somatic embryogenesis induction in bolus ex. hook f.studentsrepo.um.edu.my/2125/5/ch_4.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
107
CHAPTER 4
SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS INDUCTION IN Gerbera jamesonii
Bolus ex. Hook f.
4.1 EXPERIMENTAL AIMS
Somatic embryos are formed from somatic or vegetative cells that are not
normally involved in reproduction or the development of embryos. No endosperm or seed
coat is formed around a somatic embryo. There are many applications of somatic
embryogenesis such as clonal propagation of genetically uniform plant materials,
elimination of viruses from plants, generation of plants from single cells through
protoplasts and also development of synthetic seeds technology. Somatic embryogenesis
was first observed by Reinert (1958) and Steward et al. (1958) in Daucus carota cell
suspension cultures. Somatic embryogenesis has proven to be useful for
micropropagation. Sharp et al. (1980) reported that there are two types of somatic
embryogenesis, direct embryogenesis and indirect somatic embryogenesis. Direct somatic
embryogenesis occurs when an embryo is formed directly from a cell or tissue without
callus formation. Meanwhile, indirect somatic embryogenesis form when embryos are
derived from cells of callus phase.
There are several factors that influence the induction of somatic embryogenesis
such as the addition of plant growth regulators in the culture medium, type of explants
used, type of medium, physical and environmental factors and many others. Depending
on the plant species, hormones in the culture medium play very important role in the
108
induction of somatic embryogenesis. In some plant species, the addition of auxin with or
without the combination of cytokinin induces the somatic embryogenesis. Nevertheless,
in some cases, the development of an embryo from the embryogenic cells is usually
accomplished by the absence of auxin in the culture medium.
The objectives of the study in this chapter were to achieve direct and indirect
somatic embryogenesis from leaves and petiole explants of aseptic seedlings of Gerbera
jamesonii Bolus ex. Hook f. The most suitable and responsive explant in the induction of
somatic embryogenesis was first identified. Various plant hormones were added in the
culture medium to identify the suitable hormones that could induce whether direct or
indirect somatic embryogenesis. Embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus would be
identified through double staining technique (Gupta et al., 1987). Different phases of
somatic embryos, i.e. globular, heart, torpedo and cotyledonary were identified in this
chapter. Somatic embryo obtained from this experiment would further be used in the
production of synthetic seeds and also for regeneration and acclimatization of plantlets in
the green house.
109
4.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
4.2.1 Preparation of Explants
Leaf explants obtained from 8-week-old aseptic seedlings were used in this
experiment. Secondary leaf explants were cut into 10mm x 10 mm size with midrib
discarded were utilized to initiate cultures. In order to obtain aseptic seedlings, Gerbera
seeds were soaked in distilled water for 30 minutes with addition of 1-2 drops of Tween-
20 followed by 40% (v/v) sodium chloride solution and gently agitated for 10 minutes.
The seeds were then rinsed 3 times in distilled water and then soaked in 70% (v/v)
alcohol for 1 minute. Finally, the seeds were rinsed 3 times in sterile distilled water.
Sterilized seeds were cultured on MS (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) basal medium. pH of
the medium was adjusted to 5.8 prior to autoclaving at 121 oC for 21 minutes.
4.2.2 Preparation of Culture Medium and Callus Induction
MS medium (1962) containing 30 g/l sucrose and 8 g/l technical agar was used in
this experiment. pH of the medium was set to 5.8 prior to autoclaving. In this experiment,
various types of plant hormones such as 2,4-D, BAP, and TDZ were used to study
induction of embryogenic callus. Based on previous research, Bespalhok and Hattori
(1998) used MD medium supplemented with the combination of 2, 4-D and Kinetin to
induce somatic embyogenesis in Tagetes erecta L. (African marigold). Gupta and Conger
(1999) reported that somatic embryogenesis of Panicum virgatum L. was established in
MS medium fortified with 2, 4-D and BAP. Somatic embryogenesis was also observed
110
when floret explants of Dendrathema grandiflorum were cultured on MS medium
containing high concentrations of IAA and Kinetin (Tanaka et al., 2000). However, in
this experiment, 2, 4-D, BAP and TDZ were used for the aim of induction of
embryogenic callus.
