social safeguards and involuntary resettlement monitoring ... · in preparing any country program...

i

Social Safeguards and Involuntary Resettlement Monitoring Report

Second Semi-Annual ReportJanuary 2019

Project Number: 43251-025Loan Number: 3123/8280-INOJuly-December 2018

INDONESIA: Metropolitan Sanitation Management

Investment Project (MSMIP)

Prepared by the Central Project Management Unit of the Directorate General of Human

Settlements, Ministry of Public Works and Housing for the Government of Indonesia and the

Asian Development Bank.

NOTE

(i) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.

This safeguard monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

i

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

AIF ASEAN Infrastructure Fund

AHs Affected Households

APs Affected Persons

APBD local government budget (Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah)

ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations

BAPPEDA Development Planning Agency (Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan

Daerah)

BPN Land Agency (Badan Pertanahan Nasional)

CAP Corrective Action Plan

CAS Conventional Activated Sludge

COI Corridor of Impact

CWS Collection Wastewater System

DDR Due Diligence Report

DED Detailed Engineering Design

DFAT Department of Foreign and Trade (Australia)

DGHS Directorate General for Human Settlements

DLHK Environment and Forestry Agency (Dinas Lingkungan dan Kehutanan)

EA Executing Agency

FBAS Fixed Bed Activated Sludge

GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism

GOI Government of Indonesia

IA Implementing Agency

IEE Initial Environmental Examination

IP Indigenous People

IPAL Waste Water Treatment Plan (Instalasi Pengolahan Air Limbah)

LAC Land Acquisition Committee

LARAP/LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan

LPIU Local Project Implementation Unit

LPM Community Empowerment Organization (Lembaga Pemberdayaan

Masyarakat)

LPMU Local Project Management Unit

MDG Millennium Development Goals

MSMIP Metropolitan Sanitation Management Investment Project

O&M Operation and Maintenance

PEMDA Local Government (Pemerintah Daerah)

PISC Project Implementation and Supervision Consultant

PPIU Provincial Project Implementation Unit

PPK Commitment Maker (Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen)

PLN state electricity company (Perusahaan Listrik Negara)

PPLPS Strategic Environmental Sanitation Development (Pengembangan

Penyehatan Lingkungan Permukiman Strategis)

PPMU Provincial Project Management Unit

PU Public Works

ii

RP Resettlement Plan

SATKER Work Unit (Satuan Kerja)

SEKDA Secretary of the City

SES Socio-Economic Survey

SHM freehold title/ certificate of ownership (Sertifikat Hak Milik)

SPS Safeguard Policy Statement

UPTD Local Technical Implementation Unit (Unit Pelaksana Teknis Daerah)

URP Updated Resettlement Plan

WWTP Waste Water Treatment Plant

iii

TABLE OF CONTENT

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................ 1

II. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS STATUS ....................... 2

1. Project Overview ..................................................................................................... 2

2. Project Progress...................................................................................................... 3

3. Institutional Arrangements for Involuntary Resettlement Implementation and Monitoring ............................................................................................................... 4

4. Updated LARPS, Incorporation of Safeguards Requirements into Project Contractual Arrangements.......................................................................................................... 4

III. INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT PERFORMANCE MONITORING ............................ 7

1. General Progress in Resettlement Plan (RP) Implementation.................................. 7

1.1. Issues Affecting Timely Land Handover ....................................................... 11

2. Resettlement ......................................................................................................... 11

2.1. Other Remarks on Resettlement .................................................................. 12

3. Income Restoration Program................................................................................. 12

3.1. Status of Income Restoration Program (for each subproject) ....................... 13

3.2. Consultation with Eligible APs ...................................................................... 13

3.3. Other Remarks on Livelihood Restoration .................................................... 13

4. Disclosure, Consultation & Participation ................................................................ 13

4.1. Consultations ............................................................................................... 14

5. Operation of Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) for each Subproject ............. 19

5.1. Narrative Summary of Grievances................................................................ 19

6. Other Issues.......................................................................................................... 19

6.1. Resolution of Issues ..................................................................................... 19

6.2. New Issues................................................................................................... 19

6.3. Institutional Matters and Capacity Training................................................... 19

6.4. Temporary Impacts during Civil Works ......................................................... 20

IV. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 21

V. APPENDICES.............................................................................................................. 21

List of Tables

Table 1. Project Overview, Snapshot of Project Progress ................................................... 3

Table 2. Status of Social Safeguard and Involuntary Resettlement Document .................... 4

Table 3. Disbursement and Use of Funds ......................................................................... 10

Table 4. Updated Resettlement Impacts ........................................................................... 11

Table 5. Confirmed Resettlement Preferences for Households with Fully Affected Houses...................................................................................................................... 12

Table 6. Resettlement Solutions Implemented for Vulnerable Households (Not applicable to Makassar, Jambi and Pekanbaru) ....................................................................... 12

iv

Table 7. Status of Resettlement Sites ............................................................................... 12

Table 8. Program Participation (Cumulative)..................................................................... 13

Table 9. Effectiveness of Income Restoration Program Activities...................................... 13

Table 10. Means of Disclosure of URP by Location ............................................................ 14

Table 11. Consultation/Information Dissemination Meetings Conducted During Reporting Period by Subproject ........................................................................................... 14

Table 12. Summary of Grievance Cases by Level of GRM ................................................. 19

1

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Indonesia has one of the lowest coverage rates of conventional off-site urban sewerage in Asia. Only 11 out of its 330 cities have partial sewerage systems, and only 2% of the national urban population is connected to central WWTPs; the remaining urban population depends on poorly constructed and maintained septic tanks and unlined pit latrines, which result in leachates penetrating the aquifers. The present sanitation services are inadequate and unintegrated, due to inadequate and poorly enforced regulations. The project will respond to the needs of urban communities (including low-income households) by constructing new separate sewerage systems and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), setting up local wastewater infrastructure management institutions, and strengthening the relevant regional government departments.

2. The project was approved on 31 March 2014 for $120 million ($80 million from the Ordinary Capital Resources and $40 million from the ASEAN Infrastructure Fund). The loan agreements were signed on 13 May 2014, declared effective on 9 July 2014, and scheduled for closing on 31 December 2020. On October 2nd 2017, the Project Implementation Support Consultant (PISC) for the project- Loan No. 3123/-I8280 (AIF)-INO. Metropolitan Sanitation Management Investment Project wasappointed by Directorate General of Housing Settlements (DGHS) to undertake tasks listed underContract HK.02.03/MSMIP-KONS/X/11/2017. The PISC contract currently applies for the implementation support requirements for the local governments of Makassar, Pekanbaru and Jambi.

3. During the period, contracts for SC1 and SC2 for Pekanbaru piping were signed on I November 2018. In addition, bidding documents for contracts B2 (Makassar Network) and NC (Pekanbaru Network) were approved by ADB on 27 November 2018.

4. Regarding DED of Pekanbaru WWTP, a significant issue has surfaced as to the suitability of the WWTP site for construction which is located in the floodplain of the nearby Sail and Siak rivers and comprising of 10-15 m of peat subsoil. PISC had expressed this concern to CPMU and Local Government. As there is no alternative site, CPMU requested PISC to proceed with the completion of cost estimates for the improvement works required which is expected to be substantial and will exceed available loan amount. In order to remain within the loan amount, PISC proposed to change the treatment process from the Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) to Fixed Bed Activated Sludge (FBAS) which has a much smaller footprint and correspondingly lower foundation improvement costs.1

5. The project is Category B for both environmental and social safeguards. There are no indigenous people that will be affected by it. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan2, and Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) for each of the Subprojects were submitted in 2012 and 2013. Due to the changes that had taken since then, it is imperative to update these documents during the detailed engineering phase.

6. During the period, the Updated LARP for Pekanbaru has been submitted and is under review by ADB. LARP formulation for Makassar was recommended by ADB on 5 October 2018 to address DED changes and impacts specifically on the access road to WWTP and Pump Station B. However, during Review Mission of ADB conducted from 9 November-11 December 2018, it was decided to formulate instead a due diligence report.3 In addition, the Aide Memoire also recommended the updating of LARP/formulation of due diligence report for Jambi specifically addressing land acquisition issue and mitigation plan to resettle one household at the proposed access road to pump station site.

1 Source: PISC Monthly Report No. 14, November 20182 Due Diligence Report in the case of the Makassar Subproject.3 ADB Aide Memoire of Review Mission, 9 November-11 December 2018, para 27, page 7

2

Land acquisition activities in Makassar, Pekanbaru and Jambi have been completed with only one remaining for Jambi which is the site for the access road to pump station that is expected to be completed in January 2019.

7. Full Disclosure and Public Consultation activities on construction design and plans including construction impacts and mitigation measures have commenced in the sub-projects specifically for Makassar and Pekanbaru.

8. Actual physical displacement or actual resettlement impacts are not anticipated in Makassar, Pekanbaru and Jambi as a result of changes in the DED.

9. As there are no vulnerable households found among the APs, income restoration program formulation and implementation for APs/vulnerable households is not anticipated in the 3 subprojects based on review and monitoring of LARP implementation.

10. It is anticipated that land acquisition and resettlement activities consistent with the land acquisition and resettlement plans including due diligence reports and corrective action reports will have been concluded prior to the commencement of construction activities in Makassar, Pekanbaru and Jambi.

II. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS STATUS

1. PROJECT OVERVIEW

11. Indonesia has one of the lowest coverage rates of conventional off-site urban sewerage in Asia. Only 11 out of its 330 cities have partial sewerage systems, and only 2% of the national urban population is connected to central WWTPs; the remaining urban population depends on poorly constructed and maintained septic tanks and unlined pit latrines, which result in leachates penetrating the aquifers. The present sanitation services are inadequate and unintegrated, due to inadequate and poorly enforced regulations. This results in limited desludging of septic tanks, inadequate septage treatment facilities, and fragmented operational responsibility. Improved access to safe

good progress has been achieved with respect to sanitation, in practice the available facilities are substandard, and rely on unsustainable septage removal and treatment facilities. As a result, there is significant environmental pollution, widespread contamination of surface and groundwater with the associated spread of water-related diseases, and high infant mortality. The inadequate sanitation systems and their resulting environmental and health impacts produce economic opportunity losses

gross domestic product. These issues can be solved by the introduction of (i) public sewerage and wastewater treatment facilities; (ii) an institutional framework for their effective operation and maintenance (O&M); and (iii) public awareness of good sanitation practices.

12. The project will support the Government of Indonesia in the improvement of urban wastewater services in the cities of Jambi, Makassar, Palembang and Pekanbaru, which currently lack any pipes sewerage and wastewater treatment facilities. The project will respond to the needs of urban communities (including low-income households) by constructing new separate sewerage systems and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), setting up local wastewater infrastructure management institutions, and strengthening the relevant regional government departments.

