slug-tests in pp- and pvp-holes at olkiluoto in 2004 · jere lahdenperä december 2005 working...

96
POSIVA OY FI-27160 OLKILUOTO, FINLAND Tel +358-2-8372 31 Fax +358-2-8372 3709 Eveliina Tammisto Pirjo Hellä Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004

Upload: others

Post on 08-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

P O S I V A O Y

FI -27160 OLKILUOTO, F INLAND

Tel +358-2-8372 31

Fax +358-2-8372 3709

Eve l i i na Tammis to

P i r j o He l l ä

Jere Lahdenperä

December 2005

Work ing Repor t 2005 -76

Slug-Testsin PP- and PVP-Holesat Olkiluoto in 2004

Page 2: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

December 2005

Base maps: ©National Land Survey, permission 41/MYY/05

Working Reports contain information on work in progress

or pending completion.

Eve l i i na Tammisto

P i r j o He l l ä

JP-F in tac t Oy

Jere Lahdenperä

Pos iva Oy

Work ing Report 2005 -76

Slug-Testsin PP- and PVP-Holesat Olkiluoto in 2004

Page 3: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base
Page 4: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

Tammisto, E., Hellä, P. & Lahdenperä, J. 2004. Slug-tests in PP- and PVP-holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. Eurajoki: Posiva Oy. 87 p. Working Report 2005-76.

ABSTRACT

As part of the program for the final disposal of the nuclear fuel waste, Posiva Oy investigates the hydrological conditions at the Olkiluoto island. The hydraulic conductivity in the shallow holes PP2, PP38 and PP39 were measured in July 2004 and PVP4A, PVP4B and PVP14 in June 2004, PVP11, PVP12 and PVP13 in December 2004 and PVP2 in January 2005. The length of PP-holes varies between 13 and 24 m and the measured sections (1 m) are located in the bedrock. PVP-holes have a length up to 10 m and the measured sections (2 m) are located in the overburden.

The measurements were conducted using the slug-test technique. In the slug-test the hydraulic head in the borehole is abruptly changed either by pouring water in the borehole or by lowering the pressure sensor. The conductivity is interpreted based on the recovery of the water level. This report presents the field measurements and their interpretation. The interpretation has been done using the Hvorslev’s method, but for the control also Thiem’s equation was applied.

According to the results hydraulic conductivities in PP-holes range from 10-9 m/s to 10-4 m/s and in PVP-holes from 10-6 m/s to 10-4 m/s. The range is almost the same as in measurements of year 2002. Also the results from holes measured both 2002 and 2004 are very close to each other. The results agree also with hydraulic conductivity information available from the pre-pumping done in connection of the groundwater sampling.

Keywords: Hydraulic conductivity, slug-test, disposal of spent nuclear fuel, hydrology

Page 5: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base
Page 6: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

Tammisto, E., Hellä, P. & Lahdenperä, J. 2004. Vedenjohtavuusmittaukset PP- ja PVP-rei’issä Olkiluodossa 2004. Eurajoki: Posiva Oy. 87 s. Työraportti 2005-76.

TIIVISTELMÄ

Osana ydinjätteen loppusijoitustutkimusta Posiva Oy selvittää Olkiluodon saaren hydrologisia olosuhteita. Matalien reikien vedenjohtavuuksia mitattiin rei’istä PP2, PP38 ja PP39 heinäkuussa 2004, PVP4A, PVP4B ja PVP14 kesäkuussa 2004, PVP11, PVP12 ja PVP13 joulukuussa 2004 ja PVP2 tammikuussa 2005. PP-reikien syvyys vaihtelee välillä 13 - 24 m maanpinnasta, ja mittausjaksot (1 m) sijaitsevat kallion yläosassa. Syvimmät PVP-reiät ovat 10 m, ja mittausvälit (2 m) ovat maapeiteosuudella.

Mittaukset suoritettiin käyttäen slug-tekniikkaa. Mittauksessa kairanreikään saadaan ylipaine joko kaatamalla sinne vettä tai laskemalla paineanturia. Vedenjohtavuus lasketaan vedenpinnan palautumisajan perusteella. Tässä raportissa kuvataan kenttämittaukset ja niiden tulkinta. Mittaukset on tulkittu käyttäen Hvorslevin menetelmää ja tarkistusta varten vedenjohtavuus on laskettu myös Thiemin kaavalla.

Tulosten mukaan vedenjohtavuus PP-rei’issä vaihtelee välillä 10-9 m/s - 10-4 m/s ja PVP-rei’issä välillä 10-6 m/s - 10-4 m/s. Vaihteluväli on lähes sama kuin vuoden 2002 mittauksissa. Myös mittaustulokset rei’issä, jotka mitattiin sekä vuonna 2002 että 2004, ovat hyvin lähellä toisiaan. Tulokset sopivat hyvin myös pohjavesinäytteenoton yhteydessä tehtyjen esipumppausten antamiin vedenjohtavuustuloksiin.

Avainsanat: Vedenjohtavuus, slug-testi, käytetyn ydinpolttoaineen loppusijoitus, hydrologia

Page 7: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base
Page 8: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

PREFACE

This report is part of the program for the final disposal of the nuclear fuel waste at the Olkiluoto island. The main aim of the study is to investigate the hydraulic conductivity close ground surface.

The field measurements were done by Jere Lahdenperä, Posiva Oy using the technique and equipment developed by PRG-Tec (Hellä & Heikkinen 2004). The interpretation of the results has been done at JP-Fintact Oy by Pirjo Hellä. The report is compiled by Eveliina Tammisto (JP-Fintact Oy).

Henry Ahokas (JP-Fintact Oy) is thanked for the valuable comments and guidance of the interpretation work and reporting.

Page 9: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base
Page 10: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

1

CONTENTS

ABSTRACT

TIIVISTELMÄ

PREFACE

CONTENTS.................................................................................................................. 1

1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 3

2 Field measurements.......................................................................................... 5

2.1 Measurements in PP holes.................................................................... 6

2.2 Measurements in PVP-tubes ................................................................. 7

3 Method of interpretation .................................................................................... 9

3.1 Hvorslev’s method................................................................................. 9

3.2 Thiem’s formula..................................................................................... 9

4 Data processing .............................................................................................. 13

5 Results............................................................................................................ 15

6 On the accuracy of the results......................................................................... 21

6.1 Detection limits .................................................................................... 21

6.2 Effect of the time used in interpretation................................................ 23

6.3 Comparison with the pre-pumping results............................................ 24

7 Conclusions .................................................................................................... 27

References ................................................................................................................. 29

Appendix 1 Description of the data processing macros............................................... 31

Appendix 2 Measurements and results in PP2 ........................................................... 35

Appendix 3 Measurements and results in PP38.......................................................... 45

Appendix 4 Measurements and results in PP39.......................................................... 55

Appendix 5 Measurements and results in PVP2 ......................................................... 65

Appendix 6 Measurements and results in PVP4A....................................................... 69

Appendix 7 Measurements and results in PVP4B....................................................... 71

Appendix 8 Measurements and results in PVP11 ....................................................... 73

Appendix 9 Measurements and results in PVP12 ....................................................... 77

Appendix 10 Measurements and results in PVP13 ..................................................... 79

Appendix 11 Measurements and results in PVP14 ..................................................... 83

Appendix 12 Comparison of the obtained K-values with the prepumping results ........ 87

Page 11: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

2

Page 12: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

3

1 INTRODUCTION

As part of the program for the final disposal of the nuclear fuel waste, Posiva Oy investigates the prevailing hydrological conditions at the Olkiluoto island. Hydrogeological conditions of deep bedrock have been studied for several years at Olkiluoto. In deep boreholes, test pumpings have been done to investigate the hydraulic connections. To complement the knowledge already available from deep boreholes, the hydraulic conductivity in shallow bedrock and overburden was measured. PRG-Tec has developed the necessary equipment and technique to measure the distribution of conductivity close ground surface and measured the hydraulic conductivity in a number of shallow holes in 2002 (Hellä & Heikkinen 2004). The first PP-holes were measured in June 2002 and PVP-tubes in September 2002. Further measurements were done in 2004. The PP-holes were measured in July 2004 and the PVP-holes in June and December 2004 expect PVP2 in January 2005. This report describes these new measurements, the method of interpretation, results and detection limits. The equipment has been described in the report of the earlier measurements (Hellä & Heikkinen 2004).

Page 13: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

4

Page 14: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

5

2 FIELD MEASUREMENTS

The field measurements were done during June, July and December 2004 and PVP2 was measured in January 2005. The measured boreholes are presented in Figure 2-1 and listed in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2 (Teollisuuden Voima Oy 1989, Lehto 2001, Niemi & Roos 2004). Detais of the measurements in shallow (PP-holes) and groundwater observation tubes (PVP-tubes) with comments are presented in Appendices 2 to 11.

Figure 2-1. Location of the shallow boreholes where slug tests have been done. In red the ones presented in this study.

Table 2-1. Measured PP-holes and measurement times and operators.

Area Hole Date start Time start Date stop Time stop Operator

Olkiluoto PP2 8.7.2004 12:30 8.7.2004 15:27 Jere lahdenperä/Posiva Oy

Olkiluoto PP38 1.7.2004 14:30 1.7.2004 15:46 Jere lahdenperä/Posiva Oy

Olkiluoto PP38 2.7.2004 8:50 2.7.2004 10:49 Jere lahdenperä/Posiva Oy

Olkiluoto PP39 6.7.2004 13:51 6.7.2004 16:37 Jere lahdenperä/Posiva Oy

Page 15: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

6

Table 2-2. Measured PVP-tubes, measurement times and main information on measurements.

Hole Date Time Operator Pressure sensor movement/m

Notes

PVP2 12.1.2005 13:22 and 13:26

Jere Lahdenperä/ Posiva Oy

1.5 and 1.5

PVP4A 30.6.2004 15:35 Jere Lahdenperä/ Posiva Oy

1.5

PVP4B 30.6.2004 16:00 Jere Lahdenperä/ Posiva Oy

1.5

PVP11 9.12.2004 14:49 and 14:59

Jere Lahdenperä/ Posiva Oy

1.5 and 1.5

PVP12 9.12.2004 15:32 Jere Lahdenperä/ Posiva Oy

1.5

PVP13 9.12.2004 13:28 and 13.41

Jere Lahdenperä/ Posiva Oy

1.5 and 1.0 Water table rose too much at first measurement so the second one was done with

smaller movement. PVP14 30.6.2004 13:33 and

13:44 Jere Lahdenperä/

Posiva Oy 1.5 and 1.5

2.1 Measurements in PP holes

The PP-holes have been measured using one-meter test section.

The measurement is divided into three stages:

1. Stabilization: the water level is stabilized in the hole after moving the equipment.

2. Inflation: the pressure level is stabilized in the hole and in the test section after inflating the packers.

3. Measurement: the piston is either pushed or pulled in the test section or water is poured into it. In the measurement, the stabilizing of the pressure transient is followed up.

Each of the three stages has a specific duration, see Table 2-3. An example of the water levels at different measurement stages is shown in Figure 2-2.

Table 2-3. Duration of the measurement stages.

Stage Time minimum/min Time maximum/min 1 1 2 2 2 5 3 5 15

Page 16: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

7

15:20 15:25 15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Pressure sensor of the measurement sectionPressure sensor of the hole waterlevel

OlkiluotoPP2

Stage1 Stage2 Stage3

Figure 2-2. An example of measurement results in a PP-hole.

2.2 Measurements in PVP-tubes

The groundwater observation tubes are measured without packers, using only the piston (pressure sensor). A PVC-tube is installed around the pressure sensor in order to increase the diameter of the piston and to generate an adequate pressure change after moving the piston. Only one measurement per each hole is made with this method as each hole consists of a plastic tube with two meters perforated section installed in the overburden.

The measurement is divided into two stages, Stage 1 and Stage 3 of the PP measurements see Table 2-3. An example of the measurement is presented in Figure 2-3.

Page 17: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

8

14:30 14:35 14:40 14:45 14:50

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00Pressure sensor of the hole waterlevel

OlkiluotoPVP3A

Stage1 Stage3

Figure 2-3. An example of measurement results in a PVP-tube.

Page 18: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

9

3 METHOD OF INTERPRETATION

3.1 Hvorslev’s method

The slug-test results were interpreted using Hvorslev’s method (Freeze & Cherry 1979). A homogeneous, isotropic, infinite medium in which both soil and water are incompressible is assumed. This assumption is valid when a fracture or the network of fractures is homogenous and planar (can be seen in the analysis as a linear behaviour). According to Hvorslev, the flow rate q at time t is related to the hydraulic conductivity K and to the unrecovered head difference H-h (H reference water level, h head at time t) according to following equation:

q(t) = p r2 dh / dt = FK(H-h), (Equation 3-1.)

where r is the radius of the hole and F depends on the shape and dimensions of the piezometer. The flow rate will decrease asymptotically to zero with increasing time. Solution of the differential equation 3-1 is

H-h = (H-H0) e –t/T0 (Equation 3-2.)

with initial condition h = H0 at t = 0 and the basic time lag T0 defined as

T0 = p r2 / FK . (Equation 3-3.)

Plotting the normalized head recovery (H-h) / (H-H0) on a logarithmic scale against time results in a straight line, if a fracture or aquifer under measurement is ideal i.e. homogeneous, planar and cylinder-symmetric. The basic time lag T0 can be defined from the plot being the time t, when ln (H-h)/(H-H0)= -1. The shape factor suggested by Hvorslev can be applied as the assumption of L/R > 8 (L length and R radius of the piezometer intake) is valid. The resulting equation for the hydraulic conductivity K is

K = r2 ln(L/R) / 2LT0 . (Equation 3-4.)

Figure 3-1 clarifies the notation used in the equations above.

3.2 Thiem’s formula

For the control of the results the hydraulic conductivity K was also calculated based on Thiem’s formula:

K = Q ln(r0/rw) / (2 p L ∆h) . (Equation 3-5.)

Page 19: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

10

In Equation 3-5, Q is the flow rate (= Adh/dt, A is the void area between connection rods and the pressure cable, see Figure 3-1, dh change in head during the time interval dt), r0 is the radius of influence assumed to be 14 m, rw is radius of the borehole, L is the length of the test section and ∆h is the overpressure i.e. the head difference to the reference water level in the measurement section.

