smart portal state of good repair pavement and bridge · 2017. 11. 9. · hampton roads mark wagner...
TRANSCRIPT
Smart PortalState of Good Repair Pavement and Bridge
November 8, 2017
Today’s Agenda
• SGR Local Program Overview
• SGR Local Pavement• Overview
• SGR Smart Portal Review and Demonstration – Pavement
• SGR Local Bridge• Overview
• SGR Smart Portal Review and Demonstration – Bridge
• Questions and Wrap Up
2
State of Good RepairOverview
§§§§33.2-369(B) and (C)
3
State of Good RepairOverview -The Three Tests
4
State of Good Repair Local Pavements
5
Primary Extensions Paving Program Criteria
• Qualifying routes and scoring criteria remain the same
• Applications accepted on an annual basis to support pavement overlay, rehabilitation, or reconstruction projects
• Maximum request of $1M per locality, per year
• Roadway must have Combined Condition Index (CCI) rating less than 60
• Projects must be advertised within 6 months of allocation
• Maintenance of Effort Certification required
• Prioritize projects for funding based on technical score that considers pavement condition, traffic volume, and past expenditures
• Pavement condition (CCI) – 45%
• On the National Highway System (NHS) – 10%
• Traffic volume – 30%
• Prior expenditures – 15%
• Same criteria used to select projects for both State of Good Repair and CTB formula funding
6
SGR Pavement Locality
7
SGR Pavement Locality
8
SGR Pavement Locality
9
Applications the locality
has submitted will
appear here.
SGR Pavement Locality
10
ACP (Asphalt Concrete Pavement
CRCP (Continually Reinforced Concrete Pavement)
JRCP (Jointed Concrete Pavement)
View an existing application
Create a new application
Zoom to Map Segment
SGR Pavement Locality
11
SGR Pavement Locality
12
SGR Pavement Locality
13
SGR Pavement Locality
14
SGR Pavement Locality
15
Surface Treatment Or
Reconstruction
SGR Pavement Locality
16
SGR Pavement Locality
17
SGR Pavement Locality
18
SGR Pavement Locality
19
SGR Pavement Locality
20
SGR Pavement Locality
21
There is one error on the General Pearl. Click the pearl to correct error.
SGR Pavement Locality
22
SGR Pavement Locality
23
District and Central Office Pavement Workflow Summary
• Locality submits application during the application intake period.
• Localities may “unsubmit applications during the intake period.
• After localities submit their application it is routed to the District Validator for review and validation.
• During the validation period, the district reviews / validates the applications and communicates with the locality through comments in the Smart Portal and via phone to be sure all are in agreement of any changes.
• Communication should occur verbally and through the Smart Portal Comments. This is especially important if there are problems with the application.
24
Smart Portal District Local Liaison Contacts for SGR Pavement
25
State of Good Repair Primary Extension Contacts
• Contact Local Assistance with Application questions
• Todd Halacy, P.E. – 804-786-3438 [email protected]
• Yolanda Newton – 804-786-0334 [email protected]
• John Leonard – 804-786-3875 [email protected]
• Contact Asset Management with SGR Program questions
• Jennifer Ahlin – 804-786-6581 [email protected]
• Angela Quinn – 804-371-2978 [email protected]
26
SGR Pavement Questions
27
State of Good Repair Local Bridge
28
State of Good Repair (SGR)Locality-Owned Bridges
SMART PORTAL Work Notification Forms
November 8, 2017
C. Todd Springer, PE, Bridge Maintenance Program Manager
Kevin O’Neill, PE, Senior Bridge Maintenance Engineer
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesRoles and Communication
30
District Locality Liaison – Primary Point of Contact for Locality– District Validation of Work Notification Form
District S&B Engineer – Subject Matter Expert– District Review of Work Notification Form– May communicate with Locality, keep DLL in loop
Central Office S&B Engineer – WNF Intake
– CO Review of Work Notification Form
– Responsible for Scoring projects
– Communicates to District
Central Office LAD – Responsible for Overall approval
– Distribution of communications to localities & districts
– Communicates to District
Central Office AMD – Fund Distribution
– Needs management
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesDistrict Points of Contact
31
DistrictDistrict Structure & Bridge Engineers
District Locality Liaison
Bristol Gary Lester Matthew Cox
Salem Dean Hackett Anthony Ford
Lynchburg Frank Lukanich Jay Brown
Richmond Jeff Hill Scott Gagnon
Hampton Roads Mark Wagner Sonya Hallums-Ponton
Fredericksburg Annette Adams Susan Gardner
Culpeper Teresa Gothard Greg Banks
Staunton Rex Pearce Michael Branscome
NOVA Gary Runco Maria Sinner
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesEligible Bridge Projects
32
Requirements:
1) NBI Bridges National Bridge Inventory (NBI)
Includes NBI class Large Culverts
2) Bridge is Structurally Deficient (SD)
Includes SGR Scope for Closed bridges to re-open the bridge.
