some challenges in modelling volcanic occurrence datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · completeness...

20
Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Data Mark Bebbington IIST & Volcanic Risk Solutions, Massey University

Upload: others

Post on 23-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Data

Mark BebbingtonIIST & Volcanic Risk Solutions, Massey University

Page 2: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

What is an Eruption?• Arrival of solid volcanic products at surface• Events ranging from an individual explosion to

eruptive periods lasting centuries– Includes quiet periods of up to 3 months– Often `stop’ dates go unrecorded.

• `Historical’ eruptions– Presence of observers, monitoring, weather

• `Pre-historical’ eruptions– Dated, radio-carbon (to 50ka, with error ~ 25 to 1000

yr), K-Ar dating (from 50ka, with error ~ 10 to 100 ka).• VEI (Volcanic Explosivity Index)

– a logarithmic `size’ assigned to historical eruptions on the basis of: explosion size; volume; column height; classification; duration; …

Page 3: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

CompletenessGlobally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed).

BUT

– some volcanoes are much better observed

- Big eruptions are much better observed

- what is an eruption?

Page 4: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Data: The good,

Page 5: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Etna flank eruptions: 1970 –Stationary behaviour?

Are time and size of next eruption `predictable’?

Page 6: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Etna: Flank eruptions 1600-Non-stationary?

60 flank eruptions- “known” onset

dates, duration, and volume

- Complete since ~1600 AD

Page 7: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Etna: Summit + Flank 1970-Independence?

12 summit eruptions, onset dates, durations and volumes, complete since 1970?

Any relation to the flank eruptions?

Page 8: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Data: The Bad,

Page 9: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

A prediction?- The past behaviour of a volcano is the best predictor of its future activity.

“The repetitive nature of the eruptive activity at Mt St Helens during the last 4000 years, with dormant intervals typically of a few centuries or less, suggests that the current quiet period will not last a 1000 years. Instead, an eruption is likely within the next hundred years, possibly before the end of this century”

- Crandell et al., “Mt St Helens volcano: Recent and future behavior”. Science 187:438-441, 1975

- Mt St Helens erupted in 1980, having been quiescent since 1857

Page 10: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Data: The Ugly

VEI > 3

Page 11: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Vesuvius

Cycles initiated by (sub-) plinian event and terminated by repose of several centuries?

Page 12: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Periodicities

Page 13: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

20151050

50

40

30

20

10

0

i

tau

_i

S 14.0130R-Sq 22.0%R-Sq(adj) 11.6%

Fitted Line Plottau_i = 30.32 - 5.096 i + 0.2796 i**2

Page 14: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Radiocarbon Dating• Volcanic products cannot be directly

carbon dated – they were never alive.• Date organic material in (or more often just

under) an eruptive layer. • Dates are given as

N(mu,sigma)• Conversion to

calendar years • Stratigraphic

ordering

Page 15: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Taveuni, Fiji

101 eruptive episodes, individually datedBUT - considerable “rounding”, large error bars

rift volcano – only one spatial dimension

120001000080006000400020000

100

80

60

40

20

0

Years BP

Co

un

t

meanup_bndlow_bnd

Variable

Eruption dates

Page 16: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Taranaki 103 tephras in single core –depths on all, 10 dated individually

Stars = core dates, lines 95% confidence limits

`DODGY’DATE

Page 17: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Taranaki II – 2 cores plus near source

Umutekai104 tephras, c. 1550BP –10100BP

Rotokare45 tephras, c.500BP – 6200BP

Near-source23 tephras, c.90BP – 2200BP

Page 18: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Related cycles of magma-feeding pulses, large eruptions and

eruption frequencyTaranaki

Page 19: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Yucca Mountain40 eruptions in last 10.5Ma. Last 80ka ago.Large error bars, and multiple eruptions with the same estimated age.Widely varying sizes- Probability of disruption of repository in 10ka?

Page 20: Some Challenges in Modelling Volcanic Occurrence Datambebbing/talks/volcanoes.pdf · Completeness Globally, the observance probability rises from 10% in 1500 to 100% in 1980 (assumed)

Auckland

49 cones in last 250ka, last two much bigger, especially last (Rangitoto) – 59% of total volume.

Is there any pattern?