Two different cases were calculated separately, tight intervals with hardly any observed recovery and intervals with rather high hydraulic conductivity i.e. the ones with clear recovery. The calculation of the hydraulic conductivity in the two cases differed in the chosen time interval. In the case of clear observed flow, dt is short and the time at which the conductivity is calculated is chosen to be in the middle of the recovery period. As the recovery is not linear, the result is sensitive to the selection of the time, when the hydraulic conductivity is calculated (see Figure 3-2 a). If there is hardly any flow, a longer time interval equal to one third of the recovery period is used (see Figure 3-2 b). Slow recovery is approximately linear and the Thiem’s formula gives a reliable estimation of the hydraulic conductivity.

t inf inity

Ht = 0

H0

L

t+dtdh

h

t

packers

pressure sensor

PC

supporting rods

pressure cable

hole

Figure 3-1. Principle of the slug-test and interpretation according to Hvorslev’s method (modified after Freeze and Cherry 1979).

Page 20: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

11

a)

t0 tend

h1

t1

h2

t2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

t (s)

wat

er le

vel h

(m, b

elow

gro

und

leve

l)

b)

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

t (s)

wat

er le

vel h

(m

, bel

ow g

roun

d le

vel)

tendt1 t2

h1h2

t0

Figure 3-2. Calculation of the hydraulic conductivity according to Thiem’s formula: in case of a) clear recovery and b) a tight interval with very slow recovery.

Page 21: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

12

Page 22: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

13

4 DATA PROCESSING

For the interpretation of the measurement data, a set of MSExcel-macros was developed (see Appendix 1 for the details). The actual analysis of the results uses a template file (xls), which contains the necessary formulas and graph templates (see Appendices 2 to 11). The figures on the template include a graph of the measured water level both in the borehole and in the measurement section. Another figure depicts the interpretation i.e. (H-h)/(H-H0) is plotted on a logarithmic scale versus time. In the latter figure also the fitted line through the measured points is plotted. The macro copies the data from the measurement file to the analysis template file. The functions and images in the template file are modified automatically. Further on, the results, K-values by Hvorslev’s method and the two K-values obtained by Thiem’s formula, together with some comments are copied to a separate result file.

The reference for all depth values in the results is the ground level whereas in the data files the reference is the top of the casing (TOC). The subtraction of the TOC is done automatically by the macros. The reference water level H is determined to be the average water level during phase one, Figure 2-2 and Figure 3-1 are referred for the notation. Phase one is used as the water level during it is more stable than during phase 2. H0, the water level at the measurement section after the disturbance, either adding water or lowering the pressure sensor in the borehole, is defined to be h at 10 (PP-holes) / 20 (PVP-holes) time steps after the minimum observed h. The minimum is not used as in the measurements, where the sensor is lowered, a piston effect occurs and the water level changes rapidly due to the movement. The time shift compensates this phenomenon, although potentially part of the recovery period on highly conductive intervals is lost. An example is given in Figure 4-1. There is a possibility to adjust the time period used for line fitting manually, if necessary. The time range used is shown on the interpretation plot.

min h

t0

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

6

53870 53880 53890 53900t (s)

wat

er le

vel h

(m, b

elow

gro

und

leve

l)

Figure 4-1. An example of the behavior of the water level in the measurement section at the time of lowering the pressure sensor.

Page 23: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

14

A straight line is fitted through ln(H-h)/(H-H0) as function of time. The time interval used for the fitting is from t0, the time corresponding H0, to tend corresponding either the end time of the measuring period or the time when (H-h)/(H-H0) reaches 0.1 or the time when (H-h)/(H-H0) gets negative, this might happen if the data is noisy at the end of the measurement. The basic time lag, T0 needed for the Hvorslev analysis is then calculated from the resulting line equation. When T0 is known, the hydraulic conductivity K can be derived from equation 3-4. The time instants used in the Thiem’s formula are determined as described in chapter 3.2 and in Figure 3-2. The water levels h1 and h2 corresponding the times t1 and t2 are calculated as an average of eleven observed h values around time t. Average is used to compensate the possibly noisy data. Otherwise, erroneous results are obtained especially in case of a very small flow, when the changes in water level are small and the values of h are oscillating around an average level. Once the corresponding h and t values are defined, an average head difference to borehole can be calculated together with the outflow Q. These are then further used to calculate the hydraulic conductivity K assuming r0 to be 14 m. To check the correctness of the interpretation the quotient of the hydraulic conductivities KHvorslev / KThiem is calculated. If the ratio is between 1/3 and three, these two results are considered to be in accordance. On most of the tight intervals, T0 is not reached meaning that the value of T0 has to be extrapolated outside the observed time range and the result is thus more uncertain than in cases when T0 is reached during the observation period.

Page 24: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

15

5 RESULTS

The interpretation of the hydraulic conductivities in each of the measured holes and sections are presented in Appendices 2 to 11. Three typical recovery curves were observed and an example of each type is given in Figure 5-1. In Figure 5-2, summary of the results in PP-holes is presented and Figure 5-3 contains the summary of the results in PVP-tubes. The cumulative distributions of the measured hydraulic conductivities are presented in Figures 5-4 and 5-5. In these figures the measurements of 2002 and 2004 are compared. In 2002 and 2004, mainly different holes and tubes were measured, which explains the difference in results. Only PP2, PVP4A and PVP4B have been measured both 2002 and 2004. These results are compared in Figure 5-6.

Page 25: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

16

a)

b)

c)

Figure 5-1. Type of the observed recovery curves, a) a tight section with hardly any recovery, b) section with clear recovery resulting in a linear trend on the semi-log plot and c) a section with rapid recovery, which is not linear on the semi-log plot.

Page 26: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

17

Figure 5-2. Hydraulic conductivity in PP-holes.

Page 27: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

18

Figure 5-3. Hydraulic conductivity in PVP-holes. In PVP2 exact depth levels on overburden, bedrock and perforated section are not known.

Page 28: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

19

PP cumulative distribution K

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1.0E-11 1.0E-10 1.0E-09 1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04

K (m/s)

Fre

quen

cy %

2002 KHvorslev (m/s) 2004 KHvorslev (m/s)

2002 and 2004 KHvorslev (m/s)

Figure 5-4. Cumulative distribution of the hydraulic conductivities in PP-tubes .

PVP cumulative distribution of K

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.0E-03

K (m/s)

Freq

uenc

y %

2002 KHvorslev (m/s) 2004 KHvorslev (m/s)

2002 and 2004 KHvorslev (m/s)

Figure 5-5. Cumulative distribution of the hydraulic conductivities in PVP-holes.

Page 29: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

20

PP2

0

5

10

15

20

25

1.00E-09 1.00E-07 1.00E-05 1.00E-03 1.00E-01

Khorslev (m/s)D

epth

(m

)

PP2 2002 PP2 2004

PVP4A 2002 PVP4A 2004

PVP4B 2002 PVP4B 2004

Figure 5-6. Results fromPP-holes and PVP-tubes measured both 2002 and 2004.

Page 30: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

21

6 ON THE ACCURACY OF THE RESULTS

6.1 Detection limits

The interpreted hydraulic conductivities are in the range from 10-9 m/s to 10-4 m/s in PP-holes and from 10-6 m/s to 10-4 m/s in PVP-holes. In the following the detection limits are estimated.

The accuracy of the water level obtained by the pressure sensor is ±1-2 mm. By analysing the recovery of some of the tight intervals it was noticed that the change in water level has to be at least 5 mm, so that it can be distinguished from the noise. The recovery period varies from 200 s to 1000 s. Taking the geometry of the tool and the hole into account this leads to minimum observable flow of 2·10-9 - 8·10-9 m3/s (30 ml/h) in PP-holes. The overpressure is typically 2 m leading to hydraulic conductivity 1·10-9 - 4·10-9 m/s according to Thiem’s formula. Consequently, the lower detection limit in PP-holes is about 5·10-9 m/s. The diameter of the PVP-holes and the instrument used are different and a typical overpressure is 1.5 m resulting in the detection limit of 1·10-8 m/s.

The upper limit of the measurement range is not as clear as the lower limit. It is estimated to be of the order of 5·10-5 m/s in PP-holes. This value is deduced assuming a steel rod with a diameter of 2.5 cm, including the pressure sensor hose inside the rod with a diameter of about half of the steel rod, and further more overpressure of 2 m and a 2 m decrease in water level within 10 s. The observed conductivity can be higher as the flow is not necessarily steady-state as assumed in the estimation of the detection limit. In PVP-holes the geometry is different and the used overpressure 1.5 m, resulting in an upper limit of 8·10-5 m/s. The diameter of PP-holes is 46 mm or 56 mm. The detection limits are calculated to 46 mm holes but are practically the same for 56 mm holes. The highest observed conductivity in the PP-holes is 3.4·10-5 m/s in hole PP2 at the depth 13.45 m (Appendix 2), where the water level in the measurement section decreased 0.5 m during 15 seconds. The difference between the water level in the measurement section and in the open hole was about 20 cm at the most. The same section has been measured in 2002 with analogous results. Repeatability seems to be good. When the sensor is lowered, there is a period of about 2-3 s, when the water level is unstable. The interpretation can be started first after more stabile conditions are reached so the recovery period should last at least 5 seconds. During the first seconds the water table already decreases considerably on sections with a high conductivity and the overpressure H0, which can be used in the interpretation is thus considerably less than the theoretical value of 2 m, as the example shows. In PVP-holes the highest observed conductivity is 8.3·10-5 m/s (PVP14, see Appendix 11). The recovery period is about 10 s and the change in water level is about 50 cm. The result is of the order of the maximum observable flow. In this case the flow is not linear on the semi-log plot. About the same limits are obtained by comparing the hydraulic conductivities resulting from the interpretations using the two methods, Hvorslev and Thiem. In general, the hydraulic conductivities calculated according to Thiem’s equation and according to Hvorslev’s method seem to be well in accordance, see Figure 6-1. The results from PP-

Page 31: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

22

holes agree extremely well, when the conductivity is higher than about 5·10-8 m/s. In these cases T0 is reached during the observation period. When the hydraulic conductivity is small, i.e. hardly no recovery is observed the results obtained by the two methods give slightly different results, KThiem being approximately two to three times higher than KHvorslev. In the PVP-holes higher conductivities are observed and the interpreted hydraulic conductivity according to two methods match relatively well.

a)

1.0E-10

1.0E-09

1.0E-08

1.0E-07

1.0E-06

1.0E-05

1.0E-04

1.0E-10 1.0E-09 1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04

KHvorslev (m/s)

KT

hie

m (

m/s

)

2002 results 2004 results Ø = 56 mm

b)

1.0E-08

1.0E-07

1.0E-06

1.0E-05

1.0E-04

1.0E-03

1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.0E-03

KHvorslev (m/s)

KT

hie

m (

m/s

)

2002 results 2004 results

Figure 6-1. Comparison of the hydraulic conductivities calculated either by the Hvorslev’s method or using Thiem’s formula in a) PP-holes, in red the holes which diameter is 56 mm, and b) in PVP-holes.

Page 32: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

23

The coefficient of correlation (R2), which measures the linear relationship between ln(H-h) / (H-H0) and time t, decreases clearly when the hydraulic conductivity in PP-holes is less than 5·10-9 m/s and in PVP-holes less than 5·10-7 m/s, see Figure 6-2. 6.2 Effect of the time used in interpretation

As can be observed from Figure 6-1, the hydraulic conductivity by Hvorslev’s method is normally less than the one obtained by Thiem’s formula in PP-holes. This is mainly due to the selection of the time range used in the interpretation. Also the time interval chosen for the interpretation can be a significant source of error in cases when the recovery is rapid. Selection of the starting time affects also the H0, the reference water level. Figure 6-3 gives an example of the effect of the selected time range. In the result figures (Appendices 2 to 11), the time range used in the interpretation according to Thiem’s formula and in the Hvorslev’s method are therefore shown.

a)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.0E-10 1.0E-09 1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04

KHvorslev (m/s)

2002 results 2004 results

b)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.0E-03

KHvorslev (m/s)

2002 results 2004 results

Figure 6-2. R2 as a function on hydraulic conductivity K in a) PP-holes and b) PVP-holes.

R2

R2

Page 33: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

24

3) KHvorslev negative, KThiem = 1.5E-6 m/s

2) KHvorslev = 2.3E-6 m/s, KThiem = 2.0E-6 m/s

1) KHvorslev = 2.3E-6 m/s, KThiem = 2.8E-6 m/s

-0.5

-0.1

0.3

0.7

1.1

1.554500 54600 54700 54800 54900 55000

t (s)

wat

er le

vel h

(m, b

elow

gro

und

leve

l)

Open borehole Measurement Section Intervals

1

2

3

0.1

1.0

10.0

54500 54600 54700 54800 54900 55000 55100

t (s)

(H-h

)/(H

-H0)

Figure 6-3. An example how the time selected for the interpretation affects the resulting hydraulic conductivity. Three time intervals were used each corresponding to approximately one third of the recovery. The example is from PP2 at depth of 19.42 m. The interpreted values for this section were KHvorslev 1.1·10-6 m/s and KThiem 8.1·10-7 m/s. For the interval 3 the interpretation according to Hvorslev’s method failed as the T0 gets negative.

6.3 Comparison with the pre-pumping results

Groundwater sampling has been done partly in the same holes as the slug-tests during the summer 2004 (Tuominen 1998, Kröger 2004). Before taking the samples, the hole is pre-pumped for a certain period of time, typically few hours. The yield (l/min) and the change in the water table (m) are measured. Using this information and the length of the measurement section (either part of the hole below the water table or the perforated section in the groundwater observation tubes), hydraulic conductivity can be obtained

Page 34: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

25

according to the Thiem’s formula (Equation 3-5). These values were compared to the conductivities resulting from the slug-tests. For the PP-holes, were the slug-tests were performed on 1 m measurement sections an average for the entire hole was calculated for the comparison. The results are shown in Figure 6-4 and listed in Appendix 12. The results from the pre-pumping match well with those from the slug-tests (Figure 6-4). Results of year 2004 are in red and results of year 2002 in grey. In general, pre-pumping values are slightly smaller which is natural because the time used for measurements is much longer than in slug-tests and natural decrease of flow during long-term pumping causes lower values of hydraulic conductivity. In cases where pre-pumping values are higher it is possible that outside the range measured by slug-test, a conductive fracture exists resulting in a higher conductivity in the pumping test, which measures the whole open borehole.

PVP3B

PVP9B

PP7

PVP14

PVP4B

PVP13

PP2

PP39

PP38

1.0E-08

1.0E-07

1.0E-06

1.0E-05

1.0E-04

1.0E-03

1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.0E-03

Pre-pumping, KThiem (m/s)

Slu

g te

st, K

Thi

em (m

/s)

*

Figure 6-4. Comparison of the hydraulic conductivities (m/s) obtained by the interpretation of the slug-tests and the pre-pumping in connection of groundwater sampling, results of 2002 in grey and results of 2004 in red.

Page 35: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

26

Page 36: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

27

7 CONCLUSIONS

Slug-tests were performed in several shallow (PP and PVP) holes at Olkiluoto mainly during the summer and the autumn 2004. The measurements were done using the same technique and equipment developed by PRG-Tec Oy as in the measurements in 2002 (Hellä & Heikkinen 2004).

