solomon islands climate change and disaster risk finance...

PACIFIC ISLANDSFORUM SECRETARIAT

AustralianAid U N

D P

Supported by:

Solomon Islands Climate Change and

Disaster Risk Finance Assessment

Executive Summary September 2017

Prepared by the Pacific Community, the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat, the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH

and the United Nations Development Programme



Executive SummarySeptember 2017



Suva, Fiji, 2017Published by the Pacific Community

Solomon Islands Climate Change and Disaster Risk Finance Assessment – Executive Summary

© Pacific Community (SPC), Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat (PIFS), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, and United Nations Development Programme

(UNDP) 2017.

SPC, PIFS, GIZ and UNDP authorise the reproduction or translation of this material for scientific, educational or research purposes, provided that the source document is properly acknowledged.

Permission to reproduce the document and/or translate in whole, in any form, whether for commercial/for profit or non-profit purposes, must be requested in writing.

Original text: English

Pacific Community Cataloguing-in-publication data

Solomon Islands Climate Change and Disaster Risk Finance Assessment: executive summary - September 2017 / prepared by the Pacific Community, the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat, the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH and the United Nations Development Programme

1. Risk management — Solomon Islands.2. Disasters — Solomon Islands.3. Environment — Solomon Islands.4. Climatic changes — Solomon Islands.5. Climatic changes — Management — Solomon Islands.6. Climatic changes — Environmental aspects — Solomon Islands.7. Environment — Management — Solomon Islands.

I. Title II. Pacific Community III. Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat IV. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit V. United Nations

577.22099593 AACR2

ISBN: 978-982-00-1079-6

Acknowledgment

The development of this Climate Change and Disaster Risk Finance Assessment Report was coordinated by the Ministry of Environment, Climate Change, Disaster Management and Meteorology (MECDM), on behalf of the Solomon Islands Government. It was jointly drafted by the Pacific Community (SPC), Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat (PIFS), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Support was also provided by the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) and the Pacific Financial Technical Assistance Center (PFTAC).

The assessment and development of this report received funding from the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

Photos: SPC, PIFS, GIZ

Prepared for publication at SPC’s Suva Regional Office, Private Mail Bag, Suva, Fiji, 2017Printed by Quality Print Limited, Suva, Fiji, 2017

www.spc.int

Solomon Islands Climate Change and Disaster Risk Finance Assessment – Executive Summary 1

Executive Summary

Climate change and disaster risk management are issues of high priority to the Solomon Islands Government, given the current and future impacts expected, and the associated risks posed to natural ecosystems such as coastal and marine environments, fisheries, agriculture, water resources, health, biodiversity, infrastructure and industry. Solomon Islands, as a Small Island Developing State (SIDS) and Least Developed Country (LDC), requires up-scaled and targeted financial resources to be able to effectively respond to the adverse effects of climate change and disasters. In recognition of this, the Solomon Islands Government requested for this Climate Change and Disaster Risk Finance Assessment to be undertaken, in order to complement current efforts that are being progressed at the national level. The assessment, and this resulting report, will assist the Solomon Islands Government and its partners in clarifying the national climate change and disaster risk finance landscape; who the key partners are; how to better manage and up-scale climate change and disaster risk finance; take stock of, update and strengthen current policies and plans, institutions, and public financial management systems; and to make informed decisions for budget planning prioritisation and effective coordination.

The Solomon Islands Climate Change and Disaster Risk Finance Assessment was guided by the Pacific Climate Change Finance Assessment Framework (PCCFAF), which reviewed the climate change and disaster risk finance program of Solomon Islands against seven key pillars: (i) policies and plans, (ii) funding sources, (iii) public financial management and expenditure, (iv) institutions, (v) human capacity, (vi) gender and social inclusion, and (vii) development effectiveness. This report comes at an opportune time, as new climate financing mechanisms are operationalised and the international community works towards the commitment by developed countries to jointly mobilise USD 100 billion annually in climate finance from 2020. Nevertheless, this assessment is not just to facilitate improved access to climate change and disaster risk finance. More broadly, strengthening country systems will improve donor confidence to engage with Solomon Islands and catalyse the achievement of the sustainable development goals, which are linked to the national priorities of Solomon Islands as outlined in the National Development Strategy 2016–2035 (NDS).

The assessment has identified a number of recommendations for the Solomon Islands Government, which are summarised below and discussed in detail in the report. A draft Action Plan is also included, providing clear timeframes and suggested responsibilities for the implementation that is assigned to each recommendation. This is intended to assist the Solomon Islands Government in the progression of these recommendations, with the support of key partners.

Policies and Planning Analysis

1. Reflect Objective Four of the NDS (resilient and environmentally sustainable development with effective disaster risk management, response and recovery) as a cross-cutting issue relevant to all sectors in the next update to the Medium-Term Development Plan (MTDP), and link more sector development programs and plans to this objective.

2. Develop sector indicators to progress the long-term evaluation of the NDS – specifically benchmarking achievements towards Objective Four related to resilient development, climate change and disaster risk management.

3. Progress the development of a National Adaptation Plan (NAP) aligned with the risk resilient development approach outlined in the NDS and as a complementary policy to the drafted

Solomon Islands Climate Change and Disaster Risk Finance Assessment – Executive Summary2

National Disaster Management Plan (NDMP). When updating the Climate Change Disaster Risk Management (CCDRM) and other sector policies and plans – for example the National Climate Change Policy 2012–2017 (NCCP) – the NDS should now be reflected and focus on resilient development and CCDRM as cross-cutting issues within this.

4. The development of new policies and plans should ensure vertical integration to align national, provincial and community priorities, including targeted actions that are costed within policies, which can also help to ensure CCDRM activities are prioritised in the budget, and planning processes are effectively resourced.

5. Comprehensive consultations should be undertaken in the development and operationalisation of CCDRM policies and plans in order to ensure engagement of all stakeholders and provide clarity around the implementation role of different actors. This is critical for the NCCP when it expires in 2017. For the current drafted NDMP, it is recommended that there is a roll out to all provinces once this is approved.

6. Develop national mainstreaming guidelines to assist in identifying key entry points for line ministries in order to progress the inclusion of CCDRM as a cross-cutting issue in sectoral policies, plans and activities.

7. Look at opportunities for developing multi-sector policies for key CCDRM issues, such as food security, as an initial step towards greater coordination of relevant line ministries on these cross-cutting issues.