Otherwise advise of intention to abandon and remove
3) Owner is City, County, or Town (otherwise called Locality)
4) Only bridges included in the Needs analysis
July 1st of each year
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesEligible Bridges
33
1. Eligible bridges are from the FY2019-FY2024 Annual Bridges Needs Analysis
which determines the following for the SGR program.
- Fund Need
- Fund distribution between
- Pavements and bridges
- Nine (9) districts, and
- VDOT & localities
2) Needs Analysis is based on July 1, 2017 data.
- Taken from S&B Inventory (BrM 5.2.3 database)
Given the above:
- Submit Safety Inspection Reports for SD bridges ASAP
- VDOT Districts should promptly review SD Bridges and enter them into BrM
- Localities to confirm entry into BrM with VDOT districts prior to June 30
deadline
- Contact CO prior to June 30 if there are an issues
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesWork Notification Form
Required Fields
34
Required Information for the Work Notification includes:
• Short Project Description
• Detailed Project Description
• Project Cost Estimate
• Bridge Replacement Cost Estimate
• Desired Project Schedules for PE, RW and CN phases
• Other Fund Source(s)
• SGR Fund Request
• SGR Bridge Smart Flags for the SGR Prioritization Score
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesWork Notification Form
Short Project Description
35
Provide a “Short Project Description” as follows:
• Replace Bridge
• Replace Culvert
• Replace Deck
• Replace Superstructure
• Major Rehabilitation (Bridge)
• Rehabilitate Culvert
The above must include an SGR eligible scope:
• See S&B I&IM 95
http://www.virginiadot.org/business/resources/bridge/Manuals/IIM/S
BIIM95.pdf
• See presentation from last year for rehabilitation
http://www.virginiadot.org/business/resources/local_assistance/St
ateofGoodRepair/SGR_Locally_Owned_Bridges_Prioritization_Pr
ocess_-_Adam_Matteo_PowerPoint.pdf
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesWork Notification Form
SGR Funds Not Being Requested
36
Reason that SGR Funds not being requested:
� Bridge closed and will be abandoned
� Bridge will no longer be SD on 1/1/2018 by Change in SD definition
(see FHWA 23 CFR 490 for definition of SD post 1/1/2018)
� Bridge to be addressed with Other Funds
� Project Underway – Previously selected for SGR Funding
� Project Underway – Previously selected for Funding by Another Source
� Other – Justification must be provided in notes field
For Other, please specify with detail the justification for skipping the said bridge.
Projects previously selected for SGR funding
� Do not need a Work Notification Form
� Are not populated in SMART Portal
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesWork Notification Form
Detailed Project Description (Scope)
37
The minimum requirements for the “Detailed Project Description” is as follows:
• Proposed structure description *
• Proposed total project length between tie-in points
• Proposed total Structure Length *
• Proposed Deck Section description*, **
• Existing Roadway Section description on immediate approaches to bridge *, **
• Any significant project issues such as
• Right-of-way, railroad
• Construction restrictions such access in urban areas,
• Traffic concerns or
• Environmental problems
* If the scope involves a rehabilitation of the existing bridge, then only a detailed
summary of all significant repairs are required to cover these items.
** Include out-to-out width, number of lanes & lane widths, and widths of each
shoulder, sidewalk, shared-use-path, gore, median, etc.
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesWork Notification Form
Detailed Project Description (Scope)
38
The following documents with conceptual information are preferred
in lieu of Detailed Project Description:
1) Typical deck section of the proposed bridge
2) Typical existing roadway section of the immediate approaches
3) Plan view of the bridge site
4) Additional documents that could assist to describe the project
See State of Good Repair Bridge Project Guidance and Suggested Practices
http://www.virginiadot.org/business/bridge-manuals-default.asp
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesWork Notification FormProject Cost Estimate
39
• Provide Project Cost Estimate that corresponds to the project description.
• Estimates shall be completed using a VDOT PCES Workbook or equivalent.
• Estimates shall include ALL the following elements
• PE, RW, and CN phase costs
• Inflation applied to each phase
• Project contingency applied to all phases
• VDOT costs per the LAP Manual
• For both VDOT-Owned and Locality-Owned Bridges, once a project receives SGR funding, you cannot come back for more SGR funding.
• The locality is responsible for finding additional funding if the estimate
Increases.
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesWork Notification Form
Construction Phase Cost Estimate
40
Breakdown of CN Phase shall be as follows per PCES
• Bid Items
• Construction Engineering & Inspection (CEI)
• Contract Requirements (Incentives)
• State Police
• Railroad
• State Forces
• Project Contingency
Remember in include costs for inflation and VDOT Coordination per LAP
Manual.
