slug-tests in pp- and pvp-holes at olkiluoto in 2004 · jere lahdenperä december 2005 working...
TRANSCRIPT
P O S I V A O Y
FI -27160 OLKILUOTO, F INLAND
Tel +358-2-8372 31
Fax +358-2-8372 3709
Eve l i i na Tammis to
P i r j o He l l ä
Jere Lahdenperä
December 2005
Work ing Repor t 2005 -76
Slug-Testsin PP- and PVP-Holesat Olkiluoto in 2004
December 2005
Base maps: ©National Land Survey, permission 41/MYY/05
Working Reports contain information on work in progress
or pending completion.
Eve l i i na Tammisto
P i r j o He l l ä
JP-F in tac t Oy
Jere Lahdenperä
Pos iva Oy
Work ing Report 2005 -76
Slug-Testsin PP- and PVP-Holesat Olkiluoto in 2004
Tammisto, E., Hellä, P. & Lahdenperä, J. 2004. Slug-tests in PP- and PVP-holes at Olkiluoto in 2004. Eurajoki: Posiva Oy. 87 p. Working Report 2005-76.
ABSTRACT
As part of the program for the final disposal of the nuclear fuel waste, Posiva Oy investigates the hydrological conditions at the Olkiluoto island. The hydraulic conductivity in the shallow holes PP2, PP38 and PP39 were measured in July 2004 and PVP4A, PVP4B and PVP14 in June 2004, PVP11, PVP12 and PVP13 in December 2004 and PVP2 in January 2005. The length of PP-holes varies between 13 and 24 m and the measured sections (1 m) are located in the bedrock. PVP-holes have a length up to 10 m and the measured sections (2 m) are located in the overburden.
The measurements were conducted using the slug-test technique. In the slug-test the hydraulic head in the borehole is abruptly changed either by pouring water in the borehole or by lowering the pressure sensor. The conductivity is interpreted based on the recovery of the water level. This report presents the field measurements and their interpretation. The interpretation has been done using the Hvorslev’s method, but for the control also Thiem’s equation was applied.
According to the results hydraulic conductivities in PP-holes range from 10-9 m/s to 10-4 m/s and in PVP-holes from 10-6 m/s to 10-4 m/s. The range is almost the same as in measurements of year 2002. Also the results from holes measured both 2002 and 2004 are very close to each other. The results agree also with hydraulic conductivity information available from the pre-pumping done in connection of the groundwater sampling.
Keywords: Hydraulic conductivity, slug-test, disposal of spent nuclear fuel, hydrology
Tammisto, E., Hellä, P. & Lahdenperä, J. 2004. Vedenjohtavuusmittaukset PP- ja PVP-rei’issä Olkiluodossa 2004. Eurajoki: Posiva Oy. 87 s. Työraportti 2005-76.
TIIVISTELMÄ
Osana ydinjätteen loppusijoitustutkimusta Posiva Oy selvittää Olkiluodon saaren hydrologisia olosuhteita. Matalien reikien vedenjohtavuuksia mitattiin rei’istä PP2, PP38 ja PP39 heinäkuussa 2004, PVP4A, PVP4B ja PVP14 kesäkuussa 2004, PVP11, PVP12 ja PVP13 joulukuussa 2004 ja PVP2 tammikuussa 2005. PP-reikien syvyys vaihtelee välillä 13 - 24 m maanpinnasta, ja mittausjaksot (1 m) sijaitsevat kallion yläosassa. Syvimmät PVP-reiät ovat 10 m, ja mittausvälit (2 m) ovat maapeiteosuudella.
Mittaukset suoritettiin käyttäen slug-tekniikkaa. Mittauksessa kairanreikään saadaan ylipaine joko kaatamalla sinne vettä tai laskemalla paineanturia. Vedenjohtavuus lasketaan vedenpinnan palautumisajan perusteella. Tässä raportissa kuvataan kenttämittaukset ja niiden tulkinta. Mittaukset on tulkittu käyttäen Hvorslevin menetelmää ja tarkistusta varten vedenjohtavuus on laskettu myös Thiemin kaavalla.
Tulosten mukaan vedenjohtavuus PP-rei’issä vaihtelee välillä 10-9 m/s - 10-4 m/s ja PVP-rei’issä välillä 10-6 m/s - 10-4 m/s. Vaihteluväli on lähes sama kuin vuoden 2002 mittauksissa. Myös mittaustulokset rei’issä, jotka mitattiin sekä vuonna 2002 että 2004, ovat hyvin lähellä toisiaan. Tulokset sopivat hyvin myös pohjavesinäytteenoton yhteydessä tehtyjen esipumppausten antamiin vedenjohtavuustuloksiin.
Avainsanat: Vedenjohtavuus, slug-testi, käytetyn ydinpolttoaineen loppusijoitus, hydrologia
PREFACE
This report is part of the program for the final disposal of the nuclear fuel waste at the Olkiluoto island. The main aim of the study is to investigate the hydraulic conductivity close ground surface.
The field measurements were done by Jere Lahdenperä, Posiva Oy using the technique and equipment developed by PRG-Tec (Hellä & Heikkinen 2004). The interpretation of the results has been done at JP-Fintact Oy by Pirjo Hellä. The report is compiled by Eveliina Tammisto (JP-Fintact Oy).
Henry Ahokas (JP-Fintact Oy) is thanked for the valuable comments and guidance of the interpretation work and reporting.
1
CONTENTS
ABSTRACT
TIIVISTELMÄ
PREFACE
CONTENTS.................................................................................................................. 1
1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 3
2 Field measurements.......................................................................................... 5
2.1 Measurements in PP holes.................................................................... 6
2.2 Measurements in PVP-tubes ................................................................. 7
3 Method of interpretation .................................................................................... 9
3.1 Hvorslev’s method................................................................................. 9
3.2 Thiem’s formula..................................................................................... 9
4 Data processing .............................................................................................. 13
5 Results............................................................................................................ 15
6 On the accuracy of the results......................................................................... 21
6.1 Detection limits .................................................................................... 21
6.2 Effect of the time used in interpretation................................................ 23
6.3 Comparison with the pre-pumping results............................................ 24
7 Conclusions .................................................................................................... 27
References ................................................................................................................. 29
Appendix 1 Description of the data processing macros............................................... 31
Appendix 2 Measurements and results in PP2 ........................................................... 35
Appendix 3 Measurements and results in PP38.......................................................... 45
Appendix 4 Measurements and results in PP39.......................................................... 55
Appendix 5 Measurements and results in PVP2 ......................................................... 65
Appendix 6 Measurements and results in PVP4A....................................................... 69
Appendix 7 Measurements and results in PVP4B....................................................... 71
Appendix 8 Measurements and results in PVP11 ....................................................... 73
Appendix 9 Measurements and results in PVP12 ....................................................... 77
Appendix 10 Measurements and results in PVP13 ..................................................... 79
Appendix 11 Measurements and results in PVP14 ..................................................... 83
Appendix 12 Comparison of the obtained K-values with the prepumping results ........ 87
2
3
1 INTRODUCTION
As part of the program for the final disposal of the nuclear fuel waste, Posiva Oy investigates the prevailing hydrological conditions at the Olkiluoto island. Hydrogeological conditions of deep bedrock have been studied for several years at Olkiluoto. In deep boreholes, test pumpings have been done to investigate the hydraulic connections. To complement the knowledge already available from deep boreholes, the hydraulic conductivity in shallow bedrock and overburden was measured. PRG-Tec has developed the necessary equipment and technique to measure the distribution of conductivity close ground surface and measured the hydraulic conductivity in a number of shallow holes in 2002 (Hellä & Heikkinen 2004). The first PP-holes were measured in June 2002 and PVP-tubes in September 2002. Further measurements were done in 2004. The PP-holes were measured in July 2004 and the PVP-holes in June and December 2004 expect PVP2 in January 2005. This report describes these new measurements, the method of interpretation, results and detection limits. The equipment has been described in the report of the earlier measurements (Hellä & Heikkinen 2004).
4
5
2 FIELD MEASUREMENTS
The field measurements were done during June, July and December 2004 and PVP2 was measured in January 2005. The measured boreholes are presented in Figure 2-1 and listed in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2 (Teollisuuden Voima Oy 1989, Lehto 2001, Niemi & Roos 2004). Detais of the measurements in shallow (PP-holes) and groundwater observation tubes (PVP-tubes) with comments are presented in Appendices 2 to 11.
Figure 2-1. Location of the shallow boreholes where slug tests have been done. In red the ones presented in this study.
Table 2-1. Measured PP-holes and measurement times and operators.
Area Hole Date start Time start Date stop Time stop Operator
Olkiluoto PP2 8.7.2004 12:30 8.7.2004 15:27 Jere lahdenperä/Posiva Oy
Olkiluoto PP38 1.7.2004 14:30 1.7.2004 15:46 Jere lahdenperä/Posiva Oy
Olkiluoto PP38 2.7.2004 8:50 2.7.2004 10:49 Jere lahdenperä/Posiva Oy
Olkiluoto PP39 6.7.2004 13:51 6.7.2004 16:37 Jere lahdenperä/Posiva Oy
6
Table 2-2. Measured PVP-tubes, measurement times and main information on measurements.
Hole Date Time Operator Pressure sensor movement/m
Notes
PVP2 12.1.2005 13:22 and 13:26
Jere Lahdenperä/ Posiva Oy
1.5 and 1.5
PVP4A 30.6.2004 15:35 Jere Lahdenperä/ Posiva Oy
1.5
PVP4B 30.6.2004 16:00 Jere Lahdenperä/ Posiva Oy
1.5
PVP11 9.12.2004 14:49 and 14:59
Jere Lahdenperä/ Posiva Oy
1.5 and 1.5
PVP12 9.12.2004 15:32 Jere Lahdenperä/ Posiva Oy
1.5
PVP13 9.12.2004 13:28 and 13.41
Jere Lahdenperä/ Posiva Oy
1.5 and 1.0 Water table rose too much at first measurement so the second one was done with
smaller movement. PVP14 30.6.2004 13:33 and
13:44 Jere Lahdenperä/
Posiva Oy 1.5 and 1.5
2.1 Measurements in PP holes
The PP-holes have been measured using one-meter test section.
The measurement is divided into three stages:
1. Stabilization: the water level is stabilized in the hole after moving the equipment.
2. Inflation: the pressure level is stabilized in the hole and in the test section after inflating the packers.
3. Measurement: the piston is either pushed or pulled in the test section or water is poured into it. In the measurement, the stabilizing of the pressure transient is followed up.
Each of the three stages has a specific duration, see Table 2-3. An example of the water levels at different measurement stages is shown in Figure 2-2.
Table 2-3. Duration of the measurement stages.
Stage Time minimum/min Time maximum/min 1 1 2 2 2 5 3 5 15
7
15:20 15:25 15:30 15:35 15:40 15:45
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Pressure sensor of the measurement sectionPressure sensor of the hole waterlevel
OlkiluotoPP2
Stage1 Stage2 Stage3
Figure 2-2. An example of measurement results in a PP-hole.
2.2 Measurements in PVP-tubes
The groundwater observation tubes are measured without packers, using only the piston (pressure sensor). A PVC-tube is installed around the pressure sensor in order to increase the diameter of the piston and to generate an adequate pressure change after moving the piston. Only one measurement per each hole is made with this method as each hole consists of a plastic tube with two meters perforated section installed in the overburden.
The measurement is divided into two stages, Stage 1 and Stage 3 of the PP measurements see Table 2-3. An example of the measurement is presented in Figure 2-3.
8
14:30 14:35 14:40 14:45 14:50
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00Pressure sensor of the hole waterlevel
OlkiluotoPVP3A
Stage1 Stage3
Figure 2-3. An example of measurement results in a PVP-tube.
9
3 METHOD OF INTERPRETATION
3.1 Hvorslev’s method
The slug-test results were interpreted using Hvorslev’s method (Freeze & Cherry 1979). A homogeneous, isotropic, infinite medium in which both soil and water are incompressible is assumed. This assumption is valid when a fracture or the network of fractures is homogenous and planar (can be seen in the analysis as a linear behaviour). According to Hvorslev, the flow rate q at time t is related to the hydraulic conductivity K and to the unrecovered head difference H-h (H reference water level, h head at time t) according to following equation:
q(t) = p r2 dh / dt = FK(H-h), (Equation 3-1.)
where r is the radius of the hole and F depends on the shape and dimensions of the piezometer. The flow rate will decrease asymptotically to zero with increasing time. Solution of the differential equation 3-1 is
H-h = (H-H0) e –t/T0 (Equation 3-2.)
with initial condition h = H0 at t = 0 and the basic time lag T0 defined as
T0 = p r2 / FK . (Equation 3-3.)
Plotting the normalized head recovery (H-h) / (H-H0) on a logarithmic scale against time results in a straight line, if a fracture or aquifer under measurement is ideal i.e. homogeneous, planar and cylinder-symmetric. The basic time lag T0 can be defined from the plot being the time t, when ln (H-h)/(H-H0)= -1. The shape factor suggested by Hvorslev can be applied as the assumption of L/R > 8 (L length and R radius of the piezometer intake) is valid. The resulting equation for the hydraulic conductivity K is
K = r2 ln(L/R) / 2LT0 . (Equation 3-4.)
Figure 3-1 clarifies the notation used in the equations above.
3.2 Thiem’s formula
For the control of the results the hydraulic conductivity K was also calculated based on Thiem’s formula:
K = Q ln(r0/rw) / (2 p L ∆h) . (Equation 3-5.)
10
In Equation 3-5, Q is the flow rate (= Adh/dt, A is the void area between connection rods and the pressure cable, see Figure 3-1, dh change in head during the time interval dt), r0 is the radius of influence assumed to be 14 m, rw is radius of the borehole, L is the length of the test section and ∆h is the overpressure i.e. the head difference to the reference water level in the measurement section.
Two different cases were calculated separately, tight intervals with hardly any observed recovery and intervals with rather high hydraulic conductivity i.e. the ones with clear recovery. The calculation of the hydraulic conductivity in the two cases differed in the chosen time interval. In the case of clear observed flow, dt is short and the time at which the conductivity is calculated is chosen to be in the middle of the recovery period. As the recovery is not linear, the result is sensitive to the selection of the time, when the hydraulic conductivity is calculated (see Figure 3-2 a). If there is hardly any flow, a longer time interval equal to one third of the recovery period is used (see Figure 3-2 b). Slow recovery is approximately linear and the Thiem’s formula gives a reliable estimation of the hydraulic conductivity.
t inf inity
Ht = 0
H0
L
t+dtdh
h
t
packers
pressure sensor
PC
supporting rods
pressure cable
hole
Figure 3-1. Principle of the slug-test and interpretation according to Hvorslev’s method (modified after Freeze and Cherry 1979).