8. Progress the development of an NDC Financing Strategy, to identify and track external funding sources for progressing activities stipulated within the NDC. This is recommended as a joint activity between Ministry of Climate Change, Disaster Management and Meteorology (MECDM), Ministry of Finance and Treasury (MoFT) and Ministry of Development Planning and Aid Coordination (MDPAC).

9. Progress the finalisation and submission of the Second National Communication to the United Nations Framework Climate Change Convention (UNFCCC), to maintain Solomon Islands’ strong engagement and dialogue at the international level.

10. Strengthen the policy framework at the provincial level, identifying entry points for mainstreaming these issues more effectively into provincial plans. In the longer term, consider the development of specific provincial level climate change policies or ordinances.

11. Establish mechanisms to capture community level data and priorities, as well as local and traditional knowledge, and feed these back into both provincial and national policies.

12. Progress the development of a Low Emissions Development (LED) policy to complement the current CCDRM policy mix.

Funding Source Analysis

1. Now that the Tina River Hydropower Development Project (TRHDP) is approved by the Green Climate Fund (GCF) Board (at their meeting in April 2017), the Government should consider developing other projects to the GCF for the 2017/2018 period. There is scope for fast-tracking the readiness proposal and the request for NAP support, and further exploration of the GCF Private Sector Facility.


2. Having regular and targeted dialogue with bilateral partners may increase access to more bilateral support. However, Solomon Island must capitalise on its experience in engaging with a range of multilateral sources. Establishing and resourcing a dedicated Climate Change Finance Unit within MoFT will prove beneficial.

3. Solomon Islands should continue to advocate for more flexible modalities, such as direct budget support and national climate change trust fund arrangements. This will supplement the inefficiencies of a project-based approach. Pursuing a feasibility study on the merits of a national climate change fund with agencies such as United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will assist.

4. Supporting a national synthesis of the impacts/effectiveness of CCDRM projects accessed over the past 3 to 5 years would be useful.

5. The planned Climate Change Bill is an opportunity to legislate a mandate for all future CCDRM projects/activities by donors, government agencies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), civil society organisations (CSOs), faith-based groups or private sector to be registered with the MECDM Programme Management and Coordination Unit (PMCU). This will feed into the Development Assistance Database (DAD) that MDPAC is working towards reviving.

6. In order to promote fast implementation and sustainability of efforts, MECDM should seek new and strengthen existing public–public and public–private partnerships. Opportunity for other non-traditional CCDRM players and ministries such as Ministry of Provincial Government and Institutional Strengthening (MPGIS), Ministry for Women, Youths, Children and Family Affairs (MWYCFA), Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources (MFMR), Ministry of Health and Medical Services (MHMS) and Ministry of Human Resources Development (MEHRD) and state owned enterprises, including Solomon Power and Solomon Water, to be actively engaged and supported.

7. To the extent possible, all CCDRM projects should be reflected in the national budget.

8. Provincial governments are encouraged to develop CCDRM ordinances or legislation to align to the national budget planning and resourcing.

Public Financial Management and Expenditure Analysis

1. Assuming accreditation is sought, map out a pathway – Public Finance Management (PFM) reforms to meet fiduciary requirements (basic and specialised) for MoFT, and develop Environmental and Social Safeguards (ESS) and Gender Action Plan (GAP).

2. The Government should establish an implementation unit within MoFT, drawing on experience and expertise within the ministry and other line agencies in order to form the basis of a capable Project Implementation Unit (PIU). The Financial and Economic Development Unit (FEDU), the Debt Management Unit and the compliance area of the Procurement Unit contain key skills that could be drawn together to support the development of such a PIU with technical support from MECDM.

3. In pursuing accreditation for MoFT, the Government should look to learn from PFM reform and climate finance accreditation efforts undertaken elsewhere in the region (e.g. Samoa, Cook Islands).


4. Put in place an accreditation taskforce of key stakeholders including MoFT, MECDM, Ministry of Infrastructure Development (MID) – National Transport Fund (NTF), MDPAC and representatives of the civil society and private sector to oversee the accreditation efforts of the Government.

5. Design readiness programs to support reforms needed and seek out help to pursue accreditation through readiness grants and other assistance, including from the GCF Readiness Support and bilateral assistance from CROP agencies and partners.

6. Prepare a comprehensive financial strategy looking at the appropriate mix of financial instruments to address pre- and post-disaster requirements in the Solomon Islands.

Institutional Analysis

1. Progress National Climate Change legislation, which mandates climate change as a cross-sectoral issue, defines the role of MECDM in climate change and disaster risk reduction activities, and establishes a national coordination mechanism.

2. Undertake a review of the National Disaster Council Act 1989, to ensure it adequately reflects the current status of institutions and policy mandates as outlined in the drafted NDMP

3. Progress the national forestry bill, to mandate more effective action towards forest protection and management, aligned with the Solomon Islands Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation plus (REDD+) Roadmap.

4. Harmonise national legislation, which is currently in development in order to provide a more cohesive legal framework that promotes resilient development for the Solomon Islands. Consider the synergies with other draft legislation such as the Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Expressions of Culture Bill, which are currently in development through the Ministry of Tourism and Culture.

5. Develop a Training Register as an Annex to the MECDM Human Resource Development Plan (HRDP), which outlines capacity development needs and short-term trainings provided by partners.

6. Consider how the Provincial Government Strengthening Programme (PGSP) could be used as an entry point for mainstreaming aspects of CCDRM at the provincial level.

7. Utilise issues such as food security to shift towards an integrated programming approach across sectors.

8. Strengthen engagement between MECDM and other line ministries and relegate management of certain CCDRM initiatives to appropriate leading institutions (e.g. REDD+ focal point relegated to the Ministry of Forestry and Research)

9. Analyse the challenges faced with operationalising the National Climate Change Committee (NCCC) and the National Climate Change Working Group (NCCWG) as part of the NCCP review. Utilise lessons learnt and models being implemented at the provincial and sectoral levels, as well as in other countries to establish an effective national coordination mechanism. The engagement of MDPAC within such a mechanism is recommended.


10. Strengthen engagement between Climate Change Division (CCD) and National Disaster Management Office (NDMO) on disaster risk reduction and reflect the establishment and role of the Disaster and Climate Risk Committee (DCRC) (outlined in the drafted NDMP) in the proposed NAP. Clarify the linkages of this committee to a potential national coordination mechanism.

11. Strengthen the MECDM website as the key information source for CCDRM issues for other line ministries as well as external governmental stakeholders.