13. The project was approved on 31 March 2014 for $120 million ($80 million from the Ordinary Capital Resources and $40 million from the ASEAN Infrastructure Fund). The loan agreements were signed on 13 May 2014, declared effective on 9 July 2014, and scheduled for closing on 31 December 2020. The Government of Australia, through the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) provides collaborative financing of $36.37 million grant to finance (i) the preparation of detailed engineering design (DED) for WWTPs and sewerage systems in Makassar, and (ii) the DED and capital costs for WWTP, pump station and construction supervision in Palembang. The central

3

government provides $98.14 million equivalent to finance DED in Jambi and Pekanbaru, collection systems in Jambi, Makassar, Palembang, and Pekanbaru, awareness campaign, taxes and duties, and financial charges. The participating cities provide $55.57 million equivalent to finance land acquisition, involuntary resettlements, property connections and construction of community-based sanitation systems and in Palembang in particular, collection system in the north catchment area.

2. PROJECT PROGRESS

14. On October 2, 2017, the Project Implementation Support Consultant (PISC) for the project- Loan No. 3123/-I8280 (AIF)-INO. Metropolitan Sanitation Management Investment Project wasappointed by Directorate General of Housing Settlements (DGHS) to undertake tasks listed underContract HK.02.03/MSMIP-KONS/X/11/2017. The PISC consists of lead Consultant SMECInternational Pty Ltd in joint venture with Stantec Australia Pty Ltd (ex-MWH) and in association withthe following firms as sub-consultants: PT. Infra Tama Yakti (ITY), PT. SMEC Denka Indonesia, PT.Amurwa International and PT. Widya Graha Asana (WGA).

15. The Contract will run from October 2, 2017 to January 2, 2021 which is a reduced 40- month period from the 48 month period defined in the RFP.

16. During the period, contracts for SC1 and SC2 for Pekanbaru piping were signed on 1November 2018. In addition, bidding documents for contracts B2 (Makassar Network) and NC (Pekanbaru Network) were approved by ADB on 27 November 2018.

17. Regarding DED of Pekanbaru WWTP, a significant issue has surfaced as to the suitability of the WWTP site for construction which is located in the floodplain of the nearby Sail and Siak rivers and comprising of 10-15 m of peat subsoil. The site was flooded sometime in November 2018 which further supports findings that the site is not suitable for WWTP construction. PISC had expressed this concern to CPMU and Local Government. As there is no alternative site, CPMU requested PISC to proceed with the completion of cost estimates for the improvement works required which is expected to be substantial and will exceed available loan amount. In order to remain within the loan amount, PISC proposed to change the treatment process from the Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) to Fixed Bed Activated Sludge (FBAS) which has a much smaller footprint and correspondingly lower foundation improvement costs.4

18. The table below summarizes the status of the project:

Table 1. Project Overview, Snapshot of Project Progress

Project Number and Title:

ADB Loan No. 3123-INO Metropolitan Sanitation Management Investment Project (MSMIP)

Safeguards Category

Environment B

Indigenous Peoples Not applicable

Involuntary Resettlement

B

Reporting period: July-December 2018

Last report date: November 26, 2018

Key sub-project activities since last report:

Contract awarding: 02 October 2017 for the Project Implementation Support Consultant (PISC) for the project - Loan No. 3123-INO. Metropolitan Sanitation Management Investment Project to undertake tasks listed under Contract HK.02.03/MSMIPKONS/X/11/2017. The PISC consists of lead Consultant SMEC International Pty Ltd in joint venture with Stantec Australia Pty Ltd (ex-MWH) and in association with the following firms as subconsultants: PT. Infra Tama Yakti (ITY), PT. SMEC Denka Indonesia, PT. Amurwa International and

4 Source: PISC Monthly Report No. 14, November 2018

4

PT. Widya Graha Asana (WGA). No civil works contracts have been tendered and awarded for the project during this period.

Progress of Work: PISC No civil works involved as of current reporting period(0 % physical completion).Status of Safeguard Approvals/Permits/Consents: Updated LARP Pekanbaru document is under review; Updating LARP or due diligence report for Jambi and due diligence report and corrective action report for Makassar are being prepared. There have been changes in the wastewater treatment plan (WWTP) technologies; The City of Makassar (Losari) WWTP will utilize a Moving Bed Film Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) while the cities of Pekanbaru and Jambi may adoptthe FBAS instead of the previously selected CAS technology.

Report prepared by:Central Project Management Unit with assistance from the Project Implementation Support Consultant (PISC)5

Source: Table template provided by ADB. Contents provided by PISC

19. This is the second Semi-annual Monitoring Report on Involuntary Resettlement covering the period 01 July to 31 December 2018. It is prepared by the CPMU and submitted to ADB in accordance with the safeguard monitoring and reporting requirements set out in the Project Administration Manual, Project Grant Agreement as well as the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 (SPS). The new internal monitoring format as recommended by ADB in October 2018 has been used in this report.

20. The main report describes progress in Makassar, Pekanbaru and Jambi subprojects only. Attached to this report is the progress of Palembang subproject as described in Appendix 17 (LARP Implementation Report November 2017); Appendix 18 (Post-Relocation SES Results March 2018) and Appendix 19 (Post-Relocation SES Results September 2018).

3. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING

21. The institutional arrangements described in the 1st semi-annual report remain basically the same except for 2 changes agreed to be adopted in order to simplify project organization and improve coordination6. It was agreed that Local Project Management Unit (LPMU) and Local Project Implementing Unit (LPIU) will be merged and named as LPIU. It was also agreed to merge PPIUs and PPMUs as PPMU. DGHS will resend letters reminding provincial governments on the roles of PPMUs/PPIUs.7

4. UPDATED LARPS, INCORPORATION OF SAFEGUARDS REQUIREMENTS INTO PROJECT CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS

22. The table below indicates the status of the Safeguard documents submitted, updated and approved by the ADB.

Table 2. Status of Social Safeguard and Involuntary Resettlement Document

Safeguard DocumentDate

Submitted to ADB

Updated by PISC

Approved by ADB Remarks

a) Updated Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) & DDR

- Pekanbaru 2 November2018 then

Waiting for approval

5 SMEC International Pty Ltd (SMEC) in joint venture with Stantec Australia Pty. Ltd (ex-MWH Australia Pty Ltd) and in association with the following Sub-consultants: PT. Infra Tama Yakti (ITY), PT. SMEC Denka Indonesia (SMEC Denka), PT. Amurwa International, and PT. Widya Graha Asana (WGA).6 Source: ADB Aide Memoire of Review Mission, 9 November-11 December 20187 Ibid

5

Safeguard DocumentDate

Submitted to ADB

Updated by PISC

Approved by ADB Remarks

revised based on ADB

comments and re-

submitted on 27 Dec 2018

- Jambi On-going with updated project

inputs to be incorporated

Not applicable at

this time

b) Due Diligence Reports for Makassar

- 2013 DDR and CAP

- DDR and CAP following DED changes and street vendor issue8

Preparation is on-going

Not applicable at

this time

c) 1st Semi-Annual Monitoring Report on Involuntary Resettlement

9 Nov 2018 Revised draft that included Palembang

was submitted to CPMU on 23 October 2018

16 January 2019

Source: PISC

23. The initial LARP of Pekanbaru prepared in 2012 indicated that 5 households will be losing more than 10% of their income as a result of the land acquisition for the WWTP site. During the updating of the LARP, the incumbent RT and RW and the former RT said that based on their knowledge, all of the affected households have more than recovered the income they anticipated to lose after using and investing the compensation they received on economic endeavors. Actual interviews with some AHs confirmed this information9. The 2013 LARP of Pekanbaru also indicated that there are no vulnerable households affected by the land acquisition for the WWTP site which was validated and confirmed during the updating of the LARP. The latest draft of the updated LARP of Pekanbaru was submitted to ADB by CPMU on 27 December 2018 for review and approval.

24. With the change in the treatment process for the WWTP to MBBR, a new route for installation of the pumping main, Pumping Station B to WWTP, has to be designed. On 5 October 2015, ADB advised CPMU and PISC to prepare a LARP for Makassar that will incorporate changes in the DED with new impacts identified that have not been included in the 2013 DDR and CAP. The street vendors that will be affected by the proposed access road to Pump Station B and the potential impacts of the proposed route for the access to WWTP which will be traversing a private land were identified as the focus of the LARP.

25. In order to avoid land acquisition, PISC proposed an alternative route to access WWTP which was presented and discussed during the 6 November 2018 Coordination Meeting attended by the head of CPMU, representatives from the Local Government (Satker, PU, Bappeda, BPN) and concerned Camats and Lurahs (see Appendix 8 for MoM). In that meeting, a consensus was reached to adopt the alternative route. Appendix 14 is the map showing the alternative route and Appendix 15 presents the letter of approval from Satker and PPK of the alternative route forwarded to PISC.

26. Previous ADB Review Missions in late 2017 and 2018 mentioned the need to formulate mitigation and resettlement plan for street vendors who are currently occupying the proposed site for

8 Recommended by ADB based on its review mission conducted from 9 November to 11 December 2018.9 See page 8 of Updated LARP of Pekanbaru, October 2018

6

the access to Pump Station B. However, during a recent field visit to the site conducted by ADB Review Mission members in November 2018, it was noted that there are no street vendors found though their stalls are still there. PISC field team conducted site inspection and interviewed the street vendors on 15 November 2018. The following are the findings and conclusion of the said inspection and interviews:

(i) No land acquisition is necessary on the land occupied by all 5 street vendors since the main sewer pipe is expected to be installed by trenchless technology, probably micro-tunneling (approx. 10m deep). This means that the street vendors can continue to operate during the work;

(ii) 4 of the 5 street vendors do not require any relocation;(iii) 1 of the street vendors (Pak Yono) may require temporary relocation to enable the

installation of the pumping main. This work may only take a week or so to complete. However, this street vendostaff. Based on information gathered, he has other work as a car park attendant and a GRAB motorcycle taxi driver; and

(iv) The street vendors may be positively impacted during the construction of Pumping Station B. The construction team and manpower are likely to purchase food and beverages from the street vendors who are understood to sell tea, coffee and snacks

27. As a result of the findings in recent site inspections, ADB advised the Local Government tosubmit justification letter to ADB for the cancellation of LARP formulation for Makassar earlier recommended on 5 October 2018. In addition, ADB in its Aide Memoire recommended instead the submission of a short diligence report relative to this issue.10

28. During the period, Jambi has already submitted the land titles for the WWTP and pump station sites issued by BPN though the proof of payment for the pump station has not been submitted yet. Appendix 1 and 2 shows both the land certificate titles. Due diligence and updating of LARP could not be done during this period because SES and due diligence interviews have yet to be completed. Local Government representatives have been busy and PISC could not facilitate the process because its field office and staff have yet to be opened and deployed in Jambi. It is important to mention here that at this stage, there are no specific social safeguards staff deployed in the subprojects. Only the PR of Sanitation Marketing Specialists have been deployed in Makassar and Pekanbaru. PISC, through the PR staff, is assisting LPMU in gathering LARP implementation data based on the internal monitoring data format provided by ADB.

