solution spoo tlight - · pdf filesolution spoo tlight ... technology is the key to being...
TRANSCRIPT
Solution Sp tlightoSolution Sp tlightoHYBRID SOFTWARE-HARDWARE APPLIANCETRANSCODING FOR LINEAR VIDEO DELIVERY
Copyright 2017, ARRIS Enterprises, LLC., All rights reservedWEB BLOGwww.arris.com www.arriseverywhere.com
Solution Spotlight
Hardware-based Transcoding for Optimal Linear Video Delivery
Today’s subscribers expect a wide array of premium channels
for their entertainment and information, whether they're
watching on the living room TV or using one of the many
devices at their ngertips. However, the dynamics of linear
bbroadcast video are much different from those of stored
content, especially when it comes to transcoding. Unlike
VoD and DVR applications, linear broadcasting places a
steady, heavy workload on the transcoder–24 hours a day,
7 days a week, 365 days a year. With the evolution from
standard denition (SD) to high denition (HD) to 4K and
Ultra HD (UHD), subscribers continue to demand the highest
qualiquality linear video experience and service providers must
continue to deliver it.
The Challenge: Efficiently Delivering the Optimal Linear Video Experience
Service providers are tasked with delivering a premier quality of experience (QoE) in a cost-effective
way while not exceeding the available capacity within their networks. This strategy is critical to
attracting and retaining subscribers and supporting the overall business model. The right transcoding
technology is the key to being able to run channels at lower bit rates, especially with HEVC. For a given
bit bit rate, service providers have to deliver a better, crisper picture with no artifacts to meet today’s
subscriber expectations. They can also decide to use the added capacity that results from lower bit
rates to free up bandwidth for other high-demand services. Most likely, service providers will end up
using both approaches to varying degrees, depending on their needs at that time.
ARRIS Solution: The Best of Both Hardware and Software
As service providers evaluate the solutions that best address this challenge, there is an industry trend toward a virtualized transcoding architecture. This approach leverages pools of general-purpose servers
ththat run video compression software. However, when it comes to the steady-state demands of live linear
1
• Less power and space required
• Improved video compression efficiency
• Increased reliability
• Higher quality of experience
• Lower TCO
BENEFITS FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS
Copyright 2017, ARRIS Enterprises, LLC., All rights reservedWEB BLOGwww.arris.com www.arriseverywhere.com2
broadcasting, hardware-based systems work
best. Their specialized processors are nely
tuned for the computations involved in video
processing, providing the consistently high
performance it takes to transcode high
quality video in real time. The ME-7000 takes
adadvantage of hardware-based compression
but capitalizes on software systems to provide
exibility and rapid time to market, combining
the best of both worlds.
ARRIS uses a dedicated encoding chip
designed for video compression with special
rmware for high quality broadcast video. The
ME-7000 also distME-7000 also distributes software processes
across multiple CPUs so there are no bottle-
neck issues, even with hundreds of channels.
This approach enables service providers to
efficiently scale up or down as needed.
In addition to its performance capabilities,
the ME-7000 consumes less power and space, resulting in a reduction in operational expenses. Due
tto the low space consumption, the service provider isn’t forced to put the equipment in a data center.
It can reside in a head-end facility which gives the service provider more control and therefore, better
performance reliability. Service outages or impairments are more easily and more quickly managed
with an integrated, hybrid hardware/software system than having to coordinate across different
hardware and software application supplier and across the video and IT groups within the service
provider’s organization.
The Opportunity: Delivering High Quality Linear Video at a Lower Cost
BBecause the ME-7000 uses an integrated hardware/software approach that best supports the steady, heavy workload of linear broadcasting, it has a long lifecycle of more than ve years.
ME-7000Pure software alternative
Power Costs
$47,304
$157,680
A Savings of
70% 12
364
5123
50%improvement
Modules/Bladesper Chassis
56% less
$1,575,000
$3,585,000
Software Costs
THE RIGHT SOLUTIONFOR IMPROVED ROI
AVC Costs over a Five-year Period (300 Channels)
Power Costs
$69,379
$441,504
A Savings of
84% 12
364
512
67%improvement
Source: ARRIS TCO Model
Modules/Bladesper Chassis
77% less
$2,310,000
$10,038,000
Software Costs
HEVC Costs over a Five-year Period (300 Channels)
Copyright 2017, ARRIS Enterprises, LLC., All rights reserved |17Apr17WEB BLOGwww.arris.com www.arriseverywhere.com3
Software-based systems that use COTS (common off the shelf) server hardware have to be routinely replaced about every two years due to early failure of components, such as the CPU, for the live linear broadcast use case. This has a signicant impact on replacement costs and total cost of ownership (TCO). Contributing to the lower TCO of the ME-7000, service providers can reduce power expenditures and real estate space which yield additional cost savings.
The low TCO combined with the ability to deliver higher quality video at lower bit rates and the exibility to free up network capacity, puts service providers in a strong position to keep pace with linear video's ever-evolving needs and efficiently respond to subscriber demand.
For more information on the ME-7000,please visit http://www.arris.com/products/me-7000