The measurement results were interpreted by using Hvorslev’s method. For the comparison the conductivity was also calculated using Thiem’s formula. The interpretation was done by using for the purpose written MSExcel-macros. The analysis method developed is easy to use and quick as manual work is hardly needed for the file operations.

According to the results hydraulic conductivities in PP-holes range from 10-9 m/s to 10-4 m/s and in PVP-holes from 10-6 m/s to 10-4 m/s. With the applied technique in PP-holes flow in the range 5·10-9 – 5·10-5 m/s and in the range 1·10-8 – 8·10-5 m/s in PVP holes can be detected. The hydraulic conductivities resulting from the interpretation of the slug-tests were compared to those obtained by the pumping. The comparison showed that both results are in acceptable accordance with each other. The range of hydraulic conductivities in 2004 measurements is almost the same as in measurements of year 2002. In 2002 and 2004, mainly different holes and tubes were measured. Only holes PP2, PVP4A and PVP4B are measured both 2002 and 2004 and the results are very close to each other.

Page 37: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

28

Page 38: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

29

REFERENCES

Freeze, R. A. & Cherry, J.A. 1979. Groundwater. Prentice Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. United States. 604 p.

Kröger, T. 2004. Groundwater Sampling from Shallow Boreholes (PP and PR) and Groundwater Observation Tubes (PVP) at Olkiluoto in 2003. Eurajoki, Finland, Posiva Oy. 117 p. Working report 2004-44.

Hellä, P. & Heikkinen, P. 2004. Slug Tests in Shallow Holes at Olkiluoto 2002. Eurajoki, Finland, Posiva Oy. 201 p. Working Report 2004-13.

Lehto, K. 2001.Installation of groundwater observation tubes at Olkiluoto in Eurajoki 2001. Helsinki, Finland, Posiva Oy. 58 p. Working report 2001-39.

Niemi, K. & Roos, S. 2004. Havaintoputkien asentaminen, matalien kairareikien kairaaminen, painokairaaminen ja maaperänäytteet Eurajoen Olkiluodon tutkimusalueella vuoden 2003 syksyllä. Eurajoki, Finland, Posiva Oy. 43 p. Working report 2004-03. (in finnish)

Suomen Malmi Oy. 1989. Bedrock Surface Drillings in Olkiluoto, Eurajoki. Helsinki, Finland, Teollisuuden Voima Oy. 6 p. Working report 89-70.

Tuominen, M. 1998. Hydrogeochemical studies at Olkiluoto During 1997: Drilled Holes PR3 and PR4 and Ground Water Pipes PVP1 and PVP2. Helsinki, Finland, Posiva Oy.39 p. Working Report 98-07.

Öhberg, A. & Rouhiainen, P. 2000. Posiva groundwater flow measuring techniques. Helsinki, Finland, Posiva Oy. 81 p. POSIVA 2000-12.

Page 39: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

30

Page 40: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

31

APPENDIX 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE DATA PROCESSING MACROS

For the interpretation of the measurement data the same macros developed as part of the interpretation of the results of the slug measurements in 2002 (Hellä & Heikkinen 2004) were used. Some modifications were done:

• The separate macros for interpreting the results from PP- and PVP-holes were combined.

• An input box was added in the start of program which enable the user to select whether he is processing data from PP- or PVP-holes.

• In the input box it also possible to select if the time range used in the interpretation is automatically selected or if the user wants to define the time range manually.

• The borehole diameter and section length information can now be given in the makefile, the values replace the erroneous or missing values in the data files.

• The time instants used in Thiem’s equation were adjusted. They are now based on the change in head not on the length of the recovery period.

• Handling of errors was enhanced and the user is given information of the reason why the processing stops.

For the interpretation a MSExcel-file containing the necessary functions and graphs was used as a template. The macro copies the necessary data from the measurement file to the analysis template. The functions and graphs in the template file are modified automatically. Further on the results, K-values by Hvorslev’s method and the two K-values obtained by Thiem’s equation, together with some comments are copied to a separate result file. Also, the sheet with the interpretations is printed both as a paper copy and to a pdf-file.

Input Data

Data from the header of the measurement files used for interpretation:

- Top of the casing (m), reference level of all the depth values in the measurement file - Depth of the pressure sensor, borehole (m) - Initial depth of the pressure sensor of the measurement section (m) - Depth of the pressure sensor of the measurement section after movement (m) - Length of the measurement section (m) - Hole diameter (mm) - And from the data columns:

Cable Depth (column A) depth of the top of the measurement section (ref TOC), only first value used

Date (column B) date, only first value used Time (s) (column C) Time Phase (columnD) 1 = open borehole equipment installed

2 = inflation of packers + stabilization of pressure 3 = pressure increase + recovery phase

WaterLevelBorehole(m) (column G) water column above pressure sensor of borehole water WaterLevelMeasurementSection(m) (column K)

water column above pressure sensor of measurement section

Page 41: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

32

The template workbook

The template workbook analysis_template.xls contains three sheets

parameters for input parameters, results and figure of the water level at the borehole and in the measurement section during the measurement and a figure with the measurement results and the fitted line. The data copied from the input file is marked with italic. The contents with some comments is described below:

- input file, name of the input file containing the hole id and the file number - date, date of the measurement - TOC (m), length of the casing above ground level - depth of pressure sensor open hole (m), measured from the top of the casing - depth of pressure sensor meas. section (m), measured from the top of the casing - depth of meas. section (m), top of the section measured from the top of the casing - depth of meas. section (m), midpoint of the section measured from ground level - tube diameter (mm), diameter of the tube having an equal area to a double tube with

given inner and outer diameter (16.6/24.9 mm in PP-holes and 40/56 mm in PVP-holes)

- r (mm), radius of the tube with the above diameter - H, initial water level (m, below ground level) average of the observed values during

phase 1 - H0, water level (m, below ground level) after the disturbance, H0* = min(water level

in measurement section), H0 = water level in measurement section 10 observations after H0*, the shift is done because the water level changes rapidly just after the moving of the pressure sensor.

- t0, time corresponding H0, start time of the line fitting or the time instant given by the user

- tend (s), end time of the line fitting, is either the end time of the measuring period, or the time when (H-h)/(H-H0) reaches 0.1 or the time when (H-h)/(H-H0) gets negative, this might happen if the data is noisy at the end of the measurement, the user can also define the tend

- T0, time when (H-h)/(H-H0) = 0.37, calculated from the estimated line equation - L (m), length of the measurement section - screen diam. (mm), hole diameter - screen radius R (mm), hole radius - L/R - K (m/s), hydraulic conductivity calculated according to equation 4-4. - logK

For the calculation of hydraulic conductivity according to Thiem’s equation following data is used:

Two time instants are used in calculating the flow for the Thiem analysis and two cases are considered:

- flow

Page 42: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

33

o t1 (s) corresponds to the time when h is equal to (H + H0) / 2, if such h is not reached t1 is defined to be the time corresponding to one third of the recovery period.

o t2 (s) is 20 observations later - no flow

o t1 (s) is 20 observations later than t0 o t2 (s) is determined to be t0 + (tend – t0)/3, but if the recovery period is

short, less than 40 time steps, then the whole recovery is used i.e. t2 equal to tend

- h1 (m) is the average of 11 observed h values at time t1, average is used to compensate the possibly noisy data, otherwise erroneous results are obtained especially in case of no flow

- h2 (m) is the average of 11 observed h values at time t2 - dh (m) is the average change in water level, ∆h in equation 4-5, dh = (h1+h2)/2 – H0 - Q (m3/s) observed flow in time t1 – t2 - KThiem (m/s) hydraulic conductivity assuming r0 = 14 m - logK - KHvorslev / KThiem quotient of the hydraulic conductivities according to the two

methods The sheet contains also two figures, the first one presents the measured water levels in the open borehole and in the measurement section. The measured values are corrected so that the reference is always ground level. The other figure shows the results of the Hvorslev’s method, the measured (H-h)/(H-H0) values are plotted on a logarithmic scale as a function of time, also the fitted line is shown as well as the line (H-h)/(H-H0) = 0.37.

data initial measurement data together with the processed one. The columns are the following:

- Time(s), copy of the time column of the input file - Phase, copy of the phase column of the input file - WaterLevelBorehole(m), copy of the water level/borehole column of the input file - WaterLevelMeasurementSection(m), copy of the water level/measurement section

column of the input file - Open borehole, corrected water level in the open borehole below ground level (m)

taking into account the depth of the pressure sensor and the casing (=ps_depth – toc - wl)

- Measurement Section, h, corrected water level in the measurement section below ground level (m) taking into account the depth of the pressure sensor and the casing (=ps_depth – toc - wl). Here, the possible change in the pressure sensor depth is taken into account.

- t, time from t0 i.e. start of the line fitting - H-h, change in the water level at the measurement section - H-H0, the total over pressure (m) - (H-h)/(H-H0) - ln((H-h)/(H-H0)) - fitted, the fitted values at the given time

Page 43: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

34

- (H-h)/(H-H0)<0.1, used to define the end of the time interval used in the line fitting

support data needed to draw a line (H-h)/(H-H0) = 0.37 in the lower figure on sheet parameters.

Subprograms

The interpretation macro consists of following subprograms:

prepare_file_for_analysis opens a file containing measurement data and copies the necessary data to the analysis template deleting the header rows of the input data file

preliminary_analysis modifies the functions and images in the analysis template workbook to correspond the current data file.

Write_results writes the results of the analysis to the results workbook (filename, depth of measurement section, hydraulic conductivity K according to Hvorslev’s method and the two Thiem approximations, R2-value of the line fitting and comments:

T0 not reached means that during the recovery period (H-h)/(H-H0) does not reach value 0.37 corresponding the time needed for the recovery assuming steady state flow. This means that the value of T0 has to be extrapolated outside the observed time range and the result is thus more uncertain than in the case when T0 is reached during the observation period.

Thiem different means that the hydraulic conductivity by Hvorslev’s method is at least three times greater or smaller than the one obtained by Thiem’s method.

q increasing with time means that the fitted line has a positive slope and thus no recovery is observed, indicates an error.

Negative K means hydraulic conductivity obtained by Hvorslev’s method is negative indicating an error.

Print_results prints the paper copy and a pdf-file from the parameters-sheet.

Page 44: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

Are

a:H

ole

:M

easu

rer:

Olk

iluot

o

PP

2Je

re L

ahde

nper

ä

Wat

er le

vel b

efor

e st

artin

g 2.

40 m

The

ref

eren

ce le

vel t

o de

pth

is to

p of

cas

ing

File

Dat

eTi

me

Dep

th

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

open

bo

reho

le

(m)

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

mea

s.

sect

ion

(m)

Pou

ring

wat

er/

Mov

ing

pist

onN

OT

E!

mea

sure

men

t/hol

e &

run

mea

sure

men

t de

pth

(m)

belo

w g

roun

d le

vel

mid

poin

t of t

he

sect

ion

KH

vors

lev

(m/s

)R

2K

Thie

m

(m/s

)flo

w

KTh

iem

(m/s

)tig

ht

com

men

ts

171

8.7.

2004

12:3

013

.94

33.

922.

00 m

OLP

PP

2000

171.

DA

T13

.45

3.37

E-0

50.

9976

5.39

E-0

55.

70E

-05

172

8.7.

2004

12:4

514

.94

32.

922.

00 m

OLP

PP

2000

172.

DA

T14

.45

4.12

E-0

80.

9961

6.49

E-0

88.

51E

-08

T0

not r

each

ed

173

8.7.

2004

13:0

615

.94

32.

922.

00 m

OLP

PP

2000

173.

DA

T15

.45

1.73

E-0

70.

9923

3.57

E-0

74.

96E

-07

T0

not r

each

ed

174

8.7.

2004

13:3

516

.94

32.

922.

00 m

OLP

PP

2000

174.

DA

T16

.45

2.29

E-0

70.

9994

3.92

E-0

74.

07E

-07

175

8.7.

2004

13:5

617

.94

32.

922.

00 m

OLP

PP

2000

175.

DA

T17

.45

1.94

E-0

70.

9985

2.81

E-0

73.

58E

-07

176

8.7.

2004

14:2

118

.94

32.

922.

00 m

OLP

PP

2000

176.

DA

T18

.45

1.01

E-0

60.

9780

1.55

E-0

61.

60E

-06

177

8.7.

2004

14:4

119

.94

32.

922.

00 m

OLP

PP

2000

177.

DA

T19

.45

1.27

E-0

60.

9079

2.33

E-0

62.

53E

-06

178

8.7.

2004

14:5

821

.94

32.

922.

00 m

OLP

PP

2000

178.

DA

T21

.45

6.38

E-0

90.

9347

2.69

E-0

91.

38E

-08

T0

not r

each

ed

179

8.7.

2004

15:1

820

.94

32.

922.

00 m

OLP

PP

2000

179.

DA

T20

.45

4.03

E-0

70.

9997

6.60

E-0

76.

78E

-07

et9t
APPENDIX 2
et9t
35
Page 45: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

PP

2000

171.

DA

Tda

te8.

7.20

04

TOC

(m)

0.99

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

42 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)3.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)5.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)13

.94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)13

.45

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

44

H0

0.87

t 045

456.

3

t end

(s)

4546

6.9

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

10.6

T 04.

7

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

46

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

23

L/R

43.4

8

K (

m/s

)3.

47E

-05

logK

-4.4

6ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.2

1338

0652

-0.0

0034

5557

t145

457.

3h1

0.97

0.00

1583

653

0.00

9747

645

t245

462.

0h2

1.26

0.99

760.

0335

8178

6Q

(m

3 /s)

1.69

E-0

5dh

(m)

0.32

1815

4.72

856

44K

Thi

em (m

/s)

5.39

E-0

5lo

gK-4

.27

20.4

7374

788

0.04

9620

401

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

64S

tat t

ests

tig

ht

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

134.

74t1

4546

1.1

h11.

23te

st s

tat,

b <>

00.

04t2

4545

9.9

h21.

17t-

criti

cal,

90%

2.02

Q (

m3 /s

)1.

33E

-05

dh (m

)0.

24K

Thi

em (m

/s)

5.70

E-0

5lo

gK-4

.24

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

61

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

0.1

1.0

10.045

450

4546

045

470

4548

045

490

4550

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8 1

1.2

1.4 45

100

4520

045

300

4540

045

500

4560

045

700

4580

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 2
et9t
36
Page 46: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

PP

2000

172.

DA

Tda

te8.

7.20

04

TOC

(m)

0.99

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

43 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)14

.94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)14

.45

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

44

H0

-0.4

2

t 046

291.

4

t end

(s)

4696

4.7

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

673.

3

T 039

39.6

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

46

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

23

L/R

43.4

8

K (

m/s

)4.

