social stratification

20
Black/White history Jim Crow: Late 1800s to 1960s System of formal Black-White segregation After ‘Reconstruction’ in the South Supreme Court: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Plessy: ‘of seven-eighths Caucasian, and one-eighth African blood’ Denied a seat on a first class coach in Louisiana Court upheld ‘separate-but-equal’

Upload: brighteyes

Post on 12-May-2015

3.716 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Black/White history in Prisons and Society - Social Stratification

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Social Stratification

Black/White history

• Jim Crow: Late 1800s to 1960s– System of formal Black-White segregation• After ‘Reconstruction’ in the South

– Supreme Court: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)• Plessy: ‘of seven-eighths Caucasian, and one-

eighth African blood’

• Denied a seat on a first class coach in Louisiana

• Court upheld ‘separate-but-equal’

Page 2: Social Stratification

Civil Rights era

• Civil Rights era– Supreme Court: Brown v. Board of Ed (1954)• Court overturned Plessy

• Rejected ‘separated-but-equal’

• School districts can’t segregate

– Social movement mobilization– Challenge to segregation, 1950s-1960s

Page 3: Social Stratification

Civil Rights Act (1964)

• Bans employer discrimination based on:– race– sex– religion– national origin

• Allows current inequalities to persist– Past discrimination affects qualifications

Page 4: Social Stratification

1884-1914: 3,600 lynchings

Murder of James Allen and John Littlefield, Marion, Indiana, 1930

Page 5: Social Stratification

Executions for rape, 1930-1967

50

405

Not BlackBlack

Page 6: Social Stratification

Source: BJS, "Prisoners in 2004."

Men in Prison, 2004

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

18-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-54 55+

Per

100

,000

Men

White Latino Black

Page 7: Social Stratification

The Rich Get Richerand the Poor Get Prison

Page 8: Social Stratification

U.S. v. the world: Incarceration

724564

344109

191145

120118116

978881

6031

USA

Russia

South Africa

Israel

Mexico

England

Australia

China

Canada

Germany

France

Sweden

Japan

India

Rates per 100,000 population: US 2004, others most recent. Source: sentencingproject.org.

Page 9: Social Stratification

Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics Correctional Surveys.

People in prison and jail

0

250,000

500,000

750,000

1,000,000

1,250,000

1,500,000

1,750,000

2,000,000

2,250,00019

80

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

Update: prison clock

Page 10: Social Stratification

Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics Correctional Surveys.

People without freedom

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

6,000,000

7,000,000

8,000,000

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

ProbationParoleJailPrison

Page 11: Social Stratification

Chance of ever going to prison, men

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1974

1977

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

Per

cen

t

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35Black Latino White

Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, “Prevalence of Imprisonment in the U.S. Population, 1974-2001.”

Page 12: Social Stratification

What the justice system does

• Maintain a visible ‘class’ of criminals

• Project an image– Threat of crime = threat from the poor

• A system designed to fail– Practices that lead to crime, not prevent it

• Turns the middle class against the poor– ideological function

Page 13: Social Stratification

And how it maintains crime

• Criminalizes victimless crimes– Crimes with no unwilling victim

• Arbitrary power for enforcers– Increases alienation, mistrust of the system

• Prisons are painful and demeaning– Overcomes any deterrent effect

Page 14: Social Stratification

And how it maintains crime (2)

• Failure to provide job training or jobs

• Life-long stigma– No voting rights for former felons– Registration laws and police records

• No legitimate means of success– No opportunity for ‘legitimate’ means

Update: Today’s NYT

Page 15: Social Stratification

Florida’s ex-felons in 2000

26,359

57,489

529,666

Non-votersRepublicanDemocrat

With 613,514 disenfranchised ex-felons:Assumes 14% would have voted, 69% of them for Gore.

Bush’s marginin Florida: 537 votes

If ex-felons could vote:Gore wins by 31,003

Page 16: Social Stratification

Failure to stop crime

• Recent declines– Partly the result of anti-crime policies?

• But still higher than 1960 rates– Same policies didn’t work for many years

• Other explanations– Stabilization of the drug trade– Fewer teenagers– Economic improvement

Page 17: Social Stratification

Sources: Bureau of Justice Statistics; Bureau of Labor

Statistics.

California, thousands in prison

480

050

100150200250300350400450500

81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97

Imprisonment (left)

Page 18: Social Stratification

Sources: Bureau of Justice Statistics; Bureau of Labor

Statistics.

California prison, murder rate

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 970

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Imprisonment (left)

Murder (right)

Page 19: Social Stratification

Sources: Bureau of Justice Statistics; Bureau of Labor

Statistics.

California prison, murder, jobs

050

100150200250300350400450500

81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Imprisonment (left)

Unemployment (right)

Murder (right)

Page 20: Social Stratification

Reiman’s Pyrrhic defeat theory

Pyrrhic victory: victory at such a high cost, it’s

really defeat

Pyrrhic defeatFailure to stop crime benefits the powerful so

much it amounts to success.