slides for class #7 asu technology standards seminar march 8, 2010 brad biddle
DESCRIPTION
Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle. Introduction. Taxonomy / “How”. Business strategy / “Why”. Antitrust. Student presentations Guest discussion re USB. IPR: RAND v. RF. IPR(+): “Openness”. IPR: Patent pools. Policy: private stnds & law. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Slides for Class #7
ASU Technology Standards Seminar
March 8, 2010
Brad Biddle
![Page 2: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Introduction
Taxonom
y / “How
”
Business strategy / “W
hy”
Antitrust
IPR
: RA
ND
v. RF
IPR
(+): “O
penness”
IPR
: Patent pools
Policy: private stnds &
law
Policy: R
ole of governm
ent
Case study: C
hina
Student presentations
Student presentations
*S
tudent presentationsG
uest discussion re US
B3/22 3/29 4/5 4/12 4/19 4/26
![Page 3: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Everyone loves “open standards”!
![Page 4: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
![Page 5: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
… but we can’t agree what they are
![Page 6: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
ITU
http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/othergroups/ipr-adhoc/openstandards.html
![Page 7: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
. . .
ANSI
http://publicaa.ansi.org/sites/apdl/Documents/Standards%20Activities/Critical%20Issues/Open%20Standards/CIP-OpenStandards.doc
![Page 8: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/21/05/T21050000050010MSWE.doc
![Page 9: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Tsilas
http://www.ijclp.net/files/ijclp_web-doc_8-10-2005.pdf
![Page 10: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10Krechmer
http://www.csrstds.com/openstds.pdf
![Page 11: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=19529
![Page 12: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12Perens
http://perens.com/OpenStandards/Definition.html
![Page 13: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Rosenhttp://www.rosenlaw.com/DefiningOpenStandards.pdf
![Page 14: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Ghoshhttp://www.intgovforum.org/Substantive_1st_IGF/openstandards-IGF.pdf
![Page 15: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
DeNardis (“maximal openness” definition)
http://www.ijclp.net/files/ijclp_web-doc_9-13-2009.pdf
![Page 16: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Maximal openness
Closed: a specification developed by a single company with no avenue for participation by other parties. The spec is unavailable for other parties to use, even for a fee, to develop interoperable products based on the specification. The spec developer owns all the IPR and does not license it under any terms.
DeNardis http://www.ijclp.net/files/ijclp_web-doc_9-13-2009.pdf
![Page 17: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
![Page 18: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
‘Conservative’ views: procedural due process,
RAND IPR
Open source-centric views: open
participation, RF IPR
‘A2K-centric’ views: non-traditional innovation
arguments, political and economic emphasis
![Page 19: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Standards Setting Organizations (SSOs)
Formal, recognized standards development orgs (SDOs)
Consortia (sometimes “SIGs”)
“A collaboration of stakeholders with the common goal of the
standardization of a specific technology or application”
International“Big I” or “FISDOs”: ITU, ISO, IEC, JTC1
[“Little I”: e.g. ASTM, IEEE]Special Interest Groups (SIGs)
“focus on a single standard for a specific technology or
industry”
“[usually] limited to development and possibly
promotion”
“generally short-lived”
Alliances“develop multiple related
standards for a technology”
“may offer… logo and certification programs,
marketing…”
“life cycle may be relatively long”
Regionale.g. ETSI, COPANT
NationalCoordination bodies: e.g. CESI,
ANSIAccredited SSOs: e.g. TIA,
INCITS, NEMA, SAE
-Based on taxonomy described in IPO Standards Primer (Sept. 2009)
Develop “Specifications” Develop “Standards”
GENERALLY RAND, PROCEDURALLY ‘OPEN’
MIXED RAND/RF; MIXED PROCEDURAL OPENNESS
![Page 20: Slides for Class #7 ASU Technology Standards Seminar March 8, 2010 Brad Biddle](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56814b8b550346895db8717c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Maximal openness
Closed
Exercise: where do some of these familiar SIGs/SDOs fall on DeNardis’ scale?