12E

-08

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-7.3

8ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.0

0025

0278

-0.0

1400

2076

t146

514.

2h1

-0.2

92.

9164

8E-0

70.

0001

1352

4t2

4651

8.9

h2-0

.29

0.99

610.

0030

3350

2Q

(m

3 /s)

1.10

E-0

7dh

(m)

1.72

7364

23.8

554

2861

KT

hiem

(m/s

)6.

49E

-08

logK

-7.1

96.

7766

7288

90.

0263

2731

3K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.64

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

085

8.15

t146

296.

2h1

-0.4

1te

st s

tat,

b <>

012

3.34

t246

516.

6h2

-0.2

9t-

criti

cal,

90%

1.96

Q (

m3 /s

)1.

49E

-07

dh (m

)1.

79K

Thi

em (m

/s)

8.51

E-0

8lo

gK-7

.07

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

48

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

0.1

1.0

10.046

250

4645

046

650

4685

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 45

800

4600

046

200

4640

046

600

4680

047

000

4720

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 2
et9t
37
Page 47: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

PP

2000

173.

DA

Tda

te8.

7.20

04

TOC

(m)

0.99

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

43 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)15

.94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)15

.45

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

44

H0

0.16

t 047

536.

3

t end

(s)

4841

1.7

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

875.

4

T 093

6.9

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

46

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

23

L/R

43.4

8

K (

m/s

)1.

73E

-07

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-6.7

6ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.0

0135

3889

0.26

8448

836

t148

252.

3h1

0.79

1.95

014E

-06

0.00

0986

059

t248

256.

9h2

0.80

0.99

230.

0300

6478

4Q

(m

3 /s)

2.24

E-0

7dh

(m)

0.64

4819

83.4

461

3722

KT

hiem

(m/s

)3.

57E

-07

logK

-6.4

543

5.66

0609

63.

3642

8315

6K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.49

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

069

4.25

t147

541.

0h1

-0.4

3te

st s

tat,

b <>

027

2.24

t247

829.

0h2

0.34

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

7.20

E-0

7dh

(m)

1.48

KT

hiem

(m/s

)4.

96E

-07

logK

-6.3

0K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.35

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

0.1

1.0

10.047

500

4770

047

900

4810

048

300

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-0.5

-0.3

-0.1 0.1

0.3

0.5

0.7

0.9

1.1

1.3

1.5 47

000

4750

048

000

4850

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 2
et9t
38
Page 48: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

PP

2000

174.

DA

Tda

te8.

7.20

04

TOC

(m)

0.99

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

43 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)16

.94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)16

.45

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

44

H0

-0.4

9

t 049

064.

7

t end

(s)

4987

5.3

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

810.

5

T 071

0.7

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

46

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

23

L/R

43.4

8

K (

m/s

)2.

29E

-07

logK

-6.6

4ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.0

0136

4474

-0.0

3027

129

t149

543.

4h1

0.47

5.57

111E

-07

0.00

0261

046

t249

548.

1h2

0.48

0.99

940.

0076

4808

7Q

(m

3 /s)

3.71

E-0

7dh

(m)

0.96

5998

562.

409

3441

KT

hiem

(m/s

)3.

92E

-07

logK

-6.4

135

0.87

5284

80.

2012

7520

1K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.58

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

024

49.2

0t1

4906

9.4

h1-0

.47

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

115.

96t2

4933

5.6

h20.

16t-

criti

cal,

90%

1.96

Q (

m3 /s

)6.

36E

-07

dh (m

)1.

60K

Thi

em (m

/s)

4.07

E-0

7lo

gK-6

.39

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

56

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

0.1

1.0

10.049

050

4925

049

450

4965

049

850

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 48

600

4880

049

000

4920

049

400

4960

049

800

5000

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 2
et9t
39
Page 49: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

PP

2000

175.

DA

Tda

te8.

7.20

04

TOC

(m)

0.99

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

44 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)17

.94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)17

.45

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

43

H0

-0.4

7

t 050

513.

2

t end

(s)

5138

5.1

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

871.

9

T 083

5.2

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

46

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

23

L/R

43.4

8

K (

m/s

)1.

94E

-07

logK

-6.7

1ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.0

0115

2768

-0.0

3719

2173

t151

072.

9h1

0.48

7.43

866E

-07

0.00

0374

639

t251

077.

6h2

0.49

0.99

850.

0113

8959

6Q

(m

3 /s)

2.62

E-0

7dh

(m)

0.95

2401

567.

573

3700

KT

hiem

(m/s

)2.

81E

-07

logK

-6.5

531

1.53

8286

50.

4799

7469

4K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.69

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

015

49.7

0t1

5051

7.9

h1-0

.45

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

99.2

7t2

5080

4.3

h20.

14t-

criti

cal,

90%

1.96

Q (

m3 /s

)5.

58E

-07

dh (m

)1.

59K

Thi

em (m

/s)

3.58

E-0

7lo

gK-6

.45

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

54

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

0.1

1.0

10.050

500

5070

050

900

5110

051

300

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 50

000

5050

051

000

5150

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 2
et9t
40
Page 50: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

PP

2000

176.

DA

Tda

te8.

7.20

04

TOC

(m)

0.99

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

43 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)18

.94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)18

.45

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

44

H0

-0.1

7

t 051

952.

0

t end

(s)

5246

9.7

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

517.

6

T 016

0.4

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

46

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

23

L/R

43.4

8

K (

m/s

)1.

01E

-06

logK

-5.9

9ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.0

0406

9741

-0.3

4721

4122

t152

035.

3h1

0.63

1.30

557E

-05

0.00

3899

084

t252

040.

0h2

0.65

0.97

800.

0915

0989

4Q

(m

3 /s)

1.22

E-0

6dh

(m)

0.80

9717

0.78

9221

89K

Thi

em (m

/s)

1.55

E-0

6lo

gK-5

.81

813.

7140

833

18.3

3081

879

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

65S

tat t

ests

tig

ht

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

311.

72t1

5195

6.7

h1-0

.06

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

89.0

5t2

5212

3.7

h20.

92t-

criti

cal,

90%

1.96

Q (

m3 /s

)1.

58E

-06

dh (m

)1.

01K

Thi

em (m

/s)

1.60

E-0

6lo

gK-5

.79

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

63

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

0.1

1.0

10.051

950

5205

052

150

5225

052

350

5245

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 51

600

5180

052

000

5220

052

400

5260

052

800

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 2
et9t
et9t
41
Page 51: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

PP

2000

177.

DA

Tda

te8.

7.20

04

TOC

(m)

0.99

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

63 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)19

.94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)19

.45

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

45

H0

0.04

t 053

232.

3

t end

(s)

5350

0.0

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

267.

7

T 012

8.4

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

46

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

23

L/R

43.4

8

K (

m/s

)1.

27E

-06

logK

-5.9

0ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.0

0462

7438

-0.4

0590

2288

t153

284.

3h1

0.73

4.36

99E

-05

0.00

6759

521

t253

289.

0h2

0.76

0.90

790.

1141

6360

8Q

(m

3 /s)

1.61

E-0

6dh

(m)

0.71

1121

3.40

585

1138

KT

hiem

(m/s

)2.

33E

-06

logK

-5.6

314

6.14

8010

814

.831

9287

2K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.54

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

010

5.89

t153

237.

0h1

0.19

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

60.0

5t2

5332

1.5

h20.

89t-

criti

cal,

90%

1.96

Q (

m3 /s

)2.

26E

-06

dh (m

)0.

91K

Thi

em (m

/s)

2.53

E-0

6lo

gK-5

.60

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

50

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

0.1

1.0

10.053

200

5330

053

400

5350

053

600

5370

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 2 52

800

5300

053

200

5340

053

600

5380

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 2
et9t
42
Page 52: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

PP

2000

178.

DA

Tda

te8.

7.20

04

TOC

(m)

0.99

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

43 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)20

.94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)20

.45

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

44

H0

-0.5

0

t 054

219.

2

t end

(s)

5489

4.3

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

675.

2

T 040

3.5

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

46

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

23

L/R

43.4

8

K (

m/s

)4.

03E

-07

logK

-6.4

0ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.0

0243

8193

-0.0

1627

7167

t154

491.

9h1

0.46

7.29

897E

-07

0.00

0283

842

t254

496.

6h2

0.47

0.99

970.

0075

9263

1Q

(m

3 /s)

6.28

E-0

7dh

(m)

0.97

1115

8683

.92

2859

KT

hiem

(m/s

)6.

60E

-07

logK

-6.1

864

3.27

6326

40.

1648

1576

4K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.61

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

033

40.4

6t1

5422

3.9

h1-0

.48

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

57.3

5t2

5444

3.9

h20.

34t-

criti

cal,

90%

1.96

Q (

m3 /s

)1.

00E

-06

dh (m

)1.

51K

Thi

em (m

/s)

6.78

E-0

7lo

gK-6

.17

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

59

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

0.1

1.0

10.054

200

5440

054

600

5480

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 53

800

5400

054

200

5440

054

600

5480

055

000

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 2
et9t
43
Page 53: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

PP

2000

179.

DA

Tda

te8.

7.20

04

TOC

(m)

0.99

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

43 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)21

.94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)21

.45

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

43

H0

-0.5

6

t 055

317.

2

t end

(s)

5560

1.9

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

284.

7

T 025

471.

5

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

46

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

23

L/R

43.4

8

K (

m/s

)6.

38E

-09

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-8.2

0ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-3.9

2477

E-0

5-0

.000

3029

8t1

5540

9.1

h1-0

.55

2.98

976E

-07

4.90

669E

-05

t255

413.

8h2

-0.5

50.

9347

0.00

0854

3Q

(m

3 /s)

5.22

E-0

9dh

(m)

1.98

1723

2.84

579

1204

KT

hiem

(m/s

)2.

69E

-09

logK

-8.5

70.

0125

7703

40.

0008

7871

4K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

2.37

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

013

1.27

t155

321.

9h1

-0.5

6te

st s

tat,

b <>

06.

17t2

5541

1.5

h2-0

.55

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

2.69

E-0

8dh

(m)

1.99

KT

hiem

(m/s

)1.

38E

-08

logK

-7.8

6K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.46

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

0.1

1.0

10.055

300

5540

055

500

5560

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 55

000

5510

055

200

5530

055

400

5550

055

600

5570

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 2
et9t
44
Page 54: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

Are

a:H

ole

:M

easu

rer:

Olk

iluot

o

PP

38Je

re L

ahde

nper

ä

Wat

er le

vel b

efor

e st

artin

g 2.

57 m

(1.

7.20

04)

and

2.50

m (

2.7.

2004

)T

he r

efer

ence

leve

l to

dept

h is

top

of c

asin

g

File

Dat

eTi

me

Dep

th

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

open

bo

reho

le

(m)

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

mea

s.

sect

ion

(m)

Pou

ring

wat

er/

Mov

ing

pist

onN

OT

E!

mea

sure

men

t/hol

e &

run

mea

sure

men

t de

pth

(m)

belo

w g

roun

d le

vel

mid

poin

t of t

he

sect

ion

KH

vors

lev

(m/s

)R

2K

Thie

m

(m/s

)flo

w

KTh

iem

(m/s

)tig

ht

com

men

ts

154

1.7.

2004

14:3

03.

33.

002.

2846

0 m

lO

LPP

3800

0154

.DA

T3.

23.

90E

-09

0.94

067.

03E

-09

1.23

E-0

8T

0 no

t rea

ched

155

1.7.

2004

15:0

03.

943.

002.

9233

0 m

lO

LPP

3800

0155

.DA

T3.

844.

43E

-09

0.97

851.

52E

-08

1.05

E-0

8T

0 no

t rea

ched

156

1.7.

2004

15:2

54.

943.

002.

421.

82 m

OLP

P38

0001

56.D

AT

4.84

9.80

E-0

90.

9612

1.52

E-0

83.

31E

-08

T0

not r

each

ed

157

2.7.

2004

8:50

5.94

3.00

2.92

2.00

mO

LPP

3800

0157

.DA

T5.

841.

42E

-08

0.98

383.

17E

-08

3.69

E-0

8T

0 no

t rea

ched

158

2.7.

2004

9:25

6.94

3.00

2.92

2.00

mO

LPP

3800

0158

.DA

T6.

841.

87E

-07

0.97

692.

24E

-07

4.19

E-0

7

159

2.7.

2004

9:55

7.94

3.00

2.92

2.00

mO

LPP

3800

0159

.DA

T7.

841.

71E

-07

0.99

663.

33E

-07

3.31

E-0

7T

0 no

t rea

ched

160

2.7.

2004

10:2

58.

943.

002.

922.

00 m

OLP

P38

0001

60.D

AT

8.84

5.89

E-0

80.

9897

1.04

E-0

71.

32E

-07

T0

not r

each

ed

161

2.7.

2004

10:4

09.

943.

002.

922.

00 m

OLP

P38

0001

61.D

AT

9.84

7.92

E-0

90.

9087

1.20

E-0

82.

81E

-08

T0

not r

each

ed

et9t
APPENDIX 3
et9t
45
Page 55: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P38

0001

54.D

AT

date

1.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.6

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

28 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

28

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

28

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)3.

3

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)3.

2

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

27

H0

-1.0

7

t 053

349.

0

t end

(s)

5378

7.4

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

438.

4

T 041

662.

0

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)3.

70E

-09

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-8.4

3ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-2.3

9379

E-0

5-0

.002

6967

98t1

5349

3.3

h1-1

.05

1.38

933E

-07

3.52

076E

-05

t253

497.

9h2

-1.0

50.

9406

0.00

0762

426

Q (

m3 /s

)1.

60E

-08

dh (m

)2.

3229

686.

8844

618

76K

Thi

em (m

/s)

6.82

E-0

9lo

gK-8

.17

0.01

7256

774

0.00

1090

505

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

54S

tat t

ests

tig

ht

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

172.

30t1

5335

3.6

h1-1

.07

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

76.6

0t2

5349

5.6

h2-1

.05

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

2.81

E-0

8dh

(m)

2.33

KT

hiem

(m/s

)1.

19E

-08

logK

-7.9

2K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.31

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

0.1

1.0

10.053

300

5340

053

500

5360

053

700

5380

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-2

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 52

600

5280

053

000

5320

053

400

5360

053

800

5400

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 3
et9t
46
Page 56: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P38

0001

55.D

AT

date

1.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.6

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

47 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)3.

94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)3.

84

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

46

H0

-0.6

5

t 055

350.

0

t end

(s)

5560

0.3

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

250.

2

T 038

840.

2

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)3.

96E

-09

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-8.4

0ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-2.5

748E

-05

5.77

205E

-05

t155

429.

8h1

-0.6

51.

2699

6E-0

71.