10 ADB Aide Memoire of Review Mission from 9 November-11 December 2018, para 27, page 7

7

III. INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT PERFORMANCE MONITORING

29. The following present status of LARP implementation in Makassar, Pekanbaru and Jambi using the internal monitoring template of ADB:

1. GENERAL PROGRESS IN RESETTLEMENT PLAN (RP) IMPLEMENTATION

Table 1. General Progress in Land Clearance and Handing Over of Land for Civil Works

11 {Note there may be cases of partial handover such as sections which had no resettlement impacts or those for which certain sections were cleared before others. Thus, the column headings may need to be adjusted depending on the nature of the project and loan conditions. Narrative of partial handover of land that had no resettlement impacts may be warranted.}12 {This will vary according to loan conditions e.g. no award of works contracts prior to approved updated RP, notice to proceed (NTP) for civil works, partial site possession possible, etc.}

Project Component/

Location [District/ Village,

etc.]

AHs eligible for compensationa and/or

assistance/allowancesb

AHs required to relocate Remaining encumbrances

[Yes/No]

Land handed over for civil works

No. of AHs No. of AHs fully paid %Pro

gress

Total No. of AHs No. of AHs

resettledc%

Progress

Date handed over11

Expected date to

hand over

Civil works

contract awarddate12

TotalAHs

No.IPAH

No. of Female-headed

AH

TotalAHs

No.IP AH


AH

TotalAHs

No.IP AH


AH

TotalAHs

No.IP AH


AH

Component A (WWTP and its access road)Makassar 4 0 No data 4 0 No data 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% NA The documents

given to BPN for land title

processing

Q1 2019 Not yet

Pekanbaru 27 0 7 27 0 7 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA The documents given to BPN for

land title processing

Q1 2019 Not yet

Jambi 4 0 0 4 0 4 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% NA WWTP land title was issued by

BPN on 12 Dec 2018.

Not yet

Component B (Pump Station and its access road)

8

AH = affected household IP = Indigenous Peoples

a. All forms of compensation, including affected assets (land/ non-land, crops, etc.) or loss of income

b. Includes all types of allowances and assistance except income restoration, which is presented separately in Section III below

c. Includes households (HHs) provided interim measures agreed in RP such as rental assistance while waiting for completion of resettlement site

13 To be confirmed based on outcome of DDR and CAP to be submitted in January 201914 A letter dated 15 June 2017 from Regional Secretary of South Sulawesi Province LG to Mayor of Makassar regarding the permission to use 800m2 land of South Selatan LG asset for the pump house of WWTP Losari

Makassar 1 street vendor (Pak

Yono)13

0 0 - (the land

belongs to the city

government)

- - 0% 1 0 0 0 0 0 0% NA 15 June 201714 Not yet

Pekanbaru 1 0 0 1 0 0 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% NA Payment completed on 10

Dec 2018

Q2 2019 Not yet

Jambi 2 (1 for pump

station and 1 for access

to pump station will

be acquired)

no data

No data 1 0 No data 50% 1 0 0 0 0 0 0% NA Land title for pump station land was issued on 13 Dec 2018, but the

receipt of payment has not been submitted by Jambi Public Works Agency

Q1 2019 Not yet

Total

9

30. The following paragraphs give clarifications on the data above:

31. Based on the 2013 DDR and CAP of Makassar, there are 4 AHs and 1 private institution who are affected by land acquisition wherein only the 4 AHs have been compensated. Due to a change in the treatment process brought about by the new effluent standards issued by the Department of Environment in 2016, the land belonging to a private institution (9.974 m2) is no longer required. Total land acquired and compensated for the WWTP site 5.1443 ha. The proofs of payment can be seen in the Appendix 1 of 1st semi-annual report (Jan-June 2018) and 2013 DDR&CAP.

32. The 2013 DDR and CAP was not clear on whether there are female headed households among the 4 AHs but there was a clear description on their social and economic status, as follows:

(i) There are five persons involved whose lands shall be permanently acquired for the proposed WWTP; three are female, one is a male and one is a private institution. Except for the institutional AP, the four indivsociety

(ii) The impact of land acquisition to MAP-1 is only 1.4% of their total productive lands, excluding the incomes from sales of fish harvested. Her fishpond in the WWTP site is not productive. MAP-2 is an entrepreneur whose family income is not dependent on the affected land. And, while MAP-3 is a housewife, her family is not poor because her husband is an established construction contractor in Makassar. The social status of MAP-4 can also be assumed as well-off as suggested by the upscale type of the house

33. 2013 Pekanbaru LARP states: The incomes of the affected households (AHs) are higher

handicapped members. Based on the vulnerability criteria, none of the AHs are vulnerable and none of them belong to Indigenous peoples. This information has been validated during consultation meetings with several APs and RT/RW officials conducted in July and October 2018 for LARP updating. (See Updated LARP for Pekanbaru City Dec 2018, para 4 of Executive Summary and para1115). 27 AHs names are attached in Appendix-12 Individual Compensation of AHs of Updated LARP for Pekanbaru City Dec 2018.

34. Date handed over. The City Government of Pekanbaru confirmed that an area of 13.45 hectares for the WWTP location has been completely acquired, including for the access road. In 2017, the city completed land preparation for the access road to the WWTP site. Aide Memoire Nov-Dec 2018). Para 6 of executive summary of Updated LARP of Pekanbaru states: Regarding the land for the pump station, the Head of Pekanbaru Land Agency (Kepala Dinas Pertanahan Kota Pekanbaru) sent a letter to the Head of Pekanbaru Land Office (Kepala Kantor Pertanahan Kota Pekanbaru) dated 29 October 2018 requesting measurement of land for the pump station in Bambu Kuning Sub-subdistrict, Tenayan Sub-district of Pekanbaru which belongs to Yanti,SHM No. 5052 with land area of 1800 m2 who is the sister of Edy Kuang (previously identified as the landowner of the pump station area). In this connection, Pekanbaru Land Agency conducted on Dec 7, 2018 re-measurement of the land belonging to Yanti SHM No. 5025 and it was found that there were changes in land boundaries. After the remeasurement, a meeting with the adjacent landowners was conducted and all landowners have no objection to the construction of the pump station in the land of Yanti. On 10 December 2018, after the land re-measurement and putting on the boundary mark, the original land area of 1800 m2 based on SHM was reduced to 1,688 m2 because 112m2

was used for Kampung Baru road widening and Yanti agreed with this.Pekanbaru City Dec 2018).

35. In the case of Jambi, WWTP needs 6.1 hectares affecting 4 households based on original design. Results of the Jambi sewerage DED reviews confirmed the need to acquire land for access

15 2012 LARP Pekanbaru indicated this and was validated during LARP updating

10

to the transfer pump station. The land required for the pump station (about 500 square meters) was acquired in 2014. It is located in the middle of a residential area with narrow roads, and thus access to accommodate heavy equipment during construction to the pumping station site is required. About 442 m2 land will be required for the access road. This will require a land acquisition and resettlement of one household. During the review mission, the city of Jambi confirmed that the affected household has agreed to sell their land16. During the wrap up meeting, officials from Jambi suggested that the actual land size to be acquired is 411 m2 with the total cost of Rp1.08 billion). The land price was set using appraisal from the Kantor Jasa Penilai Publik (public appraiser service office, KJPP). (Source: Revised Aide Memoire Nov-Dec 2018). The land title (SHM) for WWTP was issued by the land agency (BPN) on 12 Dec 2018 (Appendix 1) and pump station was issued on 13 Dec 2018 (Appendix 2).

Table 3. Disbursement and Use of Funds

Subproject LAR Budget Requirement

Sourceof

Funding17

AllocationStatus

FundsDisbursed

thisReporting

Period

SpecificResettlement

activitiesfunded thisReportingPeriod18

Timeliness of Fund Disbursement

CumulativeFunds

Disbursement

Delay in targets

Reasonsfor delay

for funddisbursement?

(Y/N)

Makassar No LARP, only DDR and CAP 2013

APBD - - - - - 19,085,353,000 (Compensation to AHs for WWTP land)

Pekanbaru 23,029,008,660

APBD Allocated for compensation to 27 AHs for WWTP and 1 AH for pump station

708,960,000 A total of 1,688 m2 belonging to 1 household has been acquired for the pump station following proper procedures on 10 December 2018 (IDR 708,960,000) (Source: Updated LARP for Pekanbaru City Dec 2018)

- - 17,737,794,000 (Compensation to AHs for WWTP and pump station land)

Jambi 9,890,000,000 APBD Compensation for WWTP land

- - - - 5,756,654,000 (Compensation to AHs for WWTP land)

LARP = land acquisition and resettlement Plan

36. There was no LARP prepared for Makassar. Instead, there was a Due Diligence Report and Corrective Action Plan approved by ADB in 2013 which did not cover budget for land acquisition and resettlement. The cumulative funds disbursement was based on the receipts of payment delivered to four affected households in 2011 and 2012 (Receipt of payment can be seen in the appendix of 1st semi-annual monitoring report on involuntary resettlement monitoring report (Jan-June 2018)).

37. LARP budget for Pekanbaru city can be seen in the approved June 2013 LARP. The cumulative funds disbursement was calculated from the compensation delivered to 27 affected

16 Source; 1st Semi-annual Monitoring Report on Involuntary Resettlement (Jan-June 2018), Table 6 and para 3417 E.g. Central Government, Province, Loan Funds, etc.18 E.g. Number of resettlement sites developed, number and type of community facilities constructed, number of AHs fully compensated, livelihood restoration activities implemented

11

households for WWTP land and 1 household for the pump station land. Para 59 of LARP Pekanbaru June 2013 states: As summarized in Table 6.1, the overall cost of updating and implementing the LARP was estimated at Rp 23.029 billion ($ 2.303 million) for inclusion in the Project investment. The DGHS and/or the City Government of Pekanbaru will ensure the timely provision of funds and will meet any unforeseen obligations in excess of the resettlement budget in order to meet the social safeguards objectives of the Project.

38. The cumulative funds disbursement for WWTP land of Jambi can be seen in the appendix of 1st semi-annual social safeguards and involuntary resettlement monitoring report (Jan-June 2018).

1.1. Issues Affecting Timely Land Handover

39. The inability to access 2.3 hectares of the acquired WWTP land in Makassar has hampered completion of land preparation and earthworks in Makassar. Due to a legal issue,19

earthworks at only about 2.9 hectares of the WWTP site were completed in 2016. In 2017 the city government of Makassar allocated about Rp 9 billion to complete earthworks at the remaining 2.3 hectares of (Source: Para 23-24 of Aide Memoire Nov-Dec 2018).

