socio project
DESCRIPTION
socioTRANSCRIPT
A Project Work In SOCIOLOGY
‘‘ Social Mobility in India ’’
SSUBMITTEDUBMITTED T TOO :
Mr. Ayan Hazra
(Faculty of Sociology)
HIDAYATULLAH NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY
Raipur, Chhattisgarh
SSUBMITTEDUBMITTED B BYY:
SACHIN
BATCH XI
ROLL NO. 114
B.A. LL.B (HB.A. LL.B (HONSONS.).)
Section ‘B’
Social Mobility in India
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Acknowledgements...................................................................................................... iii
2. Objectives..................................................................................................................... iv
3. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 5
4. Social Mobility ............................................................................................................. 6
5. Types of Social Mobility .............................................................................................. 7
6. Sanskritization ............................................................................................................. 9
7. Westernization............................................................................................................. 11
8. Modernization………………………………………………………………………. 14
9. Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 17
10. Bibliography ............................................................................................................... 18
ii | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks to the Almighty who gave me the strength to accomplish the project with sheer hard
work and honesty.
This research venture has been made possible due to the generous co-operation of various
persons. To list them all is not practicable, even to repay them in words is beyond the domain
of my lexicon.
May I observe the protocol to show my deep gratitude to the venerated Faculty-in-charge Mr. Ayan
Hazra, for his kind gesture in allotting me such a wonderful and elucidating research topic. Sir, your
sincere and honest approach have always inspired me and pulled me back on track whenever I went
astray.
I would like to thank all the members of HNLU family in general and my blooming and charismatic
friends in particular for their wholehearted co-operation throughout the odyssey.
SACHIN
iii | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
The approach of this project is descriptive. The research is based on secondary sources. Books
from the university’s library have been used. Articles and reports from different websites have
been used in order to get comprehensive data on the subject.
SOURCES OF DATA:
The secondary sources of data have been used in the project. The secondary sources, which
are used in the project, are the following –
1. Books
2. Journals
3. Websites
iv | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
Introduction
Individuals are recognized in society through the statuses they occupy and the roles they
enact. The society as well as individuals is dynamic. Men are normally engaged in endless
endeavor to enhance their statuses in society, move from lower position to higher position,
secure superior job from an inferior one. For various reasons people of the higher status and
position may be forced to come down to a lower status and position. Thus people in society
continue to move up and down the status scale. This movement is called social mobility.
Social mobility is an inseparable aspect of the modern society. It does not mean that all
societies provide equal opportunities for mobility. The tempo of social mobility is also not
the same everywhere. Some societies are called to be more mobile than others. The Indian
society is also experiencing comparatively a high rate of social mobility now.
A belief that Indian society which is having caste as a dominant form of social stratification
system, is relatively rigid and does not favor mobility. Such unfounded views are not relevant
now. Social mobility seems to be very intense in India especially at the beginning of the 21 st
century.1
Prof. M.N. Srinivas, an eminent Indian Sociologist, have convincingly established the fact
that social mobility is taking place both within and outside the framework of caste. Prof.
Srinivas introduced new sociological terms such as, Sanskritization and Westernization in
support of his views.the two terms have assumed importance in the analysis of the socio-
cultural mobility in the Indian Society.
India is becoming more and more westernized. It means it is becoming modernized.
Modernization is taking place with such a speed that it has radically transformed our social,
political, educational, economic, religious and other organizations.
1 http://www.sociologyguide.com/social-mobility/index.php
5 | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
Social Mobility
People move from a lower position to a higher position to secure a good status and for many
reasons men are even forced to come down a lower status. The movement of people in the
society, that is, change in their statuses, is called the social mobility.
According to Wallace and Wallace social mobility is the movement of a person or persons
from one social status to another.
W.P Scott has defined social mobility as the movement of an individual or group from one
social class or social stratum to another.
Social mobility may be understood as the movement of an individual or group from one
social status or position to that of another. Example, the poor people may become rich, the
bank peons may become bank officers; farmers may become ministers; a petty businessman
may become a bankrupt and the ruling class may be turned out of the office, and so on.2
Types of Social Mobility –
2 Ram Ahuja, Indian Social Sysytem, Rawat Publications, New Delhi, 1993
6 | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
Horizontal and Vertical Social Mobility
A distinction is made between horizontal and vertical social mobility. The former refers to
change of occupational position or role of an individual or a group without involving any
change in its position in the social hierarchy, the latter refers essentially to changes in the
position of an individual or a group along the social hierarchy. When a rural laborer comes to
the city and becomes an industrial worker or a manager takes a position in another company
there are no significant changes in their position in the hierarchy. Those are the examples of
horizontal mobility. Horizontal mobility is a change in position without the change in statue.