8291

5E-0

5t2

5543

5.2

h2-0

.64

0.97

490.

0002

9867

2Q

(m

3 /s)

1.84

E-0

8dh

(m)

2.11

4110

6.05

216

1057

KT

hiem

(m/s

)8.

65E

-09

logK

-8.0

60.

0036

6685

79.

4289

5E-0

5K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.46

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

020

2.75

t155

354.

7h1

-0.6

5te

st s

tat,

b <>

03.

16t2

5543

2.1

h2-0

.64

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

1.33

E-0

8dh

(m)

2.11

KT

hiem

(m/s

)6.

26E

-09

logK

-8.2

0K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.63

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

0.1

1.0

10.055

250

5535

055

450

5555

055

650

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 54

600

5480

055

000

5520

055

400

5560

055

800

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 3
et9t
47
Page 57: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P38

0001

56.D

AT

date

1.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.6

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

62 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

42

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

24

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

84

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

62

H0

-1.2

5

t 057

000.

0

t end

(s)

5770

0.0

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

699.

9

T 018

603.

7

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)8.

28E

-09

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-8.0

8ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-5.3

539E

-05

-0.0

0397

9474

t157

230.

5h1

-1.2

07.

9769

1E-0

83.

2170

2E-0

5t2

5723

5.2

h2-1

.20

0.99

340.

0008

7940

1Q

(m

3 /s)

3.17

E-0

8dh

(m)

2.82

4504

75.1

4229

85K

Thi

em (m

/s)

1.11

E-0

8lo

gK-7

.95

0.34

8372

882

0.00

2308

436

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

74S

tat t

ests

tig

ht

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

671.

17t1

5700

5.5

h1-1

.24

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

123.

70t2

5723

2.9

h2-1

.20

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

5.65

E-0

8dh

(m)

2.85

KT

hiem

(m/s

)1.

96E

-08

logK

-7.7

1K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.42

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

0.1

1.0

10.056

900

5710

057

300

5750

057

700

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-2

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 2 56

000

5650

057

000

5750

058

000

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 3
et9t
48
Page 58: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P38

0001

57.D

AT

date

2.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.6

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

76 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)5.

94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)5.

84

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

78

H0

-1.0

8

t 033

250.

1

t end

(s)

3369

9.9

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

449.

9

T 011

225.

8

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)1.

37E

-08

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-7.8

6ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-8.8

7496

E-0

5-0

.003

7126

19t1

3339

5.9

h1-1

.03

1.78

348E

-07

4.64

246E

-05

t233

402.

1h2

-1.0

20.

9924

0.00

1014

229

Q (

m3 /s

)8.

66E

-08

dh (m

)2.

8024

7625

.408

1894

KT

hiem

(m/s

)3.

05E

-08

logK

-7.5

20.

2547

2271

0.00

1948

285

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

45S

tat t

ests

tig

ht

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

497.

62t1

3325

4.7

h1-1

.07

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

79.9

7t2

3339

8.6

h2-1

.02

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

8.68

E-0

8dh

(m)

2.83

KT

hiem

(m/s

)3.

04E

-08

logK

-7.5

2K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.45

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

0.1

1.0

10.033

200

3330

033

400

3350

033

600

3370

033

800

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-2

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 2 32

500

3300

033

500

3400

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 3
et9t
49
Page 59: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P38

0001

58.D

AT

date

2.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.6

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

78 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)6.

94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)6.

84

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

82

H0

-0.6

6

t 035

192.

8

t end

(s)

3606

3.1

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

870.

3

T 086

8.3

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)1.

77E

-07

logK

-6.7

5ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.0

0100

7456

-0.1

2524

8618

t135

726.

5h1

0.57

2.54

372E

-06

0.00

1280

175

t235

731.

1h2

0.58

0.97

690.

0388

6862

Q (

m3 /s

)2.

72E

-07

dh (m

)1.

2415

6859

.982

837

05K

Thi

em (m

/s)

2.17

E-0

7lo

gK-6

.66

236.

9793

015.

5974

0154

6K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.82

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

039

6.06

t135

197.

5h1

-0.6

3te

st s

tat,

b <>

097

.84

t235

484.

9h2

0.24

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

8.25

E-0

7dh

(m)

2.01

KT

hiem

(m/s

)4.

06E

-07

logK

-6.3

9K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.44

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

0.1

1.0

10.035

150

3535

035

550

3575

035

950

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 2 34

500

3500

035

500

3600

036

500

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 3
et9t
50
Page 60: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P38

0001

59.D

AT

date

2.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.6

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

96 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)7.

94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)7.

84

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

97

H0

-0.7

1

t 036

970.

6

t end

(s)

3751

7.2

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

546.

7

T 094

9.8

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)1.

62E

-07

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-6.7

9ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.0

0102

5719

-0.0

2576

5011

t137

149.

9h1

-0.1

91.

2429

1E-0

60.

0003

9281

8t2

3715

4.5

h2-0

.17

0.99

660.

0094

4283

6Q

(m

3 /s)

7.03

E-0

7dh

(m)

2.15

6810

53.1

681

2311

KT

hiem

(m/s

)3.

23E

-07

logK

-6.4

960

.727

5687

70.

2060

6527

9K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.50

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

082

5.26

t136

975.

3h1

-0.6

9te

st s

tat,

b <>

065

.59

t237

152.

2h2

-0.1

8t-

criti

cal,

90%

1.96

Q (

m3 /s

)7.

81E

-07

dh (m

)2.

41K

Thi

em (m

/s)

3.21

E-0

7lo

gK-6

.49

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

51

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

0.1

1.0

10.036

950

3705

037

150

3725

037

350

3745

037

550

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 2 36

000

3650

037

000

3750

038

000

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 3
et9t
et9t
51
Page 61: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P38

0001

60.D

AT

date

2.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.6

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

97 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)8.

94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)8.

84

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

99

H0

-0.7

2

t 038

450.

0

t end

(s)

3870

0.1

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

250.

1

T 031

28.6

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)4.

92E

-08

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-7.3

1ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.0

0031

8866

-0.0

0239

2158

t138

530.

2h1

-0.6

44.

4408

4E-0

76.

3735

5E-0

5t2

3853

4.8

h2-0

.64

0.99

800.

0010

3493

7Q

(m

3 /s)

2.49

E-0

7dh

(m)

2.63

5155

66.7

879

1045

KT

hiem

(m/s

)9.

38E

-08

logK

-7.0

30.

5522

2072

80.

0011

1929

4K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.52

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

071

8.03

t138

454.

7h1

-0.7

1te

st s

tat,

b <>

037

.53

t238

532.

5h2

-0.6

4t-

criti

cal,

90%

1.96

Q (

m3 /s

)2.

64E

-07

dh (m

)2.

66K

Thi

em (m

/s)

9.81

E-0

8lo

gK-7

.01

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

50

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

0.1

1.0

10.038

350

3845

038

550

3865

038

750

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 2 37

800

3800

038

200

3840

038

600

3880

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 3
et9t
52
Page 62: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P38

0001

61.D

AT

date

2.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.6

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)2.

39 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)9.

94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)9.

84

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H1.

95

H0

-0.7

8

t 039

349.

9

t end

(s)

3960

0.0

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

250.

1

T 025

619.

4

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)6.

01E

-09

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-8.2

2ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-3.8

9851

E-0

5-0

.001

2270

97t1

3942

9.7

h1-0

.77

2.91

546E

-07

4.23

998E

-05

t239

434.

8h2

-0.7

70.

9452

0.00

0685

774

Q (

m3 /s

)2.

85E

-08

dh (m

)2.

7217

880.

6345

810

37K

Thi

em (m

/s)

1.04

E-0

8lo

gK-7

.98

0.00

8409

020.

0004

8768

7K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.58

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

013

3.72

t139

354.

6h1

-0.7

8te

st s

tat,

b <>

028

.94

t239

432.

2h2

-0.7

7t-

criti

cal,

90%

1.96

Q (

m3 /s

)3.

64E

-08

dh (m

)2.

72K

Thi

em (m

/s)

1.32

E-0

8lo

gK-7

.88

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

45

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

0.1

1.0

10.039

250

3935

039

450

3955

039

650

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 2

2.5 39

000

3920

039

400

3960

039

800

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 3
et9t
53
et9t
53
Page 63: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base
et9t
54
Page 64: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

Are

a:H

ole

:M

easu

rer:

Olk

iluot

o

PP

39Je

re L

ahde

nper

ä

Wat

er le

vel b

efor

e st

artin

g 1.

20 m

The

ref

eren

ce le

vel t

o de

pth

is to

p of

cas

ing

File

Dat

eTi

me

Dep

th

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

open

bo

reho

le

(m)

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

mea

s.

sect

ion

(m)

Pou

ring

wat

er/

Mov

ing

pist

onN

OT

E!

mea

sure

men

t/hol

e &

run

mea

sure

men

t de

pth

(m)

belo

w g

roun

d le

vel

mid

poin

t of t

he

sect

ion

KH

vors

lev

(m/s

)R

2K

Thie

m

(m/s

)flo

w

KTh

iem

(m/s

)tig

ht

com

men

ts

162

6.7.

2004

13:5

14.

43.

001.

572.

00 m

OLP

P39

0001

62.D

AT

4.4

2.09

E-0

90.

3447

1.11

E-0

81.

53E

-08

T0

not r

each

ed

163

6.7.

2004

14:1

24.

923.

002.

921.

34 m

OLP

P39

0001

63.D

AT

4.92

6.17

E-0

80.

8868

1.30

E-0

71.

47E

-07

T0

not r

each

ed

164

6.7.

2004

14:3

45.

923.

002.

922.

00 m

OLP

P39

0001

64.D

AT

5.92

2.74

E-0

80.

9605

8.90

E-0

89.

47E

-08

T0

not r

each

ed

165

6.7.

2004

15:0

26.

943.

002.

922.

00 m

OLP

P39

0001

65.D

AT

6.94

4.58

E-0

60.

9997

7.62

E-0

67.

56E

-06

166

6.7.

2004

15:2

07.

943.

002.

922.

00 m

OLP

P39

0001

66.D

AT

7.94

4.34

E-0

60.

9985

7.18

E-0

67.

19E

-06

167

6.7.

2004

15:4

08.

943.

002.

922.

00 m

OLP

P39

0001

67.D

AT

8.94

6.23

E-0

90.

7869

6.31

E-0

92.

69E

-08

T0

not r

each

ed

168

6.7.

2004

15:5

69.

943.

002.

922.

00 m

OLP

P39

0001

68.D

AT

9.94

2.42

E-0

80.

8462

6.04

E-0

89.

65E

-08

T0

not r

each

ed

169

6.7.

2004

16:1

510

.94

3.00

2.92

2.00

mO

LPP

3900

0169

.DA

T10

.94

1.59

E-1

00.

0091

1.22

E-0

84.

34E

-09

T0

not r

each

ed

170

6.7.

2004

16:2

811

.94

3.00

2.92

2.00

mO

LPP

3900

0170

.DA

T11

.94

3.71

E-0

90.

6945

1.41

E-0

81.

39E

-08

T0

not r

each

ed

et9t
APPENDIX 4
et9t
55
Page 65: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P39

0001

62.D

AT

date

6.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.5

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)1.

11 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1.

57

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)3.

57

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

4

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

4

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H0.

70

H0

-1.8

5

t 050

399.

9

t end

(s)

5059

9.9

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

200.

0

T 013

6902

.4

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)1.

12E

-09

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-8.9

5ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-7.3

0128

E-0

6-0

.000

4376

73t1

5046

3.9

h1-1

.85

2.54

03E

-07

2.91

451E

-05

t250

468.

5h2

-1.8

50.

4961

0.00

0423

762

Q (

m3 /s

)-1

.59E

-08

dh (m

)2.

5482

6.09

1611

983

9K

Thi

em (m

/s)

-6.1

8E-0

9lo

gK#N

UM

!0.

0001

4834

50.

0001

5066

3K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

-0.1

8S

tat t

ests

tig

ht

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

28.7

4t1

5040

4.6

h1-1

.85

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

15.0

2t2

5046

6.2

h2-1

.85

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

8.78

E-0

9dh

(m)

2.54

KT

hiem

(m/s

)3.

41E

-09

logK

-8.4

7K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.33

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

0.1

1.0

10.050

300

5040

050

500

5060

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-2.5 -2

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 49

800

5000

050

200

5040

050

600

5080

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 4
et9t
56
Page 66: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P39

0001

63.D

AT

date

6.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.5

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)0.

75 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H0.

74

H0

-0.6

2

t 051

571.

9

t end

(s)

5198

5.9

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

414.

0

T 026

34.2

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)5.

84E

-08

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-7.2

3ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.0

0043

5183

0.14

6347

038

t151

708.

1h1

-0.7

43.

7099

3E-0

60.

0008

8785

2t2

5171

2.7

h2-0

.74

0.88

680.

0185

9775

4Q

(m

3 /s)

1.90

E-0

7dh

(m)

1.48

1375

9.75

171

1757

KT

hiem

(m/s

)1.

26E

-07

logK

-6.9

04.

7591

7417

0.60

7704

935

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

46S

tat t

ests

tig

ht

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

117.

30t1

5157

6.6

h1-0

.85

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

164.

83t2

5171

0.4

h2-0

.74

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

2.21

E-0

7dh

(m)

1.54

KT

hiem

(m/s

)1.

42E

-07

logK

-6.8

5K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.41

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

0.1

1.0

10.051

550

5165

051

750

5185

051

950

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1 51

000

5120

051

400

5160

051

800

5200

052

200

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 4
et9t
57
Page 67: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P39

0001

64.D

AT

date

6.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.5

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)0.

73 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)5.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)5.

92

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H0.

73

H0

-1.5

1

t 052

850.

1

t end

(s)

5360

0.0

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

750.

0

T 036

55.5

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)4.

21E

-08

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-7.3

8ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.0

0027

1008

-0.0

0932

9477

t153

098.

0h1

-1.3

42.

1382

5E-0

79.

2538

3E-0

5t2

5310

2.7

h2-1

.34

0.99

800.

0026

0433

6Q

(m

3 /s)

1.84

E-0

7dh

(m)

2.07

1606

372.

193

3175

KT

hiem

(m/s

)8.

82E

-08

logK

-7.0

510

.895

3219

0.02

1534

64K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.48

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

012

67.4

3t1

5285

4.8

h1-1

.51

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

100.

82t2

5310

0.3

h2-1

.34

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

1.83

E-0

7dh

(m)

2.15

KT

hiem

(m/s

)8.

40E

-08

logK

-7.0

8K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.50

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

0.1

1.0

10.052

800

5300

053

200

5340

053

600

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2 0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8 1 52

000

5250

053

000

5350

054

000

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 4
et9t
58
Page 68: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P39

0001

65.D

AT

date

6.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.5

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)0.

