social network analysis for evaluation: open and closed approaches carl hanssen november 6, 2008...

12
Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) is supported with funding from the National Science Foundation.

Upload: peregrine-berry

Post on 26-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics

Social Network Analysis for Evaluation:

Open and Closed Approaches

Carl HanssenNovember 6, 2008

American Evaluation Association

The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) is supported with funding from the National Science Foundation.

Page 2: Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics

www.hanssenconsulting.com 2

Agenda

Context

Open & Closed Approaches

Strengths & Limitations

Page 3: Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics

www.hanssenconsulting.com 3

Context

Milwaukee Math Partnership Comprehensive Work in multiple schools Goal: Distributed Leadership

Life Sciences for a Global Community Institute partnership Work with 3 cohorts of 30 teachers Goal: Teacher leader network

Page 4: Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics

www.hanssenconsulting.com 4

Open Approach

Respondent pool defined by the organization

Clean slate

Interested in network members inside and outside the organization

Interested in specific individual roles

Page 5: Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics

www.hanssenconsulting.com 5

Low

Student Achievement:2007: 66% Proficient3-year trend: -9%

School n Total Named

Network density

Density in school

MTL Role--In Degree

MTS Role--In Degree

K 11 57 3.8% 13.7% 7.6 0.4

Average 23 66 4.8% 10.7% 16.5 3.4 SD 9.3 24 1.7% 2.5% 6.4 4.1 Median 23 64 4.1% 11.0% 15.0 1.4

Page 6: Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics

www.hanssenconsulting.com 6

High

Student Achievement:2007: 53% Proficient3-year trend: +3%

School n Total Named Network density

Density in school

MTL Role--In Degree

MTS Role--In Degree

G 32 79 5.0% 12.1% 16.3 5.4

Average 23 66 4.8% 10.7% 16.5 3.4 SD 9.3 24 1.7% 2.5% 6.4 4.1 Median 23 64 4.1% 11.0% 15.0 1.4

Page 7: Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics

www.hanssenconsulting.com 7

Closed

Respondents defined by cohort

Fixed slate

Interested in collaboration within network

Similar expectations for all members

Page 8: Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics

www.hanssenconsulting.com 8

Cohort 1

Page 9: Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics

www.hanssenconsulting.com 9

District A

Red diamond—institute participantGreen box – science teacherGreen square – other teacher (English, math, etc.)

Page 10: Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics

www.hanssenconsulting.com 10

Strengths

Open Flexible Reduces bias Focus on roles Track evolution over

time Informs action

Closed Clean data collection All participants are

equal Track evolution over

time Informs action

Page 11: Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics

www.hanssenconsulting.com 11

Limitations

Open Messy data Non-responses

Closed Limited scope Requires clean subject

lists Non-responses

Page 12: Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics

www.hanssenconsulting.com 12

Contact Information

Carl Hanssen, Ph.D.

Hanssen Consulting, LLC

1324 Lake Dr. SE, Suite 6

Grand Rapids, MI 49506

[email protected]

616-808-2867