It indicates a change in position within the range of the same status.
It is a movement from one status to its equalivalent. But if an industrial worker becomes a
businessman or lawyer he has radically changed his position in the stratification system. This
is an example of vertical mobility. Vertical mobility refers to a movement of an individual or
people or groups from one status to another. It involves change within the lifetime of an
individual to a higher or lower status than the person had to begin with.
Forms of Vertical Social Mobility
The vertical mobility can take place in two ways - individuals and groups may improve their
position in the hierarchy by moving upwards or their position might worsen and they may fall
down the hierarchy. When individuals get into seats of political position; acquire money and
exert influence over others because of their new status they are said to have achieved
individual mobility. Like individuals even groups also attain high social mobility. When a
dalit from a village becomes an important official it is a case of upward mobility. On the
other hand an aristocrat or a member of an upper class may be dispossessed of his wealth and
he is forced to enter a manual occupation. This is an example of downward mobility.
Inter-Generational Social Mobility
Time factor is an important element in social mobility. On the basis of the time factor
involved in social mobility there is another type of inter-generational mobility. It is a change
in status from that which a child began within the parents, household to that of the child upon
reaching adulthood. It refers to a change in the status of family members from one generation
to the next. For example a farmer's son becoming an officer. It is important because the
amount of this mobility in a society tells us to what extent inequalities are passed on from one
generation to the next. If there is very little inter-generational mobility .inequality is clearly
deeply built into the society for people' life chances are being determined at the moment of
7 | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
birth. When there is a mobility people are clearly able to achieve new statuses through their
own efforts, regardless of the circumstances of their birth.
Intra-Generational Mobility
Mobility taking place in personal terms within the lifespan of the same person is called intra-
generational mobility. It refers to the advancement in one's social level during the course of
one's lifetime. It may also be understood as a change in social status which occurs within a
person's adult career. For example a person working as a supervisor in a factory becoming its
assistant manager after getting promotion.
Structural mobility
Structural mobility is a kind of vertical mobility. Structural mobility refers to mobility which
is brought about by changes in stratification hierarchy itself. It is a vertical movement of a
specific group, class or occupation relative to others in the stratification system. It is a type of
forced mobility for it takes place because of the structural changes and not because of
individual attempts. For example historical circumstances or labor market changes may lead
to the rise of decline of an occupational group within the social hierarchy. An influx of
immigrants may also alter class alignments -especially if the new arrivals are
disproportionately highly skilled or unskilled.3
Sanskritization
3 http://www.sociologyguide.com/social-mobility/types-of-mobility.php
8 | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
The term sanskritisation was coined and used by M. N. Snnivas to describe the process of
cultural mobility in the traditional social structure of Indian society. In his study among the
Coorgs of erstwhile State of Mysore, he found that lower castes, in order to raise their
position in the caste hierarchy, adopted some Brahmanic customs and gave up some of their
own considered to be impure by the higher castes. For instance, they gave up meat-eating,
consumption of liquor, offering of animal sacrifice to their deities; they imitated the
Brahmans in matters of dress, food and rituals. By doing this within a generation or so they
could claim higher positions in the social order.
In other words, they thought the higher castes should accept them as their equals and would
treat them with honour and dignity. To denote this process of social mobility Srinivas had
first used the term 'Brahmanisation'. But indeed, he found it difficult to keep in circulation the
concept of Brahmanisation in sociological and social anthropological paralance. Therefore,
subsequently he replaced it by more appropriate term, namely Sanskritisation.
M. N. Srinivas defines sanskritisation," as a process by which a low Hindu caste, or tribal, or
other group changes its customs, ritual, ideology and the way of life in the direction of a high,
frequently, 'twice-born' castes".
Srinivas says Sanskritisation is the process of cultural and social mobility which is disallowed
in the traditional Hindu social order. Sanskritisation is an endogenous and localised version
of social change. Yogendra Singh says that Sanskritisation is a culturally specific case of the
universal motivation toward 'anticipatory socialisation' of the culture of the higher group in
the hope of gaining its status in future. Sanskritisation is a unique historical explanation of the
general process of acculturation as a means for vertical social mobility.4
According to Yogendra Singh, sociologist, there are two levels of meaning which are implicit
in Sanskritisation and which have been made use of by M. N. Srinivas interchangeably.
