solution 2 - eduardo fradkineduardo.physics.illinois.edu/phys561/phys561-2-2015-solutions.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Solution 2
October 14, 2015
1 Antiferromagnetic Spin Waves
1.1
The Heisenberg Hamiltonian is
H = J
N/2∑n=−N/2+1
Sk(n) · Sk(n+ 1)
=J
2
∑j
(S+(n) · S− + S−(n) · S+(n+ 1)
)+ JS3(n) · S3(n+ 1) (1)
where S− = S1 − iS2 and S+ = S1 + iS2.To calculate the quantum mechanical equations of motion obeyed by
S±(j) and S3(j), we first need to calculate the commutators
[S+(j), H] =J
2S3(j)(S+(j − 1) + S+(j + 1))− J
2S+(j)(S3(j − 1) + S3(j + 1))
(2)
where we used
[S3, S±] = ±S±[S+, S−] = 2S3 (3)
Similarly, we can calculate [S−(j), H] and [S3(j), H].
1
The Heisenberg equations of motion are
∂0S+(j) = −iJ
2
[S3(j)(S+(j − 1) + S+(j + 1))− S+(j)(S3(j − 1) + S3(j + 1))
]∂0S
−(j) = −iJ2
[−S3(j)(S−(j − 1) + S−(j + 1))− S−(j)(S3(j − 1) + S3(j + 1))
]∂0S3(j) = −iJ
4
[S+(j)(S−(j − 1) + S−(j + 1) + S−(j)(S+(j − 1) + S+(j + 1))
](4)
They are non-linear equations. This suggests that the Heisenberg model ingeneral is not a free bosonic system.
1.2
For the even sites, by using Eq.(8), we have
S+|n〉 =√
2S
[1− n(j)
2S
] 12
a(j)|n〉 =
[2S
(1− n− 1
2S
)n
] 12
|n− 1〉
S−|n〉 =[2S(n+ 1)(1− n
2S)] 1
2 |n+ 1〉 (5)
From the above equation, we have (for the even sites)
n(j)|S, S〉 = (S − S3(j))|S, S〉 = 0
n(j)|S,−S〉 = 2S|S,−S〉 (6)
Hence Eq.(7) and Eq.(8) are consistent with Eq.(4).
1.3
The Heisenberg Hamiltonian is
H = Heven +Hodd
=∑
j∈evenJS[a†(j)a(j) + b†(j + 1)b(j + 1)
]+ JS
[(1− n(j)
2S)1/2(1− n(j + 1)
2S)1/2a(j)b(j + 1) + a†(j)b†(j + 1)(1− n(j)
2S)1/2(1− n(j + 1)
2S)1/2
]+ Ja†(j)a(j)b†(j + 1)b(j + 1)− S2 +
∑j∈odd
(a↔ b) (7)
2
1.4
In the semiclassical limit S → ∞, for the above Hamiltonian, if we onlyinclude terms which are of order 1/S, the Hamiltonian is
Heven = JS∑
j∈even
[a(j)b(j + 1) + a†(j)b†(j + 1) + a†(j)a(j) + b†(j + 1)b(j + 1)− S
]Hodd = JS
∑j∈odd
[b(j)a(j + 1) + b†(j)a†(j + 1) + b†(j)b(j) + a†(j + 1)a(j + 1)− S
](8)
The above Hamiltonian takes a quadratic form.
1.5
In the semiclassical limit, the equations of motion becomes
∂0a(j) = −iJS2
[b†(j − 1) + b†(j + 1)− 2a(j)
]∂0a
†(j) = −iJS2
[b(j − 1) + b(j + 1)− 2a†(j)
](9)
The above result is for the even j. For the odd j, we only need to switcha↔ b to get the similar result. The equations of motion are now linear. Theterm n(j)n(j + 1) is neglected.
