP

3RD ST

HARDING AVE

SCHIELE AVE

ATMEL WAY

STARDUST CT

CORY AVE

MCKAY DR

KELLER ST

CH

APEL

DR

DOLORES AVE

VILLA AVE

PARK CT

CLYDE

AVE

REMUDA LN

BELLWOOD DR

ISABELLA ST

CHARCOT AVE

MALARIN

AVE

RO

BIN DR

TULIP RD

SU

NLI

T E D

R

MCDANIEL AVE

FRANKLIN ST

COLEMAN AVE

EMORY ST

WALSH AVE

BOXWOOD DR

RUSSELL AVEW

INC

HES

TER

BLVD

METRO DRPLU

MERIA DR

GEO

RG

E ST

ARRO

YO

DR

SKYPORT DR

RAY

MO

ND

ST

KRUSE DR

BRAY AVE

SU

NS

ET

DR

ROYAL DR

CAMPBELL AVE

NEW STREET

DAVIS ST

GATEWAY PL

DON AVE

HESTER AVE

OAKWOOD DR

THOM

AS R

D

TRIMBLE RD

FOX

DR

KOLL CIR

MURGUIA AV

E

JAY

ST

CIRCLE DR

TERMINAL

AVE

RID

DE

R PA

RK

DR

DE LA PENA AVE

STANLEY AVE

ZANKER RD

KERLEY DR

FAIR

FIEL

D AV

E

BROKAW

RD

ANITA

ST

ALF

RED

ST

WYATT DR

LENZEN

AVE

WASH

INGTO

N ST

BE

RING

DR

NEWHALL ST

ROBERT AVE

DE

LA C

RU

Z BLVD

CLAY ST

WO

ODW

ARD AVE

MAGNOLIA AVE

HOMESTEAD RD

BAIR

D AV

E

POPLAR ST

AIRPORT PKW

Y

ORK

NE

Y AV

E

LEIT

H AV

E

VICTOR

ST

O'NEL DR

BER

GER

DR

LAFAY

ETTE ST

TALI

A AV

E

BASSETT ST

AGNEW RD

GRAN

T ST

LEXINGTON ST

O'TO

OLE

AVE

NORMAN AVE

HARTOG DR

10TH ST

PIERCE ST

AVIATION AVE

BRENNAN ST

OR

CH

ARD

PKWY

SPACE PARK DR

REEVE ST

BOHA

NNON DR

ROSI

TA AV

E

JUNCTION

AVE

ROGERS AVE

MEMOREX DR

CAMINO DR

EASTWO

OD

CIR

TERMINAL DR

LINCOLN

ST

RICHARD AVE

HILMAR S

T

ARNOLD

AVE

SAN JUAN

AVE

FORRESTAL

AVE

THE ALAMEDA

1ST ST

1ST ST

HEDDING ST

EL CAMINO REAL

MONTAGUE EXPY

tu101

·|}þ87

§̈¦880

Safety ZonesRunway

Proposed Runway

Runway Protection Zone

Inner Safety Zone

Turning Safety Zone

Outer Safety Zone

Sideline Safety Zone

Traffic Pattern Zone

±0 2,000 4,0001,000Feet

This map created by Santa Clara County Planning Office. The GIS data was compiledfrom various sources. While deemed reliable, the Planning Office assumes no liability.

8/3/2009 - Y:\Matt\ALUC\projects\SJ\SJ_figure7_sz_5.mxd

San Jose International Airport

Airport Safety ZonesFigure 7

SAN JOSESANTA CLARA

HEDDING ST

1ST ST

THE ALAMEDA

1ST ST

HEDDING ST

MONTAGUE EXPY

SAN T OMAS

EXPY

EL CAMINO REAL

£¤101

£¤101·|}þ87

§̈¦880

Safety ZonesRunway

Displaced Threshold

Runway Protection Zone

Inner Safety Zone

Turning Safety Zone

Outer Safety Zone

Sideline Safety Zone

Traffic Pattern Zone

±0 2,000 4,0001,000Feet

This map created by Santa Clara County Planning Office. The GIS data was compiledfrom various sources. While deemed reliable, the Planning Office assumes no liability.