11
a)
t0 tend
h1
t1
h2
t2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
t (s)
wat
er le
vel h
(m, b
elow
gro
und
leve
l)
b)
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
t (s)
wat
er le
vel h
(m
, bel
ow g
roun
d le
vel)
tendt1 t2
h1h2
t0
Figure 3-2. Calculation of the hydraulic conductivity according to Thiem’s formula: in case of a) clear recovery and b) a tight interval with very slow recovery.
12
13
4 DATA PROCESSING
For the interpretation of the measurement data, a set of MSExcel-macros was developed (see Appendix 1 for the details). The actual analysis of the results uses a template file (xls), which contains the necessary formulas and graph templates (see Appendices 2 to 11). The figures on the template include a graph of the measured water level both in the borehole and in the measurement section. Another figure depicts the interpretation i.e. (H-h)/(H-H0) is plotted on a logarithmic scale versus time. In the latter figure also the fitted line through the measured points is plotted. The macro copies the data from the measurement file to the analysis template file. The functions and images in the template file are modified automatically. Further on, the results, K-values by Hvorslev’s method and the two K-values obtained by Thiem’s formula, together with some comments are copied to a separate result file.
The reference for all depth values in the results is the ground level whereas in the data files the reference is the top of the casing (TOC). The subtraction of the TOC is done automatically by the macros. The reference water level H is determined to be the average water level during phase one, Figure 2-2 and Figure 3-1 are referred for the notation. Phase one is used as the water level during it is more stable than during phase 2. H0, the water level at the measurement section after the disturbance, either adding water or lowering the pressure sensor in the borehole, is defined to be h at 10 (PP-holes) / 20 (PVP-holes) time steps after the minimum observed h. The minimum is not used as in the measurements, where the sensor is lowered, a piston effect occurs and the water level changes rapidly due to the movement. The time shift compensates this phenomenon, although potentially part of the recovery period on highly conductive intervals is lost. An example is given in Figure 4-1. There is a possibility to adjust the time period used for line fitting manually, if necessary. The time range used is shown on the interpretation plot.
min h
t0
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
53870 53880 53890 53900t (s)
wat
er le
vel h
(m, b
elow
gro
und
leve
l)
Figure 4-1. An example of the behavior of the water level in the measurement section at the time of lowering the pressure sensor.
14
A straight line is fitted through ln(H-h)/(H-H0) as function of time. The time interval used for the fitting is from t0, the time corresponding H0, to tend corresponding either the end time of the measuring period or the time when (H-h)/(H-H0) reaches 0.1 or the time when (H-h)/(H-H0) gets negative, this might happen if the data is noisy at the end of the measurement. The basic time lag, T0 needed for the Hvorslev analysis is then calculated from the resulting line equation. When T0 is known, the hydraulic conductivity K can be derived from equation 3-4. The time instants used in the Thiem’s formula are determined as described in chapter 3.2 and in Figure 3-2. The water levels h1 and h2 corresponding the times t1 and t2 are calculated as an average of eleven observed h values around time t. Average is used to compensate the possibly noisy data. Otherwise, erroneous results are obtained especially in case of a very small flow, when the changes in water level are small and the values of h are oscillating around an average level. Once the corresponding h and t values are defined, an average head difference to borehole can be calculated together with the outflow Q. These are then further used to calculate the hydraulic conductivity K assuming r0 to be 14 m. To check the correctness of the interpretation the quotient of the hydraulic conductivities KHvorslev / KThiem is calculated. If the ratio is between 1/3 and three, these two results are considered to be in accordance. On most of the tight intervals, T0 is not reached meaning that the value of T0 has to be extrapolated outside the observed time range and the result is thus more uncertain than in cases when T0 is reached during the observation period.
15
5 RESULTS
The interpretation of the hydraulic conductivities in each of the measured holes and sections are presented in Appendices 2 to 11. Three typical recovery curves were observed and an example of each type is given in Figure 5-1. In Figure 5-2, summary of the results in PP-holes is presented and Figure 5-3 contains the summary of the results in PVP-tubes. The cumulative distributions of the measured hydraulic conductivities are presented in Figures 5-4 and 5-5. In these figures the measurements of 2002 and 2004 are compared. In 2002 and 2004, mainly different holes and tubes were measured, which explains the difference in results. Only PP2, PVP4A and PVP4B have been measured both 2002 and 2004. These results are compared in Figure 5-6.
16
a)
b)
c)
Figure 5-1. Type of the observed recovery curves, a) a tight section with hardly any recovery, b) section with clear recovery resulting in a linear trend on the semi-log plot and c) a section with rapid recovery, which is not linear on the semi-log plot.
17
Figure 5-2. Hydraulic conductivity in PP-holes.
18
Figure 5-3. Hydraulic conductivity in PVP-holes. In PVP2 exact depth levels on overburden, bedrock and perforated section are not known.
19
PP cumulative distribution K
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1.0E-11 1.0E-10 1.0E-09 1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04
K (m/s)
Fre
quen
cy %
2002 KHvorslev (m/s) 2004 KHvorslev (m/s)
2002 and 2004 KHvorslev (m/s)
Figure 5-4. Cumulative distribution of the hydraulic conductivities in PP-tubes .
PVP cumulative distribution of K
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.0E-03
K (m/s)
Freq
uenc
y %
2002 KHvorslev (m/s) 2004 KHvorslev (m/s)
2002 and 2004 KHvorslev (m/s)
Figure 5-5. Cumulative distribution of the hydraulic conductivities in PVP-holes.
20
PP2
0
5
10
15
20
25
1.00E-09 1.00E-07 1.00E-05 1.00E-03 1.00E-01
Khorslev (m/s)D
epth
(m
)
PP2 2002 PP2 2004
PVP4A 2002 PVP4A 2004
PVP4B 2002 PVP4B 2004
Figure 5-6. Results fromPP-holes and PVP-tubes measured both 2002 and 2004.
21
6 ON THE ACCURACY OF THE RESULTS
6.1 Detection limits
The interpreted hydraulic conductivities are in the range from 10-9 m/s to 10-4 m/s in PP-holes and from 10-6 m/s to 10-4 m/s in PVP-holes. In the following the detection limits are estimated.
The accuracy of the water level obtained by the pressure sensor is ±1-2 mm. By analysing the recovery of some of the tight intervals it was noticed that the change in water level has to be at least 5 mm, so that it can be distinguished from the noise. The recovery period varies from 200 s to 1000 s. Taking the geometry of the tool and the hole into account this leads to minimum observable flow of 2·10-9 - 8·10-9 m3/s (30 ml/h) in PP-holes. The overpressure is typically 2 m leading to hydraulic conductivity 1·10-9 - 4·10-9 m/s according to Thiem’s formula. Consequently, the lower detection limit in PP-holes is about 5·10-9 m/s. The diameter of the PVP-holes and the instrument used are different and a typical overpressure is 1.5 m resulting in the detection limit of 1·10-8 m/s.
The upper limit of the measurement range is not as clear as the lower limit. It is estimated to be of the order of 5·10-5 m/s in PP-holes. This value is deduced assuming a steel rod with a diameter of 2.5 cm, including the pressure sensor hose inside the rod with a diameter of about half of the steel rod, and further more overpressure of 2 m and a 2 m decrease in water level within 10 s. The observed conductivity can be higher as the flow is not necessarily steady-state as assumed in the estimation of the detection limit. In PVP-holes the geometry is different and the used overpressure 1.5 m, resulting in an upper limit of 8·10-5 m/s. The diameter of PP-holes is 46 mm or 56 mm. The detection limits are calculated to 46 mm holes but are practically the same for 56 mm holes. The highest observed conductivity in the PP-holes is 3.4·10-5 m/s in hole PP2 at the depth 13.45 m (Appendix 2), where the water level in the measurement section decreased 0.5 m during 15 seconds. The difference between the water level in the measurement section and in the open hole was about 20 cm at the most. The same section has been measured in 2002 with analogous results. Repeatability seems to be good. When the sensor is lowered, there is a period of about 2-3 s, when the water level is unstable. The interpretation can be started first after more stabile conditions are reached so the recovery period should last at least 5 seconds. During the first seconds the water table already decreases considerably on sections with a high conductivity and the overpressure H0, which can be used in the interpretation is thus considerably less than the theoretical value of 2 m, as the example shows. In PVP-holes the highest observed conductivity is 8.3·10-5 m/s (PVP14, see Appendix 11). The recovery period is about 10 s and the change in water level is about 50 cm. The result is of the order of the maximum observable flow. In this case the flow is not linear on the semi-log plot. About the same limits are obtained by comparing the hydraulic conductivities resulting from the interpretations using the two methods, Hvorslev and Thiem. In general, the hydraulic conductivities calculated according to Thiem’s equation and according to Hvorslev’s method seem to be well in accordance, see Figure 6-1. The results from PP-
22
holes agree extremely well, when the conductivity is higher than about 5·10-8 m/s. In these cases T0 is reached during the observation period. When the hydraulic conductivity is small, i.e. hardly no recovery is observed the results obtained by the two methods give slightly different results, KThiem being approximately two to three times higher than KHvorslev. In the PVP-holes higher conductivities are observed and the interpreted hydraulic conductivity according to two methods match relatively well.
a)
1.0E-10
1.0E-09
1.0E-08
1.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.0E-10 1.0E-09 1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04
KHvorslev (m/s)
KT
hie
m (
m/s
)
2002 results 2004 results Ø = 56 mm
b)
1.0E-08
1.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.0E-03
1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.0E-03
KHvorslev (m/s)
KT
hie
m (
m/s
)
2002 results 2004 results
Figure 6-1. Comparison of the hydraulic conductivities calculated either by the Hvorslev’s method or using Thiem’s formula in a) PP-holes, in red the holes which diameter is 56 mm, and b) in PVP-holes.
23
The coefficient of correlation (R2), which measures the linear relationship between ln(H-h) / (H-H0) and time t, decreases clearly when the hydraulic conductivity in PP-holes is less than 5·10-9 m/s and in PVP-holes less than 5·10-7 m/s, see Figure 6-2. 6.2 Effect of the time used in interpretation
As can be observed from Figure 6-1, the hydraulic conductivity by Hvorslev’s method is normally less than the one obtained by Thiem’s formula in PP-holes. This is mainly due to the selection of the time range used in the interpretation. Also the time interval chosen for the interpretation can be a significant source of error in cases when the recovery is rapid. Selection of the starting time affects also the H0, the reference water level. Figure 6-3 gives an example of the effect of the selected time range. In the result figures (Appendices 2 to 11), the time range used in the interpretation according to Thiem’s formula and in the Hvorslev’s method are therefore shown.
a)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.0E-10 1.0E-09 1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04
KHvorslev (m/s)
2002 results 2004 results
b)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.0E-03
KHvorslev (m/s)
2002 results 2004 results
Figure 6-2. R2 as a function on hydraulic conductivity K in a) PP-holes and b) PVP-holes.
R2
R2
24
3) KHvorslev negative, KThiem = 1.5E-6 m/s
2) KHvorslev = 2.3E-6 m/s, KThiem = 2.0E-6 m/s
1) KHvorslev = 2.3E-6 m/s, KThiem = 2.8E-6 m/s
-0.5
-0.1
0.3
0.7
1.1
1.554500 54600 54700 54800 54900 55000
t (s)
wat
er le
vel h
(m, b
elow
gro
und
leve
l)
Open borehole Measurement Section Intervals
1
2
3
0.1
1.0
10.0
54500 54600 54700 54800 54900 55000 55100
t (s)
(H-h
)/(H
-H0)
Figure 6-3. An example how the time selected for the interpretation affects the resulting hydraulic conductivity. Three time intervals were used each corresponding to approximately one third of the recovery. The example is from PP2 at depth of 19.42 m. The interpreted values for this section were KHvorslev 1.1·10-6 m/s and KThiem 8.1·10-7 m/s. For the interval 3 the interpretation according to Hvorslev’s method failed as the T0 gets negative.
6.3 Comparison with the pre-pumping results
Groundwater sampling has been done partly in the same holes as the slug-tests during the summer 2004 (Tuominen 1998, Kröger 2004). Before taking the samples, the hole is pre-pumped for a certain period of time, typically few hours. The yield (l/min) and the change in the water table (m) are measured. Using this information and the length of the measurement section (either part of the hole below the water table or the perforated section in the groundwater observation tubes), hydraulic conductivity can be obtained
25
according to the Thiem’s formula (Equation 3-5). These values were compared to the conductivities resulting from the slug-tests. For the PP-holes, were the slug-tests were performed on 1 m measurement sections an average for the entire hole was calculated for the comparison. The results are shown in Figure 6-4 and listed in Appendix 12. The results from the pre-pumping match well with those from the slug-tests (Figure 6-4). Results of year 2004 are in red and results of year 2002 in grey. In general, pre-pumping values are slightly smaller which is natural because the time used for measurements is much longer than in slug-tests and natural decrease of flow during long-term pumping causes lower values of hydraulic conductivity. In cases where pre-pumping values are higher it is possible that outside the range measured by slug-test, a conductive fracture exists resulting in a higher conductivity in the pumping test, which measures the whole open borehole.
PVP3B
PVP9B
PP7
PVP14
PVP4B
PVP13
PP2
PP39
PP38
1.0E-08
1.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.0E-03
1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.0E-03
Pre-pumping, KThiem (m/s)
Slu
g te
st, K
Thi
em (m
/s)
*
Figure 6-4. Comparison of the hydraulic conductivities (m/s) obtained by the interpretation of the slug-tests and the pre-pumping in connection of groundwater sampling, results of 2002 in grey and results of 2004 in red.
26
27
7 CONCLUSIONS
Slug-tests were performed in several shallow (PP and PVP) holes at Olkiluoto mainly during the summer and the autumn 2004. The measurements were done using the same technique and equipment developed by PRG-Tec Oy as in the measurements in 2002 (Hellä & Heikkinen 2004).
