slick tabash

Upload: valentinsb

Post on 08-Apr-2018

249 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    1/22

    Existe Dios?Existe Dios?

    Debate: Matt SlickDebate: Matt Slickvsvs

    EddieEddie TabashTabash

    www.carm.orgwww.carm.org

    Copyright Matt SlickCopyright Matt Slick

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    2/22

    Dos Tipos de InfinitosDos Tipos de Infinitos

    Infinito Real

    e

    Infinito Potencial

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    3/22

    Infinito RealInfinito Real Un

    Inf

    in

    ito Real es un

    a totalidad atemporal quen

    oaumenta ni disminuye con el numero de miembros quecontiene.

    Ejemplo: El numero de puntos de una linea es un infinito real; noexiste unnumero exacto, numero finito.

    Problemas con los infinitos reales:

    Consideremos una larga linea de de dominos en el universo. Sisacamos la mitad de esa linea, aun tendremos unnumero infinito.Pero, la mitad del infinito original contiene el mismo numero dedominos que el infinito original. Esto significara que la mitad de latotalidad es igual a la totalidad. Esto no puede ser.

    Un reloj infinitamente viejo. El horario hace un recorido del reloj 2veces al dia. El minutero 24 veces por dia. Pero, una cantidadinfinita de tiempo resulta en que tanto el munitero como el horariohan tenido unnumero de rotaciones iguales aunque el minuterotiene 12 veces mas rotaciones que el horario. Esto no puede ser.

    Por lo tanto los infinitos reales no existen.

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    4/22

    Cada adicion resulta en un set finito mas largo. Un

    infinito potencial se compone de una cantidad finita

    que incrementa su numero en el tiempo al agregar

    miembros. Ejemplo: Al dividir una linea a la mitad, y luego a la mitad,

    y a la mitad nuevamente resulta en una cantidad finita de

    divisiones. Es posible continuar haciendo esto, aunque en

    cada division

    , un

    n

    umerofin

    ito de division

    es aun

    exista.

    Infinito PotencialInfinito Potencial

    1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2

    1/2

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    5/22

    No es posible atravesar un infinitoNo es posible atravesar un infinito

    real, 1real, 1 Imaginemos una linea de dominos infinita y

    atemporal.

    Al atravesar por la linea de dominos, para llegar a

    cualquier domino en particular es necesarioatravesar unnumero infinito de ellos para llegar a

    cualquier domino.

    Pero unnumero infinito de dominos no

    pueden ser atravesados, de otra forma

    no sera infinito. Es asi, que no podemos

    tener un infinito real de dominos.

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    6/22

    No podemos cruzar un Infinito Real, 2No podemos cruzar un Infinito Real, 2

    De igual manera, si cada domino representa un segundoy cada domino cayese uno tras otro, representando

    sucesivos momentos en el tiempo, la linea de dominos

    no podra ser infinita desde el pasado porque

    No podra haber existido un primer domino

    cayendo. Si no hay primero, no puede haber

    segundo, ni tercero, ni los siguientes.

    Por lo tan

    to, un

    inf

    in

    ito real(unnumero infinito y atemporal)

    de sucesivos eventos en el

    pasado es imposible.

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    7/22

    Summary Regarding ActualSummary Regarding Actual

    InfiniteInfinite An actual infinite ofsuccessive events in the past is

    logically impossible because

    It would require traversing an infinite number

    ofevents which cannot be done.

    There would be no first event. Ifthere is

    no first event, there cannot be a second, or a third,

    and no following series ofevents.

    Therefore, there must be a

    beginning ofevents.

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    8/22

    Cosmological Argument for GodsCosmological Argument for Gods

    ExistenceExistence The universe exists

    There are only two optionsavailable to account for theUniverse: It had a beginning or

    it did not have a beginning. Ifthe universe had no beginning,

    then it is either Eternally Static orEternally non-Static (Oscillating)

    Ifthe universe had a beginning, then something brought

    the universe into existence. There are only two options available to account for the

    cause ofthe existence ofthe universe

    First Option: Impersonal Cause ofthe universe

    Second Option: Personal Cause ofthe universe.

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    9/22

    Only two options available toOnly two options available to

    account for the Universeaccount for the Universe

    The Universe had a beginning

    or it had no beginning.

    Beginning and no beginning is

    an antonymic pair.

    Antonyms are opposites. Beginning and no

    beginning means there is no third option.Therefore, it is not a false dichotomy since no other

    options are possible.

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    10/22

    If the universe had no beginning,If the universe had no beginning,

    then it is either Eternally Static orthen it is either Eternally Static or

    Eternally nonEternally non--Static (Oscillating)Static (Oscillating)

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    11/22

    Eternally Static Universe: TheEternally Static Universe: The

    universe has always existed.universe has always existed. This does not agree with Cosmic Microwave

    Background Radiation (CMBR) which shows the

    universe had a beginning.

    The universe always existing would be impossible

    since it would mean the universe had an infinite

    number ofsuccessive events (atoms moving, stars

    forming, etc.), before we got to now. But this is

    impossible as we have seen above.