1/27/2010 - Y:\Matt\ALUC\projects\SJ\SJ_figure7_sz_vacant_1.mxd

San Jose International Airport

Airport Safety ZonesFigure 7

SZ Parcels AcInner Safety Zone - South 6 1.47Outer Safety Zone - North 4 9.28Outer Safety Zone - South 12 9.49Runway Protection Zone - North 2 4.14Traffic Pattern Zone - Mid 21 9.23Traffic Pattern Zone - North 22 29.61Traffic Pattern Zone - South 83 17.44Turning Safety Zone - Northeast 3 2.49Turning Safety Zone - Northnorthwest 3 4.93Turning Safety Zone - Northwest 1 0.75Turning Safety Zone - Southeast 3 1.03Turning Safety Zone - Southsouthwest 9 4.84Turning Safety Zone - Southwest 6 1.50

Vacant ParcelsInner Safety Zone - South

Outer Safety Zone - North

Outer Safety Zone - South

Runway Protection Zone - North

Traffic Pattern Zone - North

Traffic Pattern Zone - Mid

Traffic Pattern Zone - South

Turning Safety Zone - Northeast

Turning Safety Zone - Northnorthwest

Turning Safety Zone - Northwest

Turning Safety Zone - Southeast

Turning Safety Zone - Southwest

Turning Safety Zone - Southsouthwest

!5

!5!5

!5!5

!5!5

!5!5

!5!5

!5!5

!5!5

!5

!5!5

!5!5

!5!5

!5

!5

!5!5

!5

!5

!5!5

!5!5

!5

!5

!5

!5

!5

!5

!5!5

!5!5

!5 !5

!5

!5

!5!5

!5

!5

!5

!5

!5

SAN JOSE

SAN JOSE

SANTA CLARA

MILPITAS

1ST ST

1ST ST

SAN

TOM

AS EX

PY

CENTRAL EXPY

SAR

ATO

GA

AVE

STEVENS CREEK BLVD

THE ALAMEDA MARKET ST

BERRYESSA RD

HEDDING ST

HEDDING ST

1ST ST

MONTAGUE EXPY

EL CAMINO REAL

tu101

·|}þ87

·|}þ87

·|}þ237

·|}þ17

·|}þ237

§̈¦680

§̈¦280

§̈¦880

22

23

24

25

2627

28

29

3031

3233

34

35

3637

39

12

41

4243

44 45

46

47

48 49

50

345

678

910

1113

14

1516

17

18

40

19

20

38

21

1

5352

51

2

Airport Influence Area!5 SJ_AIA_intersections

SJC

±0 4,000 8,0002,000Feet

This map created by Santa Clara County Planning Office. The GIS data was compiledfrom various sources. While deemed reliable, the Planning Office assumes no liability.

6/24/2008 - Y:\Matt\ALUC\projects\SJ\SJ_figure8_aia_v3.mxd

San Jose International Airport

Airport Infuence AreaFigure 8

Intersection1 South First St and Floyd St 2 Floyd St and Vine St 3 Vine St and Goodyear St 4 Goodyear St and Locust St 5 Locust St and Willow St 6 Willow St and Palm St 7 Palm St and West Virginia St 8 West Virginia St and Highway 87 9 Highway 87 and Auzerais Ave