The measurement results were interpreted by using Hvorslev’s method. For the comparison the conductivity was also calculated using Thiem’s formula. The interpretation was done by using for the purpose written MSExcel-macros. The analysis method developed is easy to use and quick as manual work is hardly needed for the file operations.
According to the results hydraulic conductivities in PP-holes range from 10-9 m/s to 10-4 m/s and in PVP-holes from 10-6 m/s to 10-4 m/s. With the applied technique in PP-holes flow in the range 5·10-9 – 5·10-5 m/s and in the range 1·10-8 – 8·10-5 m/s in PVP holes can be detected. The hydraulic conductivities resulting from the interpretation of the slug-tests were compared to those obtained by the pumping. The comparison showed that both results are in acceptable accordance with each other. The range of hydraulic conductivities in 2004 measurements is almost the same as in measurements of year 2002. In 2002 and 2004, mainly different holes and tubes were measured. Only holes PP2, PVP4A and PVP4B are measured both 2002 and 2004 and the results are very close to each other.
28
29
REFERENCES
Freeze, R. A. & Cherry, J.A. 1979. Groundwater. Prentice Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. United States. 604 p.
Kröger, T. 2004. Groundwater Sampling from Shallow Boreholes (PP and PR) and Groundwater Observation Tubes (PVP) at Olkiluoto in 2003. Eurajoki, Finland, Posiva Oy. 117 p. Working report 2004-44.
Hellä, P. & Heikkinen, P. 2004. Slug Tests in Shallow Holes at Olkiluoto 2002. Eurajoki, Finland, Posiva Oy. 201 p. Working Report 2004-13.
Lehto, K. 2001.Installation of groundwater observation tubes at Olkiluoto in Eurajoki 2001. Helsinki, Finland, Posiva Oy. 58 p. Working report 2001-39.
Niemi, K. & Roos, S. 2004. Havaintoputkien asentaminen, matalien kairareikien kairaaminen, painokairaaminen ja maaperänäytteet Eurajoen Olkiluodon tutkimusalueella vuoden 2003 syksyllä. Eurajoki, Finland, Posiva Oy. 43 p. Working report 2004-03. (in finnish)
Suomen Malmi Oy. 1989. Bedrock Surface Drillings in Olkiluoto, Eurajoki. Helsinki, Finland, Teollisuuden Voima Oy. 6 p. Working report 89-70.
Tuominen, M. 1998. Hydrogeochemical studies at Olkiluoto During 1997: Drilled Holes PR3 and PR4 and Ground Water Pipes PVP1 and PVP2. Helsinki, Finland, Posiva Oy.39 p. Working Report 98-07.
Öhberg, A. & Rouhiainen, P. 2000. Posiva groundwater flow measuring techniques. Helsinki, Finland, Posiva Oy. 81 p. POSIVA 2000-12.
30
31
APPENDIX 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE DATA PROCESSING MACROS
For the interpretation of the measurement data the same macros developed as part of the interpretation of the results of the slug measurements in 2002 (Hellä & Heikkinen 2004) were used. Some modifications were done:
• The separate macros for interpreting the results from PP- and PVP-holes were combined.
• An input box was added in the start of program which enable the user to select whether he is processing data from PP- or PVP-holes.
• In the input box it also possible to select if the time range used in the interpretation is automatically selected or if the user wants to define the time range manually.
• The borehole diameter and section length information can now be given in the makefile, the values replace the erroneous or missing values in the data files.
• The time instants used in Thiem’s equation were adjusted. They are now based on the change in head not on the length of the recovery period.
• Handling of errors was enhanced and the user is given information of the reason why the processing stops.
For the interpretation a MSExcel-file containing the necessary functions and graphs was used as a template. The macro copies the necessary data from the measurement file to the analysis template. The functions and graphs in the template file are modified automatically. Further on the results, K-values by Hvorslev’s method and the two K-values obtained by Thiem’s equation, together with some comments are copied to a separate result file. Also, the sheet with the interpretations is printed both as a paper copy and to a pdf-file.
Input Data
Data from the header of the measurement files used for interpretation:
- Top of the casing (m), reference level of all the depth values in the measurement file - Depth of the pressure sensor, borehole (m) - Initial depth of the pressure sensor of the measurement section (m) - Depth of the pressure sensor of the measurement section after movement (m) - Length of the measurement section (m) - Hole diameter (mm) - And from the data columns:
Cable Depth (column A) depth of the top of the measurement section (ref TOC), only first value used
Date (column B) date, only first value used Time (s) (column C) Time Phase (columnD) 1 = open borehole equipment installed
2 = inflation of packers + stabilization of pressure 3 = pressure increase + recovery phase
WaterLevelBorehole(m) (column G) water column above pressure sensor of borehole water WaterLevelMeasurementSection(m) (column K)
water column above pressure sensor of measurement section
32
The template workbook
The template workbook analysis_template.xls contains three sheets
parameters for input parameters, results and figure of the water level at the borehole and in the measurement section during the measurement and a figure with the measurement results and the fitted line. The data copied from the input file is marked with italic. The contents with some comments is described below:
- input file, name of the input file containing the hole id and the file number - date, date of the measurement - TOC (m), length of the casing above ground level - depth of pressure sensor open hole (m), measured from the top of the casing - depth of pressure sensor meas. section (m), measured from the top of the casing - depth of meas. section (m), top of the section measured from the top of the casing - depth of meas. section (m), midpoint of the section measured from ground level - tube diameter (mm), diameter of the tube having an equal area to a double tube with
given inner and outer diameter (16.6/24.9 mm in PP-holes and 40/56 mm in PVP-holes)
- r (mm), radius of the tube with the above diameter - H, initial water level (m, below ground level) average of the observed values during
phase 1 - H0, water level (m, below ground level) after the disturbance, H0* = min(water level
in measurement section), H0 = water level in measurement section 10 observations after H0*, the shift is done because the water level changes rapidly just after the moving of the pressure sensor.
- t0, time corresponding H0, start time of the line fitting or the time instant given by the user
- tend (s), end time of the line fitting, is either the end time of the measuring period, or the time when (H-h)/(H-H0) reaches 0.1 or the time when (H-h)/(H-H0) gets negative, this might happen if the data is noisy at the end of the measurement, the user can also define the tend
- T0, time when (H-h)/(H-H0) = 0.37, calculated from the estimated line equation - L (m), length of the measurement section - screen diam. (mm), hole diameter - screen radius R (mm), hole radius - L/R - K (m/s), hydraulic conductivity calculated according to equation 4-4. - logK
For the calculation of hydraulic conductivity according to Thiem’s equation following data is used:
Two time instants are used in calculating the flow for the Thiem analysis and two cases are considered:
- flow
33
o t1 (s) corresponds to the time when h is equal to (H + H0) / 2, if such h is not reached t1 is defined to be the time corresponding to one third of the recovery period.
o t2 (s) is 20 observations later - no flow
o t1 (s) is 20 observations later than t0 o t2 (s) is determined to be t0 + (tend – t0)/3, but if the recovery period is
short, less than 40 time steps, then the whole recovery is used i.e. t2 equal to tend
- h1 (m) is the average of 11 observed h values at time t1, average is used to compensate the possibly noisy data, otherwise erroneous results are obtained especially in case of no flow
- h2 (m) is the average of 11 observed h values at time t2 - dh (m) is the average change in water level, ∆h in equation 4-5, dh = (h1+h2)/2 – H0 - Q (m3/s) observed flow in time t1 – t2 - KThiem (m/s) hydraulic conductivity assuming r0 = 14 m - logK - KHvorslev / KThiem quotient of the hydraulic conductivities according to the two
methods The sheet contains also two figures, the first one presents the measured water levels in the open borehole and in the measurement section. The measured values are corrected so that the reference is always ground level. The other figure shows the results of the Hvorslev’s method, the measured (H-h)/(H-H0) values are plotted on a logarithmic scale as a function of time, also the fitted line is shown as well as the line (H-h)/(H-H0) = 0.37.
data initial measurement data together with the processed one. The columns are the following:
- Time(s), copy of the time column of the input file - Phase, copy of the phase column of the input file - WaterLevelBorehole(m), copy of the water level/borehole column of the input file - WaterLevelMeasurementSection(m), copy of the water level/measurement section
column of the input file - Open borehole, corrected water level in the open borehole below ground level (m)
taking into account the depth of the pressure sensor and the casing (=ps_depth – toc - wl)
- Measurement Section, h, corrected water level in the measurement section below ground level (m) taking into account the depth of the pressure sensor and the casing (=ps_depth – toc - wl). Here, the possible change in the pressure sensor depth is taken into account.
- t, time from t0 i.e. start of the line fitting - H-h, change in the water level at the measurement section - H-H0, the total over pressure (m) - (H-h)/(H-H0) - ln((H-h)/(H-H0)) - fitted, the fitted values at the given time
34
- (H-h)/(H-H0)<0.1, used to define the end of the time interval used in the line fitting
support data needed to draw a line (H-h)/(H-H0) = 0.37 in the lower figure on sheet parameters.
Subprograms
The interpretation macro consists of following subprograms:
prepare_file_for_analysis opens a file containing measurement data and copies the necessary data to the analysis template deleting the header rows of the input data file
preliminary_analysis modifies the functions and images in the analysis template workbook to correspond the current data file.
Write_results writes the results of the analysis to the results workbook (filename, depth of measurement section, hydraulic conductivity K according to Hvorslev’s method and the two Thiem approximations, R2-value of the line fitting and comments:
T0 not reached means that during the recovery period (H-h)/(H-H0) does not reach value 0.37 corresponding the time needed for the recovery assuming steady state flow. This means that the value of T0 has to be extrapolated outside the observed time range and the result is thus more uncertain than in the case when T0 is reached during the observation period.
Thiem different means that the hydraulic conductivity by Hvorslev’s method is at least three times greater or smaller than the one obtained by Thiem’s method.
q increasing with time means that the fitted line has a positive slope and thus no recovery is observed, indicates an error.
Negative K means hydraulic conductivity obtained by Hvorslev’s method is negative indicating an error.
Print_results prints the paper copy and a pdf-file from the parameters-sheet.
Are
a:H
ole
:M
easu
rer:
Olk
iluot
o
PP
2Je
re L
ahde
nper
ä
Wat
er le
vel b
efor
e st
artin
g 2.
40 m
The
ref
eren
ce le
vel t
o de
pth
is to
p of
cas
ing
File
Dat
eTi
me
Dep
th
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
open
bo
reho
le
(m)
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
mea
s.
sect
ion
(m)
Pou
ring
wat
er/
Mov
ing
pist
onN
OT
E!
mea
sure
men
t/hol
e &
run
mea
sure
men
t de
pth
(m)
belo
w g
roun
d le
vel
mid
poin
t of t
he
sect
ion
KH
vors
lev
(m/s
)R
2K
Thie
m
(m/s
)flo
w
KTh
iem
(m/s
)tig
ht
com
men
ts
171
8.7.
2004
12:3
013
.94
33.
922.
00 m
OLP
PP
2000
171.
DA
T13
.45
3.37
E-0
50.
9976
5.39
E-0
55.
70E
-05
172
8.7.
2004
12:4
514
.94
32.
922.
00 m
OLP
PP
2000
172.
DA
T14
.45
4.12
E-0
80.
9961
6.49
E-0
88.
51E
-08
T0
not r
each
ed
173
8.7.
2004
13:0
615
.94
32.
922.
00 m
OLP
PP
2000
173.
DA
T15
.45
1.73
E-0
70.
9923
3.57
E-0
74.
96E
-07
T0
not r
each
ed
174
8.7.
2004
13:3
516
.94
32.
922.
00 m
OLP
PP
2000
174.
DA
T16
.45
2.29
E-0
70.
9994
3.92
E-0
74.
07E
-07
175
8.7.
2004
13:5
617
.94
32.
922.
00 m
OLP
PP
2000
175.
DA
T17
.45
1.94
E-0
70.
9985
2.81
E-0
73.
58E
-07
176
8.7.
2004
14:2
118
.94
32.
922.
00 m
OLP
PP
2000
176.
DA
T18
.45
1.01
E-0
60.
9780
1.55
E-0
61.
60E
-06
177
8.7.
2004
14:4
119
.94
32.
922.
00 m
OLP
PP
2000
177.
DA
T19
.45
1.27
E-0
60.
9079
2.33
E-0
62.
53E
-06
178
8.7.
2004
14:5
821
.94
32.
922.
00 m
OLP
PP
2000
178.
DA
T21
.45
6.38
E-0
90.
9347
2.69
E-0
91.
38E
-08
T0
not r
each
ed
179
8.7.
2004
15:1
820
.94
32.
922.
00 m
OLP
PP
2000
179.
DA
T20
.45
4.03
E-0
70.
9997
6.60
E-0
76.
78E
-07
inpu
t file
OLP
PP
2000
171.
DA
Tda
te8.
7.20
04
TOC
(m)
0.99
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
42 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)3.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)5.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)13
.94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)13
.45
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
44
H0
0.87
t 045
456.
3
t end
(s)
4546
6.9
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
10.6
T 04.
7
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
46
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
23
L/R
43.4
8
K (
m/s
)3.
47E
-05
logK
-4.4
6ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.2
1338
0652
-0.0
0034
5557
t145
457.
3h1
0.97
0.00
1583
653
0.00
9747
645
t245
462.
0h2
1.26
0.99
760.
0335
8178
6Q
(m
3 /s)
1.69
E-0
5dh
(m)
0.32
1815
4.72
856
44K
Thi
em (m
/s)
5.39
E-0
5lo
gK-4
.27
20.4
7374
788
0.04
9620
401
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
64S
tat t
ests
tig
ht
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
134.
74t1
4546
1.1
h11.
23te
st s
tat,
b <>
00.
04t2
4545
9.9
h21.
17t-
criti
cal,
90%
2.02
Q (
m3 /s
)1.
33E
-05
dh (m
)0.
24K
Thi
em (m
/s)
5.70
E-0
5lo
gK-4
.24
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
61
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
0.1
1.0
10.045
450
4546
045
470
4548
045
490
4550
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8 1
1.2
1.4 45
100
4520
045
300
4540
045
500
4560
045
700
4580
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
inpu
t file
OLP
PP
2000
172.
DA
Tda
te8.
7.20
04
TOC
(m)
0.99
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
43 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)14
.94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)14
.45
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
44
H0
-0.4
2
t 046
291.
4
t end
(s)
4696
4.7
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
673.
