soil tillage impacts on nutritional status of wheat

17
SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT STATUS OF WHEAT Faculty of Agriculture, University J.J. Strossmayer in Osijek. Trg Sv. Trojstva 3, HR- 31000 Osijek, Croatia. [email protected] . Danijel JUG, Irena JUG, Vlado KOVACEVIC, Bojan STIPESEVIC, Jasna SOSTARIC

Upload: swain

Post on 15-Jan-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Faculty of Agriculture , University J.J. Strossmayer in Osijek. Trg Sv. Trojstva 3 , HR-31000 Osijek , Croatia. [email protected]. SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT. Danijel JUG, Irena JUG, Vlado KOVACEVIC, Bojan STIPESEVIC, Jasna SOSTARIC. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONALSOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL

STATUS OF WHEAT STATUS OF WHEAT

Faculty of Agriculture, University J.J. Strossmayer in Osijek. Trg Sv. Trojstva

3, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia. [email protected].

Danijel JUG, Irena JUG, Vlado KOVACEVIC, Bojan STIPESEVIC, Jasna SOSTARIC

Page 2: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

Introduction

Object of this study was testing nutritional status of winter wheat under different soil tillage with aim of possible new recommendation for fertilization under reduction/absence of soil tillage.

Page 3: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

Material and methods

The Field experiment

cultivar :: w. wheat DEMETRA (in rotation with soybean)

location :: eastern Croatia – experimental site near Kneževo

experimental period :: 2002-2005

soil tillage treatments :: CT – conventional tillage

DH – diskharrowing

NT – no-tillage

Basic experimental plot :: 900 m-2

fertilization :: N:P2O5:K2O = 121:130:130 kg ha-1

Page 4: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

Conventional tillage - in autumnConventional tillage - in autumn

Page 5: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

Diskharrowing - in autumnDiskharrowing - in autumn

Page 6: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

No-tillage – early seasonNo-tillage – early season

Page 7: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

Sampling and chemical analysis

sampling w. wheat :: Feekes 10.5

(Emergence of inflorescence completed) samples :: microwave digestion

(65% HNO3 + 30% H2O2)

analyses :: 23 elements with a Jobin-Yvon Ultrace 238 ICP-OES spectrometer

(laboratory of the RISSAC. Budapest. Hungary)

sowing :: in October

John Deere 750A

interrow spacing 16.5 cm

planned density 700 plants m-2

deep of sowing 2-3 cm

plant protection :: uniformly for each tillage treatments

Page 8: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

Soil characteristics

calcareous chernozem on loess substrate

chemical properties ::

pH (H2O) - 8.1

pH (KCl) - 7.5

Humus - 2.6%

CaCO3 - 2.1%

P2O5 - 18.7 mg 100 g-1 tla (AL-soluble)

K2O - 28.4 mg 100 g-1 tla (AL-soluble)

Page 9: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

Mean air temperature and precipitation on experimental field (N::4582, E::1864)

Year Precipitation (mm) Air temperature (oC)

2002 620 12.4

2003 494 11.5

2004 823 11.1

2005 855 10.6

1965-2005 636 11.0

Weather characteristic

Page 10: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

-75

-50

-25

0

25

50

%

year

Precipitation in the periodOctober-July

after LTM -22 -54 23 30

2002 2003 2004 2005

Page 11: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

ResultsResults

Page 12: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

The impact of the Year (factor A*) on nutrient composition of winter wheat (cultivar Demetra)

Year (A)*

The aerial part of wheat in stage of inflorescence emergence

mg kg-1 on dry matter basis

P K Ca Mg S Zn Mn Fe Cu B

2002200320042005

2601220423772162

138729516

1157110848

2020206118501662

1389160811331098

13711405 970 948

9.813.7 9.1 9.6

66.659.758.758.6

105.8126.5 81.2100.9

4.718.387.508.08

2.393.903.073.12

LSD A 5%LSD A 1%

n.s.n.s.

12491893

207n.s.

148225

160243

1.82.7

n.s.n.s.

24.9n.s.

1.151.75

0.92n.s.

Year (A)*mg kg-1 on dry matter basis

Mo Co Ni Cr Sr Ba Al Pb Cd Na

2002200320042005

0.3550.1620.5700.665

0.1530.4670.3380.355

0.4410.5230.2270.382

1.320.310.220.27

4.925.223.963.32

15.713.811.412.0

131239202286

0.4360.5080.6160.600

0.0860.0640.0480.050

36.634.630.822.9

LSD A 5%LSD A 1%

0.0950.144

0.1080.163

0.192n.s.

0.71n.s.

1.10n.s.

n.s. n.s.

4974

n.s. n.s.

0.0090.014

n.s. n.s.

Impact of the year on nutritional status of winter wheat

Page 13: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

Soil tillage (ST) :: conventional - CT; diskharrowing - DH; no-till - NT and composition of winter eheat (cultivar Demetra)**

ST

The aerial part of wheat in stage of inflorescence emergence

mg kg-1 on dry matter basis

P K Ca Mg S Zn Mn Mo Cu B

CTDHNT

228123712356

11062

11776

11517

186619001928

128113191321

114312141163

10.510.710.5

58.760.263.8

0.4580.4680.388

6.967.297.25

3.083.183.10

LSD 5% n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s.

Mean 23361145

21898 1307 1174 10.6 60.9 0.438 7.17 3.12

Influences of the soil tillage on nutritional status of winter wheatin four year average

Referral values of some nutrients in wheat (Bergman, 1992)

0.25-0.50

3.30-4.50

0.35-1.00

0.10-0.23

20-70

30-100

0.10-0.30

5-10

5-10

Page 14: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

Soil tillage (ST) :: conventional - CT; diskharrowing - DH; no-till - NT and composition of winter eheat (cultivar Demetra)**

ST

The aerial part of wheat in stage of inflorescence emergence

mg kg-1 on dry matter basis

Fe Co Ni Cr Sr Ba Al Pb Cd Na

CTDHNT

11110496

0.3220.3680.295

0.4100.3630.406

0.550.500.54

4.274.394.41

13.013.113.6

204226214

0.5020.5740.544

0.0690.0610.057

32.930.330.5

LSD 5% n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. 0.008 n.s.

Mean 104 0.328 0.393 0.53 4.36 13.2 214 0.540 0.062 31.2

under detectable levels (mg kg-1): Se (<0.60). Hg (<0.12). As (<0.40)

Page 15: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

5.62 5.59

5.40

5,00

5,20

5,40

5,60

5,80

t ha- 1

2002- 2005 year

W. wheat yields (t ha- 1)

CT

DH

NT

Page 16: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

Conclusion reduction or absence of soil tillage under

conditions of calcareous chernozem of Barannya province did not seriously affect nutritional status of winter wheat

usual fertilization practice can be recommended for possible use of non-conventional soil tillage practice

Page 17: SOIL TILLAGE IMPACTS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF WHEAT

Thank you for your

attention