72 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)6.

94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)6.

94

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H0.

71

H0

-0.6

9

t 054

408.

6

t end

(s)

5449

1.9

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

83.3

T 035

.4

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)4.

35E

-06

logK

-5.3

6ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.0

2699

7335

-0.0

4348

3488

t154

429.

8h1

-0.0

42.

6156

7E-0

50.

0012

5988

t254

434.

5h2

0.05

0.99

970.

0118

899

Q (

m3 /s

)5.

26E

-06

dh (m

)0.

7110

6530

8.94

935

3K

Thi

em (m

/s)

7.39

E-0

6lo

gK-5

.13

150.

6024

367

0.04

9903

514

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

59S

tat t

ests

tig

ht

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

1032

.14

t154

413.

3h1

-0.5

0te

st s

tat,

b <>

034

.51

t254

436.

4h2

0.08

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

97Q

(m

3 /s)

6.79

E-0

6dh

(m)

0.92

KT

hiem

(m/s

)7.

33E

-06

logK

-5.1

4K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.59

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

0.1

1.0

10.054

400

5442

054

440

5446

054

480

5450

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1 54

000

5420

054

400

5460

054

800

5500

055

200

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 4
et9t
59
Page 69: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P39

0001

66.D

AT

date

6.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.5

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)0.

76 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)7.

94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)7.

94

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H0.

75

H0

-0.6

7

t 055

454.

2

t end

(s)

5554

6.2

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

92.0

T 037

.5

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)4.

11E

-06

logK

-5.3

9ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-0.0

2471

2798

-0.0

7420

2207

t155

476.

4h1

-0.0

14.

8630

7E-0

50.

0025

8514

7t2

5548

1.1

h20.

080.

9985

0.02

5636

459

Q (

m3 /s

)5.

03E

-06

dh (m

)0.

7225

8239

.424

839

0K

Thi

em (m

/s)

6.96

E-0

6lo

gK-5

.16

169.

7221

935

0.25

6318

939

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

59S

tat t

ests

tig

ht

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

508.

17t1

5545

8.9

h1-0

.48

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

28.7

0t2

5548

4.8

h20.

14t-

criti

cal,

90%

1.97

Q (

m3 /s

)6.

47E

-06

dh (m

)0.

92K

Thi

em (m

/s)

6.97

E-0

6lo

gK-5

.16

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

59

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

0.1

1.0

10.055

450

5547

055

490

5551

055

530

5555

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1 55

200

5530

055

400

5550

055

600

5570

055

800

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 4
et9t
60
Page 70: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P39

0001

67.D

AT

date

6.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.5

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)0.

70 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)8.

94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)8.

94

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H0.

65

H0

-1.5

2

t 056

849.

9

t end

(s)

5704

9.9

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

199.

9

T 044

819.

3

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)3.

43E

-09

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-8.4

6ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-2.2

3107

E-0

5-5

.128

62E

-05

t156

913.

4h1

-1.5

13.

6492

1E-0

74.

2009

4E-0

5t2

5691

8.1

h2-1

.51

0.81

580.

0006

1373

3Q

(m

3 /s)

1.04

E-0

8dh

(m)

2.16

3737

.882

284

844

KT

hiem

(m/s

)4.

78E

-09

logK

-8.3

20.

0014

0793

90.

0003

1790

8K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.72

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

061

.14

t156

854.

6h1

-1.5

2te

st s

tat,

b <>

01.

22t2

5691

5.7

h2-1

.51

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

1.77

E-0

8dh

(m)

2.16

KT

hiem

(m/s

)8.

10E

-09

logK

-8.0

9K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.42

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

0.1

1.0

10.056

700

5680

056

900

5700

057

100

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-2

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1 56

400

5660

056

800

5700

057

200

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 4
et9t
61
Page 71: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P39

0001

68.D

AT

date

6.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.5

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)0.

72 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)9.

94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)9.

94

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H0.

71

H0

-1.3

9

t 057

899.

9

t end

(s)

5820

0.1

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

300.

1

T 015

954.

8

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)9.

65E

-09

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-8.0

2ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-6.2

5337

E-0

5-0

.002

2901

14t1

5799

7.3

h1-1

.37

2.83

857E

-07

4.90

461E

-05

t258

002.

0h2

-1.3

70.

9745

0.00

0875

737

Q (

m3 /s

)4.

71E

-08

dh (m

)2.

0848

532.

0769

612

71K

Thi

em (m

/s)

2.24

E-0

8lo

gK-7

.65

0.03

7219

958

0.00

0974

748

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

43S

tat t

ests

tig

ht

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

220.

30t1

5790

4.6

h1-1

.38

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

46.6

9t2

5799

9.6

h2-1

.37

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

5.28

E-0

8dh

(m)

2.09

KT

hiem

(m/s

)2.

50E

-08

logK

-7.6

0K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.39

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

0.1

1.0

10.057

650

5775

057

850

5795

058

050

5815

058

250

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-2.5 -2

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1 57

200

5740

057

600

5780

058

000

5820

058

400

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 4
et9t
62
Page 72: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P39

0001

69.D

AT

date

6.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.5

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)0.

72 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)10

.94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)10

.94

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H0.

72

H0

-1.5

1

t 058

799.

9

t end

(s)

5900

0.0

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

200.

1

T 0-7

9135

09.4

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)-1

.95E

-11

logK

#NU

M!

ln((

H-h

)/(H

-H0)

) = a

*t +

bT

hiem

ana

lysi

s fo

r con

trol

ab

flo

w1.

2630

9E-0

7-0

.000

4513

78t1

5886

4.5

h1-1

.51

2.21

549E

-07

2.56

418E

-05

t258

869.

2h2

-1.5

10.

0004

0.00

0372

06Q

(m

3 /s)

-2.0

9E-0

8dh

(m)

2.23

0.32

5035

308

845

KT

hiem

(m/s

)-9

.30E

-09

logK

#NU

M!

4.49

942E

-08

0.00

0116

972

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

0.

00S

tat t

ests

tig

ht

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

0.57

t158

804.

6h1

-1.5

1te

st s

tat,

b <>

017

.60

t258

866.

9h2

-1.5

1t-

criti

cal,

90%

1.96

Q (

m3 /s

)5.

14E

-09

dh (m

)2.

23K

Thi

em (m

/s)

2.28

E-0

9lo

gK-8

.64

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

-0

.01

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

0.1

1.0

10.058

750

5885

058

950

5905

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-2

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1 58

500

5860

058

700

5880

058

900

5900

059

100

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 4
et9t
63
Page 73: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OLP

P39

0001

70.D

AT

date

6.7.

2004

TOC

(m)

0.5

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

ope

n ho

le (m

)3

ref

toc

min

ope

n bo

re-

hole

pre

ssur

e (m

)0.

74 r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

92

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

92

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)11

.94

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)11

.94

tube

dia

met

er (m

m)

18.5

6

r (m

m)

9.28

H0.

74

H0

-1.5

3

t 059

650.

0

t end

(s)

5980

0.0

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

150.

0

T 060

038.

3

L (m

)1

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en ra

dius

R (m

m)

28

L/R

35.7

1

K (

m/s

)2.

56E

-09

T0

no

t re

ach

ed

logK

-8.5

9ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

a*t

+ b

Thi

em a

naly

sis

for c

ontro

la

bfl

ow

-1.6

657E

-05

5.84

739E

-05

t159

697.

3h1

-1.5

33.

4298

9E-0

72.

9744

3E-0

5t2

5970

2.0

h2-1

.53

0.78

870.

0003

7581

9Q

(m

3 /s)

-1.0

4E-0

8dh

(m)

2.27

2358

.492

523

632

KT

hiem

(m/s

)-4

.54E

-09

logK

#NU

M!

0.00

0333

113

8.92

635E

-05

KH

vors

lev /

KT

hiem

-0

.56

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

tte

st s

tat,

a <>

048

.56

t159

654.

7h1

-1.5

3te

st s

tat,

b <>

01.

97t2

5969

9.6

h2-1

.53

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

1.81

E-0

8dh

(m)

2.27

KT

hiem

(m/s

)7.

86E

-09

logK

-8.1

0K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.33

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/(

H-H

0)) =

-1

leng

th o

f mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for i

nter

pret

atio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref g

roun

d le

vel

wat

er le

vel a

t the

mea

sure

men

t sec

tion

afte

r d

istu

rban

ce, r

ef g

roun

d le

vel

tim

e of

dis

turb

ance

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

2

4.9

mm

and

inne

r dia

m 1

6.6

mm

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref T

OC

, top

ref g

roun

d le

vel,

mid

poin

t of t

he s

ectio

n

0.1

1.0

10.059

500

5960

059

700

5980

059

900

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-2

-1.5 -1

-0.5 0

0.5 1 59

300

5940

059

500

5960

059

700

5980

059

900

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Ope

n bo

reho

leM

easu

rem

ent S

ectio

n

PH

/Fin

tact

31.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 4
et9t
64
Page 74: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

Are

a:H

ole

:M

easu

rer:

Olk

iluot

o

PV

P2

Jere

Lah

denp

erä

Wat

er le

vel b

efor

e st

artin

g 0.

53 m

The

ref

eren

ce le

vel t

o de

pth

is to

p of

cas

ing

File

Dat

eTi

me

Dep

th

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

open

bo

reho

le

(m)

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

mea

s.

sect

ion

(m)

Pou

ring

wat

er/

Mov

ing

pist

onN

OT

E!

mea

sure

men

t/hol

e &

run

mea

sure

men

t de

pth

(m)

belo

w g

roun

d le

vel

mid

poin

t of t

he

sect

ion

KH

vors

lev

(m/s

)R

2K

Thie

m

(m/s

)flo

w

KTh

iem

(m/s

)tig

ht

com

men

ts

190

12.1

.200

513

:22

0no

t in

use

1.5

1.50

mO

LPV

P20

0019

0.D

AT

11.

27E

-06

0.99

861.

54E

-06

1.88

E-0

6T

0 no

t rea

ched

191

12.1

.200

513

:26

0no

t in

use

1.5

1.50

mO

LPV

P20

0019

1.D

AT

19.

27E

-07

0.99

381.

83E

-06

1.49

E-0

6T

0 no

t rea

ched

et9t
APPENDIX 5
et9t
65
Page 75: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OL

PV

P20

0019

0.D

AT

date

12.1

.200

5

TO

C (

m)

0.4 0

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1.

5

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)3

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)0

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1

tube

dia

met

er (

mm

)39

.19

r (m

m)

19.6

0H

0.07

H0

-0.0

780

t 044

394.

63

t end

(s)

4452

1.41

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

126.

78

T0

321.

85

L (m

)2

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en r

adiu

s R

(m

m)

28

L/R

71.4

3

K (

m/s

)1.

2732

5E-0

6T

0 n

ot

reac

hed

logK

-5.9

0

ln((

H-h

)/(H

-H0)

) =

a*t +

bT

hiem

ana

lysi

s fo

r co

ntro

l

ab

flo

w

-0.0

0310

5409

-0.0

0052

439

t144

435.

59h1

-0.0

60

3.63

146E

-06

0.00

0265

676

t244

438

h2-0

.059

0.99

8566

191

0.00

4313

245

Q (

m3 /s

)4.

10E

-07

dh (

m)

0.13

7312

65.3

385

1050

KT

hiem

(m

/s)

1.54

E-0

6lo

gK-5

.81

13.6

0452

083

0.01

9534

287

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

83

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

t

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

855.

14t1

4439

7.03

h1-0

.077

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

1.97

t244

436.

8h2

-0.0

59

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

5.35

E-0

7dh

(m

)0.

14K

Thi

em (

m/s

)1.

88E

-06

logK

-5.7

3

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

68

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref

gro

und

leve

l, to

p

ref

gro

und

leve

l, m

idpo

int o

f the

sec

tion

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref

gro

und

leve

l w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n af

ter

dis

turb

ance

, ref

gro

und

leve

l ti

me

of d

istu

rban

ce

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

56

mm

and

inne

r di

am 4

0 m

m

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/

(H-H

0))

= -1

le

ngth

of m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for

inte

rpre

tatio

n

0.1

1.0

10.044

350

4440

044

450

4450

044

550

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2 0

0.2

0.4 44

300

4435

044

400

4445

044

500

4455

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Mea

sure

men

t Sec

tion

PH

/Fin

tact

20.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 5
et9t
66
Page 76: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OL

PV

P20

0019

1.D

AT

date

12.1

.200

5

TO

C (

m)

0.4 0

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1.

5

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)3

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)0

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1

tube

dia

met

er (

mm

)39

.19

r (m

m)

19.6

0H

0.11

H0

-0.0

340

t 044

674.

13

t end

(s)

4478

3.55

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

109.

42

T0

442.

27

L (m

)2

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en r

adiu

s R

(m

m)

28

L/R

71.4

3

K (

m/s

)9.

2657

E-0

7T

0 n

ot

reac

hed

logK

-6.0

3

ln((

H-h

)/(H

-H0)

) =

a*t +

bT

hiem

ana

lysi

s fo

r co

ntro

l

ab

flo

w

-0.0

0223

0262

-0.0

1362

0219

t144

709.

22h1

-0.0

21

5.83

72E

-06

0.00

0368

532

t244

711.

63h2

-0.0

20

0.99

3845

618

0.00

5557

41Q

(m

3 /s)

5.01

E-0

7dh

(m

)0.

14

1459

83.2

057

904

KT

hiem

(m

/s)

1.83

E-0

6lo

gK-5

.74

4.50

8663

450.

0279

1986

7K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.51

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

t

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

382.

08t1

4467

6.53

h1-0

.032

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

36.9

6t2

4471

0.42

h2-0

.020

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

4.24

E-0

7dh

(m

)0.

14K

Thi

em (

m/s

)1.

49E

-06

logK

-5.8

3

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

62

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref

gro

und

leve

l, to

p

ref

gro

und

leve

l, m

idpo

int o

f the

sec

tion

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref

gro

und

leve

l w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n af

ter

dis

turb

ance

, ref

gro

und

leve

l ti

me

of d

istu

rban

ce

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

56

mm

and

inne

r di

am 4

0 m

m

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/

(H-H

0))

= -1

le

ngth

of m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for

inte

rpre

tatio

n

0.1

1.0

10.044

650

4470

044

750

4480

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2 0

0.2

0.4 44

550

4460

044

650

4470

044

750

4480

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Mea

sure

men

t Sec

tion

PH

/Fin

tact

20.

5.20

05

et9t
APPENDIX 5
et9t
67
Page 77: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base
et9t
68
Page 78: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

Are

a:H

ole

:M

easu

rer:

Olk

iluot

o

PV

P4A

Jere

Lah

denp

erä

Wat

er le

vel b

efor

e st

artin

g 1.

