social stratification
DESCRIPTION
Black/White history in Prisons and Society - Social StratificationTRANSCRIPT
Black/White history
• Jim Crow: Late 1800s to 1960s– System of formal Black-White segregation• After ‘Reconstruction’ in the South
– Supreme Court: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)• Plessy: ‘of seven-eighths Caucasian, and one-
eighth African blood’
• Denied a seat on a first class coach in Louisiana
• Court upheld ‘separate-but-equal’
Civil Rights era
• Civil Rights era– Supreme Court: Brown v. Board of Ed (1954)• Court overturned Plessy
• Rejected ‘separated-but-equal’
• School districts can’t segregate
– Social movement mobilization– Challenge to segregation, 1950s-1960s
Civil Rights Act (1964)
• Bans employer discrimination based on:– race– sex– religion– national origin
• Allows current inequalities to persist– Past discrimination affects qualifications
1884-1914: 3,600 lynchings
Murder of James Allen and John Littlefield, Marion, Indiana, 1930
Executions for rape, 1930-1967
50
405
Not BlackBlack
Source: BJS, "Prisoners in 2004."
Men in Prison, 2004
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
18-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-54 55+
Per
100
,000
Men
White Latino Black
The Rich Get Richerand the Poor Get Prison
U.S. v. the world: Incarceration
724564
344109
191145
120118116
978881
6031
USA
Russia
South Africa
Israel
Mexico
England
Australia
China
Canada
Germany
France
Sweden
Japan
India
Rates per 100,000 population: US 2004, others most recent. Source: sentencingproject.org.
Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics Correctional Surveys.
People in prison and jail
0
250,000
500,000
750,000
1,000,000
1,250,000
1,500,000
1,750,000
2,000,000
2,250,00019
80
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
Update: prison clock
Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics Correctional Surveys.
People without freedom
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
ProbationParoleJailPrison
Chance of ever going to prison, men
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1974
1977
1980
1983
1986
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
Per
cen
t
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35Black Latino White
Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, “Prevalence of Imprisonment in the U.S. Population, 1974-2001.”
What the justice system does
• Maintain a visible ‘class’ of criminals
• Project an image– Threat of crime = threat from the poor
• A system designed to fail– Practices that lead to crime, not prevent it
• Turns the middle class against the poor– ideological function
And how it maintains crime
• Criminalizes victimless crimes– Crimes with no unwilling victim
• Arbitrary power for enforcers– Increases alienation, mistrust of the system
• Prisons are painful and demeaning– Overcomes any deterrent effect
And how it maintains crime (2)
• Failure to provide job training or jobs
• Life-long stigma– No voting rights for former felons– Registration laws and police records
• No legitimate means of success– No opportunity for ‘legitimate’ means
Update: Today’s NYT
Florida’s ex-felons in 2000
26,359
57,489
529,666
Non-votersRepublicanDemocrat
With 613,514 disenfranchised ex-felons:Assumes 14% would have voted, 69% of them for Gore.
Bush’s marginin Florida: 537 votes
If ex-felons could vote:Gore wins by 31,003
Failure to stop crime
• Recent declines– Partly the result of anti-crime policies?
• But still higher than 1960 rates– Same policies didn’t work for many years
• Other explanations– Stabilization of the drug trade– Fewer teenagers– Economic improvement
Sources: Bureau of Justice Statistics; Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
California, thousands in prison
480
050
100150200250300350400450500
81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97
Imprisonment (left)
Sources: Bureau of Justice Statistics; Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
California prison, murder rate
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 970
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Imprisonment (left)
Murder (right)
Sources: Bureau of Justice Statistics; Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
California prison, murder, jobs
050
100150200250300350400450500
81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Imprisonment (left)
Unemployment (right)
Murder (right)
Reiman’s Pyrrhic defeat theory
Pyrrhic victory: victory at such a high cost, it’s
really defeat
Pyrrhic defeatFailure to stop crime benefits the powerful so
much it amounts to success.