so 618 interoganizational relationships
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
1/21
Interorganizational Relationships
Organisational Ecosystems
Resource Dependence
Collaborative Networks
Population Ecology
Institutionalism
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
2/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Interorganisational Relationships
Increasing dense web of relationships among organisations
Companies have always been dependent on otherorganizations for suppliers, materials and information
How these relationships are managed is vitally important tothe organization affects:- Structure- Management of the environment
Organizational purpose
Organizations can choose to build relationships in manyways, such as appointing preferred suppliers, establishingagreements, business partnering, joint ventures or mergersand acquisitions
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
3/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Principles of Transnational Action /interorganizationalOrganizational relationship
Major restructuration of existing inter-organizational relations will apparently
not be feasible until catalyzed by the next major social crisis (so proposals forchange should concentrate on relations between organizations and not onchanges to organizations).
Concentration of organizational resources is desirable but cannot beachieved by centralized coordination of organizations (unless the alienation of
many potential collaborators is acceptable).Informational links should be substituted wherever possible for organizational
links (since the latter tend to become clogged by personality, procedural andstatus problems).
Participative involvement in programme formulation should replace mobilizedsupport for programme execution.
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
4/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Principles of Transnational Action /interorganizationalOrganizational relationship
Organizational flexibility should replace organizational rigidity(to permit more rapid response to new action opportunities and topermit new organizational configurations to emerge quicklywherever required)
Social realities should be considered more important than legaland administration fictions (to permit greater response to action-oriented commitment as opposed to status-oriented procedures)
Meetings of organizational representatives should not bestructured to favour consensus formation in plenary, since it isonly very rarely that delegates come with a mandate to committhe organizational to any course of action (and most of the otherreasons for voting are purely symbolic and a waste of meetingtime)
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
5/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Organisational ecosystems
Interorganizational relationships are the relatively enduring
resource transactions, flows and linkages that occur among two ormore organisations
An organisation may be forced into interorganizational relationshipsdepending on its needs and the stability of the environment
Organizational ecosystem is a system formed by the interactionof a community of organisations and their environment
A ecosystem cuts across traditional industry lines
A company can create its own ecosystem it can be a retailer, awholesaler, a logistics company and an information servicescompany
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
6/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
The Changing Role of Management
Within business ecosystems, manager learn to move beyondtraditional responsibilities of corporate strategy and designing
hierarchical structures and control systems
Rather than trying to force suppliers into low prices orcustomers into high prices, managers strive to strengthen the
larger system evolving around them, finding ways tounderstand this big picture and how to contribute
Co-operation and communication are the key elements this
ties further into stakeholder theory and having the appropriatestructures/people/systems in place to deal with an outsideenvironment where the competition may be collaborators atdifferent times and at the same time!
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
7/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Changing Characteristics of InterorganizationalRelationships
Traditional Orientation: Adversarial
New Orientation:Partnership
Suspicion, competition, arms length
Price, efficiency, own profits
Limited information and feedback
Legal resolution of conflict
Minimal involvement and up-frontinvestment, separate resources
Short-term contracts
Contract limiting the relationship
Trust, addition of value to both sides, high
commitmentEquity, fair dealing, both profit
Electronic linkages to share key information,problem feedback and discussion
Mechanisms for close coordination, people on-site
Involvement in partners product design andproduction, shared resources
Long-term contracts
Business assistance beyond the contract
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
8/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Interorganizational Frameworks Resource dependence rational ways organisations deal
with each other to reduce dependence on the environment Collaborative networks where organisations allow
themselves to become dependent on other organisations toincrease value and productivity
Population ecology examines how new organisations fillniches left open by established organisations and how a richvariety of new organisational forms benefit society
Institutionalism explains why and how organisationslegitimate themselves in the larger environment and designstructures by borrowing ideas from each other
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
9/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
International origins
Why the interest in interorganizational collaboration?