10 Auzerias Ave and Delmas Ave 11 Delmas Ave and San Carlos St 12 San Carlos St and Gifford Ave 13 Gifford Ave and West San Fernando St 14 West San Fernando St and Montgomery St 15 Montgomery St and The Alameda 16 The Alameda and Stockton Ave 17 Stockton Ave and Villa St 18 Villa St and Elm St 19 Elm St and Taylor St 20 Taylor St and The Alameda 21 The Alameda and Emory St 22 Emory St and Morse St 23 Morse St and University Ave 24 University Ave and Park Ave 25 Park Ave and McKendrie St 26 McKendrie St and Katherine St 27 Katherine St and Davis St 28 Davis St and Dana St 29 Dana St and Alviso St 30 Alviso St and College Ave 31 College Ave and Washington St 32 Washington St and Homestead 33 Homestead and Monroe St 34 Monroe St and Scott Blvd 35 Scott Blvd and San Tomas Expy 36 San Tomas Expy and Highway 101 37 Highway 101 and San Tomas Aquino Creek 38 San Tomas Aquino Creek and Mission College Blvd 39 Mission College Blvd and Great America Pkwy 40 Great America Pkwy and Patric Henry Dr 41 Patrick Henry Dr and Old Ironsides Dr 42 Old Ironsides Dr and Bunker Hill Lane 43 Bunker Hill Lane and Betsy Ross Dr 44 Betsy Ross Dr and Old Mountain View Alviso Rd 45 Old Mountain View Alviso Rd and San Tomas Aquino Creek46 San Tomas Aquino Creek and Highway 237 47 Highway 237 and Guadalupe River 48 Guadalupe River and Montegue Expy 49 Montegue Expy and Orchard Dr 50 Orchard Dr and Orchard Pkwy 51 Orchard Pkwy and O’Nel Dr 52 O'Nel Dr and Karina Ct 53 Karina Ct and North First St

SANTA CLARASAN JOSE

SAN

TA C

LARASAN

JOSE

MON

TA

GUE EXPY

HEDDING ST

EL CAMINO REAL

ALMA AVE

1ST ST

HEDDING ST

THE ALAMEDA

BERRYESSA RD

SAN CARLOS ST

MONTAGUE EXPY

1ST ST

STEVENS CREEK BLVD

CENTRAL EXPY

SAN

TOM

AS

EXPY

tu101

·|}þ237

·|}þ87

·|}þ87

·|}þ17

§̈¦280

§̈¦680

§̈¦880

§̈¦880

AIRPORTSJC

CNEL (dBs)657075

±0 4,000 8,0002,000Feet

This map created by Santa Clara County Planning Office. The GIS data was compiledfrom various sources. While deemed reliable, the Planning Office assumes no liability.

8/18/2010 - Y:\Matt\ALUC\projects\SJC\SJC_sound_landuse_01.mxd

San Jose International Airport

Landuse and Noise

Santa Clara LanduseYYYYYY

Education

( (( (( (

Gateway Thoroughfare

) ) )

) ) ) Community & Regional Shopping

Y Y YY Y YY Y YMixed Use

Single Family Detached (8 DU/Acre Max)

" " " " Single Family Attached (16 DU/Acre Max)

Moderate Density Residential (25 DU/Acre Max)

High Density Residential

Institutional

Industrial Transition

Light Industrial

" " "

" " " Heavy Industrial

None

Office/Research & Development

Open Space

XW XW

XW XW XW

XW XW XWParks & Recreation

Tourist Commercial

" "

" "" "

" "Transit-Oriented Mixed Use

X X

X X XTransit/Station/Airport

San Jose Landuse" " " Industrial Park

Industrial Park/General Commercial

Industrial Park/Preferred Hotel Site

No Underlying Designation

XW XWPublic Park and Open Space

XW XWXW XW

XWXW Public/Quasi-Public

General Commercial

) ) Neighborhood/Community Commercial

Medium Low Density Residential (8.0 DU/AC)

" " " Medium Density Residential (8-16 DU/AC)

Medium High Density Residential (12-25 DU/AC)

High Density Residential (25-50 DU/AC)

Residential Support for the Core Area (25+ DU/AC)

Transit Corridor Residential (20+ DU/AC)

Transit Corridor Residential (25-65 DU/AC)

Transit Corridor Residential (25-65 DU/AC)/General Commercial

Office

Core Area

Industrial Core Area

Combined Industrial/Commercial

Light Industrial

" " "

" " "

Heavy Industrial

TABLE 1

General Plan Designation

Total Acreage Affected Existing CLUP Policies Proposed CLUP Policies Discussion

Potential for Displacement

Combined Industrial/Commercial

463.51

Commercial: Caution, Review Noise Insulation needs carefully. Industrial:

Satisfactory.

Commercial: Conditionally Acceptable. Industrial: Generally Acceptable

Policies regarding Commercial and Industrial Development do not substantially change with

adoption of new CLUP. Uses are either acceptable (Industrial) or require evaluation for noise insulation

(Commercial)

None

Public Parks and Open Space

253.71Public Parks: Caution, Review

Noise Insulation needs carefully.