3
T 039
39.6
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
46
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
23
L/R
43.4
8
K (
m/s
)4.
12E
-08
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-7.3
8ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.0
0025
0278
-0.0
1400
2076
t146
514.
2h1
-0.2
92.
9164
8E-0
70.
0001
1352
4t2
4651
8.9
h2-0
.29
0.99
610.
0030
3350
2Q
(m
3 /s)
1.10
E-0
7dh
(m)
1.72
7364
23.8
554
2861
KT
hiem
(m/s
)6.
49E
-08
logK
-7.1
96.
7766
7288
90.
0263
2731
3K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.64
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
085
8.15
t146
296.
2h1
-0.4
1te
st s
tat,
b <>
012
3.34
t246
516.
6h2
-0.2
9t-
criti
cal,
90%
1.96
Q (
m3 /s
)1.
49E
-07
dh (m
)1.
79K
Thi
em (m
/s)
8.51
E-0
8lo
gK-7
.07
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
48
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
0.1
1.0
10.046
250
4645
046
650
4685
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 45
800
4600
046
200
4640
046
600
4680
047
000
4720
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
inpu
t file
OLP
PP
2000
173.
DA
Tda
te8.
7.20
04
TOC
(m)
0.99
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
43 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)15
.94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)15
.45
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
44
H0
0.16
t 047
536.
3
t end
(s)
4841
1.7
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
875.
4
T 093
6.9
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
46
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
23
L/R
43.4
8
K (
m/s
)1.
73E
-07
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-6.7
6ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.0
0135
3889
0.26
8448
836
t148
252.
3h1
0.79
1.95
014E
-06
0.00
0986
059
t248
256.
9h2
0.80
0.99
230.
0300
6478
4Q
(m
3 /s)
2.24
E-0
7dh
(m)
0.64
4819
83.4
461
3722
KT
hiem
(m/s
)3.
57E
-07
logK
-6.4
543
5.66
0609
63.
3642
8315
6K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.49
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
069
4.25
t147
541.
0h1
-0.4
3te
st s
tat,
b <>
027
2.24
t247
829.
0h2
0.34
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
7.20
E-0
7dh
(m)
1.48
KT
hiem
(m/s
)4.
96E
-07
logK
-6.3
0K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.35
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
0.1
1.0
10.047
500
4770
047
900
4810
048
300
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-0.5
-0.3
-0.1 0.1
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5 47
000
4750
048
000
4850
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
inpu
t file
OLP
PP
2000
174.
DA
Tda
te8.
7.20
04
TOC
(m)
0.99
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
43 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)16
.94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)16
.45
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
44
H0
-0.4
9
t 049
064.
7
t end
(s)
4987
5.3
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
810.
5
T 071
0.7
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
46
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
23
L/R
43.4
8
K (
m/s
)2.
29E
-07
logK
-6.6
4ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.0
0136
4474
-0.0
3027
129
t149
543.
4h1
0.47
5.57
111E
-07
0.00
0261
046
t249
548.
1h2
0.48
0.99
940.
0076
4808
7Q
(m
3 /s)
3.71
E-0
7dh
(m)
0.96
5998
562.
409
3441
KT
hiem
(m/s
)3.
92E
-07
logK
-6.4
135
0.87
5284
80.
2012
7520
1K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.58
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
024
49.2
0t1
4906
9.4
h1-0
.47
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
115.
96t2
4933
5.6
h20.
16t-
criti
cal,
90%
1.96
Q (
m3 /s
)6.
36E
-07
dh (m
)1.
60K
Thi
em (m
/s)
4.07
E-0
7lo
gK-6
.39
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
56
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
0.1
1.0
10.049
050
4925
049
450
4965
049
850
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 48
600
4880
049
000
4920
049
400
4960
049
800
5000
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
inpu
t file
OLP
PP
2000
175.
DA
Tda
te8.
7.20
04
TOC
(m)
0.99
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
44 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)17
.94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)17
.45
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
43
H0
-0.4
7
t 050
513.
2
t end
(s)
5138
5.1
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
871.
9
T 083
5.2
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
46
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
23
L/R
43.4
8
K (
m/s
)1.
94E
-07
logK
-6.7
1ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.0
0115
2768
-0.0
3719
2173
t151
072.
9h1
0.48
7.43
866E
-07
0.00
0374
639
t251
077.
6h2
0.49
0.99
850.
0113
8959
6Q
(m
3 /s)
2.62
E-0
7dh
(m)
0.95
2401
567.
573
3700
KT
hiem
(m/s
)2.
81E
-07
logK
-6.5
531
1.53
8286
50.
4799
7469
4K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.69
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
015
49.7
0t1
5051
7.9
h1-0
.45
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
99.2
7t2
5080
4.3
h20.
14t-
criti
cal,
90%
1.96
Q (
m3 /s
)5.
58E
-07
dh (m
)1.
59K
Thi
em (m
/s)
3.58
E-0
7lo
gK-6
.45
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
54
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
0.1
1.0
10.050
500
5070
050
900
5110
051
300
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 50
000
5050
051
000
5150
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
inpu
t file
OLP
PP
2000
176.
DA
Tda
te8.
7.20
04
TOC
(m)
0.99
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
43 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)18
.94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)18
.45
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
44
H0
-0.1
7
t 051
952.
0
t end
(s)
5246
9.7
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
517.
6
T 016
0.4
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
46
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
23
L/R
43.4
8
K (
m/s
)1.
01E
-06
logK
-5.9
9ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.0
0406
9741
-0.3
4721
4122
t152
035.
3h1
0.63
1.30
557E
-05
0.00
3899
084
t252
040.
0h2
0.65
0.97
800.
0915
0989
4Q
(m
3 /s)
1.22
E-0
6dh
(m)
0.80
9717
0.78
9221
89K
Thi
em (m
/s)
1.55
E-0
6lo
gK-5
.81
813.
7140
833
18.3
3081
879
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
65S
tat t
ests
tig
ht
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
311.
72t1
5195
6.7
h1-0
.06
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
89.0
5t2
5212
3.7
h20.
92t-
criti
cal,
90%
1.96
Q (
m3 /s
)1.
58E
-06
dh (m
)1.
01K
Thi
em (m
/s)
1.60
E-0
6lo
gK-5
.79
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
63
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
0.1
1.0
10.051
950
5205
052
150
5225
052
350
5245
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 51
600
5180
052
000
5220
052
400
5260
052
800
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
inpu
t file
OLP
PP
2000
177.
DA
Tda
te8.
7.20
04
TOC
(m)
0.99
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
63 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)19
.94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)19
.45
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
45
H0
0.04
t 053
232.
3
t end
(s)
5350
0.0
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
267.
7
T 012
8.4
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
46
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
23
L/R
43.4
8
K (
m/s
)1.
27E
-06
logK
-5.9
0ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.0
0462
7438
-0.4
0590
2288
t153
284.
3h1
0.73
4.36
99E
-05
0.00
6759
521
t253
289.
0h2
0.76
0.90
790.
1141
6360
8Q
(m
3 /s)
1.61
E-0
6dh
(m)
0.71
1121
3.40
585
1138
KT
hiem
(m/s
)2.
33E
-06
logK
-5.6
314
6.14
8010
814
.831
9287
2K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.54
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
010
5.89
t153
237.
0h1
0.19
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
60.0
5t2
5332
1.5
h20.
89t-
criti
cal,
90%
1.96
Q (
m3 /s
)2.
26E
-06
dh (m
)0.
91K
Thi
em (m
/s)
2.53
E-0
6lo
gK-5
.60
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
50
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
0.1
1.0
10.053
200
5330
053
400
5350
053
600
5370
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 2 52
800
5300
053
200
5340
053
600
5380
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
inpu
t file
OLP
PP
2000
178.
DA
Tda
te8.
7.20
04
TOC
(m)
0.99
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
43 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)20
.94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)20
.45
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
44
H0
-0.5
0
t 054
219.
2
t end
(s)
5489
4.3
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
675.
2
T 040
3.5
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
46
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
23
L/R
43.4
8
K (
m/s
)4.
03E
-07
logK
-6.4
0ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.0
0243
8193
-0.0
1627
7167
t154
491.
9h1
0.46
7.29
897E
-07
0.00
0283
842
t254
496.
6h2
0.47
0.99
970.
0075
9263
1Q
(m
3 /s)
6.28
E-0
7dh
(m)
0.97
1115
8683
.92
2859
KT
hiem
(m/s
)6.
60E
-07
logK
-6.1
864
3.27
6326
40.
1648
1576
4K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.61
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
033
40.4
6t1
5422
3.9
h1-0
.48
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
57.3
5t2
5444
3.9
h20.
34t-
criti
cal,
90%
1.96
Q (
m3 /s
)1.
00E
-06
dh (m
)1.
51K
Thi
em (m
/s)
6.78
E-0
7lo
gK-6
.17
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
59
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
0.1
1.0
10.054
200
5440
054
600
5480
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 53
800
5400
054
200
5440
054
600
5480
055
000
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
inpu
t file
OLP
PP
2000
179.
DA
Tda
te8.
7.20
04
TOC
(m)
0.99
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
43 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)21
.94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)21
.45
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
43
H0
-0.5
6
t 055
317.
2
t end
(s)
5560
1.9
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
284.
7
T 025
471.
5
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
46
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
23
L/R
43.4
8
K (
m/s
)6.
38E
-09
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-8.2
0ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-3.9
2477
E-0
5-0
.000
3029
8t1
5540
9.1
h1-0
.55
2.98
976E
-07
4.90
669E
-05
t255
413.
8h2
-0.5
50.
9347
0.00
0854
3Q
(m
3 /s)
5.22
E-0
9dh
(m)
1.98
1723
2.84
579
1204
KT
hiem
(m/s
)2.
69E
-09
logK
-8.5
70.
0125
7703
40.
0008
7871
4K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
2.37
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
013
1.27
t155
321.
9h1
-0.5
6te
st s
tat,
b <>
06.
17t2
5541
1.5
h2-0
.55
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
2.69
E-0
8dh
(m)
1.99
KT
hiem
(m/s
)1.
38E
-08
logK
-7.8
6K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.46
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
0.1
1.0
10.055
300
5540
055
500
5560
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 55
000
5510
055
200
5530
055
400
5550
055
600
5570
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
Are
a:H
ole
:M
easu
rer:
Olk
iluot
o
PP
38Je
re L
ahde
nper
ä
Wat
er le
vel b
efor
e st
artin
g 2.
57 m
(1.
7.20
04)
and
2.50
m (
2.7.
2004
)T
he r
efer
ence
leve
l to
dept
h is
top
of c
asin
g
File
Dat
eTi
me
Dep
th
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
open
bo
reho
le
(m)
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
mea
s.
sect
ion
(m)
Pou
ring
wat
er/
Mov
ing
pist
onN
OT
E!
mea
sure
men
t/hol
e &
run
mea
sure
men
t de
pth
(m)
belo
w g
roun
d le
vel
mid
poin
t of t
he
sect
ion
KH
vors
lev
(m/s
)R
2K
Thie
m
(m/s
)flo
w
KTh
iem
(m/s
)tig
ht
com
men
ts
154
1.7.
2004
14:3
03.
33.
002.
2846
0 m
lO
LPP
3800
0154
.DA
T3.
23.
90E
-09
0.94
067.
03E
-09
1.23
E-0
8T
0 no
t rea
ched
155
1.7.
2004
15:0
03.
943.
002.
9233
0 m
lO
LPP
3800
0155
.DA
T3.
844.
43E
-09
0.97
851.
52E
-08
1.05
E-0
8T
0 no
t rea
ched
156
1.7.
2004
15:2
54.
943.
002.
421.
82 m
OLP
P38
0001
56.D
AT
4.84
9.80
E-0
90.
9612
1.52
E-0
83.
31E
-08
T0
not r
each
ed
157
2.7.
2004
8:50
5.94
3.00
2.92
2.00
mO
LPP
3800
0157
.DA
T5.
841.
42E
-08
0.98
383.
17E
-08
3.69
E-0
8T
0 no
t rea
ched
158
2.7.
2004
9:25
6.94
3.00
2.92
2.00
mO
LPP
3800
0158
.DA
T6.
841.
87E
-07
0.97
692.
24E
-07
4.19
E-0
7
159
2.7.
2004
9:55
7.94
3.00
2.92
2.00
mO
LPP
3800
0159
.DA
T7.
841.
71E
-07
0.99
663.
33E
-07
3.31
E-0
7T
0 no
t rea
ched
160
2.7.
2004
10:2
58.
943.
002.
922.
00 m
OLP
P38
0001
60.D
AT
8.84
5.89
E-0
80.
9897
1.04
E-0
71.
32E
-07
T0
not r
each
ed
161
2.7.
2004
10:4
09.
943.
002.
922.
00 m
OLP
P38
0001
61.D
AT
9.84
7.92
E-0
90.
9087
1.20
E-0
82.
81E
-08
T0
not r
each
ed
inpu
t file
OLP
P38
0001
54.D
AT
date
1.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.6
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
28 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
28
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
28
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)3.
3
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)3.
2
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
27
H0
-1.0
7
t 053
349.
0
t end
(s)
5378
7.4
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
438.
4
T 041
662.
0
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)3.
70E
-09
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-8.4
3ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-2.3
9379
E-0
5-0
.002
6967
98t1
5349
3.3
h1-1
.05
1.38
933E
-07
3.52
076E
-05
t253
497.
9h2
-1.0
50.
9406
0.00
0762
426
Q (
m3 /s
)1.
60E
-08
dh (m
)2.
3229
686.
8844
618
76K
Thi
em (m
/s)
6.82
E-0
9lo
gK-8
.17
0.01
7256
774
0.00
1090
505
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
54S
tat t
ests
tig
ht
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
172.
30t1
5335
3.6
h1-1
.07
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
76.6
0t2
5349
5.6
h2-1
.05
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
2.81
E-0
8dh
(m)
2.33
KT
hiem
(m/s
)1.
19E
-08
logK
-7.9
2K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.31
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
0.1
1.0
10.053
300
5340
053
500
5360
053
700
5380
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-2
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 52
600
5280
053
000
5320
053
400
5360
053
800
5400
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P38
0001
55.D
AT
date
1.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.6
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
47 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)3.
94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)3.
84
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
46
H0
-0.6
5
t 055
350.
0
t end
(s)
5560
0.3
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
250.
2
T 038
840.
2
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)3.