These are 'historical specific' and 'contextual specific'. In historical specific sense,
Sanskritisation refers to those processes in Indian history which led to changes in various
castes. It is indicative an indigenous source of social change in the broad historical spectrum
of India. In contextual specific sense, Sanskritisation denotes contemporaneous processes of
cultural imitation of upper castes by lower castes or sub-castes in different parts of India.
Sanskritisation involves positional change in the caste system without producing any
structural change. sanskritisation is an extremely complex and heterogeneous concept.
4 C.N. Shankar Rao, Indian Society, S. Chnad, New Delhi, p. 238
9 | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
Process of Sanskritization –
A process of imitation – Sanskritization denotes a process in which the lower castes
try to imitate the life-style of the upper castes in their attempt to raise their social
status.
Areas of imitation – the lower started imitating some of the aspects of the upper
caste such as, marriage, treatment of women, rituals, food habits and dress habits,
system of giving manes to the newly born ones, imitation of ideologies and values.
Process of upward mobility – in the process of Sanskritization, a caste is trying to
raise its position in the caste hierarchy not at once, but over a period of time. It takes
sometimes, a period of one or two generations.
Pre-conditions of Sanskritization – the imitated caste is normally regarded as
superior to the imitating caste in ritual status, economic matter and social prestige.
Castes taking part in the process of Sanskritization must have the will to increase its
social status at least by imitating the upper caste.
It does not take place in all the places at the same time – In most of the cases the
lower caste tend to imitate the upper castes particularly the Kshtriyas and Brahmin
castes. But there are instances of upper castes imitating some of the practices of the
lower castes and tribal groups. So, Sanskritization is not a one-way process, it is a
two-way process.
It indicates only positional changes – mobility, that is involved in the process of
Sanskritization results only in “positional changes” for particular castes and need not
necessarily lead to a “structural change”. It means while individual castes move up
and down, the structure as such remains the same.
It does not automatically results into achievement of a higher status – people will
have to wait for a period of a generation or two before their claim can be accepted. It
may so happen that their claim may not be accepted in particular area or period of
time.
Westernization
10 | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
M. N. Srinivas defines westernisation as, "the changes brought about in the Indian society
and culture as a result of our hundred fifty years of British rule, the term subsuming changes
occurring at different levels-technology, institutions, ideologies and values."
Emphasis on humanitarianism and rationalism is a part of westernisation which lead to a
series of institutional and social reforms in India. Establishment of scientific, technological
and educational institutions, rise of nationalism, new political culture and leadership in the
country are all biproducts of westernisation, According to Srinivas, the increase in
westernization does not retard the process of sanskritisation; both go on simultaneously and
to some extent, increase in westernisation accelerates the process of sanskritisation. For
instance, postal facilities, railways, buses and newspaper media which are tools of western
impact on India render more organised religious pilgrimages, meetings, caste solidarities etc.
are possible now than in the past. By westernisation he means primarily the British impact.
Westernisation in India commenced with the advent of British people whose culture was
different. On 1599 an English Company was formed under the name 'Merchant Adventurers',
popularly known as the East India Company, to undertake trade and commerce. The culture
of the English was totally different from that of the indigenous people of India. Queen
Elizabeth granted a royal charter to the British Company to trade in the east, including India
in December 31,1600. The East India Company established factories at Surat, Broach,
Ahmedabad, Agra and Masulipatnam between 1600 A.D. and 1714 A.D. The Company
opened its first factory in Orissa in 1633.
The East India Company gradually attempted to acquire political power and on 23rd June,
1757 the Company army defeated the army of Siraj-ud-Daulah at Plassey. The British rule
commenced in India systematically from this time onwards.
The Charter Act of 1813 was renewed in 1833 and Lord Bentick was appointed as the
Governor of Bengal. Lord Bentick appointed Lord Macaulay in 1834 as Law Member in the
Governor's Council. Mecaulay was entirely responsible to design the system of education for
Indians in India. On the basis of recommendations of Lord Macaulay primary schools were
established in British pattern with some modifications to prepare Indians to assist the British
in their administration. British system of liberal education which was introduced in India to
establishment of 3 Universities in the 3 Presidencies, namely, Kolkata, Mumbai, and
Chennai. Western liberal education gradually brought about changes in technology, social
institutions, ideology and values. Western liberal education introduced in India
humanitarianism and rationalism and was responsible for the development of a lessez faire
attitude among the educants.
11 | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
The British system of education created an awareness of exploitation in the minds of
educated ones and was instrumental in generating a rational attitude in their minds.
Establishment of scientific, technological, vocational and educational institutions led to the
rise of nationalism. A new political culture, indigenous leadership, and trade union movement
were the bi-products of westernisation. Professional, administrative and general bureaucracy
emerged under the impact of British rule.