Public Parks: Generally Unacceptable. New Construction or development should

be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed

analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the

design. Outdoor activities are likely to be adversely affected.

Existing CLUP Noise Policies for this zone require noise insulation. The new CLUP discourages parks within the 65 CNEL contour, requiring noise analysis and insluation, acknwoledging outddor activiteis will

be adversely impacted. While the new CLUP has stronger language discouraging neighborhood parks,

both Land Use Plans acknowledge noise impacts within this zone. In

summary, while neighborhood parks and playgrounds are strongly discouraged under the new CLUP, the acknowledgement of noise impacts has

not substantially changed.

Low

Public/Quasi-Public 254.3Avoid Land Use Unless related

to Airport ServiceUnacceptable. New Construction or

development shall not be undertaken.

Under both existing and proposed CLUP policies, land uses within this Genral Plan designation are not

allowedNone

Residential 395.94Avoid Land Use Unless related

to Airport Serviced

Generally Unacceptable. New construction or development should be discouraged. If

new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise

reduction requirements must be made and needed noise attenuation features included in the design. Outdoor activities are likely

to be adversely affected.

Under the existing CLUP, Residential uses are not allowed. Under the new CLUP, residential uses are discouraged however could be allowed with noise

analysis and attenuation.

None

Education 6.09Avoid Land Use Unless related

to Airport ServiceUnacceptable. New Construction or

development shall not be undertaken.

Educational uses cannot be esablished in the existing CLUP and cannot be established in the

proposed CLUP.None

65 dBA CNEL Coutour - Displacemnt Analysis

Downtown Core 112.62

Commercial: Caution, Review Noise Insulation Carefully.

Residential: Avoid Land Use Unless related to Airport

Service

Commercial: Generally Acceptable. Residential: Generally Unacceptable.

The Downtown Core General Plan Designation allows several types of land uses. Noise policies

affecting typical uses within this zone (Commercial, Residential) are less stringent under the proposed

CLUP.

None

70 dBA CNEL Coutour - Displacemnt AnalysisLand use Total Acreage Existing CLUP Proposed CLUP Narrative

Potential for Displacement

Light Industrial 194.38Caution, Review noise

insulation needs carefully

Generally Unacceptable. New construction or development should be discouraged. If

new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise

reduction requirements must be made and needed noise attenuation features included in the design. Outdoor activities are likely

to be adversely affected.

Both the Existing CLUP and the Proposed CLUP requrie a review of noise insulation for industrial uses witin this zone. Although the new CLUP

policies are more specific in discouragiing Industrial uses, they could stil be allowed with noie insulation

features incorporated into the design.

Low

Heavy Industrial 129.66Caution, Review noise

insulation needs carefully

Generally Unacceptable. New construction or development should be discouraged. If

new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise

reduction requirements must be made and needed noise attenuation features included in the design. Outdoor activities are likely

to be adversely affected.

Both the Existing CLUP and the Proposed CLUP requrie a review of noise insulation for industrial uses witin this zone. Although the new CLUP

policies are more specific in discouragiing Industrial uses, they could stil be allowed with noie insulation

features incorporated into the design.

Low

Combined Industrial/Commercial

49.68Industrial / Commercial:

Caution, Review noise insulation needs carefully

Industirial /Most Commercial: Generally Unacceptable. Transient lodging:

Unacceptable.

Both the Existing CLUP and the Proposed CLUP requrie a review of noise insulation for industrial and most commercial uses witin this zone. Although the

new CLUP policies are more specific in discouragiing these uses, they could stil be allowed with noise insulation features incorporated into the design.

Some types of uses within the Commercial Zone, such as Transiet lodging and Auditoriums would not

be allowed.

Certain Uses (Lodging): Yes

Other Uses: Low

Public Parks and Open Space

136.28Caution, Review noise

insulation needs carefully

Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks: Unacceptable. New Construction or

development shall not be undertaken. Golf courses, riding stables, water

recreation, cemeteries: Conditionally Acceptable.