    Conclusion: The universe is not infinitely old. It had a

    beginning.

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    12/22

    Eternally non Static,Eternally non Static,

    or Oscillating Universeor Oscillating Universe The universe forms, collapses, forms, collapses, forever

    This does not agree with the 2nd law ofthermodynamics. The

    universe, as a whole, is a closed system. There is no known

    mechanism for a 100% efficient exchange ofenergy information and reformation.

    An eternally oscillating universe would require an infinite

    number ofoscillations but this is impossible since it would

    mean

    the un

    iverse had an

    inf

    in

    iten

    umber of

    successiveevents.

    Conclusion: The universe had a beginning and could not have

    been eternally oscillating.

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    13/22

    If the universe had a beginning,If the universe had a beginning,

    then something brought thethen something brought the

    universe into existence.universe into existence.

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    14/22

    There are only two options toThere are only two options to

    account for the cause of theaccount for the cause of theexistence of the universe:existence of the universe:

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    15/22

    FirstFirstOptionOption: ImpersonalImpersonal CauseCause ofof

    thethe UniverseUniverse

    Only two possible options

    First Option: The universe brought itselfinto existence

    Second Option: The universe was caused

    to exist

    (Either it caused itself to exist or was caused to exist)

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    16/22

    Impersonal Cause, First option: theImpersonal Cause, First option: the

    universe brought itself into existenceuniverse brought itself into existence

    This is not possible because in order for an

    action to occur, something has to cause the

    action

    . A cause is itself

    an

    action

    . An

    action

    results from something that exists prior to it.

    But ifsomething has no existence (nothing),

    then it has no prior existence, no properties, no

    abilities, and cannot perform any actions.Therefore, nothing comes from

    nothing and the universe did not

    bring itself into existence.

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    17/22

    Impersonal Cause, Second option:Impersonal Cause, Second option:

    The universe was caused to exist byThe universe was caused to exist by

    an impersonal means.an impersonal means. Whatever caused the universe to exist,

    existed prior to the universe.

    This existence was ontologically prior (essence/nature),not temporally prior to the universe.

    In Mr. Tabashs debate with Phil Fernandez he said at 54:44, We

    cant even speak of a cause [of the universe] because there was no time

    and space for sequential causation to play out before the big bangoccurred.

    Two things to note here:

    Mr. Tabash denies temporality before the universe.

    Mr. Tabash, by his own admission, cannot offer us a cause of

    the universe.

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    18/22

    An impersonal, ontologically priorAn impersonal, ontologically prior

    cause either existed in a timeless andcause either existed in a timeless and

    changeless state or it did not.changeless state or it did not.

    Quentin Smith (an atheist), Professor ofPhilosophy who

    is listed under Suggested Links on Eddie Tabashs site

    (tabash.com) said, that the cause ofspacetime existstimelessly.

    Timeless, Changeless state: An impersonal, ontologically

    prior cause existing in a timeless and changeless state

    cannot perform an action since it cant suddenly decideto do anything. It just is.

    Conclusion: an impersonal, timeless, ontological prior

    cause could not have brought the universe into existence.

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    19/22

    NonNon--Timeless, Changing StateTimeless, Changing State

    Ifthe impersonal, ontologically prior cause existed innon-

    timeless and non-changeless state then whatever caused it to

    change is a prior cause which would be a cause external to

    itself.

    We then must ask what caused that prior cause, and the causebefore that, etc. This would mean that no matter how far back

    we go, we would never find the first event. With no first event,

    there can be no second, no third, etc., and nothing would ever

    happen.

    Remember: an infinite regression ofprior causes would mean

    there is an infinite regression ofuncaused causes which would

    have to be traversed before we found the cause ofthe

    universe, but this is impossible since an actual infinite of

    successive events in the past is logically impossible.

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    20/22

    Conclusion regarding anConclusion regarding an

    Impersonal Cause of the UniverseImpersonal Cause of the Universe Neither the Impersonal-Timeless-Changeless-State or

    the Impersonal-Non-Timeless-Non-Changeless-State

    can account for the beginning ofthe universe.

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    21/22

    Two options

    When we have only two options to account for

    something (impersonal and personal) and one of

    them is negated, then by default the other is

    validated. Since the Impersonal Cause cannotaccount for the beginning ofthe universe, the

    only option left is the Personal Cause.

    That Personal Cause is God.

    IMPERSONAL

    CAUSE

    PERSONAL

    CAUSE

  • 8/6/2019 Slick Tabash

    22/22

    Second Option:

    Personal Cause ofthe Universe

    There are only two options to account for a Personal

    Being to Act to create the universe: External and

    Internal Cause.

    An External Cause would only brings the issue ofcausation back to its prior cause, and its cause, for

    infinity, which cannot happen since we cannot have an

    infinite regression ofcauses.

    AnInternal Cause in a Personal Being would be self

    determined, a Decision to Act.

    Therefore, the Personal Cause ofthe Universe made a

    decision to act and created the universe.