4.2.3 Identification of Embryogenic Callus
For identification of embryogenic callus, a small piece of callus was placed on a
glass slide and 2-3 drops of 2% acetocarmine solution was dropped onto the callus. The
callus were divided into small pieces and heated over a low flame for a few seconds. The
slide was rinsed with distilled water to remove all liquid. Two to three drops of 0.5% of
Evan’s blue solution was dropped to acetocarmine stained cells. After 30 seconds, the
slide was rinsed again with distilled water and all excessive water was removed. 1-2
drops of glycerol was added to the stained cells, in order to prevent the cells from drying.
4.2.4 Embryogenic Callus Initiation and Establishment of Cell Suspension Culture
The secondary leaves of aseptic seedlings were cultured on MS medium
supplemented with 0.1- 2.0 mg/l 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2, 4-D), 3.0% sucrose
and 0.8% agar and incubated in the dark at 25 ± 1oC for 2 months. After 2 months, white
friable callus was formed and these callus were transferred into somatic embryo induction
suspension culture medium consisting of 0.1-2.0 mg/l 2, 4-D and 0.1 or 1.0 mg/l α-
Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) with 3.0% sucrose. Ten 125 ml flasks containing 30 ml
of the medium and 2.0 g of callus tissue were used in two replicates. All cultures were
111
incubated on a rotary shaker at 110 rpm and maintained in the dark at 25 ± 1oC. The
cultures were subcultured at 10 days interval for 4 to 6 weeks.
4.2.5 Induction of Somatic Embryos
The cells of suspension cultures were then filtered through 425 µm pore size
woven wire test sieve to separate the cell clumps. The filtrate was rinsed with basal liquid
MS medium. The cell clumps were then transferred into 25 petri dishes containing MS
medium supplemented with 0.1-1.0 mg/l BAP and 0.1-1.0 mg/l NAA with the addition of
0-50 mM Proline in each treatment. All cultures were incubated under 16 hours light and
8 hours dark at 25 ± 1oC. Cultures were observed for 4-6 weeks.
4.2.6 Development of Plantlets from Somatic Embryos
Shoots developed from somatic embryos were transferred to MS basal medium
for further development of plantlet and root growth. All cultures were incubated in the
culture room under 16 hours light and 8 hours dark with 1000 lux light intensity.
4.2.7 Microscopic Studies
Microscopy studies on somatic embryogenesis were done using
Microphotography Microscope and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Somatic
embryogenesis stages like globular, heart shape, torpedo and cotyledonary phases were
further identified in this study.
112
4.2.8 Data Analysis
Data obtained were analyzed using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT). Mean with
different letters in the same column differ significantly at p=0.05.
113
4.3 RESULTS
4.3.1 Induction and Identification of Embryogenic Callus
White-cream friable callus was formed after 6 weeks when leaf explants were
cultured on MS medium supplemented with 0.01-2.0 mg/l 2, 4-D (Table 4.1). Green
compact callus was formed when the same explants were cultured on 0.01-2.0 mg/l TDZ
(Table 4.2). Green and yellowish callus were also observed when leaf explants were
cultured on MS medium supplemented with the combination of 0.1 BAP and 0.01-2.0
mg/l 2,4-D (Table 4.3). Young secondary leaves from aseptic seedling were identified
as the best explant for the induction of embryogenic callus and somatic embryos. These
callus were tested using double staining method to determine the embryogenic and non-
embryogenic features.
Observations made under microscope of the white-cream friable callus (Table
4.1) showed early stage embryos after double staining was done, the embryonal heads
stained red (Figure 4.1 a) and suspensors stained blue. Meanwhile, when the green
callus was double stained, the cells remained blue and did not show any organization of
head and suspensor (Figure 4.1 b). Cross section of embryogenic (Figure 4.2 a) and non-
embryogenic callus (Figure 4.2 b) were made and examined under scanning electron
microscope. The embryogenic callus have thicker cell walls compared to cell walls of
non-embryogenic callus.
114
The addition of 2, 4-D at concentration of 0.01-2.0 mg/l in the MS medium has
initiated the growth of embryogenic callus. All callus formed was friable and white-
cream coloured. No callus was formed when explants were cultured on MS basal
medium. Embryogenic callus was obtained (100%) when explants were cultured on MS
medium supplemented with 1.8mg/l and 2.0 mg/l 2, 4-D with the addition of 30% sucrose
and 0.8% technical agar (Table 4.1). However, production of embryogenic callus
decreased as 2, 4-D concentration in medium increased over 2.0 mg/l.