12. Establish national roundtables as an opportunity for dialogue and engagement with a broad range of stakeholders who are currently undertaking CCDRM work.

13. Institutionalise an iterative Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) process as a dedicated function of MECDM’s PMCU, in close collaboration with MDPAC’s M&E Unit.

14. Strengthen provincial level institutions through operationalising climate change committees and dedicating appropriate resourcing to ensure sustainability (through inclusion of costed items in relevant policies and plans). Look at the need for establishing provincial ordinances to strengthen the mandate for coordinating mechanisms at the provincial level.

15. Strengthen provincial disaster management committees to engage around issues of preparedness and recovery, in addition to disaster response, as stipulated in the drafted NDMP.

16. Clarify the role of Provincial Climate Change Committees and Provincial Disaster and Climate Risk Committees (P-DCRCs), and streamline these to effectively dedicate resources and avoid duplication.

17. Utilise current community-based awareness-raising and training programs presented through the Rural Development Programme (RDP) and other mechanisms for mainstreaming awareness around CCDRM at the community level.

18. Strengthen engagement with faith-based organisations, especially women’s and youth groups as potential implementers of CCDRM activities.

Human Capacity Analysis

1. MECDM PMCU to be adequately capacitated to play a key role in identifying and coordinating local specialists within Government (roster of experts) for project development and implementation.

2. All CCDRM projects accessed by Solomon Islands must have an embedded component related to capacity development and transfer of knowledge. This will ensure external consultants provide an added value to government.

3. MECDM and partners need to work closely with MPGIS and respective provincial governments to address the issues limiting provincial disaster officers or environment officers from undertaking their functions.

4. The Solomon Islands National University should be resourced to provide in-country capacity building related to CCDRM for government officers.

5. Donors and government agencies engaging in national scholarship opportunities must consult and provide information to both MEHRD and the Social Services Division within MDPAC.


6. Strengthen engagement with NGOs and capitalise on their presence and experience of working with communities.

7. Consider inclusion of officers from MoFT, Solomon Islands Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SICCI) and civil society in regional and international CCDRM meetings (e.g. the UNFCCC COP negotiations).

8. SICCI should consider convening an annual private sector forum with specific focus on financing for development, including climate change finance (e.g. GCF or regional organisations can be invited to facilitate).

9. Solomon Power should explore the recruitment of an environment engineer noting the State-Owned Enterprise’s (SOE’s) anticipated engagement with the Tina Hydro project and CCDRM.

10. Both provincial and national governments should explore a mechanism that can engage retired public servants at the community level who are willing to support CCDRM efforts.

11. Explore a human capacity development roadmap for CCDRM to plan for absorption of trained expertise at the end of project timelines.

Gender and Social Inclusion Analysis

1. Capacity: Build sufficient technical expertise and human resource capacity for gender and social inclusion into the development of programs across relevant ministries and departments. The assessment has highlighted the provincial level as needing the most investment in capacity.

2. Coordination: Allocate sufficient resources to support coordination mechanisms to ensure effective partnerships between ministries, with representative structures for women, youth, and persons with disabilities, and with relevant NGOs. This would include technical assistance to prepare relevant guidelines, strategic documents, possibly legislation, as well as administrative, secretariat and logistical costs.

3. Gender equality awareness: Widespread gender awareness is critical for addressing the perception that gender equality is unachievable in the Solomon Islands context. There is good precedent to demonstrate that well-integrated gender-sensitive programs with shared governance and shared benefits are possible and accepted in the social and cultural landscape.

●● Support efforts to raise awareness on gender equality and its policy and regulatory framework at all levels; for decision-makers at national and provincial levels; in communities to address the customary dominance of male leadership; and specifically for the selected National Implementing Entity (NIE).

4. Build on investments already made: There are several initiatives in the non-governmental sector or externally funded initiatives facilitated or supervised by Government, where there is good programming traction, strategic plans in place, good community engagement, experience and lessons learnt; however, programs need continued investment. In such opportunities, sustainability strategies for transitions to Government management and responsibility and eventual resourcing, should be considered.

5. Designate allocations within existing resources and new funding to support integration in the social sector: While there is investment and programming done for Gender and Social Inclusion (GSI) integration in the CCDRM sector, there is some lost opportunity in the social sector where it


is difficult to secure resources for the engagement of women, youth and others in CCDRM. With policy commitments in place and forthcoming, there is a ready-made opportunity to proceed to program development.

6. Mainstream gender and social inclusion across central Government sector planning and budgeting processes: MDPAC’s key role is implicit in the recommendation to support a strengthened focus on mainstreaming that works towards all sectors integrating gender and social inclusion from policy development, planning, resourcing, implementation and monitoring outcomes. The recommendation includes a greater focus on budgeting and resource mobilisation processes to recognise the importance and benefit of funding the integration of gender and social inclusion across sectors.

Development Effectiveness Analysis

1. In order to strengthen the coordination between Solomon Islands and its donors, NGOs and financial institutions, it is recommended that all aid information be communicated to the Aid Coordination Division of MDPAC. This is to include relevant information on all modes of assistance disbursed directly to recipients.

2. Improve coordination and delegation between donors – donors will need to consult each other and discuss among themselves the processes and procedures that need to be harmonised, and formulate key performance indicators (KPIs) that can be used for this harmonisation process.

3. Institutional capacity building – Government will need to identify its institutional capacity needs, beginning with capacity needs on areas directly related to the effective management of aid, before capacity building programs are formulated in order to be supported by donors.

4. Quality reporting – development partners have a moral obligation to report information relevant to their operations within Solomon Islands accurately and on a timely basis consistent with the Solomon Islands Government requirements. MDPAC will need to roll out public awareness on the new Development Cooperation Policy (DCP) to support this process.

5. Revive the DAD, but through a much simpler and cost-effective software arrangement. Dedicated capacity should also be supported to maintain such a database.

6. Solomon Islands should continue to advocate for donors working in the country to develop a standardised reporting template.

Conclusion

Solomon Islands is showing leadership in both the regional and international levels in addressing climate change and disaster risk management.

Although development partners and donors make an important contribution, the Solomon Islands Government is responsible for developing its capacity to access and manage climate change and disaster risk finance. This will require a whole-of-government approach and is beyond the scope and ability of one agency.

While continued advocacy for access is important, it is also crucial that strengthened national systems and increased use of those systems by development partners and private sector build capacity to


access and use these funds effectively.