2. RESETTLEMENT

{The reiteration of actual impacts on houses is important because often there can be a lot of changes from what was estimated in the RP compared to actual impacts either increase or decrease. Alsothe numbers of actual physically displaced persons can affect the safeguards categorization so there is a need to be on top of this.}

Table 4. Updated Resettlement Impacts

Subproject AHs with AffectedHouses

AHs with Fully Affected Houses Partially Affected

AHs

Change in Number of AHs with Fully Affected HousesCompared to Updated RP

Total House Built on Land Eligible forCompensation

Of which Vulnerable20

Makassar NonePekanbaru NoneJambi 1 (detailed info

on this will be presented in

the next semi-annual

monitoring report after

updating the LARP for Jambi)

{It is important to confirm actual numbers of those relocating and how because information in the updated RP with respect to resettlement impacts can be subject to change. This may affect the safeguards categorization of the project.}

19 A local resident claimed a part of the WWTP site (about 2.3 hectares of the 5.2 hectares) belongs to him. This claim has been trialed at the first level court (pengadilan negeri) with the court rejected the claim and thus confirmed the ownership by the local government. However, the claimant appealed to the second level court (pengadilan tinggi), on 13 December 2017, the higher court also rejected the claim. The claimant further appealed to the supreme court, and as long as the final verdict has not been issues, the city of Makassar is not willing to complete the earthworks, to avoid further legal issues. It is unknown when the final verdict will be issues. 20 E.g. Number of female-headed with dependents; number of poor; number of IPs, etc

12

Table 5. Confirmed Resettlement Preferences for Households with Fully Affected Houses

Subproject # of AHs with Fully Affected

Houses

# of AHs Required to

Relocate

# of AHs Opting for Replacement

Land

# of AHs Opting for Self Relocation

(HHs)

# of AHs that Can Rebuild on Remaining

Land

Makassar Not applicablePekanbaru Not applicableJambi Information on one AH will be reported in the next semi-annual report

Table 6. Resettlement Solutions Implemented for Vulnerable Households

Indigenous People (HHs)

Landless (HHs)

Poor (HHs)

Female Headed

Households

Other [add as needed]

Rebuilt on remaining landRebuilt on another plot of land already ownedRebuilt (e.g. moved back) out of COI but onpublic landRebuilt on otherPurchased themselves replacement land elsewhereProvided with plot at resettlement siteProvided with replacement residential plot(non-resettlement site)Solution Pending

COI = corridor of impact

Note: This is not applicable to Makassar, Pekanbaru and Jambi as there are no vulnerable households among the APs.

Table 7. Status of Resettlement Sites

ResettlementSite*/

Subproject

Actualcompletion

date

Scheduledcompletion

date

Currentstatus(briefly

describestatus of

completion ofinfrastructure

, etc.)

No. ofplots

allocatedfor project

No. ofAHs to

beallocated

plots

No. ofplots

handedover toAHs

# AHsissued

title

# AHsrebuilthouses

# AHsliving in

relocationsite as of

reportingperiod

Makassar NAPekanbaru NAJambi Not applicable at this stage

* Include also separate residential plots to be provided to AHs even if these are not included in resettlement sites.

2.1. Other Remarks on Resettlement

[Describe issues identified along with planned and completed remedial actions. Also provide additional information regarding delays in completing resettlement sites, if any, including actions to be taken.]

3. INCOME RESTORATION PROGRAM

{Income Restoration Program approaches may vary significantly from RP to RP, and the types of questions asked and data requirements may vary considerably depending on the RP. As such, below is intended as a very general guide.}

13

3.1. Status of Income Restoration Program (for each subproject)

[Provide updated details of income restoration activities to be provided, institutional/implementation arrangements, resource requirements and schedule.]

3.2. Consultation with Eligible APs

[What consultation activities were undertaken during the reporting period to assess needs and preferences of eligible APs? Describe how women and other vulnerable APs have been included in the consultation process.]

40. Interviews with the street vendors on pump station B in Makassar was conducted on 15 Nov 2018. However, one eligible AP (Pak Yono) could not be contacted.

Table 8. Program Participation (Cumulative)

Subproject No. of eligible

APs

Participation in Livelihood Restoration Activities Disaggregated by Gender and ethnicity21 of AP [examples

provided below, revise asappropriate for specific Income Restoration Program]

Total # ofAPs

Of which vulnerable22

No. of APs in

Agricultural Extension

No. of APs in

Mechanic Course

No. of APs in Sewing Course

No. of APs in SmallBusiness Training

[other]

Makassar 123 5 0Pekanbaru 0 28 0Jambi 124 6 0

Table 9. Effectiveness of Income Restoration Program Activities

Subproject No. of eligible

APs

No. of APs employed in project-related jobs as of this monitoring period

# of APs employed in other jobs as of

this monitoring period

(post-resettlement)

Total # of employed

APs25

Of which vulnerable26

(Specify type of Project-

related job)

(Specify type of Project-

related job)

(Specify type of Project-related job)

(Specify type of job)

(Specify type of

job)

Makassar To be reported in next semi-annual reportPekanbaru Not applicableJambi To be reported in next semi-annual report

3.3. Other Remarks on Livelihood Restoration

[Please describe any issues encountered and approaches taken to resolve these.]

4. DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION & PARTICIPATION

{The idea here is for the PMU to demonstrate how the Updated Resettlement Plan (URP) has been disclosed to APs. The column headings would represent whatever is indicated in the updated RP as the means of disclosure.} 21 In projects where there are IP issues22 E.g. No. of female-headed with dependents, no. of poor; no. of IP23 For confirmation and detailed explanation in the DDR and CAP of Makassar that is under preparation24 More data will be incorporated in the next semi-annual monitoring report on IR25 From those who participated in income restoration program26 E.g. No. of female-headed households with dependents; no. of poor; no. of IP etc.

14

Table 10. Means of Disclosure of URP by Location

Subproject Translated approved URP disseminated

to Kelurahan office?(yes/no)

PIB disseminated to

AHs (date/ method*)

PIB posted in public place?

(yes/no)

Public meeting to present

approved URP(date)

Target date to complete disclosure

(date)Makassar Not applicable

because Makassar has no LARP

Pekanbaru Updated LARP for Pekanbaru has been sent to ADB, but not

yet approvedJambi LARP for Jambi is not

updated yet* Dissemination method such as handed out in public meeting, distributed house-to-house, etc.

4.1. Consultations

Table 11. Consultation/Information Dissemination Meetings Conducted During Reporting Period by Subproject

Date Venue Participants[Disaggregated

by gender]

Consultation content

Meeting Minutes withPMU

Makassar

2 July 2018 Bappeda Office and at PU Office

5 (3 female, 2 male) Participants:

- Bappeda - PISC - PU

During the meeting, some contents discussed are:

- IPAL land status ownership

- Local Government (LG) street vendors relocation plan

- ADB policy about both illegal and legal APs (affected persons) and AHs (affected households) including its compensation

Time: 10.00 11.00 WITA continued on 14.30-15.30 WITA

6 November 2018 Meeting Room Bappeda Makassar 2nd Floor


- PSPLP South Sulawesi - CPMU - PISC - Bappeda - Satpol PP (Public Order

Enforcers) - BPN/ Land Agency

Makassar - Heads of Sub-district

and urban village - Public Works Agency

Some contents discussed are:

- Overview of ADB Social Safeguards and LARP

- Table of content of LARP and data needed

- Alternative Route to WWTP

- Capacity Building on LARP and Updating LARP

Time: 9:30 14:00 WIT

28 November 2018 Makassar Bappeda Meeting Room Lt. 2


- ADB - PISC - Bappeda - Dit PPLP

Meeting discussed the progress of MSMIP Makassar:

- Update information regarding environment document of WWTP/

Time: 13.00 15.00 WITA

15


by gender]



- PPLP Strategis - CDTA - DLH/ Environment

Agency - UPTD - Spatial Planning

Agency - Satker PSPLP - Satpol PP - PU

IPAL Losari Makassar - Implementation of

Social Safeguards and planning to conduct socialization and procurement of IPAL Losari

- Criteria of readiness to support acceleration of development IPAL Losari

- EIA issue

10 December 2018 Gammara Hotel Makassar 236 (95 female,141 male) Participants:

- Head of Bappeda - PDAM - PLN - Telkom Indonesia - PT Indosat Graha

Slamet Riyadi - PT GMTD - KPPN Makassar I - Environmental Agency - Spatial planning agency - Health agency - Information and

communication services - Social agency - Legal division of

Makassar City - Satker PPLP Strategis - PPU UPTD - Urban villages, RT, RW

Bongaya, Balang Baru, -

Baeng, etc - BKM & LPM Tamalate,

Mamajang, etc - PISC

Development in Makassar/ Sosialisasi Kegiatan Pembangunan IPAL Losari Kota Makassar Some contents discussed are:

- the profile of the MSMIP Makassar along with the construction plans and methodologies which would later be implemented for both sewer and WWTP packages

- GRM - rate set by the

Regional Government to connect to this wastewater system

- Construction schedule - Community

participation in the project/ employment opportunity

Time: 08.00 am - Finish

Pekanbaru

17 July 2018 Meeting Room Bappeda Pekanbaru

4 (4 female) Participants:

- PISC - PPLPS


- Resettlement safeguards objective

- Updating LARP - Data on AHs and APs - Role of CPMU, LPMU

and PISC - LARP budget to be

updated

Time: 09.00 11.00 WIB

30 August 2018 Alamanda Meeting Room - Grand Central Hotel Pekanbaru


- Head and/or staff of urban villages and subdistricts

- PLN (state electricity

Monitoring and Evaluation of the Readiness Sewerage System MSMIP in Pekanbaru (Koordinasi Pemantauan dan Evaluasi Kesiapan Kegiatan

Time: 08.30 17.00 WIB

16


by gender]



company) - Bappeda - Satker Head of Riau

Province - Dinas Perkim (Public

housing and residential area agency)

- Environmental agency - PKPP (Housing,

Residential Area and Land Agency)

- TP4D (Security Team for Government and Regional Development)

- CPMU - PISC

Pekanbaru Sewerage System MSMIP Some contents discussed are:

- Brief explanation on MSMIP includes stakeholders in the implementation of MSMIP and WWTP options in the city government

- Domestic Wastewater Management Systems (ppt)

- GRM - WWTP technology - Law No. 23/2014, etc

During the meeting, FGD was also conducted.

25 October 2018 Meeting Room Bappeda Pekanbaru 2nd Floor


- Bappeda - Public Works Agency - PISC - Satker PLP Riau - PPLP Strategis - BPN (Land agency) - DLHK (Environment

and Forestry agency)


- The objective of the meeting - to review and update LARP.