1.6
By using the Fourier transformation
a(q) =
√2
N
∑j∈even
eiqj a(j)
b(q) =
√2
N
∑j∈odd
e−iqj b(j) (10)
The Hamiltonian can be written as
H = 2SJ∑q
[a(q)b(q) cos(q) + a†(q)b†(q) cos(q) + a†a(q) + b†(q)b(q)− N
2S
](11)
3
By performing the canonical transformation
c(q) = cosh(θ)a(q) + sinh(θ)b†(q)
d(q) = cosh(θ)b(q) + sinh(θ)a†(q) (12)
The Hamiltonian has off-diagonal term cos(q)(cosh2(θ) + sinh2(θ))c(q)d(q)−2 cosh(θ) sinh(θ)d(q)c(q). To diagonalize the Hamiltonian, this term is equalto zero and this requires that
cos(q) = tanh(2θ) (13)
The Hamiltonian after diagonalization takes the following form
HSW = E0 +
∫ π2
−π2
dq
2πω(q) (nc(q) + nd(q)) (14)
where ω(q) = | sin(q)|.
1.7
The ground state satisfies
c(q)|GS〉 = d(q)|GS〉 = 0 (15)
1.8
The single particle eigenstate can be generated by c†(q) or d†(q).
c†(q)|GS〉 = |q, 1〉,d†(q)|GS〉 = |q, 2〉 (16)
The dispersion relation is
E(q) = 2NJS| sin(q)| (17)
It equals to zero when q = nπ. Since q ∈ [−π2, π
2], when q is around zero, the
energy of excited state goes to zero. Around q = 0,
E(q) ≈ 2NJS|q| (18)
The energy vanishes linearly as the momentum q approaches to zero.
4
1.9
In the spin wave approximation,
S+(j) =∑q
e−iqj√
2S(cosh θc†(q)− sinh θd(q))
S−(j) =∑q
eiqj√
2S(cosh θc(q)− sinh θd†(q)) (19)
When both n and n′ are even or odd numbers,
D+−(jt, j′t′) = −i〈GS|T S+(j, t)S−(j′, t′)|GS〉
= −4Si∑q
e−iEq(t−t′)θ(t− t′)〈GS| cosh2 θc†(q)c(q) + sinh2 θd(q)d†(q)|GS〉
− 4Si∑q
eiEq(t−t′)θ(t′ − t)〈GS| cosh2 θc†(q)c(q) + sinh2 θd(q)d†(q)|GS〉
(20)
The propagator in the momentum space is
D+−(q) = 4Si
∫dt[θ(∆t)e−i(Eq+ω)∆t cosh2(θ) + θ(−∆t)ei(Eq−ω)∆t sinh2(θ)
]=
4S
| sin(q)|
[1− | sin(q)|ω − Eq + iε
+1 + | sin(q)|ω + Eq − iε
](21)
When one is odd and one is even, the calculation is similar,
D+−(jt, j′t′) = −i〈GS|T S+(j, t)S−(j′, t′)|GS〉
= −4Si∑q
e−iEq(t−t′)θ(t− t′)〈GS| cosh θ sinh θc†(q)c(q) + cosh θ sinh θθd(q)d†(q)|GS〉
− 4Si∑q
eiEq(t−t′)θ(t′ − t)〈GS| cosh θ sinh θθc†(q)c(q) + cosh θ sinh θθd(q)d†(q)|GS〉
(22)
The propagator in the momentum space is
D+−(q) =4S cos(q)
| sin(q)|
[1
ω − Eq − iε+
1
ω + Eq + iε
](23)
5
For D33,
D33(jt, j′t′) = −i〈GS|T (S − n(j, t))(S − n(j′, t′))|GS〉 (24)
It includes term 〈GS|a†(j)a(j)|GS〉 and term 〈GS|a†(j)a(j)a†(j′)a(j′)|GS〉.The propagator in the momentum space is
D33 = NS2δq,πδq′,π
[− 1
ω − iδ+
1
ω + iδ
]+δq+q′,0N
∑k
=(cosh θk−q/2 sinh θk+q/2 − cosh θk+q/2 sinh θk−q/2
)×(
1
ω − Ek−q/2 − Ek+q/2 + iε− 1
ω − Ek−q/2 − Ek+q/2 − iε
)(25)
1.10
The propogator is already calculated in the above problem.