41 m

The

ref

eren

ce le

vel t

o de

pth

is to

p of

cas

ing

File

Dat

eTi

me

Dep

th

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

open

bo

reho

le

(m)

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

mea

s.

sect

ion

(m)

Pou

ring

wat

er/

Mov

ing

pist

onN

OT

E!

mea

sure

men

t/hol

e &

run

mea

sure

men

t de

pth

(m)

belo

w g

roun

d le

vel

mid

poin

t of t

he

sect

ion

KH

vors

lev

(m/s

)R

2K

Thie

m

(m/s

)flo

w

KTh

iem

(m/s

)tig

ht

com

men

ts

152

30.6

.200

415

:35

0no

t in

use

1.5

1.50

mO

LPV

4A00

152.

DA

T1

1.36

E-0

50.

9901

1.99

E-0

51.

96E

-05

et9t
APPENDIX 6
et9t
69
Page 79: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OL

PV

4A00

0152

.DA

Tda

te30

.6.2

004

TO

C (

m)

0.7 0

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1.

5

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)3

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)0

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1

tube

dia

met

er (

mm

)39

.19

r (m

m)

19.6

0H

0.71

H0

-0.3

770

t 056

020.

69

t end

(s)

5610

3.13

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

82.4

4

T0

30.1

5

L (m

)2

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en r

adiu

s R

(m

m)

28

L/R

71.4

3

K (

m/s

)1.

3591

8E-0

5

logK

-4.8

7

ln((

H-h

)/(H

-H0)

) =

a*t +

bT

hiem

ana

lysi

s fo

r co

ntro

l

ab

flo

w

-0.0

2713

6546

-0.1

8182

8539

t156

037.

68h1

0.14

3

0.00

0104

027

0.00

4955

275

t256

040.

12h2

0.18

7

0.99

0120

393

0.06

4707

62Q

(m

3 /s)

2.19

E-0

5dh

(m

)0.

55

6804

8.42

708

679

KT

hiem

(m

/s)

1.99

E-0

5lo

gK-4

.70

284.

9239

456

2.84

3024

701

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

68

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

t

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

260.

86t1

5602

3.14

h1-0

.264

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

36.6

9t2

5604

8.13

h20.

304

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

2.74

E-0

5dh

(m

)0.

69K

Thi

em (

m/s

)1.

96E

-05

logK

-4.7

1

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

69

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref

gro

und

leve

l, to

p

ref

gro

und

leve

l, m

idpo

int o

f the

sec

tion

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref

gro

und

leve

l w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n af

ter

dis

turb

ance

, ref

gro

und

leve

l ti

me

of d

istu

rban

ce

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

56

mm

and

inne

r di

am 4

0 m

m

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/

(H-H

0))

= -1

le

ngth

of m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for

inte

rpre

tatio

n

0.1

1.0

10.056

000

5605

056

100

5615

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1-0

.8-0

.6-0

.4-0

.2 00.

20.

40.

60.

8 1 5580

055

900

5600

056

100

5620

056

300

5640

056

500

5660

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Mea

sure

men

t Sec

tion

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 6
et9t
70
Page 80: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

Are

a:H

ole

:M

easu

rer:

Olk

iluot

o

PV

P4B

Jere

Lah

denp

erä

Wat

er le

vel b

efor

e st

artin

g 1.

62 m

The

ref

eren

ce le

vel t

o de

pth

is to

p of

cas

ing

File

Dat

eTi

me

Dep

th

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

open

bo

reho

le

(m)

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

mea

s.

sect

ion

(m)

Pou

ring

wat

er/

Mov

ing

pist

onN

OT

E!

mea

sure

men

t/hol

e &

run

mea

sure

men

t de

pth

(m)

belo

w g

roun

d le

vel

mid

poin

t of t

he

sect

ion

KH

vors

lev

(m/s

)R

2K

Thie

m

(m/s

)flo

w

KTh

iem

(m/s

)tig

ht

com

men

ts

153

30.6

.200

416

:00

0no

t in

use

1.7

1.50

mO

LPV

4B00

0153

.DA

T1

3.06

E-0

60.

9988

3.72

E-0

64.

39E

-06

et9t
APPENDIX 7
et9t
71
Page 81: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OL

PV

4B00

0153

.DA

Tda

te30

.6.2

004

TO

C (

m)

0.86 0

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1.

7

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)3.

2

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)0

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1

tube

dia

met

er (

mm

)39

.19

r (m

m)

19.6

0H

0.78

H0

-0.2

290

t 057

330.

25

t end

(s)

5766

0.44

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

330.

19

T0

134.

10

L (m

)2

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en r

adiu

s R

(m

m)

28

L/R

71.4

3

K (

m/s

)3.

0558

2E-0

6

logK

-5.5

1

ln((

H-h

)/(H

-H0)

) =

a*t +

bT

hiem

ana

lysi

s fo

r co

ntro

l

ab

flo

w

-0.0

0661

9251

-0.1

1233

8131

t157

413.

36h1

0.27

0

4.41

217E

-06

0.00

0841

64t2

5741

5.74

h20.

278

0.99

8771

661

0.02

2193

483

Q (

m3 /s

)3.

78E

-06

dh (

m)

0.50

2250

682.

344

2768

KT

hiem

(m

/s)

3.72

E-0

6lo

gK-5

.43

1108

.575

142

1.36

3380

311

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

82

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

t

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

1500

.23

t157

332.

62h1

-0.2

01

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

133.

48t2

5743

9.68

h20.

351

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

6.22

E-0

6dh

(m

)0.

70K

Thi

em (

m/s

)4.

39E

-06

logK

-5.3

6

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

70

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref

gro

und

leve

l, to

p

ref

gro

und

leve

l, m

idpo

int o

f the

sec

tion

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref

gro

und

leve

l w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n af

ter

dis

turb

ance

, ref

gro

und

leve

l ti

me

of d

istu

rban

ce

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

56

mm

and

inne

r di

am 4

0 m

m

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/

(H-H

0))

= -1

le

ngth

of m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for

inte

rpre

tatio

n

0.1

1.0

10.057

300

5740

057

500

5760

057

700

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1-0

.8-0

.6-0

.4-0

.2 00.

20.

40.

60.

8 1 5700

057

200

5740

057

600

5780

058

000

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Mea

sure

men

t Sec

tion

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 7
et9t
72
Page 82: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

Are

a:H

ole

:M

easu

rer:

Olk

iluot

o

PV

P11

Jere

Lah

denp

erä

Wat

er le

vel b

efor

e st

artin

g 0.

99 m

The

ref

eren

ce le

vel t

o de

pth

is to

p of

cas

ing

File

Dat

eTi

me

Dep

th

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

open

bo

reho

le

(m)

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

mea

s.

sect

ion

(m)

Pou

ring

wat

er/

Mov

ing

pist

onN

OT

E!

mea

sure

men

t/hol

e &

run

mea

sure

men

t de

pth

(m)

belo

w g

roun

d le

vel

mid

poin

t of t

he

sect

ion

KH

vors

lev

(m/s

)R

2K

Thie

m

(m/s

)flo

w

KTh

iem

(m/s

)tig

ht

com

men

ts

187

9.12

.200

414

:49

0no

t in

use

1.1

1.50

mO

LPV

1100

0187

.DA

T1

6.22

E-0

50.

9989

8.92

E-0

58.

81E

-05

188

9.12

.200

414

:56

0no

t in

use

1.1

1.50

mO

LPV

1100

0188

.DA

T1

5.24

E-0

50.

9994

7.52

E-0

57.

61E

-05

et9t
APPENDIX 8
et9t
73
Page 83: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OL

PV

1100

0187

.DA

Tda

te9.

12.2

004

TO

C (

m)

0.6 0

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1.

1

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

6

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)0

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1

tube

dia

met

er (

mm

)39

.19

r (m

m)

19.6

0H

0.38

H0

-0.1

050

t 053

470.

23

t end

(s)

5348

4.39

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

14.1

6

T0

6.58

L (m

)2

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en r

adiu

s R

(m

m)

28

L/R

71.4

3

K (

m/s

)6.

2235

E-0

5

logK

-4.2

1

ln((

H-h

)/(H

-H0)

) =

a*t +

bT

hiem

ana

lysi

s fo

r co

ntro

l

ab

flo

w

-0.1

5853

0077

0.04

3863

425

t153

473.

73h1

0.08

7

0.00

0490

795

0.00

4011

156

t253

476.

14h2

0.17

6

0.99

8889

412

0.02

1915

798

Q (

m3 /s

)4.

45E

-05

dh (

m)

0.25

1043

33.1

762

116

KT

hiem

(m

/s)

8.92

E-0

5lo

gK-4

.05

50.1

1145

210.

0557

1505

3K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.70

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

t

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

323.

01t1

5347

2.65

h10.

037

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

10.9

4t2

5347

4.94

h20.

135

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

98Q

(m

3 /s)

5.21

E-0

5dh

(m

)0.

29K

Thi

em (

m/s

)8.

81E

-05

logK

-4.0

6

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

71

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref

gro

und

leve

l, to

p

ref

gro

und

leve

l, m

idpo

int o

f the

sec

tion

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref

gro

und

leve

l w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n af

ter

dis

turb

ance

, ref

gro

und

leve

l ti

me

of d

istu

rban

ce

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

56

mm

and

inne

r di

am 4

0 m

m

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/

(H-H

0))

= -1

le

ngth

of m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for

inte

rpre

tatio

n

0.1

1.0

10.053

450

5346

053

470

5348

053

490

5350

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2 0

0.2

0.4 53

300

5335

053

400

5345

053

500

5355

053

600

5365

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Mea

sure

men

t Sec

tion

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 8
et9t
74
Page 84: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OL

PV

1100

0188

.DA

Tda

te9.

12.2

004

TO

C (

m)

0.6 0

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1.

1

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

6

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)0

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1

tube

dia

met

er (

mm

)39

.19

r (m

m)

19.6

0H

0.40

H0

-0.2

100

t 053

848.

79

t end

(s)

5386

7.25

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

18.4

6

T0

7.82

L (m

)2

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en r

adiu

s R

(m

m)

28

L/R

71.4

3

K (

m/s

)5.

2435

3E-0

5

logK

-4.2

8

ln((

H-h

)/(H

-H0)

) =

a*t +

bT

hiem

ana

lysi

s fo

r co

ntro

l

ab

flo

w

-0.1

2144

4388

-0.0

5088

0858

t153

852.

57h1

0.03

6

0.00

0241

849

0.00

2598

179

t253

855.

05h2

0.13

3

0.99

9405

480.

0159

4203

3Q

(m

3 /s)

4.74

E-0

5dh

(m

)0.

31

2521

54.4

6815

0K

Thi

em (

m/s

)7.

52E

-05

logK

-4.1

2

64.0

8465

650.

0381

2226

1K

Hvo

rsle

v / K

Thi

em

0.70

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

t

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

502.

15t1

5385

1.32

h1-0

.031

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

19.5

8t2

5385

5.05

h20.

133

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

98Q

(m

3 /s)

5.31

E-0

5dh

(m

)0.

35K

Thi

em (

m/s

)7.

61E

-05

logK

-4.1

2

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

69

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref

gro

und

leve

l, to

p

ref

gro

und

leve

l, m

idpo

int o

f the

sec

tion

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref

gro

und

leve

l w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n af

ter

dis

turb

ance

, ref

gro

und

leve

l ti

me

of d

istu

rban

ce

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

56

mm

and

inne

r di

am 4

0 m

m

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/

(H-H

0))

= -1

le

ngth

of m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for

inte

rpre

tatio

n

0.1

1.0

10.053

800

5382

053

840

5386

053

880

5390

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2 0

0.2

0.4 53

750

5380

053

850

5390

053

950

5400

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Mea

sure

men

t Sec

tion

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 8
et9t
75
Page 85: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base
et9t
76
Page 86: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

Are

a:H

ole

:M

easu

rer:

Olk

iluot

o

PV

P12

Jere

Lah

denp

erä

Wat

er le

vel b

efor

e st

artin

g 1.

80 m

The

ref

eren

ce le

vel t

o de

pth

is to

p of

cas

ing

File

Dat

eTi

me

Dep

th

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

open

bo

reho

le

(m)

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

mea

s.

sect

ion

(m)

Pou

ring

wat

er/

Mov

ing

pist

onN

OT

E!

mea

sure

men

t/hol

e &

run

mea

sure

men

t de

pth

(m)

belo

w g

roun

d le

vel

mid

poin

t of t

he

sect

ion

KH

vors

lev

(m/s

)R

2K

Thie

m

(m/s

)flo

w

KTh

iem

(m/s

)tig

ht

com

men

ts

189

9.12

.200

415

:32

0no

t in

use

1.9

1.50

mO

LPV

1200

0189

.DA

T1

1.84

E-0

60.

9090

1.72

E-0

64.

10E

-06

et9t
APPENDIX 9
et9t
77
Page 87: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OL

PV

1200

0189

.DA

Tda

te9.

12.2

004

TO

C (

m)

0.5 0

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1.

9

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)3.

4

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)0

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1

tube

dia

met

er (

mm

)39

.19

r (m

m)

19.6

0H

1.21

H0

-0.0

200

t 056

083.

88

t end

(s)

5630

0.02

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

216.

14

T0

222.

93

L (m

)2

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en r

adiu

s R

(m

m)

28

L/R

71.4

3

K (

m/s

)1.

8381

9E-0

6T

0 n

ot

reac

hed

logK

-5.7

4

ln((

H-h

)/(H

-H0)

) =

a*t +

bT

hiem

ana

lysi

s fo

r co

ntro

l

ab

flo

w

-0.0

0364

6319

-0.1

8711

0487

t156

200.

23h1

0.59

3

2.76

562E

-05

0.00

3438

337

t256

202.

75h2

0.59

7

0.90

8962

701

0.07

2214

76Q

(m

3 /s)

2.13

E-0

6dh

(m

)0.

61

1738

3.02

955

1741

KT

hiem

(m

/s)

1.72

E-0

6lo

gK-5

.77

90.6

5200

391

9.07

9265

406

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

1.

07

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

t

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

131.

84t1

5608

6.3

h10.

014

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

54.4

2t2

5615

4.71

h20.

469

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

8.03

E-0

6dh

(m

)0.

97K

Thi

em (

m/s

)4.

10E

-06

logK

-5.3

9

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

45

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/

(H-H

0))

= -1

le

ngth

of m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for

inte

rpre

tatio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref

gro

und

leve

l w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n af

ter

dis

turb

ance

, ref

gro

und

leve

l ti

me

of d

istu

rban

ce

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

56

mm

and

inne

r di

am 4

0 m

m

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref

gro

und

leve

l, to

p

ref

gro

und

leve

l, m

idpo

int o

f the

sec

tion

0.1

1.0

10.056

050

5615

056

250

5635

056

450

5655

056

650

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1

-0.5 0

0.5 1

1.5 55

800

5600

056

200

5640

056

600

5680

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Mea

sure

men

t Sec

tion

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 9
et9t
78
Page 88: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

Are

a:H

ole

:M

easu

rer:

Olk

iluot

o

PV

P13

Jere

Lah

denp

erä

Wat

er le

vel b

efor

e st

artin

g 0.