- ADB Social safeguards Policy, the land acquisition status for WWTP and pump station and LARP Budget

- The importance of public consultation that needs to be carried out not only during preparation planning, but also before and during construction and operation & maintenance

- GRM - Entitlement matrix

Time: 10.00 17.00 WIB

7 November 2018 Gaharu Meeting Room - Furaya Hotel Pekanbaru


- Citizen of Pulau Karam, Citizen of KedungSari, Kampung Tengah, Kampung Melayu, Jadirejo, Harjosari, Sukajadi

- Head of Sub District - LPM Kedung Sari - Kabid PPL PLSP - Staff DLHK Kota

Pekanbaru - Kabid P3W Bappeda

Pekanbaru - Ka. Bappeda Kota

Pekanbaru

and Dissemination of Pekanbaru City's Domestic Wastewater Management System (Spald- Some contents discussed are:

- Brief explanation on MSMIP


- Problems in waste water management in Pekanbaru

- Outputs of the meeting: all parties got

Time: 09.00 14.00 WIB

17


by gender]



- Dinas PUPR Kota Pekanbaru/ public works and housing agency

- Bappeda Kota Pekanbaru

- PISC

clarified on information related to the project and they have expressed support to the project

8 November 2018 Gaharu Meeting Room - Furaya Hotel Pekanbaru


- Citizen of Sago, Padang Terubuk, Padang Bulan, Bambu Kuning, Pesisir, Tanah Datar, Tanjung Rhu, Kota Baru

- Head or secretary of Subidstrict

- LPM Lima Puluh, Padang Terubuk. Head/ Secretary of LPM

- DLHK - Bappeda - PUPR Pekanbaru - PISC

Advanced Coordination and Dissemination of Pekanbaru City's Domestic Wastewater Management System (Spald-T) Some contents discussed are:

- Brief explanation on MSMIP


- Outputs of the meeting: all parties got clarified on information related to the project and they have expressed support to the project

Time: 09.00 14.00 WIB

26 November 2018 Meeting Room Bappeda Pekanbaru city 2nd Floor


- Bappeda - Satker PS PLP Riau - PPLP Strategis - PISC - CDTA - ADB - Health Agency - DLHK - Land Agency - PUPR

Review Mission Asian Development Bank on MSMIP Some contents discussed are:

- Changes in technology options that will be used from CAS to FBAS

- Establishment of Wastewater UPTD

- The DED Final pipeline and WWTP will be delivered soon for the benefit of the UKL / UPL process

- Pushing for the discussion of the Draft Regional Regulation by involving the Ministry of PUPR, ADB, and CDTA

- Consideration of levies refers to PP No.2 Year 2018 related to SPM;

- Regarding institutions, LPMU and LPIU will be combined

Time: 10 .00 a.m Finish

19 December 2018 Warung near to the community house


Information dissemination regarding the project and identify the target

18


by gender]



- urban village head of Kampung Melayu

- LPM Kampung Melayu - LPM of Sukajadi

Subdistrict - Head of development of

Sukajadi Subdistrict - Community of

Kampung Melayu (5 persons-2 female)

connections households

Jambi

31 Aug 2018 Public Works Agency


- CPMU - PISC - PU Jambi - Bappeda - DLHK Jambi

Presentation of Technology Options of WWTP Jambi

-Head Public Works Agency

- MSMIP Project Monitoring Web Base

Time: 09.00 11.30 AM

19

5. OPERATION OF GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM (GRM) FOR EACH SUBPROJECT

Table 12. Summary of Grievance Cases by Level of GRM

they would like to use such a table}Location No. of

pending grievance

from previousreporting

period

No. of new grievance cases

for reporting period

Total no. of cases received

No. ofcases

resolved

No. of cases progressed to

next level

Makassar 1 0 0

Pekanbaru 0 0 0 NA NA

Jambi 0 0 0 NA NA

5.1. Narrative Summary of Grievances

[Provide a narrative summary of grievance cases by type of issue and location, for e[Where resolution of grievance resulted in any cases of land/assets compulsorily acquired, provide details along with information regarding relevant court or administrative decision and confirmation whether funds due from compensation and assistance have been placed in escrow account or provided to AP.]

41. Makassar. On March 28, 2016, a local resident claimed that 2.3 hectares of the WWTP acquired land is his and he filed a case in the court which has been trialed twice and court decided in favor of the local Government (January and December 2017). However, he appealed his case at the Supreme Court and final verdict is still pending. An alternative WWTP technology will be used to avoid the disputed area.

6. OTHER ISSUES

6.1. Resolution of Issues

[Provide information on status and/or resolution of issues raised in previous internal monitoringreport; ADB monitoring; external monitoring report, etc.]

6.2. New Issues

[Provide information on other newly identified issues impacting the implementation of RP. These may include resource constraints, changes in scope of impacts, etc.]

42. None for this period for Makassar, Pekanbaru and Jambi.

6.3. Institutional Matters and Capacity Training

[Report on the following as applicable]

43. The developments on institutional matters and training for this period for Makassar, Pekanbaru and Jambi are as follows:

20

(i) Deployment of safeguards-related staff within PMUs. Key activities conducted by PMU safeguards staff during reporting period.The head of CPMU appointed 2 of her staff in July 2019 to be the counterpart of PISC on Environment and Social Safeguards aspects

(ii) Capacity development training provided: type and number of trainings, number of staff/officers trained (disaggregated by gender).

Orientation meetings on LARP formulation/Updating were done on 25 October and 6 Nov 2018 for Pekanbaru and Makassar respectively. See attached MoMs.

(iii) Activities of community based organizations (CBOs)/mass organizations (as applicable)Not applicable

(iv) Adequacy of resources for PMU staff and consultants.

s National Environmental cum Social Safeguards Specialist resigned in the end of November 2018 and has not been replaced yet. No specific Social Safeguards Staff at City level has been hired yet.

(v) Issues in undertaking roles/responsibilities of different agencies.

Functionality of LPMU as a unit has not been fully achieved in Makassar, Pekanbaru and Jambi. It was observed that different representatives participated in the meetingsinitiated by PISC during the period particularly in Pekanbaru making it difficult to follow-up progress of activities and issues previously discussed and agreed upon.

6.4. Temporary Impacts during Civil Works

[Describe temporary impacts during implementation, including quantities of impacts, #AHs, location, types, etc. and status of restoring temporarily affected assets as appropriate and the responsible agency.]

44. Makassar. Excavation works to install sewerage pipes along some streets that are narrow will hamper entry to and from residential homes and shops/markets, parking, loading and unloading and also traffic movement. One notable place where pipe installation may hamper business if not properly addressed is the night market along Jl. Hati Murni under Package B3 contract works. The site November 2019 yielded the following information:

(i) Market SENGGOL opens daily at 15.00 in the afternoon and closes at 23.00. The street vendors start with the installation of their stalls from 13.00 15.00

(ii) There are about 350 street vendors in this night market (iii) Every night, the street vendors take home their merchandise to their homes with special

means of transportation that is managed by the market(iv) Items sold during the night market that were seen during the site inspection include the

following: shoes, clothes, cosmetics, household appliances, vegetables, fruits, cakes, fish and others.

45. The vendors interviewed during the site visit said that when construction works start, excavation/drilling works should be done as early as 05.00 until 12.00 noon so as not to hamper activities of the night market vendors. Appendix 16team at the market.

46. Pekanbaru. The sewerage pipeline construction activities will be carried out along the 109 streets and road medians. The activities will not displace households or people nor will they have any permanent adverse socioeconomic impacts on the residences, shops and other commercial establishments along the project roads. However, during the construction phase the civil work activities may cause temporary impacts on the residences, vendors and shops along the roads in

21

terms of inconvenience in access, parking, loading and unloading and also for traffic movement, particularly cars and trucks, etc. The wider roads will not face such problems as there will be sufficient right-of-way space for vehicular movement and for access to roadside businesses. However, small roads and narrow streets, particularly with clear road width of about 6.0 m and below may face some problem of traffic movement at the time of civil works. In Pekanbaru of the 103 roads/streets covered under the WCS component, only three roads: Jl. Sumber Sari, Jl. Kampar, and Jl. Tanjung - Jl. Setia Budi have clear road width of less than 6m. During the construction phase the access to houses, shops, and other commercial establishments may be temporarily affected. However, there is not likely to be any loss of incomes to the road-side commercial establishments as temporary access to road-side businesses will be provided by the contractor. All the other roads are much wider, more than 6m ROW. PISC team conducted ocular survey of 3 streets (Jl. Sumber Sari, Jl. Tanjung Datuk and Jl. Sudirman) during its visit in October 26, 2018. There are 969 different structures/buildings along the pipe alignment in these streets and 66% are commercial stores/shops while about 13% are residential buildings/houses.27 Details of the ocular survey conducted in the 3 streets are shown in the annex of the Updated LARP.

47. Jambi. Similar to Makassar and Pekanbaru, entry to and from residential and commercial establishments will be hampered along the roads where excavation works will be done during construction. However, this will not result to loss of income to the commercial establishments as temporary access can be provided by the contractor. Like in the case of Makassar, a market (Pasar Angso Duo) will be temporarily impacted during construction but no major negative impact is expected. Construction work schedules need to be consulted with the vendors prior to start of excavation works.

IV. CONCLUSION

48. Land acquisition activities in Makassar, Pekanbaru and Jambi have been completed with only one remaining for Jambi which is the site for the access road to pump station that is expected to be completed in January 2019.

49. Full Disclosure and Public Consultation activities on construction design and plans including construction impacts and mitigation measures have commenced in the sub-projects specifically for Makassar and Pekanbaru. Said activities will be started soon in Jambi now that the DED for its sewerage network has been completed. It is anticipated that more intensive consultation and disclosure will follow prior to start of civil works in Makassar and Pekanbaru.

50. Actual physical displacement or actual resettlement impacts are not anticipated in Makassar, Pekanbaru and Jambi as a result of changes in the DED.

51. Income restoration program formulation and implementation for APs/vulnerable households is not anticipated in the 3 subprojects based on review and monitoring of LARP implementation.

52. It is also anticipated that other land acquisition and resettlement activities consistent with the LARAPs including due diligence reports and corrective action reports will be concluded prior to the commencement of construction activities in the 3 sub-projects.

V. APPENDICES

Appendix 1 - Land title for WWTP Land in Jambi

Appendix 2 - Land title for Pump Station Land in Jambi

Appendix 3 - Minutes of Meeting on 2 July 2018 in Makassar

27 Source: Updated LARP Pekanbaru, October 2018

22

Appendix 4 - Minutes of Meeting on 17 July 2018 in Pekanbaru

Appendix 5 - Minutes of Meeting on 30 Augustus 2018 in Pekanbaru

Appendix 6 - Minutes of Meeting on 31 August 2018 in Jambi

Appendix 7 - Minutes of Meeting on 25 October 2018 in Pekanbaru

Appendix 8 - Minutes of Meeting on 6 November 2018 in Makassar

Appendix 9 - Minutes of Meeting on 7 November 2018 in Pekanbaru



Appendix 12 - Minutes of Meeting on 28 November 2018 in Makassar

Appendix 13 - Minutes of Meeting on 10 December 2018 in Makassar

Appendix 14 - Map showing the alternative route for Pump B Station of WWTP

Appendix 15 - Letter of Approval from Satker and PPK of Alternative Route for Pump Station B to WWTP

Appendix 16 -

Appendix 17 - LARP Implementation Report of Palembang Subproject November 2017

Appendix 18 - Post-Relocation SES Results of Palembang Subproject March 2018

Appendix 19 - Post-Relocation SES Results of Palembang Subproject September 2018

APPENDICES

Appendix 1. Land Title for WWTP Land in Jambi

Appendix 2. Land title for Pump Station Land in Jambi

Appendix 3. Minutes of Meeting on 2 July 2018 in Makassar

MINUTES OF MEETING

Ref :

Meeting Subject : Coordination meeting social safeguards and resettlement with Bappeda

and PU Makassar

Day/Date of Meeting : Monday, 02/07/2018

Time : 10.00 11.00 WITA continue on 14.30-15.30 WITA

Venue : Bappeda Office continue at PU Office

ATTENDEES:

No Nama Institution/Company Email Address Mobile Phone

1 Imbang Bappeda - -

2 Victoria Pineda PISC [email protected] -

3 Nirman Dinas PU - 0811445533

4 Elsi Zubir Dinas PU - 08114118850

5 Akbar Asri Dinas PU - 082323269977

6 Fiana Fauzia PISC [email protected] 081281026113

Ref Discussion Item Action Time Status

1 Tim PISC (Bu Vicki) started the following discussion:IPAL land status ownership that still waiting from

supreme court decision.