1.11
From the result on D+−(p, ω), there is a pole when cos2(q/2) → 0 . Thisrequires that q = π.
2 The electron gas
2.1
The Feynman propagator for the non-interacting system
Gσ,σ′
0 = −i0〈G|Tψσ(x)ψ†σ′(x′)|G〉0
= −iσσ,σ′
∑α
ϕ∗α(r)ϕα(r′)×[θ(α−G)ei(Eα−EG)(t−t′))θ(t− t′)− θ(G− α)ei(Eα−EG)(t−t′))θ(t′ − t)
]= sigmaσ,σ′
∑α
ϕ∗α(r)ϕα(r′)
[θ(α−G)
ω − (Eα − EG) + iδ+
θ(G− α)
ω − (Eα − EG − iδ)
](26)
6
For free fermion, we have
Gσ,σ′
0 = δσ,σ′
∫d3peip(r−r
′)
[θ(|p| − pF )
ω − p2
2m+ iδ
+θ(pF − |p|)ω − p2
2m− iδ
](27)
Hence after Fourier transformation, we have
GF (p, ω) =θ(|p| − pF )
ω − p2
2m+ iδ
+θ(pF − |p|)ω − p2
2m− iδ
=1
ω − E(p) + iε(|p| − pF )=
1
ω − E(p) + iεsign ω(28)
2.2
(a) The density operator is
〈ρ(x, y)〉 = −i limt′→t
GF (x, t, σ, y, t′, σ′) (29)
(b) Using the result in Eq.(28), we have
ρ(x, y) ∼∫ π
0
dθ sin θ
∫dp p2
(2π)3ei cos θp|x−y|θ(pF − |p|)
∼ 1
(2π)3
∫ pF
0
dp psin(p|x− y|)|x− y|
∼ 1
r2(−pF cos(pF r) +
1
rsin(pF r)) (30)
where r = |x− y|.In the short distance limit when r << 1/pF , we have
ρ(r) ≈ p3F
3π2(31)
In the long distance limit when r >> 1/pF , the second term is negligible,we have
ρ(r) ≈ −pF cos(rpF )
π2r2(32)
It decays as 1/r2 and is also oscillatory.
7
3 (a.).
f~r)t or-cter ~
t~ k-k_ (
~ ~ --7 ) R k) P..
-t\ -r -t \
@ 1_8 lb . If
CoY +he I
Gr, ~ C:-2)
-l
~0~
~
f!rft or-oter- .
l. s b(C j!._j Grocfz1 ) qock) ~r l C(%)) ~ D ~
j~Cr/-k- J q,cJ, C:t;, lj,) l 'L)
-1 j2J~'-k Gt k > q ~~-v . t(J ~'l
( C:r,C~J 2 G-o~~ to) ([9 CF-, J kr
~ (" +k } e<o~ pvc)er:
0 Cf~ ~ <:(~ '-R) tr{)Ck &9 1R) J Z [[L&_ G{((J o} (o CZth 0
f)
(Y cc----- -~ c-r i? 'k-J er. c ~)r ~ 0 .l 't.J &- uL-'ld cy,) l'l, J ~~12-
Q) Ci ~ - ~jz (i.ckJ &.~ C:[otk:-tl izo<f -t~ G. c'(, ~~l
@ G. r-V- cr \ f CzM &.<-VC:z.C:t &.C-1J l''; l oJ '- J 1_
CD G "-" - ~ ~ ~ (r .CkJ Er ol~J q-. L~ t) l 't C:r~~.) (:{_~ I - r.; vet, tk,~
(iJ 0 ~ - ~ ) L_ G,.().cJ q-,cf,J Crol ~J vto &oLkJ vctJ f:r•Ck,-Y- J
k,,t
\!! 0 "'-" ~ j L c,.u .. ; Vi5t &.c ~-t J ((.t~J v i!{J er. L~-'tJ &.c;. J C[,, 'tz.