It must be noted that a lot of these recommendations build on existing work or actions being planned by the Government, NGOs, private sector or development partners. In that context, some of the recommendations are reaffirmations instead of responding to specific gaps.

The Action Plan table in the next section can guide Solomon Islands’ efforts for improving access to climate change and disaster risk financing support from external sources. The Ministry of Environment, Climate Change, Disaster Management and Meteorology, through the Programme Management Coordination Unit and the National Climate Change Working Group (with the support of key partners) should monitor and evaluate progress, and ensure it is integrated and aligned with the Government’s overall development efforts outlined in the NDS.


Solo

mon

Isla

nds

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

and

Disa

ster

Ris

k Fi

nanc

e As

sess

men

t – A

ctio

n Pl

an

Rec

omm

enda

tions

Rel

evan

t PC

CFA

F Pi

llar1

Prio

r-ity

2017

2018

2019

Indi

cativ

e O

utpu

tsLe

ad

Agen

cyPo

tent

ial P

artn

ers

Spec

ific

Initi

ativ

es

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

1. In

corp

orat

e O

bjec

tive

Four

(R

esilie

nt a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tally

su

stai

nabl

e de

velo

pmen

t with

ef

fect

ive

disa

ster

risk

man

agem

ent,

resp

onse

and

reco

very

) of t

he N

DS

as a

cro

ss-c

uttin

g is

sue

in th

e M

DTP

upda

te a

nd d

evel

op s

ecto

r ind

icat

ors

for i

ts e

valu

atio

n.

PP, I

Med

Obj

ectiv

e Fo

ur is

refle

cted

in

the

MDT

P up

date

and

sec

tor

indi

cato

rs a

re d

evel

oped

.

MD

PAC

GIZ

/DFA

T C

limat

e C

hang

e Fi

nanc

e Re

adin

ess

for t

he

Paci

fic (C

FRP)

, SPC

/U

SAID

ISAC

C, U

SAID

C

limat

e Re

ady

proj

ects

.

2. F

orm

ulat

e an

NAP

alig

ned

to th

e N

DS

and

the

draf

t of t

he N

DM

P.PP

Hig

hN

AP is

form

ulat

ed a

nd

cost

ed.

MEC

DM

UN

DP,

AD

B,

Com

mon

wea

lth

Secr

etar

iat T

echn

ical

As

sist

ance

(Com

Sec

TA),

GC

F

3. D

evel

op a

con

sulta

tive

mec

hani

sm

for t

he o

pera

tiona

lisat

ion

and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

CC

DRM

pol

icie

s an

d pl

ans

incl

udin

g th

e ro

ll-ou

t of

plan

s to

the

prov

ince

s.

PP, I

Hig

hG

uide

lines

for c

onsu

ltatio

n an

d im

plem

enta

tion

are

esta

blis

hed.

MEC

DM

in

cons

ulta

tion

with

pro

v-in

ces

Wor

ld B

ank

(WB)

, U

ND

P, S

PC/U

SAID

IS

ACC

, rel

evan

t NG

Os

4. D

evel

op n

atio

nal m

ains

tream

ing

guid

elin

es to

ass

ist l

ine

min

istri

es

or s

ecto

rs w

ith id

entif

ying

and

pr

ogre

ssin

g C

CD

RM is

sues

in

plan

ning

and

coo

rdin

atio

n, u

sing

an

inte

grat

ed a

ppro

ach.

PP, I

Hig

hN

atio

nal m

ains

tream

ing

guid

elin

es a

re d

evel

oped

an

d aw

aren

ess

cond

ucte

d.

MEC

DM

and

M

DPA

CG

IZ/D

FAT

CFR

P,

SPC

/USA

ID IS

ACC

, U

SAID

Clim

ate

Read

y pr

ojec

ts, P

IFS/

WB

Paci

fic R

esilie

nce

Prog

ram

(PRE

P)

5. D

evel

op s

peci

fic p

rovi

ncia

l clim

ate

chan

ge p

olic

ies

or o

rdin

ance

s.PP

, IM

edPr

ovin

cial

clim

ate

chan

ge

polic

ies

deve

lope

d.

MPG

IS a

nd

MEC

DM

UN

DP,

bila

tera

l pa

rtner

s, C

omSe

c

6. E

stab

lish

a da

taba

se fo

r co

mm

unity

leve

l dat

a an

d pr

iorit

ies

incl

udin

g tra

ditio

nal k

now

ledg

e to

sup

port

prov

inci

al a

nd n

atio

nal

polic

y fo

rmul

atio

n.

PP, I

Low

Dat

abas

e is

mai

ntai

ned

and

upda

ted

regu

larly

.M

PGIS

, M

ECD

MN

GO

s, U

ND

P, b

ilate

ral

partn

ers

(DFA

T, M

FAT)

1 PP

– P

olic

y an

d Pl

anni

ng; I

– In

stitu

tions

; FS

– Fu

ndin

g So

urce

s; P

FME

– Pu

blic

Fin

anci

al M

anag

emen

t and

Exp

endi

ture

; GSI

– G

ende

r and

Soc

ial I

nclu

sion

; HC

– H

uman

Cap

acity

; D

E –

Dev

elop

men

t Effe

ctiv

enes

s


Rec

omm

enda

tions

Rel

evan

t PC

CFA

F Pi

llar1

Prio

r-ity

2017

2018

2019

Indi

cativ

e O

utpu

tsLe

ad

Agen

cyPo

tent

ial P

artn

ers

Spec

ific

Initi

ativ

es

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

7. P

rogr

ess

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f a

Low

Em

issi

ons

Dev

elop

men

t (LE

D)

polic

y.

PPM

edLE

D po

licy

is d

rafte

d.M

ECD

M a

nd

MoF

RAs

ian

Dev

elop

men

t Ba

nk (A

DB)

, GC

F,

UN

DP

8. E

stab

lish

and

reso

urci

ng a

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Fina

nce

Uni

t with

in M

oFT.

IH

igh

Clim

ate

finan

ce u

nit i

s es

-ta

blis

hed.

MoF

T an

d M

ECD

MSI

G to

set

up

unit

and

real

loca

tion

of

staf

f res

pons

ibilit

ies

(if n

eces

sary

) with

pa

rtner

s fu

ndin

g ad

ditio

nal p

ositi

ons

(pro

ject

s, U

ND

P,

Com

Sec

TA, D

FAT,

AD

B, e

tc.).

9. E

xplo

re a

feas

ibilit

y st

udy

on th

e m

erit

of a

nat

iona

l clim

ate

chan

ge

fund

.

