so 618 interoganizational relationships

Upload: mavole

Post on 06-Apr-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    1/21

    Interorganizational Relationships

    Organisational Ecosystems

    Resource Dependence

    Collaborative Networks

    Population Ecology

    Institutionalism

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    2/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Interorganisational Relationships

    Increasing dense web of relationships among organisations

    Companies have always been dependent on otherorganizations for suppliers, materials and information

    How these relationships are managed is vitally important tothe organization affects:- Structure- Management of the environment

    Organizational purpose

    Organizations can choose to build relationships in manyways, such as appointing preferred suppliers, establishingagreements, business partnering, joint ventures or mergersand acquisitions

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    3/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Principles of Transnational Action /interorganizationalOrganizational relationship

    Major restructuration of existing inter-organizational relations will apparently

    not be feasible until catalyzed by the next major social crisis (so proposals forchange should concentrate on relations between organizations and not onchanges to organizations).

    Concentration of organizational resources is desirable but cannot beachieved by centralized coordination of organizations (unless the alienation of

    many potential collaborators is acceptable).Informational links should be substituted wherever possible for organizational

    links (since the latter tend to become clogged by personality, procedural andstatus problems).

    Participative involvement in programme formulation should replace mobilizedsupport for programme execution.

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    4/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Principles of Transnational Action /interorganizationalOrganizational relationship

    Organizational flexibility should replace organizational rigidity(to permit more rapid response to new action opportunities and topermit new organizational configurations to emerge quicklywherever required)

    Social realities should be considered more important than legaland administration fictions (to permit greater response to action-oriented commitment as opposed to status-oriented procedures)

    Meetings of organizational representatives should not bestructured to favour consensus formation in plenary, since it isonly very rarely that delegates come with a mandate to committhe organizational to any course of action (and most of the otherreasons for voting are purely symbolic and a waste of meetingtime)

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    5/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Organisational ecosystems

    Interorganizational relationships are the relatively enduring

    resource transactions, flows and linkages that occur among two ormore organisations

    An organisation may be forced into interorganizational relationshipsdepending on its needs and the stability of the environment

    Organizational ecosystem is a system formed by the interactionof a community of organisations and their environment

    A ecosystem cuts across traditional industry lines

    A company can create its own ecosystem it can be a retailer, awholesaler, a logistics company and an information servicescompany

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    6/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    The Changing Role of Management

    Within business ecosystems, manager learn to move beyondtraditional responsibilities of corporate strategy and designing

    hierarchical structures and control systems

    Rather than trying to force suppliers into low prices orcustomers into high prices, managers strive to strengthen the

    larger system evolving around them, finding ways tounderstand this big picture and how to contribute

    Co-operation and communication are the key elements this

    ties further into stakeholder theory and having the appropriatestructures/people/systems in place to deal with an outsideenvironment where the competition may be collaborators atdifferent times and at the same time!

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    7/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Changing Characteristics of InterorganizationalRelationships

    Traditional Orientation: Adversarial

    New Orientation:Partnership

    Suspicion, competition, arms length

    Price, efficiency, own profits

    Limited information and feedback

    Legal resolution of conflict

    Minimal involvement and up-frontinvestment, separate resources

    Short-term contracts

    Contract limiting the relationship

    Trust, addition of value to both sides, high

    commitmentEquity, fair dealing, both profit

    Electronic linkages to share key information,problem feedback and discussion

    Mechanisms for close coordination, people on-site

    Involvement in partners product design andproduction, shared resources

    Long-term contracts

    Business assistance beyond the contract

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    8/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Interorganizational Frameworks Resource dependence rational ways organisations deal

    with each other to reduce dependence on the environment Collaborative networks where organisations allow

    themselves to become dependent on other organisations toincrease value and productivity

    Population ecology examines how new organisations fillniches left open by established organisations and how a richvariety of new organisational forms benefit society

    Institutionalism explains why and how organisationslegitimate themselves in the larger environment and designstructures by borrowing ideas from each other

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    9/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    International origins

    Why the interest in interorganizational collaboration?

    - Sharing risks when entering new markets- Mounting expensive new programmes- Reducing costs- Enhancing organisational profile in selected industries or

    technologiesCooperative is a prerequisite (condition/requirement) for greaterinnovation, problem solving and performance

    Partnerships are a major avenue for entering global markets

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    10/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    From adversaries to partners changingcharacteristics

    Traditional Orientation Adversarial

    Suspicion, competition, arms length

    Price, efficiency, own profits

    Limited information and feedback

    Legal resolution of conflict

    Minimal involvement and up-frontinvestment

    Short-term contracts

    Contract limiting the relationship

    New Orientation Partnership

    Trust, addition of value to both sides, highcommitment

    Equity, fair dealing, all profit

    Electronic linkages to share key informationproblem feedback and discussion

    Mechanisms for close co-ordination, people onsite

    Involvement in partners product design andproductionLong-term contracts

    Business assistance beyond the conflict

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    11/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Population ecology Population ecology focuses on organisational diversity

    and adaptation within a population of organisations Population is a set of organisations engaged in similar

    activities with similar patterns of resource utilisation andoutcomes

    Organisations within a population compete for similarresources or similar customers, such as insurance companiesin the United Kingdom