Local Government (LG) street vendors relocation

plan in Makassar city, especially street vendor in

front of pump station B (Mato angin stadion).

Explaining the ADB policy about all identfication and

both illegal and legal APs (affected person) and AHs

(affected house) including its compensation

income lost.

ADB concerns about all potential parties (including

affected street vendors), the compensation paid

must at least equal or more than their usual income.

PISC in this matter will ensure this policy is

performed. ADB policy will trigger the construction

phase to run smoothly. Nevertheless, we continue

this relocation process by monitoring and reporting

to ADB.

2 Respond Bappeda (Pak Imbang)Data which owned by Bappeda is not updated, so

IPAL land issue can be followed up to Dinas

Pertanahan and Dinas PU

Bappeda needs referrals for everything which will

support the whole project implementation, what is


needed, including supporting data and document?

PU, as this matter.

3 Respond PU (Pak Nirman and Ibu Elsi)IPAL land status: earthworks has not started,

moreover the land status remain the same. This case

is clear, practically and de jure/legally.

Solusion, continue to wait supreme court decision.

Also, choosing MBBR technology option that

requires smaller land area. The 2.9 area is fenced

and budget is allocated for the complete area of 5.2

ha, however we should wait for administrative

perusal to continue fencing the area

Makassar city LG plan to relocate legally street

vendors in 5 location; 1 location has been finished

last year at Karebosi Park; the other 2 will be done

by this year at Nikel and Metro street; and the last 2

is still on searching strategic location. PU can

provide supporting documents regarding this

relocation plan.

Appendix

A. Attendees

B. Selected Photo

Prepared by,Fiana Fauzia PISC MSMIP

Approved by,Brian Hayden PISC MSMIP

Asri Indiyani Head of CPMU

Appendix 4. Minutes of Meeting on 17 July 2018 in Pekanbaru

MINUTES OF MEETING

Meeting Subject : Coordination Meeting Social Safeguards and Resettlement

Day/Date of Meeting : Friday, 17/07/2018

Time : 09.00 11.00 WIB

Venue : Meeting Room Bappeda Pekanbaru

ATTENDEES:

No Name Institution/Company Email Address Mobile Phone

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 Victoria Pineda PISC [email protected]

8 R Ayu Zainur PPLPS

9 Della Permata PISC [email protected]

10 Fiana Fauzia PISC [email protected] 081281026113


1are as follow:

We want to ensure that no person who owned the

land is negatively affected because of the project

(income and livelihood)

We hope because this project their condition will be

better not worse.

PISC have not yet received data regarding these

APs and AHs.

PISC informed that on november-december

workshop will be made to monitoring progress. We

will do further discussion, outline for semi annual

report.

LPMU should be the one who is responsible (already

formally performed).

PISC mentioned about LARAP which on november

will need to be reviewed with the LPMU.

2 PISC explained about land acquisition, ownership and resettlement plan Pekanbaru that are affected, key points as follow:

Role of CPMU and Satker

Role of LPMU


Role of PISC

3 Bappeda Pekanbaru asked about how much budget that they need to prepare for LARAP update process which needs to be prepared by LPMU.

PISC answered:LARAP contains every aspects that they are asking,

Bappeda only needs to update. Including the

compasation and survey which PISC will help.

4 PISC explained about APs ASs which needs to be updated:

IPAL land owner (10/27) change their profession

from latex to palm oil industry, the rest, they open

smal convenient shop.

Pump station land has not been bought and ensure

its compensation Dinas Pertanahan said they will

bought it October

Shop buildings which are affected by the

construction plan near the 3 bridges, still need the

bridge foundation explanation through formal letter

Satker will give the formal letter by next week

PISC reminded LPMU/Bappeda/Satker: formal letter

about bridges foundation explanation, LARAP review

results, land acquisiton fro pump station, after DED

finish they will start negotiate Aps (including the

compentation)

Bappeda asked the time frame schedule to PISC

about all the deadlines above.

Prepared by,Della Permata & Fiana Fauzia

PISC MSMIP

Approved by,Brian Hayden PISC MSMIP


Appendix 5. Minutes of the Meeting on 30 Augustus 2018 in Pekanbaru

MINUTES OF MEETING

Ref :

Meeting Subject :

Coordination of Monitoring and Evaluation of the Readiness Sewerage

System MSMIP in Pekanbaru (Koordinasi Pemantauan dan Evaluasi

Kesiapan Kegiatan Pekanbaru Sewerage System MSMIP)

Day/Date of Meeting : Thursday, 30/08/2018

Time : 08.30 17.00 WIB

Venue : Alamanda Meeting Room - Grand Central Hotel Pekanbaru

ATTENDEES:


1 See attendance

sheet attached

2

3

4


1 Discussion started with the opening speech of Pak Ernest (Kabid Bappeda). He emphasized that the sanitation is an important sector in Indonesia, especially for the city of Pekanbaru. Pak Ernest also explained the Law No. 23/2014 concerning LG which stipulates that "the Wastewater Management is the OBLIGATORY for Local Government".The improved water supply and sanitation are the basic rights of the community that must be fulfilled and this is included in the Sustainable Development Goals 2020. Therefore, the Ministry of Public Works and Housing and the Pekanbaru City Government are committed to establish a domestic centralized WWTP through the MSMIP program in 2018.Regarding the MSMIP program, in the future there will be socialization related to the pipeline to the sub-district head and the lurah so that the parties concerned understand about the impact during construction, in the form of traffic disturbances, noise etc. The pipeline socialization will also be carried out with Pertagas / PGN, PDAM, PLN, and Telkom to identify the utilities of gas pipeline, water supply pipes, PLN, and Telkom.In addition, the socialization to prospective beneficiaries must also be done so that the community understands the benefits of the sewerage system and make them interested in participating in the house connection.

2 Ibu Asri (CPMU) explained:- The beginning of MSMIP activities initiated together

since 2012 consisted of 7 cities (being competed to


observe the activeness of the city government).

Pekanbaru includes the 2nd most ready LG or the 3rd

most committed LG. The loan was signed in 2014 and

the DED was discussed since 2013 up to 2014.

- Presentation related to the Domestic Wastewater

Management Systems (see PPT) all parties must

be involved so that the sustainability of this project

keeps ongoing.

- Waste water to be treated in WWTP is the Domestic

Wastewater (whether it comes from Houses, Hotels,

Restaurants, etc.).

- This has been regulated in Law 23/2014.

- The processing Waste water is not only from the toilet

(black water) but also grey water (from drain).

- Based on the latest news, Indonesia is the 2nd Winner

that has the poor sanitation

- The impact of poor sanitation indirectly causes

diarrhea, typhoid, etc.

- Target: 100% access to sanitation.

- National Agenda 100-0-100 RPJMN 2015 2019.

- Feb 2018: New Government Regulations SPAM (PP

No. 2 Year 2018) minimum service standards water

supply, housing, wastewater.

- The Minister of Public Works and Housing Regulation

(Permen PUPR) for implementation, monitoring, etc.

will be issued in 2018.

- Only 6% of safe / proper access.

- Black water and grey water will flow into the piping

system.

- As the legal basis for Domestic Wastewater

Management, there will be PERDA in Pekanbaru

which stipulate that all residents who passed by the

pipeline must be connected.

- This WWTP will be the responsibility of the city

government (as the initiator of activities) such as

environmental permits and other permits.

- This grease trap will be very important because

people usually dispose oil in the sink and this can

disrupt the processing of WWTP.

- Reference for the wastewater treatment WWTP

output is the Minister of Environment Regulation

68/2016 regarding the quality standard of waste

water.

- 1000 house connections will be funded by the

National Budget.

- In 2022, the WWTP will be able to operate if the

construction process is smooth in accordance with the

target.

- Land of WWTP technology which is now only require

2.5 hectares, in the future there will be development.


- The Design will take 2 years as maximum, maturation

will take 2 years, construction will take 4 years, O & M

can be 20 years, etc.

- The parties involved (Stakeholders) in the

implementation of MSMIP are as follows:

CPMU

Satker Strategis

Provincial Project Implementation Unit (Pak

Yenni, Pak Riza, and so on)

On City Level (LPMU Pekanbaru City

Secretary, Pak Ernest aand LPIU in Pekanbaru

City)

Lender

Auditor: BPK (Bappenas and Ministry of Finance/

Keuangan)

- WEB-based applications will be developed so that

everyone can access (one stop data) data that is

suitable for the public (updating data asking help from

local people).

3 Pak Yenni (Kasatker Riau) explained as follows:- The point is our commitment (Our Work Together).

We will not succeed if we work alone, but must be

together. The three selected cities are Pekanbaru,

Jambi, and Makassar.

- Regarding Pekanbaru sanitation access data

(wastewater, waste, drainage and drinking water) in

Pekanbaru there are still many problems. For Solid

waste, the regional landfill will be built for Pekanbaru

and Kampar. Due to if rain falls one day, there are still

many areas that inundated because the drainage

exceeds the capacity, because domestic wastewater

is still flowing into drainage (over capacity). So

actually all three are interrelated.

- In Pekanbaru, we still use ground water for daily use.

So, we build this WWTP to assist the PDAM in order

that the raw water is not too polluted. So there is a

relationship between clean water and wastewater.

- Why do we need the construction of sewerage

systems? For example, Kali Item Jakarta. The septic

tanks that we have may be many that are not

impermeable so that they leak and contaminate the

soil and ground water.

- Simple image of sewerage system (<3m open cut

and> 3m jacking / boring). The maximum depth is 11

m. There are PVC pipes and Concrete Pipes.

- Land acquisition is complete except the pump house.

This year of 2018 will be finished (using APBD funds).

- Total house connection coverage to WWTP is about

75 km.

- Pipe diameters vary from sizes of 150 - 1000 mm.