96E
-09
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-8.4
0ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-2.5
748E
-05
5.77
205E
-05
t155
429.
8h1
-0.6
51.
2699
6E-0
71.
8291
5E-0
5t2
5543
5.2
h2-0
.64
0.97
490.
0002
9867
2Q
(m
3 /s)
1.84
E-0
8dh
(m)
2.11
4110
6.05
216
1057
KT
hiem
(m/s
)8.
65E
-09
logK
-8.0
60.
0036
6685
79.
4289
5E-0
5K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.46
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
020
2.75
t155
354.
7h1
-0.6
5te
st s
tat,
b <>
03.
16t2
5543
2.1
h2-0
.64
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
1.33
E-0
8dh
(m)
2.11
KT
hiem
(m/s
)6.
26E
-09
logK
-8.2
0K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.63
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
0.1
1.0
10.055
250
5535
055
450
5555
055
650
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 54
600
5480
055
000
5520
055
400
5560
055
800
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P38
0001
56.D
AT
date
1.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.6
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
62 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
42
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
24
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
84
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
62
H0
-1.2
5
t 057
000.
0
t end
(s)
5770
0.0
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
699.
9
T 018
603.
7
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)8.
28E
-09
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-8.0
8ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-5.3
539E
-05
-0.0
0397
9474
t157
230.
5h1
-1.2
07.
9769
1E-0
83.
2170
2E-0
5t2
5723
5.2
h2-1
.20
0.99
340.
0008
7940
1Q
(m
3 /s)
3.17
E-0
8dh
(m)
2.82
4504
75.1
4229
85K
Thi
em (m
/s)
1.11
E-0
8lo
gK-7
.95
0.34
8372
882
0.00
2308
436
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
74S
tat t
ests
tig
ht
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
671.
17t1
5700
5.5
h1-1
.24
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
123.
70t2
5723
2.9
h2-1
.20
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
5.65
E-0
8dh
(m)
2.85
KT
hiem
(m/s
)1.
96E
-08
logK
-7.7
1K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.42
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
0.1
1.0
10.056
900
5710
057
300
5750
057
700
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-2
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 2 56
000
5650
057
000
5750
058
000
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P38
0001
57.D
AT
date
2.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.6
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
76 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)5.
94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)5.
84
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
78
H0
-1.0
8
t 033
250.
1
t end
(s)
3369
9.9
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
449.
9
T 011
225.
8
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)1.
37E
-08
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-7.8
6ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-8.8
7496
E-0
5-0
.003
7126
19t1
3339
5.9
h1-1
.03
1.78
348E
-07
4.64
246E
-05
t233
402.
1h2
-1.0
20.
9924
0.00
1014
229
Q (
m3 /s
)8.
66E
-08
dh (m
)2.
8024
7625
.408
1894
KT
hiem
(m/s
)3.
05E
-08
logK
-7.5
20.
2547
2271
0.00
1948
285
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
45S
tat t
ests
tig
ht
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
497.
62t1
3325
4.7
h1-1
.07
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
79.9
7t2
3339
8.6
h2-1
.02
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
8.68
E-0
8dh
(m)
2.83
KT
hiem
(m/s
)3.
04E
-08
logK
-7.5
2K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.45
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
0.1
1.0
10.033
200
3330
033
400
3350
033
600
3370
033
800
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-2
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 2 32
500
3300
033
500
3400
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P38
0001
58.D
AT
date
2.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.6
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
78 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)6.
94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)6.
84
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
82
H0
-0.6
6
t 035
192.
8
t end
(s)
3606
3.1
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
870.
3
T 086
8.3
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)1.
77E
-07
logK
-6.7
5ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.0
0100
7456
-0.1
2524
8618
t135
726.
5h1
0.57
2.54
372E
-06
0.00
1280
175
t235
731.
1h2
0.58
0.97
690.
0388
6862
Q (
m3 /s
)2.
72E
-07
dh (m
)1.
2415
6859
.982
837
05K
Thi
em (m
/s)
2.17
E-0
7lo
gK-6
.66
236.
9793
015.
5974
0154
6K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.82
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
039
6.06
t135
197.
5h1
-0.6
3te
st s
tat,
b <>
097
.84
t235
484.
9h2
0.24
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
8.25
E-0
7dh
(m)
2.01
KT
hiem
(m/s
)4.
06E
-07
logK
-6.3
9K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.44
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
0.1
1.0
10.035
150
3535
035
550
3575
035
950
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 2 34
500
3500
035
500
3600
036
500
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P38
0001
59.D
AT
date
2.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.6
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
96 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)7.
94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)7.
84
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
97
H0
-0.7
1
t 036
970.
6
t end
(s)
3751
7.2
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
546.
7
T 094
9.8
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)1.
62E
-07
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-6.7
9ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.0
0102
5719
-0.0
2576
5011
t137
149.
9h1
-0.1
91.
2429
1E-0
60.
0003
9281
8t2
3715
4.5
h2-0
.17
0.99
660.
0094
4283
6Q
(m
3 /s)
7.03
E-0
7dh
(m)
2.15
6810
53.1
681
2311
KT
hiem
(m/s
)3.
23E
-07
logK
-6.4
960
.727
5687
70.
2060
6527
9K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.50
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
082
5.26
t136
975.
3h1
-0.6
9te
st s
tat,
b <>
065
.59
t237
152.
2h2
-0.1
8t-
criti
cal,
90%
1.96
Q (
m3 /s
)7.
81E
-07
dh (m
)2.
41K
Thi
em (m
/s)
3.21
E-0
7lo
gK-6
.49
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
51
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
0.1
1.0
10.036
950
3705
037
150
3725
037
350
3745
037
550
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 2 36
000
3650
037
000
3750
038
000
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P38
0001
60.D
AT
date
2.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.6
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
97 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)8.
94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)8.
84
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
99
H0
-0.7
2
t 038
450.
0
t end
(s)
3870
0.1
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
250.
1
T 031
28.6
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)4.
92E
-08
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-7.3
1ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.0
0031
8866
-0.0
0239
2158
t138
530.
2h1
-0.6
44.
4408
4E-0
76.
3735
5E-0
5t2
3853
4.8
h2-0
.64
0.99
800.
0010
3493
7Q
(m
3 /s)
2.49
E-0
7dh
(m)
2.63
5155
66.7
879
1045
KT
hiem
(m/s
)9.
38E
-08
logK
-7.0
30.
5522
2072
80.
0011
1929
4K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.52
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
071
8.03
t138
454.
7h1
-0.7
1te
st s
tat,
b <>
037
.53
t238
532.
5h2
-0.6
4t-
criti
cal,
90%
1.96
Q (
m3 /s
)2.
64E
-07
dh (m
)2.
66K
Thi
em (m
/s)
9.81
E-0
8lo
gK-7
.01
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
50
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
0.1
1.0
10.038
350
3845
038
550
3865
038
750
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 2 37
800
3800
038
200
3840
038
600
3880
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P38
0001
61.D
AT
date
2.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.6
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)2.
39 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)9.
94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)9.
84
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H1.
95
H0
-0.7
8
t 039
349.
9
t end
(s)
3960
0.0
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
250.
1
T 025
619.
4
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)6.
01E
-09
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-8.2
2ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-3.8
9851
E-0
5-0
.001
2270
97t1
3942
9.7
h1-0
.77
2.91
546E
-07
4.23
998E
-05
t239
434.
8h2
-0.7
70.
9452
0.00
0685
774
Q (
m3 /s
)2.
85E
-08
dh (m
)2.
7217
880.
6345
810
37K
Thi
em (m
/s)
1.04
E-0
8lo
gK-7
.98
0.00
8409
020.
0004
8768
7K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.58
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
013
3.72
t139
354.
6h1
-0.7
8te
st s
tat,
b <>
028
.94
t239
432.
2h2
-0.7
7t-
criti
cal,
90%
1.96
Q (
m3 /s
)3.
64E
-08
dh (m
)2.
72K
Thi
em (m
/s)
1.32
E-0
8lo
gK-7
.88
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
45
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
0.1
1.0
10.039
250
3935
039
450
3955
039
650
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 2
2.5 39
000
3920
039
400
3960
039
800
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
Are
a:H
ole
:M
easu
rer:
Olk
iluot
o
PP
39Je
re L
ahde
nper
ä
Wat
er le
vel b
efor
e st
artin
g 1.
20 m
The
ref
eren
ce le
vel t
o de
pth
is to
p of
cas
ing
File
Dat
eTi
me
Dep
th
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
open
bo
reho
le
(m)
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
mea
s.
sect
ion
(m)
Pou
ring
wat
er/
Mov
ing
pist
onN
OT
E!
mea
sure
men
t/hol
e &
run
mea
sure
men
t de
pth
(m)
belo
w g
roun
d le
vel
mid
poin
t of t
he
sect
ion
KH
vors
lev
(m/s
)R
2K
Thie
m
(m/s
)flo
w
KTh
iem
(m/s
)tig
ht
com
men
ts
162
6.7.
2004
13:5
14.
43.
001.
572.
00 m
OLP
P39
0001
62.D
AT
4.4
2.09
E-0
90.
3447
1.11
E-0
81.
53E
-08
T0
not r
each
ed
163
6.7.
2004
14:1
24.
923.
002.
921.
34 m
OLP
P39
0001
63.D
AT
4.92
6.17
E-0
80.
8868
1.30
E-0
71.
47E
-07
T0
not r
each
ed
164
6.7.
2004
14:3
45.
923.
002.
922.
00 m
OLP
P39
0001
64.D
AT
5.92
2.74
E-0
80.
9605
8.90
E-0
89.
47E
-08
T0
not r
each
ed
165
6.7.
2004
15:0
26.
943.
002.
922.
00 m
OLP
P39
0001
65.D
AT
6.94
4.58
E-0
60.
9997
7.62
E-0
67.
56E
-06
166
6.7.
2004
15:2
07.
943.
002.
922.
00 m
OLP
P39
0001
66.D
AT
7.94
4.34
E-0
60.
9985
7.18
E-0
67.
19E
-06
167
6.7.
2004
15:4
08.
943.
002.
922.
00 m
OLP
P39
0001
67.D
AT
8.94
6.23
E-0
90.
7869
6.31
E-0
92.
69E
-08
T0
not r
each
ed
168
6.7.
2004
15:5
69.
943.
002.
922.
00 m
OLP
P39
0001
68.D
AT
9.94
2.42
E-0
80.
8462
6.04
E-0
89.
65E
-08
T0
not r
each
ed
169
6.7.
2004
16:1
510
.94
3.00
2.92
2.00
mO
LPP
3900
0169
.DA
T10
.94
1.59
E-1
00.
0091
1.22
E-0
84.
34E
-09
T0
not r
each
ed
170
6.7.
2004
16:2
811
.94
3.00
2.92
2.00
mO
LPP
3900
0170
.DA
T11
.94
3.71
E-0
90.
6945
1.41
E-0
81.
39E
-08
T0
not r
each
ed
inpu
t file
OLP
P39
0001
62.D
AT
date
6.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.5
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)1.
11 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1.
57
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)3.
57
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
4
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
4
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H0.
70
H0
-1.8
5
t 050
399.
9
t end
(s)
5059
9.9
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
200.
0
T 013
6902
.4
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)1.
12E
-09
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-8.9
5ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-7.3
0128
E-0
6-0
.000
4376
73t1
5046
3.9
h1-1
.85
2.54
03E
-07
2.91
451E
-05
t250
468.
5h2
-1.8
50.
4961
0.00
0423
762
Q (
m3 /s
)-1
.59E
-08
dh (m
)2.
5482
6.09
1611
983
9K
Thi
em (m
/s)
-6.1
8E-0
9lo
gK#N
UM
!0.
0001
4834
50.
0001
5066
3K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
-0.1
8S
tat t
ests
tig
ht
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
28.7
4t1
5040
4.6
h1-1
.85
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
15.0
2t2
5046
6.2
h2-1
.85
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
8.78
E-0
9dh
(m)
2.54
KT
hiem
(m/s
)3.
41E
-09
logK
-8.4
7K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.33
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
0.1
1.0
10.050
300
5040
050
500
5060
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-2.5 -2
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 49
800
5000
050
200
5040
050
600
5080
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P39
0001
63.D
AT
date
6.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.5
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)0.
75 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H0.
74
H0
-0.6
2
t 051
571.
9
t end
(s)
5198
5.9
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
414.
0
T 026
34.2
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)5.
84E
-08
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-7.2
3ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.0
0043
5183
0.14
6347
038
t151
708.
1h1
-0.7
43.
7099
3E-0
60.
0008
8785
2t2
5171
2.7
h2-0
.74
0.88
680.
0185
9775
4Q
(m
3 /s)
1.90
E-0
7dh
(m)
1.48
1375
9.75
171
1757
KT
hiem
(m/s
)1.
26E
-07
logK
-6.9
04.
7591
7417
0.60
7704
935
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
46S
tat t
ests
tig
ht
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
117.
30t1
5157
6.6
h1-0
.85
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
164.
83t2
5171
0.4
h2-0
.74
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
2.21
E-0
7dh
(m)
1.54
KT
hiem
(m/s
)1.
42E
-07
logK
-6.8
5K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.41
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
0.1
1.0
10.051
550
5165
051
750
5185
051
950
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1 51
000
5120
051
400
5160
051
800
5200
052
200
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P39
0001
64.D
AT
date
6.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.5
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)0.
73 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)5.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)5.
92
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H0.
73
H0
-1.5
1
t 052
850.
1
t end
(s)
5360
0.0
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
750.
0
T 036
55.5
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)4.
21E
-08
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-7.3
8ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.0
0027
1008
-0.0
0932
9477
t153
098.
0h1
-1.3
42.
1382
5E-0
79.
2538
3E-0
5t2
5310
2.7
h2-1
.34
0.99
800.
0026
0433
6Q
(m
3 /s)
1.84
E-0
7dh
(m)
2.07
1606
372.
193
3175
KT
hiem
(m/s
)8.
82E
-08
logK
-7.0
510
.895
3219
0.02
1534
64K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.48
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
012
67.4
3t1
5285
4.8
h1-1
.51
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
100.
82t2
5310
0.3
h2-1
.34
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
1.83
E-0
7dh
(m)
2.15
KT
hiem
(m/s
)8.
40E
-08
logK
-7.0
8K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.50
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
0.1
1.0
10.052
800
5300
053
200
5340
053
600
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2 0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8 1 52
000
5250
053
000
5350
054
000
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P39
0001
65.D
AT
date
6.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.5
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)0.