Policies preventing neighborhood recreation uses (neighborhood parks, playgrouds) are much stronger under the proposed CLUP. However other recreation related uses such as golf courses, stables, and open

space are deemed "Conditionally Acceptable". Portions of land within this Parks designation are within Guadalupe Creek and thus not subject to

development. Majority of lands are in Guadalupe Gardens and were partially acquired with intent to

serve as buffer zone for the Airport. Application of the new CLUP noise policies could partially desplace

certain new recreational uses, such as neighborhood parks and playgrounds.

Partial

Public/Quasi-Public 209.82Avoid Land Use unless related

to airport serviceUnacceptable. New Construction or

development shall not be undertaken.

Under both existing and proposed CLUP policies, land uses within this Genral Plan designation are not

allowedNone

Residential 29.69Avoid Land Use unless related

to airport service

Generally Unacceptable. New construction or development should be discouraged. If

new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise

reduction requirements must be made and needed noise attenuation features included

in the des

Under both existing and proposed CLUP policies, Residenail uses within this Genral Plan designation

are not allowedNone

75 dBA CNEL Coutour - Displacement Analysis

Land use Total Acreage Existing CLUP Proposed CLUP NarrativePotential for

Displacement

Light Industrial 4.39Caution, Review noise

insulation needs carefully

Generally Unacceptable. New construction or development should be discouraged. If

new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise

reduction requirements must be made and needed noise attenuation features included in the design. Outdoor activities are likely

to be adversely affected.

Both the Existing CLUP and the Proposed CLUP requrie a review of noise insulation for industrial uses witin this zone. Although the new CLUP

policies are more specific in discouragiing Industrial uses, they could stil be allowed with noise insulation

features incorporated into the design.

Low

Heavy Industrial 0.11Caution, Review noise

insulation needs carefully

Generally Unacceptable. New construction or development should be discouraged. If

new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise

reduction requirements must be made and needed noise attenuation features included in the design. Outdoor activities are likely

to be adversely affected.

Both the Existing CLUP and the Proposed CLUP requrie a review of noise insulation for industrial uses witin this zone. Although the new CLUP

policies are more specific in discouragiing Industrial uses, they could stil be allowed with noise insulation

features incorporated into the design.

Low

Combined Industrial/Commercial

82.35

Industrial: Caution, Review noise insulation needs carefully. Commercial: Avoid Land Use

unless related to airport service

Industrial: Generally Unacceptable. Commercial: Unacceptable. New

Construction or development shall not be undertaken.

Policies regarding Insustrial Uses are discussed above under Heavy and Light Industrial.

Commercial development cannot be established in the both the existing and proposed CLUP.

Industrial: Low Commercial:

None

Public Parks and Open Space

11.36Avoid Land Use unless related

to airport serviceUnacceptable. New Construction or

development shall not be undertaken.New Public Parks cannot be established in the

existing and proposed CLUP.None

Public/Quasi-Public 547.61Avoid Land Use unless related

to airport serviceUnacceptable. New Construction or

development shall not be undertaken.The acreage within the 75 CNEL noise contour is all

Airport property.None

TABLE 2

CLUP Safety Zones - Displacement Analysis

Safety ZoneGeneral Plan Designation

Existing CLUP Policies

Proposed SJC CLUP Policies

Acreage Affected Narrative

Potential For Displacement

Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) (Equal to the area of the Inner Safety Zone in the existing CLUP)

100% No Structures Allowed

100% No People Allowed

No development allowed in both the currentand proposed CLUP. none

Public Park and Open Space

Allowed subject to the 10/25 rule limitation*

Allowed with a maximum of 120

people per acre and 30 percent of gross acreage open. No

structures within 100 feet of the runway

145

Safety Policies regarding population density under the new CLUP are not more stringent than the existing CLUP.

none

Public / Quasi Public

Allowed subject to the 10/25 rule limitation*

Allowed with a maximum of 120

people per acre and 30 percent of gross acreage open. No

structures within 100 feet of the runway

71.25

Most of the 71.25 acres is owned by the Airport in close proximity to the runways. Safety Policies regarding populaiton density under the new CLUP are not more stringent than the existing CLUP.

none

Inner Safety Zone (ISZ) (Equal to the area of the Outer Safety Zone in the existing CLUP)

