smart-phone attacks and defenses discussion led by aaron isaki

37
Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Upload: felix-shields

Post on 17-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses

Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Page 2: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Authors

Chuanxiong Guo Microsoft Research Helen J. Wang Microsoft Research Wenwu Zhu Microsoft Research

Asia

HotNets III

November, 2004

San Diego, CA

Page 3: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Definitions

Smartphone – Mobile device containing both cellular components and Internet access, with powerful computing components similar to those found on desktop PC’s.

Smartphone Operating Systems (OS) “covered” in this paper: Symbian, Windows Mobile/PocketPC, Palm, and embedded Linux.

Page 4: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Problem

Smartphones are interoperable between cellular networks and the Internet and have the potential to be dangerous conduits for threats from the Internet to the telecom infrastructure.

Page 5: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Bridging the Networks

Page 6: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Powerful Smartphone OSes

Provide access to cellular network with cellular standards such as GSM /CDMA and UMTS.

Access to the Internet with network interfaces such as infrared, Bluetooth, GPRS/CDMA1X, and 802.11; and use standard TCP/IP protocol stack to connect to the Internet.

Multi-tasking for running multiple applications simultaneously (except for Palm OS).

Data synchronization with desktop PCs. “Open” APIs for application development.

Page 7: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Increased Threat

Inevitable software vulnerabilities in complex OSes

Always-on vulnerability to Internet worms Smartphone user population likely to

exceed PC user population

Page 8: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

History of Smartphone Attacks

Cabir, June 14, 2004 (Symbian OS worm)

Duts, July 17, 2004 (PocketPC virus) Mosquito dialer, August 6, 2004 (trojan

horse)

Page 9: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Cabir/Caribe Worm

Spread over Bluetooth Targeted Symbian Series 60 Proof of concept Messagebox payload, replication bug

drastically limited spreading

Page 10: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Cabir/Caribe

Page 11: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Duts

Proof of concept code Hand-written assembly for ARM

processors “This is proof of concept code. Also, i

wanted to make avers happy. The situation when Pocket PC antiviruses detect only EICAR file had to end ...”

Page 12: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Main Contribution

Presents a high-level outline of several attacks using smartphones on the telecom network

Telecom network was relatively safe Widespread convergence of Internet and

telecom networks on a single device increases threat to telecom networks

Page 13: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Main Ideas

Smartphones are the common link for the Internet and telecom networks.

Smartphones are portable computers and can be subverted to launch attacks on previously secure telecom networks.

Existing attacks that were successful on the Internet would cause much more damage and cost end users more.

Page 14: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Compromising Smartphones

“Attacks from the Internet” – viruses, trojans, or worms spread “the same way as PCs”

Infection from compromised PC during data synchronization

Peer smart-phone attack or infection (via Bluetooth or WiFi)

Malformed SMS text message [?]

Page 15: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Compromised Smartphone Attacks on Telecom Network

Base Station DoS Using eight smartphones for each GSM

carrier frequency can tie up a GSM base station

Call other phones, but do not answer the incoming call (to avoid being charged)

Ties up a time slot on each end for a minute, exhausting radio resources

Page 16: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Compromised Smartphone Attacks on Telecom Network

Call Center DDoS Using victims’ phones to remotely and

automatically place calls Significant numbers of zombie

smartphones would be needed to reach a cellular switch’s limited Busy Hour Call Attempts (BHCA) value

Page 17: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Compromised Smartphone Attacks on Telecom Network

Spam SMS Junk or marketing messages sent through

SMS Abundant SMS packages make it possible

to slip past owner’s notice “Good incentive to compromise

smartphones”

Page 18: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Compromised Smartphone Attacks on Telecom Network

Identity Theft and Spoofing Smartphones allow remote reading of SIM

card data International Mobile Subscriber Identity,

SMS history, and stored numbers the target

Attacker can use stolen identity

Page 19: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Compromised Smartphone Attacks on Telecom Network