FS, P

P, I,

PF

ME

Med

Feas

ibilit

y st

udy

on a

nat

ion-

al c

limat

e fu

nd is

initi

ated

.M

ECD

MU

ND

P

10. C

ondu

ct a

nat

iona

l syn

thes

is o

f th

e im

pact

s/ef

fect

iven

ess

of C

CD

RM

proj

ects

acc

esse

d ov

er th

e pa

st 3

to

5 ye

ars.

All

Med

Nat

iona

l syn

thes

is o

f the

C

CD

RM p

roje

cts

impa

cts/

effe

ctiv

enes

s is

pro

gres

sed.

MEC

DM

and

M

DPA

CPI

FS, S

PREP

, SPC

, U

ND

P

11. S

treng

then

exi

stin

g pu

blic

and

pr

ivat

e pa

rtner

ship

s fo

r eng

agem

ent

and

supp

ort i

nclu

ding

the

GC

F Pr

ivat

e Se

ctor

Fac

ility

(PSF

).

I, H

CM

edRe

gula

r mee

ting/

upda

te is

co

nduc

ted

and

awar

enes

s of

the

GC

F PS

F sp

read

.

MoF

T an

d SI

CC

IAD

B, E

U, G

CF,

PIF

S

12. I

mpr

ove

coor

dina

tion

betw

een

MEC

DM

, MD

PAC

and

MoF

T to

en

sure

that

all

CC

DRM

pro

ject

s ar

e re

flect

ed in

the

natio

nal b

udge

t.

I, FS

, PF

ME

Hig

hC

CD

RM p

roje

cts

are

incl

ud-

ed in

the

natio

nal b

udge

t. M

ECD

M,

MoF

T, M

D-

PAC

SIG

to ta

ke th

e le

ad

with

sup

port

from

PI

FS, S

PC/U

SAID

IS

ACC

, UN

DP

13. P

repa

re a

n ac

cred

itatio

n ac

tion

plan

dra

win

g fro

m o

ther

PI

Cs’

exp

erie

nces

(e.g

. Sam

oa,

Coo

k Is

.) in

clud

ing

the

form

ulat

ion

of E

nviro

nmen

tal a

nd S

ocia

l Sa

fegu

ards

(ESS

) and

Gen

der A

ctio

n Pl

an (G

AP).

PP, I

, PF

ME

Med

Accr

edita

tion

plan

is p

re-

pare

d in

clud

ing

Term

s of

Re

fere

nce

(ToR

) for

TA

(ESS

an

d G

AP p

olic

y fo

rmul

atio

n).

MEC

DM

SPRE

P, G

IZ/D

FAT

CFR

P pr

ojec

t, U

SAID

C

limat

e Re

ady,

UN

DP,

AD

B


Rec

omm

enda

tions

Rel

evan

t PC

CFA

F Pi

llar1

Prio

r-ity

2017

2018

2019

Indi

cativ

e O

utpu

tsLe

ad

Agen

cyPo

tent

ial P

artn

ers

Spec

ific

Initi

ativ

es

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

13.1

Est

ablis

h an

acc

redi

tatio

n ta

skfo

rce

that

is re

pres

enta

tive

of a

ll ke

y st

akeh

olde

rs s

uch

as

gove

rnm

ent,

priv

ate

sect

or a

nd c

ivil

soci

ety.

PFM

E, I,

Hig

hTo

R fo

r tas

kfor

ce is

pre

-pa

red

and

set u

p.

MEC

DM

USA

ID C

limat

e Re

ady,

U

ND

P, S

PREP

, AD

B

13.2

Des

ign

appr

opria

te re

adin

ess

prog

ram

s to

be

supp

orte

d un

der t

he

GC

F Re

adin

ess

Supp

ort a

nd o

ther

bi

late

ral a

ssis

tanc

e.

PFM

E, I

Hig

hRe

adin

ess

prog

ram

s ar

e pr

epar

ed a

nd s

ubm

itted

. M

ECD

M a

nd

MoF

TSP

REP,

GIZ

/DFA

T-C

FRP,

USA

ID C

limat

e Re

ady,

PIF

S, C

omSe

c

14. E

stab

lish

a PI

U w

ithin

MoF

T,

draw

n fro

m in

tern

al e

xper

ienc

es a

nd

tech

nica

l sup

port

from

MEC

DM

.

PP, I

Med

PIU

is e

stab

lishe

d.

MoF

TAD

B, U

ND

P, W

orld

Ba

nk &

bila

tera

l pa

rtner

s

15. D

evel

op a

fina

ncia

l stra

tegy

lo

okin

g at

the

appr

opria

te m

ix o

f fin

anci

al in

stru

men

ts to

add

ress

pre

- an

d po

st-d

isas

ter r

equi

rem

ents

.

PFM

EH

igh

Fina

ncia

l stra

tegy

is p

re-

pare

d.

MoF

T, M

D-

PAC

ADB,

Pac

ific

Fina

ncia

l Te

chni

cal A

ssis

tanc

e C

entre

(PFT

AC)

16. S

eek

appr

oval

of t

he n

atio

nal

clim

ate

chan

ge le

gisl

atio

n.I,P

PH

igh

Nat

iona

l clim

ate

chan

ge

legi

slat

ion

is a

ppro

ved

and

natio

nal c

oord

inat

ion

mec

h-an

ism

is e

stab

lishe

d.

MEC

DM

SIG

taki

ng th

e le

ad

17. R

evie

w th

e N

atio

nal D

isas

ter

Cou

ncil

Act 1

989.

I, PP

Low

Revi

ew o

f the

Nat

iona

l D

isas

ter C

ounc

il Ac

t is

initi

ated

.

MEC

DM

NZ

MFA

T, U

ND

P, S

PC,

UN

ISD

R, D

FAT

18. A

ppro

val o

f the

nat

iona

l for

estry

bi

ll.

I,PP

Med

Nat

iona

l For

estry

Bill

is

appr

oved

and

aw

aren

ess

cond

ucte

d.

MoF

RSI

G ta

king

the

lead

19. H

arm

onis

e dr

aft o

f nat

iona

l cl

imat

e ch

ange

legi

slat

ion

with

ot

her l

egis

latio

n be

ing

deve

lope

d (P

rote

ctio

n of

Tra

ditio

nal K

now

ledg

e an

d Ex

pres

sion

s of

Cul

ture

Bill)

to

pro

vide

a m

ore

cohe

sive

lega

l fra

mew

ork

and

prom

ote

resi

lient

de

velo

pmen

t.