Foundation of a new jural system in India was laid down by Warren Hastings. The process of
westernisation accelerated the process of sanskritisation which became the corner stone of
freedom movement later on. Westernisation mainly implies changes in the dress pattern,
dietary pattern or eating, etiquette, household articles and social encounters. When western
liberal education was introduced the Brahman and other high caste Hindus first seized with
the opportunities of receiving higher education. They developed some sort of secular
education so as to shun orthodoxy and conservatism. The school atmosphere was secular and
free from religious influences. Westernisation wiped out superstitions, inhibitions and ritual
taboos.
Westernisation paved the way for bringing about social reforms, such as removal of
untouchability, prevention of Sati and Child marriage. It farther emphasised widow
remarriage and opened vistas for women to take up public assignments. It also removed
intercaste commensal barriers and encouraged intercaste marriages.5
Westernisation was responsible for the rise of nationalism and launching of freedom
movement. It also introduced newspaper media which became a vital force in mobilising
public opinion against the British rule. Westernisation created scope for greater spatial
mobility and societal contact. People took to pilgrimages which in course of time helped
them to form larger political organisations and institutions. Travel also promoted caste
solidarity and regional and sub-regional solidarities. Such solidarities helped the Indians to
organise protest meetings against the British in order to voice their grievances.
Westernisation was responsible to bring women from seclusion to agitational fora which later
on reinforced the movement against the British rule.
The Western culture and tradition which at that time had undergone fundamental
transformation through industrial revolution created a liberal attitude in the minds of educated
Indians. The British society had shaken oppression of the church and feudalism and this value
was acquired by the Indians who opposed colonial imperialism and oppression. As the British
themselves were trying to promote rational individualism in their economy and society so
5 C.N. Shankar Rao, Indian Society, S. Chnad, New Delhi, p. 247
12 | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
also Indians tied to do the same thing against the British rule. In course of the British rule,
westernisation process forged unity among the discrete individual castes so as to counter the
British administration.
In course of time, westernisation helped Indians to launch resistance and freedom movements
against the British. But British could finally pack off from India from 15th August 1947
handing over the reigns of power to the Indians. Had westernisation not been there how much
time the departure of British rule had taken could not be easily estimated.
The influence of westernization on India society include;
Influence on caste system.
Disintegration of Joint family.
Number of social reform movements.
Disintegration of cottage industries.
Variety in cultivation.
New measures in land management.
Democratic values and ideas were promoted.
Social justice and uniform administrative system developed.
Modernization –
Modernization is understood as a process which indicates the adoption of the modern ways of
life and values. The term was used previously to refer only “to change in economy and its
13 | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
related effect on social values and practices”. As a result of the change in the economy, the
society itself underwent changes in its values, beliefs and norms. Today, the term,
“Modernization” is understood as an attempt to, on the part of the people, particularly those
who are custom-bound, to adopt themselves to the present time, conditions, styles and ways
in general.
According to Daniel Lerner, who introduced the concept of Modernization, “Modernization
is the current term of an old process of social change whereby less developed societies
acquire the characteristics common to more developed societies”.
According to Semlser, Modernization refers to “a complex set of changes that take place
almost in every part of the society as it attempts to be industrialized. Modernization involves
ongoing change in a society’s economy, politics, education, traditions and religion.”6
Characteristics of Modernization –
The process of modernization has different dimensions. The spirit of modernization is
expressed in different areas such as – social organization, culture, political field, economy,
education, etc. in different ways. The process of Modernization reveals the following
important characteristics –
Modernization includes – “a temple of science, reason and rationalism, secularism, high
aspiration and achievement orientation, overall transformation of attitudes norms and
values, creation of new functional institutions, investment in human resources, a growth
oriented economy, a national interest rather than kin, caste, religion or language oriented
interests, an open society, and a mobile process.”7
According to B. Kuppuswamy, “the main feature of Modernization is the building up of an
“open society” in which individuals of talent, enterprise and training can find places in the
society appropriate to their achievement. The process of Modernization involves an increase
in social unrest till the social system is responsive to the new aspiration built up by the
Modernization process.”
Measures of Modernization –
Rustow and Ward [1964] have mentioned of some measures of modernization. They include
such specific aspects of changes as :
6 C.N. Shankar Rao, Indian Society, S. Chnad, New Delhi, p. 2517 Ram Ahuja, Indian Social Sysytem, Rawat Publications, New Delhi, 1993
14 | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
Industrialisation of economy and adopting a scientific technology in industry,
agriculture, dairy farming, etc., to make them highly productive;
Secularism of ideas – that is, a diffusion of secular – rational norms on culture;
A remarkable increase in geographic and social mobility which includes occupational
mobility also;
A spread of scientific and technical education;
A transition from ascribed to achieved status;
An increase in material standard of living;
High expectancy of life at birth;
Relatively greater measures of public participation in the policy – or at least
democratic representation in defining and choosing policy alternatives.