- The service areas are divided into two areas, namely

the southern area (APBN) and northern area + WWTP

(ADB Loan). The target is the contract has been

signed on the 3rd week of September.

- Diameter> 300 mm and Depth> 3m using jacking and

concrete pipe methods.

- The maximum diameter for PVC pipes is only 300 m.

- Explanation of differences in open cut and pipe

jacking.

- Explanation of WWTP options in the city government.

Initially aerated lagoon (but need a large area), now it

is Conventional Activated Sludge. The capacity of the

WWTP is 8,100 m3 / day. By using this technology,

BOD, COD, and Nutrition can be lower with the

conditions of construction and O & M going well. The

active sludge method is good for wastewater

treatment.

- Pilot Project of 1000 house connections come from

the National Budget. The remaining 10,000

connections will be funded by the APBD etc.

4 Pak Ernest (Secretary of LPMU):- For the WWTP issues, Pekanbaru City Government is

very serious due to since 2012, they did the land

provision of 13.45 hectares. The Mayor strongly

supports the national strategic program 100-0-100

(NAWACITA). Pekanbaru City is always eager to

speed up the process, but the DED has not been

provided, however today, it has been provided by the

new consultant.

- The problem is that the existing AMDAL approved in

2013, but today has expired, so it must be updated

again (due to the latest technology of WWTP).

- Today due to the 2nd option of WWTP, the area

needed is 2.5 hectares.

- The City Government strongly supports the Central

Government program. The total population of

Pekanbaru is 1.1 million at night while 1.4 million at

noon. Pekanbaru City residents are ready to assist the

smooth running of these projects and programs.

- Law No. 17 Year 2007 National Medium Term

Development Plan (RPJMN) 2005 - 2025, the

guidelines for the development of drinking water and

sanitation in order to meet the community needs.

- Activities carried out at this time are stage 1

socialization.

- The water condition in Pekanbaru City has been

polluted (Tampan area), the well water has mixed with

waste water

- There are 5 sub-districts crossed in this program,

which are sub-districts (Kecamatan) that have a fairly


dense population. Development in the dense

populated areas is quite difficult too.

- For areas that have not been served by the pipeline

network, it is possible to build a communal WWTP.

- In 2019, the wastewater target at 100% must be

achieved, but not yet met.

- In 2016, the sanitation access target at 97.26% for

Regency / City of Riau Province.

- The Domestic wastewater management system

(there are residential scales, specific areas, and urban

scales)

- 3 options for WWTP: 1. MBAS, 2. CAS, 3. FBAS. The

second option is chosen because the land is smaller,

less costs, can be developed in the future, and

wastewater can be treated to meet the wastewater

quality standards as set in the Environment Minister

Regulation No. 68 in 2016.

5 Q&A:Q&A 1: Marwan (Lurah Pekanbaru Kotabaru, Pekanbaru City):1. Collector chamber etc. not to be lower than the piping

system (note the construction of the WWTP system).

2. The best drinking water will be produced in

Pekanbaru, but please pay attention at the time of

connecting the pipes, who the officers are

responsible, how about the Grievance Redress

Mechanism? if the problems occur, where they should

complain? For example

not covered (please follow up).

Response Pak Yenni:- There are 4 stages in building this WWTP (there are

surveys, investigations, land acquisition, etc.).

- It should be clean and clear, and later the OHS (K3)

will be maintained.

- The Site Office will be constructed (this place will be

completed with the personnel who are ready to

receive complaints from you).

- To reduce the environmental impacts, so we use

technology that can minimize this.

Pak Ernest:- Regarding the hole, Bappeda was not involved. So,

we always ask who built it?

- Each party is responsible for their respective

activities.

- LG should re-send another letter to PGN / Pertagas to

cover the hole / recovery as the initial condition and

should be completed.


- In the future, there is supervision from the Public

Works Agency (Dinas PU Kota), Provincial PU, etc.

Q&A 2: Pak Junaedi, Kecamatan Lima Puluh:1. Land provided is 13.45 hectares. Is it adequate to

treat the wastewater produced by the population?

2. This system is feasible to be developed. What

makes us worry is the lack of coordination

between the planner/organizer and the

executor/implementer of the system? etc

3. What is the environmental impact? If it is

developed not in line with expectations?

4. The APBD budget for 2018 mentions 2 billion, is

the funds available?

5. Additional questions: What is the theoretical

feasibility of meeting all residents of Pekanbaru?

How many WWTP will be developed and whether

it can meet the environmental quality standards?

Response:Pak Yenni

- Not adequate. That's why there are the centralized

and local WWTP. For areas that are not densely

populated, we will develop a local WWTP or

Communal WWTP.

- All of the technology has passed through studies,

but in the future, it will change because the

technology continues to develop. In the future the

technology will become ancient, but for today the

technology is the best. And this technology can

meet the quality standard no. 68/2016.

Asri- The technology that will be used in Pekanbaru has

been used throughout the world (German,

Spanish, etc.). This is very applicable and can be

developed in the future. This technology is a

flexible technology. When it comes to

environmental impacts, even in abroad, the quality

standards are even more stringent.

Pak Yan:- This technology has been widely used in other

cities and is flexible and has been analyzed

before.

Pak Ernest:- Land acquisition in Pekanbaru.

- Standard quality of waste water must be feasible

to come out and mix with water on the earth. The

water from this WWTP will continue to be tested

to be in accordance with quality standards


(Laboratory Test) this is the reason why option

2 was chosen

- Fund problems: rather difficult, but government

has been committed (land acquisition,

procurement of pump systems, etc.) and 9 billion

already budgeted.

- 1000 house connections funded by the state

budget (APBN) and 10,000 house connections

funded by the regional budget (APBD).

Q&A 3: Dwi Rahma (Lurah Padang terubuk, Kec. Senapelan):

1. When will the work be carried out on Jl A. Yani and

Jl. Khadijah Ali which is included in the village of

Padang Terubuk?

2. Where is the location of the Pump House? Will this

pump house be developed near the residents'

houses?

3. What is the responsibility of the homeowners?

WWTP Sanimas locates at their local RW. The

experience of residents does not want to have a

pipe excavation and does not want IPAL to be in

their home location. How do you socialize it to

residents?

4. Additional questions: Can the waste become the

clean water? Is this clean water free?

Response:Pak Ernest:

- In this September, the bidding process for the

main pipes (excavation) is still ongoing.

- For total house connections, it is still 1000 house

connections).

- When .

- AMDAL studies are awaiting pipeline access

(network maps), the method of implementation

and design details have been obtained.

- Location of the pump house in the Bambu Kuning

village, close to WWTP, so the pump house is 11

meters below and then pumped to the WWTP.

This has been budgeted in 2018 for land

acquisition.

- The waste water is all sent to yellow bamboo.

Everything is processed in WWTP. SPAM is

different, it's the PDAM program. Drinking water is

actually contaminated, even though we have a

septic tank, but the septic tank is never full, so it

can be expected to leak.

- SPAM PPP (there is clean water and drinking

water)? this is different from this sanitation

program.


- Regarding wastewater, the city government is

working on PERDA to determine contributions and

has been adjusted to the ability of the community.

- In essence this activity is the initial socialization

stage to minimize the impact that will occur and in

the future there will also be socialization to the

kelurahan, RW, RT, and others. Maybe it will be

collected in the village hall.

Pak Yan:- 3rd week of September the signature of the

contract.

- Beginning of October starts physical construction

work

6 FGD:The FGD was opened with a presentation from Pak Yan (PISC) about the MSMIP project in detail, especially in the technical section of the pipeline, technical and home connection design, WWTP design, and pump house design. After the presentation, the question and answer session was opened as follows:

Q&A 4: Lurah Simpang Empat, Kec. Pekanbaru Kota:1. Who will install the connection from home to the

streets?

Q&A 5: Ibu Elmawah dari Dinas Lingkungan Hidup:1. Is there any sludge produced from this activity?

Will this mud be in the city?

2. If there is additional chlorine, it means that there

is an addition of chemicals, and will laboratory

tests be carried out? Chlorine is added to kill

bacteria isn't it?

Q&A 6: Kec. Pekanbaru Kota1. If using a gravity system means it must be tilted?

I am concerned about this because this region is

a flat area.

2. Installation of this drill system pipe, is there

material coming out? My concern is because of

the narrow road segment.

3. Input: ask for a detailed and clear SOP in the

implementation of this activity in the future. And

there must be intensive socialization to the lower

levels.

Response:Pak Yan- A home connection is installed after all pipes,

WWTPs, etc. have been completed. Those who

connect home connections are experienced

contractors. For 1,000 pilot projects, the state budget


will be financed, while 10,000 units will be funded by

the city government.

- The City Government is currently preparing a

Regional Regulation containing every house that the

MANDATORY wastewater pipeline passes through to

connect.

- The maximum depth of the pipe is 10 m. From the

base - the sloping edge is about 0.5% - 3%.

- Drilling, there is a green pipe if it is drawn which will

suck and provide water for lubrication when drilling

and then the slurry will be suctioned and will be

collected in the collection tank above.

- Beltpress Mud Abroad can be used for fertilizer

because the material is from domestic waste, so there

is no B3 and chlorine is expected to decompose.

Q&A 7: Kel. Jatirejo Kec. Sukajadi:- Inform that kel. Jatirejo is not included in the pipeline

service area for the first phase, but he informed that

right in the city center, the ditch behind the Ar-

Rahman mosque, there is human waste and if it rains,

floods can reach the city park. If possible as soon as

possible, the piping is also connected to the region.

Q&A 8: Manipol, dari Dinas Perkim:- If there is a flood, does the sludge not return to the

house?

Q&A 9: Novri, Kec. Tenayan Raya- What is the positive impact on their territory? Because

they are not served by the pipeline only the

construction of the WWTP and pump house.

Response Pak Yan- Jatirejo Subdistrict, Sukajadi Subdistrict has not been

built yet, this is still stage 1. Related to the area, it may

be made in the future. Regarding the selection of

regions that are served, please note that we are

referring to the City Sanitation Strategy (SSK) where

we capture selected sub-districts that must be

prioritized because the conditions are quite critical.

- Construction of wastewater treatment systems for

WWTP is built above flood level and has nothing to do

with drainage systems (using 100 yearly periodic flood

data)

- Positive impact: Local employment

- Negative impact: noise and odor (there is a smell but

there is a smell reduction technology) Maybe the

smell only smells for a radius of 100 - 200 m.


7 The FGD was then continued with a group discussion where the group was divided into 3 namely:1. Pekanbaru Kota District Group,

2. Combined groups of Sukajadi and Limapuluh Districts

and PDAMs,

3. OPD group.

The questions raised by each group are:What are the characteristics of your regional

community at this time?

What are the challenges (constraints and obstacles)

that may arise from the process of developing PKU

Sewerage in the area of each brother

How to overcome challenges so that the construction

of Pekanbaru Sewerage can run smoothly.