Light IndustrialAllowed subject to the 10/25 rule limitation*

Allowed with a maximum of 120

people per acre and 30 percent of gross acreage open. No

structures within 100 feet of the runway

165.85

Safety Policies regarding population density under the new CLUP are not more stringent than the existing CLUP.

none

Heavy IndustrialAllowed subject to the 10/25 rule limitation*

Allowed with a maximum of 120

people per acre and 30 percent of gross acreage open. No

structures within 100 feet of the runway

42.74

Safety Policies regarding population density under the new CLUP are not more stringent than the existing CLUP.

none

Combined Industrial / Commercial

Allowed on a small scale

subject to the 10/25 rule limitation*

Offices would have to be

constructed to widely

distribute employees and avoid a grouple

of people concentrated

together

Allowed with a maximum of 120

people per acre and 30 percent of gross acreage open. No

structures within 100 feet of the runway.

No shopping centers, restaurants, theaters, stadiums, multi-story

office buildings, educational facilities,

daycare facilities, nursing homes and

hospitals are allowed.

36.75

Some commercial uses (shopping centers, restaurants, etc,) would not be allowed. However, other industrial and commercial uses could be established within the 120 people per acre cap.

Partial

Residential Not allowed Not allowed 9.71No residential development is allowed under the existing and the proposed CLUP.

none

* The 10/25 requires that no more than 10 persons on an annual average and no more than 25 people at any one time on each net acre.

Inner Safety Zone (ISZ) (Equal to the area of the Outer Safety Zone in the existing CLUP)

Safety Zone

General Plan Land Use

Designation Existing CLUP Proposed CLUP Acreage DiscussionPotential for Displacement

Public Parks and Open Space N/A

Non-residential, maximum 200 people

per acre, with 20 percent open space

and minimumum dimensions of 300

feet by 75 feet parallel to the

runways

29.40

Public Parks are allowed within this safety zone subject to meeting

the density and open space requirements.

none

Public/Quasi-Public N/A

Non-residential, maximum 200 people

per acre, with 20 percent open space

and minimumum dimensions of 300

feet by 75 feet parallel to the

runways

68.50

Public Uses are allowed in this safety zone, subject to meeting

the density and open space requirement.

none

Light Industrial N/A

Non-residential, maximum 200 people

per acre, with 20 percent open space

and minimumum dimensions of 300

feet by 75 feet parallel to the

runways

148.73

Industrial uses are allowed in this safety zone, subject to meeting

the density and open space requirement.

None

Turning Safety

Zone(TPZ)

Heavy Industrial N/A

Non-residential, maximum 200 people

per acre, with 20 percent open space

and minimumum dimensions of 300

feet by 75 feet parallel to the

runways

122.13

Industrial uses are allowed in this safety zone, subject to meeting

the density and open space requirement.

None

Industrial Park N/A

Non-residential, maximum 200 people

per acre, with 20 percent open space

and minimumum dimensions of 300

feet by 75 feet parallel to the

runways

9.62

Industrial uses are allowed in this safety zone, subject to meeting

the density and open space requirement.

None

Combined Industrial/ Commercial

N/A

Non-residential, maximum 200 people

per acre, with 20 percent open space

and minimumum dimensions of 300

feet by 75 feet parallel to the

runways. No regional shopping centers,

theaters, gas stations or similar activites.

64.16

Some commercial uses (shopping centers, gas stations, etc,) would not be allowed. However, other industrial and commercial uses could be established within the safety zone subject to meeting

the density and open space requirements.

Partial

Turning Safety

Zone(TPZ)

Single Family ResidentialN/A

Nonresidential. Maximum 200 people

per acre. If non-residential uses are not feasible, allow residential infill to existing density.

18.51

Affected areas consist of existing single family development (8 du/acre) . The proposed CLUP

policies allow for residential infill development on parcels less than

a quarter acre in size.

None

High Density Residential N/A

Nonresidential. Maximum 200 people

per acre. If non-residential uses are not feasible, allow residential infill to existing density

6.40

Although lands with this General Plan designation are currently developed. Redevelopment of

these areas would be prohibited under the new CLUP

Yes

Education N/A

Non-residential, maximum 200 people

per acre, with 20 percent open space

and minimumum dimensions of 300

feet by 75 feet parallel to the

runways No schools or day care centers

allowed.