I,PP

Med

Legi

slat

ions

that

pro

mot

e sy

nerg

ies

and

com

plem

ent

CC

DRM

act

iviti

es.

MEC

DM

UN

DP,

SPR

EP, P

IFS/

WB

PREP

and

bila

tera

l pa

rtner

s.


Rec

omm

enda

tions

Rel

evan

t PC

CFA

F Pi

llar1

Prio

r-ity

2017

2018

2019

Indi

cativ

e O

utpu

tsLe

ad

Agen

cyPo

tent

ial P

artn

ers

Spec

ific

Initi

ativ

es

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

20. D

evel

op a

trai

ning

regi

ster

as

an A

nnex

to th

e M

ECD

M H

uman

Re

sour

ce D

evel

opm

ent P

lan

(HRD

P),

whi

ch o

utlin

es c

apac

ity d

evel

opm

ent

need

s an

d sh

ort-t

erm

trai

ning

s pr

ovid

ed b

y pa

rtner

s.

I, H

CM

edTr

aini

ng re

gist

er is

dev

el-

oped

and

incl

uded

with

the

MEC

DM

HRD

P.

MEC

DM

and

M

PSAD

B, D

FAT,

UN

DP,

Ja

pane

se In

tern

atio

nal

Coo

pera

tion

Agen

cy

(JIC

A)

21. S

treng

then

eng

agem

ent b

etw

een

MEC

DM

and

oth

er li

ne m

inis

tries

an

d re

lega

te m

anag

emen

t of c

erta

in

CC

DRM

initi

ativ

es to

app

ropr

iate

le

adin

g in

stitu

tions

(e.g

. RED

D+

foca

l po

int r

eleg

ated

to th

e M

oFR)

IM

edRo

les

are

clea

rly d

emar

cat-

ed a

nd C

CD

RM in

itiat

ives

un

derta

ken

by re

leva

nt li

ne

agen

cies

.

MEC

DM

SIG

taki

ng th

e le

ad

22. S

treng

then

the

MEC

DM

web

site

as

the

key

info

rmat

ion

sour

ce

for C

CD

RM is

sues

, for

oth

er li

ne

min

istri

es a

s w

ell a

s ex

tern

al

gove

rnm

enta

l sta

keho

lder

s.

IH

igh

Web

site

is im

prov

ed w

ith

key

CC

DRM

info

rmat

ion

read

ily a

cces

sibl

e.

MEC

DM

Bila

tera

l par

tner

s, G

IZ/

DFA

T-C

FRP,

SPC

/U

SAID

ISAC

C

23. E

stab

lish

natio

nal r

ound

tabl

es

as a

n op

portu

nity

for d

ialo

gue

and

enga

gem

ent w

ith a

bro

ad ra

nge

of s

take

hold

ers

who

are

cur

rent

ly

unde

rtaki

ng C

CD

RM w

ork.

IH

igh

Roun

dtab

le d

iscu

ssio

n is

in

itiat

ed a

nd h

eld

regu

larly

. M

ECD

MU

ND

P, S

PC/U

SAID

IS

ACC

and

bila

tera

l pa

rtner

s

24. I

nstit

utio

nalis

e an

iter

ativ

e m

onito

ring

and

eval

uatio

n pr

oces

s as

a d

edic

ated

func

tion

of M

ECD

M’s

PM

CU,

in c

lose

col

labo

ratio

n w

ith

MD

PAC

’s M

&E U

nit.

I, PP

Hig

hM

&E p

roce

ss is

impl

emen

t-ed

.M

ECD

M,

MD

PAC

ADB,

UN

DP,

SPC

/U

SAID

ISAC

C, P

FTAC

25. S

treng

then

pro

vinc

ial l

evel

in

stitu

tions

thro

ugh

oper

atio

nalis

ing

clim

ate

chan

ge c

omm

ittee

s an

d de

dica

ting

appr

opria

te re

sour

cing

to

ens

ure

sust

aina

bilit

y (th

roug

h in

clus

ion

of c

oste

d ite

ms

in re

leva

nt

polic

ies

and

plan

s).

I, PP

,M

edPr

ovin

cial

clim

ate

chan

ge

com

mitt

ees

are

esta

blis

hed

and

supp

orte

d.

MPG

IS,

MEC

DM

UN

DP,

SPC

/USA

ID

ISAC

C a

nd b

ilate

ral

partn

ers


Rec

omm

enda

tions

Rel

evan

t PC

CFA

F Pi

llar1

Prio

r-ity

2017

2018

2019

Indi

cativ

e O

utpu

tsLe

ad

Agen

cyPo

tent

ial P

artn

ers

Spec

ific

Initi

ativ

es

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

26. S

treng

then

pro

vinc

ial d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent c

omm

ittee

s to

eng

age

arou

nd is

sues

of p

repa

redn

ess

and

reco

very

, in

addi

tion

to d

isas

ter

resp

onse

, as

stip

ulat

ed in

the

draf

ted

ND

MP.

I, PP

Hig

hAw

aren

ess

and

train

ing

are

cond

ucte

d fo

r the

Pro

vinc

ial

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Com

mitt

ee.

MPG

IS,

MEC

DM

SPRE

P, S

PC, U

ND

P an

d bi

late

ral p

artn

ers

27. C

larif

y th

e ro

le o

f pro

vinc

ial

clim

ate

chan

ge c

omm

ittee

s an

d P-

DC

RCs

and

stre

amlin

e th

ese

to

effe

ctiv

ely

dedi

cate

reso

urce

s an

d av

oid

dupl

icat

ion.

I, PP

Med

Awar

enes

s an

d tra

inin

g ar

e co

nduc

ted

for t

he P

rovi

ncia

l C

limat

e C

hang

e C

omm

ittee

.

MPG

IS,

MEC

DM

SPRE

P, U

ND

P an

d bi

late

ral p

artn

ers

28. U

tilis

e cu

rrent

com

mun

ity-b

ased

aw

aren

ess-

rais

ing

and

train

ing

prog

ram

s pr

esen

ted

thro

ugh

the

Rura

l Dev

elop

men

t Pro

gram

me

(RD

P) a

nd o

ther

mec

hani

sms

for

mai

nstre

amin

g aw

aren

ess

arou

nd

CC

DRM

at t

he c

omm

unity

leve

l.

I, H

CLo

wTr

aini

ng a

nd a

war

enes

s ar

e co

nduc

ted.