115
Table 4.1: Induction of callus from leaf explants cultured on MS medium supplemented with 2, 4-D after 8 weeks.
Hormone (mg/l) (2,4-D)
Callus formation (%) after 8 weeks
Observations
0.0 0.0 No formation of callus
0.01 49.7 ± 1.1 White friable callus Embryogenic callus
0.1 65.7 ± 3.0 White friable callus Embryogenic callus
0.5 69.3 ± 1.7 White friable callus Embryogenic callus
1.0 73.1 ± 0.9 White friable callus Embryogenic callus
1.1 73.5 ± 0.3 White friable callus Embryogenic callus
1.2 73.9 ± 0.5 White friable callus Embryogenic callus
1.3 75.2 ± 0.7 White friable callus Embryogenic callus
1.4 77.8 ± 1.3 White friable callus Embryogenic callus
1.5 85.0 ± 0.6 White friable callus Embryogenic callus
1.6 87.9 ± 1.0 White friable callus Embryogenic callus
1.7 88.0 ± 0.8 White friable callus Embryogenic callus
1.8 100 ± 0.0 White friable callus Embryogenic callus
1.9 100 ± 0.0 White friable callus Embryogenic callus
2.0 100 ± 0.0 White friable callus Embryogenic callus
116
Table 4.2: Induction of callus from leaf explants cultured on MS medium supplemented with TDZ after 8 weeks. Hormone (mg/l) (TDZ)
Callus formation (%) after 8 weeks
Observations
0.0 0.0 No formation of callus
0.01 13.2 ± 1.0 Green compact callus Non-embryogenic callus
0.1 25.4 ± 1.2 Green compact callus Non-embryogenic callus
0.5 26.8 ± 1.2 Green compact callus Non-embryogenic callus
1.0 35.0 ± 0.6 Green compact callus Non-embryogenic callus
1.1 33.6 ± 0.5 Green compact callus Non-embryogenic callus
1.2 40.9 ± 0.2 Green compact callus Non-embryogenic callus
1.3 52.0 ± 1.1 Green compact callus Non-embryogenic callus
1.4 54.7 ± 0.4 Green compact callus Non-embryogenic callus
1.5 54.7 ± 0.5 Green compact callus Non-embryogenic callus
1.6 57.9 ± 1.0 Green compact callus Non-embryogenic callus
1.7 53.8 ± 0.7 Green compact callus Non-embryogenic callus
1.8 58.1± 1.5 Green compact callus Non-embryogenic callus
1.9 66.7 ± 1.8 Green compact callus Non-embryogenic callus
2.0 70.6 ± 0.8 Green compact callus Non-embryogenic callus
117
Table 4.3: Induction of callus from leaves explants cultured on MS medium supplemented with BAP and 2,4-D after 8 weeks.
Hormone (mg/l)
BAP 2,4-D
Callus formation (%) after 8 weeks
Observation
0.0
0.0 0.0 No formation of callus
0.1 0.0 0.0 Green compact callus Non-embrogenic callus
0.1 0.01 4.5 ± 0.9 Green compact callus Non-embrogenic callus
0.1 0.1 10.3 ± 0.5 Green compactcallus Non-embrogenic callus
0.1 0.5 11.0 ± 1.2 Light green friable callus Non-embrogenic callus
0.1 1.0 16.0 ± 1.1 Light green friable callus Non-embrogenic callus
0.1 1.1 24.4 ± 0.6 Light green friable callus Non-embrogenic callus
0.1 1.2 25.1 ± 0.8 Light green friable callus Non-embrogenic callus
0.1 1.3 24.8 ± 1.2 Light green friable callus Non-embrogenic callus
0.1 1.4 33.2 ± 1.2 Light green friable callus Non-embrogenic callus
0.1 1.5 33.5 ± 0.9 Yellowish green friable callus Non-embrogenic callus
0.1 1.6 35.1 ± 1.1 Yellowish green friable callus Non-embrogenic callus
0.1 1.7 34.3 ± 1.5 Yellowish green friable callus Non-embrogenic callus
0.1 1.8 38.0 ± 0.4 Yellowish green friable callus Non-embrogenic callus
0.1 1.9 40.2 ± 1.3 Yellowish green friable callus Non-embrogenic callus
0.1 2.0 41.5 ± 0.7 Yellowish green friable callus Non-embrogenic callus
118
Figure 4.1 (a): Embryogenic callus cells stained red with acetocarmine. Figure 4.1 (b): Non-embryogenic callus cells stained blue with Evan’s blue stain.