72 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)6.
94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)6.
94
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H0.
71
H0
-0.6
9
t 054
408.
6
t end
(s)
5449
1.9
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
83.3
T 035
.4
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)4.
35E
-06
logK
-5.3
6ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.0
2699
7335
-0.0
4348
3488
t154
429.
8h1
-0.0
42.
6156
7E-0
50.
0012
5988
t254
434.
5h2
0.05
0.99
970.
0118
899
Q (
m3 /s
)5.
26E
-06
dh (m
)0.
7110
6530
8.94
935
3K
Thi
em (m
/s)
7.39
E-0
6lo
gK-5
.13
150.
6024
367
0.04
9903
514
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
59S
tat t
ests
tig
ht
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
1032
.14
t154
413.
3h1
-0.5
0te
st s
tat,
b <>
034
.51
t254
436.
4h2
0.08
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
97Q
(m
3 /s)
6.79
E-0
6dh
(m)
0.92
KT
hiem
(m/s
)7.
33E
-06
logK
-5.1
4K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.59
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
0.1
1.0
10.054
400
5442
054
440
5446
054
480
5450
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1 54
000
5420
054
400
5460
054
800
5500
055
200
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P39
0001
66.D
AT
date
6.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.5
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)0.
76 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)7.
94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)7.
94
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H0.
75
H0
-0.6
7
t 055
454.
2
t end
(s)
5554
6.2
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
92.0
T 037
.5
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)4.
11E
-06
logK
-5.3
9ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-0.0
2471
2798
-0.0
7420
2207
t155
476.
4h1
-0.0
14.
8630
7E-0
50.
0025
8514
7t2
5548
1.1
h20.
080.
9985
0.02
5636
459
Q (
m3 /s
)5.
03E
-06
dh (m
)0.
7225
8239
.424
839
0K
Thi
em (m
/s)
6.96
E-0
6lo
gK-5
.16
169.
7221
935
0.25
6318
939
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
59S
tat t
ests
tig
ht
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
508.
17t1
5545
8.9
h1-0
.48
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
28.7
0t2
5548
4.8
h20.
14t-
criti
cal,
90%
1.97
Q (
m3 /s
)6.
47E
-06
dh (m
)0.
92K
Thi
em (m
/s)
6.97
E-0
6lo
gK-5
.16
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
59
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
0.1
1.0
10.055
450
5547
055
490
5551
055
530
5555
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1 55
200
5530
055
400
5550
055
600
5570
055
800
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P39
0001
67.D
AT
date
6.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.5
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)0.
70 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)8.
94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)8.
94
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H0.
65
H0
-1.5
2
t 056
849.
9
t end
(s)
5704
9.9
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
199.
9
T 044
819.
3
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)3.
43E
-09
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-8.4
6ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-2.2
3107
E-0
5-5
.128
62E
-05
t156
913.
4h1
-1.5
13.
6492
1E-0
74.
2009
4E-0
5t2
5691
8.1
h2-1
.51
0.81
580.
0006
1373
3Q
(m
3 /s)
1.04
E-0
8dh
(m)
2.16
3737
.882
284
844
KT
hiem
(m/s
)4.
78E
-09
logK
-8.3
20.
0014
0793
90.
0003
1790
8K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.72
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
061
.14
t156
854.
6h1
-1.5
2te
st s
tat,
b <>
01.
22t2
5691
5.7
h2-1
.51
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
1.77
E-0
8dh
(m)
2.16
KT
hiem
(m/s
)8.
10E
-09
logK
-8.0
9K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.42
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
0.1
1.0
10.056
700
5680
056
900
5700
057
100
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-2
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1 56
400
5660
056
800
5700
057
200
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P39
0001
68.D
AT
date
6.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.5
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)0.
72 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)9.
94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)9.
94
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H0.
71
H0
-1.3
9
t 057
899.
9
t end
(s)
5820
0.1
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
300.
1
T 015
954.
8
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)9.
65E
-09
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-8.0
2ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-6.2
5337
E-0
5-0
.002
2901
14t1
5799
7.3
h1-1
.37
2.83
857E
-07
4.90
461E
-05
t258
002.
0h2
-1.3
70.
9745
0.00
0875
737
Q (
m3 /s
)4.
71E
-08
dh (m
)2.
0848
532.
0769
612
71K
Thi
em (m
/s)
2.24
E-0
8lo
gK-7
.65
0.03
7219
958
0.00
0974
748
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
43S
tat t
ests
tig
ht
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
220.
30t1
5790
4.6
h1-1
.38
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
46.6
9t2
5799
9.6
h2-1
.37
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
5.28
E-0
8dh
(m)
2.09
KT
hiem
(m/s
)2.
50E
-08
logK
-7.6
0K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.39
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
0.1
1.0
10.057
650
5775
057
850
5795
058
050
5815
058
250
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-2.5 -2
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1 57
200
5740
057
600
5780
058
000
5820
058
400
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P39
0001
69.D
AT
date
6.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.5
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)0.
72 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)10
.94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)10
.94
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H0.
72
H0
-1.5
1
t 058
799.
9
t end
(s)
5900
0.0
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
200.
1
T 0-7
9135
09.4
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)-1
.95E
-11
logK
#NU
M!
ln((
H-h
)/(H
-H0)
) = a
*t +
bT
hiem
ana
lysi
s fo
r con
trol
ab
flo
w1.
2630
9E-0
7-0
.000
4513
78t1
5886
4.5
h1-1
.51
2.21
549E
-07
2.56
418E
-05
t258
869.
2h2
-1.5
10.
0004
0.00
0372
06Q
(m
3 /s)
-2.0
9E-0
8dh
(m)
2.23
0.32
5035
308
845
KT
hiem
(m/s
)-9
.30E
-09
logK
#NU
M!
4.49
942E
-08
0.00
0116
972
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
0.
00S
tat t
ests
tig
ht
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
0.57
t158
804.
6h1
-1.5
1te
st s
tat,
b <>
017
.60
t258
866.
9h2
-1.5
1t-
criti
cal,
90%
1.96
Q (
m3 /s
)5.
14E
-09
dh (m
)2.
23K
Thi
em (m
/s)
2.28
E-0
9lo
gK-8
.64
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
-0
.01
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
0.1
1.0
10.058
750
5885
058
950
5905
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-2
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1 58
500
5860
058
700
5880
058
900
5900
059
100
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OLP
P39
0001
70.D
AT
date
6.7.
2004
TOC
(m)
0.5
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
ope
n ho
le (m
)3
ref
toc
min
ope
n bo
re-
hole
pre
ssur
e (m
)0.
74 r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
92
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
92
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)11
.94
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)11
.94
tube
dia
met
er (m
m)
18.5
6
r (m
m)
9.28
H0.
74
H0
-1.5
3
t 059
650.
0
t end
(s)
5980
0.0
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
150.
0
T 060
038.
3
L (m
)1
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en ra
dius
R (m
m)
28
L/R
35.7
1
K (
m/s
)2.
56E
-09
T0
no
t re
ach
ed
logK
-8.5
9ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
a*t
+ b
Thi
em a
naly
sis
for c
ontro
la
bfl
ow
-1.6
657E
-05
5.84
739E
-05
t159
697.
3h1
-1.5
33.
4298
9E-0
72.
9744
3E-0
5t2
5970
2.0
h2-1
.53
0.78
870.
0003
7581
9Q
(m
3 /s)
-1.0
4E-0
8dh
(m)
2.27
2358
.492
523
632
KT
hiem
(m/s
)-4
.54E
-09
logK
#NU
M!
0.00
0333
113
8.92
635E
-05
KH
vors
lev /
KT
hiem
-0
.56
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
tte
st s
tat,
a <>
048
.56
t159
654.
7h1
-1.5
3te
st s
tat,
b <>
01.
97t2
5969
9.6
h2-1
.53
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
1.81
E-0
8dh
(m)
2.27
KT
hiem
(m/s
)7.
86E
-09
logK
-8.1
0K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.33
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/(
H-H
0)) =
-1
leng
th o
f mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for i
nter
pret
atio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref g
roun
d le
vel
wat
er le
vel a
t the
mea
sure
men
t sec
tion
afte
r d
istu
rban
ce, r
ef g
roun
d le
vel
tim
e of
dis
turb
ance
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
2
4.9
mm
and
inne
r dia
m 1
6.6
mm
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref T
OC
, top
ref g
roun
d le
vel,
mid
poin
t of t
he s
ectio
n
0.1
1.0
10.059
500
5960
059
700
5980
059
900
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-2
-1.5 -1
-0.5 0
0.5 1 59
300
5940
059
500
5960
059
700
5980
059
900
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Ope
n bo
reho
leM
easu
rem
ent S
ectio
n
PH
/Fin
tact
31.
5.20
05
Are
a:H
ole
:M
easu
rer:
Olk
iluot
o
PV
P2
Jere
Lah
denp
erä
Wat
er le
vel b
efor
e st
artin
g 0.
53 m
The
ref
eren
ce le
vel t
o de
pth
is to
p of
cas
ing
File
Dat
eTi
me
Dep
th
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
open
bo
reho
le
(m)
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
mea
s.
sect
ion
(m)
Pou
ring
wat
er/
Mov
ing
pist
onN
OT
E!
mea
sure
men
t/hol
e &
run
mea
sure
men
t de
pth
(m)
belo
w g
roun
d le
vel
mid
poin
t of t
he
sect
ion
KH
vors
lev
(m/s
)R
2K
Thie
m
(m/s
)flo
w
KTh
iem
(m/s
)tig
ht
com
men
ts
190
12.1
.200
513
:22
0no
t in
use
1.5
1.50
mO
LPV
P20
0019
0.D
AT
11.
27E
-06
0.99
861.
54E
-06
1.88
E-0
6T
0 no
t rea
ched
191
12.1
.200
513
:26
0no
t in
use
1.5
1.50
mO
LPV
P20
0019
1.D
AT
19.
27E
-07
0.99
381.
83E
-06
1.49
E-0
6T
0 no
t rea
ched
inpu
t file
OL
PV
P20
0019
0.D
AT
date
12.1
.200
5
TO
C (
m)
0.4 0
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1.
5
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)3
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)0
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1
tube
dia
met
er (
mm
)39
.19
r (m
m)
19.6
0H
0.07
H0
-0.0
780
t 044
394.
63
t end
(s)
4452
1.41
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
126.
78
T0
321.
85
L (m
)2
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en r
adiu
s R
(m
m)
28
L/R
71.4
3
K (
m/s
)1.
2732
5E-0
6T
0 n
ot
reac
hed
logK
-5.9
0
ln((
H-h
)/(H
-H0)
) =
a*t +
bT
hiem
ana
lysi
s fo
r co
ntro
l
ab
flo
w
-0.0
0310
5409
-0.0
0052
439
t144
435.
59h1
-0.0
60
3.63
146E
-06
0.00
0265
676
t244
438
h2-0
.059
0.99
8566
191
0.00
4313
245
Q (
m3 /s
)4.
10E
-07
dh (
m)
0.13
7312
65.3
385
1050
KT
hiem
(m
/s)
1.54
E-0
6lo
gK-5
.81
13.6
0452
083
0.01
9534
287
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
83
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
t
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
855.
14t1
4439
7.03
h1-0
.077
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
1.97
t244
436.
8h2
-0.0
59
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
5.35
E-0
7dh
(m
)0.
14K
Thi
em (
m/s
)1.
88E
-06
logK
-5.7
3
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
68
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref
gro
und
leve
l, to
p
ref
gro
und
leve
l, m
idpo
int o
f the
sec
tion
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref
gro
und
leve
l w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n af
ter
dis
turb
ance
, ref
gro
und
leve
l ti
me
of d
istu
rban
ce
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
56
mm
and
inne
r di
am 4
0 m
m
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/
(H-H
0))
= -1
le
ngth
of m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for
inte
rpre
tatio
n
0.1
1.0
10.044
350
4440
044
450
4450
044
550
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2 0
0.2
0.4 44
300
4435
044
400
4445
044
500
4455
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Mea
sure
men
t Sec
tion
PH
/Fin
tact
20.
5.20
05
inpu
t file
OL
PV
P20
0019
1.D
AT
date
12.1
.200
5
TO
C (
m)
0.4 0
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1.
5
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)3
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)0
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1
tube
dia
met
er (
mm
)39
.19
r (m
m)
19.6
0H
0.11
H0
-0.0
340
t 044
674.
13
t end
(s)
4478
3.55
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
109.
42
T0
442.
27
L (m
)2
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en r
adiu
s R
(m
m)
28
L/R
71.4
3
K (
m/s
)9.
2657
E-0
7T
0 n
ot
reac
hed
logK
-6.0
3
ln((
H-h
)/(H
-H0)
) =
a*t +
bT
hiem
ana
lysi
s fo
r co
ntro
l
ab
flo
w
-0.0
0223
0262
-0.0
1362
0219
t144
709.
22h1
-0.0
21
5.83
72E
-06
0.00
0368
532
t244
711.
63h2
-0.0
20
0.99
3845
618
0.00
5557
41Q
(m
3 /s)
5.01
E-0
7dh
(m
)0.
14
1459
83.2
057
904
KT
hiem
(m
/s)
1.83
E-0
6lo
gK-5
.74
4.50
8663
450.
0279
1986
7K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.51
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
t
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
382.
08t1
4467
6.53
h1-0
.032
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
36.9
6t2
4471
0.42
h2-0
.020
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
4.24
E-0
7dh
(m
)0.
14K
Thi
em (
m/s
)1.
49E
-06
logK
-5.8
3
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
62
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref
gro
und
leve
l, to
p
ref
gro
und
leve
l, m
idpo
int o
f the
sec
tion
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref
gro
und
leve
l w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n af
ter
dis
turb
ance
, ref
gro
und
leve
l ti
me
of d
istu
rban
ce
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
56
mm
and
inne
r di
am 4
0 m
m
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/
(H-H
0))
= -1
le
ngth
of m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for
inte
rpre
tatio
n
0.1
1.0
10.044
650
4470
044
750
4480
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2 0
0.2
0.4 44
550
4460
044
650
4470
044
750
4480
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Mea
sure
men
t Sec
tion
PH
/Fin
tact
20.
5.20
05
Are
a:H
ole
:M
easu
rer:
Olk
iluot
o
PV
P4A
Jere
Lah
denp
erä
Wat
er le
vel b
efor
e st
artin
g 1.