M

PGIS

, M

ECD

MN

GO

s, W

B RD

P an

d SP

REP

29. S

treng

then

eng

agem

ent w

ith

faith

-bas

ed o

rgan

isat

ions

, esp

ecia

lly

wom

en’s

and

you

th g

roup

s as

po

tent

ial i

mpl

emen

ters

of C

CD

RM

activ

ities

to s

hare

exp

erie

nces

and

le

sson

s le

arnt

at c

omm

unity

leve

l.

I, G

SIM

edW

omen

, you

th a

nd fa

ith-

base

d or

gani

satio

ns a

re

incl

uded

in th

e pr

ojec

t st

eerin

g co

mm

ittee

.

MW

YCFA

, M

ECD

MG

IZ/D

FAT

CFR

P, S

PC/

USA

ID IS

ACC

, UN

W

omen

, SPC

, UN

DP

PRRP

30. S

treng

then

cap

acity

at t

he

MEC

DM

PM

CU

to p

lay

a ke

y ro

le in

id

entif

ying

and

coo

rdin

atin

g lo

cal

spec

ialis

ts w

ithin

Gov

ernm

ent (

rost

er

of e

xper

ts) f

or p

roje

ct d

evel

opm

ent

and

impl

emen

tatio

n.

HC

, IH

igh

Trai

ning

and

dev

elop

men

t of

offi

cial

s se

lect

ed b

y M

ECD

M.

MEC

DM

UN

DP,

PIF

S, S

PC/

USA

ID IS

ACC

31. I

ncor

pora

te c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent a

nd k

now

ledg

e tra

nsfe

r co

mpo

nent

s in

all

CC

DRM

pro

ject

s ac

cess

ed b

y So

lom

on Is

land

s.

HC

Med

CC

DRM

pro

ject

s.

MEC

DM

SIG

to d

rive

reco

mm

enda

tion


Rec

omm

enda

tions

Rel

evan

t PC

CFA

F Pi

llar1

Prio

r-ity

2017

2018

2019

Indi

cativ

e O

utpu

tsLe

ad

Agen

cyPo

tent

ial P

artn

ers

Spec

ific

Initi

ativ

es

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

32. P

rovi

de re

sour

ces

to S

olom

on

Isla

nds

Nat

iona

l Uni

vers

ity fo

r in-

coun

try c

apac

ity b

uild

ing

rela

ted

to

CC

DRM

for g

over

nmen

t offi

cers

.

HC

, IM

edAl

loca

tion

of re

sour

ces

in

the

budg

et.

MD

PAC

and

M

oFT

Bila

tera

l par

tner

s

33. D

onor

s an

d go

vern

men

t ag

enci

es e

ngag

ing

in n

atio

nal

scho

lars

hip

oppo

rtuni

ties

mus

t co

nsul

t and

pro

vide

info

rmat

ion

to b

oth

MEH

RD a

nd th

e So

cial

Se

rvic

es D

ivis

ion

with

in M

DPA

C.

HC

, IM

edRe

port

on s

chol

arsh

ip s

up-

port

by d

onor

s is

ava

ilabl

e.

MEH

RD a

nd

MD

PAC

Bila

tera

l par

tner

s

34. I

nclu

de o

ffice

rs fr

om M

oFT,

SI

CC

I and

civ

il so

ciet

y in

regi

onal

an

d in

tern

atio

nal C

CD

RM m

eetin

gs

(e.g

. the

UN

FCC

C C

OP

nego

tiatio

ns).

HC

, IM

edRe

leva

nt o

ffici

als

are

part

of

the

mee

ting

dele

gatio

n.

MEC

DM

UN

FCC

C fo

cal p

oint

to

driv

e

35. C

onve

ne a

n an

nual

priv

ate

sect

or fo

rum

with

spe

cific

focu

s on

fin

anci

ng fo

r dev

elop

men

t, in

clud

ing

clim

ate

chan

ge fi

nanc

e (e

.g. G

CF

or

regi

onal

org

anis

atio

ns c

an b

e in

vite

d to

faci

litat

e).

HC

, I, F

S,

DE

Med

An in

clus

ive

priv

ate

sect

or

foru

m is

con

vene

d w

ith a

w

ell-d

evel

oped

age

nda.

SIC

CI

ADB/

GC

F an

d ex

istin

g re

late

d pr

ojec

ts –

GIZ

/D

FAT

CFR

P, S

PC/

USA

ID IS

ACC

and

U

SAID

Rea

dy

36. R

ecru

it a

pote

ntia

l env

ironm

ent

engi

neer

by

Solo

mon

Pow

er n

otin

g th

e SO

E’s

antic

ipat

ed e

ngag

emen

t w

ith th

e TR

HD

P an

d C

CD

RM.

HC

Med

Envi

ronm

ent e

ngin

eer i

s re

crui

ted.

So

lom

on

Pow

erG

CF,

WB,

DFA

T or

do

mes

tic re

sour

ces

37. E

stab

lish

a m

echa

nism

w

here

by th

e pr

ovin

cial

and

nat

iona

l go

vern

men

ts c

ould

eng

age

retir

ed

publ

ic s

erva

nts

at th

e co

mm

unity

le

vel w

ho a

re w

illing

to s

uppo

rt C

CD

RM e

fforts

.

HC

Low

Gui

delin

es a

re e

stab

lishe

d fo

r the

eng

agem

ent o

f re

tiree

s.

MEC

DM

and

M

PGIS

SIG

to le

ad

38. E

xplo

re a

hum

an c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent r

oadm

ap fo

r CC

DRM

to

pla

n fo

r abs

orpt

ion

of tr

aine

d ex

perti

se a

t the

end

of p

roje

ct

timel

ines

.

HC

Low

Hum

an c

apac

ity d

evel

op-

men

t roa

dmap

is in

itiat

ed.

MEC

DM

and

M

PSU

ND

P, b

ilate

ral

partn

ers


Rec

omm

enda

tions

Rel

evan

t PC

CFA

F Pi

llar1

Prio

r-ity

2017

2018

2019

Indi

cativ

e O

utpu

tsLe

ad

Agen

cyPo

tent

ial P

artn

ers

Spec

ific

Initi

ativ

es

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

39. B

uild

cap

acity

and

incl

ude

tech

nica

l exp

ertis

e fo

r gen

der a

nd

soci

al in

clus

ion

and

hum

an re

sour

ce

capa

city

into

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f pr

ogra

ms,

and

equ

ally

to in

clud

e th

is

as a

com

pone

nt in

rele

vant

min

istri

es

and

depa

rtmen

ts re

late

d to

the

prog

ram

.