X 100
X 100
119
Figure 4.2 (a): Cross section of embryogenic callus observed under Scanning Electron Microscope. Embryogenic callus shows ticker cell wall and friable structure.
Figure 4.2 (b): Cross section of non-embryogenic callus observed under Scanning
Electron Microscope. Non-embryogenic cell wall shows compact and thin cell wall.
120
4.3.2 Induction and Development of Somatic Embryos
Embryogenic callus formed were then transferred into MS cell suspension
medium containing 0.1-2.0 mg/l 2, 4-D and 0.1 or 1.0 mg/l NAA for 1 month. All
cultured callus began to dissociate into single cells and small cell clumps within the
period. Embryogenesis was observed after 1 week in cell suspension culture. Cell clusters
and aggregates from cell suspension culture were observed (Figure 4.3). Cells were
sieved and transferred into embryo induction medium containing 0.1-2.0 mg/l BAP and
0.1 or 1.0 mg/l NAA with the addition of 0 or 50 mM L-Proline.
During this phase, stages of somatic embryos were developed (Figure 4.4).
Embryogenic callus which has recovered from suspension medium started to develop on
agar solidified medium. Three weeks after the transfer of embryogenic callus to the
embryo induction medium, 15.7 ± 1.4 embryos were developed in culture medium
supplemented with 1.0 mg/l BAP and 0.1 mg/l NAA without the addition of L-proline
(Table 4.4). Meanwhile, medium supplemented with the same concentration of growth
regulators, with the addition of 50 mM L-proline produced higher embryo at 29.8 ± 1.2
embryos. Morphological observation of the embryo stages was done and stages from
globular (Figure 4.5 a, 4.6 a), heart (Figure 4.5 b, 4.6 a), torpedo (Figure 4.5 c, 4.6 c) and
cotyledonary (Figure 4.5 d, 4.6 d) were successfully identified through microphotography
microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Addition of L-proline in the
induction medium (Table 4.4) promoted the development of somatic embryos to form
shoots and plantlets.
121
All embryos were then transferred to MS basal medium for further development
of shoots (Figure 4.7) and root growth (Table 4.5). Plantlets formed were then transferred
to soil and grown in the green house for further growth and development.
122
Table 4.4: Effects of BAP , NAA and L-Proline on formation of somatic embryos of Gerbera jamesonii Bolus ex. Hook f.
Number of Somatic Embryos per Explant
NAA (mg/l) NAA (mg/l) + 50 mM L-Proline
BAP
(mg/l)
0.1 1.0 0.1 1.0
0.0 0.0 ± 0.0a 0.0 ± 0.0a 0.0 ± 0.0 a 0.0 ± 0.0a 0.01 0.0 ± 0.0a 0.0 ± 0.0a 3.4 ± 1.0b 0.0 ± 0.0a 0.1 5.2 ± 0.3b 0.0 ± 0.0a 9.7± 1.5b 0.0 ± 0.0a 0.2 5.4 ± 0.2b 0.0 ± 0.0a 8.2 ± 1.3b 0.0 ± 0.0a 0.3 5.8 ± 1.1b 0.0 ± 0.0a 11.6 ± 1.2bc 0.0 ± 0.0a 0.4 7.3 ± 0.5b 0.0 ± 0.0a 14.3 ± 0.4bc 0.0 ± 0.0a 0.5 8.0 ± 1.0b 0.0 ± 0.0a 21.3 ± 0.8cd 0.0 ± 0.0a 0.6 7.7 ± 0.6b 0.0 ± 0.0a 23.2 ± 1.1cd 2.2 ± 0.7b 0.7 10.3 ± 1.3bc 2.1 ± 1.5b 24.6 ± 0.6cd 5.4 ± 1.3b 0.8 10.7 ± 0.8bc 1.8 ± 0.7b 25.1 ± 1.7cd 7.3 ± 1.0b 0.9 12.6 ± 0.5bc 2.9 ± 0.5b 27.3 ± 2.1d 10.2 ± 0.8bc 1.0 15.7 ± 1.4c 3.3 ± 0.1b 29.8 ± 1.2d 11.6 ± 0.9bc 1.1 15.3 ± 1.4c 3.0 ± 0.5b 28.3 ± 0.5d 11.0 ± 1.2bc 1.2 14.9 ± 0.8c 3.8 ± 1.1b 28.0 ± 1.1d 10.8 ± 1.5bc 1.3 15.6 ± 0.5c 4.6 ± 1.0b 26.5 ± 0.8d 11.4 ± 0.5bc 1.4 13.4 ± 1.3bc 4.1 ± 1.6b 26.0 ± 0.3d 10.1 ± 2.3bc 1.5 14.7 ± 2.2c 5.7 ± 0.8b 27.4 ± 1.2d 10.5 ± 1.6bc 1.6 13.0 ± 1.6c 5.0 ± 0.6b 23.7 ± 1.5cd 8.9 ± 1.0b 1.7 12.8 ± 0.5bc 4.8 ± 2.4b 23.1 ± 0.3cd 9.4 ± 0.5b 1.8 11.5 ± 0.7bc 5.5 ± 0.8b 20.6 ± 0.6cd 8.7 ± 0.7b 1.9 10.9 ± 1.7bc 6.0 ± 1.3b 21.9 ± 1.4cd 8.0 ± 0.3b 2.0 10.4 ± 0.5bc 6.2 ± 0.4b 18.5 ± 1.7c 7.2 ± 1.1b