41 m
The
ref
eren
ce le
vel t
o de
pth
is to
p of
cas
ing
File
Dat
eTi
me
Dep
th
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
open
bo
reho
le
(m)
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
mea
s.
sect
ion
(m)
Pou
ring
wat
er/
Mov
ing
pist
onN
OT
E!
mea
sure
men
t/hol
e &
run
mea
sure
men
t de
pth
(m)
belo
w g
roun
d le
vel
mid
poin
t of t
he
sect
ion
KH
vors
lev
(m/s
)R
2K
Thie
m
(m/s
)flo
w
KTh
iem
(m/s
)tig
ht
com
men
ts
152
30.6
.200
415
:35
0no
t in
use
1.5
1.50
mO
LPV
4A00
152.
DA
T1
1.36
E-0
50.
9901
1.99
E-0
51.
96E
-05
inpu
t file
OL
PV
4A00
0152
.DA
Tda
te30
.6.2
004
TO
C (
m)
0.7 0
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1.
5
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)3
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)0
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1
tube
dia
met
er (
mm
)39
.19
r (m
m)
19.6
0H
0.71
H0
-0.3
770
t 056
020.
69
t end
(s)
5610
3.13
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
82.4
4
T0
30.1
5
L (m
)2
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en r
adiu
s R
(m
m)
28
L/R
71.4
3
K (
m/s
)1.
3591
8E-0
5
logK
-4.8
7
ln((
H-h
)/(H
-H0)
) =
a*t +
bT
hiem
ana
lysi
s fo
r co
ntro
l
ab
flo
w
-0.0
2713
6546
-0.1
8182
8539
t156
037.
68h1
0.14
3
0.00
0104
027
0.00
4955
275
t256
040.
12h2
0.18
7
0.99
0120
393
0.06
4707
62Q
(m
3 /s)
2.19
E-0
5dh
(m
)0.
55
6804
8.42
708
679
KT
hiem
(m
/s)
1.99
E-0
5lo
gK-4
.70
284.
9239
456
2.84
3024
701
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
68
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
t
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
260.
86t1
5602
3.14
h1-0
.264
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
36.6
9t2
5604
8.13
h20.
304
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
2.74
E-0
5dh
(m
)0.
69K
Thi
em (
m/s
)1.
96E
-05
logK
-4.7
1
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
69
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref
gro
und
leve
l, to
p
ref
gro
und
leve
l, m
idpo
int o
f the
sec
tion
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref
gro
und
leve
l w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n af
ter
dis
turb
ance
, ref
gro
und
leve
l ti
me
of d
istu
rban
ce
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
56
mm
and
inne
r di
am 4
0 m
m
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/
(H-H
0))
= -1
le
ngth
of m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for
inte
rpre
tatio
n
0.1
1.0
10.056
000
5605
056
100
5615
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1-0
.8-0
.6-0
.4-0
.2 00.
20.
40.
60.
8 1 5580
055
900
5600
056
100
5620
056
300
5640
056
500
5660
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Mea
sure
men
t Sec
tion
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
Are
a:H
ole
:M
easu
rer:
Olk
iluot
o
PV
P4B
Jere
Lah
denp
erä
Wat
er le
vel b
efor
e st
artin
g 1.
62 m
The
ref
eren
ce le
vel t
o de
pth
is to
p of
cas
ing
File
Dat
eTi
me
Dep
th
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
open
bo
reho
le
(m)
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
mea
s.
sect
ion
(m)
Pou
ring
wat
er/
Mov
ing
pist
onN
OT
E!
mea
sure
men
t/hol
e &
run
mea
sure
men
t de
pth
(m)
belo
w g
roun
d le
vel
mid
poin
t of t
he
sect
ion
KH
vors
lev
(m/s
)R
2K
Thie
m
(m/s
)flo
w
KTh
iem
(m/s
)tig
ht
com
men
ts
153
30.6
.200
416
:00
0no
t in
use
1.7
1.50
mO
LPV
4B00
0153
.DA
T1
3.06
E-0
60.
9988
3.72
E-0
64.
39E
-06
inpu
t file
OL
PV
4B00
0153
.DA
Tda
te30
.6.2
004
TO
C (
m)
0.86 0
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1.
7
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)3.
2
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)0
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1
tube
dia
met
er (
mm
)39
.19
r (m
m)
19.6
0H
0.78
H0
-0.2
290
t 057
330.
25
t end
(s)
5766
0.44
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
330.
19
T0
134.
10
L (m
)2
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en r
adiu
s R
(m
m)
28
L/R
71.4
3
K (
m/s
)3.
0558
2E-0
6
logK
-5.5
1
ln((
H-h
)/(H
-H0)
) =
a*t +
bT
hiem
ana
lysi
s fo
r co
ntro
l
ab
flo
w
-0.0
0661
9251
-0.1
1233
8131
t157
413.
36h1
0.27
0
4.41
217E
-06
0.00
0841
64t2
5741
5.74
h20.
278
0.99
8771
661
0.02
2193
483
Q (
m3 /s
)3.
78E
-06
dh (
m)
0.50
2250
682.
344
2768
KT
hiem
(m
/s)
3.72
E-0
6lo
gK-5
.43
1108
.575
142
1.36
3380
311
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
82
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
t
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
1500
.23
t157
332.
62h1
-0.2
01
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
133.
48t2
5743
9.68
h20.
351
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
6.22
E-0
6dh
(m
)0.
70K
Thi
em (
m/s
)4.
39E
-06
logK
-5.3
6
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
70
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref
gro
und
leve
l, to
p
ref
gro
und
leve
l, m
idpo
int o
f the
sec
tion
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref
gro
und
leve
l w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n af
ter
dis
turb
ance
, ref
gro
und
leve
l ti
me
of d
istu
rban
ce
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
56
mm
and
inne
r di
am 4
0 m
m
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/
(H-H
0))
= -1
le
ngth
of m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for
inte
rpre
tatio
n
0.1
1.0
10.057
300
5740
057
500
5760
057
700
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1-0
.8-0
.6-0
.4-0
.2 00.
20.
40.
60.
8 1 5700
057
200
5740
057
600
5780
058
000
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Mea
sure
men
t Sec
tion
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
Are
a:H
ole
:M
easu
rer:
Olk
iluot
o
PV
P11
Jere
Lah
denp
erä
Wat
er le
vel b
efor
e st
artin
g 0.
99 m
The
ref
eren
ce le
vel t
o de
pth
is to
p of
cas
ing
File
Dat
eTi
me
Dep
th
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
open
bo
reho
le
(m)
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
mea
s.
sect
ion
(m)
Pou
ring
wat
er/
Mov
ing
pist
onN
OT
E!
mea
sure
men
t/hol
e &
run
mea
sure
men
t de
pth
(m)
belo
w g
roun
d le
vel
mid
poin
t of t
he
sect
ion
KH
vors
lev
(m/s
)R
2K
Thie
m
(m/s
)flo
w
KTh
iem
(m/s
)tig
ht
com
men
ts
187
9.12
.200
414
:49
0no
t in
use
1.1
1.50
mO
LPV
1100
0187
.DA
T1
6.22
E-0
50.
9989
8.92
E-0
58.
81E
-05
188
9.12
.200
414
:56
0no
t in
use
1.1
1.50
mO
LPV
1100
0188
.DA
T1
5.24
E-0
50.
9994
7.52
E-0
57.
61E
-05
inpu
t file
OL
PV
1100
0187
.DA
Tda
te9.
12.2
004
TO
C (
m)
0.6 0
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1.
1
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
6
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)0
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1
tube
dia
met
er (
mm
)39
.19
r (m
m)
19.6
0H
0.38
H0
-0.1
050
t 053
470.
23
t end
(s)
5348
4.39
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
14.1
6
T0
6.58
L (m
)2
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en r
adiu
s R
(m
m)
28
L/R
71.4
3
K (
m/s
)6.
2235
E-0
5
logK
-4.2
1
ln((
H-h
)/(H
-H0)
) =
a*t +
bT
hiem
ana
lysi
s fo
r co
ntro
l
ab
flo
w
-0.1
5853
0077
0.04
3863
425
t153
473.
73h1
0.08
7
0.00
0490
795
0.00
4011
156
t253
476.
14h2
0.17
6
0.99
8889
412
0.02
1915
798
Q (
m3 /s
)4.
45E
-05
dh (
m)
0.25
1043
33.1
762
116
KT
hiem
(m
/s)
8.92
E-0
5lo
gK-4
.05
50.1
1145
210.
0557
1505
3K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.70
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
t
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
323.
01t1
5347
2.65
h10.
037
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
10.9
4t2
5347
4.94
h20.
135
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
98Q
(m
3 /s)
5.21
E-0
5dh
(m
)0.
29K
Thi
em (
m/s
)8.
81E
-05
logK
-4.0
6
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
71
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref
gro
und
leve
l, to
p
ref
gro
und
leve
l, m
idpo
int o
f the
sec
tion
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref
gro
und
leve
l w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n af
ter
dis
turb
ance
, ref
gro
und
leve
l ti
me
of d
istu
rban
ce
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
56
mm
and
inne
r di
am 4
0 m
m
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/
(H-H
0))
= -1
le
ngth
of m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for
inte
rpre
tatio
n
0.1
1.0
10.053
450
5346
053
470
5348
053
490
5350
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2 0
0.2
0.4 53
300
5335
053
400
5345
053
500
5355
053
600
5365
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Mea
sure
men
t Sec
tion
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
inpu
t file
OL
PV
1100
0188
.DA
Tda
te9.
12.2
004
TO
C (
m)
0.6 0
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1.
1
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
6
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)0
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1
tube
dia
met
er (
mm
)39
.19
r (m
m)
19.6
0H
0.40
H0
-0.2
100
t 053
848.
79
t end
(s)
5386
7.25
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
18.4
6
T0
7.82
L (m
)2
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en r
adiu
s R
(m
m)
28
L/R
71.4
3
K (
m/s
)5.
2435
3E-0
5
logK
-4.2
8
ln((
H-h
)/(H
-H0)
) =
a*t +
bT
hiem
ana
lysi
s fo
r co
ntro
l
ab
flo
w
-0.1
2144
4388
-0.0
5088
0858
t153
852.
57h1
0.03
6
0.00
0241
849
0.00
2598
179
t253
855.
05h2
0.13
3
0.99
9405
480.
0159
4203
3Q
(m
3 /s)
4.74
E-0
5dh
(m
)0.
31
2521
54.4
6815
0K
Thi
em (
m/s
)7.
52E
-05
logK
-4.1
2
64.0
8465
650.
0381
2226
1K
Hvo
rsle
v / K
Thi
em
0.70
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
t
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
502.
15t1
5385
1.32
h1-0
.031
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
19.5
8t2
5385
5.05
h20.
133
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
98Q
(m
3 /s)
5.31
E-0
5dh
(m
)0.
35K
Thi
em (
m/s
)7.
61E
-05
logK
-4.1
2
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
69
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref
gro
und
leve
l, to
p
ref
gro
und
leve
l, m
idpo
int o
f the
sec
tion
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref
gro
und
leve
l w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n af
ter
dis
turb
ance
, ref
gro
und
leve
l ti
me
of d
istu
rban
ce
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
56
mm
and
inne
r di
am 4
0 m
m
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/
(H-H
0))
= -1
le
ngth
of m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for
inte
rpre
tatio
n
0.1
1.0
10.053
800
5382
053
840
5386
053
880
5390
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2 0
0.2
0.4 53
750
5380
053
850
5390
053
950
5400
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Mea
sure
men
t Sec
tion
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
Are
a:H
ole
:M
easu
rer:
Olk
iluot
o
PV
P12
Jere
Lah
denp
erä
Wat
er le
vel b
efor
e st
artin
g 1.
80 m
The
ref
eren
ce le
vel t
o de
pth
is to
p of
cas
ing
File
Dat
eTi
me
Dep
th
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
open
bo
reho
le
(m)
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
mea
s.
sect
ion
(m)
Pou
ring
wat
er/
Mov
ing
pist
onN
OT
E!
mea
sure
men
t/hol
e &
run
mea
sure
men
t de
pth
(m)
belo
w g
roun
d le
vel
mid
poin
t of t
he
sect
ion
KH
vors
lev
(m/s
)R
2K
Thie
m
(m/s
)flo
w
KTh
iem
(m/s
)tig
ht
com
men
ts
189
9.12
.200
415
:32
0no
t in
use
1.9
1.50
mO
LPV
1200
0189
.DA
T1
1.84
E-0
60.
9090
1.72
E-0
64.
10E
-06
inpu
t file
OL
PV
1200
0189
.DA
Tda
te9.
12.2
004
TO
C (
m)
0.5 0
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1.
9
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)3.
4
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)0
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1
tube
dia
met
er (
mm
)39
.19
r (m
m)
19.6
0H
1.21
H0
-0.0
200
t 056
083.
88
t end
(s)
5630
0.02
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
216.
14
T0
222.
93
L (m
)2
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en r
adiu
s R
(m
m)
28
L/R
71.4
3
K (
m/s
)1.
8381
9E-0
6T
0 n
ot
reac
hed
logK
-5.7
4
ln((
H-h
)/(H
-H0)
) =
a*t +
bT
hiem
ana
lysi
s fo
r co
ntro
l
ab
flo
w
-0.0
0364
6319
-0.1
8711
0487
t156
200.
23h1
0.59
3
2.76
562E
-05
0.00
3438
337
t256
202.
75h2
0.59
7
0.90
8962
701
0.07
2214
76Q
(m
3 /s)
2.13
E-0
6dh
(m
)0.
61
1738
3.02
955
1741
KT
hiem
(m
/s)
1.72
E-0
6lo
gK-5
.77
90.6
5200
391
9.07
9265
406
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
1.
07
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
t
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
131.
84t1
5608
6.3
h10.
014
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
54.4
2t2
5615
4.71
h20.
469
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
8.03
E-0
6dh
(m
)0.
97K
Thi
em (
m/s
)4.