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesWork Notification Form
Construction Phase Cost Estimate
41
Provide the desired Project Schedules for PE, RW and CN phases:
• SGR funding will be provided in the latter years of the SYIP.
• Assume conservative costs for inflation in the Project Cost Estimate.
• The schedule will be accommodated to the extent possible which may be
somewhat limited.
• If a bridge project is selected, the district and locality will need to revise
the schedule accordingly to line up with the funding.
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesWork Notification Form
Smart Flags for SGR Bridge Prioritization Score
42
• Smart flags address important information not available in databases.
• Supporting documentation for use of Smart Flag is required.
• Examples
• IF-2: Bridge is the only access to a hospital, school, military base, police station,
fire station, or critical government facility.
• DRF-1: A fracture critical element of a bridge that is in Poor condition.
• DRF-2: Bridge has a history of vehicular impacts due to low vertical clearance.
• SCF-2: A fracture critical element of a bridge that has significantly deficient vertical
clearance.
• SCF-3: Bridge has a history of accidents attributable to features of the bridge.
Details of the Smart Flags can be found in the
VDOT Structure & Bridge Division SGR Bridge Prioritization Formula document
http://www.virginiadot.org/business/bridge-manuals-default.asp
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesWork Notification Form
Important Field Definitions
43
Project Cost Estimate: The Project Cost Estimate for the Project Description (scope).
Bridge Replacement Cost Estimate: The BRCE is the Project Cost Estimate to
replace the bridge per an SGR eligible scope. The Project Description is a Bridge (or
culvert) Replacement then it will be equal to the Project Cost Estimate.
Other Fund Source: The locality may propose the use of an non-SGR fund source(s). If
proposed, the locality is responsible for providing these funds.
SGR Fund Request: The SGR Fund Request is the amount of funds needed in addition
to Other Fund Sources to cover the Project Cost Estimate.
Cost Effectiveness Factor: The Cost Effectiveness Factor is a function of the SGR
Fund Request and the Bridge Replacement Cost Estimate. The use Other Fund Sources
may improve the “Cost-Effectiveness Factor” (CEF) score and the overall SGR
prioritization score as outlined in the SGR Bridge Prioritization Formula document.
http://www.virginiadot.org/business/bridge-manuals-default.asp
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesWork Notification Form
Cost Effectiveness Factor
44
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesWork Notification Form Dashboard
45
SubmittingWork Notification Forms
Using SMART Portal
Perspective ofSubmitter
SMART Portal will be used for the intake of the Work Notification Forms
SGR Locality-Owned BridgesSMART Portal
Early Communication
46
1. Early communication between the Locality and Districts is strongly encouraged.
2. Districts should escalate issues to Central Office early on to assist in early resolution.
3. VDOT’s goal is that all Work Notification Forms are accepted.
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormDashboard
47
The SMART PORTAL website can be located at the following link:
https://smartportal.virginiahb2.org/
To Login, Click on the Applicant Sign-In button in the top right corner of the webpage.
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormDashboard
48
Select to view Eligible
bridge list
Not used in
SGR as eligible
bridges are pre-
determined.
Alerts and
Comments
requiring attention
About the SGR
Program and Contacts
SGR Work Notification FormDashboard
49
The dashboard will be pre-populated for each locality with the eligible bridges within the locality.
Status will change to “Ready for
Submission” when complete.
Once all are ready, a “Submit All
Forms” button will be available.
External link to SGR
Scoring Guidance
A Work Notification Form must be filled
out for all bridges regardless of whether or not funds are being
requested.
49
SGR Bridge Work Notification Form
After selecting the Work Notification Form to complete, the view below will be shown.
WNF Status
Click to enter
WNF Edit mode
3 Primary Tabs1. General
2. Location
3. Supporting Documents
1 2 3
50
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormGeneral Information
51
Below is a view of the General Information section.
Locality will be asked to input Contact Information for each bridge WNF.
Pre-Populated SGR Scores
Pre-Populated Project Information
External link to SGR
Scoring Guidance
Note the Cost Effectiveness Factor is not known at this stage of the form and requires your input.
BMS Cost Estimate for reference
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormStart of Questions
52
Locality to provide information relating to the Structurally Deficient status of the bridge. The section below is related to the NBIS standards and the inspection reporting being up to date.
Inspection report must be current, if not the Locality must make immediate arrangements with the District office to submit the report.
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormCurrent Records & SD Status
53
SD status of the bridge:
If No, you will continue to the next section and be able to submit the form as complete.
If Yes, you will continue to fill out the form in its entirety.
Exception: If a temporary bridge was put in place within the past 2 years to address to address an urgent concern.
Form must be saved.Toggle button to do a
check on all input fields.