Remote Wiretapping Passively record the conversations of their

owners Report back to spies Encrypt and tunnel the conversation with

other Internet traffic

Page 20: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Defenses

Smartphone Hardening Internet Side Protection Telecommunication Side Protection Cooperations between the Internet and

Telecom Networks

Page 21: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Smartphone Hardening

Attack Surface Reduction Turn off features not in use

OS Hardening Always display callee’s number Light up LCD display when dialing Export only security enhanced APIs to

applications Attacking actions should be easily

detectable by the smartphone user

Page 22: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Smartphone Hardening

Hardware hardening SIM Toolkit (STK) – API to securely load

applications to the SIM STK allows operator to provision services

directly to the SIM Combine STK and TCG’s Trusted Platform

Module (TPM) for hardware hardening

Page 23: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Internet Side Protection

Rigorous software patching Vulnerability-driven network traffic

shielding Smartphone ISPs (GPRS or CDMA)

should restrict Internet access unless devices are fully patched

Page 24: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Telecommunication Side Protection

Telecom traffic is highly predictable and well-managed (voice or SMS traffic only)

Abnormal blocking rates of base station or switch (DoS attack)

Abnormally high call-center load Abnormal end-user behavior

Page 25: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Telecommunication Side Protection Detecting abnormal end-user behavior will

require in-depth analysis Junk SMS messages can be detected the same

way as spam e-mail Methods exist to trace and limit smartphones

effectively Very expensive to put defenses into various

parts of telecom infrastructure Only a handful of telecom carriers, easy to

coordination between them

Page 26: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Cooperation between the Internet and Telecom Networks

Exchange known vulnerability and attack information to reduce vulnerable services

Advance knowledge of an attack on the other network can be passed along

Telecom’s blacklisted smartphones can be added to ISPs blacklists

Page 27: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Differentiating smartphones and other 802.11 clients

Assign unique IDs to all Internet wireless endpoints, creating a mapping between SIM IDs and Internet wireless IDs

Design smartphones to submit SIM IDs to APs for authentication

Page 28: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Modem-Equipped or VoIP-Enabled PCs

These PCs cannot access both networks simultaneously?

VoIP PCs lack SIM cards, so they cannot be spoofed

VoIP PCs send traffic through an IP-to-PSTN switch, which can limit rates

Smartphones are more popular?

Page 29: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Interoperation breaks design assumptions Telecom networks have dumb terminals

and intelligent networks The Internet is a dumb network with

smart endpoints The attacks listed were possible when

combining the smart endpoints with intelligent networks

Security must be considered before connecting any hardware to the Internet

Page 30: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Conclusions

Imminent danger of smartphone attacks against telecom infrastructure (privacy issues, identity theft, DoS)

Outlined some defense strategies Urge system architects to pay attention

to insecurity of the Internet when connecting new peripherals

Page 31: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Questions Left Open

With constant Internet available to smartphones today, how is this threat model changed?

Is Symbian Signed and Windows Mobile signed an effective countermeasure?

Page 32: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

My thoughts

Paper was very light on details, perhaps to protect smartphone users?

What about smartphones attacking other smartphones or Internet sites?

Smartphone bandwidth now hundreds of times greater than when the paper was written

Greater threat posed by VoIP, which connects to the telecom network as well, but has less restrictions on what those computers can do.

Many more smartphones available, but much fewer viruses reported. Smartphone security doing its job?

Page 33: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

My thoughts continued

Smartphone “Hardening” section was very weak. Code-signing with certificates now used

Clients today may run multiple SIM cards, or they could also swap them between multiple smartphones

Users would notice when their batteries died quickly or their bills came in

Page 34: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Smartphone Viruses evolve

2006 – Redbrowser.A Java Midlet sends SMS messages to a pay number while pretending to give free Internet over SMS (abusing J2ME)

Page 35: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Commercial Smartphone Spyware

Flexispy Hides from process list, no icon or UI Records details of voice calls, SMS

messages, GSM location info Hidden UI via special code Signed via Symbian Signed so no user

prompts

Page 36: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Flexispy Installation

Page 37: Smart-Phone Attacks and Defenses Discussion led by Aaron Isaki

Questions