@) 6r ~ -l ) L G-·<1! VL t, J 6-.Ck-'LJ ~- CkJ Vl0 l (r.l( Jtr.U.)
~~~ 'JJ G( ~ -~ _f --z: Q.Cki VloJ G1,l"' ~ci'J V('t,J (r.cHu Ci.Lk)
C(,l,'t
(J_j 6: ~ ~ s L Q. Cb1 W J ~tlj C:t. t.f>-,; VlV ~·lk t't
0~ - G: ~ { f L ({" l~l vl• J ~. lFJ C::c ~.l &.U.,l Vl· l E:z.L~, J t., ,~'1-
@ & ~ ~ s 2 ((,GkJ VCtJ ((. L~-~) C:(.c/2- ~- ~ ,) VL9.,J (z.C/L-'&-J (roC/> J
~,C(l. I
{j0 q ""~ f '2: Go(}J &.cr,) VCoJ&:.c~,) (:z,(f>.,J l o) {i,!,k,j ~,b-
(Tp-G- "-" d Z G: lll Crol~J (x.c V?,; V( 'U ltoc..~ ._) ({.Ch -(,J ll(ZJ ~~~JL~l.
® rq "--" cl r tz.(}.) q,<J,J vC<c,;f(.ck(4J vc'ii) G-r,c~(L,Jbz.tkJ ~ t\
@ (( '"'-.-- -.!-.I L q' (.~ J q, l ~) q;, C.k,-'t.J (] 0 c />, - 'l.-'&J 6z .c ~- 'i,J v ( <t, ) 'Ul._) 2. }L( .tt
Q ~ &_ ~ ~ j y Ez• <.k} \1 ct.) G(,.(k- 't1) (z,(k bivek•) 1/( Oj (J.tfoJ ~(\C(,
(f__'lj G- ~;) L (r.(~J (:(.(j.l (,; ({. CkJ (;z.ck; VLt,J G-.{h-4J ~ ~~~.~
~ ~ ~ ~ S 2. C:t ,(]..; q 0 c~~ vc· l tz. c.k.J ftq ttz) vc 'i l fr, Lh -v
k,,nul
ll)
l~) t
(p V\A~((Qcl ol\ ~ f'~J .
'!_ [ H E)-t 0~-t co~ 0 ~--J t
V <AC CA.UW\ cA 1\ a_J v- etrYV) _
Act +h.Q v\{ot. )r~ ~~-====:~ -
V occ(.{M,~ cA 1 ""-1 r~ -
q:::--~-~ lv-~) - 'Z_Ck)
YT ~+ -t ~ + c::>
~
fi
2.3
(a) For any operator O, the expectation value is
〈O(t)〉 = 〈Ψ(t)|O|Ψ(t)〉 (33)
Applying some perturbation term to the Hamiltonian, we have
δO(t) = 〈G|OH′ |G〉 − 〈G|OH |G〉
= i
∫dt′〈G
[Hext(t′), O(t)
]||G〉 (34)
For an electron system interacts with an external potential, the changeof the local density δρ(x) caused by the external potential is
δρ(p, ω) = Π(p, ω)V (p, ω) = Π0(p, ω)Veff (p, ω) (35)
δρ(x) can be obtained by performing Fourier transformation on δρ(p, ω).(b) δρ(x) is
δρ(x) =
∫d3pΠ(p, ω = 0)V (p)e−i~p·~x (36)
In our model, V (x) is a point charge of strength Q at the origin, hence
V (p) =4πQ
p2(37)
Inserting the potential in δρ(x), we have
δρ(x) =
∫d3pΠ(p, ω = 0)V (p)e−i~p·~x
=
∫d3pΠ0(p, ω = 0)Veff (p, ω = 0)e−i~p·~x
=
∫d3p
V (p, ω = 0)Π0(p, ω = 0)
1− V (p, ω = 0)Π0(p, ω = 0)e−i~p·~x
(38)
where the density propagator Π0 equals to
Π0(p, ω) = 2
∫d3k
(2π)3θ(|k + q| − pF )θ(pF − |k|)×[