Areas needing attention
will display in red.
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormSD Status and Request for Funds
54
The next section will be where you answer whether you will be requesting funds through the SGR program or not.
If answer is No, you will need to provide a justification for the locality’s plan to remove the SD status as shown below.
The dropdown box will have pre-determined selections developed by VDOT. For OTHER, you will need to provide a detailed justification for not applying for funds to complete work to remove SD status.
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormProject Scope and Smart Flags
55
Provide Project Scope and detailed description of the bridge project.
See earlier slide for details and requirements.
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormProject Scope and Smart Flags
56
●●●● Select any SMART Flags that apply. - You will need to provide supporting documentation later in the form
process to validate your SMART Flag selection.
- Smart Flags are not required and can be applied using your discretion
Detailed description of each Smart Flag, affect on scoring, and requirements if applying.
Documentation is required if selecting a Smart Flag
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormProject Phases, Schedule & Estimates
57
Fill in the following per project phase:
1. Preliminary Engineering (PE)2. Right-of-Way (RW)3. Construction (CN)
PE + RW + CN = Total Cost Estimate
CN Phase shown below. PE and RW are similar.
Dates are used to aid in the timing of available funds.
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormOther Fund Sources
58
Fill in any known funding for proposed project if not currently in VDOT’s Six Year Improvement Program or locality has already determined an alternative funding source:
1. VDOT SYIP Allocations if project is not new and has previously determined SYIP allocations.
2. Other Funds – RSTP, Local Funds, Revenue Sharing, etc.
Example: Years in which
funds are available and any
stipulations attached.
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormProject Funding Summary
59
●●●● If Scope of Work is Replacement, Bridge Replacement Cost needs to be equal to the Total Project Estimate. ●●●● If Scope of Work is NOT Replacement, Bridge Replacement Cost needs to be larger than the Total Project Estimate.
Total Funds must
equal the Total
EstimateThe Bridge Replacement Cost Estimate is required in order to calculate the Cost Effectiveness Factor.
It is a function of the SGR Funds requested and the cost to perform a complete replacement.
External link to SGR
Scoring Guidance Save Form and progress to next section.
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormLocation Map
60
●●●● The Location Section allows you to see a map with the location of the SD Bridge. Provided only as a reference. No input is needed.
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormSupporting Documentation
61
●●●● The Supporting Documents section is where you attach additional information.. ●●●● 2 supporting documents are required to proceed:
- Cost Estimate supporting documentation- SMART Flag supporting documentation●●●● Any other documents needed will be based on details provided earlier in the
Work Notification Form.
Click on the Browse button to upload the supporting documents needed.
The little red # will auto update to let you know required documents to attach based on WNF
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormSupporting Documents – Upload Screen
62
Once documents have been selected, you will need to click the Green Upload button for each document to successfully attach it to the form.
Must select Upload button after choosing the file
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormSupporting Documents – Upload Success
63
Notification if document has been successfully attached to the form.
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormReview Submission Readiness Screen
64
Once all documentation has been provided, the form can be reviewed for readiness submission.
Please NOTE: All WNFs for the locality must be submitted together and cannot be done individually. This step will only save the form in a submitted status on the dashboard while others are to be completed.
The check mark must be selected in order to Mark Form as Ready to Submit
SGR Funds are supplemental to your program and are not intended as a replacement.
The SGR fund request cannot be increased once they are distributed to the project.
Once all forms are marked “Ready to Submit”, as a group, the forms can then be submitted.
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormSubmit All Forms
65
Once all forms for the locality are in the Ready for Submission Status, you will need to click on the Submit All Forms button at the bottom of the dashboard page to advance them to the Validation Process to be completed by VDOT staff.
After all forms have been marked “Ready for Submission” the “Submit All Forms” button will appear.
SGR Bridge Work Notification FormQuestions
C. Todd Springer, PE
Bridge Maintenance Program Manager
804-786-7537
Kevin O’Neill, PE
Senior Bridge Maintenance Engineer
804-786-5964
66
State of Good Repair FY2019 Timeline
67
Timeline/Next Steps for Pavement and Bridges
• November 8, 2017 - Webinar for local governments
• November 9, 2017 – Call for applications
• November 9, 2017 – January 31, 2018 (Closes 5PM) –Application intake period and initial district review
• February 9, 2018 – District Review / Validation ends
• February 9 – February 18, 2018 - Central Office Review and Validation period
• February 19 - March 11, 2018 – Central Office Scoring period
• March 12 - March 29, 2018 – Temporary UPC’s created for draft SYP
• April 17, 2018 – Present draft list to CTB
• Information for draft is required about 1 month prior to CTB meeting
• May 16, 2018 - Present final list to CTB68
Questions?
69