Mean with different letters differ significantly at p= 0.05
123
Table 4.5: Composition of culture medium and growth condition for Gerbera jamesonii somatic embryo induction
Growth Regulators (mg/l) Culture stage Culture medium BAP NAA 2,4-D
L- Proline (mM)
Culture duration (week)
Seedling Callus induction Cell suspension Embryo induction Conditioning phase Root growth
MS MS MS MS MS MS
- - - 0.1-2.0 - -
- - 0.1 0.1-1.0 - -
- 0.1-2.0 1.0 - - -
- - - 0-50 - -
8 6 1 3 3 2
124
Figure 4.3: Somatic embryogenesis of Gerbera jamesonii from suspension culture
Figure 4.4: Globular and heart shaped stages of somatic embryos formed on embryo induction medium.
2.0 cm
1.0 cm
G
H
125
Figure 4.5 (a): Globular- shaped phase somatic embryo observed under
microphotography microscope
Figure 4.5 (b): Heart-shaped phase somatic embryo observed under microphotography microscope
0.05 cm
0.05 cm
126
Figure 4.5 (c): Torpedo-shaped somatic embryo observed under microphotography microscope
Figure 4.5 (d): Cotyledonary phase somatic embryo of Gerbera jamesonii
0.05 cm
0.4 cm
127
Figure 4.6 (a): Globular-shaped phase somatic embryo observed under Scanning Electron Microscope
Figure 4.6 (b): Heart-shaped phase somatic embryo observed under Scanning Electron Microscope
H
G
G
128
Figure 4.6 (c): Torpedo-shaped phase somatic embryo observed under Scanning Electron Microscope
Figure 4.6 (d): Cotyledonary phase somatic embryo observed under Scanning Electron Microscope
129
Figure 4.7: Micro shoots developed from somatic embryo of Gerbera jamesonii
0.25 cm
130
4.4 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1. Young secondary leaf explants were the most responsive explant to form embryogenic callus with 100 ± 0.0% callus formation when 1.8-2.0 mg/l 2,4-D was supplemented to culture media. Non- embryogenic callus was induced when TDZ and combination of 2,4-D and BAP were supplemented in the culture media.
2. Double staining method was used to distinguish the embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus. White cream friable callus showed early stage embryos after double staining was done. The embryonal heads stained red and suspensors stained blue. Cells of green callus remained blue and did not show any organization of head and suspensor when stained.
3. Cross section of embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus showed that embryogenic callus had thicker cell walls compared to non-embryogenic callus cells.
4. The highest number of somatic embryos (29.8 ± 1.2) was obtained when embryogenic cell clusters were transferred into embryo induction medium containing 1.0 mg/l BAP and 0.1 mg/l NAA with the addition of 50 mM L-Proline. While 15.7 ± 1.4 somatic embryos were induced when the embryogenic clusters were transferred to 1.0 mg/l BAP and 0.1 mg/l NAA without the addition of L-Proline.
5. Different stages of somatic embryos (globular, heart, torpedo and cotyledonary- shaped) were observed during the culture period through microphotography microscope and scanning electron microscope.
6. The addition of L-Proline in the embryo induction medium enhanced the induction of somatic embryos.