- Sharing risks when entering new markets- Mounting expensive new programmes- Reducing costs- Enhancing organisational profile in selected industries or
technologiesCooperative is a prerequisite (condition/requirement) for greaterinnovation, problem solving and performance
Partnerships are a major avenue for entering global markets
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
10/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
From adversaries to partners changingcharacteristics
Traditional Orientation Adversarial
Suspicion, competition, arms length
Price, efficiency, own profits
Limited information and feedback
Legal resolution of conflict
Minimal involvement and up-frontinvestment
Short-term contracts
Contract limiting the relationship
New Orientation Partnership
Trust, addition of value to both sides, highcommitment
Equity, fair dealing, all profit
Electronic linkages to share key informationproblem feedback and discussion
Mechanisms for close co-ordination, people onsite
Involvement in partners product design andproductionLong-term contracts
Business assistance beyond the conflict
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
11/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Population ecology Population ecology focuses on organisational diversity
and adaptation within a population of organisations Population is a set of organisations engaged in similar
activities with similar patterns of resource utilisation andoutcomes
Organisations within a population compete for similarresources or similar customers, such as insurance companiesin the United Kingdom
Innovation and change in a population of organisations takeplace throughout the birth of new forms and kinds oforganisation more so than by the reform and change ofexisting organisations
New organisations meet the new needs of society more sothan established organisations that are slow to change
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
12/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Population ecology Why do established organisations have such a hard time
adapting to a rapidly changing environment? Inherent limitations
Heavy investment in plant, equipment and specialisedpersonnel
Limited information Established viewpoints of decision markers The organisations successful history Difficulty of changing corporate culture
True transformation is a rare and unlikely event in the face of allthese barriers
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
13/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Organisational form and niche Organisation form is an organisations specific technology, structure,
products, goals and personnel which can be selected or rejected by theenvironment
Each organisation tries to find a niche a domain of unique environmentalresources and needs sufficient to support it
The niche is usually small in the early stages of an organisation but mayincrease in size over time if the organisation is successful. If a niche is notavailable, the organisation will decline and may perish
From the viewpoint of a single firm, luck, change and randomness play
important parts in survival
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
14/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Process of Ecological Change The population ecology model assumes that new organisations are always
appearing in the population
The process of change in the population is defined by the principles that occurin stages: variation, selection and retention
Variation new organisations forms continually appear in a population oforganisations some forms may be conceived to cope with a perceived need
in the external environment organisational variations are analogous tomutations in biology and they add to the scope and complexity oforganisations forms in the environment
Selection some variations will suit the external environment better than
others. Some prove beneficial and this are able to find a niche and acquire theresources from the environment necessary to survive only a few variationsare selected in by the environment and survive over the long run
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
15/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Process of Ecological Change
Retention Retention is the preservation and institutionalisation of selectedorganisational forms. The retained organisational form may become adominant part of the environment
Variation
Large numberof variationsappear in the
population of organisations
Selection
Someorganisationsfind a niche
and survive
Retention
A few organisationsgrow large andbecome
institutionalised inthe environment
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
16/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Process of Ecological Change From the population ecology perspective, the
environment is the important determinant oforganisational success or failure.
The organisation must meet an environmental needor it will be selected out.
The process of variation, selection and retentionleads to the establishment of new organisation formsin a population of organisations
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
17/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Strategies of Survival
Another principle that underlies the population ecology model is thestruggle for existence, or competition
In the population ecology perspective, generalist and specialist strategiesdistinguish organisational forms in the struggle for survival
Organisations with a wide niche or domain, that is, those that offer abroad range of products or services or that serve a broad market aregeneralists
Organisation that provide a narrower range of goods or services or thatserve a narrower market are specialists
Specialists are generally more competitive than generalists in the narrowarea in which their domain overlap. However, the breadth of thegeneralists domain serves to protect it somewhat from environmentalchanges
Managers impact on company success often comes from selecting astrategy that steers a company into an open niche in the environment
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
18/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Institutionalism Institutionalism perspective describes how organisations
survive and succeed through congruence between anorganisation and the expectations from its environment
Institutional environment is composed of norms andvalues from stakeholders
The institutional view believes that organisations adoptstructures and processes to please outsiders, and theseactivities come to take on rule-like status in organisations. Theinstitutional environment reflects what the greater societyviews as correct ways of organising and behaving
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
19/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Institutionalism
Legitimacy is defined as the general perspective that an organisationsactions are desirable, proper and appropriate within the environmentssystems of norms, values and beliefs
Institutional theory concerned with the set of intangible norms andvalues that shape behaviour, as opposed to the tangible elements oftechnology and structure. Organisations must fit within the cognitive andemotional expectations of their audience
The institutional view also sees organisations as having two essentialdimensions technical and institutional. The technical dimension is theday-to-day work technology and operating requirements. The institutionalstructure is that part of the organisation most visible to the outside public
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
20/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Institutional Similarity
Organisations have a strong need to appear legitimate Many aspects or structure and behaviour may be targeted towards
environmental acceptance rather than towards internal technical efficiency Interorganizational relationships thus are characterised by forces that
cause organisations in a similar population to look like one another Institutional similarity is the emergence of a common structure and
appearance among organisations in the same field. Isomorphism is the process that causes one unit in a population to
resemble other units that face the same set of environmental conditions This occurs through three ways mimetic, coercive, normative
3/25/2012
-
8/2/2019 SO 618 Interoganizational Relationships
21/21
Mavole johnson, 2012
Three Mechanisms for Institutional Adaptation
Mimetic Coercive Normative
Reason tobecome similarEvents
Uncertainty
Innovation,visibility
Dependence
Political law,rules, sanctions
Duty obligationsProfessionalism
certification,accreditation
Social basis Culturallysupported
Legal Moral
Example Reengineeringbenchmarking
Pollutioncontrols, schoolregulations
Accountingstandards,consultanttraining
3/25/2012