Daniel Lerner observes : “According to this typology, the modern person is an urban
literate who participates fully in the public forum, market place, political arena.”
Causes of Modernization –
Modernization is not caused by any single factor. It is the result of a number of factors –
Education – Education, that too education pertaining to the fields of science and
technology provides the basis of modernization. Education involves a sense of loyalty
and creates skills and attitudes essential for technological innovations.
Mass Communication – the process of modernization hinges on the phenomenon of
mass communication. The development of mass communication [including T.V.,
newspaper, radio, computer, internet etc.] is an important means of spreading modern
ideas at a faster rate. The mass media is the device that can spread the requisite
knowledge and attitudes quickly and widely.
Ideology based on Nationalism – Nationalism and democracy are very much linked
with modernisation. Nationalism is connected with national awareness and political
consensus. Mass media plays a very vital role in democratic societies to spread
modern views, ideas, values etc. by persuading the masses.
Charismatic Leadership – A charismatic leader is in a better position to impress
upon the people to adopt modern beliefs, values, practices and behaviour patterns. But
the danger involves here is that this popular leader may take the undue advantage of
15 | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
his position and use modern values, ideas, etc., for his personal glorification rather
than for the national development.
Other Factors – there are two more factors which cause the modernization –
o Urbanization and Industrialisation – urbanization and industrialization are
two inter-related processes that are assumed to be invariably linked up with
modernization. Urbanisation refers to the process of growth and expansion of
cities. Industrialisation refers to the unprecedented growth and expansion of
the industries.
o Universal Legal System – the “rule of law” is one of the prerequisites of the
modernization. The present legal system places premium on the individual
protecting his rights and assuring his freedom.8
Problems of Modernization –
Prof. Ram Ahuja speaks of following problems of modernization –
Modernization demands that society must change in all ways at once. But such a
regular and co-ordinated pattern of growth cannot be planned and materialised.
During the period of modernization, structural changes mostly uneven. Example,
Industries may be modernized but religious system, family system, etc. remain
conservative.
Modernization of social and economic institutions may create conflicts with the
traditional ways of the life. Example, Trained M.B.B.S. doctors may pose a threat to
the traditional medical practitioners.
Most often roles adopted by the people are modern, but their values continue to be
traditional.
There is lack of cooperation among agencies which modernise and among those
institutions and systems which are already modernized.
Conclusion
8 C.N. Shankar Rao, Indian Society, S. Chnad, New Delhi, P. 253
16 | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
Sanskritisation and westernisation as concepts are primarily focussed to analyse cultural
changes. Describe the social changes occurring in modern India in terms of sanskritisation
and westernisation is to describe it primarily in cultural and not in structural terms. The
analysis in terms of structure is much more difficult than an analysis in terms of culture.
Westernization improved communication and technology; it hastened the process of
Sanskritization through religious propaganda and caste and communal congregation. Higher
castes gave up traditional customs and adopted the life style of the westerns. Lower castes
aspiring for higher status filled the higher caste vacuum through Sanskritization.
It was observed that the higher caste perhaps to maintain the social distance between them
and the lower castes they have adopted the life style of westerns. By the time the lower caste
reached their destiny through Sanskritization, the upper castes have vacated that place
through westernization.
Though modernization raises the aspiration of the people, the social system does not provide
enough chances to materialize them. This creates frustration, disappointment and social
unrest.
The concept of Sanskritization and Westernization help us only to analyze the superficial
change processes which took place in the later half of the 19th century and the first two
decades of the 20th century. Neither Sanskritization nor Westernization affects the social
structure. So they are entirely inadequate to help us to analyse the change processes which are
currently taking place in the Indian society. Though the terms Sanskritization and
Westernization are not entirely useless, but the term Modernization is more appropriate and
relevant one in providing a satisfactory explanation of social change.
REFERENCES
17 | P a g e
Social Mobility in India
BOOKS
Ram Ahuja, Indian Social Sysytem, Rawat Publications, New Delhi, 1993.
C.N. Shankar Rao, Indian Society, S. Chnad, New Delhi
WEBLIOGRAPHY
www.publishyourarticles.net
www.sociologyguide.com/social-mobility
18 | P a g e