1
ω + (E(k)− E(k + q)) + iε− 1
ω − (E(k)− E(k + q)− iδ)
](39)
8
Veff equals to
Veff (p, ω) =V (p)
1− V (p)Π0(p, ω)=
V (p)
ε(p, ω)(40)
In the static limit,
Π0(q, ω = 0) = −8
∫d3k
(2π)3
θ(|k + q| − pF )θ(pF − |k|)q2 + 2k · q
(41)
According to Eq.(4.88) in the lecture notes, the static dielectric functionε(q, ω = 0) is
ε(q, 0) = 1 +
(4
9π
)1/3
rsu(x)
x2(42)
where x = |q|2pF
and rs satisfies
pFa0rs =
(9π
4
)1/3
(43)
The dimensionless function u(x) is
u(x) =1
2
(1 +
1
2x(1− x2) log
∣∣∣∣1 + x
1− x
∣∣∣∣) (44)
when x→ 0,
u(x) =1
2+
1
4x(1− x2) log
∣∣∣∣1 + x
1− x
∣∣∣∣ =1
2+
1
2= 1 (45)
Therefore we have(4
9π
)1/3
rsu(x)
x2≈(
4
9π
)1/3
rs1
x2=λ2
p2(46)
where λ is proportional to the Thomas-Fermi screening length ξTF definedin the lecture notes.
Combing Eq.(39), Eq.(40) and Eq.(46) together, we have
δρ(x) = −∫
d3p
(2π)3
λ2
p2 + λ2ei~p·~x = −λ
2
4π
1
|x|e−|x|/εTF (47)
9
where we used Eq.(4.95) in the lecture notes. Actually there is some issuewith the above calculation. There is a weak singularity as x → 1. If theFermi surface is sharp, there will be some extra contribution to the dielectricfunction in the denominator of Veff .
Below we do the calculation more carefully,
δρ(x) =
∫d3p
(2π)3δρ(p)e−i~p·~x =
∫ ∞0
dp
(2π)2p2
∫ 1
−1
d cos(θ)δρ(p)e−ip|x| cos θ
=
∫ ∞0
dp
2π2|x|1− ε(p)ε(p)
sin(p|x|) (48)
where ε(p) = ε(p, 0).Define
g(p) =1
2π2p
1− ε(p)ε(p)
(49)
We have
δρ(x) =1
|x|
∫ ∞0
dpg(p) sin(p|x|) = − 1
|x|3
∫ ∞0
dpg′′(p) sin(p|x|) (50)
where the second term is obtained by performing integration by parts twice.Since there is a singularity in ε(p) when x→ 1, when we expand around
x = 1, the most singular part in g′′ is
g′′(p) ∼ A
p− 2pF(51)
By using sin(px) = sin[(p− 2pF )x] cos(2pFx) + cos[(p− 2pF )x] sin(2pFx),we can write Eq.(50) as
δρ(x) =A
|x|3
∫ 2p+Λ
2pF−Λ
sin[(p− 2pF )|x|] cos(2pF |x|) + cos[(p− 2pF )|x|] sin(2pF |x|)p− 2pF
dp
(52)
When pF |x| >> 1, we have
δρ(x) ∼ A cos(2pF |x|)|x|3
(53)
It decays as 1/|x|3. The oscillation behavior of the charge density is due thesharp Fermi surface and this behavior is called Friedel oscillation.
10