What support is expected so that the process of

developing PKU Sewerage can run smoothly in their

respective kecamatan / kelurahan

Public Campaign Mechanisms and Substances

Public Campaign Implementation Plan

Public campaign materials

Division of tasks and roles in the implementation of

public campaigns

Public campaign media that is effectively used in their

respective task areas.

RESULTS Group discussions were then posted on the wall as follows:

Attachment:

A. Attendance Sheet

B. Photos

C. Presentation Material

Bahan Tayang

Pengantar Air Limbah MSMIP Pekanbaru Asri.pptx

BAHAN

TAYANG-PEKANBARU SEWERAGE SYSTEM.pptx

DRAFT_BAHAN_PAPA

RAN_BAPPEDA_UNTK_SOSIALISASI_PKU_SEWERAGE [EDIT].ppt

Prepared by,

Yan Haryadi

Luthfi Basit

Johan Kadhafi

Della Permata

PISC MSMIP

PISC MSMIP

PISC MSMIP

PISC MSMIP

Approved by,

Seamus PISC MSMIP


Appendix 6. Minutes of Meeting on 31 August 2018 in Jambi

MINUTES OF MEETING

Ref :

Meeting Subject : 1. Discussion Option Technology for WWTP

2. MSMIP Project Monitoring Web Base

Day/Date of Meeting : Friday, 31/08/2018

Time : 09.00 11.30 AM

Venue :

ATTENDEES:


1 Asri Indiyani

2 Panggih Hidayat

3 Dinas PU Kota Jambi

4 Bappeda Kota Jambi

5 Dinas PU Propinsi Jambi

6 Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kota Jambi

7 Benny Sihaloho

8 Henry Pranajaya

Ref Discussion Item Action When Status

1Matters discussed and agreed uponPresentation of the Technology Option for WWTP

Jambi and the WEB-based Monitoring for MSMIP Project was conducted by Mrs. Asri as the Head of the CPMU MSMIP. In her presentation, there were 2 main options proposed to replace the Aerated Lagoon technology which no longer met the quality standard of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry Regulation No. 68/2016, the options were the Conventional Activated Sludge and Fixed Bed Activated Sludge

2 The parties agreed to choose the Conventional Activated Sludge with the following notes:

a. The standard of material and construction for this work includes the guarantee of spare parts availability.

b. long life and durability.

c. The effluent produced really meets the quality standards, especially the level of turbidity that can be seen directly, and unlike the experience of

Ref Discussion Item Action When Status

managing the Regional Scale WWTP, the effluent is still cloudy when disposed of in a water body.

d. Disposal of residual sludge from WWTP will be placed in the Landfill (TPA) / Septage Treatment Plant (IPLT) locations, but it should be ensured that the sludge is safe or does not contain harmful ingredients for humans.

e. There is a budget of 5 billion from the Jambi City Budget (APBD) 2019, and will be used for some

earthworks. The local government requests PISC where the location of the WWTP can be supported by the APBD. PISC said that in accordance with the last lay out, it would be directed to landfill area outside the main building.

f. Furthermore, the Head of Public Works Agency

(Ka Dinas PU) will coordinate with the Mayor to obtain the format approval in the form of a letter that will be sent to the CPMU in the near future.

3 Regarding the Web-based Monitoring of the MSMIP Project, the parties will be asked to contribute to submit progress reports and can conduct question and

answer related to the project status via the Web. PPMU, PPIU and LPMU will be given access to be able to log in on this site

A. Photos

Prepared by,

Benny Sihaloho PISC MSMIP

Approved by,

Brian Hayden PISC MSMIP


Appendix 7. Minutes of Meeting on 25 October 2018 in Pekanbaru

MINUTES OF MEETING

Ref :

Meeting Subject : 1. Coordination Meeting on Social Safeguard and Involuntary

Resettlement

2. Capacity Building on LARAP

Day/Date of Meeting : Thursday, 25/10/2018

Time : 10.00 17.00 WIB

Venue : Meeting Room Bappeda Pekanbaru 2nd Floor

ATTENDEES:


1 See attendance sheet attached

2

3

4


Coordination Meeting on Social Safeguard and Involuntary Resettlement

1 The meeting was opened by Pak Rahmad (Bappeda) which then continued by Bu Vicki (PISC) thanking Bappeda and other agencies for coming to the meeting.

Bu Vicki explained the objective of this meeting which was mainly to review the and update LARP. LARP of Pekanbaru was formulated back then in 2012, which operasionalized Safeguard Policy of ADB as outlined in SPS 2009 and SR2. LARP contains detailed description about the process of land acquisition, the compensation for WWTP and pump station area, the affected assets during construction, etc. Therefore, LARP document is a very important document.

Bu Vicki also said that ADB is very strict regarding Social Safeguards. ADB wants to protect the condition of affected persons (AP) in relation to the impacts of theproject. ADB wants the socio-economic condition of the affected persons to be the same or even improve more by the project.

2 Regarding to the Social Safeguards activity, Bapak Rahmad (Bappeda) responded that they have done land acquisition process for WWTP. He then asked Dinas PUPR to explain the current status of WWTP in which it is found that there is no decision yet on the access road to WWTP. The old access still exists, the new access is still under review and consideration.


3 Bu Vicki (PISC) presented her presentation file on the status of Social Safeguard (as of October 2018). It is mentioned that:

- The land acquisition for WWTP (27 land owners)

has been completed. The new issue is regarding

the access road.

- The inventory of temporary AH and AP need to

be conducted (survey and identification how

many AH and AP temporarily affected by

construction along the CWS network/pipe

alignment). The public consultation / socialization

also needs to be conducted, especially regarding

construction impacts and mitigation measures

- The 2nd Semi Annual Involuntary Resettlement

Monitoring Report needs to be submitted by

January 2019. LPMU shall provide the data for

this.

PISC and City government needs to conduct inventory of AP/AH along pipe alignment

4 Pak Kautsar (Bappeda) expressed about the survey and census that need to be carried out to the AP / AH. It needs to be conducted after getting the final design of the pipe alignment.

Bu Vicki then responded in addition to that, we also need to address the construction impacts and mitigation measures with the APs/AHs before start of construction for example, construction will disturb the accessibility and their business.

5 Pak Aribudi (Land Agency of Pekanbaru) responded that the land purchase for the 27 land owners has been completed, and all documents has been handed over to the PISC. However, there is no detail information on the number of trees, type of trees, etc. in which Pak Aribudi said he will give the data later tomorrow (26 Oct 2018) in his office.

He also mentioned in the past there were Pak Supriyadi (ADB consultant) that conducted socio- economic interview to the land owner, so he might probably have the data we requested. Furthermore, he also mentioned the name of Pak Suganda (ex RW) who knows the story of land acquisition process at that time.

For the pump station (1,800 m2), he stated, the city government has allocated the budget to the revision of APBD 2018 with the amount of IDR 900,000,000. The issue on this is they need to complete the measurement requirement to BPN, however, the owner of this land is not available at the moment. The certified independent appraisal team has been formed in October 2018. It is targeted to be completed in November 2018. The estimated price for this land is not known yet, it will be known after deliberation. The appraisal team has not yet submitted the official report, it could be submitted by November 2018.

Pak Aribudi will give complete compensation data of 27 WWTP land owners


Pak Aribudi is requested to send the socio-economic questionnaire to his email again. He will facilitate the interview with the pumping station land owner.

6 Pak Kautsar (Bappeda) then asked about the compensation for temporary AP/AH. How about it?

Bu Vicki (PISC) responded that there are 2 types of APs:

1. Permanently affected: by replacement cost

2. Temporarily affected: along pipe alignment

We need to address to the AP/AH, how is the mitigation in order to minimize the construction impact to their business. The impacts are divided into full impact and partial impact.

There are two types of pipe construction, open cut and pipe jacking. We need to identify which areas using open cut and which areas using pipe jacking. We need to address the technical aspect, construction impact, and mitigation of these to the AP/AHs.

7 LARP document of Pekanbaru Table 6.2 Budget shall be updated. The Bappeda cannot decide the allocated budget for LARP. They need to discuss internally among them. In regards to this budget, it is also need to know:

- how much the budget has been used?

- Who monitor this budget allocation?

- The budget for social safeguard monitoring data

also needs to be accommodated in the updated

LARP budget.

Bappeda will have internal meeting for this issue

Capacity Building on LARP and Updating LARP

8 Before the capacity building carried out, PISC refreshed

Policy.

9 Bu Budi (PISC) presented the old LARP prepared by PPTA Consultant in 2012. Bu Budi then explained one by one the definition of terms found in LARP document.

In the LARP document, there was an issue on income restoration program, one AP will lose 41% of his income (how this been solved?). Bappeda is suggested to discuss with this one AP. It is needed to know the current socio-economic condition of this AP. If the socio-economic condition of this AP is better, then there is no need to do future monitoring.

However, this is unknown yet. Pak Aribudi or Pak Suganda (ex RW) may know about this.

10 Regarding LARP, we also need to know the existence of vulnerable group in the area at WWTP & Pipe Alignment sites.

11 Regarding the name of village stated in LARP 2012, it needs to be updated into LURAH, because village is no longer used and no longer exist.

12 Bu Vicki and Budi (PISC) then explained about the importance of Public Consultation. The public


consultation needs to be carried out not only during preparation planning, but also before and during construction and operation & maintenance. The report of public consultation is also important to be documented.

Regarding the LARP monitoring document, it is still need to be monitored post project implementation semi-annually for 2 years or so until resettlement and income restoration program have been fully implemented and other project impacts have been fully mitigated.

13 In the LARP document, there is subchapter of Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM). PISC then asked about the GRM implementation in Pekanbaru so far. Has this been implemented? The GRM in the LARP is still general, it shall be specific and concrete for implementation.

In which then Bappeda explained, they will discuss among LPMU regarding this. Bappeda (as a chairman of LPMU) will follow up on the matter of:

- Determination of focal point of GRM

- The mechanism of GRM

- Who will monitor and be responsible for the GRM

- Who will record any grievance raised


14 The next chapter in the LARP document is about the legal framework, which needs to be updated based on the

Regulation.

The project commitment and policy in LARP document shall be guidelines for the institution conducting Land Acquisition.

15 The discussion then moved to Entitlement Matrix. There are few discussions in the entitlement matrix:

- Regarding illegal street vendors, based on ADB

safeguard policy, the illegal shall be

accommodated as well.

- The disturbance of business, the compensation

will be paid based on lost daily income.

- The compensation of the AP/AH not only in the

form of CASH. The compensation for illegal

street vendors shall be the same with the legal

one (no difference).

- The discussion or disclosure to the AP/AH needs

to be carried out soon, because the construction

is going to be started.

- The compensation for the AP/AH needs to be

discussed internally among LPMU


Attachment:

A. Attendance Sheet

B. Presentation Material

Presentation Social

Safeguard 25 Oct 2018.pptx

Ppt for LARP

Progress Oct 2018 - B.Indo.pptx

LARAP Pekanbaru -

B.Indo.docx

C. Photos

social safeguards and involuntary resettlement monitoring ... · in preparing any country program...

Documents