89 m

The

ref

eren

ce le

vel t

o de

pth

is to

p of

cas

ing

File

Dat

eTi

me

Dep

th

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

open

bo

reho

le

(m)

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

mea

s.

sect

ion

(m)

Pou

ring

wat

er/

Mov

ing

pist

onN

OT

E!

mea

sure

men

t/hol

e &

run

mea

sure

men

t de

pth

(m)

belo

w g

roun

d le

vel

mid

poin

t of t

he

sect

ion

KH

vors

lev

(m/s

)R

2K

Thie

m

(m/s

)flo

w

KTh

iem

(m/s

)tig

ht

com

men

ts

184

9.12

.200

413

:28

0no

t in

use

11.

50 m

OLP

V13

0001

84.D

AT

19.

17E

-06

0.99

901.

55E

-05

1.21

E-0

5

185

9.12

.200

413

:41

0no

t in

use

11.

00 m

OLP

V13

0001

85.D

AT

19.

01E

-06

0.99

941.

41E

-05

1.20

E-0

5

et9t
APPENDIX 10
et9t
79
Page 89: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OL

PV

1300

0184

.DA

Tda

te9.

12.2

004

TO

C (

m)

0.6 0

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2.

5

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)0

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1

tube

dia

met

er (

mm

)39

.19

r (m

m)

19.6

0H

0.28

H0

-0.5

220

t 048

609.

95

t end

(s)

4871

0.25

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

100.

3

T0

44.7

1

L (m

)2

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en r

adiu

s R

(m

m)

28

L/R

71.4

3

K (

m/s

)9.

1666

4E-0

6

logK

-5.0

4

ln((

H-h

)/(H

-H0)

) =

a*t +

bT

hiem

ana

lysi

s fo

r co

ntro

l

ab

flo

w

-0.0

2323

691

0.03

8807

086

t148

678.

84h1

0.11

4

2.50

051E

-05

0.00

1448

256

t248

681.

25h2

0.12

4

0.99

9044

426

0.02

0856

005

Q (

m3 /s

)5.

10E

-06

dh (

m)

0.16

8635

75.9

455

826

KT

hiem

(m

/s)

1.55

E-0

5lo

gK-4

.81

375.

6321

644

0.35

9287

645

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

59

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

t

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

929.

29t1

4861

2.39

h1-0

.478

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

26.8

0t2

4864

3.3

h2-0

.115

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

1.42

E-0

5dh

(m

)0.

58K

Thi

em (

m/s

)1.

21E

-05

logK

-4.9

2

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

76

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref

gro

und

leve

l, to

p

ref

gro

und

leve

l, m

idpo

int o

f the

sec

tion

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref

gro

und

leve

l w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n af

ter

dis

turb

ance

, ref

gro

und

leve

l ti

me

of d

istu

rban

ce

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

56

mm

and

inne

r di

am 4

0 m

m

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/

(H-H

0))

= -1

le

ngth

of m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for

inte

rpre

tatio

n

0.1

1.0

10.048

600

4865

048

700

4875

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1.5

-1.3

-1.1

-0.9

-0.7

-0.5

-0.3

-0.1 0.1

0.3

0.5 48

400

4850

048

600

4870

048

800

4890

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Mea

sure

men

t Sec

tion

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 10
et9t
80
Page 90: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OL

PV

1300

0185

.DA

Tda

te9.

12.2

004

TO

C (

m)

0.6 0

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)2

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)0

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1

tube

dia

met

er (

mm

)39

.19

r (m

m)

19.6

0H

0.30

H0

-0.4

100

t 049

376.

05

t end

(s)

4947

9.3

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

103.

25

T0

45.4

9

L (m

)2

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en r

adiu

s R

(m

m)

28

L/R

71.4

3

K (

m/s

)9.

0077

1E-0

6

logK

-5.0

5

ln((

H-h

)/(H

-H0)

) =

a*t +

bT

hiem

ana

lysi

s fo

r co

ntro

l

ab

flo

w

-0.0

2269

897

0.03

2663

064

t149

422.

54h1

0.04

5

1.86

251E

-05

0.00

1110

634

t249

424.

94h2

0.06

0

0.99

9424

021

0.01

6282

278

Q (

m3 /s

)7.

13E

-06

dh (

m)

0.25

1485

309.

678

856

KT

hiem

(m

/s)

1.41

E-0

5lo

gK-4

.85

393.

7742

883

0.22

6936

373

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

64

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

t

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

1218

.73

t149

378.

46h1

-0.3

68

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

29.4

1t2

4941

0.38

h2-0

.042

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

96Q

(m

3 /s)

1.23

E-0

5dh

(m

)0.

51K

Thi

em (

m/s

)1.

20E

-05

logK

-4.9

2

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

75

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref

gro

und

leve

l, to

p

ref

gro

und

leve

l, m

idpo

int o

f the

sec

tion

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref

gro

und

leve

l w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n af

ter

dis

turb

ance

, ref

gro

und

leve

l ti

me

of d

istu

rban

ce

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

56

mm

and

inne

r di

am 4

0 m

m

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/

(H-H

0))

= -1

le

ngth

of m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for

inte

rpre

tatio

n

0.1

1.0

10.049

350

4940

049

450

4950

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2 0

0.2

0.4 49

200

4930

049

400

4950

049

600

4970

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Mea

sure

men

t Sec

tion

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 10
et9t
81
Page 91: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base
et9t
82
Page 92: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

Are

a:H

ole

:M

easu

rer:

Olk

iluot

o

PV

P14

Jere

Lah

denp

erä

Wat

er le

vel b

efor

e st

artin

g 3.

03 m

The

ref

eren

ce le

vel t

o de

pth

is to

p of

cas

ing

File

Dat

eTi

me

Dep

th

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

open

bo

reho

le

(m)

Dep

th o

f pr

essu

re

sens

or

mea

s.

sect

ion

(m)

Pou

ring

wat

er/

Mov

ing

pist

onN

OT

E!

mea

sure

men

t/hol

e &

run

mea

sure

men

t de

pth

(m)

belo

w g

roun

d le

vel

mid

poin

t of t

he

sect

ion

KH

vors

lev

(m/s

)R

2K

Thie

m

(m/s

)flo

w

KTh

iem

(m/s

)tig

ht

com

men

ts

150

30.6

.200

413

:33

0no

t in

use

3.1

1.50

mO

LPV

1400

0150

.DA

T1

8.25

E-0

50.

9959

1.22

E-0

41.

25E

-05

151

30.6

.200

413

:44

0no

t in

use

3.1

1.50

mO

LPV

1400

0151

.DA

T1

7.64

E-0

50.

9870

1.18

E-0

41.

19E

-04

et9t
APPENDIX 11
et9t
83
Page 93: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OL

PV

1400

0150

.DA

Tda

te30

.6.2

004

TO

C (

m)

0.7 0

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)3.

1

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

6

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)0

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1

tube

dia

met

er (

mm

)39

.19

r (m

m)

19.6

0H

2.34

H0

1.76

30

t 048

751.

36

t end

(s)

4876

0.02

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

8.66

T0

4.97

L (m

)2

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en r

adiu

s R

(m

m)

28

L/R

71.4

3

K (

m/s

)8.

2485

9E-0

5

logK

-4.0

8

ln((

H-h

)/(H

-H0)

) =

a*t +

bT

hiem

ana

lysi

s fo

r co

ntro

l

ab

flo

w

-0.1

9340

0111

-0.0

3917

6876

t148

753.

49h1

1.96

6

0.00

1469

309

0.00

7378

388

t248

755.

88h2

2.11

1

0.99

5861

486

0.03

2070

032

Q (

m3 /s

)7.

32E

-05

dh (

m)

0.30

1732

5.55

045

72K

Thi

em (

m/s

)1.

22E

-04

logK

-3.9

1

17.8

1910

215

0.07

4051

059

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

68

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

t

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

131.

63t1

4875

3.73

h11.

984

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

5.31

t248

754.

21h2

2.01

8

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

99Q

(m

3 /s)

8.45

E-0

5dh

(m

)0.

33K

Thi

em (

m/s

)1.

25E

-04

logK

-3.9

0

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

66

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/

(H-H

0))

= -1

le

ngth

of m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for

inte

rpre

tatio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref

gro

und

leve

l w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n af

ter

dis

turb

ance

, ref

gro

und

leve

l ti

me

of d

istu

rban

ce

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

56

mm

and

inne

r di

am 4

0 m

m

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref

gro

und

leve

l, to

p

ref

gro

und

leve

l, m

idpo

int o

f the

sec

tion

0.1

1.0

10.048

750

4876

048

770

4878

048

790

4880

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8 2

2.2

2.4 48

600

4870

048

800

4890

049

000

4910

049

200

t (s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Mea

sure

men

t Sec

tion

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 11
et9t
84
Page 94: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

inpu

t file

OL

PV

1400

0151

.DA

Tda

te30

.6.2

004

TO

C (

m)

0.7 0

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)3.

1

dept

h of

pre

ssur

e se

nsor

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)4.

6

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)0

dept

h of

mea

s. s

ectio

n (m

)1

tube

dia

met

er (

mm

)39

.19

r (m

m)

19.6

0H

2.35

H0

1.73

60

t 049

444.

39

t end

(s)

4945

4.96

Tim

e ra

nge

(s)

10.5

7

T0

5.36

L (m

)2

scre

en d

iam

. (m

m)

56

scre

en r

adiu

s R

(m

m)

28

L/R

71.4

3

K (

m/s

)7.

6427

4E-0

5

logK

-4.1

2

ln((

H-h

)/(H

-H0)

) =

a*t +

bT

hiem

ana

lysi

s fo

r co

ntro

l

ab

flo

w

-0.1

7559

3517

-0.0

5848

7366

t149

446.

76h1

1.96

0

0.00

2145

944

0.01

3128

297

t249

449.

13h2

2.10

8

0.98

7027

263

0.06

2821

998

Q (

m3 /s

)7.

50E

-05

dh (

m)

0.31

6695

.456

515

88K

Thi

em (

m/s

)1.

18E

-04

logK

-3.9

3

26.4

2431

191

0.34

7301

105

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

65

Sta

t tes

tsti

gh

t

test

sta

t, a

<> 0

81.8

3t1

4944

6.76

h11.

960

test

sta

t, b

<> 0

4.46

t249

447.

83h2

2.03

5

t-cr

itica

l, 90

%1.

99Q

(m

3 /s)

8.45

E-0

5dh

(m

)0.

35K

Thi

em (

m/s

)1.

19E

-04

logK

-3.9

2

KH

vors

lev

/ KT

hiem

0.

64

end

of t

ime

rang

e us

ed to

line

fitti

ng

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e ra

dius

bas

ic ti

me

lag,

t co

rres

pond

ing

the

time

whe

n ln

((H

-h)/

(H-H

0))

= -1

le

ngth

of m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n

equ

al to

bor

ehol

e di

amet

er

Tim

e ra

nge

used

for

inte

rpre

tatio

n

ref

eren

ce w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n b

ased

on

phas

e 1,

ref

gro

und

leve

l w

ater

leve

l at t

he m

easu

rem

ent s

ectio

n af

ter

dis

turb

ance

, ref

gro

und

leve

l ti

me

of d

istu

rban

ce

equ

ival

ent a

rea

to a

dou

ble

tube

with

out

er d

iam

56

mm

and

inne

r di

am 4

0 m

m

initi

al, r

ef to

c

fina

l, re

f toc

ref

gro

und

leve

l, to

p

ref

gro

und

leve

l, m

idpo

int o

f the

sec

tion

0.1

1.0

10.049

400

4942

049

440

4946

049

480

4950

0

t (s)

(H-h)/(H-H0)

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8 2

2.2

2.4 49

200

4930

049

400

4950

049

600

4970

049

800

4990

0t (

s)

water level h (m, below ground level)

Mea

sure

men

t Sec

tion

PH

/Fin

tact

14.

12.2

004

et9t
APPENDIX 11
et9t
85
Page 95: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base
et9t
86
Page 96: Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004 · Jere Lahdenperä December 2005 Working Report 2005-76 Slug-Tests in PP- and PVP-Holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. December 2005 Base

Pu

mp

ing

Slu

gC

om

par

iso

nho

leda

te o

f sam

plin

gY

ield

Yie

ldw

ater

tabl

ew

ater

tabl

edh

leng

th o

utsi

de c

asin

gL

KT

hiem

TS

lug

test

LK

pum

p/K

slug

l/min

m3/

sat

sta

rt (

m)

at th

e en

d (m

)m

mm

m/s

m2/

sK

Thi

emm

PP

214

.10.

2004

4.0

6.67

E-0

52.

035.

903.

879.

001.

95E

-06

1.72

E-0

56.

6342

1E-0

69

0.29

PP

382.

12.2

003

0.2

2.50

E-0

62.

6411

.20

8.56

8.00

3.61

E-0

82.

92E

-07

1.00

988E

-07

80.

36P

P39

5.10

.200

41.

52.

50E

-05

1.15

5.69

4.54

9.00

6.05

E-0

75.

51E

-06

1.68

874E

-06

90.

36P

VP

1119

.10.

2004

4.8

8.00

E-0

51.

421.

780.

362.

001.

10E

-04

2.22

E-0

47.

52E

-05

21.

46P

VP

1211

.10.

2004

0.2

3.33

E-0

62.

093.

821.

732.

009.

53E

-07

1.93

E-0

61.

72E

-06

20.

55P

VP

135.

10.2

004

0.5

8.33

E-0

61.

442.

551.

112.

003.

71E

-06

7.51

E-0

61.

41E

-05

20.

26P

VP

146.

10.2

004

4.6

7.67

E-0

52.

443.

290.

852.

004.

46E

-05

9.02

E-0

51.

18E

-04

20.

38P

VP

216

.10.

1997

0.1

2.33

E-0

60.

511.

561.

052.

001.

10E

-06

2.22

E-0

61.

83E

-06

20.

60P

P4A

4.5.

2005

6.0

1.00

E-0

41.

257.

306.

052.

008.

17E

-06

1.65

E-0

51.

99E

-05

20.

41P

VP

4B4.

5.20

050.

71.

17E

-05

1.80

6.70

4.90

2.00

1.18

E-0

62.

38E

-06

3.72

E-0

62

0.32

et9t
APPENDIX 12
et9t
87