10E
-06
logK
-5.3
9
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
45
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/
(H-H
0))
= -1
le
ngth
of m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for
inte
rpre
tatio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref
gro
und
leve
l w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n af
ter
dis
turb
ance
, ref
gro
und
leve
l ti
me
of d
istu
rban
ce
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
56
mm
and
inne
r di
am 4
0 m
m
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref
gro
und
leve
l, to
p
ref
gro
und
leve
l, m
idpo
int o
f the
sec
tion
0.1
1.0
10.056
050
5615
056
250
5635
056
450
5655
056
650
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1
-0.5 0
0.5 1
1.5 55
800
5600
056
200
5640
056
600
5680
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Mea
sure
men
t Sec
tion
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
Are
a:H
ole
:M
easu
rer:
Olk
iluot
o
PV
P13
Jere
Lah
denp
erä
Wat
er le
vel b
efor
e st
artin
g 0.
89 m
The
ref
eren
ce le
vel t
o de
pth
is to
p of
cas
ing
File
Dat
eTi
me
Dep
th
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
open
bo
reho
le
(m)
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
mea
s.
sect
ion
(m)
Pou
ring
wat
er/
Mov
ing
pist
onN
OT
E!
mea
sure
men
t/hol
e &
run
mea
sure
men
t de
pth
(m)
belo
w g
roun
d le
vel
mid
poin
t of t
he
sect
ion
KH
vors
lev
(m/s
)R
2K
Thie
m
(m/s
)flo
w
KTh
iem
(m/s
)tig
ht
com
men
ts
184
9.12
.200
413
:28
0no
t in
use
11.
50 m
OLP
V13
0001
84.D
AT
19.
17E
-06
0.99
901.
55E
-05
1.21
E-0
5
185
9.12
.200
413
:41
0no
t in
use
11.
00 m
OLP
V13
0001
85.D
AT
19.
01E
-06
0.99
941.
41E
-05
1.20
E-0
5
inpu
t file
OL
PV
1300
0184
.DA
Tda
te9.
12.2
004
TO
C (
m)
0.6 0
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2.
5
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)0
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1
tube
dia
met
er (
mm
)39
.19
r (m
m)
19.6
0H
0.28
H0
-0.5
220
t 048
609.
95
t end
(s)
4871
0.25
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
100.
3
T0
44.7
1
L (m
)2
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en r
adiu
s R
(m
m)
28
L/R
71.4
3
K (
m/s
)9.
1666
4E-0
6
logK
-5.0
4
ln((
H-h
)/(H
-H0)
) =
a*t +
bT
hiem
ana
lysi
s fo
r co
ntro
l
ab
flo
w
-0.0
2323
691
0.03
8807
086
t148
678.
84h1
0.11
4
2.50
051E
-05
0.00
1448
256
t248
681.
25h2
0.12
4
0.99
9044
426
0.02
0856
005
Q (
m3 /s
)5.
10E
-06
dh (
m)
0.16
8635
75.9
455
826
KT
hiem
(m
/s)
1.55
E-0
5lo
gK-4
.81
375.
6321
644
0.35
9287
645
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
59
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
t
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
929.
29t1
4861
2.39
h1-0
.478
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
26.8
0t2
4864
3.3
h2-0
.115
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
1.42
E-0
5dh
(m
)0.
58K
Thi
em (
m/s
)1.
21E
-05
logK
-4.9
2
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
76
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref
gro
und
leve
l, to
p
ref
gro
und
leve
l, m
idpo
int o
f the
sec
tion
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref
gro
und
leve
l w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n af
ter
dis
turb
ance
, ref
gro
und
leve
l ti
me
of d
istu
rban
ce
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
56
mm
and
inne
r di
am 4
0 m
m
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/
(H-H
0))
= -1
le
ngth
of m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for
inte
rpre
tatio
n
0.1
1.0
10.048
600
4865
048
700
4875
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1.5
-1.3
-1.1
-0.9
-0.7
-0.5
-0.3
-0.1 0.1
0.3
0.5 48
400
4850
048
600
4870
048
800
4890
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Mea
sure
men
t Sec
tion
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
inpu
t file
OL
PV
1300
0185
.DA
Tda
te9.
12.2
004
TO
C (
m)
0.6 0
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)2
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)0
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1
tube
dia
met
er (
mm
)39
.19
r (m
m)
19.6
0H
0.30
H0
-0.4
100
t 049
376.
05
t end
(s)
4947
9.3
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
103.
25
T0
45.4
9
L (m
)2
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en r
adiu
s R
(m
m)
28
L/R
71.4
3
K (
m/s
)9.
0077
1E-0
6
logK
-5.0
5
ln((
H-h
)/(H
-H0)
) =
a*t +
bT
hiem
ana
lysi
s fo
r co
ntro
l
ab
flo
w
-0.0
2269
897
0.03
2663
064
t149
422.
54h1
0.04
5
1.86
251E
-05
0.00
1110
634
t249
424.
94h2
0.06
0
0.99
9424
021
0.01
6282
278
Q (
m3 /s
)7.
13E
-06
dh (
m)
0.25
1485
309.
678
856
KT
hiem
(m
/s)
1.41
E-0
5lo
gK-4
.85
393.
7742
883
0.22
6936
373
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
64
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
t
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
1218
.73
t149
378.
46h1
-0.3
68
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
29.4
1t2
4941
0.38
h2-0
.042
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
96Q
(m
3 /s)
1.23
E-0
5dh
(m
)0.
51K
Thi
em (
m/s
)1.
20E
-05
logK
-4.9
2
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
75
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref
gro
und
leve
l, to
p
ref
gro
und
leve
l, m
idpo
int o
f the
sec
tion
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref
gro
und
leve
l w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n af
ter
dis
turb
ance
, ref
gro
und
leve
l ti
me
of d
istu
rban
ce
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
56
mm
and
inne
r di
am 4
0 m
m
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/
(H-H
0))
= -1
le
ngth
of m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for
inte
rpre
tatio
n
0.1
1.0
10.049
350
4940
049
450
4950
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2 0
0.2
0.4 49
200
4930
049
400
4950
049
600
4970
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Mea
sure
men
t Sec
tion
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
Are
a:H
ole
:M
easu
rer:
Olk
iluot
o
PV
P14
Jere
Lah
denp
erä
Wat
er le
vel b
efor
e st
artin
g 3.
03 m
The
ref
eren
ce le
vel t
o de
pth
is to
p of
cas
ing
File
Dat
eTi
me
Dep
th
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
open
bo
reho
le
(m)
Dep
th o
f pr
essu
re
sens
or
mea
s.
sect
ion
(m)
Pou
ring
wat
er/
Mov
ing
pist
onN
OT
E!
mea
sure
men
t/hol
e &
run
mea
sure
men
t de
pth
(m)
belo
w g
roun
d le
vel
mid
poin
t of t
he
sect
ion
KH
vors
lev
(m/s
)R
2K
Thie
m
(m/s
)flo
w
KTh
iem
(m/s
)tig
ht
com
men
ts
150
30.6
.200
413
:33
0no
t in
use
3.1
1.50
mO
LPV
1400
0150
.DA
T1
8.25
E-0
50.
9959
1.22
E-0
41.
25E
-05
151
30.6
.200
413
:44
0no
t in
use
3.1
1.50
mO
LPV
1400
0151
.DA
T1
7.64
E-0
50.
9870
1.18
E-0
41.
19E
-04
inpu
t file
OL
PV
1400
0150
.DA
Tda
te30
.6.2
004
TO
C (
m)
0.7 0
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)3.
1
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
6
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)0
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1
tube
dia
met
er (
mm
)39
.19
r (m
m)
19.6
0H
2.34
H0
1.76
30
t 048
751.
36
t end
(s)
4876
0.02
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
8.66
T0
4.97
L (m
)2
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en r
adiu
s R
(m
m)
28
L/R
71.4
3
K (
m/s
)8.
2485
9E-0
5
logK
-4.0
8
ln((
H-h
)/(H
-H0)
) =
a*t +
bT
hiem
ana
lysi
s fo
r co
ntro
l
ab
flo
w
-0.1
9340
0111
-0.0
3917
6876
t148
753.
49h1
1.96
6
0.00
1469
309
0.00
7378
388
t248
755.
88h2
2.11
1
0.99
5861
486
0.03
2070
032
Q (
m3 /s
)7.
32E
-05
dh (
m)
0.30
1732
5.55
045
72K
Thi
em (
m/s
)1.
22E
-04
logK
-3.9
1
17.8
1910
215
0.07
4051
059
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
68
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
t
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
131.
63t1
4875
3.73
h11.
984
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
5.31
t248
754.
21h2
2.01
8
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
99Q
(m
3 /s)
8.45
E-0
5dh
(m
)0.
33K
Thi
em (
m/s
)1.
25E
-04
logK
-3.9
0
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
66
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/
(H-H
0))
= -1
le
ngth
of m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for
inte
rpre
tatio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref
gro
und
leve
l w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n af
ter
dis
turb
ance
, ref
gro
und
leve
l ti
me
of d
istu
rban
ce
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
56
mm
and
inne
r di
am 4
0 m
m
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref
gro
und
leve
l, to
p
ref
gro
und
leve
l, m
idpo
int o
f the
sec
tion
0.1
1.0
10.048
750
4876
048
770
4878
048
790
4880
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8 2
2.2
2.4 48
600
4870
048
800
4890
049
000
4910
049
200
t (s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Mea
sure
men
t Sec
tion
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
inpu
t file
OL
PV
1400
0151
.DA
Tda
te30
.6.2
004
TO
C (
m)
0.7 0
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)3.
1
dept
h of
pre
ssur
e se
nsor
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)4.
6
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)0
dept
h of
mea
s. s
ectio
n (m
)1
tube
dia
met
er (
mm
)39
.19
r (m
m)
19.6
0H
2.35
H0
1.73
60
t 049
444.
39
t end
(s)
4945
4.96
Tim
e ra
nge
(s)
10.5
7
T0
5.36
L (m
)2
scre
en d
iam
. (m
m)
56
scre
en r
adiu
s R
(m
m)
28
L/R
71.4
3
K (
m/s
)7.
6427
4E-0
5
logK
-4.1
2
ln((
H-h
)/(H
-H0)
) =
a*t +
bT
hiem
ana
lysi
s fo
r co
ntro
l
ab
flo
w
-0.1
7559
3517
-0.0
5848
7366
t149
446.
76h1
1.96
0
0.00
2145
944
0.01
3128
297
t249
449.
13h2
2.10
8
0.98
7027
263
0.06
2821
998
Q (
m3 /s
)7.
50E
-05
dh (
m)
0.31
6695
.456
515
88K
Thi
em (
m/s
)1.
18E
-04
logK
-3.9
3
26.4
2431
191
0.34
7301
105
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
65
Sta
t tes
tsti
gh
t
test
sta
t, a
<> 0
81.8
3t1
4944
6.76
h11.
960
test
sta
t, b
<> 0
4.46
t249
447.
83h2
2.03
5
t-cr
itica
l, 90
%1.
99Q
(m
3 /s)
8.45
E-0
5dh
(m
)0.
35K
Thi
em (
m/s
)1.
19E
-04
logK
-3.9
2
KH
vors
lev
/ KT
hiem
0.
64
end
of t
ime
rang
e us
ed to
line
fitti
ng
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e ra
dius
bas
ic ti
me
lag,
t co
rres
pond
ing
the
time
whe
n ln
((H
-h)/
(H-H
0))
= -1
le
ngth
of m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n
equ
al to
bor
ehol
e di
amet
er
Tim
e ra
nge
used
for
inte
rpre
tatio
n
ref
eren
ce w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n b
ased
on
phas
e 1,
ref
gro
und
leve
l w
ater
leve
l at t
he m
easu
rem
ent s
ectio
n af
ter
dis
turb
ance
, ref
gro
und
leve
l ti
me
of d
istu
rban
ce
equ
ival
ent a
rea
to a
dou
ble
tube
with
out
er d
iam
56
mm
and
inne
r di
am 4
0 m
m
initi
al, r
ef to
c
fina
l, re
f toc
ref
gro
und
leve
l, to
p
ref
gro
und
leve
l, m
idpo
int o
f the
sec
tion
0.1
1.0
10.049
400
4942
049
440
4946
049
480
4950
0
t (s)
(H-h)/(H-H0)
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8 2
2.2
2.4 49
200
4930
049
400
4950
049
600
4970
049
800
4990
0t (
s)
water level h (m, below ground level)
Mea
sure
men
t Sec
tion
PH
/Fin
tact
14.
12.2
004
Pu
mp
ing
Slu
gC
om
par
iso
nho
leda
te o
f sam
plin
gY
ield
Yie
ldw
ater
tabl
ew
ater
tabl
edh
leng
th o
utsi
de c
asin
gL
KT
hiem
TS
lug
test
LK
pum
p/K
slug
l/min
m3/
sat
sta
rt (
m)
at th
e en
d (m
)m
mm
m/s
m2/
sK
Thi
emm
PP
214
.10.
2004
4.0
6.67
E-0
52.
035.
903.
879.
001.
95E
-06
1.72
E-0
56.
6342
1E-0
69
0.29
PP
382.
12.2
003
0.2
2.50
E-0
62.
6411
.20
8.56
8.00
3.61
E-0
82.
92E
-07
1.00
988E
-07
80.
36P
P39
5.10
.200
41.
52.
50E
-05
1.15
5.69
4.54
9.00
6.05
E-0
75.
51E
-06
1.68
874E
-06
90.
36P
VP
1119
.10.
2004
4.8
8.00
E-0
51.
421.
780.
362.
001.
10E
-04
2.22
E-0
47.
52E
-05
21.
46P
VP
1211
.10.
2004
0.2
3.33
E-0
62.
093.
821.
732.
009.
53E
-07
1.93
E-0
61.
72E
-06
20.
55P
VP
135.
10.2
004
0.5
8.33
E-0
61.
442.
551.
112.
003.
71E
-06
7.51
E-0
61.
41E
-05
20.
26P
VP
146.
10.2
004
4.6
7.67
E-0
52.
443.
290.
852.
004.
46E
-05
9.02
E-0
51.
18E
-04
20.
38P
VP
216
.10.
1997
0.1
2.33
E-0
60.
511.
561.
052.
001.
10E
-06
2.22
E-0
61.
83E
-06
20.
60P
P4A
4.5.
2005
6.0
1.00
E-0
41.
257.
306.
052.
008.
17E
-06
1.65
E-0
51.
99E
-05
20.
41P
VP
4B4.
5.20
050.
71.
17E
-05
1.80
6.70
4.90
2.00
1.18
E-0
62.
38E
-06
3.72
E-0
62
0.32