HC

, GSI

Hig

hPo

ol o

f tec

hnic

al e

xper

tise

is id

entif

ied.

M

WYC

FABi

late

ral p

artn

ers

and

exis

ting

regi

onal

in

itiat

ives

suc

h as

Re

gion

al T

echn

ical

Su

ppor

t Mec

hani

sm

(RTS

M),

Paci

fic

Tech

nica

l Ass

ista

nce

Mec

hani

sm (P

ACTA

M),

etc.

, SPC

, UN

Wom

en,

UN

DP

PRRP

40. P

rovi

de s

uffic

ient

reso

urce

s to

su

ppor

t coo

rdin

atio

n an

d to

pro

mot

e ef

fect

ive

partn

ersh

ips

betw

een

min

istri

es, w

ith re

pres

enta

tive

stru

ctur

es fo

r wom

en, y

outh

, and

pe

rson

s w

ith d

isab

ilitie

s an

d w

ith

rele

vant

NG

Os.

GSI

, IM

edAl

loca

tion

of re

sour

ces

in

the

budg

et.

MoF

T an

d M

WYC

FABi

late

ral p

artn

ers

41. I

ncre

ase

gend

er e

qual

ity

awar

enes

s in

clud

ing

polic

y an

d re

gula

tory

fram

ewor

k at

all

leve

ls to

ad

dres

s th

e cu

stom

ary

dom

inan

ce

of m

ale

lead

ersh

ip a

nd s

peci

fical

ly

for t

he s

elec

ted

NIE

.

GSI

, I, P

PM

edTr

aini

ng a

nd a

war

enes

s ar

e co

nduc

ted.

M

WYC

FA

and

MEC

DM

SPC

, UN

Wom

en,

UN

DP

PRRP

42. F

orm

ulat

e su

stai

nabl

e st

rate

gies

fo

r CC

DRM

pro

ject

s tra

nsiti

onin

g to

Gov

ernm

ent m

anag

emen

t, ut

ilisin

g go

od p

ract

ices

and

less

ons

lear

nt fr

om e

xter

nally

fund

ed

initi

ativ

es im

plem

ente

d by

the

non-

gove

rnm

enta

l sec

tor.

PP, I

Med

Sust

aina

ble

stra

tegi

es to

in

clud

e le

sson

s le

arnt

from

th

e pr

ojec

ts.

MEC

DM

Bila

tera

l par

tner

s

43. M

ains

tream

gen

der a

nd s

ocia

l in

clus

ion

acro

ss c

entra

l Gov

ernm

ent

sect

or p

lann

ing

proc

esse

s.

GSI

, IM

edM

ains

tream

ing

proc

ess

is

deve

lope

d.

MW

YCFA

an

d M

DPA

CSP

C, U

N W

omen

, U

ND

P PR

RP, P

IFS


Rec

omm

enda

tions

Rel

evan

t PC

CFA

F Pi

llar1

Prio

r-ity

2017

2018

2019

Indi

cativ

e O

utpu

tsLe

ad

Agen

cyPo

tent

ial P

artn

ers

Spec

ific

Initi

ativ

es

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

44. S

treng

then

coo

rdin

atio

n be

twee

n So

lom

on Is

land

s an

d its

don

ors,

N

GO

s an

d fin

anci

al in

stitu

tions

to

ens

ure

that

all

aid

info

rmat

ion

is c

omm

unic

ated

to th

e Ai

d C

oord

inat

ion

Div

isio

n of

MD

PAC

.

DE,

FS

Hig

hTi

mel

y an

d co

nsis

tent

re

porti

ng o

f inf

orm

atio

n to

M

DPA

C.

MD

PAC

Bila

tera

l par

tner

s an

d do

nors

45. I

mpr

ove

coor

dina

tion

and

dele

gatio

n be

twee

n do

nors

on

the

proc

esse

s an

d pr

oced

ures

to b

e ha

rmon

ised

and

form

ulat

e KP

Is

that

can

be

used

as

perfo

rman

ce

indi

cato

rs fo

r thi

s ha

rmon

isat

ion

proc

ess.

DE,

PP

Med

KPIs

are

form

ulat

ed to

im

prov

e co

ordi

natio

n an

d de

lega

tion

betw

een

dono

rs.

MD

PAC

GIZ

/DFA

T C

FRP,

SPC

/U

SAID

ISAC

C, b

ilate

ral

partn

ers/

dono

rs

46. R

evie

w c

apac

ity n

eeds

on

area

s di

rect

ly re

late

d to

the

effe

ctiv

e m

anag

emen

t of C

CD

R fin

ance

, be

fore

pro

gram

s ar

e fo

rmul

ated

in

orde

r to

be s

uppo

rted

by d

onor

s.

DE,

HC

Low

Cap

acity

nee

ds a

re re

-vi

ewed

and

inco

rpor

ated

in

proj

ect p

ropo

sals

that

are

to

be e

xter

nally

sup

porte

d.

GIZ

/DFA

T C

FRP,

SPC

/U

SAID

ISAC

C

47. P

ublic

aw

aren

ess

on th

e ne

w

(DC

P to

ens

ure

accu

rate

and

tim

ely

repo

rting

to M

DPA

C.

DE

Hig

hPu

blic

aw

aren

ess

on th

e D

CP

is c

ondu

cted

. M

DPA

CBi

late

ral p

artn

ers

48. R

eviv

e th

e DA

D us

ing

sim

ple

and

cost

-effe

ctiv

e so

ftwar

e in

clud

ing

dedi

cate

d su

ppor

t to

mai

ntai

n th

e da

taba

se.

DE,

FS

Med

DAD

is m

aint

aine

d an

d up

date

d re

gula

rly.

MD

PAC

Don

ors

and

bila

tera

l pa

rtner

s

49. D

evel

op a

sta

ndar

dise

d te

mpl

ate

for e

ase

of re

porti

ng to

the

bila

tera

l pa

rtner

s/do

nors

.

DE,

FS

Med

Stan

dard

repo

rting

tem

plat

e is

pre

pare

d.

MD

PAC

Bila

tera

l par

tner

s

PACIFIC ISLANDSFORUM SECRETARIAT

AustralianAid U N

D P

Supported by:



Executive Summary September 2017



solomon islands climate change and disaster risk finance...

Documents