    Innovation and change in a population of organisations takeplace throughout the birth of new forms and kinds oforganisation more so than by the reform and change ofexisting organisations

    New organisations meet the new needs of society more sothan established organisations that are slow to change

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    12/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Population ecology Why do established organisations have such a hard time

    adapting to a rapidly changing environment? Inherent limitations

    Heavy investment in plant, equipment and specialisedpersonnel

    Limited information Established viewpoints of decision markers The organisations successful history Difficulty of changing corporate culture

    True transformation is a rare and unlikely event in the face of allthese barriers

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    13/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Organisational form and niche Organisation form is an organisations specific technology, structure,

    products, goals and personnel which can be selected or rejected by theenvironment

    Each organisation tries to find a niche a domain of unique environmentalresources and needs sufficient to support it

    The niche is usually small in the early stages of an organisation but mayincrease in size over time if the organisation is successful. If a niche is notavailable, the organisation will decline and may perish

    From the viewpoint of a single firm, luck, change and randomness play

    important parts in survival

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    14/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Process of Ecological Change The population ecology model assumes that new organisations are always

    appearing in the population

    The process of change in the population is defined by the principles that occurin stages: variation, selection and retention

    Variation new organisations forms continually appear in a population oforganisations some forms may be conceived to cope with a perceived need

    in the external environment organisational variations are analogous tomutations in biology and they add to the scope and complexity oforganisations forms in the environment

    Selection some variations will suit the external environment better than

    others. Some prove beneficial and this are able to find a niche and acquire theresources from the environment necessary to survive only a few variationsare selected in by the environment and survive over the long run

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    15/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Process of Ecological Change

    Retention Retention is the preservation and institutionalisation of selectedorganisational forms. The retained organisational form may become adominant part of the environment

    Variation

    Large numberof variationsappear in the

    population of organisations

    Selection

    Someorganisationsfind a niche

    and survive

    Retention

    A few organisationsgrow large andbecome

    institutionalised inthe environment

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    16/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Process of Ecological Change From the population ecology perspective, the

    environment is the important determinant oforganisational success or failure.

    The organisation must meet an environmental needor it will be selected out.

    The process of variation, selection and retentionleads to the establishment of new organisation formsin a population of organisations

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    17/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Strategies of Survival

    Another principle that underlies the population ecology model is thestruggle for existence, or competition

    In the population ecology perspective, generalist and specialist strategiesdistinguish organisational forms in the struggle for survival

    Organisations with a wide niche or domain, that is, those that offer abroad range of products or services or that serve a broad market aregeneralists

    Organisation that provide a narrower range of goods or services or thatserve a narrower market are specialists

    Specialists are generally more competitive than generalists in the narrowarea in which their domain overlap. However, the breadth of thegeneralists domain serves to protect it somewhat from environmentalchanges

    Managers impact on company success often comes from selecting astrategy that steers a company into an open niche in the environment

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    18/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Institutionalism Institutionalism perspective describes how organisations

    survive and succeed through congruence between anorganisation and the expectations from its environment

    Institutional environment is composed of norms andvalues from stakeholders

    The institutional view believes that organisations adoptstructures and processes to please outsiders, and theseactivities come to take on rule-like status in organisations. Theinstitutional environment reflects what the greater societyviews as correct ways of organising and behaving

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    19/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Institutionalism

    Legitimacy is defined as the general perspective that an organisationsactions are desirable, proper and appropriate within the environmentssystems of norms, values and beliefs

    Institutional theory concerned with the set of intangible norms andvalues that shape behaviour, as opposed to the tangible elements oftechnology and structure. Organisations must fit within the cognitive andemotional expectations of their audience

    The institutional view also sees organisations as having two essentialdimensions technical and institutional. The technical dimension is theday-to-day work technology and operating requirements. The institutionalstructure is that part of the organisation most visible to the outside public

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    20/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Institutional Similarity

    Organisations have a strong need to appear legitimate Many aspects or structure and behaviour may be targeted towards

    environmental acceptance rather than towards internal technical efficiency Interorganizational relationships thus are characterised by forces that

    cause organisations in a similar population to look like one another Institutional similarity is the emergence of a common structure and

    appearance among organisations in the same field. Isomorphism is the process that causes one unit in a population to

    resemble other units that face the same set of environmental conditions This occurs through three ways mimetic, coercive, normative

    3/25/2012

  • 8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships

    21/21

    Mavole johnson, 2012

    Three Mechanisms for Institutional Adaptation

    Mimetic Coercive Normative

    Reason tobecome similarEvents

    Uncertainty

    Innovation,visibility

    Dependence

    Political law,rules, sanctions

    Duty obligationsProfessionalism

    certification,accreditation

    Social basis Culturallysupported

    Legal Moral

    Example Reengineeringbenchmarking

    Pollutioncontrols, schoolregulations

    Accountingstandards,consultanttraining

    3/25/2012