3.42

Schools would not be allowed in this safety zone. Althouh only a

portion of this General Plan designation is witin this safety zone, the new CLUP policies

would not allow new development or redevelopment.

Yes

Office N/A

Non-residential, maximum 200 people

per acre, with 20 percent open space

and minimumum dimensions of 300

feet by 75 feet parallel to the

runways

10.8

Office uses are allowed in the proposed CLUP, subject to

meeting the density and open space requirements.

None

Safety ZoneGeneral Plan

Land Use Existing CLUP Proposed CLUP Acreage Narrative Displacement

Turning Safety

Zone(TPZ)

Public Parks and Open Space N/A

Nonresidential, Maximum of 300

people per acre with 20% of the gross

area open

51.62 Parks are allowed subject to meeting the density requirements. None

Public/Quasi-Public N/A

Nonresidential, Maximum of 300

people per acre with 20% of the gross

area open

22

Public / Quasi Public uses are allowed in the proposed CLUP, subject to meeting the density and open space requirements.

None

Light Industrial N/A

Nonresidential, Maximum of 300

people per acre with 20% of the gross

area open

40.05

Industrial uses are allowed in this safety zone, subject to meeting

the density and open space requirement.

None

Heavy Industrial N/A

Nonresidential, Maximum of 300

people per acre with 20% of the gross

area open

50.17

Industrial uses are allowed in this safety zone, subject to meeting

the density and open space requirement.

None

Combined Industrial/ Commercial

N/A

Nonresidential, Maximum of 300

people per acre with 20% of the gross

area open. No Regional Shopping

Centers, theaters, or meeting halls.

95.10

Some Commercial uses such as regional shopping centers and theaters are not allowed within this safety zone,however other industrial and commercial uses

could be developed subject to the density and open space

requirements.

Partial

Single Family Residential N/A

Nonresidential, Maximum of 300

people per acre with 20% of the gross

area open. Residential - if non-residential

uses are not feasible, allow residential infill to existing density

52

Affected areas consist of existing single family development (8 du/acre) . The proposed CLUP policies allow for residential infill development on parcels less than a quarter acre in size.

None

Outer Safety Zone(OSZ)

Medium Density ResidentialN/A

Nonresidential, Maximum of 300

people per acre with 20% of the gross

area open. Residential - if non-residential

uses are not feasible, allow residential infill to existing density

13

Although lands with this General Plan designation are currently

developed (type of development unknown), Redevelopment of

these areas would be prohibited under the new CLUP

Yes

Downtown Core N/A

Nonresidential, Maximum of 300

people per acre with 20% of the gross

area open

6.36

This General Plan designation is intended for high density

commercial and residential development. Under the new

CLUP policies, population density is limited to 300 persons per acres and certain uses (new

residential) are not allowed. As such, development could occur in this zone, abet at lower densities than perscribed under the General

Plan

Partial

Office Research and Development

N/A

Nonresidential, Maximum of 300

people per acre with 20% of the gross

area open

5.98

Although large-scale Office R&D development would be

inconsistent with the proposed CLUP, smaller scale Office R&D development could occur within

this safety zone per the population density requriements.

None

Safety ZoneGeneral Plan

Land Use Existing CLUP Proposed CLUP Acreage Narrative Displacement

Public/Quasi-Public N/A

Nonresidential, Maximum of 300

people per acre with 30% of the gross

area open

125.46 All the land located within this safety zone is on Airport property. None

Outer Safety Zone(OSZ)

Sideline Safety

Zone(SSZ)

Combined Industrial/ Commercial

N/A

Nonresidential, Maximum of 300

people per acre with 30% of the gross

area open

,21 acres

Combined Industrial / Commercial uses could be allowed subject to meeting the density and open space requirements within this

zone.

None

Traffic Pattern Zone Numerous N/A

No Limit on population density

and 10 percent of the gross area every half

mile must remain open. No sports

stadiums or similar uses with very high concentrations of

people.

Numerous

The only uses with very high concentrations of people would not be allowed within this zone. All other types of development

could occur.

Very limited

Sideline Safety

Zone(SSZ)